http://jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/evolution_the_big_hoax.htm
http://www.chick.com/reading/books/123/123_02.asp
http://www.carm.org/evolution.htm
Friday, September 29, 2006
Inspiration & Dedication
Urban areas and new information arising is apart of my life. I no longer have a consending attitude about people (whether in America or across the world). I realize that more folks are waking up about the new world order, 911, torture, etc. That's why I will work harder to make as accurate facts as possible to get the truth to as many people as possible. I'm still here. Deception is still rampant from Clinton (who passed NAFTA and sold China high technology) and Richard Armitage (Patriots have exposed his dirt for years). China has oppression like America does. China arrests non-offical, torture, and documentated proof of organ harvesting. China isn't the only location expressing degenerate mayhem. The Korean Bar Association, based in South Korea, found that forced abortions occured in North Korea. The Association interviewed about 100 Korean women who escape into South Korea. 58% of the woman said that they saw forced abortion firsthand. Everything is not gloom and doom. Some good news is that more people support the South Dakota abortion ban (It was from 39% to 44% of people supporting it according to a new Zogby International poll).
As many have written about, many of or rights have been relinquished and more of our rights are threatened continiously. I thought that Senate passing their "detainee" bill was bad enough. I didn't know that the bill was that bad. Jeffrey Smith from the Washington Post on September 29, 2006 wrote that the Bill rejects a speedy trial, immunizes U.S. officials from prosecution for cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment of detainees (captured before the end of last year), and other problems. The bill gives the President the right to detain anyone an emeny conbatment, even jailing them after acquittal. Nothing in the bill protects Americans from this, so this is very bad. According to Daily Kos on September 28, 2006 sodomizing or raping prisoners is OK as long as the President authorizes it for interrogation. Even Hitler didn't write this down (like the Patriot Act, memos supporting torture, and John Yoo wanting to sexually torture children), he just did it. Many Democrats not just Republicans supported this. Laurie Kellman from the Associated Press on September 29, 2006 mentioned that the House passed a bill of warantless wiretaps with some "restrictions." It was passed 232-191. This is against the Fourth Amendment, because the 4th Amendment forbids unwarranted searches and seizures without a warrant and probable cause. This is no difference from the Jesuit-trained Stalin tactics or the freedom suppression by Diem in Vietnam (during the early 1960's. Vietnam and its subesequent slaughter of many innocent Buddhists was loved by Jesuit Dan Lyons [also a 4th Degree Knight of Columbus], CFR member General Westmoreland, and General Creighton W. Abrams. Even Douglas MacArthur told JFK his opposition to the war in SE Asia). Our private property rights are decreasing through eminent domain (supported by most members of our CFR Supreme Court) and other programs. Just look at the Wildlife projects. Of course Bush is a puppet.
I've heard about Oliver Stone being ashamed of America. I'm really ashamed of him not exposing the offical story of 911. With his film JFK (as many know, JFK was about to destroy the CIA, end the Vietnam War possibly by 1965, end oil companies from getting tax breaks, end the intrusive scope of the Fedeal Reserve, opposed Israel getting nuclear weapons, and other policies. He died and many 33rd Degree Freemasons like J. Edgar Hoover, Gerald Ford, and Earl Warren supported the cover up Warren Commission findings. Also, Knights of Malta William F. Buckley, Henry Luce, and James Jesus Angleton covered up the truth behind Kennedy's death as well) in 1991 exposing a conspiracy of JFK's death and cover up, he should of talking about Building Number 7 and other issues in 9/11. Robert Kennedy Jr. is right to point out voting fraud. In fact, Diebold voting system was easily hacked plus 80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies: Diebold and ES&S.
So much has been said about the Jesus Camp. Here's my impressions of it. The Jesus Camp is right to be serious about real issues like abortion, religious liberty, etc. I disagree with them that they should pray over an image of George W. Bush. First, it is unscriptural to use images in worship of God period. Second, there is nothing wrong with praying for George W. Bush or our leaders, yet it is wrong to have a total alliegance to a party. Real men have alleigance to God alone not to the Republicans or the Democrats (both parties have done errors in its history then and now). The good news is that many real conservative Christians aren't Bushbots and are really exposing real issues. Some in the media like MSNBC and ABC are talking about. Some brainwashed liberals might even believe that Bush is a real conservative Christian. Bush is part of occult Secret societies, claimed that Muslims and Christians worship the same God, and supports Planned Parenthood, so George W. Bush isn't a conservative Christian. Bush (who called for a new order of the ages) is an internationalist aligning himself with CFR in calling for a North American Union.
Life isn't over for me yet. There are much more to do while I'm on this Earth. I've been thinking about evolution lately. Recently, more and more scientists reject some of its tenets. Darwinian Evolution have a hatred of the laws of nature dispulated that nothing can't create anything and that life tens to detilorate over time (not get more organized) naturally. As for me, I'm moving forward. I'm going to expose the CFR, the Jesuits, Knights of Malta, the CFR, the Masonic Labor Zionists (with people like Shimon Peres who was trained by Jesuits in Poland. I do believe in Israel's right to exist though and I respect the good contributions done by Jewish peopel throughout history also), Opus Dei, The Club of Rome, the Bilderberg Group, Pilgrim Society, Skulls and Bones, Bohemian Grove, and every other evil/globalist group under the sun. I won't limit myself into blaming one nation, one religion, or one race for all of ills in the world, which is morally wrong. I want to make it clear that I'm against open borders, against toll road taxes, and against the Iraq war. The rise of biotechnology, biometrics, and wars makes the present and the furture dangerous. Controversial and false religions like the Jehovah Witness, Scientology, Mormonism, etc. are ever with us. Well, the regular headlines should make anyone down. If you place your faith in the Lord and do what is right (and holy), then you will go to Heaven.
By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
WING TV Trashes RBN Host
From http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=579
WING TV Trashes RBN Host
Thursday September 28th 2006, 11:59 am
In yet another self-destructive turn of the worm, the dynamic duo of the internet radio show WING TV have trashed D. L. Abrahamson, host of Republic Broadcasting Network’s False Flag News.
According to Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani, Abrahamson is a “disinfo artist” not only because he does not agree with Thorn and Guliani’s take on the events of September 11, 2001, but also because he is Jewish.
“We realize that Stadtmiller wants to reach a younger audience, but why resort to a 23-year old Jewish disinformation artist that promotes hip hop, worships at the altar of Alex Jones (who also runs a massive Zionist protection racket), and pushes the worst in 9-11 skullduggery? If Stadtmiller’s trying to put a younger face on the 9-11 movement, couldn’t he at least find one that tells the truth?” write the dynamic duo.
WING TV presents a litany of “evidence” indicating Abrahamson is a disinfo operative. For instance, Abrahamson’s belief a plane hit the Pentagon, the planes were hijacked, Mohammad Atta was a double agent, Muslims want to destroy America, and more.
I tend to believe a plane did not hit the Pentagon, based on photographic evidence (and such evidence is hardly conclusive), but I respect the opinion of others who think otherwise. I don’t call such people disinfo artists working for a refashioned version of COINTELPRO because they believe differently than I do. Since we do not have enough evidence to indicate otherwise, there is no reason to believe hijackers did not commandeered the flights on nine eleven.
Many researchers believe the planes were remotely controlled, but again there is scant evidence of this, although the technology certainly exists. I don’t recall Abrahamson calling Atta a double agent, although I do recall his mentioning Atta attended the International Officers School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama, as well as the Defense Language Institute at Monterey, California, a fact reported by Newsweek, although this has since found its way down the memory hole (the article was archived by Thorn and Guliani nemesis, Alex Jones, on his Prison Planet web site).
Finally, one would have to live in a cave similar to the one Osama bin Laden lived in to not believe there is a small number of Muslims out there who want to destroy America. Of course, it is another matter entirely if they actually possess the capability to do so, regardless of the campfire stories pedaled by our neocon rulers.
Above all else, Thorn and Guliani find Abrahamson suspect because of his Jewish heritage. Abrahamson’s sin is that he “conveniently forgot to stress Israel’s long history of terrorism and illegal spying,” apparently a result of “his last name.” In fact, Abrahamson has repeatedly mentioned on his radio show Israeli terrorism and, above all, the Zionist link to the neocons.
Obviously, the problem is that Abrahamson does not believe, as Thorn and Guliani do, that nine eleven was strictly a product of evil and malicious Zionists, never mind the lack of any explanation how Israeli Zionists managed to make NORAD stand down. It is an established fact Israel was involved in sheparding Atta and crew, but then so was German intelligence.
And no doubt, as well, there is a direct link between the Likudites in Israel and the Straussian neocons now in control of the Bush White House and the Pentagon. It is fair to say that Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Marsh & McLellan, AIG, Dyncorp, and a laundry list of other corporate and multinational interests were also involved in the conspiracy, or at least benefited.
Do the Jews control all of these interests as well?
Obviously, Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani have joined the racist Eric Hufschmid in sharing a “Jew under every rock” paranoia. I find this racist finger pointing as destructive as any modern version of COINTELPRO. If Eric Hufschmid had his way, every Jew in the truth movement would be corralled into a ghetto until the pall of suspicion dissipated.
None of this bodes well for the “movement,” as fractured and split by infantile factionalism as it is.
In order to demonstrate how ludicrous all of this is, consider that Horowitz neocons have pegged your humble blogger an “antisemite” and “Holocaust denier” while on the other end of the spectrum Judophobes such as Daryl Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid consider me a “crypto-Jew” and part of an illusory Jewish criminal network, minus absolutely any evidence, of course.
In 1970 I was an antiwar activist followed around by the real McCoy—COINTELPRO operatives dispatched by the Michigan State Police “Red Squad.” Of course, back in the day, there were millions of Americans opposed to the Vietnam War, literally hundreds of thousands of activists, and this posed a sincere threat to the government, and the FBI, DIA, and the CIA were dispatched to take down the movement.
Now?
It appears what passes for a “movement” can be hobbled by a few loudmouths on the internet, casting aspersion and unsubstantiated claims of disinfo skullduggery.
It is sincerely disgusting and even more ridiculous.
WING TV Trashes RBN Host
Thursday September 28th 2006, 11:59 am
In yet another self-destructive turn of the worm, the dynamic duo of the internet radio show WING TV have trashed D. L. Abrahamson, host of Republic Broadcasting Network’s False Flag News.
According to Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani, Abrahamson is a “disinfo artist” not only because he does not agree with Thorn and Guliani’s take on the events of September 11, 2001, but also because he is Jewish.
“We realize that Stadtmiller wants to reach a younger audience, but why resort to a 23-year old Jewish disinformation artist that promotes hip hop, worships at the altar of Alex Jones (who also runs a massive Zionist protection racket), and pushes the worst in 9-11 skullduggery? If Stadtmiller’s trying to put a younger face on the 9-11 movement, couldn’t he at least find one that tells the truth?” write the dynamic duo.
WING TV presents a litany of “evidence” indicating Abrahamson is a disinfo operative. For instance, Abrahamson’s belief a plane hit the Pentagon, the planes were hijacked, Mohammad Atta was a double agent, Muslims want to destroy America, and more.
I tend to believe a plane did not hit the Pentagon, based on photographic evidence (and such evidence is hardly conclusive), but I respect the opinion of others who think otherwise. I don’t call such people disinfo artists working for a refashioned version of COINTELPRO because they believe differently than I do. Since we do not have enough evidence to indicate otherwise, there is no reason to believe hijackers did not commandeered the flights on nine eleven.
Many researchers believe the planes were remotely controlled, but again there is scant evidence of this, although the technology certainly exists. I don’t recall Abrahamson calling Atta a double agent, although I do recall his mentioning Atta attended the International Officers School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama, as well as the Defense Language Institute at Monterey, California, a fact reported by Newsweek, although this has since found its way down the memory hole (the article was archived by Thorn and Guliani nemesis, Alex Jones, on his Prison Planet web site).
Finally, one would have to live in a cave similar to the one Osama bin Laden lived in to not believe there is a small number of Muslims out there who want to destroy America. Of course, it is another matter entirely if they actually possess the capability to do so, regardless of the campfire stories pedaled by our neocon rulers.
Above all else, Thorn and Guliani find Abrahamson suspect because of his Jewish heritage. Abrahamson’s sin is that he “conveniently forgot to stress Israel’s long history of terrorism and illegal spying,” apparently a result of “his last name.” In fact, Abrahamson has repeatedly mentioned on his radio show Israeli terrorism and, above all, the Zionist link to the neocons.
Obviously, the problem is that Abrahamson does not believe, as Thorn and Guliani do, that nine eleven was strictly a product of evil and malicious Zionists, never mind the lack of any explanation how Israeli Zionists managed to make NORAD stand down. It is an established fact Israel was involved in sheparding Atta and crew, but then so was German intelligence.
And no doubt, as well, there is a direct link between the Likudites in Israel and the Straussian neocons now in control of the Bush White House and the Pentagon. It is fair to say that Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Marsh & McLellan, AIG, Dyncorp, and a laundry list of other corporate and multinational interests were also involved in the conspiracy, or at least benefited.
Do the Jews control all of these interests as well?
Obviously, Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani have joined the racist Eric Hufschmid in sharing a “Jew under every rock” paranoia. I find this racist finger pointing as destructive as any modern version of COINTELPRO. If Eric Hufschmid had his way, every Jew in the truth movement would be corralled into a ghetto until the pall of suspicion dissipated.
None of this bodes well for the “movement,” as fractured and split by infantile factionalism as it is.
In order to demonstrate how ludicrous all of this is, consider that Horowitz neocons have pegged your humble blogger an “antisemite” and “Holocaust denier” while on the other end of the spectrum Judophobes such as Daryl Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid consider me a “crypto-Jew” and part of an illusory Jewish criminal network, minus absolutely any evidence, of course.
In 1970 I was an antiwar activist followed around by the real McCoy—COINTELPRO operatives dispatched by the Michigan State Police “Red Squad.” Of course, back in the day, there were millions of Americans opposed to the Vietnam War, literally hundreds of thousands of activists, and this posed a sincere threat to the government, and the FBI, DIA, and the CIA were dispatched to take down the movement.
Now?
It appears what passes for a “movement” can be hobbled by a few loudmouths on the internet, casting aspersion and unsubstantiated claims of disinfo skullduggery.
It is sincerely disgusting and even more ridiculous.
The Perjured Nation by Scott Whiteman
From http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=422
The Perjured Nation
by Scott Whiteman
Printer friendly E-Mail this page
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. Deu. 5:11Thou shalt fear the LORD thy God, and serve him,and shalt swear by his name.Deu. 6:13.Hallowed by thy Name. Mat. 6:9, The First Petition.
In these two commandments and the first Petition of the Our Father, we learn that
God does not take kindly to the profanation of His name,
that you may not avoid Oath-taking to avoid perjury and
His Name will be made holy and revered. You shalt swear by his name. This too is a command. We are commanded to take Oaths in God’s Name. But when we do, it ought to be done in solemnity, reverence and fear.
The Geneva BibleThus, the duties required by the Third Commandment are greater than merely refraining from obvious blasphemy. We are prohibited from taking the Name of God in vain, irreverent or superstitious (sic.) means. Therefore, we must refrain from using God’s name in all instances which through rote repetition it has lost any significant religious meaning. If, when taking an Oath, or even when you pray, you invoke the Name of God or His Christ without due reverence, you have committed a violation of the Third Commandment. This requires repentance, and fleeing to Christ for forgiveness. We have all done this, myself included, so let us pray together to refrain from such trivial use of His Name in the future. Before we can expect change in the public profanation of the Name of God, we need to privately refrain from profaning it ourselves.Any nation will be blessed to take God’s name in their Oaths when done with reverence, honour and solemnity. Similarly, any nation that does not take God’s name in their Oaths, or which blasphemes God’s name in their Oaths, is cursed and under judgment. Perhaps, then, a review of America’s habitual Oath taking and invocation of His Name to determine whether our Nation has profaned the Name of God is in order.
The Honorable Roy S. Moore.Official policy of the United States government about the use of God’s name in public is defined in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1972).
According to the “Lemon Test”, Oaths, religious expressions, prayers, invocations like “God save this honorable court,” prayer vigils, placards, scenes of Moses on the Rotunda, Ten Commandments monuments (sometimes), &c. do not violate the separation of Church and State because they serve a secular purpose and do not have as their primary effect the advancement or inhibition of religion. In these pluralistic States, you will be permitted to invoke God’s name and aid only when it has “lost through rote repetition any significant religious content,” or, as Chief Justice Roy Moore has repeatedly pointed out, when you don’t mean it. Going one step further than the Chief Justice has to my knowledge, you may take the name of the Lord God only when you profane it. TV is full of such obvious profanations of God’s name under the doctrine “freedom of speech.”However, we cannot seek to avoid the profanation of His name by removing it from the culture. Removing “So help me God” from Oaths would not avoid profanation of His name. As the scripture demonstrates, profanation occurs when we refrain from “using of God’s name as is required” Westminster Larger Catechism Q.113; Deu. 6:13; Mal. 2:2. Absence of His Name when it is required is as much a violation of the Third Commandment as when we use His Name inappropriately.Thus, the removal of Oaths and God’s Name from the culture would not solve our blasphemy problem.
U.S Supreme Court Justice Joseph StorySo if we are required to take Oaths in God’s Name, and America does in fact do this both officially and by historical precedent, perhaps a review of the duties required in those Oaths is in order to determine whether we have profaned God’s Name. The federal government in America is established on a series of Oaths. The President takes an Oath to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1, cl.8. By the terms of the Constitution, “Senators and Representatives [of the United States], and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.” U.S. Const., Art. VI, cl.3. States’ officers take their own Oaths. Lawyers take Oaths to their States’ constitutions as well as the Federal Constitution. At every admission ceremony, whether “So help me God” is administered in the Oath, Oaths occur that place a “solemn obligation upon the minds of all reflecting men, and especially upon those, who feel a deep sense of accountability to a Supreme Being.” Joseph Story, Commentaries on the United States Constitution (Abridged by the Author), §969.
So rather than merely being content to impose an Oath upon Federal officers, by putting State officers under Oath to the terms of the Constitution, we have either glorified God and multiplied our expected blessing, or compounded our trespass against Him. Given the gravity of Oath taking, why are State officers bound to the United States Constitution? Isn’t the United States Constitution an instrument of the Federal government? There are several reasons. There are times when the Executive of a state may be called upon to make an appointment to the Senate if the Legislature is out of session, or he may be required to issue a writ of election, or officer the militia in the fulfillment of a proper and Constitutional Federal law. State’s Judges may be asked to render decisions on the Federal Constitution. The Legislatures, at the time of the ratification, appointed Senators, constituted the Electors for President and served some other functions. Since the States were parties of the contract (U.S. Constitution), it is reasonable to expect that they would be loyal to it as well as the State government.The key is to look at the object of the Oath and the Oath-takers loyalty. It is not the Federal government – it is the Constitution, under God (because if the Constitution has an ungodly provision, we cannot keep that provision without offense to God).
There are times when the Federal Government oversteps its bounds. When it does, it becomes incumbent on the State authorities to call it back into line, according to the terms of the Constitution to which they jointly have sworn an Oath. Placing onto Governors, States’ Legislators and Judges the duty of compliance with the United States Constitution, in addition to their own Oaths to their States’ Constitution, all lesser magistrates have had imposed upon them the Oath-bound duty to interpose themselves between the Federal government and the people within their jurisdiction when the Federal government has overstepped its bounds. If they fail to interpose, they have breached their Oath, committed perjury and profaned the Name of God.Before the year 1800, the Federal government overstepped its Constitutional boundaries when John Adams passed the Alien & Sedition Acts, creating federal crimes that were not permissible according to the Constitution. On December 24, 1798, Virginia interposed itself stating “that the acts aforesaid, are unconstitutional; and, that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each for co-operating with this State, in maintaining unimpaired the authorities, rights and liberties, reserved to the State respectively, or to the people.” Virginia Resolutions, cl. 7. The Officers of the Commonwealth had all sworn an Oath to the United States Constitution. Therefore, the Officers of the Commonwealth were required, if called, to enforce the Laws of the United States in their jurisdiction. Yet Virginia declared her refusal to cooperate with this law if called to it. How could Virginia do this without violation of the Oath?According to the Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const., Art. VI, §2, the Constitution and only laws made in pursuance to it are the Supreme Law of the Land.
Therefore an unconstitutional law is no law and to permit the Alien & Sedition Acts to stand would be to act contrary to their Oath taken to the United States Constitution. Virginia would not participate in the execution of the Acts and would actually work against its enforcement by others within its borders. Virginia would not profane the Name of God by allowing the Alien & Sedition Acts to stand in the Commonwealth. Why is this important? Oath-taking is an act of Worship codified in the United States Constitution. It is an act of Worship of the God who declares in His Word how He wants to be worshiped. Any violation of that Regulative Principle is a profanation of His Name. Any violation of the Oath of office profanes God’s Name.The oath of office … cannot be unheeded without perjury.Oaths of office. … Every magistrate, who violates the laws, which he has sworn to execute, is guilty of perjury. Every legislator, who has sworn to maintain the Constitution under which he is acting, and then is led away by selfish or sectional considerations, is perjured. And the executive officer, who for fear or favour, for bribe or reward, fails to do all he has sworn to do, is also a perjured wretch. The commonness of these sins does in no degree whatever abate their enormity. William S. Plumer, D.D., Law of God, (1864), reprinted by Sprinkle Publications, Harrisonburg, Virginia (1996), pp. 392, 268.
Emphasis mine.The only way to avoid profanation of God’s name is to take Oaths in His Name, with due reverence, and seek His aid, “So help me God,” in the fulfillment of your Oaths. But when, as a State official, you enforce or connive at the enforcement of a federal law that is unconstitutional, you have committed perjury of your Oath of Office and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. When an attorney seeks to enforce a Statute or Regulation against an adversary that is unconstitutional, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
When a police officer executes a roadblock; issues a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt or any other tools of the petty blue-light tyranny, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.When a Sheriff prevents the law abiding citizens of his country from owning or carrying firearms; does not stop the FBI from coming into his county to execute a federal warrant; refrains from shutting abortion mills where he knows murders occur on a regular basis; &c., he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.When a State Legislator fails to offer Articles of Interposition striking down Roe v. Wade as an unconstitutional federal usurpation of powers, or does not try to stop federal monies from being spent in his state for faith-based initiatives or constitution education programs, &c. he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. When a governor cashes a check from the United States Department of Treasury for education or other unconstitutional programs in his state, or he fails to stand between the Federal government, doctors and women intent on murder and the unborn citizens of his State, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
When the State Legislature fails to pass Articles of Interposition striking down all unconstitutional federal usurpations including the unconstitutional judicial usurpation in Roe v. Wade, it, as well as each individual member who did not offer or support such a measure has committed perjury, and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. When the President refuses to enforce immigration laws; grants amnesty to border criminals; expresses his intention to stand behind Roe v. Wade; expresses his intention to enforce the Regulations of the Department of Education, Environmental Protection Agency and other unconstitutional regulative agencies; spends monies on the National Endowment of the Arts; keeps national forests and federal property that is other than forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, the District of Columbia; nominates Judges who are known to have taken an Oath contrary to the United States Constitution to affirm Roe v. Wadeas the law of the land; he has become a perjured wretch.
The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.Whensoever an American citizen, Christian or not, votes for any magistrate who has expressed his intention to commit perjury, or has demonstrated his intention to profane the Name of God through past unconstitutional acts, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.Christian, we are a perjured Nation. Our magistrates continually violate their Oaths of office and Evangelical conservatives continue to vote them in. The name of God is blasphemed among the heathen through you. Rom. 2:24 We are, as a perjured Nation, worse off than the heathen nations. Do not excuse yourself by claiming to vote for the lesser evil, nor salve your conscience claiming that you would have been outvoted. Is not the power of God greater than a supermajority of Americans? Is it not within the power of God to pull the foundations from under the wicked? Psa. 73. The above referenced author, William S. Plumer, in the same work wrote, “[Profanation of the Lord’s name] diminishes reverence for God, relaxes the force of solemn oaths, and prepares men for perjury and general irreligion. If the people of this nation continue thus to insult the Most High, we may look for even more dire calamities than are now, (1864) in the midst of civil war, poured upon us out of the vials of God’s wrath.” Plumer, Law of God, 274. Plumer, a Southerner, believed that the nation was involved in war because it had profaned the Name of God.
Would God embroil “His people” in war for their sin? Consider the burden of Habakkuk who watched as Judah profaned God’s Name and asked God when He would act. God responded that he was calling up the Chaldeans to remove Judah from the land. For the time has come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin with us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the Gospel of God? And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear? 1 Pet. 4:17-18.I pray that the profanation of God’s Name in America will stop and He will not call forward a bitter and hasty nation (Hab. 1:6) to destroy America and dispossess Americans from the land. If He does, the Christian Remnant can rest in God’s sovereignty. But the Evangelical Conservatives best take warning and flee to Christ for forgiveness. He can, has, and may again, use a nation that hates Him but has not dragged His name through the mire to destroy one, like the United States, that has.
Download a PDF of this aritcle (149 kb)—Scott T. Whiteman is a Reformed Christian, husband, and father of three. He is a practicing attorney in the State of Maryland, and served as Campaign Manager for Michael A. Peroutka as he ran for President in 2004. He is available for radio or TV interviews, or for speeches, by contacting him at (410) 760-7897 or scott@theamericanview.comAs Published in The National Reform Association’s Journal, The Christian Statesman, Vol. 148, No. 4 (July-August 2005) at 25.
Discuss this article
The Perjured Nation
by Scott Whiteman
Printer friendly E-Mail this page
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. Deu. 5:11Thou shalt fear the LORD thy God, and serve him,and shalt swear by his name.Deu. 6:13.Hallowed by thy Name. Mat. 6:9, The First Petition.
In these two commandments and the first Petition of the Our Father, we learn that
God does not take kindly to the profanation of His name,
that you may not avoid Oath-taking to avoid perjury and
His Name will be made holy and revered. You shalt swear by his name. This too is a command. We are commanded to take Oaths in God’s Name. But when we do, it ought to be done in solemnity, reverence and fear.
The Geneva BibleThus, the duties required by the Third Commandment are greater than merely refraining from obvious blasphemy. We are prohibited from taking the Name of God in vain, irreverent or superstitious (sic.) means. Therefore, we must refrain from using God’s name in all instances which through rote repetition it has lost any significant religious meaning. If, when taking an Oath, or even when you pray, you invoke the Name of God or His Christ without due reverence, you have committed a violation of the Third Commandment. This requires repentance, and fleeing to Christ for forgiveness. We have all done this, myself included, so let us pray together to refrain from such trivial use of His Name in the future. Before we can expect change in the public profanation of the Name of God, we need to privately refrain from profaning it ourselves.Any nation will be blessed to take God’s name in their Oaths when done with reverence, honour and solemnity. Similarly, any nation that does not take God’s name in their Oaths, or which blasphemes God’s name in their Oaths, is cursed and under judgment. Perhaps, then, a review of America’s habitual Oath taking and invocation of His Name to determine whether our Nation has profaned the Name of God is in order.
The Honorable Roy S. Moore.Official policy of the United States government about the use of God’s name in public is defined in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1972).
According to the “Lemon Test”, Oaths, religious expressions, prayers, invocations like “God save this honorable court,” prayer vigils, placards, scenes of Moses on the Rotunda, Ten Commandments monuments (sometimes), &c. do not violate the separation of Church and State because they serve a secular purpose and do not have as their primary effect the advancement or inhibition of religion. In these pluralistic States, you will be permitted to invoke God’s name and aid only when it has “lost through rote repetition any significant religious content,” or, as Chief Justice Roy Moore has repeatedly pointed out, when you don’t mean it. Going one step further than the Chief Justice has to my knowledge, you may take the name of the Lord God only when you profane it. TV is full of such obvious profanations of God’s name under the doctrine “freedom of speech.”However, we cannot seek to avoid the profanation of His name by removing it from the culture. Removing “So help me God” from Oaths would not avoid profanation of His name. As the scripture demonstrates, profanation occurs when we refrain from “using of God’s name as is required” Westminster Larger Catechism Q.113; Deu. 6:13; Mal. 2:2. Absence of His Name when it is required is as much a violation of the Third Commandment as when we use His Name inappropriately.Thus, the removal of Oaths and God’s Name from the culture would not solve our blasphemy problem.
U.S Supreme Court Justice Joseph StorySo if we are required to take Oaths in God’s Name, and America does in fact do this both officially and by historical precedent, perhaps a review of the duties required in those Oaths is in order to determine whether we have profaned God’s Name. The federal government in America is established on a series of Oaths. The President takes an Oath to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1, cl.8. By the terms of the Constitution, “Senators and Representatives [of the United States], and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.” U.S. Const., Art. VI, cl.3. States’ officers take their own Oaths. Lawyers take Oaths to their States’ constitutions as well as the Federal Constitution. At every admission ceremony, whether “So help me God” is administered in the Oath, Oaths occur that place a “solemn obligation upon the minds of all reflecting men, and especially upon those, who feel a deep sense of accountability to a Supreme Being.” Joseph Story, Commentaries on the United States Constitution (Abridged by the Author), §969.
So rather than merely being content to impose an Oath upon Federal officers, by putting State officers under Oath to the terms of the Constitution, we have either glorified God and multiplied our expected blessing, or compounded our trespass against Him. Given the gravity of Oath taking, why are State officers bound to the United States Constitution? Isn’t the United States Constitution an instrument of the Federal government? There are several reasons. There are times when the Executive of a state may be called upon to make an appointment to the Senate if the Legislature is out of session, or he may be required to issue a writ of election, or officer the militia in the fulfillment of a proper and Constitutional Federal law. State’s Judges may be asked to render decisions on the Federal Constitution. The Legislatures, at the time of the ratification, appointed Senators, constituted the Electors for President and served some other functions. Since the States were parties of the contract (U.S. Constitution), it is reasonable to expect that they would be loyal to it as well as the State government.The key is to look at the object of the Oath and the Oath-takers loyalty. It is not the Federal government – it is the Constitution, under God (because if the Constitution has an ungodly provision, we cannot keep that provision without offense to God).
There are times when the Federal Government oversteps its bounds. When it does, it becomes incumbent on the State authorities to call it back into line, according to the terms of the Constitution to which they jointly have sworn an Oath. Placing onto Governors, States’ Legislators and Judges the duty of compliance with the United States Constitution, in addition to their own Oaths to their States’ Constitution, all lesser magistrates have had imposed upon them the Oath-bound duty to interpose themselves between the Federal government and the people within their jurisdiction when the Federal government has overstepped its bounds. If they fail to interpose, they have breached their Oath, committed perjury and profaned the Name of God.Before the year 1800, the Federal government overstepped its Constitutional boundaries when John Adams passed the Alien & Sedition Acts, creating federal crimes that were not permissible according to the Constitution. On December 24, 1798, Virginia interposed itself stating “that the acts aforesaid, are unconstitutional; and, that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each for co-operating with this State, in maintaining unimpaired the authorities, rights and liberties, reserved to the State respectively, or to the people.” Virginia Resolutions, cl. 7. The Officers of the Commonwealth had all sworn an Oath to the United States Constitution. Therefore, the Officers of the Commonwealth were required, if called, to enforce the Laws of the United States in their jurisdiction. Yet Virginia declared her refusal to cooperate with this law if called to it. How could Virginia do this without violation of the Oath?According to the Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const., Art. VI, §2, the Constitution and only laws made in pursuance to it are the Supreme Law of the Land.
Therefore an unconstitutional law is no law and to permit the Alien & Sedition Acts to stand would be to act contrary to their Oath taken to the United States Constitution. Virginia would not participate in the execution of the Acts and would actually work against its enforcement by others within its borders. Virginia would not profane the Name of God by allowing the Alien & Sedition Acts to stand in the Commonwealth. Why is this important? Oath-taking is an act of Worship codified in the United States Constitution. It is an act of Worship of the God who declares in His Word how He wants to be worshiped. Any violation of that Regulative Principle is a profanation of His Name. Any violation of the Oath of office profanes God’s Name.The oath of office … cannot be unheeded without perjury.Oaths of office. … Every magistrate, who violates the laws, which he has sworn to execute, is guilty of perjury. Every legislator, who has sworn to maintain the Constitution under which he is acting, and then is led away by selfish or sectional considerations, is perjured. And the executive officer, who for fear or favour, for bribe or reward, fails to do all he has sworn to do, is also a perjured wretch. The commonness of these sins does in no degree whatever abate their enormity. William S. Plumer, D.D., Law of God, (1864), reprinted by Sprinkle Publications, Harrisonburg, Virginia (1996), pp. 392, 268.
Emphasis mine.The only way to avoid profanation of God’s name is to take Oaths in His Name, with due reverence, and seek His aid, “So help me God,” in the fulfillment of your Oaths. But when, as a State official, you enforce or connive at the enforcement of a federal law that is unconstitutional, you have committed perjury of your Oath of Office and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. When an attorney seeks to enforce a Statute or Regulation against an adversary that is unconstitutional, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
When a police officer executes a roadblock; issues a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt or any other tools of the petty blue-light tyranny, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.When a Sheriff prevents the law abiding citizens of his country from owning or carrying firearms; does not stop the FBI from coming into his county to execute a federal warrant; refrains from shutting abortion mills where he knows murders occur on a regular basis; &c., he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.When a State Legislator fails to offer Articles of Interposition striking down Roe v. Wade as an unconstitutional federal usurpation of powers, or does not try to stop federal monies from being spent in his state for faith-based initiatives or constitution education programs, &c. he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. When a governor cashes a check from the United States Department of Treasury for education or other unconstitutional programs in his state, or he fails to stand between the Federal government, doctors and women intent on murder and the unborn citizens of his State, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
When the State Legislature fails to pass Articles of Interposition striking down all unconstitutional federal usurpations including the unconstitutional judicial usurpation in Roe v. Wade, it, as well as each individual member who did not offer or support such a measure has committed perjury, and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. When the President refuses to enforce immigration laws; grants amnesty to border criminals; expresses his intention to stand behind Roe v. Wade; expresses his intention to enforce the Regulations of the Department of Education, Environmental Protection Agency and other unconstitutional regulative agencies; spends monies on the National Endowment of the Arts; keeps national forests and federal property that is other than forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, the District of Columbia; nominates Judges who are known to have taken an Oath contrary to the United States Constitution to affirm Roe v. Wadeas the law of the land; he has become a perjured wretch.
The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.Whensoever an American citizen, Christian or not, votes for any magistrate who has expressed his intention to commit perjury, or has demonstrated his intention to profane the Name of God through past unconstitutional acts, he has committed perjury and The LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.Christian, we are a perjured Nation. Our magistrates continually violate their Oaths of office and Evangelical conservatives continue to vote them in. The name of God is blasphemed among the heathen through you. Rom. 2:24 We are, as a perjured Nation, worse off than the heathen nations. Do not excuse yourself by claiming to vote for the lesser evil, nor salve your conscience claiming that you would have been outvoted. Is not the power of God greater than a supermajority of Americans? Is it not within the power of God to pull the foundations from under the wicked? Psa. 73. The above referenced author, William S. Plumer, in the same work wrote, “[Profanation of the Lord’s name] diminishes reverence for God, relaxes the force of solemn oaths, and prepares men for perjury and general irreligion. If the people of this nation continue thus to insult the Most High, we may look for even more dire calamities than are now, (1864) in the midst of civil war, poured upon us out of the vials of God’s wrath.” Plumer, Law of God, 274. Plumer, a Southerner, believed that the nation was involved in war because it had profaned the Name of God.
Would God embroil “His people” in war for their sin? Consider the burden of Habakkuk who watched as Judah profaned God’s Name and asked God when He would act. God responded that he was calling up the Chaldeans to remove Judah from the land. For the time has come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin with us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the Gospel of God? And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear? 1 Pet. 4:17-18.I pray that the profanation of God’s Name in America will stop and He will not call forward a bitter and hasty nation (Hab. 1:6) to destroy America and dispossess Americans from the land. If He does, the Christian Remnant can rest in God’s sovereignty. But the Evangelical Conservatives best take warning and flee to Christ for forgiveness. He can, has, and may again, use a nation that hates Him but has not dragged His name through the mire to destroy one, like the United States, that has.
Download a PDF of this aritcle (149 kb)—Scott T. Whiteman is a Reformed Christian, husband, and father of three. He is a practicing attorney in the State of Maryland, and served as Campaign Manager for Michael A. Peroutka as he ran for President in 2004. He is available for radio or TV interviews, or for speeches, by contacting him at (410) 760-7897 or scott@theamericanview.comAs Published in The National Reform Association’s Journal, The Christian Statesman, Vol. 148, No. 4 (July-August 2005) at 25.
Discuss this article
Cafferty: "What Are We Becoming?"
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/September2006/290906Cafferty.htm
Cafferty: "What Are We Becoming?"
You Tube September 29 2006
Cafferty struck a somber tone tonight after the House passed legislation that includes a war crimes immunity clause. He rightfully asks, "what are we becoming?"
Cafferty: President Bush is trying to pardon himself. Here's the deal: Under the War Crimes Act, violations of the Geneva Conventions are felonies, in some cases punishable by death. When the Supreme Court ruled that the Geneva Convention applied to al Qaeda and Taliban detainees, President Bush and his boys were suddenly in big trouble. They've been working these prisoners over pretty good. In an effort to avoid possible prosecution they're trying to cram this bill through Congress before the end of the week before Congress adjourns. The reason there's such a rush to do this? If the Democrats get control of the House in November this kind of legislation probably wouldn't pass.
You wanna know the real disgrace about what these people are about to do or are in the process of doing? Senator Bill Frist and Congressman Dennis Hastert and their Republican stooges apparently don't see anything wrong with this. I really do wonder sometimes what we're becoming in this country.
Cafferty: "What Are We Becoming?"
You Tube September 29 2006
Cafferty struck a somber tone tonight after the House passed legislation that includes a war crimes immunity clause. He rightfully asks, "what are we becoming?"
Cafferty: President Bush is trying to pardon himself. Here's the deal: Under the War Crimes Act, violations of the Geneva Conventions are felonies, in some cases punishable by death. When the Supreme Court ruled that the Geneva Convention applied to al Qaeda and Taliban detainees, President Bush and his boys were suddenly in big trouble. They've been working these prisoners over pretty good. In an effort to avoid possible prosecution they're trying to cram this bill through Congress before the end of the week before Congress adjourns. The reason there's such a rush to do this? If the Democrats get control of the House in November this kind of legislation probably wouldn't pass.
You wanna know the real disgrace about what these people are about to do or are in the process of doing? Senator Bill Frist and Congressman Dennis Hastert and their Republican stooges apparently don't see anything wrong with this. I really do wonder sometimes what we're becoming in this country.
Enslaved, Butchered Chinese Need a Thai-Style RevolutionQuestion For The State Department: Are Illegal Organ Transplants Still An Urban Myth?
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/280906enslavedchinese.htm
Enslaved, Butchered Chinese Need a Thai-Style RevolutionQuestion For The State Department: Are Illegal Organ Transplants Still An Urban Myth?
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com September 28 2006
Just over a year ago the U.S. State Department issued a press release on its website that sought to debunk alleged "conspiracy theories" and help people identify misinformation. One of those "urban myths" was the illegal trade in the sale of organs. There is no truth to the rumor that the State Department was able to accurately verify the existence of the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus.
The practice of the despotic Communist Chinese government coordinating a policy whereby political dissidents, peaceful religious practitioners and the homeless are rounded up, kept in prisons, and butchered upon the whim of a rich westerner requiring a new kidney has been known for years.
A new undercover BBC report only further confirms this ghoulish affront to human dignity and goes further in revealing that organs are particularly plentiful during the holiday season - because there are more public executions from which victim's organs are harvested.
The State Department classifies the existence of an illegal trade that murders people for their organs as "unfounded fears."
I demand the State Department retract its ridiculous denial of the existence of the illegal organ trade and remove every page which trashes truth activists as urban myth progenitors. You should do the same by e mailing them. The real protagonist of urban myths is the State Department itself - well versed in its role as government apologist in chief, and central in the promulgation of another "urban myth," the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
China is hailed as a world role model by the UN and pontificating scumbags in business suits graciously applaud its economic success while the country's communist tyrants craft policies of brutally enforced sterilization, relocation and abortion. And when Chinese dissidents in the US attempt to blow the whistle on these Mengele-style practices, they are vilified by the American media, the so-called watchdogs of the "land of the free."
More like land of the cowards, home of the slaves.
While Americans get fat and obsess about Paris Hilton's DUI, their government openly writes legislation authorizing the sexual molestation and torture of children.
Meanwhile, infuriated Chinese peasant farmers in the south revolt against the brutal PLA armed with nothing more than spades and garden forks.
Shame on America - we thought the entrenched legacy established by the founding fathers would never be displaced in the eyes of history but the past two generations of U.S. citizens are doing their level best to ensure the country will be defined by its populace of gutless sheep who have about as much backbone as a dead jellyfish.
But don't expect China to be kicked out of the UN - that oh so benevolent organization is too busy giving "cultural diversity" awards to brutal dictators who like to boil innocent people alive.
Chinese dissidents need to rise up, organize and form a united front against their mass murdering hereditary dictatorship government or sell their own children into slavery for generations to come. They need to enact a Thai-style coup and politically decapitate their oppressors even at the risk of a 21st century Tiananmen Square.
The tree of liberty needs to be occasionally watered by the blood of patriots. I challenge the Chinese people to throw off the illusory chains these human worms have shackled upon you and be remembered in eternity for standing up for what matters.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Enslaved, Butchered Chinese Need a Thai-Style RevolutionQuestion For The State Department: Are Illegal Organ Transplants Still An Urban Myth?
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com September 28 2006
Just over a year ago the U.S. State Department issued a press release on its website that sought to debunk alleged "conspiracy theories" and help people identify misinformation. One of those "urban myths" was the illegal trade in the sale of organs. There is no truth to the rumor that the State Department was able to accurately verify the existence of the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus.
The practice of the despotic Communist Chinese government coordinating a policy whereby political dissidents, peaceful religious practitioners and the homeless are rounded up, kept in prisons, and butchered upon the whim of a rich westerner requiring a new kidney has been known for years.
A new undercover BBC report only further confirms this ghoulish affront to human dignity and goes further in revealing that organs are particularly plentiful during the holiday season - because there are more public executions from which victim's organs are harvested.
The State Department classifies the existence of an illegal trade that murders people for their organs as "unfounded fears."
I demand the State Department retract its ridiculous denial of the existence of the illegal organ trade and remove every page which trashes truth activists as urban myth progenitors. You should do the same by e mailing them. The real protagonist of urban myths is the State Department itself - well versed in its role as government apologist in chief, and central in the promulgation of another "urban myth," the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
China is hailed as a world role model by the UN and pontificating scumbags in business suits graciously applaud its economic success while the country's communist tyrants craft policies of brutally enforced sterilization, relocation and abortion. And when Chinese dissidents in the US attempt to blow the whistle on these Mengele-style practices, they are vilified by the American media, the so-called watchdogs of the "land of the free."
More like land of the cowards, home of the slaves.
While Americans get fat and obsess about Paris Hilton's DUI, their government openly writes legislation authorizing the sexual molestation and torture of children.
Meanwhile, infuriated Chinese peasant farmers in the south revolt against the brutal PLA armed with nothing more than spades and garden forks.
Shame on America - we thought the entrenched legacy established by the founding fathers would never be displaced in the eyes of history but the past two generations of U.S. citizens are doing their level best to ensure the country will be defined by its populace of gutless sheep who have about as much backbone as a dead jellyfish.
But don't expect China to be kicked out of the UN - that oh so benevolent organization is too busy giving "cultural diversity" awards to brutal dictators who like to boil innocent people alive.
Chinese dissidents need to rise up, organize and form a united front against their mass murdering hereditary dictatorship government or sell their own children into slavery for generations to come. They need to enact a Thai-style coup and politically decapitate their oppressors even at the risk of a 21st century Tiananmen Square.
The tree of liberty needs to be occasionally watered by the blood of patriots. I challenge the Chinese people to throw off the illusory chains these human worms have shackled upon you and be remembered in eternity for standing up for what matters.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
2tuff's words
From http://www.davidickeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36537
Israeli's and Jews do not control planet Earth as the Vatican would like you to all believe. Israel is controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations the same as the United States. This is why we get the Illusion of Israel setting U.S policy! Who created the STATE of Israel? It was of course the United Nations in 1948! Who created the United Nations? It was the Council on Foreign Relations! Who created the CFR in 1921? The Sovereign Military of Malta! Who controls the SMOM? The Jesuit Order! The highest level of Jew groups is the B'Nai B'rith which at its hierachy is part of the few groups within the Order of Illuminati. Who controls the jewish A.D.L? Yes B'Nai B'rith! Now who created and controls B'Nai B'Rith? The Scottish Rite of Freemasonry! Now who created the Scottish Rite? The Jesuit Order and Fredrick the Great II. The Jesuits wrote all the degrees including the ones instituted by Fredrick! So alas can you see the true leadership now? Its not as hidden as you may first think.
-2tuff
_________________
-2tuff
_________________
Bush 'super-state' agenda to create American Union is now official
From http://infowars.net/articles/September2006/280906Union.htm
Bush 'super-state' agenda to create American Union is now official
Steve Watson, Paul Watson & Alex Jones September 28 2006
Journalist Jerome Corsi has received the first documents pertaining to a FOIA request asking for full disclosure of the SPP office in its activities towards creating a Pan American Union.
According to a report by World Net Daily, the documents reveal that the Bush administration is running a "shadow government" without congressional oversight in conjunction with Canada and Mexico under the guise of a program "to increase security and to enhance prosperity among the three countries through greater cooperation."
Corsi asserts that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under this program to "integrate" and "harmonize" with administrative law in Mexico and Canada.
The documents contain references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
Corsi has further reported that at a recent high-level confab in Banff, an assistant U.S. secretary of state, Thomas A. Shannon , chaired a panel that featured a presentation by Prof. Robert Pastor, author of a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.
The open plan to merge the US with Mexico and Canada and create a Pan American Union networked by a NAFTA Super Highway has long been a Globalist brainchild but its very real and prescient implementation on behalf of the Council on Foreign Relations has finally been reported on by mainstream news outlets.
After nearly ten years of reporting by Alex Jones and the rest of the Patriot Movement, the establishment press is finally covering serious reports on the plan for a Pan-American Union, based on recent articles by Human Events columnist Jerome Corsi.
Back in June World Net Daily reported ,
"The White House has established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005."
The article even carries the admission that the Council on Foreign Relations, often the bane of sophomoric stereotypical caricatures of paranoid conspiracy theorists, played a fundamental role in crafting the policy for the homogenization of the US, Canada and Mexico.
"Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form."
This admission is as historical as it is concerning - the CFR moulds the foundational policy for the elimination of American sovereignty and it is passed as executive law within weeks. It is once again evident that the true vestiges of power lie within the ranks of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission who act on policy decided upon by the big brother of multinational semi-secret steering societies, the Bilderberg Group.
Up until five or six years ago the CFR largely operated in the shadows, only publishing its mouthpiece Foreign Affairs, and any inference that the group held sway in US politics or even existed was met by heckles of incredulity from the establishment media. Now the Associated Press openly reports their guiding hand in the drives towards global government.
The framework on which the American Union is being pegged is the NAFTA Super Highway (pictured) , a four football-fields-wide leviathan that stretches from southern Mexico through the US up to Montreal Canada.
Corsi's work cites government websites which carry full planning details of the Super Highway and its construction has already begun in Texas with no congressional oversight whatsoever. The Trans-Texas Corridor is being overseen by The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the contract is owned by the Cintra corporation which in turn is owned by the King of Spain Juan Carlos. The project is being financed by the implementation of a toll that will be collected by means of GPS tracking devices installed in all vehicles and also envelops many connecting roads to the highway.
The NAFTA Super Highway will allow vehicles, people and goods to travel from Mexico, into the heart of America and up to Canada with little impediment, effectively erasing America's borders wholesale.
Coupled with Bush's blanket amnesty program, the Pan American Union is the final jigsaw piece for the total dismantling of America as we know it.
Related: Pan American Union Archive
Related: The American Union by 2005 – 2006 by Robert Gaylon Ross
Thursday, September 28, 2006
Wednesday, September 27, 2006
Design
Reasoned analysis to decipher the truth should be a goal yearned among all mankind. Lies and intimidation constantly run haywire on this planet still. As long as I live, I firmly expose the new world order. Plus, I will keep speaking on what's really going on in the globe. Unlike some people, I will present factual sources and other evidence to make pointsabout issues ranging from flouridation to the evils of abortion. Divisions among Americans are commonplace including political ideological tensions. You have folks like Life Dynamics rightfully exposing the abortion Holocaust of the unborn. Then, you have Bill Maher claiming that religion is symymous with experiencing a psychosis, which is obviously inaccurate. Lisa Goddard from the CNN on September 27, 2006 reported on how people were arrested for protesting the Iraq War. Two Presbyterian ministers were among the 71 police that were arrested. They had sit ins at the Capitol.
They endorse and of course many liberals are apart of it since the liberals are right to oppose the war (though I don't agree with the liberals at every issue). What's real in Iraq. It's obvious with death, depleted uranium, at least 14 permanent military bases, and the neo-conservative agenda are promoted. The National Intelligence Estimate was a declassified document sent to Bush and Cheney in 2006. It tells the public that the Iraq War increased the influence of Muslim radicals in the region. Also, CNN on September 27, 2006 have Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf telling CNN that Iraq is more dangerous now as a consequence of the war. John Leyden from The Register on September 27, 2006 discuss on how some in California seek to propose more RFID chip-safeguards for California. The bill is called Identity Information Protection Act of 2006 , which calls for California to disagree what information can be encypted into RFID chips in library cards, licenses, and the like. Critics of this believe it will cause frivilious lawsuits, but our culture is already too emerged in Big Brother systems (now there is RFID chips on U.S. passports). Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger could sign it into law.
Daily Kos on September 27, 2006 wrote that ESPN manufactured fake noises during the ceremony of Monday Night Football. They say that there were fake cheers for George H. W. Bush and fake booes for the Democrats. Daily Kos further comments that in reality, strong booes were present when Bush Sr. flipped the coin. Of course, people were angry of Barbara Bush's comments that the people staying in the Astrodome was a good thing or the terrible response of the federal (it deserve the most blame since the Hurricane affected multiple states with FEMA having food delivery and communication problems), state, and local governments. One of my main problems with people like Daily Kos, MoveOn.org (supported by the internationalist & globalist CFR-member George Soros who even endorsed partial birth abortion), Sean Hannity, etc. is that they obsess with this left/right paradigm. They claim that each side is truly against the establishment, yet both sides (in its leadership) are controlled by the same people (i.e. CFR, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, high level Freemasonry, Knights of Malta (whose head is Andrew Bertie. One famous Knight is King Juan Carlos of Spain influencing the Middle East), K of C, Jesuits, the Pilgrim Society, etc.) It doesn't matter if you talking about George W. Bush [a Bonesman whose uncle Prescott Bush Jr. is a Knight of Malta] or Bill Clinton [a man who graduated from the Jesuit Georgetown University. His mentor was Professor Carroll Quigley. Clinton is a friend of Bush Sr.], it's part of the same game unnecessarily dividing Americans.
In Hampton Roads, Virginia, Phillip Grover is a man mentioned in the Virginian Pilot newspaper. Grover is a religious Christian man who preaches, says that 911 was an inside job, believes that the U.N. is a globalist organization (which it is. The United Nations have promoted a "one world government" system for decades. The U.N.'s charter was created by socialists and some of its founders were in the CFR. This globalization is also endorsed by IMF, WTO, etc. Bible believing Christians definitely exposed all of these factions), and some other facts. My advise to him is to continue to use the scriptures. Also, Grover needs to make apparent extra rational evidence (like news reports, studies, stats, book, documents, etc.) to further prove his points. Grover was arrested by the police once. The police told him to cool it. Individuals have a right to subscribe to any belief system that he or she wants to. I hope Grover doesn't fall into the trap of making himself a carcicture of those who deal with real conspracies in the globe. The truth is that real conspiracies exist, the federal government has been (and is) involved in corruption, the offical story of 9/11 has been descredited, and Grover has a right to peacefully show his views. Freedom is still complete here in America. You have the Patriot Act ambigiously defining terrorism in Section 802. Vicki Allen from Reuters on September 26, 2006 wrote that enemy combatant could be extended into more people under the propose combatant bill. The Patriot Act has been used against innocent scientists and other people with no ties with "terrorism."
I would comment on the libertarian Jesse Ventura. Recently, Jesse questioned the offical story of 9/11. He is in a long list of Hollywood types and political figures that disagree with the government's version (there is Building Number Seven when no plain hit it, experts like Professor Steven Jones saying that explosives brought down the Towers, and recently former Sergeant in the United States Army named Lauro "LJ" Chavez speaking about stand down orders in 9/11 crippling NORAD's response to the 4 aircraft). He said that NORAD's failed response, Operation Northwoods (a government plan to create terrorism to justify an invasion of Cuba), and the Gulf on Tonkin incident (Robert S. McNamara admitted in the History Channel that some of it was fake as a justification to fight the Communist Vietnamese. The war was nicknamed "Spelly's war," because Cardinal Spellman love the war and called the troops "soldiers of Christ." It's a known fact that rabid Roman Catholic dictator Diem and other slaughtered millions of innocent Buddhists during that war. Jesuit Dan Lyons worked with war Generals CFR- member Westermoland and Abrams in conducting that war.
That's in history. As a result of that war sending illegal drugs into America, ca. 56,000 American G.I.s. died including probably as high as 2 million Vietnamese died as well) makes certain that the government can do terrorism. He is right to make mention that no one should trust the government 100%. If you give up liberty for security, you get tyranny and Benjamin Franklin made that point know. Jesse was in Texas to support the campaign of Texas candidate Kinky Friedman. Design is all encompassing. There are millions of blood vessels that give blood throughout the human body. Tons of specific cell reactions must occur to just make a cell function approriately. Humans are master builders of cathedrals and palaces filled with geometric patterns plus architectural components. With design manifest, it is conceivable to embrace the ideal of God originatally creating the Earth and the Universe. Health problems are still a threat. In fact, almost a third of all UK food and drink products contain pesticides (according to the Pesticide Residue Committee's 2005 annual report). Pesticides are sprayed unto food all of the time.
I'm still here. It's almost October 2006. The video above is from Jordan Maxwell. I don't agree with all of his theology, but he is right about the machinations of Secret societies and how much of the populace doesn't understand this. Jordan Maxwell discussed about Vatican connection to world geo-political events from WWII and the Ratlines to Watergate. I've even learned more about the JFK assassination and cover up with names like 33rd Degree Freemason J. Edgar Hoover, Allen Dulles, Louis M. Bloomfield, Knight of Malta William F. Buckley, Henry Luce, etc. Sometimes, we can learn something from the dead. With all of the mistakes of John Fritzgerald Kennedy, he was right and courageous to condemn all secret societies, secret oaths, and secret proceedings. Malcolm X (1925-1965) was right to expose the Elite's manipulation of the poor (especially those of color still going on today). Malcolm X also said that the NOI and the KKK had the same paymasters. Later in 1965, he was assassinated by the NOI, FBI, and NYPD according to Malcolm's wife, Eric Jon Phelps, Professor Marable, and others. Malcolm X also was one of the first men in America to publiclly be against the Vietnam War as early as 1964. Legitimate Design is one of the beauties of God. People should be active and help their neigbhors.
By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
Jesse Ventura Highlights Government Plan To Attack U.S. Cities & Kill Americans
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/270906jesseventura.htm
Jesse Ventura Highlights Government Plan To Attack U.S. Cities & Kill Americans
Video Interview: Cites Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, JFK assassination, NORAD stand down as reasons to question official 9/11 story
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com September 27 2006
In a sit-down video interview recorded on Monday night, former Minnesota Governor, pro-wrestling star and actor Jesse Ventura told radio host Alex Jones he found it very disturbing in light of what happened on 9/11 that the U.S. government had once planned to "attack certain cities within the United States," as a pretext for war.
Ventura was in Texas doing media events in support of independent Texas gubernatorial candidate Kinky Friedman. In this explosive interview Ventura sounds off on a number of controversial subjects and the direction in which America is heading.
Watch the full video interview with Ventura below for free.
Part 1
Part 2
"In the early sixties the Pentagon had an operation called Operation Northwoods and it never came to reality but it was on the table that our military would attack certain cities within the United States and make it look like Cuba did it to justify an invasion of Cuba," said Ventura.
"It never happened but just the simple fact that they contemplated it and it was actually on the table in the Pentagon I find that just very disturbing - that they would even consider using our military to try to justify an invasion of another country."
Ventura, a former Navy Seal, then cited the Gulf of Tonkin cover-up as an example of how false provocations are staged by governments to lead nations into war.
"It was very disappointing to believe in your country that they would lie to you to get into a war - that they would perpetrate a lie and that the media would go along with it - it's a real eye opener and you realize that if they would do it in the sixties they'll do it again - and if it works once it will work again - government very much operates that way," said Ventura.
Ventura said that shortly after he found out the truth behind the Gulf of Tonkin, Robert McNamara paid a visit to Harvard where Ventura was teaching and he had to be "locked up in a room" so that he wouldn't confront McNamara.
Ventura questioned the interception and tracking of Payne Stewart's Lear Jet in October 1999 and compared the incident to the total lack of air defense response on 9/11.
"Where were our planes - when all of this was going on....to my knowledge at no time did we have any fighter planes up in the air - why?"
-------------"The DVD of the resistance!" Get TerrorStorm on DVD today! Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and see it in high quality or watch it for free at Google Video.--------
Citing cover-ups that led to the Vietnam war and the JFK assassination, Ventura stated that it was not "beyond reason to not at least consider that the government certainly would do things like that."
Ventura said that it was via his 25-year research of the Kennedy assassination that he came to learn about the Gulf of Tonkin and Operation Northwoods.
"I don't believe for one minute the Warren Commission," said Ventura, asking that if the assassination represented the actions of Lee Harvey Oswald alone why would the information pertaining to it have to be kept secret under national security for 20 years.
"I've been to Dealy Plaza and I don't think he could make the shot," said Ventura, "it was a difficult shot with a target going away from you and dropping and not only that - he had to shoot through a tree."
Ventura said the fact that Oswald was never proven guilty in court of law itself proves he was simply convicted by public and government opinion.
"There's no definitive evidence that he did it in my opinion," concluded Ventura.
Ventura was asked if an exchange of liberty for security was a reasonable price to pay and responded by highlighting the Bush administration's mishandling of the Hurricane Katrina crisis in New Orleans.
"The country can't protect you - you have to protect yourself," said Ventura.
"They had two weeks to prepare for that and couldn't save anybody - how are they going to save you from a terrorist attack," said Ventura, "I don't buy that we're any more safe than we were prior to 9/11."
"It was very interesting that Richard Nixon had the 82nd Airborne in there when the hurricane hit back in the seventies within 24 hours and yet this President didn't do a thing for eight days."
"For people who say well you can't blame President Bush - yes I fully blame him for the hurricane," said Ventura.
"Every time the government tells you they're going to protect you be prepared because you're going to lose your rights," said Ventura, saying that he would prefer dealing with terrorism rather than accepting an erosion of personal liberty.
"These were also the same people that told us there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - so take it with a grain of salt - they were wrong once they could be wrong again."
Ventura said the Democrats and Republicans were destroying the election process and allowing the elections "fall victim to a system of bribery," but blamed the American people for sharing an apathy that means they don't get involved and don't care beyond their own lives. He was also cynical that another investigation of 9/11 would achieve anything.
"Has there ever been a real investigation?," asked Ventura.
Qualifying himself in saying everything was not a conspiracy, Ventura later dismissed the possibility that Senator Paul Wellstone was killed as a result of his plane being sabotaged as "bullsh***t."
However, Ventura was adamant that Americans should never trust their government because "the government is people" and comprises a cross section of society.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Jesse Ventura Highlights Government Plan To Attack U.S. Cities & Kill Americans
Video Interview: Cites Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, JFK assassination, NORAD stand down as reasons to question official 9/11 story
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com September 27 2006
In a sit-down video interview recorded on Monday night, former Minnesota Governor, pro-wrestling star and actor Jesse Ventura told radio host Alex Jones he found it very disturbing in light of what happened on 9/11 that the U.S. government had once planned to "attack certain cities within the United States," as a pretext for war.
Ventura was in Texas doing media events in support of independent Texas gubernatorial candidate Kinky Friedman. In this explosive interview Ventura sounds off on a number of controversial subjects and the direction in which America is heading.
Watch the full video interview with Ventura below for free.
Part 1
Part 2
"In the early sixties the Pentagon had an operation called Operation Northwoods and it never came to reality but it was on the table that our military would attack certain cities within the United States and make it look like Cuba did it to justify an invasion of Cuba," said Ventura.
"It never happened but just the simple fact that they contemplated it and it was actually on the table in the Pentagon I find that just very disturbing - that they would even consider using our military to try to justify an invasion of another country."
Ventura, a former Navy Seal, then cited the Gulf of Tonkin cover-up as an example of how false provocations are staged by governments to lead nations into war.
"It was very disappointing to believe in your country that they would lie to you to get into a war - that they would perpetrate a lie and that the media would go along with it - it's a real eye opener and you realize that if they would do it in the sixties they'll do it again - and if it works once it will work again - government very much operates that way," said Ventura.
Ventura said that shortly after he found out the truth behind the Gulf of Tonkin, Robert McNamara paid a visit to Harvard where Ventura was teaching and he had to be "locked up in a room" so that he wouldn't confront McNamara.
Ventura questioned the interception and tracking of Payne Stewart's Lear Jet in October 1999 and compared the incident to the total lack of air defense response on 9/11.
"Where were our planes - when all of this was going on....to my knowledge at no time did we have any fighter planes up in the air - why?"
-------------"The DVD of the resistance!" Get TerrorStorm on DVD today! Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and see it in high quality or watch it for free at Google Video.--------
Citing cover-ups that led to the Vietnam war and the JFK assassination, Ventura stated that it was not "beyond reason to not at least consider that the government certainly would do things like that."
Ventura said that it was via his 25-year research of the Kennedy assassination that he came to learn about the Gulf of Tonkin and Operation Northwoods.
"I don't believe for one minute the Warren Commission," said Ventura, asking that if the assassination represented the actions of Lee Harvey Oswald alone why would the information pertaining to it have to be kept secret under national security for 20 years.
"I've been to Dealy Plaza and I don't think he could make the shot," said Ventura, "it was a difficult shot with a target going away from you and dropping and not only that - he had to shoot through a tree."
Ventura said the fact that Oswald was never proven guilty in court of law itself proves he was simply convicted by public and government opinion.
"There's no definitive evidence that he did it in my opinion," concluded Ventura.
Ventura was asked if an exchange of liberty for security was a reasonable price to pay and responded by highlighting the Bush administration's mishandling of the Hurricane Katrina crisis in New Orleans.
"The country can't protect you - you have to protect yourself," said Ventura.
"They had two weeks to prepare for that and couldn't save anybody - how are they going to save you from a terrorist attack," said Ventura, "I don't buy that we're any more safe than we were prior to 9/11."
"It was very interesting that Richard Nixon had the 82nd Airborne in there when the hurricane hit back in the seventies within 24 hours and yet this President didn't do a thing for eight days."
"For people who say well you can't blame President Bush - yes I fully blame him for the hurricane," said Ventura.
"Every time the government tells you they're going to protect you be prepared because you're going to lose your rights," said Ventura, saying that he would prefer dealing with terrorism rather than accepting an erosion of personal liberty.
"These were also the same people that told us there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - so take it with a grain of salt - they were wrong once they could be wrong again."
Ventura said the Democrats and Republicans were destroying the election process and allowing the elections "fall victim to a system of bribery," but blamed the American people for sharing an apathy that means they don't get involved and don't care beyond their own lives. He was also cynical that another investigation of 9/11 would achieve anything.
"Has there ever been a real investigation?," asked Ventura.
Qualifying himself in saying everything was not a conspiracy, Ventura later dismissed the possibility that Senator Paul Wellstone was killed as a result of his plane being sabotaged as "bullsh***t."
However, Ventura was adamant that Americans should never trust their government because "the government is people" and comprises a cross section of society.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Hugo Chavez Knows the Handshake by Victor Thorn
From http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/chavez.html
Hugo Chavez Knows the Handshake by Victor Thorn
If Hugo Chavez truly wanted to destroy the Bush administration and bring America to its knees, he had a perfect opportunity to do so when addressing the United Nations on September 20, 2006. I mean, let’s face it: Chavez is well aware of many inconsistencies with the “official” 9-11 story. In fact, here is what he said on Tuesday, September 13th - over a week before his U.N. appearance:“It’s plausible the U.S. government was involved in the September 11 attacks.” He also added: “The hypothesis is not absurd … that those buildings could not have been dynamited. A building never collapses like that unless it’s with an implosion.” He concluded, “The hypothesis that is gaining strength … is that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack or act against its own people and against citizens of all over the world. Why? To justify the aggressions that immediately were unleashed on Afghanistan, on Iraq.”
Regrettably, Chavez’ statements only appeared in the Miami Herald, and didn’t get nationwide coverage (obviously due to the mainstream media stranglehold in this country). On top of that, 9-11 hero and activist William Rodriguez met with Venezuelan President of the Assembly Nicolas Maduro in March 2006, as well as Chavez himself. Again, this information was ignored by the American press, as well as their counterparts in most other parts of the world.But here at last was his big chance: to completely and utterly blow the neo-cons and George W. Bush out of the water before the entire world (and after Ahmadinejad’s speech, we know everyone was watching). After all, there’s no bigger venue on the entire planet than the United Nations – and considering how many countries despise the U.S., there’s little possibility that everyone would be able to black it out.Plus, it has been reported that Nicolas Maduro’s house is “brimming with books, videos and documents about the 9/11 cover-up,” and that Venezuela planned to launch a 9-11 investigation.So here it was: the day of reckoning when Chavez could really stick it to Bush & his Israel-first partners in crime and embarrass the hell out of them before the entire world.
What could be better, especially for someone who supposedly DESPISES this man? Furthermore, if Chavez laid out tons of irrefutable evidence that contradicted the official 9-11 story, think about the ramifications that would ensue. The cat would finally be out of the bag for everyone to see, and the conspiracy would be broken.What more could Chavez ask for? Here was his time … his moment in the sun to finally stick it to his arch nemesis. Every news station from Kyrgyzstan to Katmandu would cover it, and at long last the real bastards behind 9-11 wouldn’t have anywhere to run. The hammer would finally drop.But what did Hugo the socialist do? He did schtick up there on stage at the U.N. calling Bush “el diablo” and saying that the room still smelled like sulfur. Sure, it was funny, and a minor poke in Bush’s eye; but in the end what did it accomplish? Absolutely nothing of significance. The U.S. administration brushed it off as the ramblings of a Lenny Bruce madman, and business continued as usual.
Note:
When appearing on George Noory's Coast-to-Coast AM radio show earlier this month, Lisa Guliani and I wasted no time whatsoever in exposing Israel's central role in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, even though the host had no intention to broach this subject. Remember this point, because if somebody really wants to do something, they do it!Anyway, don’t you see? These guys all know the handshake. They’re all in the same club, and even though they have different superficial agendas, none are going to upset the apple cart or destroy the status quo. Why should they? They’re all multi-millionaires (or billionaires) whose financial prosperity is all tied into each others. It’s just like Bush & Kerry in 2004. Both are Skull & Bonesmen, and both pay allegiance to the same masters (i.e. the election was rigged from the start). The same applies to these bozos at the U.N. They’re all reading from the same professional wrestling script.If Chavez had truly wanted to destroy Bush and his current cabinet, he could have laid a plethora of undeniable 9-11 data on the table at the U.N. and blown the whole thing sky high.But he didn’t, and that should tell you something.
Hugo Chavez Knows the Handshake by Victor Thorn
If Hugo Chavez truly wanted to destroy the Bush administration and bring America to its knees, he had a perfect opportunity to do so when addressing the United Nations on September 20, 2006. I mean, let’s face it: Chavez is well aware of many inconsistencies with the “official” 9-11 story. In fact, here is what he said on Tuesday, September 13th - over a week before his U.N. appearance:“It’s plausible the U.S. government was involved in the September 11 attacks.” He also added: “The hypothesis is not absurd … that those buildings could not have been dynamited. A building never collapses like that unless it’s with an implosion.” He concluded, “The hypothesis that is gaining strength … is that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack or act against its own people and against citizens of all over the world. Why? To justify the aggressions that immediately were unleashed on Afghanistan, on Iraq.”
Regrettably, Chavez’ statements only appeared in the Miami Herald, and didn’t get nationwide coverage (obviously due to the mainstream media stranglehold in this country). On top of that, 9-11 hero and activist William Rodriguez met with Venezuelan President of the Assembly Nicolas Maduro in March 2006, as well as Chavez himself. Again, this information was ignored by the American press, as well as their counterparts in most other parts of the world.But here at last was his big chance: to completely and utterly blow the neo-cons and George W. Bush out of the water before the entire world (and after Ahmadinejad’s speech, we know everyone was watching). After all, there’s no bigger venue on the entire planet than the United Nations – and considering how many countries despise the U.S., there’s little possibility that everyone would be able to black it out.Plus, it has been reported that Nicolas Maduro’s house is “brimming with books, videos and documents about the 9/11 cover-up,” and that Venezuela planned to launch a 9-11 investigation.So here it was: the day of reckoning when Chavez could really stick it to Bush & his Israel-first partners in crime and embarrass the hell out of them before the entire world.
What could be better, especially for someone who supposedly DESPISES this man? Furthermore, if Chavez laid out tons of irrefutable evidence that contradicted the official 9-11 story, think about the ramifications that would ensue. The cat would finally be out of the bag for everyone to see, and the conspiracy would be broken.What more could Chavez ask for? Here was his time … his moment in the sun to finally stick it to his arch nemesis. Every news station from Kyrgyzstan to Katmandu would cover it, and at long last the real bastards behind 9-11 wouldn’t have anywhere to run. The hammer would finally drop.But what did Hugo the socialist do? He did schtick up there on stage at the U.N. calling Bush “el diablo” and saying that the room still smelled like sulfur. Sure, it was funny, and a minor poke in Bush’s eye; but in the end what did it accomplish? Absolutely nothing of significance. The U.S. administration brushed it off as the ramblings of a Lenny Bruce madman, and business continued as usual.
Note:
When appearing on George Noory's Coast-to-Coast AM radio show earlier this month, Lisa Guliani and I wasted no time whatsoever in exposing Israel's central role in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, even though the host had no intention to broach this subject. Remember this point, because if somebody really wants to do something, they do it!Anyway, don’t you see? These guys all know the handshake. They’re all in the same club, and even though they have different superficial agendas, none are going to upset the apple cart or destroy the status quo. Why should they? They’re all multi-millionaires (or billionaires) whose financial prosperity is all tied into each others. It’s just like Bush & Kerry in 2004. Both are Skull & Bonesmen, and both pay allegiance to the same masters (i.e. the election was rigged from the start). The same applies to these bozos at the U.N. They’re all reading from the same professional wrestling script.If Chavez had truly wanted to destroy Bush and his current cabinet, he could have laid a plethora of undeniable 9-11 data on the table at the U.N. and blown the whole thing sky high.But he didn’t, and that should tell you something.
Eric Jon Phelps' words
From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=1490
Dear Friends,
There is no doubt that the Jesuit Order, in control of the CIA/KGB/SIS-MI5-MI6/FBI/Mossad/BND/the Chinese SIS/ISI via the Knights of Malta, is going to detonate nukes in the US. This will put the nation on a total war footing, suspending the Constitution as per executive order or a fascist Opus Dei-controlled Supreme Court ruling. I believe this will happen after the British have been terrorized out of "the War on Terror," thus facilitating the Kingdom's adoption of the European Constitution and the Euro.
Then it wll be the exclusive war of the American Empire, to be waged on two fronts.Further, the nukes have been planted here in the US for over twenty years. According to the defector Alexander Lebed, a former head of Russian missle forces, over 100 nukes were planted by the KGB (assisted by the CIA) before the end of the Cold War. With five to ten detonations near Jewish or Protestant/Baptist populations (most likely in the South and the West thus not disrupting our main commercial and Roman Catholic cities), the Moslems can be blamed justifying the nuking of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia---secretly to be carried out by the Masonic Bush's Masonic Wahhabi Bin Laden Construction Co.The event in London today is but the Order's plan to discourage the British people from continuing to side with the US in the Pope's Crusade against Islam. Notice one of the targets--"Shepherd's Bush" which is in fact the signature of Bush's Shepherd (Benedict XVI). When Knight of Malta Blair finally pulls out, then the nuclear events can be unleashed on the US.If I were the Black Pope, this is how I would do it.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Al-Qaida's U.S. nuclear targetshttp://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45313
________________
From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=1491
Roman Catholic Bavarian Nazi Pope Benedict XVI (ordained as a priest in 1951 by the Archbishop of Munich and power behind the Nazi party, Michael Cardinal von Faulhaber), is the master of the Rothshilds, not vice versa. As shown in VA, the Rothschilds financed the Jesuit Order's French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars. Further, the Rothschilds financed the Order's Second Thirty Years' War (1914-1945) as well as the creation of Pope Pius XII's Masonic Jewish Zionists in creating the anti-Torah CFR-controlled, fascist government of Israel. The Papacy maintains these criminals in power via the Order's Federal Reserve Bank extending billions in credit to the US Fourteenth Amendment Parliament, which "Congress" then lends the "money" to the government of Israel further intrenching these criminals in power. All of this murder and theft is then blamed on the misinformed American people.As most Europeans know, the Masonic Rothschilds are merely Vatican bankers at the beck and call of the Papacy controlled by the Black Pope.No, a book should be written titled, "Ratzinger's Rothschilds."
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
_____________________
Makes Sense! Michael Savage is another one of the Pope's "Court Jews" promoting this war against Isam from the demolition of the WTC on 911. The destruction of Mecca and Medina is a surety unless this Crusade is exposed for what it is---a calculated war between two empires whose Masonic leaders are in complete subjection to the Black Pope.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:52 AM
Subject: MORE ON MECCA and MEDINA Brother Eric,
I was listening to the last 10 minutes of the Michael Savage show last night and guess what he was talking about.?.?.? Bombing Mecca and Medina. They are tilting their hand, but most will merely just give it the "brush off". With love in Christ, Rob
___________________
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=1482
_____________________
From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=3733
Dear Bxxxx,
I have a few other facts that may be of interest.First, in a private meeting between Kaiser Wilhelm II and Pope Leo XIII (the pope that was poisioned by the Jesuits who was then given an antidote once conforming with the wishes of the Black Pope), Leo stated that Wilhelm was to be "the Sword of the Church." This the Lutheran Kaiser refused to do as recorded in his The Kaiser's Memoirs. Shortly thereafter, the Grand Orient Lodge in Germany determined to overthrow the Hohenzollern Dynasty (as was later revealed to Wilhelm by a German Freemason and also recorded in his Memoirs, which overthrow was accomplished following WWI---the first round of the Jesuits' Second Thirty Years' War against Germany (1914-1918; 1933-1945). Additionally, Bismarck and the Reichstag had emancipated 550,000 German Jews in 1871 and the following year expelled the Society of Jesus---further enraging the Order.
The Dynasty was formally on the hit list, not only for these reasons but due to the defeat of the Order's Roman Catholic Austria in 1866 and Jesuit-ruled Roman Catholic France in 1871 at Sedan. Napoleon III fled France and spent the rest of his days under the protection of the Order's most obedient British Monrach, Queen Victoria. Failing to subjugate "heretic" Protestant Prussia, the Sons of Loyola would attempt it again via France in secret league with Tzarist Russia. Meanwhile, the Jesuit-ruled King Edward VII was busy creating the Triple Entente preparing for the Company's attempted war of annhilation against Protestant Prussia---WWI.Further, the Kaiser sought to undue the secret alliance between France and Russia finalized in 1892.
In this he succeeded at a private meeting with Nicholas II on the Tzar's yacht in Finnish waters in 1905, following the Order's destruction of the Russian navy by its "Japanese Sword of the Church." (Yes, the Black Pope has been in total control of Japan since no later than 1868.) There, with tears in his eyes, Nicholas vowed never to go to war with Wilhelm. This act, if enfoced by Nicholas, would have prevented the beginning of WWI caused by the mobilization 800,000 Russian troops on the Prussian border. This great treaty was rendered useless by Russian Minister Isvolski according to U.S. Senator Robert Owen in his masterpiece, The Russian-Imperial Conspircay, 1892-1914.Further, Kaiser Wilhelm opposed the Boer War, that Jesuit-inspired Crusade against the Protestant Reformed, White South African Boers. English Masons Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Milmer and yes, the Prince of Wales---later King Edward VII---conducted this papal crusade and killed tens of thousands of Boers (elderly men, women and children) in concentration camps, delighting the Order's Jesuit-styled "Roundtable" in London. Of course all the gold in the Transvaal became Britain's---and thus was now to be used to finance the Order's agenda for the new Twentieth century---"the century of revenge."
So, the Kaiser was on the Black Pope's hit list: Wilhelm was not a Freemason and was also a hostile enemy of the Pope and his Jesuits. Not good for business or one's personal health.This brings us to the control of Jerusalem by a nominal Protestant monarch who opposed the Jesuits; who opposed his pro-Jesuit, Masonic uncle Edward VII whom he called "Satan;" who opposed the wicked Jesuit policies of Britain; and who opposed Rome's Masonic Zionist control of Jerusalem. The Lutheran Kaiser knew Britain's Rothschild Zionists---Herzl in particular---were controlled by Rome. Did not Theodore Herzl have a notorious audience with the Pope in 1904? Was not this Zionist traitor to his own people the pawn of the Pope's Rothschilds, streaking to international prominance via the Black Pope's Dreyfus Affair and controlled international press? Thus, to support Britain's Masonic Zionists meant to give control of Jerusalem to the Papacy.
This Wilhelm he sought to prevent. He wanted Jerusalem for his Protestant Prussian Empire, and Jerusalem under the Kaiser may well have fared better than Jerusalem under the British, the Order having been formally readmitted into Britain by King Edward VII in 1902. And since Jerusalem must be under Gentile rule until "the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled" (Luke 21:24), would not the anti-Jesuit Protestant German Empire have been a better Gentile master to the Jews than the pro-Jesuit Protestant British Empire?Therefore, I do not believe that the Kaiser was in Jerusalem in 1898 on behalf of Pope Leo XIII. He was there to thwart the British which included the Masonic Jewish Zionists; he was an enemy of the policies of the Black Pope's international, Masonic "Invisible Empire." The First Reich under Charlamagne was pre-Reformation and thus Roman Catholic---when Jews were severely persecuted (i.e., blamed and mass-murdered for the Black Death). The First Reich was ended in 1806 by the Order's "great avenger" against the anti-Jesuit Papacy and its Holy Roman Empire---Napoleon I. The Second Reich was Protestant and built upon the foundation of military victories against the Jesuit-ruled Hapsburgs (1866) and the Jesuit-ruled Bonapartes (1871), as well as the "accursed" Jewish emancipation (1871) and subsequent suppression of the Jesuits (1872).
The Third Reich was completely in the hands of Roman Catholics (Hitler, Himmler, Mueller, Thyssen, etc.) and thus it carried out the policies of that creature of the Jesuit General, Pope Pius XII. The result was the Pope's "Final ]Roman Catholic] Solution to the [Jesuit-agitated] Jewish Question" as championed by the Order's secret emissary and inspiration of both Hitler and Himmler, the Lutheran, Masonic founder of the Order of the New Templars, the openly anti-Jesuit ex-priest, George Lanz. The notorious La Civilta Cattolica---the house organ for the Jesuits in Rome---ceaselessly agitated for the solution to the "Jewish Question" for sixty years (1880-1940).In conclusion concerning the Kaiser, I believe his good name has been maligned by the Pope's global Press and corrupt historians---Emil Cohen (alias "Ludwig"). Wilhelm was terribly betrayed by General Ludendorff---the first Hitler. Wilhelm has been blamed for igniting WWI which is a bold-faced lie of the Black Pope's Masonically-ruled Press, and now he is blamed for having opposed the Order's Masonic Zionist movement, which very same movement, aided Hitler in the Pope's Holocaust. Like President Nixon, the Kaiser was not killed outright but was humiliated with the loss of his throne, empire, nation and good name now in infamy---a name so accursed by those Blackrobes, the Luciferian Sons of Loyola.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
Dear Friends,
There is no doubt that the Jesuit Order, in control of the CIA/KGB/SIS-MI5-MI6/FBI/Mossad/BND/the Chinese SIS/ISI via the Knights of Malta, is going to detonate nukes in the US. This will put the nation on a total war footing, suspending the Constitution as per executive order or a fascist Opus Dei-controlled Supreme Court ruling. I believe this will happen after the British have been terrorized out of "the War on Terror," thus facilitating the Kingdom's adoption of the European Constitution and the Euro.
Then it wll be the exclusive war of the American Empire, to be waged on two fronts.Further, the nukes have been planted here in the US for over twenty years. According to the defector Alexander Lebed, a former head of Russian missle forces, over 100 nukes were planted by the KGB (assisted by the CIA) before the end of the Cold War. With five to ten detonations near Jewish or Protestant/Baptist populations (most likely in the South and the West thus not disrupting our main commercial and Roman Catholic cities), the Moslems can be blamed justifying the nuking of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia---secretly to be carried out by the Masonic Bush's Masonic Wahhabi Bin Laden Construction Co.The event in London today is but the Order's plan to discourage the British people from continuing to side with the US in the Pope's Crusade against Islam. Notice one of the targets--"Shepherd's Bush" which is in fact the signature of Bush's Shepherd (Benedict XVI). When Knight of Malta Blair finally pulls out, then the nuclear events can be unleashed on the US.If I were the Black Pope, this is how I would do it.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Al-Qaida's U.S. nuclear targetshttp://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45313
________________
From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=1491
Roman Catholic Bavarian Nazi Pope Benedict XVI (ordained as a priest in 1951 by the Archbishop of Munich and power behind the Nazi party, Michael Cardinal von Faulhaber), is the master of the Rothshilds, not vice versa. As shown in VA, the Rothschilds financed the Jesuit Order's French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars. Further, the Rothschilds financed the Order's Second Thirty Years' War (1914-1945) as well as the creation of Pope Pius XII's Masonic Jewish Zionists in creating the anti-Torah CFR-controlled, fascist government of Israel. The Papacy maintains these criminals in power via the Order's Federal Reserve Bank extending billions in credit to the US Fourteenth Amendment Parliament, which "Congress" then lends the "money" to the government of Israel further intrenching these criminals in power. All of this murder and theft is then blamed on the misinformed American people.As most Europeans know, the Masonic Rothschilds are merely Vatican bankers at the beck and call of the Papacy controlled by the Black Pope.No, a book should be written titled, "Ratzinger's Rothschilds."
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
_____________________
Makes Sense! Michael Savage is another one of the Pope's "Court Jews" promoting this war against Isam from the demolition of the WTC on 911. The destruction of Mecca and Medina is a surety unless this Crusade is exposed for what it is---a calculated war between two empires whose Masonic leaders are in complete subjection to the Black Pope.
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:52 AM
Subject: MORE ON MECCA and MEDINA Brother Eric,
I was listening to the last 10 minutes of the Michael Savage show last night and guess what he was talking about.?.?.? Bombing Mecca and Medina. They are tilting their hand, but most will merely just give it the "brush off". With love in Christ, Rob
___________________
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=1482
_____________________
From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=3733
Dear Bxxxx,
I have a few other facts that may be of interest.First, in a private meeting between Kaiser Wilhelm II and Pope Leo XIII (the pope that was poisioned by the Jesuits who was then given an antidote once conforming with the wishes of the Black Pope), Leo stated that Wilhelm was to be "the Sword of the Church." This the Lutheran Kaiser refused to do as recorded in his The Kaiser's Memoirs. Shortly thereafter, the Grand Orient Lodge in Germany determined to overthrow the Hohenzollern Dynasty (as was later revealed to Wilhelm by a German Freemason and also recorded in his Memoirs, which overthrow was accomplished following WWI---the first round of the Jesuits' Second Thirty Years' War against Germany (1914-1918; 1933-1945). Additionally, Bismarck and the Reichstag had emancipated 550,000 German Jews in 1871 and the following year expelled the Society of Jesus---further enraging the Order.
The Dynasty was formally on the hit list, not only for these reasons but due to the defeat of the Order's Roman Catholic Austria in 1866 and Jesuit-ruled Roman Catholic France in 1871 at Sedan. Napoleon III fled France and spent the rest of his days under the protection of the Order's most obedient British Monrach, Queen Victoria. Failing to subjugate "heretic" Protestant Prussia, the Sons of Loyola would attempt it again via France in secret league with Tzarist Russia. Meanwhile, the Jesuit-ruled King Edward VII was busy creating the Triple Entente preparing for the Company's attempted war of annhilation against Protestant Prussia---WWI.Further, the Kaiser sought to undue the secret alliance between France and Russia finalized in 1892.
In this he succeeded at a private meeting with Nicholas II on the Tzar's yacht in Finnish waters in 1905, following the Order's destruction of the Russian navy by its "Japanese Sword of the Church." (Yes, the Black Pope has been in total control of Japan since no later than 1868.) There, with tears in his eyes, Nicholas vowed never to go to war with Wilhelm. This act, if enfoced by Nicholas, would have prevented the beginning of WWI caused by the mobilization 800,000 Russian troops on the Prussian border. This great treaty was rendered useless by Russian Minister Isvolski according to U.S. Senator Robert Owen in his masterpiece, The Russian-Imperial Conspircay, 1892-1914.Further, Kaiser Wilhelm opposed the Boer War, that Jesuit-inspired Crusade against the Protestant Reformed, White South African Boers. English Masons Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Milmer and yes, the Prince of Wales---later King Edward VII---conducted this papal crusade and killed tens of thousands of Boers (elderly men, women and children) in concentration camps, delighting the Order's Jesuit-styled "Roundtable" in London. Of course all the gold in the Transvaal became Britain's---and thus was now to be used to finance the Order's agenda for the new Twentieth century---"the century of revenge."
So, the Kaiser was on the Black Pope's hit list: Wilhelm was not a Freemason and was also a hostile enemy of the Pope and his Jesuits. Not good for business or one's personal health.This brings us to the control of Jerusalem by a nominal Protestant monarch who opposed the Jesuits; who opposed his pro-Jesuit, Masonic uncle Edward VII whom he called "Satan;" who opposed the wicked Jesuit policies of Britain; and who opposed Rome's Masonic Zionist control of Jerusalem. The Lutheran Kaiser knew Britain's Rothschild Zionists---Herzl in particular---were controlled by Rome. Did not Theodore Herzl have a notorious audience with the Pope in 1904? Was not this Zionist traitor to his own people the pawn of the Pope's Rothschilds, streaking to international prominance via the Black Pope's Dreyfus Affair and controlled international press? Thus, to support Britain's Masonic Zionists meant to give control of Jerusalem to the Papacy.
This Wilhelm he sought to prevent. He wanted Jerusalem for his Protestant Prussian Empire, and Jerusalem under the Kaiser may well have fared better than Jerusalem under the British, the Order having been formally readmitted into Britain by King Edward VII in 1902. And since Jerusalem must be under Gentile rule until "the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled" (Luke 21:24), would not the anti-Jesuit Protestant German Empire have been a better Gentile master to the Jews than the pro-Jesuit Protestant British Empire?Therefore, I do not believe that the Kaiser was in Jerusalem in 1898 on behalf of Pope Leo XIII. He was there to thwart the British which included the Masonic Jewish Zionists; he was an enemy of the policies of the Black Pope's international, Masonic "Invisible Empire." The First Reich under Charlamagne was pre-Reformation and thus Roman Catholic---when Jews were severely persecuted (i.e., blamed and mass-murdered for the Black Death). The First Reich was ended in 1806 by the Order's "great avenger" against the anti-Jesuit Papacy and its Holy Roman Empire---Napoleon I. The Second Reich was Protestant and built upon the foundation of military victories against the Jesuit-ruled Hapsburgs (1866) and the Jesuit-ruled Bonapartes (1871), as well as the "accursed" Jewish emancipation (1871) and subsequent suppression of the Jesuits (1872).
The Third Reich was completely in the hands of Roman Catholics (Hitler, Himmler, Mueller, Thyssen, etc.) and thus it carried out the policies of that creature of the Jesuit General, Pope Pius XII. The result was the Pope's "Final ]Roman Catholic] Solution to the [Jesuit-agitated] Jewish Question" as championed by the Order's secret emissary and inspiration of both Hitler and Himmler, the Lutheran, Masonic founder of the Order of the New Templars, the openly anti-Jesuit ex-priest, George Lanz. The notorious La Civilta Cattolica---the house organ for the Jesuits in Rome---ceaselessly agitated for the solution to the "Jewish Question" for sixty years (1880-1940).In conclusion concerning the Kaiser, I believe his good name has been maligned by the Pope's global Press and corrupt historians---Emil Cohen (alias "Ludwig"). Wilhelm was terribly betrayed by General Ludendorff---the first Hitler. Wilhelm has been blamed for igniting WWI which is a bold-faced lie of the Black Pope's Masonically-ruled Press, and now he is blamed for having opposed the Order's Masonic Zionist movement, which very same movement, aided Hitler in the Pope's Holocaust. Like President Nixon, the Kaiser was not killed outright but was humiliated with the loss of his throne, empire, nation and good name now in infamy---a name so accursed by those Blackrobes, the Luciferian Sons of Loyola.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
Former Governor Jesse Ventura Questions Official 9/11 Story
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/260906venturaquestions.htm
Former Governor Jesse Ventura Questions Official 9/11 Story
Goes further than ever before, cites Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, NORAD stand down, staged war provocations
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com September 26 2006
Former Minnesota Governor, actor and wrestling star Jesse Ventura has publicly questioned the official version of events behind 9/11 and gone further than ever before in citing Operation Northwoods and the Gulf of Tonkin as examples of how the government has planned and carried out staged war provocations in the past.
Ventura has temporarily left his Baja Mexico surfing lifestyle to lend support to Texas gubernatorial candidate Kinky Friedman. At a press conference yesterday Ventura said that the Republicans and Democrats were "destroying our country" and its political process. Sporting a beard and dreadlocks, the former Vietnam veteran also criticized the Iraq war.
Alex Jones and his film crew were able to set up a last minute interview with Ventura at a San Antonio restaurant after his appearance before a packed house at UTSA.
Ventura first stated that he had many unanswered questions about 9/11. The former Governor cited Operation Northwoods , a 1963 Joint Chiefs of Staff plan to stage terror attacks and kill American citizens to start a war with Cuba, as an example of how the U.S. government wanted to kill its own people and blame it on foreign enemies to justify war. Ventura found it painful, having dutifully served himself, that elements within the government would go to such barbaric and deceitful lengths to con its own populace into supporting militarism.
Ventura then raised the issue of the Gulf of Tonkin, citing recently released declassified information confirming that American ships were never attacked and the incident was manufactured in order to provide the entree to the Vietnam war. This was particularly unpalatable for Ventura because he joined as a Navy Seal on September 11 1969, fought in Vietnam and lost many friends there.
"The DVD of the resistance!" Get TerrorStorm on DVD today! Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and see it in high quality or watch it for free at Google Video .
Ventura asked that if the U.S. government were prepared to stage such a gargantuan historical event in terms of its significance in leading a nation to war then, why they would they refrain from doing so again today?
Ventura also highlighted 9/11 itself in contrasting the lax response of NORAD air defense to the four commercial airliners on 9/11 compared with the immediate interception of golfer Payne Stewart's Lear Jet in October 1999.
Ventura said that the argument that Americans should give up liberty in exchange for security in the war on terror was horrible and that government should never be trusted. He encouraged Americans to be skeptical of anything the government claims in light of their past duplicity.
Ventura seemed visibly upset during the interview, calling the American public apathetic, seemingly wanting to say more, and was very cynical that any real investigation would take place having already witnessed the 9/11 Commission's whitewash.
Ventura had previously aired his skepticism of the official version of events on Jay Leno and elaborated on a 2004 radio show but the former Governor went further than ever before during this interview.
Clips of the interview will be posted tonight and tomorrow for free. Watch this space.
Former Governor Jesse Ventura Questions Official 9/11 Story
Goes further than ever before, cites Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, NORAD stand down, staged war provocations
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com September 26 2006
Former Minnesota Governor, actor and wrestling star Jesse Ventura has publicly questioned the official version of events behind 9/11 and gone further than ever before in citing Operation Northwoods and the Gulf of Tonkin as examples of how the government has planned and carried out staged war provocations in the past.
Ventura has temporarily left his Baja Mexico surfing lifestyle to lend support to Texas gubernatorial candidate Kinky Friedman. At a press conference yesterday Ventura said that the Republicans and Democrats were "destroying our country" and its political process. Sporting a beard and dreadlocks, the former Vietnam veteran also criticized the Iraq war.
Alex Jones and his film crew were able to set up a last minute interview with Ventura at a San Antonio restaurant after his appearance before a packed house at UTSA.
Ventura first stated that he had many unanswered questions about 9/11. The former Governor cited Operation Northwoods , a 1963 Joint Chiefs of Staff plan to stage terror attacks and kill American citizens to start a war with Cuba, as an example of how the U.S. government wanted to kill its own people and blame it on foreign enemies to justify war. Ventura found it painful, having dutifully served himself, that elements within the government would go to such barbaric and deceitful lengths to con its own populace into supporting militarism.
Ventura then raised the issue of the Gulf of Tonkin, citing recently released declassified information confirming that American ships were never attacked and the incident was manufactured in order to provide the entree to the Vietnam war. This was particularly unpalatable for Ventura because he joined as a Navy Seal on September 11 1969, fought in Vietnam and lost many friends there.
"The DVD of the resistance!" Get TerrorStorm on DVD today! Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and see it in high quality or watch it for free at Google Video .
Ventura asked that if the U.S. government were prepared to stage such a gargantuan historical event in terms of its significance in leading a nation to war then, why they would they refrain from doing so again today?
Ventura also highlighted 9/11 itself in contrasting the lax response of NORAD air defense to the four commercial airliners on 9/11 compared with the immediate interception of golfer Payne Stewart's Lear Jet in October 1999.
Ventura said that the argument that Americans should give up liberty in exchange for security in the war on terror was horrible and that government should never be trusted. He encouraged Americans to be skeptical of anything the government claims in light of their past duplicity.
Ventura seemed visibly upset during the interview, calling the American public apathetic, seemingly wanting to say more, and was very cynical that any real investigation would take place having already witnessed the 9/11 Commission's whitewash.
Ventura had previously aired his skepticism of the official version of events on Jay Leno and elaborated on a 2004 radio show but the former Governor went further than ever before during this interview.
Clips of the interview will be posted tonight and tomorrow for free. Watch this space.
Popular Mechanics Debunked
From http://www.911blogger.com/node/3205
Popular Mechanics Debunked
9/11 Blogger /Jon Gold September 27 2006
A few weeks ago, I went into a Barnes & Noble looking for Barrie Zwicker's latest book, "Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11."
Before I got to the counter to ask if they had it in stock, I saw several copies of Popular Mechanics' new John McCain endorsed book called, "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts." They had them prominently displayed so everyone could see them.
Holding back an "upchuck", I walked up to the counter, and asked the girl if they had any of Barrie's book in stock. As it turned out, they didn't. They were nice enough to order me a copy.
While I was there, I do what I always do in a book store. I looked for books by authors within the 9/11 Truth Movement. I was able to find one copy of Michael Ruppert's book, but nothing else.
Admittedly, I have never read Popular Mechanics' book. Wait a second. What's Jon pulling? How can he debunk a book without even reading it?
Here's how you do it.
If you're a frequent visitor to this site, you will know that there are several people citing Popular Mechanics's book as if it was the "holy grail" for 9/11 answers.
In Reprehensor's thread entitled, "Norman Mineta’s Testimony Proves 9/11 Was an Inside Job", I found 3 instances from just one person. Ronald "Pomeroo" Wieck.
Reference #1: "The information on this subject is abundant; 911myths has an entire section and the Popular Mechanics book devotes a whole chapter."
Reference #2: "The basic knowledge about the FAA and NORAD is available in the Popular Mechanics book."
Reference #3: "why not respond to the very specific and detailed chapter in the Popular Mechanics book that deals with the stand down canard?"
It occurred to me after reading his responses that it wasn't Popular Mechanics that the family members lobbied to investigate the attacks of 9/11. It wasn't Popular Mechanics that turned away whistleblowers with pertinent information regarding the attacks of 9/11. It wasn't Popular Mechanics that was mandated to give a "full and complete accounting" of the attacks of 9/11. It wasn't Popular Mechanics that was recently called "Derelict in its' duties."
The families lobbied Washington D.C. and the media to implement an independent commission to investigate the attacks of 9/11. You may have heard of it. It was called The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, or if you prefer, The 9/11 Commission.
The 9/11 Commission, as you can see from their very own website, was mandated to:
provide a “full and complete accounting” of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and recommendations as to how to prevent such attacks in the future."
It was the 9/11 Commission that the families called "derelict in its duties."
What does it say that people like "pomeroo" need to refer to a book other than the 9/11 Commission's report to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth Movement?
It says that the final report released by the 9/11 Commission isn't worth the paper it was written on.
Donna Marsh O'Connor, a brave 9/11 family member, said at the National Press Club in Washington D.C., on the 5th Anniversary of the attacks:
This Government has made me a victim of Conspiracy Theories, because they haven't answered fully, or allowed anyone to ask the true questions of September 11th, and that's what I'm asking from you today. For exposure. We are not crazy. We have questions. We demand answers. [..] We're asking for a new investigation into the events of September 11th, and this time, a truly bipartisan, global, with families invested from the beginning, middle, and throughout the end.
Sorry, but Popular Mechanics' book doesn't cut it, and John McCain should be ashamed of himself.
Popular Mechanics Debunked
9/11 Blogger /Jon Gold September 27 2006
A few weeks ago, I went into a Barnes & Noble looking for Barrie Zwicker's latest book, "Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11."
Before I got to the counter to ask if they had it in stock, I saw several copies of Popular Mechanics' new John McCain endorsed book called, "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts." They had them prominently displayed so everyone could see them.
Holding back an "upchuck", I walked up to the counter, and asked the girl if they had any of Barrie's book in stock. As it turned out, they didn't. They were nice enough to order me a copy.
While I was there, I do what I always do in a book store. I looked for books by authors within the 9/11 Truth Movement. I was able to find one copy of Michael Ruppert's book, but nothing else.
Admittedly, I have never read Popular Mechanics' book. Wait a second. What's Jon pulling? How can he debunk a book without even reading it?
Here's how you do it.
If you're a frequent visitor to this site, you will know that there are several people citing Popular Mechanics's book as if it was the "holy grail" for 9/11 answers.
In Reprehensor's thread entitled, "Norman Mineta’s Testimony Proves 9/11 Was an Inside Job", I found 3 instances from just one person. Ronald "Pomeroo" Wieck.
Reference #1: "The information on this subject is abundant; 911myths has an entire section and the Popular Mechanics book devotes a whole chapter."
Reference #2: "The basic knowledge about the FAA and NORAD is available in the Popular Mechanics book."
Reference #3: "why not respond to the very specific and detailed chapter in the Popular Mechanics book that deals with the stand down canard?"
It occurred to me after reading his responses that it wasn't Popular Mechanics that the family members lobbied to investigate the attacks of 9/11. It wasn't Popular Mechanics that turned away whistleblowers with pertinent information regarding the attacks of 9/11. It wasn't Popular Mechanics that was mandated to give a "full and complete accounting" of the attacks of 9/11. It wasn't Popular Mechanics that was recently called "Derelict in its' duties."
The families lobbied Washington D.C. and the media to implement an independent commission to investigate the attacks of 9/11. You may have heard of it. It was called The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, or if you prefer, The 9/11 Commission.
The 9/11 Commission, as you can see from their very own website, was mandated to:
provide a “full and complete accounting” of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and recommendations as to how to prevent such attacks in the future."
It was the 9/11 Commission that the families called "derelict in its duties."
What does it say that people like "pomeroo" need to refer to a book other than the 9/11 Commission's report to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth Movement?
It says that the final report released by the 9/11 Commission isn't worth the paper it was written on.
Donna Marsh O'Connor, a brave 9/11 family member, said at the National Press Club in Washington D.C., on the 5th Anniversary of the attacks:
This Government has made me a victim of Conspiracy Theories, because they haven't answered fully, or allowed anyone to ask the true questions of September 11th, and that's what I'm asking from you today. For exposure. We are not crazy. We have questions. We demand answers. [..] We're asking for a new investigation into the events of September 11th, and this time, a truly bipartisan, global, with families invested from the beginning, middle, and throughout the end.
Sorry, but Popular Mechanics' book doesn't cut it, and John McCain should be ashamed of himself.
Osama bin Laden and Lee Harvey Oswald
From http://www.rense.com/general73/alee.htm
Osama bin Laden &
Lee Harvey Oswald
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
9-25-6
Aside from the uncanny similarity of names, LNO and OBL share some uncanny backgrounds.
Here is a brief sampling...
Oswald was a cold warrior, fighting communists.
Osama was a cold warrior, fighting communists.
Oswald was an accused murderer, never convicted of his great crime.
Osama was an accused murdered, never convicted of his great crime.
Oswald worked for the CIA.
Osama worked for the CIA.
Oswald is often pictured carrying a rifle.
Osama is often pictured carrying a rifle.
Oswald was reportedly a very poor shot.
Osama was reportedly a very poor shot.
Oswald denied his guilt, right up to his death.
Osama denied his guilt, right up to his death.
The US media accepted the official Oswald story.
The US media accepted the official Osama story.
A high government commission found Oswald guilty.
A high government commission found Osama guilty.
Within months, the catastrophic result of Oswald's alleged deed was an imperial war, lasting ten years, against insurgents---then called Vietcong---and an increasingly fascist American government,
Within months, the catastrophic result of Osama's alleged deed was an imperial war, lasting "eight, ten or a dozen years" against insurgents--now called terrorists---and an increasingly fascist American government.
.......
USAF veteran and amateur historian Douglas Herman wrote The Guns of Dallas, a suspense thriller examining the JFK assassination. email at douglasherman7@yahoo.com
Osama bin Laden &
Lee Harvey Oswald
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
9-25-6
Aside from the uncanny similarity of names, LNO and OBL share some uncanny backgrounds.
Here is a brief sampling...
Oswald was a cold warrior, fighting communists.
Osama was a cold warrior, fighting communists.
Oswald was an accused murderer, never convicted of his great crime.
Osama was an accused murdered, never convicted of his great crime.
Oswald worked for the CIA.
Osama worked for the CIA.
Oswald is often pictured carrying a rifle.
Osama is often pictured carrying a rifle.
Oswald was reportedly a very poor shot.
Osama was reportedly a very poor shot.
Oswald denied his guilt, right up to his death.
Osama denied his guilt, right up to his death.
The US media accepted the official Oswald story.
The US media accepted the official Osama story.
A high government commission found Oswald guilty.
A high government commission found Osama guilty.
Within months, the catastrophic result of Oswald's alleged deed was an imperial war, lasting ten years, against insurgents---then called Vietcong---and an increasingly fascist American government,
Within months, the catastrophic result of Osama's alleged deed was an imperial war, lasting "eight, ten or a dozen years" against insurgents--now called terrorists---and an increasingly fascist American government.
.......
USAF veteran and amateur historian Douglas Herman wrote The Guns of Dallas, a suspense thriller examining the JFK assassination. email at douglasherman7@yahoo.com