Friday, June 30, 2006
My Experiences and still promoting Freedom.
Recalling my life is a must to reevaute and make better judgments in the future. The battle for truth is still on. Wavering and compromising isn't in my intensions. The forceful and potent agenda of struggling for real freedom still rests within my conscience. Time has rapidly shown so many world developments, that it's amazing. From my childhood to my early adulthood, I lived through turbulent times from the Earthquakes, Waco, Oklahoma City bombing, the Olympic bombing of Atlanta, Flight TWA 800, 9/11, the Bali bombing, the Iraq War, the Madrid bombing, the London bombing, and other events. They remind me of the evil that is capable within man. Also, they let me know of the imperfections of government agencies and intelligence groups like MI6, CIA, Mossad, etc. For decades, the Central Intelligence Agency have been involved in coups, assassination, rigging votes, and other evil deeds. This is talked about in books, movies, talked about in websites, and educated professors have proven this. I have not forgotten to expose other groups like the Jesuits, Knights of Malta, and Opus Dei.
Qui Bono? or Who benefits from the billions of oil profits, controlling the majority of world's natural resources, the aftermath of the Iraq war (which many of the terror attacks were staged or provoked by Britian, America, and Israel. Many in the West are constructing permament bases in Iraq today. Iraq was never a real direct threat to America. Even on October 2002, 90-page, top-secret report, drafted by the National Intelligence Council at Langley was reached to President proving that Iraq wasn't a real immediate threat to America. Yet, George W. Bush afterwards told people that Iraq was a direct threat to America. If that isn't a lie, I don't know what is. Many other lies came out of the administration as well), the suppression of civil liberties globally, and the economic problems in the world. It certainly isn't the middle class. It has to be those in international geo-political groups, Secret Societies, and heads of multinational corporations running the world's policies. It's like imperalism by these elitists using the Neo Cons (most of the PNAC writers were in the CFR like Dick Cheney, Norman Podhoretz, etc.) as one of the executors of their agenda. The CFR implements policies are so much in love with globalism.
The Supreme Court ruled about military tribunals and Guantamano Bay. LOLITA C. BALDOR from the AP on June 30, 2006 discussed this issue. The decision was that the Supreme Court said that the President doesn't have unlimited executive powers dealing with those accused of terrorism. It further says that military tribunals can't be used, yet Congress can create military tribunals if Bush wants to. Since January 2002, the United States used Gitmo as housing suspected "terrorists." Reality dictates that torture occured there and worldwide. Also, none of men there were high level al-Qaeda members at all. Many of these people were retrieved from the battlefield in the mist of warfare against the Taliban. More than 1/2 of the total detainees are not accused of any hostile acts. There has been a lot of Geneva Convention talk, especially by neo-conservatives like Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity. The truth is that the Foruth Geneva Convention applies to civilians, not only those who have an uniform or fighting for a recognized country. Even stranger is the following fact. The United States shipped out about 8,000 pro-al-Qaeda/Taliban fighters to Pakistan in 2001 when Kunduz fell.
Many of these devices have the power of 50,000 volts of electricity. According to Amnesty International, over 100 people died from taser related incidents. Police brutality is still apart of us, even though not all police officers are evil. KAREEM FAHIM from New York Times on June 30 , 2006 talked about tasers. A 35 year old man was tasered to death by an officer in a Queens station house. The NYPD claimed that they were justified in using the weapon against the man (whose name is Terrence L. Thomas), yet the police department is having an investigation of the unfortunate event. Big Brother had reached into a whole new disgusting level. Defense Tech on June 29, 2006 talked about a possible new blimp that has the power to watch over an entire city. DARPA is dealing with such a program and device called ISIS, short for "Integrated Sensor Is Structure." It's ver futuristic, yet real. DARPA (the ones who invented the Internet) plain to park it 65,000 ft. in the air to spot troops 185 miles away. Darpa, along with the Air Force Research Lab, just handed Lockheed Martin the latest in a $42.5 million series of contracts to build it. It's planned to be finished by 2011. This blimp also is going to have a satellite.
AP on June 29, 2006 has an article written by MIKE STOBBE on about how a government advisory group recommends Cervical Cancer Vaccination for Pre-Teens (i.e. girls who are 11 or 12 years old). Gardasil, which is the name of the first vaccine used for cervical cancer, was made by Merck & Co. (MRK). The FDA approved it in claiming that it prevents strains of the human papilloma virus, or HPV, which can cause genital warts and vaginal cancers. The real truth is that vaccines are never 100% perfect at all.
Dr. Blaylock and other experts document the many serious negative consequences of the usage of vaccines. In his Blaylock Wellness Report, he writes that vaccines increase the risk of childhood diseases , even Gulf War Syndrome and Lou Gehrig’s disease. He rightfully exposes the mandatory vaccination deal, which is not only activitely supported by the government. Vaccinations are also promoted by numerous pharmaceutical corporations. Dr. Len Horowitz is another author who has written about this subject. Well, it's bigger than vaccines. Genetically modified food, aspartame, flouride, and mercury, and very real poisons in the world that not only can damage the environment, but harm the human body also. This is related to the dehumanization of human life like the evil murder of abortion. The dehumanization is so bad that a Chinese company are making cosemetics from the skin of executed prisoners.
As for the offical story of 9/11, it has been exposed as a total lie. In 2006, a physicist Steven Jones, Jim Fetzer, historians, scholars, government officals, celebrites, and everyday people are exposing 9/11 as an inside job now. Recently, Jim Fetzer discussed about 9/11 with Laura Ingraham in her radio program. Laura, like the Neo Con that she is, mocked Jim's views without refuting it. They can never refute what real Patriots say, so the Neo Cons will mock people. Kevin Barrett, another member of the 9/11 Truth Movement, is threaten by a Wisconsin lawmaker to be fired. The reason is that Kevin is just saying that the offical story is false. Kevin has his First Amendment right to believe in what he wants about 9/11. These people who hate their offical story refuted are angry that more and more people are waking up. People are waking up to the stand down of the military of the aircraft and how Building Number 7 fell in a symmetrical fashion (when no aircraft hit the Building. All indications prove that it fell by a controlled demolition).
I don't care about people talking about me in a false or negative way. I respond to my critics, I'm still strong, and I don't back down. I come out people's names, but I won't call people degatory names. There's a difference. I am a man and don't come out bashing people unfairly. I don't go out and label people "losers" because I disagree with someone. That is real. As for me, I support all patriotic and good Jewish people, Arabic people, and people of every nation on the face of the Earth. While I'm here breathing on this Earth, my goal will expose evil and expand my thinking into discussing even more issues. George W. Bush endorses "a new order of the ages" in his 2005 Inaugural Address. Bush endorses the United Nations and UNESCO. On the other hand, we must pursue pure nationalism and the principles found in the Bill of Rights and Constitution. The media and the White House tells us that this war will last over 100 years, but I dissent with the lust for illegal wars. I seek real freedom and non-compromise with evil.
By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
The Stock Market
Contraception Deception: The Abortion Rights Movement Plays Word Games to Hide Abortion
Contraception: June 30, 2006
Contraception Deception: The Abortion Rights Movement Plays Word Games to Hide Abortion
Abortion rights advocates have been accusing the pro-life movement of trying to redefine pregnancy and reclassify certain contraceptives as abortifacients. In essence, they have been charging that the movement has not been telling the truth about contraception but instead has been playing word games in an effort to ban it.
The truth is, it was the abortion rights and family planning movements that have been playing word games for the past few decades, and the pro-life movement is simply trying to correct the damage.
This decades old controversy revolves around the definition of a single word: conception.
Up until the mid sixties, the question of the beginning of pregnancy wasn't a subject of serious debate. It was well accepted, based upon sound science, that, that conception occurred at fertilization (that is, the union of sperm and egg).
It was also accepted that anything which prevented implantation in fact caused an abortion, as recognized by the US Government and described in a 1963 public health service leaflet:
"All the measures which impair the viability of the zygote [newly created human] at any time between the instant of fertilization [union of sperm and egg] and the completion of labor constitute, in the strict sense, procedures for inducing abortion" 
This acknowledgement posed a problem for the family planning movement which was moving away from "pure" contraceptives and more towards drugs which also caused early abortions by preventing implantation of a newly created human being. The only way to make these drugs legally and morally acceptable to the general public was to change the definition of conception.
This is where the American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) stepped in. In 1965 the ACOG issued a medical bulletin which "officially" changed the definition of conception from union of sperm and egg to implantation: "Conception is the implantation of a fertilized ovum [egg].” 
Suddenly, under this new definition, drugs which were recognized as abortifacients now only prevented pregnancy – and could now be called contraceptives.
The excuse the ACOG gave for the change was that fertilization could not be detected – a fact that had been already well established. Prior to 1965, this flawed reasoning was never formally accepted as reason for change. It was political agenda, not scientific progress, which prompted the change by the ACOG – it had nothing to do with advances in biology, embryology, or gynecology.
As a result of this change, over the decades women have been told that their contraceptives drugs didn’t cause abortions, and that they would not work if they were already pregnant – and therefore morally acceptable.
But this is deceptive and based upon misinformation and distortion of scientific fact. Changing a definition does not change reality – that a woman’s body is carrying a distinct and new human being and hence pregnant, whether or not that fact is detectable.
Women aren’t being told the entire truth about their contraceptives, and it’s time for members of the ACOG to tell their patients the truth.
The same deception is being played out in the debate over emergency contraception. Notice what the makers of Plan B state regarding how their drug works:
"Plan B® is similar to a birth control pill and is believed to act as an emergency contraceptive by: …Altering the endometrium, which may inhibit implantation …Plan B® is not effective once the process of implantation has begun; it will not affect an existing pregnancy... "
The ACOG has been heavily promoting Plan B with its “Ask Me” emergency contraception campaign. In essence, they are peddling drugs which are capable of causing early abortions as a solution to preventing abortion. It doesn’t take much to realize that abortion isn’t prevented with an earlier abortion.
Pro-life advocates are not changing definitions – they are simply restoring them to their scientific meanings, free of agenda driven bias. If the pro-choice crowd can't do this because many contraceptives would be known as abortion drugs, that is no one's fault but their own.
Footnotes  Public Health Service Leaflet no. 1066, US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1963, 27  American College of Gynecology Terminology Bulletin (September 1965)  The official Plan B website, “For Prescribers: How Plan B Works”.
ABOUT THE AUTHORRuben Obregon is the the President and co-founder of No Room for Contraception. He has worked in the pro-family movement for the past 16 years on issues ranging from education to marriage.
Posted by mary at June 30, 2006 10:08 AM
Subscribe with Bloglines Prior Articles:
Condom use reduces women's HPV risk? - Jun 22, 2006
"Birth Control Is Selfish" ... The Message Society Doesn't Want To Hear - May 27, 2006
Doyle Signs Abstinence Bill into Law - May 23, 2006
Will we choke on the pill? - May 18, 2006
What's the real story about Plan B? - May 09, 2006
Anniversary of the FDA's approval of the Pill - May 09, 2006
"Contra-Contraception..." and for a Good Reason: You Don't Have to be Christian to be Against Birth Control - May 08, 2006
Dreaming of a World Gone Sane - May 03, 2006
WINGTV's response to accusations of being a snitch.
is the link.
It's only fair to see their side of their story and allow everyone to make up their own mind.
Concentrate of China? by David J. Stewart
Concentrate of China?
by David J. Stewart
I was eating dinner with my family the other day in our back yard. We really love eating outside with the fresh air and a light breeze. You might think it strange, but we really enjoy sitting under the picnic table umbrella while it's lightly raining. It's a lot of fun. Anyway...I reached over for the container of Apple Juice to pour some more into my glass. I've always like to read labels on whatever I'm eating or drinking...so I took a look at the side of the plastic container. I couldn't believe what I read, "Concentrate of China." You've got to be kidding me?, I thought.
Now even our Apple Juice is coming from China???
Yes, that is sadly the truth. America is no longer America. If you sit down and think about all the things which you use during the average day...you'll see what I mean. Please carefully read the following...
Joe Smith started the day early having set his alarm clock (MADE IN JAPAN) for 6 a.m. While his coffeepot (MADE IN CHINA) was perking, he shaved with his electric razor (MADE IN HONG KONG). He put on a dress shirt (MADE IN SRI LANKA), designer jeans (MADE IN SINGAPORE) and tennis shoes (MADE IN KOREA). After cooking his breakfast in his new electric skillet (MADE IN INDIA) he sat down with his calculator (MADE IN MEXICO) to see how much he could spend today. After setting his watch (MADE IN TAIWAN) to the radio (MADE IN INDIA) he got in his car (MADE IN GERMANY) and continued his search for a good paying AMERICAN JOB. At the end of yet another discouraging and fruitless day, Joe decided to relax for a while. He put on his sandals (MADE IN BRAZIL) poured himself a glass of wine (MADE IN FRANCE) and turned on his TV (MADE IN INDONESIA), and then wondered why he can't find a good paying job in.....AMERICA!
Is anything made in the United States anymore? Now even our Apple Juice is from China. Whatever happened to Washington State apples? The U.S. in in deep trouble! We don't manufacture hardly anything anymore in the U.S. Is it any wonder why we can't find decent jobs anymore? We have become a "service" economy, passing money around that has nothing of real value backing it. It's all a big mirage folks! The bubble of false security will one day collapse. The stock market is nothing but a mirage of false value. Think about it...what makes a stock worth $20, or $50? The honest truth is that most stocks are only worth pennies on the dollar. You're playing a fool's game if your invested heavily in the stock market. The crash is coming! I'm talking about the crash that will never return. We've been duped as U.S. citizens. The entire stock market is an increasingly corrupt scam.
Dark days are ahead friend. The cashless society is coming. You won't be signing for credit card transactions, you will be entering a security code. National ID cards and microchips will be the norm. I heard yesterday that 30,000,000 Americans will be in prison by the year 2020. Could this be? It's like the Russian Gulags all over again. I'm not trying to scare you, but you should be scared. The government is going to be using prison inmates for free labor, just as in the days of the Gulags. Fifteen percent of the population went into interment camps to work in the Gulags. Did you know that the Clinton Administration built massive prisons across America? Did you know that under the Reagan Administration that Operation Garden Plot was developed? This is a internment camp system for Americans. Read up on it...it should scare you. Why would our government even think such a thing? Could it be because they're hiding something so diabolical from us that we will revolt when we find out? Yes, that IS the reason. It's true! Our country has been hi-jacked by evil power-hungry globalist rich people who care not for God or freedom. Christians will once again be beheaded...it's coming.
It's sickening to know that our nation is even trading with a communist nation such as China. Do you realize that women are FORCED to have abortions in China? Do you realize that China is the leading exporter of body parts throughout the world? Do you realize that China forces many women to become sterile? Have you ever read the book titled, "The China Threat?" Read it! China is no friend of America and they would love to destroy our nation.
Don't think for one second that some back-desert Arabs were behind 911. It was our own government responsible for 911...and George Bush Jr. is a criminal in my opinion. The CIA stopped the FBI from investigating the Bin Laden family. The FBI was having a mock terrorist drill the day of 911 (how convenient). Top Washington officials were told not to fly on the day of 911. U.S. troops were already in place on the Afghanistan border months in advance of 911. Afghanistan was and still IS the top producer of the world's heroine (opium). Why would the U.S. government allow them to keep growing and exporting such evil substances while American tax-payer are being ravaged for billions of dollars in Anti-drug programs? The answer is simple...our own government is the biggest illegal drug dealer on the planet. Ask people working in congress such as Maxine Waters, Cynthia McKinney and Ron Paul about the drug problem. Ask Alex Jones. Ask Mike Ruppert, former LAPD narcotics officer. Ask!
There have been volumes of books written on these subjects, but the average person doesn't care enough to read them. People don't care until it affects them. The government is doing everything they can to pull the wool over our eyes and to keep us happy...until the final moment when the imminent disaster can be held back no longer. The dam is going to break folks!!! We haven't seen anything yet. You had better wake up! You need to warn everybody you know about these things. Don't play into the governments game.
America is no longer America...let's fight to keep her free! Say no to the Patriot Acts. Say no to more government control. Say no to national ID's. Say no to microchips. Say no to giving up your personal information. Say no to any invasion of your personal privacy. Say no to government sponsored programs that seek to undermine your freedoms. Say no to the New World Order. Say no to globalism. Say no to losing any more jobs to foreign nations. Let's open our mouths wide.
Most of all, America needs churches with preachers who preach!!! Let's fight the devil and support our local soulwinning, Independent Baptist, Bible-believing, churches. As individuals we can do little, but as a group we can do much more. We need preachers who love people, but hate injustice and lies. We need preachers who aren't just trying to make a living. America's pulpits have become dry and stale. We need preachers like Billy Sunday to preach repentance once again. Are you that man? Join the fight!
Yes, Bush lied
Yes, Bush lied
Posted: October 6, 20031:00 a.m. Eastern
WASHINGTON – A year ago, on Oct. 1, one of the most important documents in U.S. history was published and couriered over to the White House.
The 90-page, top-secret report, drafted by the National Intelligence Council at Langley, included an executive summary for President Bush known as the "key judgments." It summed up the findings of the U.S. intelligence community regarding the threat posed by Iraq, findings the president says formed the foundation for his decision to preemptively invade Iraq without provocation. The report "was good, sound intelligence," Bush has remarked.
Most of it deals with alleged weapons of mass destruction.
But page 4 of the report, called the National Intelligence Estimate, deals with terrorism, and draws conclusions that would come as a shock to most Americans, judging from recent polls on Iraq. The CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency and the other U.S. spy agencies unanimously agreed that Baghdad:
had not sponsored past terrorist attacks against America,
was not operating in concert with al-Qaida,
and was not a terrorist threat to America.
"We have no specific intelligence information that Saddam's regime has directed attacks against U.S. territory," the report stated.
However, it added, "Saddam, if sufficiently desperate, might decide that only an organization such as al-Qaida could perpetrate the type of terrorist attack that he would hope to conduct."
Sufficiently desperate? If he "feared an attack that threatened the survival of the regime," the report explained.
"In such circumstances," it added, "he might decide that the extreme step of assisting the Islamist terrorists in conducting a CBW [chemical and biological weapons] attack against the United States would be his last chance to exact vengeance by taking a large number of victims with him."
In other words, only if Saddam were provoked by U.S. attack would he even consider taking the "extreme step" of reaching out to al-Qaida, an organization with which he had no natural or preexisting relationship. He wasn't about to strike the U.S. or share his alleged weapons with al-Qaida – unless the U.S. struck him first and threatened the collapse of his regime.
Now turn to the next page of the same NIE report, which is considered the gold standard of intelligence reports. Page 5 ranks the key judgments by confidence level – high, moderate or low.
According to the consensus of Bush's intelligence services, there was "low confidence" before the war in the views that "Saddam would engage in clandestine attacks against the U.S. Homeland" or "share chemical or biological weapons with al-Qaida."
Their message to the president was clear: Saddam wouldn't help al-Qaida unless we put his back against the wall, and even then it was a big maybe. If anything, the report was a flashing yellow light against attacking Iraq.
Bush saw the warning, yet completely ignored it and barreled ahead with the war plans he'd approved a month earlier (Aug. 29), telling a completely different version of the intelligence consensus to the American people. Less than a week after the NIE was published, he warned that "on any given day" – provoked by attack or not, sufficiently desperate or not – Saddam could team up with Osama and conduct a joint terrorist operation against America using weapons of mass destruction.
"Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists," Bush said Oct. 7 in his nationally televised Cincinnati speech. "Alliance with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving fingerprints." The terrorists he was referring to were "al-Qaida members."
By telling Americans that Saddam could "on any given day" slip unconventional weapons to al-Qaida if America didn't disarm him, the president misrepresented the conclusions of his own secret intelligence report, which warned that Saddam wouldn't even try to reach out to al-Qaida unless he were attacked and had nothing to lose – and might even find that hard to do since he had no history of conducting joint terrorist operations with al-Qaida, and certainly none against the U.S.
If that's not lying, I don't know what is.
What's worse, the inconvenient conclusions about Iraq and al-Qaida were withheld from the unclassified version of the secret NIE report that Bush authorized for public release the day before his Cincinnati speech, as part of the launch of the White House's campaign to sell the war. The 25-page white paper, posted on the CIA website, focused on alleged weapons of mass destruction, and conveniently left out the entire part about Saddam's reluctance to reach out to al-Qaida. Americans also didn't see the finding that Saddam had no hand in 9-11 or any other al-Qaida attack against American territory. That, too, was sanitized.
Over the following months, in speech after speech, Bush went right on lying with impunity about the Iraq-al-Qaida threat, all the while flouting the judgments of his own intelligence agencies.
Even after the war, Bush continued the lie. "We have removed an ally of al-Qaida," he said May 1 from the deck of the USS Lincoln. "No terrorist network will gain weapons of mass destruction from the Iraqi regime."
In the glaring absence of any hard proof of either those alleged weapons or al-Qaida links, the White House press corps has finally put down their stenographer's pads and started asking tough questions, forcing the president to at least level with the American people about Saddam's assumed role in 9-11.
"We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the Sept. 11" attacks, Bush confessed last month, finally repeating for the public what his own intelligence services had told him a year earlier.
The president's spokespeople say they're shocked, shocked, to learn that seven in 10 Americans tell pollsters they blame Saddam Hussein for the 9-11 attacks. Gee, they pondered, wherever did they get such an idea?
Oh, maybe from all the president's speeches and remarks suggesting Saddam was to blame for 9-11, starting with this one:
"Prior to Sept. 11, we thought two oceans would protect us," President Bush said about Iraq in an Oct. 14 speech in Michigan. "After Sept. 11, we've entered into a new era in a new war.
"This is a man that we know has had connections with al-Qaida," he continued, referring to Saddam. "This is a man who, in my judgment, would like to use al-Qaida as a forward army. And this is a man that we must deal with for the sake of peace."
Or this one:
"Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country," Bush said March 6 in a White House news conference. "The attacks of Sept. 11 showed what the enemies of America did with four airplanes. We will not wait to see what terrorists or terrorist states could do with weapons of mass destruction."
"Used to be that we could think that you could contain a person like Saddam Hussein, that oceans would protect us from his type of terror," he said at the same press conference. "Sept. 11 should say to the American people that we're now a battlefield, that weapons of mass destruction in the hands of a terrorist organization could be deployed here at home."
In that press conference, Bush mentioned the Sept. 11 attacks nine times, Saddam 40 times, and Osama zero, effectively morphing Osama into Saddam, as I pointed out in a column just before the war.
During the war, Bush said he couldn't leave "enemies free to plot another Sept. 11 – this time, perhaps, with chemical, biological or nuclear terror."
In that April 5 radio address, he added: "We'll remove weapons of mass destruction from the hands of mass murderers."
Even when we found no weapons to remove, he continued to distort the truth about Iraq and 9-11.
"We will not wait for known enemies to strike us again," he said Aug. 26 in an American Legion speech, rationalizing his Iraq attack. "We will strike them before they hit more of our cities and kill more of our citizens."
The juxtaposition was no accident. Just as it was no accident that the White House timed the media rollout of its war campaign for the first 9-11 anniversary.
No wonder 71 percent of Americans told University of Maryland pollsters after the war that they believe the "Bush administration implied that Iraq under Saddam Hussein was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks." A more recent Washington Post poll, as well as other polls, came up with roughly the same number.
Sadly, it's the small minority of respondents who said they saw no connection at all who most accurately reflect the views of the U.S. intelligence community, proving again the power of unfiltered propaganda.
A smoking gun found now wouldn't even undo the lies. It wouldn't negate the fact that the president had no such evidence before the war when he claimed Saddam and Osama were thick as thieves, contradicting the intelligence community's threat assessment. He simply turned around and told the public a whopper.
Forget that Bush lied about the reasons for putting our sons and daughters in harm's way in Iraq; and forget that he sent 140,000 troops there with bull's-eyes on their backs, then dared their attackers to bring it on.
It was the height of irresponsibility to have done so in the middle of a war on al-Qaida, the real and proven threat to America. Bush diverted those troops and other resources – including intelligence assets, Arabic translators and hundreds of billions of tax dollars – from the hunt for Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaida leaders along the Afghan-Pakistani border. And now they've regrouped and are as threatening as ever.
That's inexcusable, and Bush supporters with any intellectual honesty and concern for their own families' safety should be mad as hell about it – and that's coming from someone who voted for Bush.
Saddam bin Laden
Anatomy of a radioactive lie
IT’S THE LAW! FEDS PAVE THE WAY TO TOLL AND PRIVATIZE THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS
IT’S THE LAW! FEDS PAVE THE WAY TO TOLL AND PRIVATIZE THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS
Infowars.com June 29, 2006
By Bob Dacy
On July 29, 2005, President Bush signed a bill which permits and promotes the charging of tolls on existing and planned interstate highways, bridges, and tunnels. Before the passage of the bill, known as SAFETEA-LU, or “Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users”, it was generally illegal to charge tolls on roads built with Federal funds. What’s more, the tolls collected will be automatic, requiring universally compatible toll transponder tags on every vehicle.
SAFETEA-LU makes possible a variety of programs, all aimed at forcing Americans to pay to travel. To wit:
* “Interstate System Reconstruction & Rehabilitation Pilot Program” allows the tolling of existing interstate highways, bridges, and tunnels to fund repair of existing highways.
* “Interstate System Construction Toll Pilot Program” authorizes tolling existing facilities on the interstate system to fund new interstate highways.
* “Value Pricing Pilot (VPP) Program” allows new tolls on existing toll free facilities such as high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, tolls on new lanes added to existing highways, and electronically collected variable tolls on existing and new toll facilities.
* “Express Lanes Demonstration Program” allows tolling to finance new lanes. Automatic toll collection is REQUIRED and revenue collected may be used to provide a reasonable rate of return on PRIVATE financing, operation, and maintenance costs.
* “High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Facilities, SAFETEA-LU Section 1121 (23 USC 166)” authorizes states to build high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes on interstate and non-interstate facilities.
Although most of these programs are experimental, the mindset they demonstrate and the precedents they intend to set will have devastating consequences on all Americans. The mindset is that Americans are lab rats in a maze, who must be tagged and tracked everywhere they go. Cockroaches control the maze. The consequences to the heretofore taken for granted freedom to travel and to individual pocketbooks are ominous.
Imagine for a moment what must have been going through the minds of the six-legged elites when they thought up this diabolical scheme. The question is “How do you destroy the national sovereignty of the United States, merge it with the rest of the western hemisphere, build the infrastructure system needed to link up the entire landmass, confiscate private property on a wholesale level, spy on everyone’s comings and goings, and trick American suckers into paying for their own demise all in one fell swoop ? The answer: TOLL EVERYTHING!
As with any diabolical plot, many problems and obstacles had to be removed in order to insure success. As the Wicked Witch of the West once said, “The question is `how to do it`. These things must be done delicately, or you’ll hurt the spell”.
The first obstacle is that it is generally illegal to toll federally funded roads. No problem…just sneak section 1604 into a telephone book sized highway bill and no one will notice. Everyone knows Congressmen and Senators do not actually read the bills they vote on.
How do you get the super rich elites to go along with the plan? Simple…give them a piece of the action. Construction contracts will go to selected insiders and toll facilities will be given to private investors. We will call it “public-private partnership”.
But wait! State by state, the local politicians must be persuaded to pass legislation to further the scheme. How to do it? Tell the contractors to write the necessary legislation, line the campaign coffers of key legislators, convince the Governor of each state that it was his idea via more campaign contributions, and sneak the bills through the state legislatures when nobody is looking. After all, state representatives do not read the bills they vote on either.
Yet another requirement in order to pull this off is to keep the unwashed masses in the dark It would not do to have the sheep to find out they are about to be shorn. So how do you keep the press quiet? No problem…we control the press! The watchdog will remain asleep, and no one will find out until it is a done deal. Besides, when the cretins begin to realize what is going on, they will complain to their local transportation officials and wonder why no one is listening. Just don’t let the slaves know that the “massa” barking the orders resides in New York City at the headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
But the Constitution stands in the way of the plot. What to do about the pesky supreme law of the land which prohibits the taking of private land and handing it over to other private entities? How fortunate that the globalist infested Supreme Court, in June of 2005, legislated from the bench by re-writing the takings clause of the 5th Amendment in Kelo vs. City of New London. Now the Supremes say it is okay to force people to sell their land to private developers who promise a kickback to the government, we are free to proceed with the tolling of America.
Still one more problem must be overcome. We must propagandize transportation officials into believing this is a great idea so they can sell it to private investors and politicos nationwide. ADVERTISING is the key. We will get the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials to put up a website called www.innovativefinance.org.
It will be a veritable “how to” encyclopedia of fascism, but we will call it “public-private partnership” because “fascism” does not roll so well off of the tongue. Multi-millionaire highway contractors and local politicians will be able to swill at the federal trough to their hearts content. It will be a win-win setup for everyone except regular Americans, who are just being set up.
This malicious plan is being implemented all across America. Such plots survive and thrive only in the dark. It is time to turn on the lights and watch the cockroaches run. In Texas, pro-toll politicians have been replaced with anti-toll newcomers. This trend must continue, and spread like a wildfire of truth throughout the country. The alarm clock is ringing. Wake up. Get up. Open your eyes. Get out the roach spray. Fumigate your house. Go wake up your neighbors.
Greg Szymanski's articles
Other information in the world.
The real Real Evil Doers by Cliff Hughes
I believe, through research, that our CIA, FBI and a few members of our government, were being led by the globalists to bomb Oklahoma and 9-11 in our country (9-11 was the most sophisticated terror attack to date, along with the propaganda.)
There are over 600 factual errors with the government's story about 9-11 http://www.infowars.com/sept11_archive.htm http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html
-- Most Europeans 60+% are in tune with the work of the globalist and their activities (they have been living it for hundreds of years.) Just a few years ago it came out in the main stream media that MI5 was behind the war with Ireland and England. MI5 would secretly play both sides of the coin. When things were peaceful and "normal" they would work with small cells and blow up a bus full of their own British children to get the war started up again. They would always provocateur (read provoke) things and use it to their means. Same thing with Mossad, they play both the Jewish and the Palestine sides of the same coin.
To keep their military state legitimate and to control their territory. It's all about control. Here at home, if you research the KKK and skin-head groups you will find that the FBI and CIA had provocateurs to inflame these groups too, and in most cases used them as patsies to complete their mission. Yes, the FBI and CIA do fight small cells and groups, but they're the ones that THEY DON'T CONTROL. These are the loners that Bush, Ashcroft and Tom Ridge of Homeland Security say we must be fearful of. That is why they need the Patriot Act. Eventually the new terrorists will be Christian groups, home schooled, gun owners, Constitutionalists, militia/Patriots and Freedom-Fighters. I believe the list of terrorists will eventually broaden to any person or group that criticizes the government or leaders in power. I believe they are already in their cross-hairs and will be rounded up and imprisoned using The Patriot Act. Far fetched? That is exactly what Hitler did when he came into power, After he burned the Reichstag (congress building) down and blamed it on his political enemies he was overwhelmingly put in as dictator to "ease fear" and give security back to the German citizens. But what he did was restrict freedom and he used fear to control the citizens.
He took control of the presses and locked up anyone who criticized the Homeland. Books were burned, teachers disappeared. Tattle-tale squads were in full force. Newspapers and radio-stations were shut down or reprogrammed. Children were taught to love the Homeland and Hitler above all - even their fathers, mothers and God. Church leaders were re-educated or hung. Free-thinkers, gypsies, homosexuals, impure blood-lined people (Poles, Europeans, Muslims, Immigrants, Russians) and of course the Jews were all sent to concentration camps and their deaths. Had Hitler won the war, he even planned on executing all religious leaders and replacing spirituality with state worship, with himself being "a human God." But Hitler did not stop there. He slowly got rid of the rights to own firearms.
He mandated a universal ID card. He forced citizens to join the Homeland. Men were drafted and women worked the factories. Young children were indoctrinated into actually being children of the state. He started the Eugenics program and implemented the slaughter of anyone human who wasn't pure. He brainwashed entire generations into believing he was on the morale high ground, and that God was on his side. He was an occultist, He prayed to Satan and dressed as a Christian. He twisted good and evil. What is so astonishing is that the German citizens bought into his lies. And of course the German citizens helped the Nazi machine accomplish its mission. He could not have accomplished his evil without the help of the globalist. Companies such as pharmaceutical, technology, car makers, as well as kings, queens, royalty, bankers and other elites helped him into power. Its really quite simple, if you can think outside the box.The New World Order needs, and uses chaos. They want the world to see that they are our Savior, that they can control evil and evil doers, and that only they can bring peace to a fearful population.
Fascists and the Communists used to be the brainchildren of the globalist, now it is the Terrorist. I believe, through my research that the people of the Middle East, Iran, Iraq, Syria (the Muslims) as well as most of the citizens of this country, are just being played like a fine violin, to the globalists needs. I believe that this Iraq, Afghanistan, 9-11, war on terror is just a ruse. Eventually the UN will come in as our savior, to clean up this mess Bush/Clinton made. And the world will see that the only way to peace is through the globalists. I'm not afraid of boogie-men with box-cutters. The real enemy is the elites who call the shots, run the game and take control. When the "made up terrorists" attack us, and yes they will attack us again, the globalists will be behind it. Will the citizens look at the facts and stand up, or will we beg for security, give up our rights, and grovel to the puppets and their handlers?
News Agency Apologizes to Ariz. Candidate
Google Aims to Keep Track of Your Credit Card
Thursday, June 29, 2006
The Middle East Quagmire by Ron Paul
The Middle East Quagmire
Get out of the Middle East!
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
America's Friend: The Honorable Congressman Ron Paul
The death of PLO chairman Yasser Arafat last week once again brings the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the international forefront. The Bush administration finds itself in an uncomfortable but familiar role as peacemaker for yet another intractable, ancient, and deadly Middle East conflict. The popular press and political world both accept without question the notion that the United States is somehow responsible for resolving any and all conflicts around the globe, but especially in Palestine.
We conveniently forget, however, that American tax dollars militarized the entire region in the first place. We give Israel about $3 billion each year, but we also give Egypt $2 billion. Most other Middle East countries get money too, some of which ends up in the hands of Palestinian terrorists. Both sides have far more military weapons as a result. Talk about adding fuel to the fire! Our foolish and unconstitutional foreign aid has produced more violence, not less.
Congress and each successive administration pledge their political, financial, and military support for Israel. Yet while we call ourselves a strong ally of the Israeli people, we send billions in foreign aid every year to some Muslim states that many Israelis regard as enemies. From the Israeli point of view, many of the same Islamic nations we fund with our tax dollars want to destroy the Jewish state. Many average Israelis and American Jews see America as hypocritically hedging its bets.
This illustrates perfectly the inherent problem with foreign aid: once we give money to one country, we have to give it to all the rest or risk making enemies. This is especially true in the Middle East and other strife-torn regions, where our financial support for one side is seen as an act of aggression by the other. Just as our money never makes Israel secure, it doesn’t buy us any true friends elsewhere in the region. On the contrary, many Muslims hate the United States despite the billions we give to their governments.
It is time to challenge the notion that it is our job to broker peace in the Middle East and every other troubled region across the globe. America can and should use every diplomatic means at our disposal to end the violence in the West Bank, but we should draw the line at any further entanglement. Third-party outsiders cannot impose political solutions in Palestine or anywhere else. Peace can be achieved only when self-determination operates freely in all nations. “Peace plans” imposed by outsiders or the UN cause resentment and seldom produce lasting peace.
Respect for self-determination really is the cornerstone of a sensible foreign policy, yet many Americans who strongly support U.S. sovereignty advocate interventionist policies that deny other nations that same right. The interventionist approach that has dominated American foreign policy since World War I has produced an unmitigated series of disasters. From Korea to Vietnam to Kosovo to the Middle East, American military and economic meddling has made numerous conflicts worse, not better. Washington and Jefferson had it right when they warned against entangling alliances, and the history of the 20th century proves their point. The simple truth is that we cannot resolve every human conflict across the globe, and there will always be violence somewhere on earth. The fatal conceit lies in believing America can impose geopolitical solutions wherever it chooses.
November 16, 2004
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
Ron Paul Archives
Governments to decide future of net
About 9/11 and other issues.
The Grassy Knoll Show
Audio: 911: Matthew Tartaglia
Thu Jun 29, 2006 13:46
Audio: 911: Matthew TartagliaGround Zero Rescue Worker Seargent Matthew Tartaglia interviewed by The Vyzygoth on The Grassy Knoll Show.
Americans Can't Win - caught between a corrupt gov't and a corrupt MSM
The Truth Will Set You Free June 28 2006
I knew there was something fishy about our corporate-owned media ratting out our corporate-owned government. It's simply a matter of which corporate interests hang in the balance. In the end, working Americans lose, no matter who they support in this financial surveillance fiasco.
According to the reports in the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, the financial tracking program was part of an aggressive post-Sept. 11 effort to gather intelligence, tapping into the world's largest financial communication network for information on bank transfers.
The network — run by the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT — carries up to 12.7 million messages a day. Those messages typically include names and account numbers of bank customers — private citizens and HUGE CORPORATIONS ALIKE — that are sending or receiving funds.
That's where the buck stops folks. The NYT doesn't care about us OR our privacy. They care about corporate freedom to engage in unfettered shady financial transactions without ANYONE - especially the corporate competition - getting a heads up through government surveillance.
And to that end, our corporate-owned media hopes to enlist the help of freedom loving Americans under the guise of protecting our constitutional rights, when really, they're concerned about their economic privileges.
We're in a no win situation. If we fight the surveillance, the corporations backed by the media stand to gain, and if we don't fight it, the corporations backed by the government prevail.
Working Americans are caught in the middle, like a hapless and hopeless nationwide ping-pong ball - one way or another, we go where they want us to go.
We need dramatic change in America. What are you guys doing on the 4th of July?
The U.N. and guns.
By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
The Supreme Court and Guamtanamo Bay, Cuba
"Bush oversteps his authority" translated is Bush breaks the law - again.
Supreme Court Blocks Trials at Guantanamo
June 29, 2006
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees.
Iraq War Ends Silently for One American Soldier .
You won't read a more powerful story today.
Rich Man's War, Poor Man's Fight
U.S. losing war on terror, experts say
BOB HERBERT: The Wreckage in the China Shop
Former New York City Police Commissioner Described as Close to Deal on a Guilty Plea . Bush Pick for DHS Chief to Plead Guilty.
The U.S. "commitment" to Afghanistan
CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS
Myron Fagan Facts and Errors & Daryl Bradford Smith exposed some more.
is the link.
February 24, 2006
Jump to: navigation, search
February 24, 2006
Host: Daryl Bradford Smith
Guest: David Pidcock 
Here are today's lies, misstatements, disinformation, and stupidity:
(1) A bombing in Saudi Arabia was carried out by the Mossad. Any proof? Of course not.
(2) Daryl Bradford Smith claims that he isn't anti-Semitic: "Most of the people running Israel are not even Semites." This is an oldie but goodie, but in fact, anti-Semitism does mean "hatred of Jews." 
(3) Daryl Bradford Smith plugs judicial-inc , one of the worst sourced and deeply Jew-hating sites on the Internet. I have personally invited the heads of that site to debate me directly, and they refuse.
(4) Like a freaking lunatic, Daryl Bradford Smith is a moon landing denier. Sheesh!
(5) Jews are responsible for the Jacobins in Revolutionary France and the Cromwell rÃ©gime in England. There were no Jews in England before Cromwell took power. Edward I had deported them en masse in 1290.
Pidcock came on at this point.
(6) Pidcock stated David Irving didn't deny there were gas chambers; he denied that there were any in Auschwitz. Well that is Holocaust denial, considering that a full sixth of the Jewish Holocaust victims were gassed at Auschwitz.
(7) Pidcock said that Israel running the largest concentration camp in the West Bank and Gaza. To compare the treatment by the Nazis of Jews (which was genocide) with the immoral treatment by the Israeli government of the Palestinians is a shameless charge.
(8) Pidcock repeats the old lie that Jacob Schiff gave money to the Bolsheviks. He didn't. He gave money to the Provisional Government that took control of Russia in March 1917. He withdrew his support after the Bolshevik coup.
(9) Pidcock states that President Wilson insisted the Jews get Palestine. Wilson's Fourteen Points  do not mention Palestine at all.
(10) All of Daryl Bradford Smith and Pidcock's talk about the Lusitania and how its sinking led the U.S. to go to war against Germany ignores the Zimmermann Telegram. []
(11) Daryl Bradford Smith claims that reparations from Germany after WWI demanded by Zionists. In fact, they were demanded by the French and Belgians. After all, how would reparations to either country aid the Zionists? Wouldn't it make more sense to make a claim on behalf of Jews caught in the Eastern Front?
(12) Daryl Bradford Smith repeats his libel that the President is gay and is having sex with Jeff Gannon. Yet he is not a homophobe.
(13) Daryl Bradford Smith claims that Peter Sellers's career was ruined for his film production of the Jerzy Kosinski novel Being There. In fact, he received his second Oscar nomination for the film, which received broad critical acclaim.
(14) In answering a question about the Lubavitch, Pidcock claims that David Ben-Gurion came from Turkey? No, he was born in Plonsk, in Poland.
(15) Pidcock seems to believe than just because something was said in the U.S. Senate, that it is true.
My main impression with this interview is that Daryl Bradford Smith and Pidcock spend much time talking across each other, with Smith trying to link everything Pidcock said back to the Zionists, and Pidcock unwilling to do so. He may be an anti-Semite, but he's not stupid.
Pidcock, I mean. Daryl Bradford Smith is both.
March 21, 2006
Host: Daryl Bradford Smith
Guest: Sahib Mustaqim Bleher 
Here are today's lies, misstatements, disinformation, and stupidity:
(1) Today, interestingly, Daryl Bradford Smith mentions me as a "plant" of the Zionists because I send him e-mails that correct him when he lies.
(2) Daryl Bradford Smith says that a "strawman effect" is being produced by people wedding false information with real information. Surprise: Daryl Bradford Smith misuses a term. Here's what a straw man is described: 
(3) Daryl Bradford Smith constantly contradicts himself: On one hand, he constantly complains that his "information" does not get "traction," but in today's intro, he claims that he is getting "traction." Well, which is it, Daryl?
(4) Daryl Bradford Smith claims that "apartheid" in Israel is worse than it ever was in South Africa. I'm sorry: Could blacks in apartheid South Africa vote? No? Well, Arabs in Israel can and do. End of argument.
(5) Once again, Daryl Bradford Smith appeals his listeners to listen to the Benjamin Freedman speech. And then read this: 
(6) Daryl Bradford Smith attacks Madonna. What's up with that?
(7) And again, Daryl Bradford Smith says he isn't an anti-Semite. Pull the other one, Daryl; it has bells.
(8) Interestingly, Daryl Bradford Smith consistently points to Rabbi Dovid Weiss of the Neturey Karta as a likeminded individual, but at the same time, he spreads dangerous blood libels about the Talmud. Well, he should ask Rabbi Weiss about his view of the Talmud. R' Weiss is an Orthodox Jew; I'd bet a million dollars he's a Talmud scholar.
(9) Dr. Bleher talks about his association with David Musa Pidcock and his book Satanic Voices, a sample of which can be seen here:  They are presenting the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as if they are a valid text. They are not.
(10) Daryl Bradford Smith and Dr. Bleher discuss the burning of the Great Library of Alexandria. They ignore that the final destruction of the remaining books in the library after the Roman fire was ordered by Caliph Umar, one of the first successors to the Prophet Muhammad.
(11) Bleher mentions that Jews were allowed into the Netherlands because of their ability to lend money on interest. However, the Dutch Reformed Church is a Calvinist Church, and Calvinist Christianity does allow the lending of money on interest. So this explanation is obviously insufficient to answer why there existed in the Netherlands such a large Jewish community. The answer is that the Netherlands was a primary point of refuge for Jews after the Spanish Inquisition. However, Bleher has his facts wrong: These were Sephardic Jews in the Netherlands and not Ashkenazic Jews.
(12) Bleher makes another mistake, conflating the English Revolution of 1642 with the Glorious Revolution of 1689. Cromwell led the 1642 revolution; he was not involved in installing William of Orange as King of England, as he was already dead by over thirty years. Furthermore, the primary force behind deposing James II and replacing him with William and Mary were not Jews, but rather the Church of England, who worried that James II was too soft on Roman Catholicism. Nevertheless, Bleher links these Jews to the beginning of colonialism. I guess he never heard of Jamestown. Further, Queen Mary was a Stuart, i.e., she was Scottish.
(13) Bleher states that there is Judaism that follows the Torah and Judaism that follows the Talmud. This is technically true, but not to the degree he apparently thinks. Really, the distinction is that there are two types of observant Jews: Jews who accept the Oral tradition via the Talmud and those that don't. The latter group are called Karaites, and they are an infinitesimally small percentage of Jews. (Notably, in The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur Koestler points out that Crimean Karaites can be most directly tied to the Khazars.) The rest of observant Jewry has been affected by the Pharisaic Oral tradition.
(14) Bleher states that the Talmud "has nothing to do with the Torah." Actually, it has everything to do with the Torah. Perhaps Dr. Bleher should check the index of the readily available Soncino edition and see how often the Torah is cited in the Talmud.
(15) Bleher says that the Talmud is "more important than the Torah." Again, this is wrong. Here's a good explanation. A Torah scroll is very valuable and is treated with extreme care. You are not permitted to touch the parchment with anything but a silver pointer, and the punishment for dropping a Torah scroll is forty days of fasting. By contrast, if you drop the Talmud, you need only pick up the book and kiss it and then open it again.
(16) Daryl Bradford Smith says that there are "scary things in Deuteronomy," but he does not mention specifics.
(17) Daryl Bradford Smith plays the goyim card again now and this idiotic idea that the Talmud tells Jewish children that non-Jews are cattle.
(18) Daryl Bradford Smith again talks about the "Frankist New Bohemians" who allegedly set up the Masonic lodges. Remember: He claims this happened in the late eighteenth century, but Benjamin Franklin became a mason in 1713.
(19) Once again, we get the notion that "Jewish bankers" killed Lincoln and not John Wilkes Booth. I'm beginning to think that all these idiots simply read the same Web sites.
(20) Late in the interview, Daryl Bradford Smith brings up the David Irving trial. Smith makes the ridiculous claim that Irving is a tool of the "Zionist criminals." Bleher points out, correctly, that Irving had lost in Irving v. Lipstadt, but incorrectly states that he did not try to refute evidence entered by Deborah Lipstadt's legal team. This is patently untrue. See http://www.hdot.org/ Further, Bleher argues that "the Zionists" chose to bring Irving into court to embarrass "revisionism"; the record clearly shows that Irving was the initiating party in the case.
January 18, 2006
Host: Daryl Bradford Smith
Guest: Ted Pike
Here are today's lies, misstatements, disinformation, and stupidity:
(1) Today Daryl Bradford Smith labels the Zionists the "evil Hebrew Jewish leadership." I guess throwing "Hebrew" in there so we're sure about whom he speaks.
(2) Daryl Bradford Smith says that Zionism has never had majority support in the Jewish community. Is he kidding? There's a flag of Israel in every synagogue I've set foot in.
(3) Daryl Bradford Smith says that Israel is all desert. It's not. There is a significant desert in the South, but that's about it. The rest of the country is tropical and it rains frequently in Jerusalem.
(4) Daryl Bradford Smith talks about people that "are trying to establish the state of Israel." Is he not aware that the state was established in 1948?
(5) Yet again, Daryl Bradford Smith believes that Zionism is tied to Jewish conspiracies going as far back as the Spanish Inquisition if not further.
(6) Daryl Bradford Smith says that every Jew is supposed to have ten "Esau slaves" according to "the Torah's I've read." I wasn't aware that there was more than one Torah. That's because there is not.
(7) Ted Pike says that the Pharisees were the predominant sect of Jews when Jesus was alive. This is patently false. In fact, the Sadduccees, who rejected Oral Torah, were the ruling party in the Sanhedrin, and there were more sects of Jews in Judea in the first century AD than in any other time.
(8) Ted Pike says that Kabbalah was introduced into Judaism before Jesus came along. Yitzhak Luria didn't write the Zohar, the basis of Kabbalah, however, until the 13th century. Even the most Orthodox Jews do not believe the Zohar existed before the second century AD.
(9) Ted Pike says that the production and ownership of the film The Last Temptation of Christ was Jewish. The director was Martin Scorsese, who is an Italian Catholic (and former seminarian). It was adapted from the novel by Nikos Kazantzakis, who was a Greek Orthodox Christian. The adaptation was done by Paul Schrader, who may very well be Jewish. The producers were Barbara De Fina (Italian, probably Catholic) and Harry Ufland (maybe Jewish?). Here's the full cast and crew. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095497/fullcredits Ironically, the only Jew I see in the cast and crew who plays any kind of major role is Harvey Keitel, who plays, of all people, Judas Iscariot.
(10) Ted Pike says the Pharisees had Jesus crucified. Actually it was the Sadduccees who handed Jesus over to the Romans for crucifixion. The Pharisees would have carried out a death penalty themselves if they had wanted to, and it wouldn't have been crucifixion. Remember that the fundamental creed of Christianity, the Nicene Creed, says nothing about Jews killing Jesus; it says, "He was crucified by Pontius Pilate."
(11) Ted Pike concludes that the Jews who did not decide to follow Jesus decided instead to follow the Pharisees en masse. Rather, Pharisaism was the only form of Judaism left in large numbers after the Roman Destruction of Jerualem in 70 AD.
(12) "Mike" calls in to tell us not only that there was an "alleged Holocaust" and that David Irving is the "greatest historian" of World War II, but he tells us that Leon Trotsky's birth name was Levi Bronstein (it was Lev, not Levi, and the name "Lev" isn't a Jewish name), that Karl Marx's name was Mordechai Marx Levy, that Khrushchev's real name was Perlmutter, and that Mikhail Gorbachev's last name is Kahn. General Primakov, he says, is actually "Pincus Finkelsteain." I already covered Trotsky, who was Jewish. However, he didn't live a large portion of his life in New York. He lived there for about two months in 1917, after being deported from Frande. Marx was not born with the name Levy; his grandfather had the name "ha-Levi" added to his name because he was a Levite. Marx's father was born as Herschel Mordechai, but he changed the family name when he converted to Christianity, before Karl was born. Neither Khrushchev nor Gorbachev were Jewish and I defy anyone to provide evidence to the contrary. (By the way, it was Maxim Litvinov who was born with the last name Finkelstein; Primakov seems to have always been Primakov, and I don't know one way or the other if he is Jewish.)
Those in the New World Order
Scientology Exposed Yet Again.
Canadian Military Police Kidnap, Detain, Torture Bilderberg Investigators
Canadian Military Police Kidnap, Detain, Torture Bilderberg Investigators
Interrogators threatened to "cut off arms" during 6 hour marathon of hell
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com June 29 2006
Three Canadian citizens who visited the Brookestreet Hotel in Ottawa to observe members of the Bilderberg Group earlier this month were kidnapped, detained without charge and suffered the ordeal of a marathon interrogation session and psychological torture - including threats to "cut off the arms" of one of the victims.
The nightmare began on June 9th, the second day of the Bilderberg conference. After being warned to leave the previous day, Joe Burd's party of three left the site of the Brookestreet Hotel at 2pm where he and Crystal Slack headed for a local bar, while Burd's friend electrician Don McCormick rested in their rented vehicle which was parked on a downtown street.
What happened next should chill the core of anyone who thinks that westerners still live in a free society.
Joe Burd picks up the story.
"A military-grade task force involving local police, RCMP and members of the “Integrated National Security Enforcement Team” descended around the rental vehicle with weapons pointed at Mr. McCormick. He was abruptly and forcibly taken into custody from his vehicle, thrown to the ground and kicked in head."
After approaching the vehicle, Burd and his friend Crystal Slack were also grabbed and kidnapped, taken to a RCMP holding facility, detained without charges, harassed and interrogated for hours about their connections to the "insurgent" and "threat to national security" Alex Jones, who himself had been detained and interrogated for 15 hours at the hands of Canadian immigration the previous day.
They were the lucky ones.
McCormick was taken to a secret high security facility where he was brutally interrogated without charge and mentally tortured for six hours. He was accused of wanting to blow up the Brookestreet Hotel, as the interrogators threatened to "cut off his arms" warning him that they also "had his friends" in custody. This is the very definition of psychological torture, the threat of physical harm and dismemberment.
One of the dictionary definitions of torture is, "dismemberment, taking apart - the removal of limbs; being cut to pieces." The threat of extreme physical pain is a method used on suspected terrorists and was also inflicted upon innocent prisoners at Abu Ghraib.
McCormick's anguish at the hands of the Canadian Gestapo didn't end there.
Interrogators told McCormick that he “would never be alone again” and to “watch his back” - as he began to fear he would become the latest victim of the worldwide rendition policy, and be taken to an Eastern European gulag for further torture.
------Get Alex Jones' new movie TerrorStorm for just $5.95! -----------
McCormick was so stricken by the horror of his nightmare that many of the details of what happened remained bottled up, partly from threatened fear of reprisals if he told anyone what had occurred.
Finally being released and returning home the next day, McCormick became delirious and had to be rushed to hospital after he collapsed. He was diagnosed with severe dehydration and mental fatigue due to his experiences in Ottawa. McCormick had to be sedated to help him sleep as he babbled about having his arms cut off and interrogators threatening to harm his friends.
From the experiences of Alex Jones during his 15 hour ordeal with Canadian immigration officials, it was learned that the order to impede Jones' party came directly from the Bilderberg Group itself. With this knowledge in hand, it is by no means a stretch to assume that the hellish treatment of Burd, McCormick and Slack was also a mandate of the Bilderberg elitists.
These are the pleasures of the global elite and their security thug enforcers - repression of free speech, intimidation, kidnapping, grabbing people off the streets and treating them as terrorists, and psychological torture - all carried out under the wilful arrogance that they are protecting the nation from harm.
The real terrorists are the perverted bullies that kidnapped three peaceful citizens and subjected them to a marathon of hell - and they represent a threat to the freedom and way of life of all Canadians.
Click here to listen to an interview with Joe Burd.
Click here to listen to an interview with Don McCormick
*Note: Police car pictured at top of article was not involved in any of the incidents described in this piece.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
More about the S &B
The Skull and bones society is a satanic frat group dedicated to installing themselves in power. The Skull & Bones Society has been described as the most secretive organization in the world. The origin of the Skull & Bones in the U.S. begins at Yale when a group of men established an organization for the purpose of drug smuggling. Indeed, many American and European fortunes were built on the China (opium) trade. [The Secret Origins of Skull & Bones] It still exists today only at Yale and has evolved into more an organization dedicated to the success of it's members after leaving the collegiate world. The shape of that success can only be left to speculation. Some of the world's most famous and powerful men alive today are "bonesmen," including George Bush, John Kerry, Nicholas Brady, and William F. Buckley. Other bonesmen include Henry Luce (Time-Life), Harold Stanley (founder of Morgan Stanley), John Daniels (founder of Archer Daniels Midland), Henry P. Davison (senior partner Morgan Guaranty Trust), Pierre Jay (first chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York), Artemus Gates (President of New York Trust Company, Union Pacific, TIME, Boeing Company), Senator John Chaffe, Russell W. Davenport (editor Fortune Magazine), and many others.
All have taken a solemn vow of secrecy. Here is a link to membership of Yale's Skull and Bones society You'll see bush jr+snr http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/3/skullroster.htm
Videos on 9/11 and 7/7 bombings
The Bush War on Liberty Intensifies
Jesuit related videos
Who Infiltrated America? Jesuits? Zionists? Illuminati? NWO? Aliens? America has been the targets of the Jesuits and Popes since 1776. With help of France who had banished the Jesuits from their country at ... all » that time, America fought for it's freedom against King George III and won. Thus the declaration of independence was established and then followed the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Monroe Doctrine to protect us from Jesuit infiltration and destruction of our Republic. But slowly the infiltrating Jesuits have come in and have now brought America under the control of the dictator in Rome (The White Pope who is under the control of the Black Pope and his jesuit army)
DOWNLOADABLE VIDEO FORMATS
Vatican Assassins by Eric Jon Phelps at ConCon2002
DOWNLOADABLE VIDEO FORMATS
The High Price of American Gullibility by Paul Craig Roberts
ACLU objects as two companies offer 'mind reading' technology to government
ACLU objects as two companies offer 'mind reading' technology to government
RAW STORYPublished: Wednesday June 28, 2006
Print This Email This
The American Civil Liberties Union today announced that it has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the primary American security agencies for information relating to the use of "cutting-edge brain-scanning technologies" on suspected terrorists, RAW STORY has learned.
Two private companies have announced that they will begin to offer "lie detection" services using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), as early as this summer. fMRI can produce live, real-time images of people's brains as they answer questions, view images, listen to sounds, and respond to other stimuli.
These companies are marketing their services to federal government agencies, including the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, the National Security Agency and the CIA, and to state and local police departments.
"There are certain things that have such powerful implications for our society -- and for humanity at large -- that we have a right to know how they are being used so that we can grapple with them as a democratic society," said Barry Steinhardt, Director of the ACLU's Technology and Liberty Project.
Equally worrisome to the group is the fact that experts in the field have told the ACLU that the science to back up any reliable use of fMRI as a "lie detector" or "mind reader" simply does not exist. At most, correlations have been observed between certain brain patterns and particular, highly controlled behaviors produced in laboratory experiments.
Experts also note that these early experiments on a few American college students are a long way from real-world settings, involving individuals in widely varying situations and with widely varying cultures, intelligence levels and states of mind.
"This technology must not be deployed until it is proven effective -- and we are a long way away from that point, according to scientists in the field," said Steinhardt. "What we don't want is to open our newspapers and find that another innocent person has been thrown into Guantánamo because interrogators have jumped to conclusions based on a technology no one understands very well."