February Highlights

 

 

The CPAC meeting featured many speakers like John McCain, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and others. John McCain tried to appeal to conseratives to earn their vote despite the controversy of his viewpoints on certain issues. McCain was showered with praise and booes from the crowd. Some commentators like Chris Matthews from MSNBC and Roland Martin from CNN wants conservatives to suck it up and just support them. Would these 2 do the same if they wanted a Democrat who disagreed greatly with their views? Anyway, people have a right to not suck it up. Brave folks have a determined right also to vote or not to vote for a candidate. John McCain isn't the conservative as the media protray him as. He's a friend of liberal Joseph Liberman, he's anti-gun, he voted for McCain Feingold (which even the Supreme Court cited its anti-First Amendment provisions in it), and he promotes an interventionalist foreign policy (desiring to fight in Iraq as long as 100 years). He funded by many of the same multinational corporations as Hillary and Obama are. John McCain's wife wore the Phoenix pin that Hillary Clinton wore. This link presents the real meaning of the Phoenix. I'm annoyed with the media sucking up to McCain and demonizing those that disagree with him. It's funny how Matthews and others like Jennifer Donahue can't stand free speech that dissents with McCain's policies, but love free speech when it dissents with the Iraq War. It's really hypocrispy. Capitulation and compromise didn't benefit any President whether they are Democrat or Republican. Ron Paul and Mitt Romney spoke there as well. Ron Paul spoke on the weakening dollar, civil liberties, and other subjects. Ron Paul is visiting Lynchburg, Virginia where the mountains are located in Virginia. Presently, Barack Obama has slightly more delegates than Hillary Clinton does. Barack Obama opened an office in Norfolk, Virginia. Afre Woodward, a famous celebrity, was there also to support Obama. Hillary is counting on Northern Virginia (which is more of an establishment Democratic region), while Obama is counting on Southern Virginia where I live at. State primaries for the Democrats are coming up in Texas, Louisiana, etc. This close Democratic primary will persist for some time. Some speculate that each person will be on a ticket together. The reason is that Obama possess an intense amount of popularity among many voters. I didn't know that Obama had a Bonesman and the founder of the Trilateral Commission as crucial advisers until recently. Hillary Clinton is even more establishment figure. The reason is that her husband is a Rhodes Scholar, Demolay, and he's Jesuit trained from Georgetown University (not to mention that Bill Clinton has CIA ties. He's the man involved in the Waco genocide, Serbian wars, Iraqi bombing, NAFTA passing, etc). There are those who want us to support Hillary or Obama as a viable alternative to Republicans. Frankily, I don't agree with supporting totally any major candidate. It's vastly more effective to handle business in your own community and area via independent iniatatives than obsessing with candidates. Rush Limbaugh sold out once again. Now, he talking about prefering a possibility to fund Hillary Clinton than John McCain. Limbaugh is a Neo-Con who doesn't talk about real conservative issues once again like the North American integration agenda, being anti-Big Brother, or about how abortion & population control are key agendas of global internationalists (who want to deindustralize plus non-modernize in an extreme level the Third World in order to crush population growth. They also want to exploit and control the resources in the Third World. That was the purpose of imperalism and mercantalism by European powers that still is occuring today). Roger Ailes help fund Rush Limbaugh for many years. Ailes' friend Rupert Murdoch funds the Hillary Clinton campaign. See the connection of colloboration that exposes the pseudo-political agitation among both major parties. As for the abortion, if you really want liberty to for all, you have to protect the liberty of the unborn and all human beings in every stage of life. Our liberty means additionally that we should have a Fourth Amendment (although, the USA Patriot Act and the NSA warantless wiretaps totally violate that Amendment). It's intesting that Bush is proposing for the first time a $3.1 trillion budget. Ending the war in Iraq can easily cut down massively the amount of money spent inside the federal government. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com from February 7, 2008 reported that pro-abortion groups wanting to challenge the Weldon law. This laws don't allow federal money if hospital discriminates against doctors who refuse to participate in abortion. This is disgusing for the pro-abortion crowd to do it since they want to eliminate folks' right to have a conscience and a right to disagree peaceful on an issue. Not to mention that the Weldon law protects the right of religious freedom. Many hypocrites lecture on toleance but have intolerance of pro-life people and their right to refuse to do an abortion. James Sweeney, an attorney for the Christian Medical Association, which won the right to intervene in the lawsuit on behalf of pro-life doctors and medical staff. Mark Glenn from the American Free Press on February 4, 2008 reported on Russia. I strongly disagree with Glenn's anti-Jewish rhetoric (he to this day refuses to expose the Vatican/Jesuit connection to the new world order plus its global power. He ignores real Muslim radical terrorism in Sudan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and other nations where Christians and non-Muslims are oppressed plus murdered. Back decades ago, Muslim radicals worked with the Nazis to kill Jewish people, Serbs, and others during WWII. That's documentated). Not all Muslims are terrorists. I want to make that clear, so I don't agree with paranoia neither with killing Muslims. Yet, Glen is right on writing about Russia. Russia's military chief of staff General Yuri Baluyevsky  threatened a nuclear response against nations posing a threat against them. Russia and NATO has been competing against each other for the political and military hegemony of Europe (especially in Eastern Europe). Stern threats like this are made in a time when neo-cons want an invasion of Iran if necessary. Iran poses no direct threat to America or Israel (Isreal has a right to its sovereignity and every other Middle Eastern nation. Israel is fully capable of self-defense without our assistance. Many Middle Eastern nations were created by European nations via the Sykes-Picot Agreement from 1916). Russia isn't a saint in this affair. Putin has regularly in his own nation suppress free speech rights, jailed journalists, and mysterious opposition leader died in his watch. Now, the big picture is that the neo-conservative philosophy of military aggression that unwarranted along with preemptive warfare ought to be thoroughly rejected as a debased and degenerate foreign policy to adhere to.

John McCain is visting Norfolk, VA today in a roundtable like setting. He's meeting with John Warner to make manifest a discussion about foreign policy issue. McCain is trying to win Virginia for Primary delegating since Virginia is a prominent military state. Also, he's uniting with Warner being one of his friends and both are military veterans. Sergeant Ted Sampley of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth group  bascially wants to counterreact the campaign of John McCain. He believes that McCain told secrets to the North Vietnamese while he was captured by them. It's true and a historical fact that McCain along with his allies block a real completion in the investigation of missing POWs in Vietnam. That's one of the reasons why certain military, independent organizations express so much opposition to John McCain. Also, he subscribes to the view that John McCain is more of a liberal Republican rather than an authentic conservative. As for me, I'm an Independent. I believe more and more 3-parties should have a higher position of power.  There is a Pro-English movement in America. What do I think of it? I believe in free speech, so a person has the First Amendment right to speak in what ever language they want in public and especially in private. Yet, I do subscribe in one national language (we don't have an offical one in America) for the stability and unity of America. A national language doesn't mean it's the only language spoken, but it's the primary language utilized for business, transport, and the conduct of society. K.C. McAlpin, a spokesman for ProEnglish, a Virginia-based group that is trying to preserve English as the common language of the United States, and Ashleigh Allison want English to be the common language of America. Of course, if English is to be the common language of America, it has to be passed by Congress. Of course, there are exceptions to accomodate those who have trouble speaking English, so I do believe in some compassion. Let's not kid ourselves. We should have our national sovereignity and perserve our national cultural heritage though. On other issues, we should find solutions to the Drug War, improving our health, finding ways to promote health freedom, and wanting to improve the environment. Instead of promoting global warming hysteria (when over 100 scientists disagree with the IPCC report and the solar system is warming without any intervention by mankind), we should find out about real environmental issue (like aspartame, the rainforest, GM foods, the ecosystem, conservation, flouride, toxic waste, etc.). Some media whistleblowers exposed how Monsanto promoted blatant growth hormone poisons in their products (This hormones had human health problems). The media officals were sent a letter from Monsanto in trying to intimidate the media whistleblowers. Monsanto threatened FOX News stations with a repeal of their sponsors since Papal Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch owns many stations in America. He's the Chairman of News Corporation. Another Knight of St. Gregory member was John J. Raskob (a famous banker and a famous Knight of Malta). Veit Dinh is another architect of the USA Patriot Act plus he's Jesuit trained from Georgetown University. Dinh and Rod Paige (a member of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, INc. Paige is a Bush ally. He sat next to Bush in Sarasota, Florida when Bush was told about 9/11) are members of the Board of Directors of News Corporation as well. Thomas Richards found and written that information out, so I want to give credit to him. The media whistleblowers said that FOX executives threatened to fire them if they want to report on the story. Matthew Rothschild from The Progressive at February 7, 2008  reported on InfraGrad. This is the first time of me hearing of this organization. InfraGrad is about 23,000 representatives of private industry working quietly with the FBI and the DHS (or the Department of Homeland Security). InfraGrad recieved terrorist threats before the public or even public officals do. They provide information to the government. The ACLU opposes this group, beacuse this group may be another spy organ of the federal government via corporations like the TIPS program. There is nothing wrong with legit corporations as long as they play by the rules and don't get involved in anti-liberty activites. Corporations shouldn't control all laws and the government. The people and individuals ought to control the government and create the laws. This group has been involved in emergency drills (Curt Haugen is CEO of S'Curo Group admitted to this. Haugen himself is a InfraGrad member). One InfraGrad member told Rothschild that he has a right to shoot to kill in case of emergencies. That's strange, but this is the mentality of many anti-liberty, pro-police states members of government (not all people in government). Random searches, excessive surveillance, and militarized police are common place in many large cities of America. It's even worse in the United Kingdom. Simon Jenkins from Wednesday on February 6, 2008 had an article mentioned by The Guardian. Jenkins documents the police state action in the UK. For example, Jenkins wrote that some British officals  private dealings between lawyer and client, and between MP and constituent, should no longer be considered immune from state surveillance.  The monitoring organisation Privacy International cites Great Britian as having the worse record in Europe in terms of protecting privacy. Even Liberals in Britian want oversight, but oversight masks the issue. The real solution is the curtailing of these surveillance obstruction of our rights and a return to principles of warrants, laws, and other legitimate situations. Secret Societies have still strong influence in the world, not powerful than God's influence though. As for February and Black History, I respect black history. I just wish black history took a high emphasis 365 days a year not just a single month. Black people should never be intimidated by anyone since black people always had a rich history with strong leaders from Frederick Douglas to Sojouner Truth, and Harriet Tubman. Many leaders exist today and this is part of American history not only black history.

By Timothy