Escaping Bitterness

There has been controversy over Barack Obama's comments again. Obama said that the job loss in the small towns in Pennsylvania propelled some residents to act in a certain way. Obama said that they cling to guns and religion, they use anti-immigrant sentiment, and they utilize anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations. What is the truth? The truth is that many rural and urban Americans are racist, possess nefarious hatred against human beings, or are prejudice against human beings of many backgrounds or orientations. That isn't the controversy here. The controversy is when he seems to say that this sentiment is a true representation of small towns in Pennslyvania and the Midwest (and that people cling to religion, anti-immigrant sentiments, anti-trade sentiments, and guns as a crutch to express their bitterness. Also, he said that this leads people to dislike people that are different from them). That isn't the case. The majority of People in Middle America don't cling on religion as some crutch to justify their bitterness. Religion used the right way can be a means to cope and end bitterness over the harsh realities of life. Guns aren't utilized for clutching unto paranoia or hatred. Guns are utilized by many Americans for collection, history lessons, sport, hunting, self defense, and a wide array of reasons. That's why I'm opposed to the Oakland pilot program having warrantless searches in the homes of citizens to steal guns. Gun rights is part of a legitimate heritage that built this nation. Most sane Americans aren't anti-trade (trade or commerce is explicity mentioned and promoted in the Constitution). We just object with unfair, anti-national sovereignity trade deals like NAFTA, CAFTA, and GATT. There is even a NAFTA Superhigway being proposed in America. The Trans-Texas Corridor exists also which is protested by numerous patriotic Texans (for using eminent domain as a tactic to steal private property. Rick Perry wants this so the construction of the TTC is possible. Also, a Spainish foreign company named Cintra is trying own land in Texas to build the highway. Knight of Malta Spanish royal Juan Carlos owns Cintra). Additionally, most Americans don't oppose immigration that's legal. The vast majority of Americans oppose illegal immigration. There's a difference. These comments do seem condescending and stereotypical. Obama spoke these words to donors in San Francisco. Hillary and McCain of course criticized Obama for these statements. To be fair, Obama said he should of worded his prior comments in another way. Obama wanted to say that the economic struggles in America indued bitterness among those across the America including those residing in Middle America (That is true obviously). Obama is right that tax breaks should be giving unto corporations that stay here, that we should invest in our communities, and that the Iraq War should have never existed in the first place. Yet, Barack Obama is a heavy supporter of gun control, and he agrees in the most extreme types of abortion (like partial birth abortion. He refuses to support a bill that prevents aborting a baby that had survived an abortion. That baby is outside of the mother's womb). Barack Obama contemplates fighting Pakistan (if actionable "intelligence" somehow deciphers the precise location of Osama bin Laden as being in Pakistan). The good news of this is that it gives us an oppurtunity to speak the truth, to express ourselves, and defend the real values that improved American society. Although, McCain and Hillary aren't innocent in this affair. Hillary regularly speaks polarization. John McCain made a incorrect statement that the economic crisis in America is more psychological than authentically real. McCain claimed that peaceful dissent with Freemasonry was intolerance, which isn't true. Hillary's health care plan is a government take over of our health care services. In other words, in her plan, even children are required to let the government run their health (even if you choose not to). If you refuse to allow that, families could face fines (she even considered stealing wages to fund her aims). Hillary wants a $4 billion plan anti-gun crime plan sending more police in the streets when thousands of police are already in the streets. You've got thousands of gun control laws in the books right now. Hillary Clinton is notoriously anti-gun. Yet when she was speaking in rural Pennslyvania crowds, she exhorted a love for gun rights. Hillary is obviously more elitist than Barack is. Hillary and Bill are worth at least $100 million dollars, she once supported NAFTA. NAFTA negatively decreased our manufacturing base. A manufacturing base in any nation equates a potent economy. The economic crisis has come about via many factors like the banks promoting too much credit cards to citizens, subprime mortgages being sold, and the existence of fiat currency (i.e. money that isn't of much value. This fiat money is just printed out like paper. In colonial times, the dollar was backed up by metals like silver or gold. This fiat currency today have made inflation higher). Now, the FED is proposing to control all of the economic system in America instead of making effective, independent solutions. One solution is to do all you can to get our debt. You can put some of your assets into commodities that you need like silver, etc. Her husband Bill supported NATO's bombings of Serbian civilian infrastructure (in the late 1990's). Papal Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch (probably the most powerful media mogul in the world right now) funds not only George W. Bush, but Hillary Clinton. Hillary never rejects Murdoch's cash to her campaign. That should tell you something. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton came into a Harrisburg, PA (in Messiah College) faith forum. Each seperately discussed their faith and how religion is a key factor in the lives of many Americans. Religion can be a inspiring factor in many movements spanning thousands of years like the abolitionist movement and even the civil rights movement. ERIC BERGER from the Houston Chronicle on Saturday, at April 12, 2008 outline on how one of the most influential experts is changing his views on the global warming/hurricane connection. This expert is named Kerry Emanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Global warming proponents usually view that a warming world is permanent (if nothing is done by man). The result of this warming increases the intensity of hurricanes in their minds. Kerry Emanuel believes that hurricane frequency and intensity may not substantially rise during the next two centuries. Hurricanes can go up and down in power thoughout seasons.

Reverend Jeremiah Wright came to Norfolk, Virginia to preach. That was strange since he lives in Illinois and he traveled all the way to where I'm from in Norfolk, VA to preach a sermon. He preached it at Bank Street Memorial Baptist Church at 7036 Chesapeake Blvd. He came to Norfolk, because a relative of Wright was a former preacher at the church. Wright blamed the founding fathers for slavery and white supremacy. He also attacked FOX News (I admit that FOX promotes neo-con ideology and that is wrong. Also, they are the most pro-Papal network in U.S. TV. I've seen commercials where they praise Pope Benedict XVI and the Knights of Columbus. Yesterday, Chris Wallace narrated a praise worthy documentary about Pope Benedict XVI. Pope Benedict called for a new world order) for covering his sermons and not comprehending his messages. Regardless of his sermons, any media place has a right to show them if they want to. As for the Founding Fathers, they weren't perfect. Yet, many of them opposed slavery and racism against black people in the colonial days like John Jay. To omit that is just as much a lie as to ignore many founding fathers' errors. Jeremiah Wright gave an eulogy for a late congregant of Trinity United Church of Christ. He was the former appellate judge and his name was R. Eugene Pincham. The Trinity United Church of Christ believes that if you're not baptized before death, you're going Hell (i.e. baptism is required for salvation). I don't believe in that at all. Although, I still believe in God. I still believe that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Messiah. In America, religious expression is more vibrant so to speak as compared to other Western countries. There is nothing wrong with that. God-fearing human beings shouldn't feel ashame of their belief system. So, Wright is speaking a lot of half-truths here. Wright additionally criticized Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity for not understanding his concepts and refusing to love all humans in all nations. Bishop E.W. Jackson Sr., is preaching a counter sermon against Wright discussing patriotism and war issues. What's the truth? Wright is right on many issues and wrong on others. I believe the Wright issue is being used by the mainstream media in other to obfuscate the real issues in America. The real issues are how the government tested poisons including dangerous biological weapons against citizens (like the Tuskegee Experiments back in the early 20th century), how the ex-DEA agent admitted that the government gave cocaine into America, and how the new world order is a real threat for the world.




Heather May from The Salt Lake Tribune wrote an Article ,which was Last Updated on 04/11/2008. It described an issue in Utah. Doctors who are pro-life are having issues with some new guidelines. These guidelines are trying to force them to perform abortions or refer patients to doctors who do abortion (even if they disagree with this or or else risk losing certification through a separate organization). A recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ethics opinion wanted this injustice to occur. Utah's former governor and now the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt expressed their concerns against American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' ethics opinion as well. State and federal laws protect physcians to not do abortions if their religious or moral consciences make them oppose such a procedure. That should exist because all human beings have a right to believe in what they want. All individuals possess a right to follow the dictates of their own conscience. Obviously Planned Parenthood wants doctors to violate their religious code in doing such evil acts. Spencer S. Hsu from the Washington Post on April 13, 2008 mentioned an article on a new spy program promoted by the United States government. The Bush administration mentioned that they plan to start using the nation's most advanced spy technology. Michael Chertoff (who is the Homeland Security Secretary) said that the DHS is going use new domestic satellite surveillance offices. They will create stages for it in tracking hurricane damage, climate change, and creating terrain maps. Also, There is sophisticated overhead sensor data used for law enforcement. The department’s new National Applications Office is apart of this agenda. Some Democrats oppose such measures because of privacy concerns. Some Democrats believe Chertoff didn't spell out what federal laws govern the NAO (since it's findings are classified). The NSA's domestic spying program was blatantly unConstitutional, because the NSA instituted warrantless eavesdroppings on calls and emails between people in the United and overseas. The NSA monitored emails in America alone for decades via programs such as Echeleon.

A Supreme Court decision came up. It occured in March 28, 2008. The Court stated in Medellin v. Texas that while an international treaty may exist as a international commitment. Yet, it is not binding domestic law unless Congress has enacted statues implementing it or an act of Congress approves it. The case revolves around Jose Ernesto Medellin and other members of a vicious Houston street gang. Medellin and the street gang raped and killed young grils (named Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena). The Vienna Convention say that the police have to notify Mexico of his arrest since Medellin was a national of Mexico. He was tried and convicted in Texas. Jose Ernesto Medellin made an admission of guilt. The police in Texas didn't notify Mexico, yet this treaty should have no role in dictating the American judicial system. If a crime occurs in Texas or any nation, that nation has a right to fulfill their judicial laws up and beyond international law. That is why I oppose Chinese paramilitary forces patrolling streets and assaulting American and British citizens in San Francisco and other cities. Domestic laws enforced in a nation always should have precedent above international law. The LOST Treaty is another example of another anti-national sovereignity proposal. Nita Farahany from the Washington Post at Sunday, on April 13, 2008 reported on something odd. Nita wrote that the government is trying to wrap its mind around ours. That means that America isn't just a place with cameras everywhere monitoring streets. The government is beginning to develop devices to figure out brain activity, which can potentinally read minds plus thoughts. That similar to such science fiction movies like Minority Report back in 2002. Such a technology was a project funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency which is called Perceptrak. Perceptrak was installed by John Hopkins University and others to use algorithms to anaylze videos in order to detect suspicious activites (like people loitering, etc.). Nanotechnology can be a big tool in monitoring brain activity even from a distance like a person being nervous. Already, scientists in the University of Sussex, England can use technology to detect heart rate 1 meter away. The University of Sussex additionally can detect changes in the brains. Why would the government promote neural detection technology other than the means to control or monitor human beings? This leads into the control of populations. Many global leaders like Prince Philip, Ted Turner, and others want population control of human society. Their own quote signify eugenics. Eugenics didn't just exist from Malthus back in the 1800's. Ancient Greece (i.e. Plato wrote literature in wanting classes of people like the elite running the lives of the rest of the masses) supported eugenics by killing babies and other humans with so-called "blemishes." After World War Two, thousands of Nazi criminals were sent around the world even in America to become scientists, researchers, etc (via Operation Paperclip, etc. What's strange was that that Hitler ordered the torch rally back in 1936 to light the flame at Olympic Stadium. Also, the Nazis popularized the five interlocking rings as the symbol of the Games). Some of the Nazis lead leading field of analysis and research. Why? It's to use their intellect in other to build up the present world system that we have today full of flouridation, the elite control of society in a mechanical way, and the exploitation plus disingetration of societal norms. The Keith Harmon Snow from Global Research on Monday, at April 14, 2008 described about the Rwanda Genocide. The truth is that both the Tutsis and the Hutus committed unjustified atrocities against each other. Keith Harmon wrote that faux Rwandian "refugees" are infiltrating America and the UK as undercover agents to get real refugees and critics of the present Rwandan government. Later, the critics and real refugees are dragged back to Rwanda. It's definitely true that the Rwandan Patriotic Front/Army (or the RPF) contributed to the murder of both Tutsis and Hutsis. One instigator of this was the evil Major General Paul Kagame who invaded Rwanda in October of 1990. The assassination of Juvenal Habyarimana and Cyprien Ntaryamira in a plane crash was another contributing factor to the Rwanda genocide. It started in a high level at 1994. Even a Spanish court in February 6, 2008 indicted 40 top military officials in the Rwandan regime. The Pentagon in late 2007 extended the Kagame government a military training package worth $7-12 million. Daryl Ebehart wrote also that many Roman Catholic agents in Rwanda inspired or even encouraged the Hutu militants to kill Tutsis (once it was more vice versa). For example, Wenceslas, a priest in Rwanda was charged in France in 1998 with ‘providing Hutu killers with lists of Tutsi refugees at his church. He's also charged with flushing refugees out of hiding to be killed, and attending massacres without interfering. Wenceslas was charged with sabotaging UNAMIR’s efforts to evacuate refugees from the church’, and much more. This isn't collective blaming on all Catholics, but the leadership of many Catholics and many Protestants have been league with the new world order. Even Concentration camp plans are for real. Rex 84 was created in the 1980's in order for get immigrants into camps in case of an emergency. The Civilian Inmate Labor Program was created for having labor programs and prison camps on Army installations. In January 2006, Kellogg, Brown and Root reported that they had received a contract from the Department of Homeland Security to build up concentration camps in case of "emergencies." I've never been a one issue man. I realize that taking a stand on numerous issues not only builds up your intelligence, but widens your worldview in general. That's why I'm pro-life, pro-gun rights, I'm against the genocide in Darfur, and I believe in a clean environment (but I won't accept global warming hysteria like promoting poisonous mercury filled Compact fluorescent light bulbs. Mercury is a neuro-toxic poison. I believe the climate changes all of the time. I don't believe that man is the sole factor in the changes of climate. Natural forces like the sun, volcanoes, etc. are the major indicators in the changes of climate. Sodium flouride is another poison that can decrease IQ rates in human beings). Real environmental issues are about GM foods, animal/human hybrids, toxic waste dumpings, and deforestation. I agree with utilizing organic foods, I respect civil liberties (as proclaimed in the Bill of Rights), and I always oppose torture. The world works as a battle between good and evil. Throughout human history, elites (especially in the form of empires like Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Today, the leading globalists are the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, the British Royals, the Black Nobility, the leaders of the Vatican/Jesuits, the City of London, the Bilderbergers, the Pilgrim Society, etc. They head the big international banks) have tried to control society into a feudal control grid. A pyramid is an easy example of the elite power structure. The pyramid analogy of power is defined as where power is compartmentalized. In other words, lower levels of the pyramid are ignorant of who's in charge (i.e. Those in the capstone or the top of the pyramid). It's our responsibility to educate ourselves about the new world order system. Then, we should educate others and help people. Examples including encouraging communities to promote a place where our civil liberties are protected, we should constantly understand a wide away of subject matter, promote individual liberty, write, and speak out. Letting your voice to be heard is a crucial means in getting something achieved. One thing is for sure. If you do nothing, nothing is going to happen. If you do something, something positive can be accomphlished. Therefore, We should be active. I will escape bitterness. I will be bitter about nothing in my life. As long as you're living, we have a right and a responsibility to do anything legitimate to make our and other lives better.



By Timothy