Thursday, July 31, 2008
Abortion Decline in US Leads to Long-Term Reduction in Infant Mortality Rates
From http://lifenews.com/nat4087.html
Abortion Decline in US Leads to Long-Term Reduction in Infant Mortality Rates
RSS Newsfeed Email article Printer friendly
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
July 31, 2008
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Americans received good news back in January when new figures from Planned Parenthood's research group showed the number of abortions nationwide have fallen to their lowest point in 30 years and have declined 25 percent since 1990. That has resulted in a drop in the nation's infant mortality rate.
The Alan Guttmacher Institute report found just over 1.2 million abortions in the United States in 2005, down nearly 25% from their high of 1.6 million in 1990.
The last time the number of abortions was that low was 1976 -- just three years after Roe v. Wade. The abortion rate (the number of abortions per 1,000 women age 15-44) came in at 19.4 per thousand in 2005 -- the lowest since 1974.
Those declining numbers have had an effect on the infant mortality rate, according to new figures from the Centers for Disease Control, in part because abortion causes an increase in the risk of premature birth in future pregnancies.
New CDC figures show the infant mortality rate at 6.86 per 1,000 live births -- a drop compared to the 6.89 rate in 2000 and the 7.57 rate in 1995.
Not surprisingly, infant mortality rates are higher in ethnic groups that have more abortions and lower in groups that have fewer.
The CDC noted, "Infant mortality rates ranged from 4.89 deaths per 1,000 live births for Asian or Pacific Islander (API) mothers to 13.63 for non-Hispanic black mothers."In addition, the CDC said, "The preterm-related infant mortality rate for non-Hispanic black mothers was 3.4 times higher" than for other ethnic groups.
Black women have more abortions compared to their white counterparts, which accounts for the figures.
As Day Gardner, the head of the National Black Pro-Life Union has noted, African-American women are 4.8 times more likely to have an abortion than a white woman.
Abortion's link to premature birth helps explain these figures and premature birth often leads to higher infant mortality.It also shows the long-term consequence of abortion as the CDC noted, "The percentage of infant deaths that were '‘preterm-related' increased from 34.6 percent in 2000 to 36.5 percent in 2005."
A French study in May 2005 showed an induced abortion can increase the risk by premature birth in subsequent pregnancies by as much as 70 percent.
That's because the abortions can damage the lining of the uterus, where unborn children grow and develop.
The study was based on medical notes and interviews of 2837 French women who had a premature birth during 1997, which represents about one-third of the total number of premature births that year.
Those who gave birth between 28 and 32 weeks of pregnancy were 40 percent more likely to have had an abortion compared with mothers who gave birth within two weeks of the expected due date.
Mothers who gave birth to babies from 22 to 27 weeks into the pregnancy were 70 percent more likely to have had an abortion.
Premature births also have issues as far as breast cancer is concerned -- another abortion link.
Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, a New Jersey based breast cancer expert, says, "The basic biological changes that occur during pregnancy account for the increase in breast cancer risk for both induced abortion and premature delivery shown in the preponderance of studies."
In fact, Lanfranchi indicated that late-term abortions are particularly damaging to women.
"Until maturation is well underway after 32 weeks gestation, the longer a woman is pregnant before premature delivery or induced abortion, the higher her risk of breast cancer because her breasts have greater numbers of lobules where breast cancers start," she notes.
Abortion Decline in US Leads to Long-Term Reduction in Infant Mortality Rates
RSS Newsfeed Email article Printer friendly
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
July 31, 2008
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Americans received good news back in January when new figures from Planned Parenthood's research group showed the number of abortions nationwide have fallen to their lowest point in 30 years and have declined 25 percent since 1990. That has resulted in a drop in the nation's infant mortality rate.
The Alan Guttmacher Institute report found just over 1.2 million abortions in the United States in 2005, down nearly 25% from their high of 1.6 million in 1990.
The last time the number of abortions was that low was 1976 -- just three years after Roe v. Wade. The abortion rate (the number of abortions per 1,000 women age 15-44) came in at 19.4 per thousand in 2005 -- the lowest since 1974.
Those declining numbers have had an effect on the infant mortality rate, according to new figures from the Centers for Disease Control, in part because abortion causes an increase in the risk of premature birth in future pregnancies.
New CDC figures show the infant mortality rate at 6.86 per 1,000 live births -- a drop compared to the 6.89 rate in 2000 and the 7.57 rate in 1995.
Not surprisingly, infant mortality rates are higher in ethnic groups that have more abortions and lower in groups that have fewer.
The CDC noted, "Infant mortality rates ranged from 4.89 deaths per 1,000 live births for Asian or Pacific Islander (API) mothers to 13.63 for non-Hispanic black mothers."In addition, the CDC said, "The preterm-related infant mortality rate for non-Hispanic black mothers was 3.4 times higher" than for other ethnic groups.
Black women have more abortions compared to their white counterparts, which accounts for the figures.
As Day Gardner, the head of the National Black Pro-Life Union has noted, African-American women are 4.8 times more likely to have an abortion than a white woman.
Abortion's link to premature birth helps explain these figures and premature birth often leads to higher infant mortality.It also shows the long-term consequence of abortion as the CDC noted, "The percentage of infant deaths that were '‘preterm-related' increased from 34.6 percent in 2000 to 36.5 percent in 2005."
A French study in May 2005 showed an induced abortion can increase the risk by premature birth in subsequent pregnancies by as much as 70 percent.
That's because the abortions can damage the lining of the uterus, where unborn children grow and develop.
The study was based on medical notes and interviews of 2837 French women who had a premature birth during 1997, which represents about one-third of the total number of premature births that year.
Those who gave birth between 28 and 32 weeks of pregnancy were 40 percent more likely to have had an abortion compared with mothers who gave birth within two weeks of the expected due date.
Mothers who gave birth to babies from 22 to 27 weeks into the pregnancy were 70 percent more likely to have had an abortion.
Premature births also have issues as far as breast cancer is concerned -- another abortion link.
Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, a New Jersey based breast cancer expert, says, "The basic biological changes that occur during pregnancy account for the increase in breast cancer risk for both induced abortion and premature delivery shown in the preponderance of studies."
In fact, Lanfranchi indicated that late-term abortions are particularly damaging to women.
"Until maturation is well underway after 32 weeks gestation, the longer a woman is pregnant before premature delivery or induced abortion, the higher her risk of breast cancer because her breasts have greater numbers of lobules where breast cancers start," she notes.
Webster Tarpley
QUOTE
Hello, Eric:
I have read some of your writings and find the data worth looking into further.
I thought you might find this interesting:
In his book 911 Synthetic Terror Webster Griffin Tarpley writes that the Guy Fawkes Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was a "false flag" operation (Pg. 68-70) planned by Lord Robert Cecil and the British government because "it was politically vital to keep persecuting the Roman Catholics." He gets this information from the "Jesuit Gerard".
It is appalling that Tarpley expects the world to forget the Catholic Inquisition , and the years of Bloody Mary burning Protestants in England just prior to Elizabeth's reign, and that the Jesuits were founded for the purpose of destroying Protestant Christianity (and Protestant governments).
What gutsy nerve to suggest that the (harmless) Jesuits would not try to
overthrow Queen Elizabeth's government! This gross distortion of history casts severe doubt on everything he writes. Why, then, have so many nations expelled the Jesuits if they do not engage in such subterfuge?
Many people writing on these topics appear to be Jesuits themselves, and perhaps the 'La Rouches' that Tarpley is linked to as well. There are no fingers pointing to possible intrigues of Rome at all in his writings.
He gives a talk on this on YouTube also:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=U73jn5OvZDY&feature=related
It is a shameless distortion of history, but even if it were true, the English had good reason to try to protect themselves from the Jesuits.
Sincerely,
Linda
Dear Linda,
You are right on point.
Remember there were at least threee assassination attempts on Queen Elizabeth I's life during her reign. The pope's Bull of Excommunication calls her a Bastard Queen and thus pursuant to the Jesuit maxims, the first to get near her could kill her and it would be no murder. Remember the pope's financing the attack of the Spanish Armada in 1588? There were 30,000 soldiers on board the 120 ships ready to kill every Protestant in Engand and to deport the Queen to Rome for her torture and execution. Also remember the King James I openly expelled the Jesuits from England shortly after he took the throne in 1603, and he publicly burned the regicide doctrines of Jesuit Francisco Suarez.
Now about King James persecuting Roman Catholics, let us see. The Catholics were never forced to go to Protestant services until after the attempted assassination of Elizabeth. The wicked sinners brought it upon themselves. If those Roman Catholics were true nationalists as they should have been, they would have reported the Jesuit plot to assassinate their Queen. Further, Jesuit Gerard and Jesuit Provincial Henry Garnet were key planners and guides in the plot to blow up King James, his Roman Catholic wife, and his two sons along with the entire Parliament. That was the king's Jesuit condemnation for converting to Protestantism and favoring the Reformation.
Although there are many good facts in Tarpley's book on GHW Bush, Tarpley is in fact a bold-faced Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and I have called him such publicly. He is also tied to that Grand Orient Freemasona Lyndon LaRouche who is a fascist and fully intends to bring the Empire into a military dictatorship. LaRouche, like Tarlpey, are "good Roman Catholics."
Both Tarpley and LaRouche protect and defend the pope of Rome, that foreign monarch and fakir who claimes the right to rule the souls and governments of all men via his bogus Spiritual and Temporal Powers.
Good analysis below, Linda.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
Hello, Eric:
I have read some of your writings and find the data worth looking into further.
I thought you might find this interesting:
In his book 911 Synthetic Terror Webster Griffin Tarpley writes that the Guy Fawkes Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was a "false flag" operation (Pg. 68-70) planned by Lord Robert Cecil and the British government because "it was politically vital to keep persecuting the Roman Catholics." He gets this information from the "Jesuit Gerard".
It is appalling that Tarpley expects the world to forget the Catholic Inquisition , and the years of Bloody Mary burning Protestants in England just prior to Elizabeth's reign, and that the Jesuits were founded for the purpose of destroying Protestant Christianity (and Protestant governments).
What gutsy nerve to suggest that the (harmless) Jesuits would not try to
overthrow Queen Elizabeth's government! This gross distortion of history casts severe doubt on everything he writes. Why, then, have so many nations expelled the Jesuits if they do not engage in such subterfuge?
Many people writing on these topics appear to be Jesuits themselves, and perhaps the 'La Rouches' that Tarpley is linked to as well. There are no fingers pointing to possible intrigues of Rome at all in his writings.
He gives a talk on this on YouTube also:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=U73jn5OvZDY&feature=related
It is a shameless distortion of history, but even if it were true, the English had good reason to try to protect themselves from the Jesuits.
Sincerely,
Linda
Dear Linda,
You are right on point.
Remember there were at least threee assassination attempts on Queen Elizabeth I's life during her reign. The pope's Bull of Excommunication calls her a Bastard Queen and thus pursuant to the Jesuit maxims, the first to get near her could kill her and it would be no murder. Remember the pope's financing the attack of the Spanish Armada in 1588? There were 30,000 soldiers on board the 120 ships ready to kill every Protestant in Engand and to deport the Queen to Rome for her torture and execution. Also remember the King James I openly expelled the Jesuits from England shortly after he took the throne in 1603, and he publicly burned the regicide doctrines of Jesuit Francisco Suarez.
Now about King James persecuting Roman Catholics, let us see. The Catholics were never forced to go to Protestant services until after the attempted assassination of Elizabeth. The wicked sinners brought it upon themselves. If those Roman Catholics were true nationalists as they should have been, they would have reported the Jesuit plot to assassinate their Queen. Further, Jesuit Gerard and Jesuit Provincial Henry Garnet were key planners and guides in the plot to blow up King James, his Roman Catholic wife, and his two sons along with the entire Parliament. That was the king's Jesuit condemnation for converting to Protestantism and favoring the Reformation.
Although there are many good facts in Tarpley's book on GHW Bush, Tarpley is in fact a bold-faced Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and I have called him such publicly. He is also tied to that Grand Orient Freemasona Lyndon LaRouche who is a fascist and fully intends to bring the Empire into a military dictatorship. LaRouche, like Tarlpey, are "good Roman Catholics."
Both Tarpley and LaRouche protect and defend the pope of Rome, that foreign monarch and fakir who claimes the right to rule the souls and governments of all men via his bogus Spiritual and Temporal Powers.
Good analysis below, Linda.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
Cheney, Neocons Considered Killing Americans in Pretext to Attack Iran
Cheney, Neocons Considered Killing Americans in Pretext to Attack Iran
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
July 31, 2008
In the video here, taped at the Campus Progress journalism conference earlier this month, the Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh reveals how the neocons convened around Dick Cheney and brainstormed ways to kick off World War IV, as they fondly call their pet project to take out the Muslims and foment a contrived “clash of civilizations.”
According to Hersh, this meeting occurred after the neocons failed miserably to stage a rehashed version of the Gulf of Tonkin incident in the Strait of Hormuz, mostly because it is no longer 1964 and such Big Lies — thanks to the internet and bloggers — are far more difficult to float. “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there,” quipped LBJ about the imaginary act of North Vietnamese boats supposedly attacking U.S. ships, leading to the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and undeclared war in Southeast Asia, ultimately resulting in the death of nearly 60,000 Americans and around 3 million Southeast Asians.
In an exclusive Think Progress story, we learn the meeting took place in Cheney’s office and the subject on the table was “how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,” part of an ongoing effort to provide an excuse to attack Iran. “There was a dozen ideas proffered about how to trigger a war,” Hersh explains. “The one that interested me the most was why don’t we build — we in our shipyard — build four or five boats that look like Iranian PT boats. Put Navy seals on them with a lot of arms. And next time one of our boats goes to the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up.”
Hersh would have us believe this scenario did not play out because “you can’t have Americans killing Americans,” an absurd explanation considering the fact the attacks of September 11 were just that — “Americans killing Americans,” a calculated and cold-blooded act of mass murder carried out by elements in the U.S. government as a “new Pearl Harbor,” a cynical pretext to launch the “war on terror,” now grinding into its seventh year.
Ominously, these “ideas” hark back to Operation Northwoods, the JSC plan to stage a false flag terror event — or a number of events — designed to provide a pretext to invade Cuba and take out Fidel Castro. Such “ideas” included “friendly Cubans” attacking the U.S. base at Guantanamo, shooting down a drone disguised as a chartered civil airliner and blaming it on Cuba, inciting riots and staging terror attacks in Miami, and other terrorist acts. Fortunately, then Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, put a kibosh to this insane plan.
More recently, in January, 2003, in the lead-up to the Iraq invasion George Bush and Tony Blair discussed painting planes in United Nations colors “in order to provoke an attack which could then be used to justify material breach” and thus set in motion an invasion, according to Philippe Sands, a leading British human rights lawyer (see Revealed: Bush and Blair discussed using American Spyplane in UN colors to lure Saddam into war, Channel Four News).
In fact, the neocons have not rested in their effort to foment war and force the support of the American people by way of deception. On May 16, 2008, Paul Joseph Watson, writing for Prison Planet, noted confidential recordings released under the Freedom of Information Act revealing the efforts of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and top military analysts to cook up another terrorist attack on America in order to gain support for their ambitious plans to decimate Muslim culture. “The most extraordinary exchange takes place when Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong bemoans shrinking political support for Neo-Con war plans on Capitol Hill and suggests that sympathy for the Bush administration’s agenda will only be achieved after a new terror attack,” writes Watson. “Rumsfeld agrees that the psychological impact of 9/11 is wearing off and the ‘behavior pattern’ of citizens in both the U.S. and Europe suggests that they are unconcerned about the threat of terror.” Rumsfeld characterizes Bush as “a victim of success” because America has not suffered “an attack in five years” and for Rumsfeld and the neocons this state of affairs is indeed lamentable.
Obviously, the neocons will stop at nothing — including the murder of more Americans in a false flag terror attack — to realize their agenda.
Finally, Sy Hersh casts suspicion on himself during the interview when he admits he did not bother to write an article on the neocon casus belli brainstorming session because it did not go forward. “So I can understand the argument for not writing something that was rejected — uh maybe. My attitude always towards editors is they’re mice training to be rats…. But the point is jejune, if you know what that means.” It was “jejune” because Hersh believes the “American public, if you get the right incident, the American public will support bang-bang-kiss-kiss. You know, we’re into it.”
Of course, that may be true for some of the American public, even a large segment, but for those of us up to speed on the master plan of the neocons — total war, so the children of the neocons will “sing great songs about us years from now,” as Richard Perle once said — this comment stinks of irresponsibility. It avoids discussion of the criminal mindset of the neocons, who are determined to start WW IV, even if such a conflict leads to the distinct possibility the Prince of Darkness’ children may not be around to sing great songs.
The Truth Will Come Out Part 3
These two images above describe Berlin's Statue of Victory. Now it was designed by Heinrich Strack after 1864. This was done to commerate the Prussian victory in the Danish-Prussian war. Prussia was an old nation where Germanic people resided in. Prussia had also defeated Austria in the Austro-Prussian War (1866) and France in the Franco-Prussian War (1870–71). It's easily deciphered as a statue for victory in various wars of the 19th century. The statue has the female character called Victoria. The bronze statue of Victoria is 8.3 meters high and weighs 35 tons. That statue on top of the column was designed by Friederich Drake. It's a major Berlin tourist attraction. It has many occult symbolism on it. The columns blatantly have Greco-Roman influences to stabilize the whole structure. The columns look circular and in a cylinder shape throughout the statue. The statue of Victoria is holding a large spear. This spear has the Teutonic Cross. This same cross existed from the Knights of Malta and the Knights Templar (a group of warrior monks accused of occultism and sexual immorality by the Vatican). She is wearing a helping with the eagle symbol on top of her helment. The eagle has many meanings such as authority. She is holding a wreath and he has wings on her body. Some believe that Victoria looks very similar to the Goddess because historically strong women figures in the Western world at capital (or major cities) have Goddess images. These images can represent the Goddess Venus or the Goddess Minerva or Athena. Minerva represent wisdom in the occult tradition.
The 2008 Olympics in Beijing
Every four years, athletes from around the world meet to perform their sports. This event is called the Olympics. It is held during the summer and winter seasons. Some of the greatest athletes in world perform a wide variety of activities. People cheer for their respective countries in the stands. Typically in this era, the United States of America carry the majority of the medals, because Americans are some of the most athletically gifted athletes in the world. That's not bragging. I'm just outlining the facts. Is there more than meets the eyes to the Olympics? Yes. The ancient Olympics came about in ancient Greece during the time of 700's B.C. The men performed naked in ancient Greece. The sports included running, wrestling, throwing the discus and other performances. It continued until the ancient Roman Empire transpired where Roman leaders banned. It was reestablished by the late 1800's by a Frenchman Pierre de Coubertin. In the 20th century, few knew of the Nazi connection to some of Olympic imagery. The Olympics in 1936 occured in Berlin, Germany. This was in the time when Germany was overcome by the evil Nazi Empire. The Enquirer from August 14, 2004 wrote that the Nazis influenced many of the Olympic symbols. Many researchers commented that Hitler's Nazi propaganda machine popularized the five interlocking rings as the symbol of the Games. The Olympic rings as invented by Frenchman Baron Pierre de Coubertin (He was the founder of the International Olympic Committee. He is also the father of the modern Olympics movement, for a 1914 world Olympic Congress in Paris). It supposed to outline the first five Olympics, but the Congress ended when WWI began. Riefenstahl, the Olympia filmmaker who also chronicled Hitler's rise to power, used the symbols. Riefenstahl falsely claimed that the ancient Greeks had them. Hitler used it in the Nazi ceremonies in Berlin making it popular today. The interlocking rings look like circles. To occultists, the circles carrying many meanings like the sun and the number zero. Madame Blavatsky wrote in her book, Isis Unveiled, that: "Numbers are a key to the ancient views of cosmogony... all systems of religious mysticism are based upon numerals. The sacredness of numbers begins with the Great First Cause, the One (1) and ends only with the... zero -- symbol of the infinite and boundless universe." (p. 407). There are 5 rings and 5 is similar to the points of a Pentagram (which outlines the path of Venus). Some in the occultist obsess with numbers and view zero as man's state in perfection. Tony Perrottet writes in a new book, The Naked Olympics that the torch relay was concocted for Hitler's Berlin Games. The ancient Greeks opened the Olympics with word of mouth (via sending heralds) not by fire or torchbearers running through the streets. Hitler wanted to promote to belief in Aryan Supremacy in the games. The torch relay, memorialized in Leni Riefenstahl's film Olympia, was part of the Nazi leader's elaborate attempt to add myth, mystique and glamor to an Olympics intended to intimidate pre-World War II Europe. In his book "The Modern Olympics: A Struggle for Revival", American historian David C Young says the torch relay was invented by Carl Diem, a German who planned the 1916 Berlin Games before World War I. WWI forced their cancellation and the torch relay returned to be organized during the 1936 Games. In Hitler's eyes, the torch symbolized the perfection and victory of the German nation. Jesse Owens (a black American runner) shattered Hitler's lies of racial supremacy by winning the 100 meter race. Owens continued to win a total of 4 gold medals.
Everything is not what they seem even with the Olympic games. The Olympics to this day outline displays of false Greek gods of Zeus, Athena, Hercules, and Pegasus. That's ironic since the ancient athletes in Greece (over 2,700 years ago) would worship Zeus and consult magician in order to perform better. The Olympics definitely promote world peace, "uniting countries together", and "bringing the world together" which are all new world order ideals. It reminds me of the New Age goals of the evolution of human consciousness that some in the United Nations (i.e. Lucis Trust) adheres to. In August 8, 2008, the Olympics are in Beijing, China. Some have found out Pentagram symbols all throughout the Olympic Stadium in Beijing. The Stadium in China has many Pentagram images surrounding the outline of the structure. The Pentagram has many meanings as we all realize from Venus (a planet in our solar system), the Perfected Man, and the Chambers of Hell according to Pythagoras. These Summer Olympics are bringing a special ring of controversy. Some Chinese clubs are executing racism against black people. World Net Daily and other sources say that police are forcing some bar owners to sign pledges (at the Sanlitun bar district) to ban Africas and Mongolians from entering the premises of Beijing. The police deny it, but African residents in Beijing say that they are harrased by authorities and discrimination at the bars have increased. The South China Morning Post (which is a Hong Kong newspaper) said that businesses have been visited by police to not serve black people or Mongolians. This list of targeting by the Chinese government also include religious leaders. Also, there is China's apparent crackdown on Christians and Christianity in advance of the 2008 Games, including the expulsion of more than 100 foreign Christians in China in just a 90-day period. That's the biggest assault on the presence of Christianity in China since 1954. Chinese people in September of 2007 beat down dozens of blacks with rubber truncheon in the Sanlitun bar district according to witnesses. WND report on an incident where dogs raided an African owned bar and forced its occupants to take drug tests. A woman from Liberia said it's apart of racism. It is. Two Nigerian businessmen complained to the Post they were required to produce their passports before entering a Beijing nightclub while other foreigners were not. The truth is that racism is not only an issue in America. It's a global problem that is definitely being expressed in China. No nation in human history is perfect, but China has a long way to go in developing a more tranquil country without the evils of racism.
Other controversies exist in these Olympics. China is known for being an authoritarian government. China have collaborated with the Yahoo Company in manifesting Internet censorship. China possesses a huge population control plus forced abortion programs. These sick acts are dehumanizing life and institute a pernicious death culture. Even Pat Robertson (who is linked to Dominionist/Reconstruction theology) endorse the evil one Child Policy of China. Robertson is an establishment puppet. Pat even accepted microchips to a certain degree with is contrary to the Book of Revelation's prohibitions against taking the Mark of the Beast. China oppresses the religious liberty rights of unregistered Christians and other religious dissident groups like the Falun Gong. George W. Bush has supported the Olympics being held in China despite it being a national representation of a police state. Elitists like David Rockefeller, Rupert Murdoch and other just love China's policies. The USA NBA Team hope to recieve a gold medal. Dara Torres is a 41 year old swinner hoping to win gold in the Olympics. Dara will She will compete in the Beijing Olympic Games in the 50 meter freestyle, 4 x 100 medley relay, and 4 x 100 freestyle relay. There are also track and field performances plus others. There is nothing wrong with doing sports legitimately. God created many of us humans with great athletic abilities. To perform excellent feats is inspiring to watch. Yet, we shouldn't be carried away with athletics to the point of promoting globalism, promoting one world ideas, or nefarious principles.
Conclusion
Ella Anderson from July 18, 2008 reported on the amazing health benefits of Vitamin D. It's been known for a very long time about the contributions Vitamin D has on our health. It's easy to comprehend that vitamin D with the minerals of calcium and phosphorous can strengthen our skeletal structure. Pre-eclampsia is a harsh disorder. It is described as having high protein, edema, and proteinuria or protein in urine. Grave problems can occur toward mothers and fetuses with that disorder. Pre-eclampsia can develope premature delivery. It's the leading cause of maternal and infant death globally (making about 76,000 deaths per year). A Study issued by the University of Pittsburgh found that vitamin deficiency can make a 5 fold increase risk of developing pre-eclampsia. Diabetes is a very common illness in the Western world. Research found out that Vitamin D can lower a risk of having the chances of people having to develop Type 1 Diabetes (even if it's retrieved during childhood). Type II Diabetes gets much more media attention in America. Vitamin D therefore has been found benefits to make better outcomes in cancer (like breast, colon, and prostate cancers). In a breast cancer study, 24 percent in the breast cancer study had adequate levels of the vitamin D at the time of diagnosis. Those who were deficient were more likely to have the cancer metastasize or recur ten years later. Moreover, 73 percent of those with deficient vitamin D were more likely to die. A study in the International Journal of Cancer found that vitamin D protects cells from oxidative stress. This study used the most biologically active form of the vitamin, vitamin D3 along with nonmalignant human prostate epithelial cells. Metabolism of cells produces free radicals that can damage DNA and contribute to cancer formation and accelerated aging. Vitamin D will develop brain functioning as well. Sunlight is one of the easiest means to get Vitamin D. That's good, but of course over explosure of sunlight can cause problems. The Vitamin D Council recommends at least 1,000 IU (or 25 ug/day). Vitamin D is a necessary substance for all of us to utilize.
The Bohemian Grove ceremonies came in late July of 2008. One tidbit is that a Vanity Fair editor Alex Shoumatoff was arrested. He was charged with tresspassing. It's typical that the Bohemian Grove would do this, because the Grove is too cowardly to reveal their real agenda publicly. That's why many independent journalists and even some low level mainstream media individuals want to find the truth about the Bohemian Grove. The Bohemian Grove was invented in 1872 by a group of men (dealing with arts and literature) in San Francisco. It had 182 members by 1874. Later, it became more elaborate in having more prominent members there like politicans, media figures, corporate CEOs, and other world leaders. In fact every Republican President since Calvin Coolidge have gone to the Grove. Now, Democrats have gone there as well. Today, the Grove is located in the redwoods of Sonoma, Northern California. George W. Bush, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, James Baker, George H. W. Bush aand others have gone there. In there policy speeches are given. The Mandalay camp of the Bohemian Grove is where some of the most powerful members of the Grove go to. You can't just walk into the Mandalay without an appointment. Other camps and cliques include Cave Man, Hideaway, Hill Billies, Hillside, Isle of Aves, Lost Angels, Midway, Owl's Nest, Sempervirens, Silverado Squatters, and Stowaway. They are credited with concieving of the Manhattan Project. This project lead to the construction of the atomic where thousands of innocent Japanese citizens were murdered in 1945. 33rd Degree Freemason Harry Truman consented to the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One other big problem with the Grove is that the occult Cremation of Care ceremony exist where a human effigy (called the Dull Care) is sacrifice to a huge image. The Care according to Peter Martin Philips relates to Bacchus (a Roman false god which is better known as the Greek false god of Dionysus. Dionysus is the god of wine, sexual freedom, and ecstatic freedom) being afraid of Care. The ritual wants to rid of Care. Care is posing as a mocking spirit in the Cremation of Care ritual. It goes back to the Druids, Babylon, Greece, etc. Some have classified this ca. 40 ft. statue as Molech, but historically the owl statue is more related in reference to Minverva, Athena, or the Goddess. Goddess images date back to ancient Babylon (i.e. The female deity of Inanna is pictured with 2 lions and 2 owls) and Egypt. Pagan owl images exist in the homes of many elites. The owl emblem of Minvera in the occult world represents wisdom. One symbol of Adam Weishaupt was the owl representing wisdom also. Additionally, The Bethren of Minvera was a degree in the Bavarian Illuminati. Saint John of Nepomuk (in Bohemia) is the Patron saint of the Grove. Nepomuk in some stories refused to tell the confessional secrets of Queen Johanna of Bohemia to King Wenceslaus IV of the Bohemians (He was also King of the then Holy Roman Empire). John of Nepomuk was killed in 1393 according to a legend. There is even an old Bohemian Grove picture of a Mass being performed there. Hence a Vatican/Bohemian Grove link is there. Even President George W. Bush and John Kerry are related to old Bohemian kings many centuries ago. Therefore, there is more than it seems in terms of the Bohemian Grove. New reports outline male and female prostitutes having sex with many members at the Bohemian Grove. Especially, if some of these men are married, that's supremely wrong and immoral. Shoumatoff is more lucky, because others who tried the same thing he did were placed in jail for a long time. Chris Jones infiltrated the Grove with videos and he's in jail for 3 years. He showed his neigbhors the videos "Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove" and "The Order of Death" by Alex Jones. There are rumors that John McCain and Barack Obama might of came into the Bohemian Grove. They were in California in that time, so it wouldn't be surpising if both of them came into the Grove.
Individual liberty is an important thing to promote. It is about our God-given rights. It's about us helping ourselves and helping other human beings to develop their own selves. One of the most vital things we can do is peacefully develop our own foods and supplies. The reason is not only to benefit ourselves. It's also to help others just in case someone is suffering from a crisis. What are examples of this? There are many. The examples are to buy storeable food, grow our own garden, grow our own foods, help out Food Banks, and be prepared for any crisis. There are the economic crisis caused by the FED (which is a private central banking system cutting interest rates, the devaluation of the dollars, and other reasons. One big reason for the economic downturn is our foreign policy being dominated by neo-conservative philosophy. The war on terror has increased our deficit. The war on terror causes massive overspending when that money can be better utilized in bigger our nations' infrastructure (also health, education, etc.). Also, tax cuts on all Americans are fine not just targeted tax reductions that targeted toward the wealthy including multinational corporations. We are in a uncertain economic times (when the immoral policy of bailing out Bear Stearns while is done to the many victims of foreclosure), and if radical assistance isn't done, we could witness a hardcore depression. Self sufficiency is one of the goals any human being should aspire to. Yet, we ought to not forget to help out the poor voluntarily, because this is moral and we're all human beings here on this Earth. Extremism isn't in my cup of tea. I won't be like Michael Reagan calling for Mark Dice to be murdered. As for 9/11, I will never stop promoting 9/11 Truth. The government lied about the air quality immediately after 9/11 via the EPA. Many victims of 9/11 from rescue workers to firefighters have died because of the bad air quality (some passed away because of asbestos and other respiratory illnesses. As for subject matter, there is nothing wrong with outlining the facts of tons of issues. We should be active in exposing police brutalit, exposing voting fraud, predatory lending, expose the war on terror in general as a means where interests plus some in government are violating citizens' liberty, exposing imperialism, and the mercenaries like Blackwater caught acting as cops illegally in New Orleans (and killing innocent people. Blackwater is headed by Roman Catholic member Erik Prince. The Knight of Malta Schmitz is another leading figure in Blackwater as well). It's evident that George W. Bush is a puppet and both major parties are controlled by the same special interests (in the CFR, Vatican/Jesuits, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, etc.). It's a sad, but important fact to comprehend that the government performed inside jobs for thousands of years from Waco, Operation Gladio, to Operative Ajax. That's for real. The truth will come out regardless of the lies displayed by some quarters.
By Timothy
July 29, 2008
The Truth Will Come Out Part 2
Media Bias
It doesn't take a rocket science to comprehend that the mainstream media is consumed with bias. It isn't just toward one side or ideology. Media bias existed in America among many political perspectives spanning numerous decades. This is nothing new as the Bible says. The CIA created Operation Mockingbird in order to infiltrate the media. Back in that time (during the late 1940's and the early 1950's), the media had paranoia about Communism. The truth is that the international bankers (as admitted by Carroll Quigley's book entitled "The Tragedy of Hope") funded high level Communists in the Soviet Union, so these globalists can monopolize their economies (and control the world more. Quigley actually agreed with the new world order, but believed it should be more publicly. Carroll Quigley also admitted that a plan for a Pan-American Union existed). Quigley was the mentor and professor to Bill Clinton in the Jesuit Georgetown University. Bill Clinton was once apart of Demolay as a child. Bill Clinton was a famous puppet President who shown the horned Il Canuto horned handsign, he meet into a Bilderberg Group, he was involved in the Waco genocide, and committed other evil policies (in his Presidency from 1993-2001). Carroll Quigley spoke of the goal of some elites such as international bankers as:
"[The aim of the international bankers was] nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was
to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." ( Professor Carroll Quigley, 'Tragedy & Hope', p. 324. Can the Pilgrims, which Quigley never mentioned, verify his story of an Anglo-American Establishment?)
Propaganda is common on many avenues and I won't just expose bias in one network. Multiple networks have inherit bias. Let's be real here. The mainstream media isn't true free. The media that's global is controlled by a select few of corporations who are funded by the international elite in league with globalism. For example, the 5 major media conglomerates of AOL/Time Warner, News Corporation, Walt Disney, Vivendi Universal, and Bertelsmann control the vast majority of the mainstream media in the world. It's a monopoly and not a true free market of ideas. They control most of messages sent in the mainstream media. The good news is that the alternative media is growing in leaps and bounds. Anderson Cooper is an heir to one of Astor family and is related to the Vanderbilt family. Even Tucker Carlson is an heir of one of the big families. Of course, you can't write about the mainstream media without outlining words about FOX News. FOX News is a popular and controversial news network. Many liberals and musicians like Nas hates its guts because of perceived bias. Are they biased? Yes, and that's the case for other networks. All networks are biased in fact, because human beings are fallible people. On many occasion, media hosts and commentators daily carry out their emotions plus their political views on their selves. It's greater today, because the media has become more like popular culture with certain segments (that don't deal with real issues, but trivial points like celebrities and the like). FOX News is controlled by Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is one of the most powerful media figures in the world. He is a Papal Knight of St. Gregory, so the Vatican holds great influence on the man plus FOX News. One of the easiest examples of FOX News's bias is dealing with the Iraq War. Dale Stienreich wrote an article entitled "Fibbing It Up at Fox" which is located in LewRockwell.com. He said that FOX News tried to legitimize the war ever since it commenced in March 20, 2003. Shepard Smith (a FOX News commentator) said that Saddam is using flood water as a weapon (in March 14) and the Iraqis were planning to use large stores of napalm to kill coalition forces (in March 19). Even on March 24, Colonel Dave Hunt from FOX said why don't coalition forces blow up Al Jazeera TV. The media typically didn't take enough time to analyze and display the drawbacks of the war which are evident today. FOX have many fake conservatives like Ann Coulter considering supporting Hillary Clinton. Some ex-FOX employees believe certain memos exist to exhibit bias.
Former Fox News producer Charlie Reina explained, "The roots of Fox News Channel's day-to-day on-air bias are actual and direct. They come in the form of an executive memo distributed electronically each morning, addressing what stories will be covered and, often, suggesting how they should be covered. To the newsroom personnel responsible for the channel's daytime programming, The Memo is the Bible. If, on any given day, you notice that the Fox anchors seem to be trying to drive a particular point home, you can bet The Memo is behind it."
The most famous and controversial FOX News host is Bill O'Reilly. O'Reilly claims to be "Fair and Balanced" but that's impossible because our human nature. Now, on many times, he raises his voice for no reason at all to cut down a guest. There is nothing wrong with being emotional, but not to impede the ideas of another guest. Now, it's much easier to figure out bias dealing with him because Bill O'Reilly has a whole stack of quotations outlining his views. Here's one of Bill's famous quotes:
"Reverend, you can go back to Africa if you want to. I mean, you could go and repatriate back to the continent or anywhere. Not any country will take U.S. citizens, but African countries will."
--Bill O'Reilly, to slavery reparations advocate Rev. Al Dixon (The O'Reilly Factor, 3/6/01) Regardless if you agree with reparations or not, that comments was degatory.
For example, Bill O'Reilly called Hispanic people the "W" word with no apologies. He told blacks who strongly disagree with him that you can go back to Africa. One April 15, 2003, Bill O'Reilly said to African American students jokingly not to steal his hood caps of his car. O'Reilly called anyone who sincerely questions the official story of 9/11 are nuts, which is a lie. He agrees with the Iraq War and neo-conservative policy. There is nothing wrong with being biased if you want to. Yet, since Bill claims to have none so he must be called on it for his hypocrisy. People should be up front about their views and not sugarcoat it like FOX News is achieving time after time again. It's even been found out that Katie Couric from CBS was at a NOW gathering. Recently in late July 2008, ex-White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan accused some FOX News commentators like O'Reilly and Hannity of recieving talking points from the White House so to speak. Scott made a distinction between journalists (he said many of the journalists didn't recieve talking points from the Bush administration) and pundits. It is true that Hannity (along with other neo con talk radio hosts) has meet in the White House with Bush not too long ago to discuss policies and political strategies. Bill O'Reilly strongly denies the charge. O'Reilly called McClellan a liar and he has lost all respect for him. The truth will come out. The truth is that despite Scott telling the truth or not, FOX News does have very favorable coverage of the White House. The ultra-liberal National Organization for Women honored Couric at their annual Intrepid Awards Gala last week in Washington, DC. She quipped to her hosts that "[i]f everyone in the country was like you, CBS News would be number one." NOW is right that women should be treated with respect without unfair discrimination. Yet, NOW is wrong in supporting abortion on demand. Katie Couric calls herself a feminist. Katie is the host of CBS Evening News. When she was still on the Today Show in 1997, a guest named Whoopi Goldberg outed Couric's "pro-abortion" position ..ion when the comedienne revealed the two had attended a "pro-abortion" march together. Before her, liberal Dan Rather was its host on CBS Evening News. He's suing CBS presently for money problems. In October 2006, after the father of a victim of the Columbine shootings declared his pro-life position in a "freeSpeech" segment on CBS Evening News, Couric wrote on her blog that his view might be seen as "repugnant." Those views weren't repugnant but honorable. The disrespectful of human life and moral relativism does have a huge influence on the mindset on why school shooter enact their rampage of murder plus destruction. Hence, if you deny many liberal media leaders executing bias, you're wrong or falsely mistaken.
CNN is another famous network. It has been accused of bias mostly by conservatives. CNN has been caught with bais on many times just like FOX News has. One easy example is how once CNN head Ted Turner blatantly called Christians "losers" in a hateful manner. Turner wants the depopulation of most of the world's population. CNN Presents: God's Warriors was a three-part CNN Presents documentary produced by Christiane Amanpour. God's Warriors is the most bias religious documentary in the 21st century. It's a shame. It lied and compared conservative Christians to Muslim jihadists who have killed folks that disagreed with their religious beliefs. Christiane Amanpour was the narrator of the documentary. Amanpour lied and said that some Christians are playing the victim card. No, we're not playing the victim card when Christians are arrested in Canada, the UK, and the USA for just peacefully expressing their religious beliefs. We're not playing the victim card when Christians in America are ashamed and fearful to express their views publicly. We're not playing the victim card when the IRS' 401 (c)3 law stifles free speech of Christians and many other religious people from expressing their deeply held convictions inside of the pulpit. That's not a playing a card. That's presenting the facts. There's a big and monumental difference. Christiane also described how women with a dress code in a Christian school is equivalent to the sexist sharia law where folks force women to wear a dress across their whole bodies. Also, the documentary used falsehoods against Jewish believers and Muslim believers since the majority of Muslims reject the extremist Wahabbi Islamic bad tenets. The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), outlined criticisms against God's Warriors. Now, Christaine Amanpour wants to present a documentary called Buddhist Warriors which the commercial says they want peace. Amanpour is a hypocrite because she never takes the time outlining how certain religions in God's Warriors are seeking peace in the world. Now, she wants to praise the Buddists. Mormon Glen Beck is another case of bias. He presents himself as an authentic conservative, but he agrees with the war on terror and the Patriot Act. Also, he said degatory comments on air before. He once compared 9/11 Truthers to terrorists and classified the victims of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans as "scumbags." The innocent victims who died from Katrina were never scumbags at all. That's disrespectful obviously. Soledad O'Brian is narrated a new CNN documentary entitled "Being Black in America." This documentary ranges from discussing the family, the Black Man, the Black Women, and other issues. From seeing some of it, it's not as bias as God's Warrior. O'Brian herself has a black mother, so she wanted to take special time in giving as much an accurate portray as possible to outline some clarity about Black America. Some criticism against the documentary subscibe to the notion that it focuses too much on the negative aspects of black society in America. Despite that, the negative and the positive protraits of black Americans ought to accurately presented in the media and society.
MSNBC is another well known cable TV network. They have a whole list of personalities. Their major hosts include Dan Abrams, Joe Scarborough, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, David Gregory, and others. They classify themselves as the nation's fastest growing cable news network. Recently, they've taken an anti-Iraq War stance. For example, almost daily, Olbermann, Matthews, and even David Shuster criciticized the President's policy about that the war in Iraq. Each blatantly call for a withdraw from Iraq. Even President George W. Bush said he's willing to have a time "horizon" to eventually get rid of some of the American troops from Iraq. Even MSNBC news leaders admit to the liberal bent of their coverage. I have no problem with this as long as they admit it. I havemore respect for a network to admit to bias than sugarcoat it or put it under the rug. Even MSNBC isn't immune from extremism. Members of Morning Joe called for peaceful 911 Truthers to be tasers and sent ininto concentration camps. Joe Scraborough supported that and mocked 9/11 Truthers. Chris Matthews is a known Papal anti-gun, pro-abortion proponent. He even tries to intimidate people who even project legitimate dissent with the Roman Catholic Church. Keith Olbermann is right on many civil liberty issues and our freedom. Yet, Keith projects his information into the lenses of a Republican vs. Democratic battleline. The truth is that these issues are bigger than Democrat or Republican. It's about freedom, our civil liberties, and the opposition to tyranny plus oppression in society.
*What's the lesson here. The lesson is that you can't trust the media 100% of the time. The Internet and the alternative media harbor more Real News than the mainstream media ever had. Deception and lies ought to exposed and relinquished from our thoughts about the truth. The truth is absolute and the truth isn't always manifests in various mediums. It's the responsibility of us to figure out the truth and help our citizens to research plus recieve it. It's the 21st century and the manifestation of facts are more abundant. I wouldn't let spinmeisters like Bill O'Reilly, Glen Beck, Amampour, Bill Maher, and other intimidate me or get me down. I have joy, inspiration, intelligence, and a constant fighting mindset to pursuit my dreams and aspirations.
Symbolism Globally
Symbolism and architecture is one of the persistant emblems of civilizations. They encorporate numerous meanings. They harbor various emotions. These images inspire archaelogists and researchers to discover including researching its consists. It is also utilized by the evil global elite (and Secret Societies) for political or esoteric purposes. These are various symbols existing in the world now. Crests harbor sometimes a smorgasbord of occult symbolism. The image above is the shield of Prince Charles. Prince Charles is real related to the Windsor family. The Windsors are related to the Merovingian bloodline. The Merovingians are a family related to Presidents, prominent Kings, prominent Queens, and the real rulers of this world. Prince Charles and his son Prince William each have a strange history together. Each put a microchip on each other. William's mother was of course Princess Diana. Princess Diana is related to the Stuart kings (like Charles II and James II). The Stuarts historically were kicked out of England because of their policies and some of them were pro-Papacy. Prince Charles and Prince Williams are members of the elitist Order of the Garter organization. Tim Cohen is an authors who believes that the Order of the Garter is more powerful than the Order of Freemasonry. Prince Charles isn't a Freemason, but is one of the biggest Ecumenicals in the world with unity among the Muslim leadership. The seal above has lions and an unicorn. Lions from ancient Babylon/ancient Egypt all the way today means royalty and authority. The lion is an old logo for the land of Britian. One lion is standing up. There is a motto under the seal reading Dieu et mon droit, which is French for God and My Right. That phrase is embraced by Freemasonry and the occult. Morals and Dogma has the Latin version of God and My Right entitled Deus Meumque Jus. The phrase means that they depend on God to determine their Right or Justice. Doc Marquis claims that this phrase is common in Satanism. Another motto has the other French phrase of Honi soit qui mal y pense or Shame on him who thinks evil of it. There is a harp representing Ireland. The crest attempts to portray itself as Biblical, but even the Bible make no mention of such occult symbolism in this crest at all. Also, there are some in the British-Israelism heresy community that just love this seal, because they try to equate Britain with Israel. That's false because Jewish people are Semitic and even British people are related to Celts, Saxons, Jutes, Phoenicians, etc. The British people are made up of many ethnic groups and backgrounds spanning thousands of years. There are crowns representing Kingship. There is a Red Dragon in the Seal. The Dragon is in reference to Satan. The crest is very common on British Kings and nobility.
Ironically Prince Charles' seal looks very similar to the TBN logo. Trinity Broadcasting Network is a group promoting apostasy, globalism, and restricting numerous Christians from witnessing more of the truth. For example, TBN leader Paul Crouch unbiblically calls himself a god, Kenneth Copeland called God a loser, and Benny Hinn made numerous false prophecies. TBN are totally in league with the Left Behind dogma when the Scriptures call us to endure to the end plus Jesus Christ will come to the Earth immediately after the Tribulation. Then, the Bible says the Lord will send his angels for his elect. TBN is heavily influenced by the Vatican (with Paul Crouch praising the Pope) and Freemasonry (Freemasonry is Ecumenical and merges occultism like the Cabala and Sirius into theism). The TBN emblem has the crown, a lion, and an unicorn. There is a descending dove with roots from the occult. This dove is also found in the Fourth Degree of the Knight of Columbus. The K of C has 4 degrees and many of its members are policy officers. Jeb Bush is probably the most well known Knight of Columbus in America. There is a Celtic cross looking similar to the Knight of Malta logo. The Bible says that the Holy Sprit came upon the Earth like a dove (as found in Matt. 3:16, also Mk. 1:10, Jn. 1:32). Yet, we are not to make the Godhead into a graven image. The Holy Spirit still isn't a literal dove. According to New Ager Elizabeth van Buren's "The Sign of the Dove," the Dove as a white bird is sacred to Venus, Astarte, and Isis. The cross in the TBN logo looks similar to an old sun symbol. The banners read Rex regum et fidelum, which literally translates: "The king rule and faithful."
Dubai is a new place of resident and business of the elite (made up of the Pilgrims, the City of London, the Vatican/Jesuits, Bilderbergers, etc.) in the 21st century. Even Halliburton has decided to move into Dubai. Dubai is becoming the resort capital of the Middle East. Dubai is one of the major cities in the United Arab Emirates (or the UAE). It works in a federal framework. Dubai has the largest population in the region. Abu Dhabi is bigger than Dubai in its size in terms of the emirates in the Saudi Arabia Peninsula. Its' revenues are increasing to about 37 billion dollars as of 2005 (in terms of US money). Oil, natural gas, and other resources play a huge role in the development of Dubai's economy. Dubai like America is a multicultural society. It has Iranians, Pakistanis, Arabic people, Indians, Americans, etc. living there. From 1990 to 2008, Dubai has recieved tons of building construction in a rapid pace. The huge building is a planned Obelisk like resemblance Tower. An obelisk is a 4 sided pillar that was famously utilized by the ancient Egyptians. In Dr. Cathy Burns' "Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated" book on pg. 340, the obelisk was worshipped as the sun god. The Masonic writer Rollin Blackmer cites the pillar as representing the masculine part of the generation process in the occult. Dr. Burns cites a source saying that the obelisk is called also Baal's shaft or the shaft of Baal. The Washington Monument (including the huge 83 feet tall and weighing 320 ton obelisk in St. Peter's Square in the Vatican. It's 132 feet with its foundation) are one of the numerous modern obelisk images that still exist to this day. The Dubai skyscraper is huge being 2,725 feet tall. That's about a half mile high. They plan on completing it by September 2009. If it's done, it will be the tallest man-made structure on Earth. The skyscraper is called Burj Dubai. The Samsung Corporation is building it. There are more plans of even taller buildings on the drawing boards. For example, one in Jedda, Saudi Arabia could be about a mile tall in 5,520 feet (It's the brainchild of Saudi billionare Prince al-Walid bin Talal). Another, skyscraper is proposed to be 10,500 feet in the United Arab Emirates. That's huge and almost 2 miles tall! Also, there an artifical island in Dubai looking like a palm tree with a circular image on top of it.
The image on the left is an old painting of the Tower of Babel. This painting was completed in 1563 by Peter Bruegel. The Tower of Babel is mentioned in Genesis 11:1-4 as about Nimrod seeking to create a tower to reach unto the Heaven. Yet, God Almighty stopped it, cofounded their language in order to spread humanity across the globe. Now, New Agers and Secret orders still to this day lust after building structures into the Heaven. They promote this in order to promote their vain, false vision of merging heaven and Earth (as above, so below reflecting the Universe as related to the plain of the Earth). Freemasons even praise the Tower of babel. For example, Freemason Arthur Edward Waite classified Babel as a Masonic enterprise (Nimrod is praised as a founder of Freemasonry in some literature). A rebel like Nimrod shouldn't be a real Bible-believer's heroes at all. The image on the right is the headquarters of the European Union. Notice how the EU building in Brussels, Belgium looks similar to the old Tower of Babel painting. This European Parliament Bulding is new and reserved its 666 seat. Why would they do that? 666 in the book of Revelations from the Bible is the number of the Beast. The Beast is a code name for the Antichrist that according to Bible prophecy temporarily rules the world and presecutes the real Christians. Christians are beheaded for their faith as cited in the book of Revelations as well. The EU is known to have aspirations to be a global force not only in Europe but of the whole world.
This is a known and famous Masonic image. It's a picture of a winged man holding a woman's hair. The man carries a scythe. Also, a column is broken. There are many interpretations for the image of the broken column. One meaning is the broken column means early. Yet, according to Joseph Fort Newtown's book entitled "The Builders: A Story and Study of Masonry" (from, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, at The Torch Press, from 1914, on p. 9) describe the logo as signifying false gods. Edmond Ronayne wrote that: "... Egyptian Mythology, Isis is sometimes pictured weeping over the broken column, which conceals the body of her husband, Osiris, while behind her stands Horus, or Time, pouring ambrosia over her hair." (Short Talk Bulletin, "The Broken Column", Feb, 1956, p. 6-7; also Edmond Ronayne, The Master's Carpet (Mah-Hah-Bone), 1879, p. 387-88, and several other Masonic authors). Therefore, the column represents the phallus of Osiris. The woman Isis is crying over the death of Osiris. Horus or Time is standing behind the female. In other images, the broken column lands on the 3rd step of the base of the structure. The weeping virgin holds a spring of acacia and an urn. The book is a copy of the Book of Constitutions with Masonic imagery as well. The Old Father Time man is trying to disentangle the ringlets of her hair. The old Osiris story relates to the Masonic story of the death of Hiram Abiff.
That image is apart of Manly P. Hall's book entitled "The Lost Keys of Freemasonry." Now, Manly P. Hall is praised by Freemasons. In fact, the Scottish Rite's New Age Magazine classified Hall as Masonry's Greatest Philosopher in the 20th century. He once headed the research school of the Rosicricians at San Jose, California. Manly P. Hall's other book described occultism and the essential meaning of Freemasonry. He should know of course, because he was a 33rd Degree Freemason. In his literature, he admitted that Freemasonry was the merging of Theism and the Mystery Religions' concepts applied to their lives. That is evident because you can simply join Freemasonry by being 21 years old and above, sane, a male, being invited, and subscribe to a belief in one God (they don't prescribe which god it is). That is why many Masons like Manly P. Hall worshipped Lucifer. Lucifer in the Bible comes from Isaiah. It described Lucifer as falling to the Earth as said by God so Lucifer isn't God. Christians called Lucifer Satan because of this description. This is Hall's own words of him praising Lucifer:
'Illustrious' Manley Palmer Hall 33°
The Secret Teachings of All Ages
"I hereby promise the Great Spirit Lucifer, Prince of Demons, that each year I will bring unto him a human soul to do with as as it may please him, and in return Lucifer promises to bestow upon me the treasures of the earth and fulfil my every desire for the length of my natural life. If I fail to bring him each year the offering specified above, then my own soul shall be forfeit to him. Signed..... { Invocant signs pact with his own blood } " page CIV
'Illustrious' Manley Palmer Hall 33°
The Lost Keys Of Freemasonry
"When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy." page 48
What more proof do you need of many Masons worshipping Lucifer or Satan. Now, the image above have much symbolism. There is a man with Egyptian dress. His arms are lefted up and he hold an ankh symbol. The ankh is an ancient Egyptian symbol representing life. It's also known as the crux ansata. It was frequently accepted by the ancient Egyptian kings and queens. It is also in reference to the masculine and feminine qualities of nature (that's similar to the definition of generation). The ankh have been defined as an emblem of fertility, immortality, and used in the occult. Regardless to this day, worshippers of Ra, New Agers, and other utilize the ankh symbol. Now, the man is standing an altar. The man is also upon a capless pyramid. He has a triangle on his clothes. There are 2 All Seeing Eye. One one sideo the altar, there is an dot in a circle image. The point in the circle is yet another emblem of generation. The dot is the phallic symbol and the circle is the female symbol. Some have called it the great sex act. This isn't just me writing this. Masonic have admitted that the dot in the circle is in reference to sun worship: "...The point within the circle is an...important symbol in Freemasonry, but it has been debased in the lectures (given in lodges) that the sooner that the interpretation is forgotten by the Masonic student, the better will it be. The symbol is really a beautiful but somewhat abstruse allusion to the OLD SUN-WORSHIP, and introduces us for the first time to the modification of it, known among the ANCIENTS AS THE WORSHIP OF THE PHALLUS. (Albert Mackey, The Manual of the Lodge, Clark Maynard Co., New York, 1870, p. 156). Another source says: "The Indian interpretation makes the point the male principle, the circle the female; the point became the sun and the circle the solar system which anicent peoples thought was the universe because the sun is the vivifying, the life-giving principle, for all that lives." (the Masonic Short Talk Bulletin, "Point Within A Circle", August, 1931, Vol. 9, No 8, Reprinted July, 1990, p. 4). Now, people like William Morgan died, so we can have the oppurtunity to expose the Masons, the Jesuits, the Rosicurcians, the Skulls and Bones, the Bohemian Grove, and other occult groups. Well, we don't have to yield to secrecy and death oaths as found in Freemasonry. There is real hope in God. John 3:16 fulfilled explained how we can experience real salvation: "...16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life...."
By Timothy
July 28, 2008
The Truth Will Come Out
The Truth Will Come Out
Life is a continuous event. Among us, it's temporary since all humans will die. We ought to make the best of it. One way for me to make the best of my life is researching information, exposing the new world order, and solving the mysteries of life. To me, sincerely that's one of reasons God put me here on this Earth. By the year 2001, I investigated these specific issues on a higher plan and I'm not going back. It's been a wild journey for me. Although, I'm young since I'm 24 now. Hopefully, I can live a long life. I want to, but if that isn't the case, I just want the world to know to witness my views on a wide variety of subjects. It's perfect reasonable for folks to glance at my points of view as well. Barack Obama, John McCain, and Third Parties (like Constitution Party member Chuck Baldwin, Green Party Cynthia McKinney, and Libertarian Party candidate Bob Barr. There are other candidates as well) are vying for the White House. It's an emotional and historical race to a great degree. Some are overly sensitive about any criticism against John McCain as unpatriotic. Some are conversely over sensitive about any legitimate dissent against Barack Obama as being racist. There is nothing inappropriate about being sensitive about real issues. Although, you have to allow vigorous debate in a free society. If you don't, this isn't a real free society in America. For me, John McCain and Barack Obama are fallible and they aren't Gods nor Messiahs to me. God is God period. The deal is that we should investigate all of the Presidential candidates to decipher a wise decision on who to vote for. Typically, the mainstream media won't delve into the real agenda of Barack Obama and John McCain. Cutting Edge Ministries just wrote an article on how Obama and McCain are 22nd cousins who descended from King Edward I of England. Hence, many Presidents and Presidential candidates from major parties are related to each other (including the Merovingians, the Saxe-Coburg Gothas, and other elite bloodlines. These bloodlines have some of the most powerful people existing in the world now plus centuries ago). I just found out something about Obama. His wife Michele isn't just a CFR member, his foreign policy advisor is Zbigniew Brzezinski (he wasn't just the co-founder of the globalist Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski is the member of the Bilderberg Group, which has ties to the EU. Brzezinski wrote a book called the Grand Chessboard about planning a war in Central Asia to get resources). The book also described a police state system domestically at home. This is similar to what we see presently in 2008. He funded Osama bin Laden to fight in Afghanistan in the late 1970's. Brzeziski wrote about wanting a technocratic revolution. The essence of Brzezinski's goal is to allow countries play against each other rather than preemptive wars.Bilderberger and North American Director of the Trilateral Commission Joseph Nye is another ally of Barack Obama. Bonesman Austin Goolbsee is an economic advisor to Obama. He is a professor of economics at the University of Chicago. He (according to Webster Tarpley) told Canadians that Obama agrees with the obscene trade deal called NAFTA. World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah said that Obama called for a civilian national security force. This is ignored by the corporate media. Others believe that Obama was just calling for volunteers to just praticipate in groups like the Peace Corps. If Farah is correct, that is surprising since this is one of the most overt, anti-liberty proposals that Obama promoted in public. Youtube recorded Obama saying: "...We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." WND reported on this story that the mainstream media isn't touching on. He wants to add this to the military. The problem is that a civilian security force (even if Obama didn't literally mean a Stasi unit) is that it is not mentioned in the Constitution. Definitely, such a group shouldn't be as big as the military. It's strange and Barack offers no specifics on what this group will do. Historically, the canned TIPS programs promoted such a snitch squad. Some may say that he's talking about the economy plus the Peacorps, but a national civilian police is still wrong. That is a troubling statement because no where in the Constitution even remotely calls for a national security force to supplement to the U.S. military. Obama talked about youth service, but this new group is very expensive. Some view this proposal as similar to spy programs like the Highway Watch program. That program is a $19 billion dollar Homeland Security-run project which trains truckers to watch for suspicious activity on America's highways. More recently, ABC News reported that "The FBI is taking cues from the CIA to recruit thousands of covert informants in the United States as part of a sprawling effort…..to aid with criminal investigations." Is this the change we want? Regardless of what Obama meant, I don't want a National Stasi like spying operation monitoring my life or anyone else's lives at all.
John McCain is also similar to Barack Obama. John McCain says that killing unborn babies for rape and incest is fine. He wants a war with Iran if necessary. McCain spoke in mocking terms to Iran as being bombed and such. He even desired to be in Iraq for as long as 100 years. That's pretty extreme, because the Iraq War is having a serious cost physically and economically to the American people. McCain called for a new clique of democracies to help ferment his foreign policy agenda. Therefore it isn't surprising that Henry Kissinger is one of John McCain's biggest supporters. CBS News from December 19, 2007 had an article written by Dante Higgins describing how Henry Kissinger have even stumped for John McCain. This occurred in Boston's Faneuil Hall. Kissinger classified McCain a man who can bring the country together. John McCain claims that his aggresive, neo-conservative foreign policy approach is necessary to develop a more safe atmosphere in America. Yet, the war on terrorism has only decreased our liberties and contributed to our eonomic downturn (because of the devalued dollar currency and the high war debt that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have accumulated over the past almost 7 years). These outcomes aren't making us more safe. It's manfacturing a more harsh Big Brother control grid society. McCain is more of a puppet compared to the high level neo-conservatives like CFR member Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz. Paul Wolfowitz recently made some comments. He is the former Deputy Secretary of Defense. He said that America's leadership in post-Bush world would depend on how threatening the world appears. He even hints that a "compelling crisis"may help America's stature in the world. That's sick of course because the death of innocent people or formulating a crisis is never worth our exploitation or to use that for political advantage in terms of foreign policy affairs. Here's his own words:
"America's future leadership role may depend even more on how threatening the world appears. Historically, that leadership role has often emerged out of a compelling crisis: Pearl Harbour, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran hostage crisis, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, or the attacks of 9/11."
This Wolfowitz Doctrine implies for US troops to be sent globally and there is a concrete promotion of preemptive war. Fellow neo-con Kagan said that they want multilateralism as a means to complete their agenda because of the unpopularity of the Iraq War. That is why they and John McCain promote the League of Democracies when America was never instituted as a democracy. We were established as a Republic. This plan runs contrary to the orginal intent of the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers weren't perfect, but they weren't wrong on this issue. Founding Fathers like George Washington adhered the philosophy of encouraging no entagling alliances and rejecting unwarranted, extensive involvement in foreign countries' affairs. We should exist as a nation and not an Empire as some neo cons proclaim. The difference now from the PNAC days is that men like Wolfowtiz want to use multilateralism as means to promote preemptive tactics while submerging our national sovereignity into internatonal bodies. John McCain is far from a real conservative despite what the Huffington Post says. The Huffington Post promotes the left/right paradigm.
Chicago is known for its extreme laws and nefarious proposals. WMAQ TV from July 16, 2008 reported that the Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich seeks a radical answer to the crime epidemic in Chicago. He wants the National Guard and the state Police to patrol the streets of Chicago. Blagojevich said that a child has been shot nearly every day since June 26. The governor wants to plan National Guard helicopters to get into high crime areas. He said that he desires this to put less burden on the Chicago police. It's a known fact that the Chicago police were and are caught in brutality. One easy example to justify that assumption is how they've assaulted even innocent people in 1968. This was during the National Democratic Convention. In December 1969, some Chicago police officers shot Fred Hampton dozens of time. Fred Hampton was a famous Black Panther leader who was articulate with his message when Fred was in his early 20's. This action was so immoral that Hampton's relatives sued the city of Chicago and won the lawsuit. Later, the Chicago police have done brutality to this day in their own city. The mayor of Chicago Daley said that he seeks to achieve all that he can do in order to stop the violence in Chicago. Yet, fascism and martial law are never solutions in stopping crime. The National Guard has no right nor role in law enforcement in Chicago or any other city. That city has never been declared a state of emergency at all. Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. Sadly, Chicago is probably the gun control capital of America. Hence, that is one reason why crime is so high there. Criminals roam free with guns, while law abiding citizens are limited in their right to own a gun. Now, Blagojevich has signed a tougher gun bill. This bill bans an adult from selling a gun to a minor. Now, adults (if they sold a gun to a minor) are eligible for the same sentence as minors convicted of violent crimes. That despicable because it doesn't punish crime. This law will only punish those innocent folks selling something to minors. Minors used guns for centuries. An adult teaching a child about guns isn't immoral nor foreign to a legitimate society. The real bigger picture is the National Guard being proposed to be utilized in illegal means.
Barack Obama gave another speech in Berlin, Germany in July 24th, 2008. A crowd of over 200,000 people congregated to visualize Barack Obama speaking. The crowd was very receptive to Barack's views because he was in Europe. Polls consistently present how Europeans give a low regard for the Bush administration. Barack Obama is a gifted, great orator. Some portions of the speech I agreed with and other parts of the speech I disagree with. Now, in the beginning of his speech, Obama gave a story about his father bascially giving him the inspiration to carry forward the rise of his political career. The tone of his speech was to connect the links and relationships among America, Germany, and the world. For example, Barack Obama said that walls among religions, immigration, etc. ought to be broken down in order to develop the stability of a society. Obama said that America made crucial errors in its history. Although, he pointed out that he still loves America still. Barack Obama outlined a description of America being made up of a whole list of backgrounds and cultures in order to represent the true essence of the compositon of the USA. The tone of the speech was humble, yet firm. The audience cheered him. Even with all of this, Barack Obama isn't perfect just like John McCain isn't perfect. Both of them like a carbon credit system when that's impossible to enforce. The reason is that carbon is natural chemical vital for humans and other organisms to survive. Recent scientific studies refute the claims of man-made global warming (when the solar system is warming via the sun, there are record cold winters globally, etc). Obama in the Berlin speech said that he was a world citizen, and that he sees the world as one. Obama wanted to extrude an appeal to build up the view that he is capable of handling complex foreign policy matters. Now, this is a globalist, international view which is very similar to Brzezinski's view. See, Zbigniew Brzezinski called for a transnational approach for decades and he's the foreign policy advisor to Barack Obama. Brzezinski (the man who inflamed Afghanistan by supporting Osama bin Laden in the late 1970's) is a heavyweight in geopolitics since he's a member of the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. Barack Obama met with French President Sarkozy in France. Subsequently, Obama went into London, England to met with Gordon Brown. So, McCain and Obama are stirred by the global elite. I respect other nations, but I'm no citizen of the world. I'm a citizen of America. I part company with Barack on that issue. I believe in working with other nations, but not at the expense of forming a global citizenship or wanting an "one world." Obama promotes globalism by his own words: "...That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down..." Daniel Taylor wrote that Obama's speech mirror the goals of the Council on Foreign Relations of breakingdown walls of nations and religions (Obama said this). That's true because the President of the CFR Richard Haas said that: "... "The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy." and "..."The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy." I don't agree with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Each nation even have nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11. The cost of many innocent deaths among civilians and military individuals isn't worth the neo con strategy of nation building plus preemptive warfare at all. Both John McCain (with his promotion of his proposed League of Democracies) and Barack Obama seek globalism in paranoia about climate change and terrorism. Like in numerous Presidential election, the major candidates are related to European Royalty. In fact, Obama and McCain Are 22nd Cousins Descended From King Edward I of England! Obama and Cheney are related as cousins. Even Obama and Bush are related in their genealogy. So, the Presidential Election of 2008 is a show, votes are regularly violated all of the time, and we ought to help out first in our own communities (because at least we realize tangible benefits).
Civil liberty and economic problems still consume society. John Hughes from Bloomberg at July 18, 2008 made known that the TSA Triples airport body scanners. This includes the purchase of 80 Passegner Imager machines. That total will be up to 120 machines in 21 airports according to Christopher White (he's a spokesman). The imagers are produced by L-3 Communications Holdings Inc., OSI Systems Inc.'s Rapiscan unit and American Science & Engineering Inc. These devices use X-Rays in order to outine a traveler's bodies of electromagnetic waves create a fuzzy image. TSA are using it now as a replacment for TSA scanners using handheld detectors. Today, TSA will buy 300 advanced technology X Ray scanners to check bags. They want to include the scanners to 900. The TSA caims that they want to prevent the carry of plastic explosives in airplanes. Although, Big Brother is increasing and some of these X Rays have been used to monitor people's whole bodies. Shaun Waterman from the United Press International on July 18, 2008 exposed on how protesters in Maryland were spied upon by state police and were added to federal list of terrorist suspects. Undercover Maryand state troopers infiltrated three groups that advocate peace. There is a 46 page document (which was obtained by the Maryland chapter of the ACLU via the FOIA lawsuit) describing the account of an activist's name placed into a federally funded database. This is done to share information among state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies on terrorists and drug trafficking suspects. ACLU attorney David Rocah said state police violated federal laws prohibiting departments that receive federal funds from maintaining databases with information about political activities and affiliations.he activist's name is Max Obuszewski. This is of course wrong, because the federal government has no right monitor innocent protestors who are anti-war. This is nothing new because the government has been caught spying on innoent people like Protestors and even Quakers.
Zeitgeist
The movie "Zeitgeist" is becoming very popular in the alternative media. The atheists and anti-religious crowd especially love the film since the film hates the views of religious belief. Frankly, religious people made more contributions (Just look to William Tyndale, William Wilberforce, George Washington Carver, and others) to society than any atheist did at all. Also, there is nothing wrong with believing in God or a Supreme Being who created the Universe. I think it's a disgrace to the real patriot movement. The reason is that many real Patriots believe in God. This film using divisive tactics (the same tactics the new world order crowd does) in intimidating people who sincerely believe in God. Additionally, it's a movie using half truths and lies to get their points across. Lies will never be effective in waking up individuals about the new world order and the problems in our society. Zeitgeist is accurate on some topics. The film is right that the Federal Reserve is a private banking system that devalues our currency and control our economic system. Zeitgeist is correct to point out the nefarious history of the Vatican. The Vatican has been complicit in the Crusades, the Inquistion, the murder of the saints, the murder of innocent Jewish people, the invention of the modern slave trade, and other degenerate events. Today, The Vatican/Jesuit network has huge power via the Knights of Malta (who were caught in the Ratline which allowed Nazis to escape justice), Opus Dei, the Knights of Columbus, the Constantnian Order, etc. Romanism has 1.1 billion members making it the most powerful religious group in the world. Paganism is easily found in Romanism from Halloween, Easter, to the holiday of Christmas. Some even in the alternative media refuse to discuss these issues for some reason. The film is right that world leaders have called for a new world order and an one world government (like David Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Walter Cronkite, and Henry Kissinger). They rightfully expose the SPP or the Security and Prosperity Partnership which is apart of a North American Union agenda. Even ex-President Vicente Fox endorsed a North American union and a single North American currency in a long term goal to be similar to the European Union. I saw him on TV and on Youtube admitting to this. Therefore, many leaders seek this wicked globalization in the world. Many leaders have promoted global government for a long time.
Here's examples of the inaccuracies in Zeitgeist. The film is notorious assault against Christianity. Beit Shalom Ministries outlined a popular film exposing "Zeitgeist called Zeitgeist: Spirit of the Age Refuted." The film was narrated by Michael Worsley. Zeitgeist believes that Christianity was created for social control. Is this true? The answer is no. The reason is that Christianity was not created by political elites. In the book of John, the Bible calls Satan as the temporary ruler of this world. Also, Peter said to Obey God rather than man. Early Christians were harshly persecuted in the times of the ancient Roman Empire and throughout the history of the past 2,000 years. Also, the Bible forbids taking the Mark of the Beast in the Book of Revelations. This mark is part of social control instituted by the Last Day Antichrist government system. This mark looks similar to the Verichip microchip. Therefore, real Christianity isn't about unlimited government submission or social control. Real Christians follow God not man or his social control mechanisms. The Bible has been exploited by political elites before though like the FEMA plan to use pastors to submit to the government (i.e. to be pacified) in times of martial law. FEMA wants the pastors to do what FEMA wants. Some sources are promoted in Zeitgeist Part 1 that are either biased (or false) or blatantly pro-new world order. Many of these sources are used more than once. DM Murdock is a source and this is a code name for Acharya S (a woman who is a known Christ hater). Achraya S believes that the story of Jesus Christ is a rehash of stories about solar deities in Ancient Egypt especially. Druid and Egyptologist Gerald Massey is another source there as well. Atheist John Allegro wrote a book about the Mushroom that suggests similar ideas about early Christians using illicit drugs. Historical scholars criticized him as his views based on false theology. The creators of Zeitgeist use the source of Theosophist HP Blavatsky. Blavatsky blatantly promote ideas about the new age and the new world order. Her book the Secret Doctrine influenced the Nazis. "The Secret Doctrine" is her book where she praised Lucifer and Satan. HP Blavatsky is quoted as writing that: "...And now it stands proven that Satan or the Red Fiery Dragon, the Lord of Phosphorus..and Lucifer or Light Bearer is in us...it is our mind [our] Redeemer, our intelligent liberator and Saviour form pure animalism..." ( HP Blavatsky, "The Secret Doctrine," Vol. 2, The Theosophical University Edition, pg. 513). Gerald Massey wrote for the Theosophical magazine entitled "Lucifer." Also, Theosophist Alice Bailey wrote in favor of the endgame of some Secret Societies in desiring a world government plus a world economy. Why would this movie give credence to a Theosophist when they are league with globalism? It could only be that Zeitgeist embrace disinformation.
It's interesting to note that the 3 sources of Goodfrey Higgins, Manly P. Hall (a proponet of the plot of exploiting America to form a New Atlantis then world democracies in an utopia), and Albert Churchward are all Freemasons. Notice how Zeitgeist doesn't expose Freemasonry as a tool of the new world order at all. Usually the film refuses to offer other points of view on religion but one anti-religion mindset. Usually, unbaised films show many views not just one on an issue. They even cite George Carlin to mock religion and God, but a using a comedian to ridicule religion as an argument is a fallacious attempt to make sense of their arguments. Zeitgeist teaches that the Gospels are based on astrology. The truth is that Virgo is not similar to Mary in its cosmology at all. Also, the existence of Bethlehem is real and is documented by Josephus. JB Hennessy writes of Bethlehem being inhabited since the Iron Age period and before that time. Achraya S believes that the 12 disciples were based on the 12 characters of the Zodiac. The truth is that Moses is never identified as a Ram. Achraya S claims that Jesus will bring in the Age of Aquarius, but that age will never come until the year of 2150. She claims that Jesus is the Lamb and the Ram, but Jesus was never identified as a Ram. Also, A Ram is never a Shepherd at all. The pattern of these liars is that they use animals symbols to attempt to connect with Christianity, but in essence they outline non-sequitors. In other words, skeptics just connect items without evidence of astrological links. Not to mention, that the prophet Isaiah in the Bible condemns astrology and using the stars for mystical purposes in Isaiah 47:13-14. God condemns the worship of the sun, stars, and planets. The biggest claim of the film Zeitgeist is that it believes that Jesus Christ is a pagan myth. The Apostle Paul in Colossians 2:8 condemned the traditions of men. The film claims that Horus was born in December 25th, it was from a virgin, 3 Kings saw him, he was a teacher at 12, he was baptized, Horus performed miracles, called the Son of God, resurrected after 3 days. The truth is that no original ancient Egyptian sources promote these claims of Horus. In the Egyptian myth, Osiris was murdered by his jealous brother named Seth. The Horus is a complex character and many gods were known as Horus. Once, Horus was viewed as bird. Later, he was seen as a child in the arms of Isis, her mother. Isis wasn't a virgin and Osiris wasn't resurrected since he was relegated to the world of the Dead. Horus avenged the death of her father Osiris' death. Horus was called the son of Ra as well. Horus' birth wasn't accompanied by a star in the east, Horus didn't have 12 disciples, and Horus wan't even crucified. Also, no biblical reference exists of Jesus Christ being born in December 25th at all. The film Zeitgeist talks about the 3 wise men meeting esus Christ as a baby, but the Bible don't cite 3 wise men at all. The Bible only cites a group of wise men. These pagan myths change constantly, but God in Malachi 3:6 says that: "....I am the Lord, I change not..." Hebrews 13:8 show the same thing about Jesus Christ. According to Charlie Campbell the story of Attis rising from the death wasn't mentioned until after 150 A.D., which was long after the time of Jesus. Even Attis was reborn from a tree and not resurrected from a tomb at all. The film clams that Krishna is similar to Jesus Christ being of a virgin birth, having a star in the east, etc. The truth is that Krishna wasn't birth of a virgin birth. Krishna had no star in the East, but Krishna fought monsters. Krishna was murdered at his heel by an arrow according to Dr Edwin Bryant (he's a scholar of Hinduism, Ph.D. in Indic languages and cultures, and Professor of Hinduism at Rutgers University). Dr. Bryant denies Krishna was crucified at all. Some view Jesus as a rehash of Mithras but that is false as well. Mithras was born from a rock, he didn't experience the Virgin Birth, he never performed miracle, he wasn't crucified, and Mithras wasn't resurrected from the dead at all. Therefore, Jesus Christ isnt Mithras or a rehash of it. Then there was Mithras and Sunday. Yet, Jewish people and even Jesus celebrated the Sabbath on Saturday. Christians celebrated God in worship daily (which includes Saturday and Sunday. There is nothing wrong with worshipping God on any day of the week). (Acs 2:46-47). Claims of Christianity being a rehash of the ancient Mysteries are opposed by many experts. The narrator of Zeitgiest says that Achraya S is right to point that an inscription in Luxor, Egypt outlines the birth and life similar to Jesus. The Luxor inscription oulines the Queen of Egypt and sex not necessary Isis. It has state officials and not Kings. An Atheist Richard Carrier disputes the Luxor claim made by Zeitgeist.
Tacticus from 112 A.D. describe Jesus Christ as murdered under the procurator Pontius Pilate. He called Jesus' doctrines as spreading as far as Rome. Lucian who was a Greek satirist outline Christians and outline Jesus as crucified. The Roman Historian Suetonius (who lived from 69 to 122 A.D.) wrote that: "He banished the Jews from Rome who were continually making disturbances, Chrestus being their leader," This statement confirms the exile of Jews from Israel in the 40's A.D. from the Book of Acts. Thallus in 52 A.D. wrote an eclipse of the sun which some view as the season of the Paschal full moon when Jesus Christ was crucified. Dr. Ronald Nash from his book "The Gospel and the Greeks: Did the New Testament Borrow from Pagan Thoughts?" writes that: "...The conception that the god dies and is resurrected in order to lead his faithful to eternal life is represented in no Hellenistic mystery religion." Hence, Christianity being a rehash of the Mystery Religions are refuted. Zeitgeist is hiding their hatred of not only Christainity but any belief in God. 1 John 2:22 and 1 Timothy 4:1-3 are Bible verses about this issues as well.
*In essence, the film Zeitgeist promote the interests of the new world order. The reason is that they want to bash religion when real religious freedom is a threat to the Elite. They believe in wanting to destroy religion to form a new society. They even accept Greenpeace when many Greens are co-opted by the Club of Rome and the WWF (Both controlled or related to the Bilderberg Group and internationalists). They approve of occultist Helena Blavatsky when she embraced extremists views on races, etc. It's a disinformation film that won't even expose Secet Societies like the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Skulls and Bones. The destruction of mainstream religion to promote a new order in the world is exactly what numerous elitists want. Zeitgeist follows the exact goals and plans of the people they supposedly condemn. Zeitgiest II's trailer (the 2nd edition comes in October of 2008) admitted that they want to change human conscienceness. They refuse to expose the New Age Movement being apart of the new world order agenda (as promoted by the elite), because their views are blatantly pro-New Age.
By Timothy
July 29, 2008