Sunday, January 31, 2010
New Trailer for Kevin Booth’s “How Weed Won The West”
http://www.infowars.com/new-trailer-for-kevin-booths-how-weed-won-the-west/
Note by Me: I don't agree with all in the link, but I don't agree with the present Drug war at all.
By Timothy
Note by Me: I don't agree with all in the link, but I don't agree with the present Drug war at all.
By Timothy
Nixon Talks About LBJ's Taping System
Former President Richard Nixon tells a story involving Lyndon Johnson and secret tapes. (From C-Span Radio)
______________________
Outtakes, audio with RFK talking about Johnson. He characterizes him as an mean,bitter, ambitious animal. "He is able to eat people up"
Phone conversation between them, where Robert Kennedy is talking to Johnson about false reports of him (RFK) leading a coup to overthrow the government. Johnson denies knowing or about it or having received any.
Short segment with Richard Nixon and what Johnson told him about how he felt about John and Robert Kennedy
__________________________________
Barofsky’s Winding Road and Fast Car to Economic Disaster
From http://www.infowars.com/barofskys-winding-road-and-fast-car-to-economic-disaster/
Barofsky’s Winding Road and Fast Car to Economic Disaster
Text size
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
January 31, 2010
According to Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the so-called trouble asset relief program, the bankster bailout will ensure the destruction of the economy. “The government’s response to the financial meltdown has made it more likely the United States will face a deeper crisis in the future, an independent watchdog at the Treasury Department warned,” reports the Associated Press.
Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the so-called trouble asset relief program.
“Even if TARP saved our financial system from driving off a cliff back in 2008, absent meaningful reform, we are still driving on the same winding mountain road, but this time in a faster car,” Barofsky writes in a quarterly report to Congress that was released today.
TARP was not designed to save the economy. It was designed to nudge it over Barofsky’s cliff. It has increased the size of large banks. Barofsky said the banks still have an incentive to take on risk because they know the government will save them rather than bring down the financial system.
Barofsky also warned that the government and the bankster cartel known as the Federal Reserve are working to create yet another housing bubble. Over the past year, the federal government has spent hundreds of billions propping up the housing market. About 90 percent of home loans are backed by government controlled entities, mainly Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration, according to the Associated Press.
How did the Fed and the banksters do this? By directly manipulating the money supply. Earlier this month a survey of economists by The Wall Street Journal revealed that low interest rates were responsible for the housing bubble that eventually affected the economy.
Low interest rates and so-called “easy money” resulted in an epidemic of high-risk loans, the derivatives trade, and irrational speculation. If you watch the financial news programs or read The New York Times, you might believe all of this was simply the result of greed in absence of meaningful regulation and oversight. In fact, the Federal Reserve’s policy of manipulating the supply of funny fiat money and thus artificially creating speculative bubbles is part of a plan to crash the world economy.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
In May of 2009, intrepid Bilderberg sleuths Daniel Estulin and Jim Tucker reported on a plan to bring about an economic crash. Information leaked from the Bilderberg meeting that year revealed a plan to undertake either “a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline and poverty… or an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.”
The Great Bubble Machine (as Matt Taibbi calls it) is the preferred method of taking down the economy and preparing the way for fire sales and bankster and transnational corporate consolidation. “From now on, depressions will be scientifically created,” remarked Congressman Charles Lindbergh in 1913 after the Federal Reserve was established in the dead of night during Christmas.
In order for all of this to be successful the sheeple will of course need to be deceived. On the Bilderberg agenda in 2009 was a plan to “continue to deceive millions of savers and investors who believe the hype about the supposed up-turn in the economy. They are about to be set up for massive losses and searing financial pain in the months ahead.”
Obama’s glowing State of the Union was part of this insidiously crafted deception. In one fell swoop, Obama turned the bankster bailout gimmick into a jobs program. “The illusion will tear apart soon enough, and the world will come to realize that the crisis we have gone through thus far is merely the introductory chapter to the economic crisis as it will be written in history books,” warns Andrew Gavin Marshall.
“The biggest financial bubble in history is being inflated in plain sight,” Gerald Celente noted last year. The emerging Bailout Bubble “is the Mother of All Bubbles,” he said. It will be a coup de grâce for the global economy when it bursts.
At the end of March of 2009, Bloomberg reported that the “U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have spent, lent or committed $12.8 trillion, an amount that approaches the value of everything produced in the country last year.” This “works out to $42,105 for every man, woman and child in the U.S. and 14 times the $899.8 billion of currency in circulation. The nation’s gross domestic product was $14.2 trillion in 2008.”
By July of 2009, this figure had doubled. Barofsky was a bit more modest. In testimony before Congress, he said the figure may reach $23.7 trillion dollars.
Either way we are headed for a cliff in a speeding car, as the mid-mannered special inspector general warns in his report.
Congress is clueless. Last week the grand wizard of this impending crash was reappointed to the Federal Reserve.
The international banksters now have a green light to proceed.
Research related links
Globalization: The Long and Winding Road
Economic crisis has put the world “on the road to serious social instability”
Fed Inspector General Claims She Does Not Know Where Trillions Went
Obama’s Economic Plan a “Road to Hell”
Exclusive Conversation With Ron Paul: The Future Of The Federal Reserve
Obama Faces an Economic Disaster
Fed downgrades economic forecast for this year
How Did America Fall So Fast?
Campaign Warns Of “Economic Disaster” If Climate Policies Are Followed
The U.S. Economic Meltdown Continues
Bernanke fearmongers that Fed audit would be ‘takeover’ by Congress, trigger economic collapse
The Economic Crisis and What Must be Done
Barofsky’s Winding Road and Fast Car to Economic Disaster
Text size
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
January 31, 2010
According to Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the so-called trouble asset relief program, the bankster bailout will ensure the destruction of the economy. “The government’s response to the financial meltdown has made it more likely the United States will face a deeper crisis in the future, an independent watchdog at the Treasury Department warned,” reports the Associated Press.
Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the so-called trouble asset relief program.
“Even if TARP saved our financial system from driving off a cliff back in 2008, absent meaningful reform, we are still driving on the same winding mountain road, but this time in a faster car,” Barofsky writes in a quarterly report to Congress that was released today.
TARP was not designed to save the economy. It was designed to nudge it over Barofsky’s cliff. It has increased the size of large banks. Barofsky said the banks still have an incentive to take on risk because they know the government will save them rather than bring down the financial system.
Barofsky also warned that the government and the bankster cartel known as the Federal Reserve are working to create yet another housing bubble. Over the past year, the federal government has spent hundreds of billions propping up the housing market. About 90 percent of home loans are backed by government controlled entities, mainly Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration, according to the Associated Press.
How did the Fed and the banksters do this? By directly manipulating the money supply. Earlier this month a survey of economists by The Wall Street Journal revealed that low interest rates were responsible for the housing bubble that eventually affected the economy.
Low interest rates and so-called “easy money” resulted in an epidemic of high-risk loans, the derivatives trade, and irrational speculation. If you watch the financial news programs or read The New York Times, you might believe all of this was simply the result of greed in absence of meaningful regulation and oversight. In fact, the Federal Reserve’s policy of manipulating the supply of funny fiat money and thus artificially creating speculative bubbles is part of a plan to crash the world economy.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
In May of 2009, intrepid Bilderberg sleuths Daniel Estulin and Jim Tucker reported on a plan to bring about an economic crash. Information leaked from the Bilderberg meeting that year revealed a plan to undertake either “a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline and poverty… or an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.”
The Great Bubble Machine (as Matt Taibbi calls it) is the preferred method of taking down the economy and preparing the way for fire sales and bankster and transnational corporate consolidation. “From now on, depressions will be scientifically created,” remarked Congressman Charles Lindbergh in 1913 after the Federal Reserve was established in the dead of night during Christmas.
In order for all of this to be successful the sheeple will of course need to be deceived. On the Bilderberg agenda in 2009 was a plan to “continue to deceive millions of savers and investors who believe the hype about the supposed up-turn in the economy. They are about to be set up for massive losses and searing financial pain in the months ahead.”
Obama’s glowing State of the Union was part of this insidiously crafted deception. In one fell swoop, Obama turned the bankster bailout gimmick into a jobs program. “The illusion will tear apart soon enough, and the world will come to realize that the crisis we have gone through thus far is merely the introductory chapter to the economic crisis as it will be written in history books,” warns Andrew Gavin Marshall.
“The biggest financial bubble in history is being inflated in plain sight,” Gerald Celente noted last year. The emerging Bailout Bubble “is the Mother of All Bubbles,” he said. It will be a coup de grâce for the global economy when it bursts.
At the end of March of 2009, Bloomberg reported that the “U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have spent, lent or committed $12.8 trillion, an amount that approaches the value of everything produced in the country last year.” This “works out to $42,105 for every man, woman and child in the U.S. and 14 times the $899.8 billion of currency in circulation. The nation’s gross domestic product was $14.2 trillion in 2008.”
By July of 2009, this figure had doubled. Barofsky was a bit more modest. In testimony before Congress, he said the figure may reach $23.7 trillion dollars.
Either way we are headed for a cliff in a speeding car, as the mid-mannered special inspector general warns in his report.
Congress is clueless. Last week the grand wizard of this impending crash was reappointed to the Federal Reserve.
The international banksters now have a green light to proceed.
Research related links
Globalization: The Long and Winding Road
Economic crisis has put the world “on the road to serious social instability”
Fed Inspector General Claims She Does Not Know Where Trillions Went
Obama’s Economic Plan a “Road to Hell”
Exclusive Conversation With Ron Paul: The Future Of The Federal Reserve
Obama Faces an Economic Disaster
Fed downgrades economic forecast for this year
How Did America Fall So Fast?
Campaign Warns Of “Economic Disaster” If Climate Policies Are Followed
The U.S. Economic Meltdown Continues
Bernanke fearmongers that Fed audit would be ‘takeover’ by Congress, trigger economic collapse
The Economic Crisis and What Must be Done
Replacement Theology Annihilated!
'
This was filmed at 5am today and the following Scripture came to my mind almost straightaway:
"Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the MOON and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name: If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever." (Jer. 31:35-37)
This was filmed at 5am today and the following Scripture came to my mind almost straightaway:
"Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the MOON and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name: If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever." (Jer. 31:35-37)
Saturday, January 30, 2010
2010: The New Decade and a New Era Part 5
Virginia Politics
Politics can be a competitive and sometimes a cut throat reality. Happiness and bitterness envelop participants in the tough world of American politics. Virginia is a place whose American political history have spanned long centuries even in the days when solely Native Americans resided inside of the North American continent back spanning thousands of years. Political arrangements crystallized among the Powanthan tribes and the rest of the Virginia Algonquian Native American confederacy. They lived in Eastern Virginia. Patrick Henry was a famous political figure who said "Give me Liberty or Give me Death" in a church in advancing the Revolutionary War. Patrick Henry denounced the British utilizing America as a colonial enterprise. Thomas Jefferson participated in the early Virginian government as well. I don't agree with him on every issue of course. Jefferson legitimately proscribed to the concepts of individual liberty & religious freedom, which in this modern age are enshrined in the confines of the American government (including the State government of Virginia). Political changes came in Virginia after the Civil War in America. Most African American males were given the right to vote. The Readjuster Party came about in the 1970's. This party is made up of a coalition of Conservative Democrats, Republicans and African Americans. This group was assembled and the Readjuster Party took power for about 10 years. The Democrats regained the state legislature at 1883 when the Readjuster Party lost control of Virginia politics. The Democrats use a statue and a new constitution in 1901. The provisions in these 2 items had evil policies in them like a poll tax, residency requirements, and a literacy test to disfranchise most African Americans and even some poor whites. This disfranchisement continued until after the passage of civil rights legislation in the mid-1960's. Many white Democrats create an one party state with nearly unchallenged majority of state and most federal offices through the middle of the 20th century. The Byrd Organization was headed by Harry F. Byrd Sr. The Byrd Organization was headed by Harry F. Byrd Sr. in order rule the political establishment in Virginia. African Americans and other Americans have protest and fought for the Civil Rights Act of 1965 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Virginia was friendly to Republicans in the nation level more in the 1960's. Some conservatives in Virginia went against the Democratic Party, because of President Lyndon Johnson's passage of civil rights legislation. Virginia's GOP back then was more moderate back in the 1960's and the 1970's. Virginia elected the moderate Republican A. Linwood Holton Jr. in 1970. He was the first Republican Governor in the 20th century, which ended the influence of the Byrd Organization. Other more conservative Governors came in Virginia which was former Democrat Mills Godwin and Jim Gilmore. The famous Senator John Warner and Congressman Tom Davis exemplified the moderate/conservative tendencies of Virginia Republicans. Democrats were Governors from 1982 to 1994. Chuck Robb was elected Governor in 1981 being and Gerald L. Baliles was elected in 1985 as Governor. In 1989, Douglas Wilder was elected Governor of Virginia. This was historical, because Douglas Wilder was Virginia's first African American Governor in history. By 2001, Virginia elected Mark Warner as Governor and in 2005 Tim Kaine was Governor of Virginia. He was once Lt. Governor in 2005.
Virginia voted for a Republican in every election since 1952 except for the Democratic landslide in President Johnson's election in 1968 and Virginia voted for Barack Obama in 2008. Virginia's former streak of voting for Republicans in 10 consecutive Presidential election (from 1968 to 2004) began with Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy. Virginia was the only state to vote for Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter in 1976. Today, Virginia is experiencing rapid and constant political changes. Virginia was the state that voted for Barack Obama during the 2008 Presidential election. Virginia didn't vote for a Democratic Presidential candidate since Lyndon Baines Johnson. The 2 present Senators of Virginia are Jim Webb and Mark Warner.
Jim Gilmore and Mark Warner are surely the representation of people who are right on many things and I disagree with them on other issues. These 2 men represent different philosophies that are common in Virginia. Jim Gilmore was a famous Governor who lead from 1998 until 2002. He created the SOL or the Standards of Learning reforms in Virginia's public school. During his term, Virginia's public school students's scores increases on these state tests as well as nationally normed tests. Gilmore is known as promoting the controversial no car tax and other reducing taxes plans. This occurred around the time near and at 9/11. Gilmore increased funding for adoption services and supported a waiting period plus partial birth abortion ban. Today, Gilmore aligns with the Republican Party, the Department of Homeland Security (which is an authoritarian group that wants to violate civil liberties of American citizens), and is a political commentator on FOX News. Mark Warner once was Governor and was very popular since he was a moderate and caused the state to be rated A- by the Government Performance Project in conjunction with the Governing magazine (along with the Pew Charitable Trust) in a 2 year study. He was famous for being involved in the telecommunications venture capital. He was a Congressional staff and a Democratic Party fundraiser in the 1980's. Mark Warner calls Virginia "The best managed state in the nation." In 2009, Virginia recently elected a Republican Governor named Bob McDonnell. He replaced the previous Governor of Tim Kaine. The reason that Bob McDonnell was elected was because of the hostility toward the Democratic establishment and the Democratic candidate Craig Deids didn't have much name recognition around Virginia (and his campaign wasn't that aggressive). Politically, Hampton Roads is mixed with Republicans and Democrats strongly represented in region. I'm from Hampton Roads. The Richmond region is mostly Democratic and Northern Virginia is definitely mostly Democratic & liberal as well. Western Virginia is made up of mostly conservatives and Republicans. There are exceptions to these descriptions of course.
By Timothy
2010: The New Decade & the New Era Part 4
Historical Notes on Religion
The story of Christianity begins with the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth. The time frame was exactly in the time of Augustus. It's tied up with the Roman Empire from the start. Jesus was a prophetfrom Galilee, which is the Northern province of the Roman called area of Palestine (or exactly Israel). The Romans ruled their Empire over lands, but they usually didn't interfere with the local governments. Israel was difficult to rule since the people to the Romans were stiffnecked and found them strange, etc. Some Jewish people talked about how God was more powerful than their false gods, which is true. The Roman Empire didn't concern themselves with the religious mores of the people unless when it caused trouble for them. Jesus wasn't encouraging Jewish people to overthrow the Roman Empire by violence, but change their lives and be worthy of his support. God the Father, who could be firm to help his people (of Jews and Gentiles) showed his love by sending his Son to the world. Jesus said that the Kingdom of God wasn't of this world. Jesus Christ focues more so on the spiritual kingdom and he formed the New Covenant. The New covenant wanted people to love one another and promoted the belief that all men are your brothers and sisters. The poor and the downtrodden loved this message. Most of the wealth back then was amogn the aristocracy. This was frustrating the rabbis (of the Pharisee sect, primarily the educated but not aristocratic rulers of Israel), because Jesus Christ's followers were calling him the Messiah and restorer of the Jewish people. The Pharisees refused to call him the Messiah and believed that he was a false prophet. The Pharisees had to convince the Sanhedrin (or the Judges) that Jesus was a threat. The Sanhedrin acted like they were conservative and criticized Jesus. The Romans via Pontius Pilate were convinced to kill Jesus Christ as an insurrectionist when he wasn't. Jesus was innocent of the charges and was mocked as the "King of the Jews." After Jesus Christ's death and resurrection, Christianity spread like wildfire. The reason is that the resurrection was a cornerstone of the faith and many witness in the 1st century saw Jesus after his resurrection and before his ascenion into Heaven to be with God the Father. Paul of Tarsus was a Jewish person of the Benjamin tribe. He persecuted Christians until he had a religious visions from Jesus Christ asking why is he persecuting him (and his believers). Paul was blinded and became the Apostle Paul. He converted to Christianity and was on route to Damascus. Easily, Paul was one of the greatest missionaries in religious history. Paul is the common figure in quoting Christian doctrine. He believed that the Messiah came to Earth for the benefit of all people. He led converts in Asia Minor, Greece, Italy, and other places. Peter and Paul died at the hands of the Romans under the Emperor Nero.
Religious History is something to learn. Christianity in Britain existed for a long time. Christians spread as far as Britain as early as the 2nd century A.D. It was about A.D. 200 that Tertullian wrote thus: "Parts of Britain were inaccessible to the Romans but have yielded to Christ." Christianity spread fast from Israel into Alexandria, Greece, Asi, North Africa, Gaul, and England. Christians in the UK converted the Druids. The Druids were pagans worshipping idols and Nature with human sacrifices even. Diocletian had his savage Christian persecution in the 3rd century A.D. Some martyrs under the region of Emperor Diocletian include At. Albans, Aaron, and Julius of Caerloen. Later, apostate Christianity from Rome came into the UK by the 500's A.D. in a serious level. In the Middle Ages, Christians believed in God and faced persecuted by the Roman Catholic Church.
The Reformation had an interesting history in it of itself. The Reformation tried to do the right thing, but some Protestants in the Reformation were infiltrated by Rosicrucians and they didn't totally separate themselves from the Papacy. That's a historical fact. The Protestant Reformation certainly made great contributions in our society, yet even all of the Protestants weren't perfect. I don't believe in one extreme saying that all of the Protestants were influenced by the Rosicurians (having little benefit for the human race) or the other extreme saying that the Protestants were all loving and all tolerant of differing religious points of view. The truth is in between those 2 extremes. You have to acknowledge much of the political and religious liberty we enjoy in America proceeded in great measure from the Reformation. Although, many Protestants have made contributions in history that I do respect from taking religious plus political liberties to another level, etc.. A desire for reform in the Catholic Church came from within that apostate church. Indulgences, ignorance by priests, the banning of the common man to read or write the Bible in his or her own tongue, and other abuses came about. Erasmus in his work taught was Jesus was the role model in which Christians should act like. Catholicism breaks with Martin Luther later. Luther was a very serious professing CHirstian that tried to lead Christian reforms. Luther was apart of Germany. He was brillant as a young scholar and he was already teaching at Wittenburg in his mid 20's. He taught theology to monks. He was an Augustinian monk of the Strict Observance in a Germany monastery. The Strict Observance is the name given by Baron von Hund, which is apart of Freemasonry. When Martin Luther had a religious experience in finding out that salvation was by grace through faith not by works. Pope Leo X's indulgences (or people paying taxes to the Roman Catholic Church for salvation or elimination from purgatory, which is a heresy) caused Luther extreme angry. The reason is that indulgences was a form of bribery to benefit the Papacy in order to create building projects, etc. Luther rejected the Pope being the Vicar of Christ. According to a report written by Philipp Melanchthon, Luther posted the Ninety-Five Theses at the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany on October 31, 1517. The Prince of Wittenberg agreed with Luther. Pope Leo X responded by excommunicating Martin Luther and the Prince. From then now, Luther's life was in danger and Catholics wanted to kill him. This caused Lutheranism to be formed. John Calvin was another reformer. He fled from France into Switzerland. He denied the real presence physically in communion (disagreeing with Luther and the Pope on this issue). He was once apart of the University of Paris. In Geneva, Calvin formed his government. John Calvin promoted many biblical truths and made errors especially inside of his theocracy of Geneva. John Calvin believed in Augustine's version of predestination. Anabaptists were persecuted by both Protestants and Catholics, because they believe that all men are equals, that only believing adults recieve baptism (as the Bible says), there is no complex heirachy in the church, and that church & state should be seperated. Scholars believe that Anabaptists lead into the development of the Quakers, Memmonites, etc. Anabaptists influenced the Baptists, but the Baptists came from the English Separtatism Movement. Roger Williams and John Clarke formed early Baptists churches. Each man desired to promote religious freedom. Baptists reject infant baptism as I do.
Rome responded to the Reformation by forming the Counter-Reformation, which was evil. The Catholic Church wanted to respond to the challenges of the teachings. The One of the earliest responses in the Counter Reformation was the Council of Trent, which was supported by the Jesuits. The Jesuits were leaders in the Counter-Reformation. They are group of priests that acted as a military group of people to promote Catholicism and attempted to destroy Protestantism. The Jesuits was created by the soldier named Ignatius Loyola in 1540 A.D. He was from Spain and got injured in battle. Later, he claimed that a vision via a trance came unto him to fight for his faith. Loyola came to the Emperor and the Pope sanctions his order. The Jesuit trained for battle physically and through other means. The Jesuits would send agents into universities, religious schools, government, etc. all over Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia in order to promote the Vatican's agenda of global domination (which trying to crush the influence of Protestants & Baptists in the world stage). The following is a recorded, bloody Jesuit order, which is similar to Freemasonry's bloody oaths:
"...The Jesuit Oath mentions the following:
(The Superior speaks:)
My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a Reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant; and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope. You have been taught to plant insidiously the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and to incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace; to take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means. You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope's sake, whose servants we are unto death. You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labours with the blood of the heretic; for "without the shedding of blood no man can be saved"..." (Journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd Session, of the United States Congressional Record (House Calendar No. 397, Report No. 1523, 15 February, 1913, pp. 3215-3216) (European Institute of Protestant Studies)
There has been evil, illegitimate attacks against the Reformation (like saying everyone in it were wrong or Rosicrucians) and legitimate critiques of it. These legitimate critiques deal with the reality that some in the Reformation movement (not all of it) could of been infiltrated by the Rosicurians. The Rosicurcians were hated by the Roman Catholic Church, but believed in the heresies of spiritual alchemy, spiritual contact, and other forms of occultism. Barbara Aho has written on this even though she is wrong to believe that the Priory de Sion still exists today and her constant Jewish baiting rhetoric. The truth is that Secret Societies , New Agers, etc. have used apostate Christianity to promote an evolutionary and global religious system as admitted by Anne Besant in her own words: "...If these teachings be regained, their influence will soon be seen in wider and deeper views of truth; dogmas, which now seem like mere shells and fetters, shall again be seen to partial presentments of fundamental realities. First, Esoteric Christianity will reappear in the ‘Holy Place’, in the Temple so that all who are capable of receiving it may follow its lines of published thought; and secondly, Occult Christianity will again descend into the adytum, dwelling behind the veil which guards the ‘Holy of Holies’, into which only the Initiate may enter…” (Annie Besant, Esoteric Christianity, pp. 26-7).
Debate rages whether Martin Luther was a Rosicrucian or not. Some believe this and some don't. People say that his coat of arms has the Rosicurcian emblems on them with the Rose, cross, and a circle around it. The truth is that the seal was designed for Luther at the behest of Prince John Frederick in 1530. Luther wrote of the seal as representative of his theology and faith. You shouldn't compare God to a seal, but many other seals relate to German locations not just Rosicrucianism. There is no doubt that this seal has occult symbolism (the rose looks like the feminine principle or the Pentagram. The Pentagram in the occult represents Isis, Venus, or the perfected man). Some believe that Martin Luther praised alchemy. If he did do that, he was wrong of course. Johann Valentin Andreae, a Lutheran pastor and mystic, worked at Tubingen University. Andreae's personal coat-of-arms, like Martin Luther's includes the ROSE and CROSS motif. There has been no conclusive evidence that Martin Luther was a Rosicrucian or a member of any Secret Society though. What is true is that many Freemasons infiltrated Lutherans, Southern Baptists, and other apostate Protestants (as opposed to real Bible believing Protestants and Baptists), but real Christians have rejected Secret Societies strongly for many years. Aho promotes the lie that John Calvin was completely Jewish (as citing words form the words form the Masonic B'nai B'rith Lodge meeting). He wasn't Jewish, but was a Frenchmen. Calvin's father was a French man named Gérard Cauvin, and his mother was named Jeanne le Franc. Aho is right to point out the John Calvin made political and theological errors though. So, Aho is slick with her deceptions.
Troy and others certainly inspired me to take a second look at the great Geneva Bible. After much research, the Geneva Bible should be given much more respect than it is presently in 2010. The Geneva Bible is one of the most historically significant Bibles in history. It was the main Bible for the 16th and part of the 17th centuries of the Protestant Movement. It has been used by Oliver Cromwell, John Milton, John Knox, John Bunyan, and others. John Bunyan wrote the famous book of "Pilgrim's Progress." The Geneva was the first English Bible with a study guide, adis, and other verse citations to make the reader understand the Bible in an efficient manner. Also, you can cross refence verses with commentaries as well. THe language of the Geneva Bible was clear cut. It was favored over the Bishops's Bible. William Whittingham supervised the plan to create the Geneva Bible from Geneva, Switzerland. They weren't in England at that time, because the reign of Queen Mary I of England(who regin from 1553 to 1558) prosecuted anyone who wasn't a Catholic. She was called bloody Mary. Other translators were Myles Coverdale, Christoperher Goodman, Anthony Gilby, Thomas Sampson, and Willian Cole. Whittingham was directly responsible for the New Testament while Gilby oversaw the Old Testament. The full edition of the Bible with a revised NT came about in 1560. It was printed in whole in 1576. The first Bible printed in Scotland was the Geneva Bible in 1579. The Geneva Bible was translated from the Greek Textus Receptus manuscripts and the Hebrew texts. There is the 1599 modern edition of the Geneva Bible as well. Most of the New Testament in the Geneva Bible came from translations from William Tyndale as well. The Geneva Bible was innnovative in being the first Bible to have verse numbers, which were based on the work of Stephanus or Robert Estienne of Paris. Pilgrims coming into Plymouth used the Geneva version of the Bible. King James didn't like the Geneva Bible since it had Calvinistic leanings. He also frowned on what he considered to be seditious marginal notes on key political texts. A marginal note for Exodus 1:9 indicated that the Hebrew midwives were correct in disobeying the Egyptian king's orders, and a note for 2 Chronicles 15:16 said that King Asa should have had his mother executed and not merely deposed for the crime of worshipping an idol. The King James Version of the Bible grew out of the king's distaste for these brief but potent doctrinal commentaries. He considered the marginal notes to be a political threat to his kingdom. Rome especially didn't like it since it was very much outspokenly anti-Roman Catholic doctrine, which it ought to be. Rome was still persecuting Protestants in the sixteenth century. Keep in mind that the English translators were exiles from a nation that was returning to the Catholic faith under a queen who was burning Protestants at the stake. I respect the King James version of the Bible and I respect the Geneva Bible, but it's very clear that the KJV-Only philosophy (which I define as believing that we should use only KJV for studying religion in the Bible without studying the original languages, etc.) is a Jesuitical tool of Counter Reformation in order to bash the Textus Receptus script (and distract from the real history of Bible along with the promotion of the fraudulent Alexandrian texts). This is precisely why the Geneva Bible is hated by many quarters today. The Geneva Bible was very popular in the 1500's and the 1600's. The UK was the base of the Textus Receptus English translation of the Holy Bible from the Tyndale Bible to the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. Even bloody Mary murdered numerous Christians because they rejected transubtantiaton and other false doctrines.
The most famous House of Stuart King was King James I of England. His mother was the controversial Mary, Queen of Scotland. King James was the King of England, and Ireland from 1603 to 1625. King James I wasn't perfect, but peace and low taxation existed in his reign. King James lived in the peak of the Jacobean Era. He authorized the existed of the King James Version of the Bible, which is a very accurate Bible to this day. It was published in 1611. There was a draft to create a new version of the Bible during the reign of Queen Elizabeth (who reigned from 1558 to 1603). The draft begins by saying that: “…An act for the reducinge of diversities of Bibles now extant in the Englishe tongue to one setled vulgar translated from the originall." After the Hampton Conference of January of 1604, the idea for the KJV was created. In the 2nd day of the Conference, Puritan Dr. John Rainolds (1549-1607) called for a new translation of the Bible. The creators of the KJV were extremely scholarly men. Dr. Lancelot Andrews help create the King James Bible. Dr. Andrews mastered 15 languages. Dr. William Bedwell was another translator of the KJV. He new Arabic manuscripts, he studied in Cambridge, and other things. He also began a Persian dictionary which is among Archbishop Laud's manuscripts, still preserved in the Bodleian Library at Oxford today. Dr. Miles Smith was an expert in Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriac, and Arabic. Dr. Smith went through the Greek and Latin early church leaders and made annotations on them all. Even John Bois was an expert in Hebrew and Greek. He studied at his father's knee, and at the age of 5, he read the whole Bible in Hebrew. He could write Hebrew in a clear and elegant style by age of six. Dr. William Goode was a translator at the translator committee. Goode was a scholar and knew German, French, Hebrew, and Greek. Mr. Goode in his sermon on the Last Supper (which was published by the Westiminster Reformed Press) said that “liquor is the devil’s drink of deception…” The KJV has also been called the Authorized version.
The most famous House of Stuart King was King James I of England. His mother was the controversial Mary, Queen of Scotland. King James was the King of England, and Ireland from 1603 to 1625. King James I wasn't perfect, but peace and low taxation existed in his reign. King James lived in the peak of the Jacobean Era. He authorized the existed of the King James Version of the Bible, which is a very accurate Bible to this day. It was published in 1611. There was a draft to create a new version of the Bible during the reign of Queen Elizabeth (who reigned from 1558 to 1603). The draft begins by saying that: “…An act for the reducinge of diversities of Bibles now extant in the Englishe tongue to one setled vulgar translated from the originall." After the Hampton Conference of January of 1604, the idea for the KJV was created. In the 2nd day of the Conference, Puritan Dr. John Rainolds (1549-1607) called for a new translation of the Bible. The creators of the KJV were extremely scholarly men. Dr. Lancelot Andrews help create the King James Bible. Dr. Andrews mastered 15 languages. Dr. William Bedwell was another translator of the KJV. He new Arabic manuscripts, he studied in Cambridge, and other things. He also began a Persian dictionary which is among Archbishop Laud's manuscripts, still preserved in the Bodleian Library at Oxford today. Dr. Miles Smith was an expert in Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriac, and Arabic. Dr. Smith went through the Greek and Latin early church leaders and made annotations on them all. Even John Bois was an expert in Hebrew and Greek. He studied at his father's knee, and at the age of 5, he read the whole Bible in Hebrew. He could write Hebrew in a clear and elegant style by age of six. Dr. William Goode was a translator at the translator committee. Goode was a scholar and knew German, French, Hebrew, and Greek. Mr. Goode in his sermon on the Last Supper (which was published by the Westiminster Reformed Press) said that “liquor is the devil’s drink of deception…” The KJV has also been called the Authorized version.
Today in 2010, the Counter Reformation never stopped among the Vatican elite. This movement still transpires it. Evidence of this is how the Roman Catholic Church supports the Ecumenical Movement, the European Union, and the Emergent Movement. The Emergent Movement is placing experiences and other mystical devices above faith in God in trying to permit a real spiritual connection with God. It's common among the new generation. The European Union or an unified European political, economic entity have been a brainchild of the Vatican for centuries. One example is how the Vatican's Holy Roman Empire desired an unified Europe under the authority of the Pope. Even today, the recent Catholic convert Tony Blair supports Interfaith dialogue and Ecumenicalism.
By Timothy
2010: The New Decade & the New Era Part 3
Religion and Spirituality Part 3
There is nothing wrong with embracing real religion. There is certainly nothing wrong with doing the right thing in trying to improve ones life spiritually indeed (True spirituality is definitely a mechanism that can assist folks to cope with the issues surrounding the existence of life). Real spirituality can be blessing to inspire lives to have a real connection with God. We all need to love God and love all people (both male and female) as equals. Loving your neighbor as yourself is an authentic commandment all of us should live by. That means don't talk disrespectful language to anyone. That means helping people if they need assistance in life. That means living by the righteous words that proceeds out of the mouth and word of God Almighty. The problem arises when religion is exploited to promote false doctrines or when someone use it formethodological, illegitimate means (in order to control people in an immoral way). The Blasphemy by TBN is very common place. Now, for years religious people have legitimately exposed TBN or Trinity Broadcasting Network. Paul Crouch is the leader of it and he doesn't want even legitimate exposure of his heretical ideas. He calls Christians contending for the faith in exposing fraud as "heresy hunters." He said that: "Heretic hunters, those guys who spend their lives straightening us all out doctrinally, they are going to go straight to hell." That's a lie since the Bible promote real discernment and contending for the faith in the world. Crouch can control his network and the numerous messages proceeding from it, which is sent to millions of people. Yet, he refuses correction which is against what the Bible says: "...Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die." [Prov 15:10]. Paul Crouch and Kenneth Copeland define faith as similar to a spiritual force or a force. Faith isn't a force. God uses faith and faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen. God is the total Sovereign God, who is the author of our faith and is our assurance. Kenneth Copeland blasphemes God on many times and called God the biggest failure in the Bible. He said to Paul Crouch that: "...He lost His top ranking of His most anointed angel, the first man He ever created, the first woman He ever created, the whole earth and all the fullness therein, a third of the angels at least. That's a big loss, man! I mean, you figure up all of that, that's a lot of real estate, gone down the drain. Now, the reason you don't think of God as a failure, He never said He's a failure. (Paul Crouch and others laughing on the set.) And you are not a failure until you say you are one."
That's false since a failure is when you don't reach a certain standard set beforehand. God isn't a failure since he gave Adam and Eve a choice between eating the tree of the fruit or not. Adam and Eve made an error by eating the fruit and punishment was exacted unto them by their own accord, which it wasn't God's fault. Additionally, God isn't a failure since he saves humans all of the time in his Word and deed. Copeland believes that Jesus was only human in his earthly visit and that he was only Divine when he came into Hell. That's false since Jesus redemped the souls of men by the time of the Cross not in Hell. Of course in the Praise the Lord Show, Paul Crouch, Benny Hinn, and Kenneth Copeland call themselves a little gods in this dialogue:
"...Paul Crouch: "He doesn't ever draw a distinction between himself." (Jan Crouch agrees in the background.)
Kenneth Copeland: "Never, never. You never can do that in a covenant relationship."
Paul Crouch: "You know what else that settles then tonight. This hue and cry and controversy that has been spawned by the devil to try and bring dissent within the body of Christ that we are gods. I am a little god."
Kenneth Copeland: "Yes, yes!"
Paul Crouch: "I have His name. I'm one with Him. I'm in a covenant relationship. I am a little god."
Kenneth Copeland: "Critic, you are anything that He is."
Paul Crouch (heard under the worth of Kenneth Copeland): "Critic, be gone."
Paul Crouch: "Yes!"..." Many others in the World Faith Movement crowd promote this lie of man being God or gods. Here are other quotes from them (including Mormons) speaking in these terms:
Kenneth Copeland: "Never, never. You never can do that in a covenant relationship."
Paul Crouch: "You know what else that settles then tonight. This hue and cry and controversy that has been spawned by the devil to try and bring dissent within the body of Christ that we are gods. I am a little god."
Kenneth Copeland: "Yes, yes!"
Paul Crouch: "I have His name. I'm one with Him. I'm in a covenant relationship. I am a little god."
Kenneth Copeland: "Critic, you are anything that He is."
Paul Crouch (heard under the worth of Kenneth Copeland): "Critic, be gone."
Paul Crouch: "Yes!"..." Many others in the World Faith Movement crowd promote this lie of man being God or gods. Here are other quotes from them (including Mormons) speaking in these terms:
"...Adam walked into God's class. Adam did things in the class of gods… All right, are we gods? we are a class of gods.” (Kenneth Copeland “Praise the Lord” (TBN), recorded 2/5/86)
“Adam was the god of this world.” (The Believer's Authority, 2d ed. Kenneth Hagin Ministries, 1991], 19.)
“Though we are not Almighty God Himself, nevertheless, we are now divine” (Benny Hinn, TBN, 12/1/90)
“I am a little messiah walking on earth,..... You are a little god on earth running around (Benny Hinn Praise-a-Thon TBN, Nov. 6 1990)
“in each of us is the potentiality to become a God” (Spencer W. Kimbal President of Mormon church Salt Lake Tribune, October 7, 1974).
“The Father begets; the Son is begotten; they are Parent and Child; Sire and Son look alike, so much so that they are the express image of each other's persons. (Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon apostle Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, Vol.3, p.138).
Satanists, New Agers like the woman J. Z. Knight, and some Masons believe that they are a little god, god, or God. This is a false view that Satan told Adam and Eve in Genesis 3:5. The Bible says that man can't be like God in divinity at all. Isaiah 45:5-6 mentions that: “...I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else..." All humans came from God as his Creation (in his image or likeness) not as divine beigns. Copeland of course believes in the occult heresy that God was a androgynous being in his own words: "...Then, he created Eve out of Adam. Now, actually God didn't name her Eve, Adam named her Eve later. That wasn't her name, her name was Adam-Adam. When God said Adam, they both came. Their authority was one and the same together. They did everything together. They had always been together. Even when she was still part of him, he was as much female as he was male, LIKE GOD IS. And God separated the female part of him and then put them back together. And she was Adam, they were Adam. He was the man, she was the woman. She was the man with the womb..." This is found in the Kabbalah, Plato (in ancient Greece, there was the cult of Hermaphroditos that praised the Greek false androgynous deity called Hermaphroditus), Aristophanes, etc. The Bible says that God is total MALE not female or androgynous. TBN allows heretics to show their tenets without even a rebuttal. One example is Phil Munsey talking about Mother Earth and respect for Buddhist doctrines. You can't mix paganism with Christian teachings. TBN is obviously an Ecumenical operation that is apart of the religious establishment sent to distract people from the simplistic Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. It's also in existence in my opinion to covertly imply that real Christians are extremists, which isn't the case at all.
Joyce Mayer is a middle aged woman and a famous preacher of the Prosperity Gospel movement like others. She is one of the top religious establishment teachers in the world. Some things that she mentions are legitimate and other parts of her teaching are errors. She is yolked with the World Faith Movement with its members like Creflo Dollar, Benny Hinn, Kim Clement, Mike Murdock, and Kenneth Copeland. Copeland's "The Believer's Voice of Victory" have some of her article. In her broadcast the first week of January 2005 she interviewed a man giving testimony to Kenneth Hagin who is known for spreading the word/faith heresy to his disciples. Joyce been through real struggles like having breast cancer and getting surgery. Joyce Mayer doesn't take legitimate criticism lighty from having a large, expensive wardrobe, teaching men plus women, and wearing jewelry. She is 60 years old now. Her ministry revenues have increased over the years. From 1998 where they took in 40 million, to 1999 they brought in 55 million, to 2000 70 million, to 2001 near 80 million, to 2002 near 90 million. Today her Life in the Word organization estimates to take in $95 million this year. The ministry says it spends about 10 percent - $880,000 a month - on charitable works around the globe. Mayer lived in a 10,000 square foot Cape Cod style estate home. It has a guest home and a garage. Joyce supports the falsehood that you have to live in wealth to experience the promised land: “I don't want to spend my whole life talking about the promised land without ever getting there. I want to live in it ”(Joyce Meyer, “What Does Your Future Hold” May 21, 2004). Meyer believes that words have spiritual power. This is a word faith doctrine. She said that: “But you cannot throw out positive confession, and you cannot throw out all the faith teachers, and you cannot throw out positive thinking. And you cannot get rid of those kinds of things because they're in the Bible from one end of it to the other.” (Joyce Meyer, PFO Quarterly Journal, April-June 2002, p. 6. Withcraft and Related Spirits, pt. 1, sides 1 and 2). Sorry, we can reject false faith teachers if they teach the lie that I need wealth to have a real spiritual connection with God. Joyce Meyer also believe in the heresy that Jesus went into Hell to save souls (as found in her 1991 edition, First Printing of her book entitled "The Most Important Decision You will Ever Make". She said that: "..,“Jesus said, ‘It is finished.’ And He meant the Old Covenant. The job He had to do was just getting started. He really did the job the three days and nights that He was in hell. That’s where the job was done” “He was pronounced guilty on the cross but He paid the price in hell.” (From the Cross to the Throne Joyce Meyer, audio tape) This teaching has been popularized from Hagin, Copeland Fred Price, Charles Capps etc. The Bible is clear that Jesus Christ went into Hell, but he didn't pay a price there. He was already victorious. He paid the price of sin from the cross.
Colossians 1:19-22 says that:"...19 For it was the Father’s good pleasure for all the fulness to dwell in Him,
20 and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say , whether things on earth or things in heaven.
21 And although you were formerly alienated and hostile in mind, engaged in evil deeds,
22 yet He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach–..."
Meyer believes that: "...“Pain is a spirit. When it gets on your body, tell it to leave” ( Joyce Meyer, From the Cross to the Throne, audio tape, sermon recorded at Life Christian Center in Saint Louis, Mo -referenced from Personal Freedom Outreach). Pain of course isn't a spirit. Pain is apart of human existence. Even Jesus Christ said that sickness and pain can be from unclean spirits and some of sickness plus pain aren't from spirits at all. She prays to God to protect her money and checkbooks. Rev. Larry Rice KNLC canceled her Sunday evening program, because he believed that Meyer existed in a lavish lifestyle. Rice said he had become increasingly worried about what he views as the “excessive lifestyle” of Meyer and her family.
He said on a Friday that the ministry's $2.5 million home in south St. Louis County where Meyer lives, and the $100,000 Mercedes-Benz owned by her husband, Dave, “crosses the line.” The pastor is right to stand for the truth. Some people like Bob Schneller were decieved by Meyer and became broke. He and his wife gave gave her - $4,400 a year - surpassed his annual mortgage payment. He and his wife lived on $30,000 a year. Bob said that they once followed the seed offering heresy of giving money to eat back more money tenfold or a hundredfold (or that if you have enough faith, you can claim it). He became divorced and problems persisted. Schneller spoke against holy laughter and Meyer told Schneller that she couldn't support him. Schneller parted ways with Meyer. He works as a security guard and attends a “regular church, where the Bible is taught verse by verse.” So, there are tons of more stories that describe the damage that false prosperity gospel have done to many people. Kurt Warner is the famous supporter of Joyce Meyer. Warner was the quarterback of the Arizona Cardinals. He even went as far as saying that preachers should be paid as high as CEOs in the millions of dollars. Kurt Warner did so some good things like inspiring people to believe in God and become inspired to develop their own lives spiritually. He recently retired form the NFL in late January 2010.
He said on a Friday that the ministry's $2.5 million home in south St. Louis County where Meyer lives, and the $100,000 Mercedes-Benz owned by her husband, Dave, “crosses the line.” The pastor is right to stand for the truth. Some people like Bob Schneller were decieved by Meyer and became broke. He and his wife gave gave her - $4,400 a year - surpassed his annual mortgage payment. He and his wife lived on $30,000 a year. Bob said that they once followed the seed offering heresy of giving money to eat back more money tenfold or a hundredfold (or that if you have enough faith, you can claim it). He became divorced and problems persisted. Schneller spoke against holy laughter and Meyer told Schneller that she couldn't support him. Schneller parted ways with Meyer. He works as a security guard and attends a “regular church, where the Bible is taught verse by verse.” So, there are tons of more stories that describe the damage that false prosperity gospel have done to many people. Kurt Warner is the famous supporter of Joyce Meyer. Warner was the quarterback of the Arizona Cardinals. He even went as far as saying that preachers should be paid as high as CEOs in the millions of dollars. Kurt Warner did so some good things like inspiring people to believe in God and become inspired to develop their own lives spiritually. He recently retired form the NFL in late January 2010.
Steve Harvey is a famous man now in the public eye. He is known for making movies and being a comedian. Now, he shows his theology to the world. His theology is nothing new. It's about don't judge anyone at any circumstance, don't preach that much agaisnt sin, compromise in letting the worldly influence into the church. Even in dating advice, he's wrong. His new book is called "Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man: What Men Really Think About Love, Relationships, Intimacy, and Commitment." That's wrong on it face, because a man should act and think like a man. A woman should think and act like a woman. The book pretty much says that ladies must adapt to a man's thinking or they will be single. That's silly since a woman should be their own independent selves without a man dictating their personalities or unique value. Likewise, a man should be their ownselves in dating a person and not compromise who they really are. Real people will attract real people if you will just be yourself. The book is filled with stereotypes and innuedos about both genders like: men are more sex driven than women are, men like women who keep themselves and their homes looking good, you'll know if a man loves a woman if a man show you off to family and friends and call you something other than your name ("my lady" for example), and men don't like to talk about their feelings. I guess Steve forgot that Jesus cried and showed his emotions constantly. Real men don't want a Stepford wife. A real man needs a real woman. This isn't 1955 with a Ozzie and Harriet mentality. Steve Harvey is on his 3rd marriage to a woman, which he cheated on his 2nd ex-wife with. His ex-wife that he was with for 17 years and married to for 10 years have claimed physical and emotional abuse including neglecting his other kids and the son they share together. The book is in error also because a man should cultivate the needs and interests of the woman plus vice versa. A man should be a man naturally. A woman shouldn't force a man to be a man period. A man should be a man without assistance from a woman on how to be a man (and vice versa). The book promotes the stereotype that males naturally are lazy, not considerate, most men will cheat on their spouse, etc. The truth is that real men are multifaceted in their attributes (like working on jobs, having compassion for people, even shedding tears, standing up for what we believe in, showing strength, etc.). The lesson here is that personal communication is a key in developing relationships. Steve Harvey believes in the 90 Day rule. That means that you have sex with a woman after 90 days of going out. Isn't he suppose to be a Christian, yet he promotes fornication in relationships? The truth is that a man should have self control in his actions. This is 2010 not the Victorian 19th century era. He is not a Doctor, Psychologist, or Licensed Therapist. For example, he claims not to condone cheating in men, however, he will explain a cheating man as just interpreting his own cheating as getting "tightened up," and nothing more. No, a cheating person regardless of gender is a deciever, a liar, and an adulterer if the person is married. A man doesn't need a dating book to improve his confidence. A man just lives his life as a man with independent thinking without ego boosts from a woman. Likewise, an independent woman can easily provide for her own needs. The fact is that men and women should get their lives in order before going into a long term relationship with anyone without stereotypes. Women should not be a slave in their place. Men and woman should be independent and think for themselves. Men aren't simplistic or one dimensional people at all who are all scared of emotional commitment. The shameful thing is that this book is about the stereotyping of especially Black Men and Black Woman, because I know plenty of black people (among both genders) that aren't cheaters, money hungry, or lust after sex constantly. The book embodies an outdated world view in which women are desperate to pin down a man, men are uniformly selfish and simpleminded, and a woman has to conform to the man's mindset in order to manipulate a man into getting what she wants. Steve Harvey talks about God and religion, but on his radio show he sometimes curse like a sailor. Doctrinally, Steve Harvey believes that Christians should judge nothing. He was on TBN crying with his ally & Barack Obama supporter Donnie McClurkin. Steve Harvey complained about the criticism against him by saying that people don't know him. Donnie pacified Steve when he cried about how no one understands what he goes through. People do since people in Steve's position have woke up and became born again for thousands of years. Donnie didn't correct Steve Harvey, but went along with his words. Harvey pushed his secular book on dating on TBN. He made the unscriptural, deceptive comment that: "...some Christians make the path to narrow and should broaden it..." Harvey meant by that quote that he believes that Christians should be more accomodating to the secular crowds and sinners joining the Church. The Bible though teaches that the path to Heaven is narrow: "...Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it..." (Matthew 7:13-14). This means that a narrow gate is location to find eternal life. There is nothing wrong to welcome sinners into the Church voluntarily with respect and love. There is a problem when some in the Church will try to compromise with them as an excuse to be politically correct though. So, we should not judge immorally, but we should judge righteous judgment (as found in John 7:24) and inspire people to repent in a loving fashion. Steve Harvey can really wake up though, so I want to make that clear.
Peter Ruckman is a keen deception in Christianity. He had his headquarters in Pensacola, Florida. Now, his major heresy is teaching that the KJV is advanced revelation being even superior to the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts of the Bible. He does this in claiming to defend the KJV, but he isn't defending the King James Bible at all. He's giving haters of the KJV ammunition in order to unfairly demonize true proponents of the KJV. He said that: “The A.V. 1611 reading, here, is superior to any Greek text” (Peter Ruckman, The Christian’s Handbook of Manuscript Evidence, Pensacola Bible Press, 1970, p. 118) and “Mistakes in the A.V. 1611 are advanced revelation!” (Ruckman, Manuscript Evidence, p. 126). The truth is that the inspired Word of God existed before 1611. The church and even ancient Jewish people had scriptures for eons. The original manuscripts were created by inspiration of God, but the King James Version of the Bible is an accurate translation of the original text (the original text was given by inspiration of the Holy Spirit). Perservation is God's promise that he will perserve his Word forever, which is true. The Geneva Bible and the KJV are a result of perservation. Now, Peter Ruckman has multiple divorces (and remarriage) for non-adultery reasons and he tries to justify them. Divorces are known for their hostility, children suffer for a time, and it deals with a broken promise obviously. He believes that man is saved by works in different times, but the Bible is clear that God is saved by grace through faith (even in the Tribulation, the blood of the Lamb saves sin). Ruckman is known for extreme anger and utilizing name calling like calling people punks, dumb, jack legs, etc. He blasphemes God in lying that God tells him to speak like this. The Bible is clear that we should let no filty communication out of your mouth. James 3:13-17 forbids people using envy and strife as a means to get our point across. There is nothing wrong with humbling yourself in other to express your views in life. He teaches heresies like angels are 33 year old males without wings and that all women in the church age will get 33 year old bodies in the Rapture, the flood in 2 Peter 3 is not Noah's flood, and that God ordained the Earth 12 boundaries with 12 nations (to be destined to leave the earth). He even believes in abortion on demand now. The baby is clearly formed in the womb as a distinct human life. Killing unborn human life is a sin. The Bible says don't kill and don't shed innocent blood (which defines abortion completely to a T). Peter Ruckman is a racist that believes that segregation against black Americans is fine. He said the slander that all black people are racists. Sister Tracy (form www.jesus-is-lord.com) left a Ruckman conference because he expressed bigotry against his fellow human beings. Sister Tracy is a black woman.
Some verses to ponder in conclusion:
Isaiah 56:3 Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree. 56:6 Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, EVERY ONE that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant; 56:7 Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: THEIR BURNT OFFERINGS AND THEIR SACRIFICES SHALL BE ACCEPTED UPON MINE ALTAR; FOR MINE HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED AN HOUSE OF PRAYER FOR ALL PEOPLE.
Romans 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God.
Isaiah 56:3 Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree. 56:6 Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, EVERY ONE that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant; 56:7 Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: THEIR BURNT OFFERINGS AND THEIR SACRIFICES SHALL BE ACCEPTED UPON MINE ALTAR; FOR MINE HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED AN HOUSE OF PRAYER FOR ALL PEOPLE.
Romans 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God.
Ephesians 6:9 ... your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.
Colossians 3:25 But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons.
James 2:1-3, 9 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons. For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment; And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
1 Peter 1:17 And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:
Lev 19:34 But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
The Bible shows examples of how we can be saved:
6}Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
-John 14:6 (KJV)
{9}That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.{10}For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
-Romans 10:9-10 (KJV)
{17}..where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
-IICorinthians 3:17 (KJV)
-IICorinthians 3:17 (KJV)
The Surveillance/anti-Liberty Society
The Surveillance society is a threat in the world. The Detriot incident has many questions and some believe it was a staged event. The person caught is named Abdulmutallab. He is more than just an extremist trying to ignite a powdery explosive substance on board a flight into the USA (He is from Nigeria). Eyewitnesses point to a man helping the accused young terrorsist to board an aircraft without a password. There is an unusal cameraman documenting the attempted attack on board the plane. This raise more than red flag and it could point to an intelligence operation (in the form of a drill) that is utilized to continue this evil war on terror. Even CNN interviewed key flight witnesses during their December 28th program raising these points (and a possible intelligence handler). Kurt Haskell and his wife saw a well dressed, wealthy looking Indian man giving assistance to Farouk Abdulmutallab at the boarding gate in Amsterdam. Haskell said that the accused bomber looked "poor" next to the well dressed man. Haskell said that the man did the talking for Abdullamutallab claiming that he was a Sudanese refugee, so he doesn't need a passport to board the aircraft. The gate attended reffered the odd couple of a older Indian man and a Nigerian young man (who was reported to U.S. authorities by his own father) to the manager. Haskell said that's the last he saw of the wealthy man. Haskell's wife, Laurie, said that it's odd that authorities didn't follow up on the seeing the Indian man prior to boarding the flight. A camerman pictured the whole flight. This cameraman was the only one standing up and intently filmed the entire incident. Now, neo-liberals and neo-cons like Senator Liberman want to preemptively attack Yemen. Also, there are body scanners that can see the naked human body, etc. Kurt Haskell made bombshell revelations also about Flight 253. He said that the FBI detained a 2nd man after dogs detected a bomb in his luggage. The FBI has not only ignored Haskell’s story, but they have launched a cover-up by refusing to even acknowledge the existence of another man who filmed the entire flight, including the aborted attack, as well as the well-dressed man who aided the bomber to board the plane even though he had no passport and was on a terror watch list. Haskell believed that the FBI have acted lackadaiscal in how they handled airport security after the plane landed at the Detriot Metro airport in Romulus, Michigan. Haskell said that the FBI showed him images of people, but the agents tried to pass off 2 photos of Mutallab to discredit him. Mr. Haskell questioned why officials have not released the Amsterdam airport security video that will undoubtedly reveal crucial information about the “sharp-dressed man” who escorted a disheveled Mutallab to the boarding area. He said that the FBI used a bomb sniffing dog to handcuff another Indian young man. Later, the FBI moved the passengers to another location. The Nigerian man has been called the underwear bomber.
Yemen is apart of the war on terror since it has oil near Saudi Arabia. It exports billions of dollars worth of crude oil per year. Some believe its oil supplies are shrinking. Yemeni crude oil exports decreased to $1.5 billion during the fiscal period from January -October of 2009, compared with $4.2 billion during the same period of 2008, a decrease of $2.7 billion, the Central Bank of Yemen reported. Some believe its oil reserves are decreasing and it could lose it tally by 10 years. Of course, this doesn't prove Peak Oil since oil resources are gorwing in other places globally as well. There is more to Yemen as well.
UK PM Gordon Brown even wants an emegency summit among the U.S. and the UK to deal with Yemen as a terrorist haven. He believes that the governments of American and the UK to tackle Yemen's al-Qaeda problem. This is a green light to expand the War on Terror in Yemen and Africa even more than it is already. “The United States will more than double its security assistance to Yemen, officials said Friday, and Britain will host an international meeting this month to seek ways to prevent the poorest Arab nation from becoming an al-Qaeda stronghold,” reports The Washington Post. “The announcements highlight mounting Western concern over Yemen after a failed attempt to bomb a U.S. airliner on Christmas; the suspect is a Nigerian man who reportedly told authorities that he received training and equipment in the country, which borders Saudi Arabia.” This is insanity since we have a recession now already. Houthi fighters disagree with the current government of Yemen (who are alllied with the Sunni Saudi Arabian government). That is why Saudi warplanes attacked northern Yemen villages and troops are sent from Saudi Arabia into Yemen. The Houthi believe that the Yemeni government are discriminating against them politically, economically, and religiously. The Yemeni government believe that the northern Sa'ada region of their nation is a terrorist then. The Shabab revels in Somalia now want to send fighters into Yemen to fight jihad according to the New York Times. These fighters have battled the African Union peacekeeping force including the transational federal government in Somalia (which is only across the Gulf of Aden near Ymen). The Times believe that the Shabab fighters established links with al-Qaeda. Webster Griffin Tarpley believe that battle in Yemen relates to Sunni vs. Shiite power struggles and the West trying to claim more power over Russia in his own words:
"...In Yemen, a civil war pits the Saudi-backed central government against the Iranian-backed Shiite Houthi rebels, whom the US has bombed at least twice this month. The goal here is to play Iran against Saudi Arabia so as to weaken both the pro-Moscow Achmadinejad government in Iran, and also those Saudi forces that are fed up with their status as a US protectorate. The US is openly now sponsoring a regroupment of “al Qaeda” (the CIA Moslem legion) in Yemen , including by sending fighters direct from Guantanamo . The new CIA-promoted entity synthetic entity is “Al Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula or AQAP, a gaggle of US patsies, dupes, and fanatics which is claiming credit for the Umar Farouk incident. The US hopes to further dominate the exit from the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, while also easing pressure on the battered US dollar by jacking up the price of oil in an atmosphere of tension on the Arabian peninsula..."
So, the Umar Farouk possible false flag incident have been exploited by internationalists and governmental leaders in order to fight battles in Yemen in order for the Middle East plus Africa to be encoporated in the new world order construct. TSA Scanners exist now in America. The full body scanners are frying travelers with radiation. This has been increasing with the failed terrorist attempt on Flight 253. These scanners have been exposed as dangerous by real researchers. Neo cons want these X-Rays shipped nationwide. Yet, these things can have unhealthy amounts of ionic radiation just for the sake of the incident of Mutallab. The Zogby poll say that Americans approve long lines and gridlock at airport passenger screening points.The majority of people supporting stuff like this doesn't mean that they are right. They are wrong since civil liberties are important to perserve. The TSA or the Transportation Security Agency is in charge of airport screening. So, much of the public want the TSA to enact fascist policies among people. People now may have to go to X-Ray machines into order to pass through airport security checkpoints. The TSA Security Laboratory Director Susan Hallowell recently announced the agency’s intent to use back-scatter X-ray machines for passenger surveillance. They can track people's whole body with explosure of ionizing radiation to people. These machiens are tested in U.S. airports like JFK, LAX, and Orlando. The government is making more profit over these events. In the last 17 months, TSA has received over 30,000 proposals for Big Brother technology and equipment needed to keep 280 million citizen-suspects under careful surveillance from the inside out. This is growing the Big Brother police state in America. Digital Security Systems of Miami have promoted its ConPass Security Body Scanner that can do virtual cavity searches using deeply pentrating X-Radiation.
Scanners have been exposed grealty. Some want to boycott these scanners, because they violate human privacy, they are a health risk, and it apart of a long list of tyranny. We don't need a control grid that eixsts so common in American society. Global warming hysteria, and other instruments are utilized by those among the government including Homeland Security in order to decrease personal freedom, while totalitarianism is permitted to be a reality. This oppressive scanning security could spread into shopping malls, public schools, and many other buildings. Now, the TSA and Homeland Security want people who opt out of body scanners to embrace a full pat down on their bodies. TV Networks are promoting these devices from CNN, FOX, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, etc. Now, there are calls to renew the expiring and evil Patriot Act. Paranoia is running amok here in the West, when an aborted plane bombing attempt is exploited as means to fund military operations in Yemen. Homeland Security has gone too far agian by experiment with a bracelet shock device. If it's given unto all travelers, it can electric shock them if they deem suspicious (which classification can be subjective at times). “A senior government official with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expressed great interest in a so-called safety bracelet that would serve as a stun device, similar to that of a police Taser®. According to this promotional video found at the Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. website, the bracelet would be worn by all airline passengers,” reported the Washington Times. In the UK, body scanners can violate child pornography laws like the Protection of CHildren Act of 1978. This law makes it illegal to create an indecent image or a pseudo-image of a child. So, in the UK, they have no right to use these full body scanners according to Terri Dowty. She is from the Action for Rights of Chiildren. Michael Chertoff (whose security consulting agency called the Chertoff Group including a client that manufactures body scanners in airports). That is why Chertoff wants such inventions in airports nationwide. These scanners have health cornerns (especially if people who have previous x-ray scans, mammograms, or is a frequent flyer experience these scans). Dr. John Gofman, Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology at University of California, Berkeley, maintains that there is no safe dose of ionizing radiation. Gofman argues that radiation from medical diagnostics and treatment is responsible for 50 per cent of cancers of 60 per cent of heart disease cases amongst Americans. “The fact, that X-ray doses are so seldom measured, reflects the false assumption that doses do not matter…[but] they do matter enormously. And each bit of additional dose matters, because any X-ray photon may be the one which sets in motion the high-speed, high energy electron which causes a carcinogenic or atherogenic [smooth muscle] mutation. Such mutations rarely disappear. The higher their accumulated number in a population, the higher will be the population’s mortality rates from radiation-induced cancer and ischemic heart disease,” states Gofman. Even some people like Ben Wallace said that scanners aren't a silver dullet in stopping such potential bombers. Ben Wallace is from the defense research organizaiton called QinetQ. We should disagree with these bull body scanners.
InfraGrad is another spy group. Matthew Rothschild from The Progressive at February 7, 2008 reported on InfraGrad. This is the first time of me hearing of this organization. InfraGrad is about 23,000 representatives of private industry working quietly with the FBI and the DHS (or the Department of Homeland Security). InfraGrad recieved terrorist threats before the public or even public officals do. They provide information to the government. The ACLU opposes this group, beacuse this group may be another spy organ of the federal government via corporations like the TIPS program. There is nothing wrong with legit corporations as long as they play by the rules and don't get involved in anti-liberty activites. Corporations shouldn't control all laws and the government. rhough The people and individuals ought to control the government and create the laws. This group has been involved in emergency drills (Curt Haugen is CEO of S'Curo Group admitted to this. Haugen himself is a InfraGrad member). One InfraGrad member told Rothschild that he has a right to shoot to kill in case of emergencies. That's strange, but this is the mentality of many anti-liberty, pro-police states members of government (not all people in government). Random searches, excessive surveillance, and militarized police are common place in many large cities of America. It's even worse in the United Kingdom. Simon Jenkins from Wednesday on February 6, 2008 had an article mentioned by The Guardian. Jenkins documents the police state action in the UK. For example, Jenkins wrote that some British officals private dealings between lawyer and client, and between MP and constituent, should no longer be considered immune from state surveillance. The monitoring organisation Privacy International cites Great Britian as having the worse record in Europe in terms of protecting privacy. Even Liberals in Britian want oversight, but oversight masks the issue. The real solution is the curtailing of these surveillance obstruction of our rights and a return to principles of warrants, laws, and other legitimate situations.
By Timothy
By Timothy