Wednesday, March 31, 2010
FCC Adviser Advocates State-run Propaganda “Megaphone” to Counter Alternative Media
From http://www.infowars.com/fcc-adviser-advocates-state-run-propaganda-megaphone-to-counter-alternative-media/
FCC Adviser Advocates State-run Propaganda “Megaphone” to Counter Alternative Media
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 31, 2010
In order to counter alternative media, an adviser to the Federal Communications Commission has suggested using your tax money — or rather money the government borrows from bankers and then expects your children to pay off — to create “public media” that will serve as a “filter” and a “megaphone” for a network of government-funded journalists competing with other, non-government-backed reporters, according to Matt Cover, writing for CNSNews.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has addressed the National Broadband Plan in FDR-esque overtones.
Rutgers University law professor Ellen Goodman, who is a “distinguished” visiting scholar with the FCC’s Future of Media Project, submitted the proposal in a draft of the government takeover plan targeted at the internet called the National Broadband Plan.
The feds are pushing their internet takeover plan under left cover, specifically touchy-feely platitudes about the disabled, and providing “free” internet as a form of democratic egalitarianism (nothing is “free,” especially when it is offered by government). FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has addressed the issue in FDR-esque overtones, stating that broadband internet “is our generation’s major infrastructure challenge… It’s like roads, canals, railroads and telephones for previous generations. It’s like electricity in its transformative power.”
Commissar Goodman said the government needs to provide the “narrative content necessary to involve the entire population in democratic decision making or to foster widespread economic and social flourishing.” She said there are “information gaps” in the investigative journalism arena, especially in regard to “underserved, minority, and poor populations.” Goodman wants to “transcend” the “legacy public broadcasting system” in order to “correct these deficits.”
She said the federal plan to take over the internet is the key to correcting the nation’s civic “deficits” and called for a digital public media network to connect government-funded journalists together.
Goodman said “public media” (government run and controlled media) is necessary because while information is “abundant” today, “wisdom and knowledge remain hard won.” In other words, she believes the corporate media and especially the alternative media are not doing enough to disseminate government propaganda.
“Public media contributions are especially needed in the areas of enterprise journalism (particularly at the local level), educational content, and content that illuminates issues of particular relevance to minority and underserved audiences,” she added.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
Goodman’s “underserved” audiences, of course, will be determined by the government and based on how they vote and to what degree they support the ruling elite. Don’t expect Libertarians and other critics of government to be allowed to participate (most would find such participation abhorrent, so moot point).
Goodman’s network of government “investigative journalists” (an oxymoron if ever there was one) would connect on the internet and “operationalize” the new public (government) “non-commercial” media.
New public media are needed, Goodman argues, to foster “virtual and real spaces” for “intelligent discourse” (managed by the federal government) free from the “commercial pressures” of independent, non-government media — in other words, the government needs to create a monopoly because it cannot compete with commercial and alternative media now predominate on the internet.
Alternative and commercial media, she explains, engage in “ever more outrageous flares” (academic-speak for talk radio and news and information websites outside the orbit of the corporate media).
Goodman has suggested a takeover of public television in order to realize her comrades-in-arms vision. But it does not stop there. She also believes the government must take over commercial television. “The Plan also threw out the idea of using noncommercial TV spectrum auction revenues (to be generated by voluntary consolidation of stations) to fund public media,” she writes. “I supported this kind of approach in my comments and think there may really be something to it. But it’s an issue that will take a long time to work though, that will involve the whole TV band, including commercial TV stations, and that will require Congressional action.” (Emphasis added.)
The government is desperate to counter the free flow of information especially on the internet and steer the populace back on the government propaganda track. It will exploit “underserved audiences” in order to do this. People are currently abandoning the corporate media in huge numbers (and in the process abandoning government propaganda).
Finally, reading Goodman’s comments about government-supported journalists I am reminded of the “People’s Correspondents” in the former Soviet Union. They were amateur “proletarian” journalists (from formerly “underserved audiences”) who filed reports from the frontlines about the march toward communism beginning in the early years of the Soviet Union. Under Stalin, there were more than 3 million worker and agriculture correspondents. They were instructed on appropriate themes by the communist party and Soviet newspaper editors and journalists.
FCC Adviser Advocates State-run Propaganda “Megaphone” to Counter Alternative Media
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 31, 2010
In order to counter alternative media, an adviser to the Federal Communications Commission has suggested using your tax money — or rather money the government borrows from bankers and then expects your children to pay off — to create “public media” that will serve as a “filter” and a “megaphone” for a network of government-funded journalists competing with other, non-government-backed reporters, according to Matt Cover, writing for CNSNews.
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has addressed the National Broadband Plan in FDR-esque overtones.
Rutgers University law professor Ellen Goodman, who is a “distinguished” visiting scholar with the FCC’s Future of Media Project, submitted the proposal in a draft of the government takeover plan targeted at the internet called the National Broadband Plan.
The feds are pushing their internet takeover plan under left cover, specifically touchy-feely platitudes about the disabled, and providing “free” internet as a form of democratic egalitarianism (nothing is “free,” especially when it is offered by government). FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has addressed the issue in FDR-esque overtones, stating that broadband internet “is our generation’s major infrastructure challenge… It’s like roads, canals, railroads and telephones for previous generations. It’s like electricity in its transformative power.”
Commissar Goodman said the government needs to provide the “narrative content necessary to involve the entire population in democratic decision making or to foster widespread economic and social flourishing.” She said there are “information gaps” in the investigative journalism arena, especially in regard to “underserved, minority, and poor populations.” Goodman wants to “transcend” the “legacy public broadcasting system” in order to “correct these deficits.”
She said the federal plan to take over the internet is the key to correcting the nation’s civic “deficits” and called for a digital public media network to connect government-funded journalists together.
Goodman said “public media” (government run and controlled media) is necessary because while information is “abundant” today, “wisdom and knowledge remain hard won.” In other words, she believes the corporate media and especially the alternative media are not doing enough to disseminate government propaganda.
“Public media contributions are especially needed in the areas of enterprise journalism (particularly at the local level), educational content, and content that illuminates issues of particular relevance to minority and underserved audiences,” she added.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
Goodman’s “underserved” audiences, of course, will be determined by the government and based on how they vote and to what degree they support the ruling elite. Don’t expect Libertarians and other critics of government to be allowed to participate (most would find such participation abhorrent, so moot point).
Goodman’s network of government “investigative journalists” (an oxymoron if ever there was one) would connect on the internet and “operationalize” the new public (government) “non-commercial” media.
New public media are needed, Goodman argues, to foster “virtual and real spaces” for “intelligent discourse” (managed by the federal government) free from the “commercial pressures” of independent, non-government media — in other words, the government needs to create a monopoly because it cannot compete with commercial and alternative media now predominate on the internet.
Alternative and commercial media, she explains, engage in “ever more outrageous flares” (academic-speak for talk radio and news and information websites outside the orbit of the corporate media).
Goodman has suggested a takeover of public television in order to realize her comrades-in-arms vision. But it does not stop there. She also believes the government must take over commercial television. “The Plan also threw out the idea of using noncommercial TV spectrum auction revenues (to be generated by voluntary consolidation of stations) to fund public media,” she writes. “I supported this kind of approach in my comments and think there may really be something to it. But it’s an issue that will take a long time to work though, that will involve the whole TV band, including commercial TV stations, and that will require Congressional action.” (Emphasis added.)
The government is desperate to counter the free flow of information especially on the internet and steer the populace back on the government propaganda track. It will exploit “underserved audiences” in order to do this. People are currently abandoning the corporate media in huge numbers (and in the process abandoning government propaganda).
Finally, reading Goodman’s comments about government-supported journalists I am reminded of the “People’s Correspondents” in the former Soviet Union. They were amateur “proletarian” journalists (from formerly “underserved audiences”) who filed reports from the frontlines about the march toward communism beginning in the early years of the Soviet Union. Under Stalin, there were more than 3 million worker and agriculture correspondents. They were instructed on appropriate themes by the communist party and Soviet newspaper editors and journalists.
The Hutaree story and more news
I knew something was up with the Hutaree story made by the mainstream media. Know, the truth about them is further known. CNN falsely said that the Hutaree cult was some how connected to the Michigan Militia website and the Tea Party Movement (even though I don't agree with them on every issue) Yet, the link between the Michigan Militia and the Hutaree group is not there. Many of the Tea Party activists have legitimate concerns about the government. Even I realize that not everyone in the Tea Party group want terrorism. The Hutaree wanted to kill cops, which is wrong. Some feel that certain people are exploiting these events in order to suppress free speech in America. The Hutaree group had a sick obsession with killing children. Many of them are probably mentally ill. One Hutaree member made a YouTube video dressed in camouflage and waving a machine sun speaking in a sinister altered voice. Some in the mainstream media want to use the raids to imply that every militia and Tea Party groups shares the Hutaree cult's violent agenda. On CNN, Potok claimed that anyone believe that some people wanting a new world order system is an extremist. That's a lie of course. The Michigan Militia website condemned Hutaree for its extremism. They condemned violence against law enforcement people as well. The CNN report featured a long lingering shot of a web page advertising an upcoming Tea Party event while the correspondent discussed charges of killing police officers using explosives. While the Hutaree allegedly planned to abduct and kill police officers as well as bombing their funerals, the Michigan Militia openly condemns “attacks or threats of any sort directed against our elected representatives or law enforcement officers.” Also, when is open carry of guns or the Second Amendment evil or terroristic? They aren't. Some in CNN trying protray patriots as terrorists don't work. Ironically, Anderson Cooper is from the Astor bloodline, he was trained to be a CIA agent (when the CIA initiated acts of real terrorism against the Third World and others since their creation in 1947), and is promoting this propaganda. His network and other used the lies (dealing with weapons of mass destruction) that carried forward over million Iraqis. CNN is even hyping up false information about Iran's nuclear energy program. They are no different than FOX in this regard. FOX is overt with it and CNN is covert with it. Suppression of free speech done by the left gatekeepers is just as wrong as suppression of civil liberties done by the neo conservative crowd. The media is very hypocritical when they compare political dissent with terror when they supported real acts of terror globally for over 50 years. The government exploits the Hutaree's decoys as an excuse to demonize Christians (especially if you believe in prophecy), anyone exposing the new world order agenda, and people who disagree with the establishment's propaganda. Potok is a liar by saying that no elites want world government when elites have called for a one world government by their own quotes for decades. The SPLC acts like a disagree contradicting their own supposed goals of promoting civil rights. The Wall Street Journal reported that the FBI had an informant in the Hutaree group and participated in the alleged conspiracy to kill law enforcement officers. In sworn testimony, Thomas William Piatek is described as a Cooperating Witness and an undercover FBI agent. The FBI's Detroit's office didn't comment on this issue. If this is true, this isn't surprising since FBI people infiltrated like minded groups for years. A FBI informant worked in the Fort Dix Army New Jersey terror plot. “The only terrorist conspiracy was one planted and nurtured by the informant,” declared defense attorney Rocco Cip during the trial. The FBI’s role in the case was admitted by a provocateur. “The FBI informant paid to infiltrate a band of suspected terrorists in South Jersey said yesterday that he offered to organize their attack on U.S. soldiers, but only because he wanted to build trust and find out more about the group,” the Star-Ledger reported on November 11, 2008. A FBI informant worked in the Miami Seven case. Of course, Hal Turner is a FBI agent according to the third highest ranking FBI official in NYC. Turner admitted that he was recruited by the FBI's Newark based Joint Terrorism Task Force. He was paid in excess of $100,000 by the FBI during his almost 5 years as an informant. According to research conducted by Alexandra Natapoff of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, the FBI maintains an army of at least 15,000 “confidential informants,” while the DEA admits to having 4,000 snitches. This is a small part of the entire informants working for state and local police agencies. The lesson here is that violence is wrong. Yet, we should never be ashamed and intimidated by the corporate media or anyone else in what we believe in. I believe in exposing proposed FEMA Camps, the new world order agenda, and other evils. The government might be reading these words, but my views are clear. The establishment can never crush real independent, thought provoking thought. They can never crush the Truth. I believe in being pro-life, pro-Nationalism, National sovereignty, being for the Second Amendment, and believing in personal liberties.
President John F. Kennedy is certainly underrated in his intellect. He could speak eloquently and he delievered a passionate vision on a myriad of issues. JFK wasn't perfect, but he did do many legitimate things. Later on his Presidency, Kennedy took concrete steps in opposing the agenda of the military industrial complex. This occured especially in 1963, which was revolutionary in that time. The establishment left (one person was a professor I had in college who was a liberal, but respected Eisenhower's foreign policy more than JFK's foreign policy. She implied JFK as been aloof, which is silly) and the establishment right hate him since he wasn't a brainwashed person following political paradigm. The record is that after the Bay of Pigs error, President John F. Kennedy fired CIA Director Allen Dulles and others for their Bay of Pigs debacle (Bundy admitted his msitake). In 1962, he faced the Cuban Missile Crisis. He ordered a blockade to stop the crisis and prevent more Soviet missiles from coming into Cuba. Kennedy wanted peace, so he issued secret channels with Nikita Khrushchev to get rid of Soviet missiles from Cuba (while the USA covertly got rid of their missiles from Turkey). John F. Kennedy opposed many of the Generals like Curtis Le May since many of them desired an unilateral invasion of Cuba, which is wrong since that act could cause a conflict among the USA and the then USSR. Attorney General Kennedy worked with Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dorbrynin to solve the problem since the military was putting pressure on Kennedy to strike Cuba. In his memoirs, Khrushchev recalled a further, chilling sentence from Robert Kennedy’s appeal to Dobrynin: “If the situation continues much longer, the President is not sure that the military will not overthrow him and seize power.” Khrushchev wanted to give the President help. As 1963 came about, both Kennedy and Khrushchev desired constructive peace efforts. They both supported a joint USA/Soviet march to the Moon. On November 12, 1963, JFK issued his National Security Action Memorandum 271, ordering NASA to implement his “September 20 proposal for broader cooperation between the United States and the USSR in outer space, including cooperation in lunar landing programs.” They wanted a more peaceful planet as Kennedy rejected a Pax Americana plan of enforcement of American weapons of war in the world. This is opposition to the military industrial complex as they are dependent on the Pax Americana ideal (as said in his American University Address speech. Khrushchev and the Soviets loved the speech). Kennedy in July 25, 1963 signed with the Soviets a partial Nuclear test pan treaty. Kennedy negotitated the Test Ban Treaty without consulting the Joints Chiefs of Staff since they opposed it. Kennedy took on Big Steel since Big Steel did price fixing in violation of their agreement between U.S. Steel and the United Steelworkers's union. In a head-on confrontation with the ruling elite of Big Steel, JFK ordered the Defense Department to switch huge military contracts away from the major steel companies to the smaller, more loyal contractors that had not defied him. Some in the establishment hated JFK for these acts. Kennedy talked with Castro in trying to find a better relation with America. He issued the top secret order on October 11, 1963 to begin withdrawing the U.S. military from Vietnam. In National Security Action memorandum 263, he ordered that 1,000 U.S. military personnel be withdrawn from Vietnam by the end of 1963, and that the bulk of U.S. personnel be taken out by the end of 1965. Defense Robert McNamara was told by the President that he wanted helicopters gone from Vietnam too. With his assassination, the Vietnam war escalated causing about 58,000 Americans to die and over 3 million Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians to die. John F. Kennedy unlike LBJ was for Third World nationalism. He supported the newly independent countries of Africa in the early 1960's and the President Sukarno of Indonesia. Sukarno wanted to be neutral and he coined the phrase of Third World, but the CIA wanted him dead. Under Eisenhower's Presidency, the CIA tried to kill and overthrow Sukarno, but they failed. Sukarno visited the White House in 1961 with the support of JFK. The CIA didn't like this. President John F. Kennedy wanted to work Sukarno and agreed to meet Indonesia in the Spring of 1964. If this occured, Kennedy would overtly show his support of Third World nationalism. Since JFK was murder, LBJ allowed the CIA to overthrow Sukarno in a purge of suspected Communists. More than 500,000 to 1 million Indonesians died from the event. Kennedy wanted to see an end of the contrived Cold War and extend his thinking into new areans. Quakers told JFK to harbor peace and give a food surplus to China. Kennedy said that he should follow the words of Jesus, but the China Lobby in Washington would resist him. In the fall of 1963 (or a year later), he gave wheat to the Russian since they had a severe grain shortage. His critics were saying that he was funding his enemies, yet it isn't evil to give legitimate aid to those starving or in need of legitimate supplies. So, President John F. Kennedy was a more eloquent advocate for peace than his critics proclaim. LBJ will never be JFK. JFK not LBJ proposed a war on poverty, civil rights legislation, a decrease of military involvement in Vietnam, housing legislation, etc. LBJ passed much of Kennedy's legitimate proposals dealing with Voting rights and Civil rights. Certainly, Kennedy realized that he didn't fear death and that true peace wouldn't be accomplished in his lifetime. Yet, there is nothing unrealistic and far reaching to promote the real tenets of a more peaceful world (that exists with nationalism, negotiations, strength, and peace). God is the Truth and we have every right to improve our course in life to project the creed of justice.
President John F. Kennedy is certainly underrated in his intellect. He could speak eloquently and he delievered a passionate vision on a myriad of issues. JFK wasn't perfect, but he did do many legitimate things. Later on his Presidency, Kennedy took concrete steps in opposing the agenda of the military industrial complex. This occured especially in 1963, which was revolutionary in that time. The establishment left (one person was a professor I had in college who was a liberal, but respected Eisenhower's foreign policy more than JFK's foreign policy. She implied JFK as been aloof, which is silly) and the establishment right hate him since he wasn't a brainwashed person following political paradigm. The record is that after the Bay of Pigs error, President John F. Kennedy fired CIA Director Allen Dulles and others for their Bay of Pigs debacle (Bundy admitted his msitake). In 1962, he faced the Cuban Missile Crisis. He ordered a blockade to stop the crisis and prevent more Soviet missiles from coming into Cuba. Kennedy wanted peace, so he issued secret channels with Nikita Khrushchev to get rid of Soviet missiles from Cuba (while the USA covertly got rid of their missiles from Turkey). John F. Kennedy opposed many of the Generals like Curtis Le May since many of them desired an unilateral invasion of Cuba, which is wrong since that act could cause a conflict among the USA and the then USSR. Attorney General Kennedy worked with Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dorbrynin to solve the problem since the military was putting pressure on Kennedy to strike Cuba. In his memoirs, Khrushchev recalled a further, chilling sentence from Robert Kennedy’s appeal to Dobrynin: “If the situation continues much longer, the President is not sure that the military will not overthrow him and seize power.” Khrushchev wanted to give the President help. As 1963 came about, both Kennedy and Khrushchev desired constructive peace efforts. They both supported a joint USA/Soviet march to the Moon. On November 12, 1963, JFK issued his National Security Action Memorandum 271, ordering NASA to implement his “September 20 proposal for broader cooperation between the United States and the USSR in outer space, including cooperation in lunar landing programs.” They wanted a more peaceful planet as Kennedy rejected a Pax Americana plan of enforcement of American weapons of war in the world. This is opposition to the military industrial complex as they are dependent on the Pax Americana ideal (as said in his American University Address speech. Khrushchev and the Soviets loved the speech). Kennedy in July 25, 1963 signed with the Soviets a partial Nuclear test pan treaty. Kennedy negotitated the Test Ban Treaty without consulting the Joints Chiefs of Staff since they opposed it. Kennedy took on Big Steel since Big Steel did price fixing in violation of their agreement between U.S. Steel and the United Steelworkers's union. In a head-on confrontation with the ruling elite of Big Steel, JFK ordered the Defense Department to switch huge military contracts away from the major steel companies to the smaller, more loyal contractors that had not defied him. Some in the establishment hated JFK for these acts. Kennedy talked with Castro in trying to find a better relation with America. He issued the top secret order on October 11, 1963 to begin withdrawing the U.S. military from Vietnam. In National Security Action memorandum 263, he ordered that 1,000 U.S. military personnel be withdrawn from Vietnam by the end of 1963, and that the bulk of U.S. personnel be taken out by the end of 1965. Defense Robert McNamara was told by the President that he wanted helicopters gone from Vietnam too. With his assassination, the Vietnam war escalated causing about 58,000 Americans to die and over 3 million Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians to die. John F. Kennedy unlike LBJ was for Third World nationalism. He supported the newly independent countries of Africa in the early 1960's and the President Sukarno of Indonesia. Sukarno wanted to be neutral and he coined the phrase of Third World, but the CIA wanted him dead. Under Eisenhower's Presidency, the CIA tried to kill and overthrow Sukarno, but they failed. Sukarno visited the White House in 1961 with the support of JFK. The CIA didn't like this. President John F. Kennedy wanted to work Sukarno and agreed to meet Indonesia in the Spring of 1964. If this occured, Kennedy would overtly show his support of Third World nationalism. Since JFK was murder, LBJ allowed the CIA to overthrow Sukarno in a purge of suspected Communists. More than 500,000 to 1 million Indonesians died from the event. Kennedy wanted to see an end of the contrived Cold War and extend his thinking into new areans. Quakers told JFK to harbor peace and give a food surplus to China. Kennedy said that he should follow the words of Jesus, but the China Lobby in Washington would resist him. In the fall of 1963 (or a year later), he gave wheat to the Russian since they had a severe grain shortage. His critics were saying that he was funding his enemies, yet it isn't evil to give legitimate aid to those starving or in need of legitimate supplies. So, President John F. Kennedy was a more eloquent advocate for peace than his critics proclaim. LBJ will never be JFK. JFK not LBJ proposed a war on poverty, civil rights legislation, a decrease of military involvement in Vietnam, housing legislation, etc. LBJ passed much of Kennedy's legitimate proposals dealing with Voting rights and Civil rights. Certainly, Kennedy realized that he didn't fear death and that true peace wouldn't be accomplished in his lifetime. Yet, there is nothing unrealistic and far reaching to promote the real tenets of a more peaceful world (that exists with nationalism, negotiations, strength, and peace). God is the Truth and we have every right to improve our course in life to project the creed of justice.
The New York Times calls the campaign helping women after abortion "propaganda." They are liars on that point like usually. The NY Times act like pro-life people aren't allowed to advertise a website and condemn abortion. Susan Dominus wrote her March 26 New York Times article called, "In Subway Ads on Abortion, a Pretense of Neutrality." She attacked recent ads for abortionchangesyou.com. That is a website in which anybody touched by abortion can anonymously share their feelings and learn that they are not alone. Dominus began her story by noting the innocuous nature of the advertisement, but turns on the Web site after revealing its association with Project Rachel, a Catholic initiative. Dominus talked about the adverstisemnt and disaparaged all pro-lifers. She said that anti-abortion strategies go and it's oblique, which is a far cry from a brick in the window or a death threat to a member of Congress. This liar forgotten that for years pro-life people have been assaulted and murdered by pro-abortion extremists. Dominus omits that information typically. Michaeline Fredenburg, founder of the site, told Dominus, "We feel it's really important for women and their families to have a safe place to experience their own range of emotions, apart from the controversy and debate" surrounding abortion. Dominus lies and calls the effort to help women who suffered from the tradegy of abortion as propaganda masquerading as therapy. She's a liar since pro-life people have successfully healed women who were the victims of abortion among decades in American society. Dominus forgot that abortion on demand isn't about promotion women's right. It's about suppressing the rights of unborn human beings from recieving the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Dominus hypocritically tries to say that we Pro-Lifers are using slick tactics, but we are not. We use the overt tactic of having concern for human beings, while respecting life in all of its stages. Dominus omits that the pro-abortion Doula Project and Exhale link to the abortion provider Planned Parenthood on their sites. She omits that women on the abortionchangesyou website have free speech in showing women who regret (or not) of their abortions. We know what abortion is. Abortion is eugenics and it's murder.
An eco-extremists wants freedom to be gone in order to fight "global warming." He only wants a few people with authority to run the Earth. This person wants population reduction in a radical fashion. He is a renowed environmentist. He wants this policy to offset climage change and has called for a more authoritative world. He wants freedom to be submerged under what he sees as the devastating effects of global warming. The person is a futurist named James Lovelock. He wants to put democracy on hold for environmental purposes. He believes in the New Age Gaita hypothesis or that the Earth is one big living organism called Gaia. Lovelock doesn't trust the distorted climate data sent out by the UN affiliated climate scientists. “Fudging the data in any way whatsoever is quite literally a sin against the Holy Ghost of science. I’m not religious, but I put it that way because I feel so strongly. It’s the one thing you do not ever do. You’ve got to have standards.” he states in the interview. He said that he has little faith in renewable energies, carbon trading, or cap and tax schemes (in his interview with the New Scientist, he called them verging on a gigantic scam). He's right on the cap and trade issue since big industries will benefit grealty from a cap and trade system. Wind farms can take up too much space to energy huge energy. The Optimum Population Trust is another UK-based public policy group that want radical decline of the human population (into a "sustainable" level). Lovelock became a patron of the thinktank in 2009. In a statement released by the trust to mark the appointment, Lovelock called on the environmental movement as a whole to “recognise the truth and speak out” on the link between rising human numbers and global warming. Lovelock said that: "...Those who fail to see that population growth and climate change are two sides of the same coin are either ignorant or hiding from the truth. These two huge environmental problems are inseparable and to discuss one while ignoring the other is irrational..." So, he wants to use anti-population deception as a means to promote environmental extremism. This is nothing new. Roger Martin is the chair of OPT and he said of Lovelock's appointment as fine. The OPT wants depopulation and tie it to carbon emissions. The OPT have have as patrons controversial primatologist and environmentalist Jane Goodall, who thinks that caging chimps and other apes is better for them than letting them live free in the wild; Professor Aubrey Manning, president of the UK’s Wildlife Trusts; and Sir Crispin Tickell, the ex-diplomat credited with the “greening” of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. The OPT have a patron named Sir David Attenborough (who is a BBC wildlife broadcaster and film maker), who called for a one child policy in Britain. This occurs in China and it's one of the OPT's main initiatives. Jonathan Porritt is the former chair of the UK Sustainable Development Commission as well. Porritt is one of the Prime Minister Gordon Brown's leading green advisers, who has stated that Britain's population must be cut in half from 60 million to 30 million if it is to build a sustainable society. We have exhaustively exposed the nonsense behind the Earth's current population levels are exceeding sustainable levels and are contributing to devastating climate change. Yet, Lovelock and his ilk at the OPT remain in positions of influence. Lovelock follows the dangerous policy of geoengineering the planet in the name of controlling the climate. In 2007, he proposed laying vast swathes of pipes under the world's oceans in the order to pump water form the bottom of the seas (rich in nutrients) but mostly dead to the top. The idea was that action would make algae to breed, absord more carbon and release more dimethyl sulphide into the atmosphere. This chemical of dimethyl sulphid is known to seed sunlight reflecting clouds. Lovelock wants to try and block out the sun, which is the source of all life on this planet. Lovelock is apart of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. This organization supports the global warming movement. They want to reduce carbon emissions by 80%. This can risk the lowering of the global economy and living standards. This group is even more vehement than the national governments in its advocacy of the man-made cause of global warming. He calls for such drastic CO2 cuts to be made in the short term, not even by the usual target date of 2050. Lovelock falsely believes that we have overpopulation in the Earth and carbon emissions risk our modern civilization. He believes that rising sea levels with make our Earth risk of death of species and man. Thse extremists like Lovelock, the Royal Society, and the OPT aren't alone in their views. John P. Holdren co-authored the 1977 book called "Ecoscience." In it, she supports mass sterilization, one child policies, and a Planetary Regime with the power of life and death. Holdren supported extreme geoengineering projects to try to cool the Earth. This plan calls for shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays. This is similar to spraying chemtrails in the air. Leading NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen agrees with Holdren's view that industrial civilization should be destroyed to save the planet. The same talking points raised by the OPT and James Lovelock have been re-iterated again and again by public policy groups and environmentalists, as well as the most influential scientists in the US government. The evils of sterilization and depopulation are popularized and embraced by extremists like they have been over 100 years ago. The environmental extremists are embracing near eugenics and this isn't surprising since the elite endorse eugenics. You don't exterminate people under fear mongering tactics. There is climate change, but not permanent man-made global warming. The agreement formd the TEC or the Transatlantic Economic Council or the TEC as a permanent body. Trade policy analyst named Daniella Markheim compared the TEC to the now defunct SPP (or the Security and Prosperity Partnership) of North America. The SPP and the TEC address property rights protections and enforcement, effective inspections and data sharing on food safety, border measures affecting trade, and other economic plus security concerns. She also added, “Both of these are forums that enable the U.S. and its significant trade partners to find new avenues to improve the flow of commerce and promote greater coherence and consistency in trade rules and regulations.” A Canada-EU free trade agreement would deepen transatlantic economic integration and advance plans for a common market in the region. 2011 could be a year when negotiations could be signed into a Canada EU CETA deal. NAFTA could be revived and expanded in a trilateral accord. This causes a liberalizing trade in goods, services, investment, and procurement. These interlocking superstates are a foundation of world governance like the EU. Some even desire a North American Union being made incrementally. NAFTA merged with the SPP agenda plus the TEC (including Canada EU CETA) forms the basis for the Transatlantic Union.
There is the Transaltantic agenda. Canada wants to expand its trade horizons. The CETA is currently being negoitated with the EU or the European Union. This appeals to be based on the flawed NAFTA model. Many view it as an opportunity to decrease its trade reliance on the U.S., but it could serve to accelerate the corporate takeover of the uSA. The deal would exceed NAFTA in its scope. The third round of negoitations are scheduled for April 19-23 in Ottowa. There are still lingering conerns about its lack of transparancy. A Canada-EU-CETA could be used to expand NAFTA, strengthen U.S.-E.U. economic relations and further advance the transatlantic agenda. Some believe that the recent Canada U.S. Agreement on Government Procurement is an important step in providing protection for future bilateral trade relations, but in the process it opens up provincial and municipal contracts to foreign corporations. Maude Barlow and Stuart Trew of the Council of Canadians criticized the Conservative government for giving up too much and receiving too little. In an collaborative article they emphasized that, “The provinces have been loath to sign the WTO’s Government Procurement Agreement and did not agree to include subnational procurement in NAFTA because they could lose too much say in how public money is spent without getting any new access to the U.S. market...” They believe that the Canadian leader Harper wanted to have free trade talks with Europe to restructure Canada's economy to reduce the role of our communities in setting spending priorities (in the Buy American controversy). EU is using the proposed CETA with Canada in order for them to gain access to procurement and services (in areas of health, energy, water, and other sectors).
The Canada-U.S. Buy American deal is an extension of NAFTA and has set a precedent which could further reinforce EU demands. The Internet law columnist Michael Gesit wrote in mid-December 2009 that the EU had proposed negiotated an intellectual property chapter which could reshape Canadian copyright law. Geist wrote that: "...While the leaked document may only represent the starting European position, there is little doubt there will be enormous pressure on Canadian negotiators to cave on the IP provision in return for ‘gains’ in other areas.” This ties into Canada's participating in the ACTA or the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement negoitations that includes the E.U., and other nations. Geist believes that the Canada-EU CETA acknowledged that combined with the ACTA, the 2 agreements would undertake a significant rewrite of its law. Geist wrote that: "...The notion of a ‘made-in-Canada’ approach – already under threat from ACTA – would be lost entirely, replaced by a made-in-Washington-and-Brussels law.." The U.S. and the EU singled out Canada for criticism on intellectual property and are pressing for copyright along with other reforms. Conceding to such demands could severly compromise Canadian interests. People are disagreeing with the scope and process of Canada EU trade negotitions. These talks are in secret and there is little disclosure on them by the Canadian government or the media. Groups like the Council of Canadians want transparency on these activities. They wants comprehensive impact assessment, protection for public services and procurement, along with the exclusion of any investment chapter. There are fears that a Canada-EU CETA could include provisions such as NAFTA’s Chapter 11, which gives corporations the power to challenge governmental laws and regulations that restrict their profits. Peter Julian (a NDP International trade critic) criticized Canadian negotiators for using the obsolete and harmful NAFTA template. Julian wants a fair trade model not a NAFTA style agreement. A Canada/EU CETA agreement would promote transatlantic ties and could later include the U.S. as well as Mexico. In 2007, the U.S.-EU reached a deal on a new Transatlantic economic partnership in an effort to work towards eliminating trade barriers increasing investment and streamlining harmonization on regulatiosn.
By Timothy
Anderson Cooper/Southern Poverty Law Center step-up propaganda against American people
From http://www.infowars.com/anderson-coopersouthern-poverty-law-center-step-up-propaganda-against-american-people/
Anderson Cooper/Southern Poverty Law Center step-up propaganda against American people
Andrew Steele
America 20xy
March 30, 2010
Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center was asked to join yet another on-air discussion this week, this time with CNN, which continues the sound the panic alarm against informed Americans the same way the mainstream media did against Islamic people after 9/11.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is an organization that superficially fronts as an “anti-hate organization” to win public support then uses that support, and peoples’ trust in its mission, to socially isolate groups and organizations that protest various federal government policies and lump them together with a few lone extremists. Earlier this year, in a report it released, the Southern Poverty Law Center labeled We Are Change a militia group without offering any basis for doing so. We Are Change has never done anything militant and has always preached peace. Its members include people of all races.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Realizing that people are beginning to wake up as the President of “Change” proves to be just another George Bush, and fearing public backlash against growing federal power, CNN and the rest of the mainstream media are aiming their cameras back at the public in an attempt to divide it, promoting hatred among Americans while pretending to condemn it.
In this segment the pundits imply there is no push by world leaders for world government and that entities like the EU are not the first steps towards one, when the EU itself was once considered a conspiracy theory (now it has a president) and our own world leaders discuss their desire for a world monetary unit and global financial governance. Also notice how Pot0k tries to justify the MIAC report– a DHS document for law enforcement which classified Ron Paul supporters as potential domestic terrorists.
Demonizing “conspiracy theories”– (the ones they don’t want to promote, while continuing to peddle the ones they do, such as the notion that Iran is on the verge of making a nuclear bomb)– this transparently blatant propaganda piece shows just how afraid the corporate media is of the internet and the ability of average people to communicate true information to each other.
Anderson Cooper/Southern Poverty Law Center step-up propaganda against American people
Andrew Steele
America 20xy
March 30, 2010
Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center was asked to join yet another on-air discussion this week, this time with CNN, which continues the sound the panic alarm against informed Americans the same way the mainstream media did against Islamic people after 9/11.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is an organization that superficially fronts as an “anti-hate organization” to win public support then uses that support, and peoples’ trust in its mission, to socially isolate groups and organizations that protest various federal government policies and lump them together with a few lone extremists. Earlier this year, in a report it released, the Southern Poverty Law Center labeled We Are Change a militia group without offering any basis for doing so. We Are Change has never done anything militant and has always preached peace. Its members include people of all races.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Realizing that people are beginning to wake up as the President of “Change” proves to be just another George Bush, and fearing public backlash against growing federal power, CNN and the rest of the mainstream media are aiming their cameras back at the public in an attempt to divide it, promoting hatred among Americans while pretending to condemn it.
In this segment the pundits imply there is no push by world leaders for world government and that entities like the EU are not the first steps towards one, when the EU itself was once considered a conspiracy theory (now it has a president) and our own world leaders discuss their desire for a world monetary unit and global financial governance. Also notice how Pot0k tries to justify the MIAC report– a DHS document for law enforcement which classified Ron Paul supporters as potential domestic terrorists.
Demonizing “conspiracy theories”– (the ones they don’t want to promote, while continuing to peddle the ones they do, such as the notion that Iran is on the verge of making a nuclear bomb)– this transparently blatant propaganda piece shows just how afraid the corporate media is of the internet and the ability of average people to communicate true information to each other.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
FBI Agent Discovered at Center of Alleged Hutaree Conspiracy
From http://www.infowars.com/fbi-agent-discovered-at-center-of-alleged-hutaree-conspiracy/
FBI Agent Discovered at Center of Alleged Hutaree Conspiracy
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 30, 2010
The FBI had an informant inside the Hutaree group and he participated in the alleged conspiracy to kill law enforcement officers, according to The Wall Street Journal today.
In sworn testimony, Thomas William Piatek is described as a Cooperating Witness and an undercover FBI agent.
Thomas William Piatek is pictured at the bottom right. It is interesting to note that, unlike the other suspects, he appears not to be wearing a jail uniform.
“A spokesperson at the FBI’s Detroit office declined to comment on the undercover agent and any role such an agent may have had in the investigation. A spokesman at the Justice Department in Washington also declined to discuss specifics of the investigation,” the Journal reports.
It is not surprising that the FBI had penetrated the Hutaree group and an agent was apparently at the center of the alleged conspiracy. In fact, it is part of a well established pattern.
On March 20, Infowars.com reported on allegations that a federal agent acted as a provocateur in the New York synagogue bombing conspiracy case. Defense attorneys in the case argued in court that the plot was hatched and directed by a federal informant.
“They said the informant badgered the defendants until they got involved in the plot,” NBC New York reported. “They said the informant chose the targets, supplied fake bombs for the synagogues and a fake missile to shoot down planes. The motion said he also offered to pay the defendants, who attorneys alleged weren’t inclined toward any crime until the informant began recruiting them.”
“This whole operation was a foolish waste of time and money,” Terence Kindlon, a defense lawyer who represented a client in the New York synagogue case, told the Times Online. “It is almost as if the FBI cooked up the plot and found four idiots to install as defendants.”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
Defendants in the New Jersey Fort Dix Army terror case painted a similar picture. “The only terrorist conspiracy was one planted and nurtured by the informant,” declared defense attorney Rocco Cip during the trial. The FBI’s role in the case was admitted by a provocateur. “The FBI informant paid to infiltrate a band of suspected terrorists in South Jersey said yesterday that he offered to organize their attack on U.S. soldiers, but only because he wanted to build trust and find out more about the group,” the Star-Ledger reported on November 11, 2008.
In Miami, the FBI case against the so-called Miami Seven came apart at the seams when it was discovered a government provocateur provided money, video cameras for conducting surveillance, cellphones, and suggested that the patsies target the Miami FBI office.
In 2009, it was discovered that supposed white supremacist and radio talk show host Hal Turner was a National Security Intelligence asset, a fact admitted by the third highest ranking FBI official in New York City. During a second trial held this year, Turner described how he was recruited in 2003 by the FBI’s Newark-based Joint Terrorism Task Force. He said he was paid “in excess of $100,000” by the FBI during his almost five years as an informant.
According to research conducted by Alexandra Natapoff of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, the FBI maintains an army of at least 15,000 “confidential informants,” while the DEA admits to having 4,000 snitches. “But the number of informants working directly for the Feds is probably only a tiny fraction of the entire stukachi [a Russian epithet used to describe a secret police informant] population, given the uncounted masses of snitches working for state and local police agencies,” writes William Norman Grigg of the Pro Libertate blog.
FBI Agent Discovered at Center of Alleged Hutaree Conspiracy
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 30, 2010
The FBI had an informant inside the Hutaree group and he participated in the alleged conspiracy to kill law enforcement officers, according to The Wall Street Journal today.
In sworn testimony, Thomas William Piatek is described as a Cooperating Witness and an undercover FBI agent.
Thomas William Piatek is pictured at the bottom right. It is interesting to note that, unlike the other suspects, he appears not to be wearing a jail uniform.
“A spokesperson at the FBI’s Detroit office declined to comment on the undercover agent and any role such an agent may have had in the investigation. A spokesman at the Justice Department in Washington also declined to discuss specifics of the investigation,” the Journal reports.
It is not surprising that the FBI had penetrated the Hutaree group and an agent was apparently at the center of the alleged conspiracy. In fact, it is part of a well established pattern.
On March 20, Infowars.com reported on allegations that a federal agent acted as a provocateur in the New York synagogue bombing conspiracy case. Defense attorneys in the case argued in court that the plot was hatched and directed by a federal informant.
“They said the informant badgered the defendants until they got involved in the plot,” NBC New York reported. “They said the informant chose the targets, supplied fake bombs for the synagogues and a fake missile to shoot down planes. The motion said he also offered to pay the defendants, who attorneys alleged weren’t inclined toward any crime until the informant began recruiting them.”
“This whole operation was a foolish waste of time and money,” Terence Kindlon, a defense lawyer who represented a client in the New York synagogue case, told the Times Online. “It is almost as if the FBI cooked up the plot and found four idiots to install as defendants.”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
Defendants in the New Jersey Fort Dix Army terror case painted a similar picture. “The only terrorist conspiracy was one planted and nurtured by the informant,” declared defense attorney Rocco Cip during the trial. The FBI’s role in the case was admitted by a provocateur. “The FBI informant paid to infiltrate a band of suspected terrorists in South Jersey said yesterday that he offered to organize their attack on U.S. soldiers, but only because he wanted to build trust and find out more about the group,” the Star-Ledger reported on November 11, 2008.
In Miami, the FBI case against the so-called Miami Seven came apart at the seams when it was discovered a government provocateur provided money, video cameras for conducting surveillance, cellphones, and suggested that the patsies target the Miami FBI office.
In 2009, it was discovered that supposed white supremacist and radio talk show host Hal Turner was a National Security Intelligence asset, a fact admitted by the third highest ranking FBI official in New York City. During a second trial held this year, Turner described how he was recruited in 2003 by the FBI’s Newark-based Joint Terrorism Task Force. He said he was paid “in excess of $100,000” by the FBI during his almost five years as an informant.
According to research conducted by Alexandra Natapoff of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, the FBI maintains an army of at least 15,000 “confidential informants,” while the DEA admits to having 4,000 snitches. “But the number of informants working directly for the Feds is probably only a tiny fraction of the entire stukachi [a Russian epithet used to describe a secret police informant] population, given the uncounted masses of snitches working for state and local police agencies,” writes William Norman Grigg of the Pro Libertate blog.
Entitled: The Kingdom's Lost Teaching of Empowering Group Love by Fritz Springmeier
From http://poweredbychrist.homestead.com/files/articles/manna31.htm
Spiritual manna in a post 9-11 spiritual desert
no. 31, shared Nov. 26, 2001
Entitled: The Kingdom's Lost Teaching of Empowering Group Love by Fritz Springmeier
This manna is about an ideal. Perhaps we will only get glimpses of the glory
that God had intended for us, & never attain this ideal. But ideals, even if
never attained, serve a purpose. Christ mentions 3 times in a prayer for
believers "that they may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that
they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me." A
few pages further in Scripture, we see "Now all who believed were together,
and had all things in common..So continuing daily with one accord." We see the
ideal happening in Acts 2.
When I prayed with intensity to God for the solution to the New World Order, I
was told that the answer was for the Body of Christ to function like it was
intended to function. The model that we use today for the church is that of an
aggregation of individuals, often practicing pietism, coming together
(aggregating together) on a Sunday, or in some instances Friday or Saturday.
But the Body was to function as an entity that was in communication &
cooperation & intimacy and proximity just like an actual body. Every cell of
your body is in constant communication with the rest of the body. We were to
be animated by the same Spirit, and each of us lined up with what the Spirit
of God was doing.
The ability of love to heal & empower is amazing. All the more so with group
love, for it has a synergy of healing & empowerment. Love has both a soft side
(like watering & fertilizing our orchard) and a hard side (like pruning &
spraying our orchard). A rose has both soft petals & hard thorns. We need a
balance of firmness and forgiveness. We need a balanced deep love.
This manna message is an introduction to that ideal, which I call "Christian
community". It's the only vehicle for believers to really implement the love
we are called to give each other, such as bearing one another's burdens. The
words "Christian community" terrify many Christians, because they naturally
impose their own concept upon the terms. For the sake of this manna article,
please disregard your preconceived ideas of what the term means. I am not
using it as others would. In this manna, the term "Christian community" would
mean something like the dynamic Acts 2 ekklesia, (a Spirit-led organism, a
koinonia). Christians look forward to being in community for a short
time-which they call church camp, but have trouble translating that into a
broader concept because of the social engineering that has been perpetrated.
First, before your blood pressure goes up, let me assure you I am not trying
to start any group. The World Order has done a good job conditioning people to
have an automatic fear of Christian community. Years ago when I went about
mentioning the term, I was surprised how many people's eyes glazed over and
they began getting Jim Jones-type images when they thought of Christians
coming together. It's interesting how well the World Order has linked certain
concepts. Even long prior to 9-11 if you mentioned Arab the word that most
came to people's mind was "terrorist". If you mentioned "baby", many people
robotically thought "overpopulation". So relax I'm not trying to start a
group. I write this manna for your edification, not mine, nor for my own
benefit. Christians have so much fear about the whole subject including being
tainted with the label "cult"; they can't even begin to approach the ideal
that Christ prayed for. They have been well conditioned on this Orwellian Big
Bro. "thought crime". Just remember the original church was also called a
cult. What we are really discussing in this article is a vehicle through which
Christians can share each other's burdens and deeply be one and in love within
the Body of Christ. We are discussing the solution to the New World Order,
where the Body functions as a real live body, not an aggregation of disjointed
feuding parts (competing institutionalized state corporations). Speaking about
the enemy, Daniel saw a prophetic vision about when the end comes, "And when
he [the enemy] shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy
people, all these things shall be finished." There is no doubt that part of
the enemy's agenda is to divide & conquer us.
In recent decades, God has placed a vision of Christian community into the
hearts of various believers. I made a point to discover these believers and to
try to learn from them. I have yet to experience anything as intense as
Christ's ideal (like Acts 2). I have been in small close-knit Spirit-led
groups that began to approach the spiritual level needed. And I had been in
Amish communities that functioned as semi self-sufficient close-knit groups,
who were able to rely upon themselves for much of what material, skill, and
labor was needed. But I had never been in exactly what the Spirit was
revealing. After God's revelation I studied the Scriptures for clues to what
the Body was to be like. I visited various Christian communities, which had a
vision similar to what the Spirit revealed to me. I searched for written
accounts by other Christians who had started communities, and I prayed.
One of the things I learned was that starting a community is different from
maintaining one. Initially, people come from various backgrounds. They are not
on the same page. Somehow a balanced approach has to be made to get everyone
on the same page, while respecting his or her free will to learn from God.
This is not easy. It would be easier to put everyone through some kind of
spiritual boot camp to get everyone on the same page. We are advised, "Make
every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace." EPH
4:3 We are also taught "Each member belongs to all the others." RM 12:5 And
"Honor one another above yourself." RM 12:10 "Accept one another, then, just
as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God." RM 15:7
Another lesson is that once people experience such things as real group agape,
someone taking care of their animals while they are gone, and the pleasures &
cost savings of community gardens, they begin to warm up to the multitude of
benefits. There are benefits they most likely did not experience as
individuals, unless they've lived in an extended family (as other cultures
do). As it is written, "serve one another in love". The Anabaptist groups have
typically had a sense of Christian community. Some make a point of setting
their young people up debt free in productive jobs. The church loans money
interest free, or donates, to get the young people started in life without
debt. In turn, as they become productive, they help others.
The geographic area (I saw in prayer) where God pointed to have a community,
turned out later to be the same point where God also showed more than half a
dozen other Christians (totally independent of me). Very interesting. One
Christian in Wash. D.C. had this area revealed to him in a dream!
Several matters concerning this revelation are worthy of note. When I
investigated creating a community in that area, the U.N. moved armored
vehicles into the vicinity. Next, some of the people to whom I shared God's
revelation of community, in turn shared these ideas with a particular NSC
double-agent, who then created his own Christian community. It reminded me of
the apostolic days when Christ created a church, and soon Satan had to have
his own counterfeit ones. Finally, God revealed to me that in order for the
Christian church (and by extension any attempt at community) to have any
chance, we needed to be able to root out and deal with the mind-controlled
robots that the World Order was infiltrating into all Christian groups. I
spent the next seven years on this.
Now, the season has changed. Now besides Christian community, another concept
that is worthwhile for Christians to explore is cell groups (which bear some
resemblances to families, but need to be tighter than the average Amer.
family.). Cell groups might be from 3 to 12 persons, who in turn negotiate
their relationships with and projects with other cell groups. A cell group
should be a cohesive mind set with similar values & goals. The idea of the
cell group is that it is tight enough to be safe from outside threats as well
as internal infighting. It would be nice if it had alternate living options
and safe places.
The Harlot's tricks of the trade that the Body needs to discard. We are being
betrayed by what is false within: by what is false within ourselves, our
churches, our communities & our nation.
Somehow Christians have to unlearn much of the denominational garbage that has
divided them. Christians also have to unlearn lots of our bad habits. For
instance, Christ taught us to clean the inside of the cup (the heart) before
we worry about the outside (outward appearance). Honestly now, when it comes
to getting ready for church, Christians have the habit of spending lots of
time getting outwardly clean, doing their hair, getting their suits pressed,
(even cleaning their cars) and this prep time for the outside exceeds the time
devoted to getting their hearts right for the Sunday service. But then our
churchianity doesn't give "lay" Christians much of a role in church. This
practice of a laity should be tossed. It's not scriptural. We are all called
to serve and to share. The churches are used to create mind-controlled sheep.
Just sit in the pew and bleat when called upon. Only the minister is generally
considered "holy", and therefore is often called "reverend". This is the
Master Pastor concept, which is unbiblical and also should be tossed. It's
time we got rid of the "one Christian church" idea. Everyone is a minister,
and should use the gifts God gave him or her so the Body can function in the
strength it was meant to function in. Yes, there are leaders, but Christ
taught that leadership means to serve.
Some of our spiritual garbage are those things which follow:
The Doctrine of Closure, which is my label for how the churches get people to
believe they already understand all there is to know about Christ and his
Spirit, so they deny his Spirit its 3 primary job responsibilities, which are
to make Christ known, reveal Him & the Father. Winds of Doctrine, (cf EPH
4:14) which is how ministers accept the latest spiritual fad because of the
"prevailing winds" of thought. This is often coupled to a fear of blasphemy,
so that discernment is turned off, and weird things (created by a spirit of
mass hypnosis) are done right in the churches. I'm talking about people being
"slain in the spirit" and barking like dogs, etc. The Numbers Pump vs.
Discipling: a disciple is one who denies himself, follows Christ, and picks up
his cross, but people today think a disciple is one who attends a "milk
serving" discipling class. The Money Pump, where the ministers use
sophisticated techniques to pump the money out of their congregations. Another
one is the glorification of scholars and dollars. Another is to mistake the
absence of conflict as being peace, when genuine peace is absence of strife
with God. Finally, there is the Gnostic fallacy that the material world should
be neglected, when in reality the physical is connected to the spiritual. By
ignoring our physical surrounding, we may insure the failure of the spiritual.
These are just a few of the putrid pieces of spiritually dead garbage clogging
up our churches.
Some thoughts from Scripture about Christian community.
One of the first big hurdles is doctrine. Often professing Christians divide
into two almost irreconcilable camps. One camp holds that unity should not be
based on doctrine, so therefore doctrine is not important, because unity is
what is most precious. The other camp says that doctrine is important, so
unless we agree on doctrine we cannot work together in unity. There is
actually some Scriptural truth in both viewpoints, but both sides are really
missing the real point, and the deeper issues.
We all realize the importance of eating, and we all recognize that certain
basic nutrients are needed to be healthy. But none of us insist that everyone
else eat the very same thing. It is possible for us to realize the importance
of training our spirits, minds, and consciences in godly ways, without having
to have everyone else be at the same spiritual learning point as ourselves.
God meets people wherever they are at and works with them, why can't we? Is
our pride getting in the way? Unity is the path of humility.
The path of humility begins with the New Birth, the prerequisite for
citizenship in the Kingdom (MT 5:20). Christ's Bride is to manifest the
Kingdom of God in the world. It is meant to function with the full range of
government, including health care, deliverance from oppression of the devil
and sin (freedom), old age retirement security (heaven), restoration, and
comfort. Luke in Acts 1:6-8 equates the coming of the Spirit to the coming of
the Kingdom. Scripture shows that both the Bridegroom & the Bride prepare for
the heavenly Marriage Supper of the Lamb. One of the important ways is to have
the oil of the Holy Spirit, lest one be found wanting. One can't be part of
the Bride and not love (abide in) Christ, the Bridegroom. In fact, the Bride
is called a spiritual "caste virgin" (2 COR 11:2). The body of the Bride is
not a bunch of disjointed parts. She is beautiful. She "is one body and one
Spirit, just as you were called to one hope that belongs to your call, one
Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of us all, who is above all
and through all and in all." EPH 4:4-6 So Christ has chosen a bride that is
compatible with himself.
Meanwhile the Harlot (apostate church) is wantonly making a big scene of
herself and is trying to draw attention to herself. The enemy also infiltrates
evil workers and legalists into the Body, which Paul had to warn about in
numerous scriptures including PLP 3:3-10.
In fact, Christ considers the unity of the different parts of the body
essential "that they may be one in us: that the world may believe that Thou
hast sent me." But this is not a superficial or artificial unity. The Bride
does not lean unto her own understanding.
When the Bride gets a fresh leading of the Spirit, rather than putting this
back into old dead institutions that have failed, the Bride should make a new
wineskin (new community of believers) for new wine. The knowledge of building
chairs is important to Christians especially for having a community, but it is
not in the Bible. Likewise, other important facets of community are simply not
going to be spelled out in the Bible, the Christian is going to have to use
wisdom given from God to work these things out. Ask and you will receive
wisdom.
In community, we are ask to bear one another's burdens (GAL 6:2). This is
where community is an advantage. Sharing common goals, developing humility (a
servant's attitude), and learning social & domestic skills are all positive
steps towards community. Christian community is a way a life. It is a way of
life where we give life to each other & build each other up in love. Some of
us today are not ready to walk in the Spirit, we need walkers & crutches.
To bear one another's burdens, we have to know what they are and also be
generally close enough to carry them in some way. We must give attention to
know & care about our brothers and sisters, and resist turning to music,
football, sitcoms and other distractions. The Mass media, esp. television, is
a great fragmenter of families, and by extension also communities. Although
many of us realize if we don't hang together, we will hang separately, we
maintain barriers to other Christians because of our fears. The World Order
constantly works to create those fears. Rather than face our fears, we justify
& rationalize our obsessions with privacy & a lack of transparency. We look
forward to a close fellowship with other good Christians, but how are we going
to have it, if we are afraid to share our lives?
People need space to grow together. If things are taken in steps, rather than
attempting to do everything at once, people get time to let their barriers
down, and to build trust. From one level of cooperation to a deeper level of
cooperation, we grow together in stages. It is time for the Bride to be rising
up & getting ready --cf. S. of S. 2:10,13. The Song of Solomon has long been
considered prophecy. The armed guards protecting the Bride in Solomon's bed
(S. of S. 3:7,8) show how protective God's ministers should be over the
Bride.
And this "community love" is the love that Christ prayed for us to have, and
is what he staked his reputation on. It is almost a lost teaching today.
Something that is a risk to even mention. Something the Spirit told me would
overcome the world.
Forward to Spiritual Manna 32
Spiritual manna in a post 9-11 spiritual desert
no. 31, shared Nov. 26, 2001
Entitled: The Kingdom's Lost Teaching of Empowering Group Love by Fritz Springmeier
This manna is about an ideal. Perhaps we will only get glimpses of the glory
that God had intended for us, & never attain this ideal. But ideals, even if
never attained, serve a purpose. Christ mentions 3 times in a prayer for
believers "that they may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that
they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me." A
few pages further in Scripture, we see "Now all who believed were together,
and had all things in common..So continuing daily with one accord." We see the
ideal happening in Acts 2.
When I prayed with intensity to God for the solution to the New World Order, I
was told that the answer was for the Body of Christ to function like it was
intended to function. The model that we use today for the church is that of an
aggregation of individuals, often practicing pietism, coming together
(aggregating together) on a Sunday, or in some instances Friday or Saturday.
But the Body was to function as an entity that was in communication &
cooperation & intimacy and proximity just like an actual body. Every cell of
your body is in constant communication with the rest of the body. We were to
be animated by the same Spirit, and each of us lined up with what the Spirit
of God was doing.
The ability of love to heal & empower is amazing. All the more so with group
love, for it has a synergy of healing & empowerment. Love has both a soft side
(like watering & fertilizing our orchard) and a hard side (like pruning &
spraying our orchard). A rose has both soft petals & hard thorns. We need a
balance of firmness and forgiveness. We need a balanced deep love.
This manna message is an introduction to that ideal, which I call "Christian
community". It's the only vehicle for believers to really implement the love
we are called to give each other, such as bearing one another's burdens. The
words "Christian community" terrify many Christians, because they naturally
impose their own concept upon the terms. For the sake of this manna article,
please disregard your preconceived ideas of what the term means. I am not
using it as others would. In this manna, the term "Christian community" would
mean something like the dynamic Acts 2 ekklesia, (a Spirit-led organism, a
koinonia). Christians look forward to being in community for a short
time-which they call church camp, but have trouble translating that into a
broader concept because of the social engineering that has been perpetrated.
First, before your blood pressure goes up, let me assure you I am not trying
to start any group. The World Order has done a good job conditioning people to
have an automatic fear of Christian community. Years ago when I went about
mentioning the term, I was surprised how many people's eyes glazed over and
they began getting Jim Jones-type images when they thought of Christians
coming together. It's interesting how well the World Order has linked certain
concepts. Even long prior to 9-11 if you mentioned Arab the word that most
came to people's mind was "terrorist". If you mentioned "baby", many people
robotically thought "overpopulation". So relax I'm not trying to start a
group. I write this manna for your edification, not mine, nor for my own
benefit. Christians have so much fear about the whole subject including being
tainted with the label "cult"; they can't even begin to approach the ideal
that Christ prayed for. They have been well conditioned on this Orwellian Big
Bro. "thought crime". Just remember the original church was also called a
cult. What we are really discussing in this article is a vehicle through which
Christians can share each other's burdens and deeply be one and in love within
the Body of Christ. We are discussing the solution to the New World Order,
where the Body functions as a real live body, not an aggregation of disjointed
feuding parts (competing institutionalized state corporations). Speaking about
the enemy, Daniel saw a prophetic vision about when the end comes, "And when
he [the enemy] shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy
people, all these things shall be finished." There is no doubt that part of
the enemy's agenda is to divide & conquer us.
In recent decades, God has placed a vision of Christian community into the
hearts of various believers. I made a point to discover these believers and to
try to learn from them. I have yet to experience anything as intense as
Christ's ideal (like Acts 2). I have been in small close-knit Spirit-led
groups that began to approach the spiritual level needed. And I had been in
Amish communities that functioned as semi self-sufficient close-knit groups,
who were able to rely upon themselves for much of what material, skill, and
labor was needed. But I had never been in exactly what the Spirit was
revealing. After God's revelation I studied the Scriptures for clues to what
the Body was to be like. I visited various Christian communities, which had a
vision similar to what the Spirit revealed to me. I searched for written
accounts by other Christians who had started communities, and I prayed.
One of the things I learned was that starting a community is different from
maintaining one. Initially, people come from various backgrounds. They are not
on the same page. Somehow a balanced approach has to be made to get everyone
on the same page, while respecting his or her free will to learn from God.
This is not easy. It would be easier to put everyone through some kind of
spiritual boot camp to get everyone on the same page. We are advised, "Make
every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace." EPH
4:3 We are also taught "Each member belongs to all the others." RM 12:5 And
"Honor one another above yourself." RM 12:10 "Accept one another, then, just
as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God." RM 15:7
Another lesson is that once people experience such things as real group agape,
someone taking care of their animals while they are gone, and the pleasures &
cost savings of community gardens, they begin to warm up to the multitude of
benefits. There are benefits they most likely did not experience as
individuals, unless they've lived in an extended family (as other cultures
do). As it is written, "serve one another in love". The Anabaptist groups have
typically had a sense of Christian community. Some make a point of setting
their young people up debt free in productive jobs. The church loans money
interest free, or donates, to get the young people started in life without
debt. In turn, as they become productive, they help others.
The geographic area (I saw in prayer) where God pointed to have a community,
turned out later to be the same point where God also showed more than half a
dozen other Christians (totally independent of me). Very interesting. One
Christian in Wash. D.C. had this area revealed to him in a dream!
Several matters concerning this revelation are worthy of note. When I
investigated creating a community in that area, the U.N. moved armored
vehicles into the vicinity. Next, some of the people to whom I shared God's
revelation of community, in turn shared these ideas with a particular NSC
double-agent, who then created his own Christian community. It reminded me of
the apostolic days when Christ created a church, and soon Satan had to have
his own counterfeit ones. Finally, God revealed to me that in order for the
Christian church (and by extension any attempt at community) to have any
chance, we needed to be able to root out and deal with the mind-controlled
robots that the World Order was infiltrating into all Christian groups. I
spent the next seven years on this.
Now, the season has changed. Now besides Christian community, another concept
that is worthwhile for Christians to explore is cell groups (which bear some
resemblances to families, but need to be tighter than the average Amer.
family.). Cell groups might be from 3 to 12 persons, who in turn negotiate
their relationships with and projects with other cell groups. A cell group
should be a cohesive mind set with similar values & goals. The idea of the
cell group is that it is tight enough to be safe from outside threats as well
as internal infighting. It would be nice if it had alternate living options
and safe places.
The Harlot's tricks of the trade that the Body needs to discard. We are being
betrayed by what is false within: by what is false within ourselves, our
churches, our communities & our nation.
Somehow Christians have to unlearn much of the denominational garbage that has
divided them. Christians also have to unlearn lots of our bad habits. For
instance, Christ taught us to clean the inside of the cup (the heart) before
we worry about the outside (outward appearance). Honestly now, when it comes
to getting ready for church, Christians have the habit of spending lots of
time getting outwardly clean, doing their hair, getting their suits pressed,
(even cleaning their cars) and this prep time for the outside exceeds the time
devoted to getting their hearts right for the Sunday service. But then our
churchianity doesn't give "lay" Christians much of a role in church. This
practice of a laity should be tossed. It's not scriptural. We are all called
to serve and to share. The churches are used to create mind-controlled sheep.
Just sit in the pew and bleat when called upon. Only the minister is generally
considered "holy", and therefore is often called "reverend". This is the
Master Pastor concept, which is unbiblical and also should be tossed. It's
time we got rid of the "one Christian church" idea. Everyone is a minister,
and should use the gifts God gave him or her so the Body can function in the
strength it was meant to function in. Yes, there are leaders, but Christ
taught that leadership means to serve.
Some of our spiritual garbage are those things which follow:
The Doctrine of Closure, which is my label for how the churches get people to
believe they already understand all there is to know about Christ and his
Spirit, so they deny his Spirit its 3 primary job responsibilities, which are
to make Christ known, reveal Him & the Father. Winds of Doctrine, (cf EPH
4:14) which is how ministers accept the latest spiritual fad because of the
"prevailing winds" of thought. This is often coupled to a fear of blasphemy,
so that discernment is turned off, and weird things (created by a spirit of
mass hypnosis) are done right in the churches. I'm talking about people being
"slain in the spirit" and barking like dogs, etc. The Numbers Pump vs.
Discipling: a disciple is one who denies himself, follows Christ, and picks up
his cross, but people today think a disciple is one who attends a "milk
serving" discipling class. The Money Pump, where the ministers use
sophisticated techniques to pump the money out of their congregations. Another
one is the glorification of scholars and dollars. Another is to mistake the
absence of conflict as being peace, when genuine peace is absence of strife
with God. Finally, there is the Gnostic fallacy that the material world should
be neglected, when in reality the physical is connected to the spiritual. By
ignoring our physical surrounding, we may insure the failure of the spiritual.
These are just a few of the putrid pieces of spiritually dead garbage clogging
up our churches.
Some thoughts from Scripture about Christian community.
One of the first big hurdles is doctrine. Often professing Christians divide
into two almost irreconcilable camps. One camp holds that unity should not be
based on doctrine, so therefore doctrine is not important, because unity is
what is most precious. The other camp says that doctrine is important, so
unless we agree on doctrine we cannot work together in unity. There is
actually some Scriptural truth in both viewpoints, but both sides are really
missing the real point, and the deeper issues.
We all realize the importance of eating, and we all recognize that certain
basic nutrients are needed to be healthy. But none of us insist that everyone
else eat the very same thing. It is possible for us to realize the importance
of training our spirits, minds, and consciences in godly ways, without having
to have everyone else be at the same spiritual learning point as ourselves.
God meets people wherever they are at and works with them, why can't we? Is
our pride getting in the way? Unity is the path of humility.
The path of humility begins with the New Birth, the prerequisite for
citizenship in the Kingdom (MT 5:20). Christ's Bride is to manifest the
Kingdom of God in the world. It is meant to function with the full range of
government, including health care, deliverance from oppression of the devil
and sin (freedom), old age retirement security (heaven), restoration, and
comfort. Luke in Acts 1:6-8 equates the coming of the Spirit to the coming of
the Kingdom. Scripture shows that both the Bridegroom & the Bride prepare for
the heavenly Marriage Supper of the Lamb. One of the important ways is to have
the oil of the Holy Spirit, lest one be found wanting. One can't be part of
the Bride and not love (abide in) Christ, the Bridegroom. In fact, the Bride
is called a spiritual "caste virgin" (2 COR 11:2). The body of the Bride is
not a bunch of disjointed parts. She is beautiful. She "is one body and one
Spirit, just as you were called to one hope that belongs to your call, one
Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of us all, who is above all
and through all and in all." EPH 4:4-6 So Christ has chosen a bride that is
compatible with himself.
Meanwhile the Harlot (apostate church) is wantonly making a big scene of
herself and is trying to draw attention to herself. The enemy also infiltrates
evil workers and legalists into the Body, which Paul had to warn about in
numerous scriptures including PLP 3:3-10.
In fact, Christ considers the unity of the different parts of the body
essential "that they may be one in us: that the world may believe that Thou
hast sent me." But this is not a superficial or artificial unity. The Bride
does not lean unto her own understanding.
When the Bride gets a fresh leading of the Spirit, rather than putting this
back into old dead institutions that have failed, the Bride should make a new
wineskin (new community of believers) for new wine. The knowledge of building
chairs is important to Christians especially for having a community, but it is
not in the Bible. Likewise, other important facets of community are simply not
going to be spelled out in the Bible, the Christian is going to have to use
wisdom given from God to work these things out. Ask and you will receive
wisdom.
In community, we are ask to bear one another's burdens (GAL 6:2). This is
where community is an advantage. Sharing common goals, developing humility (a
servant's attitude), and learning social & domestic skills are all positive
steps towards community. Christian community is a way a life. It is a way of
life where we give life to each other & build each other up in love. Some of
us today are not ready to walk in the Spirit, we need walkers & crutches.
To bear one another's burdens, we have to know what they are and also be
generally close enough to carry them in some way. We must give attention to
know & care about our brothers and sisters, and resist turning to music,
football, sitcoms and other distractions. The Mass media, esp. television, is
a great fragmenter of families, and by extension also communities. Although
many of us realize if we don't hang together, we will hang separately, we
maintain barriers to other Christians because of our fears. The World Order
constantly works to create those fears. Rather than face our fears, we justify
& rationalize our obsessions with privacy & a lack of transparency. We look
forward to a close fellowship with other good Christians, but how are we going
to have it, if we are afraid to share our lives?
People need space to grow together. If things are taken in steps, rather than
attempting to do everything at once, people get time to let their barriers
down, and to build trust. From one level of cooperation to a deeper level of
cooperation, we grow together in stages. It is time for the Bride to be rising
up & getting ready --cf. S. of S. 2:10,13. The Song of Solomon has long been
considered prophecy. The armed guards protecting the Bride in Solomon's bed
(S. of S. 3:7,8) show how protective God's ministers should be over the
Bride.
And this "community love" is the love that Christ prayed for us to have, and
is what he staked his reputation on. It is almost a lost teaching today.
Something that is a risk to even mention. Something the Spirit told me would
overcome the world.
Forward to Spiritual Manna 32
CNN, SPLC Propaganda Falsely Connects Hutaree to the Real Patriot Movement
From http://www.infowars.com/cnn-splc-propaganda-connects-hutaree-to-patriot-movement/
CNN, SPLC Propaganda Connects Hutaree to Patriot Movement
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 30, 2010
John Avlon, author of “Wingnuts,” and the CIA operative Anderson Cooper decided not to demonize Alex Jones on CNN last week. He made too much sense. Instead, on Monday, they “profiled” the Hutaree group. It is ideal for their propaganda campaign.
Both Avalon and Mark Potok of the SPLC basically said if you believe the elite are actively planning for a New World Order and world government based on the model of the EU you’re on par with the Hutaree who believe the UN is the Antichrist and were ready to do battle with it, no matter how ludicrous that is.
Cooper mentioned the discredited DHS report on “rightwing extremism” and said it is now “prescient in terms of the violence we have seen.” Potok said DHS boss Janet Napolitano was a coward for disavowing the report. He accidentally called her Janet Reno, the butcher of Waco. There is little difference.
Cooper did not bother to cite any incidents of violence. Was he talking about obscene calls and emails sent to Congress after it passed Obamacare? Or the cut gas line at the brother of a Congress critter’s house? Or bricks thrown through windows at Dem headquarters around the country? Are the last two violence or property damage? Is there a difference according to the government and the corporate media? No. Foolish acts of property damage in response to authoritarianism, according to the corporate media — who are micromanged by the CIA and Pentagon — mean Hutaree-like militias are about to begin killing cops and government bureaucrats.
Avalon said “hate” ultimately leads to “violence.” He meant to say that free speech not approved by the government leads to criticism of the one-world agenda and such criticism and critiques will not be tolerated by our rulers. Beyond the raving of an isolated group of white supremacists, there is virtual no talk of violence by patriots and other critics of the New World Order.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
The federal indictment against the Hutaree is tenuous at best. It claims the group planned to kill cops. It looks like the cop killer scenarios were part of their training exercises — basically glorified paintball wars in the woods with live ammo — and not an active conspiracy.
Or maybe it is the “gun charges” mentioned in the indictment. The feds love to bring these kind of charges against their victims. They act like there is no Second Amendment and anybody who owns a military styled firearm is a raving lunatic. They blow everything out of proportion. Pipe bombs become weapons of mass destruction and IEDS in order to conjure up images of Iraq and Afghanistan. None of this is accidental. It’s all part of the propaganda campaign.
Avalon connected the killing of three Pittsburgh cops by the spoiled brat Richard Poplawski to the patriot movement. Avalon and CNN have created a new word for people who defend the Constitution — they are “hateriots” instead of patriots. The script scribblers in the corporate media love to invent new terms to demonize their enemies.
It is almost certain a jury will find these folks guilty and send them to prison for life. In the meantime, the corporate media will have a field day connecting non-violent patriots to the Hutaree. Images of a fringe Christian group playing war in the woods will be mixed in with images of Tea Party protesters and Ron Paul supporters.
The Hutaree may believe the End Days are near and there will be a confrontation with the Antichrist. The Hutaree’s millennial fantasies have provided the government with an excuse to demonize those of us who know there is indeed such a thing as a ruling global elite and a well documented plan for world government. The corporate media itself has announced these plans on numerous occasions.
How long before the government conducts more raids, this time on legitimate militias? How long before the government and corporate media begin calling for disarmament of Americans who practice open carry and defend the Second Amendment? How long before a provocateured event gives them the perfect excuse?
CNN, SPLC Propaganda Connects Hutaree to Patriot Movement
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 30, 2010
John Avlon, author of “Wingnuts,” and the CIA operative Anderson Cooper decided not to demonize Alex Jones on CNN last week. He made too much sense. Instead, on Monday, they “profiled” the Hutaree group. It is ideal for their propaganda campaign.
Both Avalon and Mark Potok of the SPLC basically said if you believe the elite are actively planning for a New World Order and world government based on the model of the EU you’re on par with the Hutaree who believe the UN is the Antichrist and were ready to do battle with it, no matter how ludicrous that is.
Cooper mentioned the discredited DHS report on “rightwing extremism” and said it is now “prescient in terms of the violence we have seen.” Potok said DHS boss Janet Napolitano was a coward for disavowing the report. He accidentally called her Janet Reno, the butcher of Waco. There is little difference.
Cooper did not bother to cite any incidents of violence. Was he talking about obscene calls and emails sent to Congress after it passed Obamacare? Or the cut gas line at the brother of a Congress critter’s house? Or bricks thrown through windows at Dem headquarters around the country? Are the last two violence or property damage? Is there a difference according to the government and the corporate media? No. Foolish acts of property damage in response to authoritarianism, according to the corporate media — who are micromanged by the CIA and Pentagon — mean Hutaree-like militias are about to begin killing cops and government bureaucrats.
Avalon said “hate” ultimately leads to “violence.” He meant to say that free speech not approved by the government leads to criticism of the one-world agenda and such criticism and critiques will not be tolerated by our rulers. Beyond the raving of an isolated group of white supremacists, there is virtual no talk of violence by patriots and other critics of the New World Order.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
The federal indictment against the Hutaree is tenuous at best. It claims the group planned to kill cops. It looks like the cop killer scenarios were part of their training exercises — basically glorified paintball wars in the woods with live ammo — and not an active conspiracy.
Or maybe it is the “gun charges” mentioned in the indictment. The feds love to bring these kind of charges against their victims. They act like there is no Second Amendment and anybody who owns a military styled firearm is a raving lunatic. They blow everything out of proportion. Pipe bombs become weapons of mass destruction and IEDS in order to conjure up images of Iraq and Afghanistan. None of this is accidental. It’s all part of the propaganda campaign.
Avalon connected the killing of three Pittsburgh cops by the spoiled brat Richard Poplawski to the patriot movement. Avalon and CNN have created a new word for people who defend the Constitution — they are “hateriots” instead of patriots. The script scribblers in the corporate media love to invent new terms to demonize their enemies.
It is almost certain a jury will find these folks guilty and send them to prison for life. In the meantime, the corporate media will have a field day connecting non-violent patriots to the Hutaree. Images of a fringe Christian group playing war in the woods will be mixed in with images of Tea Party protesters and Ron Paul supporters.
The Hutaree may believe the End Days are near and there will be a confrontation with the Antichrist. The Hutaree’s millennial fantasies have provided the government with an excuse to demonize those of us who know there is indeed such a thing as a ruling global elite and a well documented plan for world government. The corporate media itself has announced these plans on numerous occasions.
How long before the government conducts more raids, this time on legitimate militias? How long before the government and corporate media begin calling for disarmament of Americans who practice open carry and defend the Second Amendment? How long before a provocateured event gives them the perfect excuse?
Economic News in late March 2010
http://christianinfobomb.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=17913
For the US the same is true, so that's why you see economic warfare starting, bets against eac other's currencies.If you can't come out of it anymore, you still can drag downt he other and so artificially give yourself just the advantage you need.but the other, if it'sa comparable power, comes back...you drag eachother down with a very high price tag.
They all should cooperate and make a plan for coming decades and then use a tobin tax to rebuilt some physical economy, some gold, some other assets thathedge up debts and derivatives. Then confidence can return as well and the direction we're going is positive again.But if these big powers are being engaged in economic warfare, then we're all gonna collapse sooner or later.
-Flying Dutch
____________
Also Canadas economy is lagging behind, not in a very deep recession yet it seems...at least less bad than in the USA.
So if Canada's unemployment claism per week or per month are onefith compared to the US, while it's population is just above one tenth of that of the Us, you know somebody in the US must belying about it's figures, cause Canada is not going to make itself looklike worse on purpose, it obviously uses more honest figures.
As both economies are fairly comparable, the income per capita is almost equal too, there cannot be a terribly big change.
Quote:
Compared to the stated U.S. job losses of 600,000, Canada has lost 129,000 jobs in January. The population of the U.S. is around 300 million compared to 30 million in Canada. Therefore in comparison with the U.S., Canada should have only lost around 60,00 jobs. The figure of 129,000 means that Canada's unemployment figures are over double what would have been expected. Either that or the U.S. figures are being artificially under-reported.
The US should have 10 times this 129,000 figure that Canada has AT LEAST, at least because the Canadian economys is running less bad than that of the USright now.
So according to sucha figures the US figure for January could eb easily 1.5 million or even 2 million.
-Flying Dutch
____________________________
Paul Craig Roberts was a member of the Mont Pelerin Society but he quit - looks like he turned on them recently. He wrote an article calling for Protectionism which is against Free Market dogma.
-Revolt 426
_________________
For the US the same is true, so that's why you see economic warfare starting, bets against eac other's currencies.If you can't come out of it anymore, you still can drag downt he other and so artificially give yourself just the advantage you need.but the other, if it'sa comparable power, comes back...you drag eachother down with a very high price tag.
They all should cooperate and make a plan for coming decades and then use a tobin tax to rebuilt some physical economy, some gold, some other assets thathedge up debts and derivatives. Then confidence can return as well and the direction we're going is positive again.But if these big powers are being engaged in economic warfare, then we're all gonna collapse sooner or later.
-Flying Dutch
____________
Also Canadas economy is lagging behind, not in a very deep recession yet it seems...at least less bad than in the USA.
So if Canada's unemployment claism per week or per month are onefith compared to the US, while it's population is just above one tenth of that of the Us, you know somebody in the US must belying about it's figures, cause Canada is not going to make itself looklike worse on purpose, it obviously uses more honest figures.
As both economies are fairly comparable, the income per capita is almost equal too, there cannot be a terribly big change.
Quote:
Compared to the stated U.S. job losses of 600,000, Canada has lost 129,000 jobs in January. The population of the U.S. is around 300 million compared to 30 million in Canada. Therefore in comparison with the U.S., Canada should have only lost around 60,00 jobs. The figure of 129,000 means that Canada's unemployment figures are over double what would have been expected. Either that or the U.S. figures are being artificially under-reported.
The US should have 10 times this 129,000 figure that Canada has AT LEAST, at least because the Canadian economys is running less bad than that of the USright now.
So according to sucha figures the US figure for January could eb easily 1.5 million or even 2 million.
-Flying Dutch
____________________________
Paul Craig Roberts was a member of the Mont Pelerin Society but he quit - looks like he turned on them recently. He wrote an article calling for Protectionism which is against Free Market dogma.
-Revolt 426
_________________
Monday, March 29, 2010
The Strange Case of Kristopher Sickles and the Hutaree Militia
From http://www.infowars.com/the-strange-case-of-kristopher-sickles-and-the-hutaree-militia/
The Strange Case of Kristopher Sickles and the Hutaree Militia
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 29, 2010
One of the men arrested in the FBI and Homeland Security raids on the Hutaree Militia in Michigan last weekend appeared on the Alex Jones Show in 2009 after it was widely suspected he was a government operative.
Kristopher Sickles, aka “Pale Horse,” produced a film about serial murder in 2009.
Kristopher Sickles, aka “Pale Horse” (a reference to the late William Cooper’s book Behold a Pale Horse), is named in the federal indictment against members of the Hutaree Militia. He is reportedly a member of the Ohio Militia.
It turns out he is probably not a government operative as originally suspected — at least not consciously — and is instead a mentally ill individual who joined the Hutaree in order to realize his perverse fantasies.
In October of 2008, Sickles posted a video on YouTube. Dressed in military fatigues, wearing a camouflaged balaclava over his face, and cradling an AR-15 carbine, he calls on Americans to arm themselves. “Things are bad. Things are real bad, and it’s going to be a lot worse — our country is in peril,” he declares. The video was viewed more than 70,000 times before YouTube removed it.
In April of the following year, Pale Horse posted another video on YouTube. In the second video, he calls for a demonstration of at least one million armed militia men marching on Washington. “No shooting, no one gets hurt. Just a demonstration,” he explains. “The only difference from any typical demonstration is we will all be armed.” He specifically mentions Alex Jones in the video.
Soon after the first video drew attention, accusations arose that Sickles, then known only as Pale Horse, was a government operative and his video was specifically designed to portray legitimate state militias in a negative and sinister light. In fact, the corporate media did use the Ohio Militia video as part of its campaign to demonize the patriot movement in 2009.
On August 17, 2009, Alex Jones interviewed Pale Horse after the corporate media exploited him as part of its ongoing propaganda offensive.
“Either you were doing this to get attention, knowing that putting this mystique on [Pale Horse's use of a voice changer in the video], as you call it, would make the media pick up on what you were saying — because it was useful to them — or you are a Adam Gadahn type fed or foundation hired person meant to make the militias look dangerous and fringe and bad,” said Jones.
Members of the Hutaree Militia in federal custody. Kristopher T. Sickles is second from the left on the second row.
Adam Gadahn is the American media spokesman for al-Qaeda and widely regarded as an intelligence operative. Gadahn is the first American charged with treason by the U.S. government since 1952.
Alex characterized Pale Horse’s video effort as an “art project” intended to draw attention to himself and the Ohio Militia. During the interview, Sickle described himself and the Ohio Militia as legitimate and not part of a disinformation or intelligence operation designed to discredit the larger militia movement. See the video below.
According to the Irregular Times, however, there is a darker and more perverse side to Kristopher Sickles. He is not a constitutionalist or mainstream militia member. “For Kristopher Sickles, who used the Hutaree pseudonym ‘Pale Horse,’ Christianity served as a perfect combination of righteous indignation and an excuse to behave in inexcusable ways. In particular, Sickles found in Christianity an excuse to kill people.”
Sickles released a film in 2009 he had written and directed entitled Dement Incarnate. The main character of the film is a serial killer who is depicted reveling in the slaughter of a young child. Sickles created a MySpace page on the film.
The fascination Sickles has with serial killing is particularly fascinating when it is considered in the context of a shorter film Sickles made: American Jihad. That video depicts a fantasy sequence of a businessman happening upon an Islamic terrorist hideout in rural Michigan. Men in camouflage shout Muslim catch phrases as they torture and kill the businessman. The interesting thing is that the deadly terrorists, in their rural Michigan hideout, are quite like the group Kris Sickles aligned himself with. The only difference is that the Hutarees practice a different religion.
We now know that Kristopher Sickles, as Alex Jones speculated, is little more than a self-absorbed poseur who lives in a violent fantasy world. The Hutaree Militia allowed him the possibility of realizing his warped and sadistic fantasies.
Irregular Times continues:
Considering American Jihad [another violent film produced by Sickles], we see that Pale Horse Kris Sickles was, consciously or not, using these videos he created as a way of contemplating his own violent desires. In both videos, he copes with his own guilty interest in killing by depicting the murderers as his enemies: Muslims and other non-Christians. However, as much as he attempts to place the urge to murder outside of himself, the reflection of Sickles’s own fascination emerges clear as day. The very sadism he accuses others of in order to justify their murder is a cruelty he harbors within himself.
The Michigan Militia quickly moved to put an end to any speculation that it was associated with the Hutaree Militia. On the United States Militia message board yesterday, a post emphatically decried any association:
Please convey to the fools that are propagating this dis-information that it is the Hutaree, an extreme right Christian group that has been targeted and members from Ohio… along with some people affiliated with the Hutaree. I can tell you that the Michigan Militia Corp Wolverines, SMVM, WMVM, WCMVM and any other affiliated units of ours have NOT been targeted and we have no knowledge of any Michigan Militia member being arrested. The Hutaree is NOT the Michigan Militia and they are NOT a Constitutional based militia but rather a biblical based militant group.
As of this writing, it appears Mr. Sickles is not a government operative, although as history repeatedly demonstrates the FBI is not beyond exploiting such mentally unstable individuals in its effort to demonize the establishment’s enemies.
Sickles is entirely responsible for his fate. His association with the Hutaree is more about his violent fantasies than restoring the republic and demanding the federal government respect and obey the Constitution.
Vatican/Jesuit links shown in 2010
| QUOTE (Douglas Willinger @ Mar 29 2010, 04:43 AM) | The whole 'jew basher' think is intrinsically illogical for targeting DNA rather then institutions that provide the organizeable chains of command- after all they are called "orders'). Of course we know why they target Jewsih DNA (rather then say the doctrinal absurdities, as that would go towards questioning doctrinal absurdities in general). |
That's right. With their mind set it's enough to totally corrupt you (aka making you "work for the Zionists") if your wife has Jewish heritage, similar story with Hitler, or your last name sounds Jewish or whatever. Not a word about proven loyalties, who financed and trained people and most important one: which master people serve right now in this lifetime. That's what they call "research" then
Or they quote the Talmud ad infinitum. To this I say: what is more binding, the bloody oaths of secret societies like the Jesuit order or the instructions of an old religious book, not to mention that many Jews will not follow let alone even know that book (-> you need the hierarchical infrastructure to control the NWO).My updated compilation for the Jew bashers here:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mi...0&#entry3055050
Older collection of quotes showing the pretended emnity between Jesuits and Freemasonry, now updated:
| QUOTE | „A subtle provision in Vox clamantis transferred most Templar estates to the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, who took possession after King Philip's death. In Germany and Austria, the Templars became ‚Rosicrucians’ and ‚Teutonic Knights.’ The Teutonic Knights grew strong in Mainz, birthplace of Gutenberg's press. Six centuries later, as the ‚Teutonic Order,’ the Knights would provide the nucleus of Adolf Hitler's political support in Munich and Vienna. The Edinburgh lodge would become the headquarters of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, which Masonic historians call ‚American Freemasonry’ because all but five of the signers of the Declaration of Independence are said to have practiced its craft. In Spain andPortugal the Templars became the ‚Illuminati’ in whom Iñigo had taken membership at Manresa, and ‚Knights of Christ.’ It was under the red pattée cross of the Knights of Christ that Columbus had taken possession of what he called ‚las Indias’ for King Ferdinand V of Spain, grandfather of Iñigo's discreet patron, Charles I and V, the Holy Roman Emperor. As early as August of 1523, as I hypothesized in the previous chapter, this vast yet fragmented subterranean empire – Roman Catholizism's unseen root-system binding together the world – belonged to Iñigo de Loyola. His spiritual dynasty, which continues to this day, would use this system to cause God-fearing men who hated the papacy to perform, without realizing it, exactly how the papacy wanted them to.” [...] „The Inquisition's effect, of course, was to send the more resourceful of the ‚heretics, Protestants and Liberals’ who escaped torture or execution scurrying underground, or into the burgeoning world of commerce, or into regions where Protestant civil authorities kept Inquisitors at bay. Yearning for a less intrusive religious experience, they joined attractive philosophical fraternities where they could speak freely against Roman Catholizism. For this ostensible reason, these fraternities or cults or lodges operated in secrecy. In fact, they were the remnants of the Templar network – Rosicrucians, Teutonic Knights, the numerous and various rites of Freemasonry. Like the Templars and the Jesuits, they were religious hierarchies of strict obedience. They differed from the Jesuits, however, in that their pyramid culminated in an ultimate authority no brother could identify with certainty. The highest master of a Lodge received commandments from an ‚Unknown Superior,’ a Superior whose will the master's whole struggle up the degrees had trained him to obey without question. What the masters never realized was that this mysterious personage, as we shall examine in more detail later, was in fact none other than the Black Pope.” [...] „Freemasonry was the natural, the reasonable, the only intelligent way for the Roman Catholic Church to control ( a ) the ongoing affront of Protestantism, ( b ) the increase in ‚divine right’ kings heading their own national churches independent of Vatican control, and ( c ) the incredible explosion of international mercantilism. [...] The Jesuit General is the disembodied eye substitutin for the pyramid's missing capstone, the stone the builders rejected. [...] Both Freemasonry and the Society of Jesus are ( a ) humanist religious orders, ( b ) secretive, ( c ) fraternal, ( d ) socially conscientious and politically active – questing, like Aeneas, the prototypical Roman, for the greatest good for the greatest number. Both orders ( e ) hold Tradition, Reason, and Experience in equal if not greater esteem than the Bible, ( f ) employ carefully structured programs of gnostic visualization to achieve an ever-increasing knowledge of the divine, ( g ) condone ‚the end justifies the means,’ and ( h ) require absolute obedience, secured by blood oath, to a hierarchy of superiors culminating in the Jesuit General, whose orders are so wisely suited to the recipient that they are obeyed as though willed by the recipient himself.” Tupper Saussy: „Rulers Of Evil”, pages 40-41, 58-59, 120-121 |
| QUOTE | „Mathew Ramsey, a Scotch gentleman, and writer on the subject, believed that Freemasonry had its origin with the Knights Templar. Between the date of its inception at Jerusalem, in 1118 and 1314, the Order of Knights Templars had become a powerful and wealthy organization. They recognized allegiance to no power above that Church, of which the Pope was the recognized head.” Anthony W. Ivins: „The Relationship of 'Mormonism' and Freemasonry” , 1934 |
| QUOTE | „It is curious to note too that most of the bodies which work these, such as the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, the Rite of Avignon, the Order of the Temple, Fessler's Rite, the ‚Grand Council of the Emperors of the East and West -- Sovereign Prince Masons,’ etc., etc., are nearly all the offspring of the sons of Ignatius Loyola. The Baron Hundt, Chevalier Ramsay, Tschoudy, Zinnendorf, and numerous others who founded the grades in these rites, worked under instructions from the General of the Jesuits. The nest where these high degrees were hatched, and no Masonic rite is free from their baleful influence more or less, was the Jesuit College of Clermont at Paris.” Letter of the Freemason/Theosophist Charles Sotheran to the New York Press Club, 11th of January 1877 |
| QUOTE | „It's just like Freemasonry. The lower have no idea that the High Shriner Freemasons are working for the Jesuit General. They think that they're just doing works and being good people. But the bottom line is that the high-level Freemasons are subject, also, to the Jesuit General because the Jesuit General, with Fredrick the Great, wrote the High Degrees, the last 8 Degrees, of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry when Fredrick protected them when they were suppressed by the Pope in 1773. So, you have the alignment with the Jesuit Order and the most powerful Freemason they had in the craft, Fredrick the Great, during their suppression. That is an irrefutable conclusion. And then, when you see the Napoleonic Wars, the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars carried out by Freemasonry, everything Napoleon did, and the Jacobins, whatever they did, completely benefited the Jesuit Order.” Eric Jon Phelps, Spectrum magazine interview http://www.whale.to/b/pope.html http://www.govsux.com/black_pope.htm |
| QUOTE | „The Jesuits wrote the first 25 rites of Scottish Freemasonry in then College de Clermont in Paris in 1754” „Chevalier de Bonneville formed a chapter of twenty-five Degrees of the so-called High-Degrees in the College of Jesuits of Clermont, in Paris in 1754. The adherents of the House of Stuart had made the college of Clermont their asylum, they being mostly Scotchmen. One of these Degrees being the ‚Scottish Master,’ the new body organized in Charleston, S.C., in 1801, gave the name of Scottish Rite to these Degrees, which name ever since that time has characterized the Rite all over the world.” William Peterson: „Ask Me Another, Brother” http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...logID=244943949 |
| QUOTE | „There are still old ladies, male and female, about the country, who will tell you, with grim gravity that, if you trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you come to the grand tip-top, head Mason of the World, you will discover that the dread individual and the Chief of the Society of Jesus are one and the same person!” James Parton, American Historian: „The Life of Horace Greeley”, 1855 |
| QUOTE | „There is considerable analogy between Masonic and Jesuitic degrees; and the Jesuits also tread down the shoe and bare the knee, because Ignatius Loyola thus presented himself at Rome and asked for the confirmation of the order.” Charles William Heckethorn, English Historian: „Secret Societies of all Ages and Countries”, 1875 |
| QUOTE | „This inner and invisible Freemasonry is international in extent, and it is within the Inner Circle that the Jesuits conceal themselves, work, and mastermind the projects that suit their goals.” „Without exception, every chief actor in the French Revolution [1789-1799] was either Jesuit-educated, a Catholic prelate, or a member of the Illuminati Order where within the Jacobin Club they would come together to conspire and carry out the ‚Great Work’ – which in the open system of the Jacobins was the reflection of the complete hidden system of the Illuminati – and in back of the Illuminati were the hidden Jesuit ‚masters’.” „The truth is that the Jesuits of Rome have perfected Freemasonry to be their most magnificent and effectiv tool, accomplishing their purposes among Protestants”. John Daniel: „The Grand Design Exposed”, pages 170, 212-213, 302 |
| QUOTE | „Freemasonry is another branch of the Babylonian Mysteries, which has survived under different names from the time of the fall of open pagan worship in the 5th century. …Freemasonry is just as ripe for manipulation by the Jesuits and the Church of Rome, that it may be used for the purposes of Rome, as any Protestant denomination. …In Britain and the USA, Freemasonry appears as a ‚Christian’ organization. However, this is a most dangerous pretense, for the true god of Freemasonry is Lucifer, who is Satan appearing as an angel of light. …Both Freemasonry and the Church of Rome [at their highest levels] worship the same god… Masonic ceremonies implicitly deny the sufficiency of Scripture. …[Freemasonry] is particularly strong in many Baptist churches in the USA… Those in the lower levels of Freemasonry know nothing about the higher and even more secretive degrees.” I. A. Sadler: „Mystery, Babylon the Great”, 2003; pages 175-181 |
| QUOTE | „The higher I went in the Jesuit Order, the more corruption I saw within the institution. I was invited to attend a secret black mass by high-ranking Jesuits [including Superior General Pedro Arrupe] in a monastery in the northern part of Spain. When I knelt to kiss the ring of a high official, I saw a symbol on that ring that made my blood run cold. It was a Masonic symbol [the compass and the square]! A thing I hated and I had been told to fight against it... I found out the Jesuit General was also a Mason and a member of the Communist Party in Spain." Alberto Rivera, Spanish Ex-Jesuit: „The Godfathers”, 1979 http://www.chick.com/reading/comics/0362/0...pages.asp?pg=25 |
| QUOTE | “Bonneville, Nicolas de. An historian and literateur, born at Evreux, in France, March 13, 1760. He was the author of a work, published in 1788, entitled, Les Jesuites chassis de Maconnerie et leur poignard brise par les Macons, divided into two parts of the first of which the sub-title was, La Maconnerie ecossaise comparee avec les trois professions et le Secret des Templiers de 14e Siecle; and of the second, Memete des quatre voeux de la Compagnie de S. Ignace, et des quatre grades de la Maconnerie de S. Jean. . . . His Masonic theory was that the Jesuits had introduced into the symbolic degrees the history of the life and death of the Templars, and the doctrine of vengeance for the political and religious crime of their destruction; and that they had imposed upon four of the higher degrees the four vows of their congregation [the Society of Jesus].” Albert G. Mackey, 33rd Degree, American Masonic Historian: „Encyclopedia of Freemasonry” , 1917 |
| QUOTE | “Bode, Johann Joachim Christoph. Born in Brunswick, 18th of January, 1730. One of the most distinguished Masons of his time. . . . in 1757 he established himself at Hamburg as a bookseller, and was initiated into the Masonic Order. . . . To Masonic literature he made many valuable contributions; among others, he translated from the French [Nicolas de] Bonneville’s celebrated work entitled Les Jesuites chasses de la Maconnerie et leur poignard brise par les Macons, which contains a comparison of Scottish Masonry with the Templarism of the fourteenth century. In 1790 he joined the order of the Illuminati, obtaining the highest degree in its second class, and at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad [1782] he advocated the opinions of Weishaupt. No man of his day was better versed than he in the history of Freemasonry, or possessed a more valuable and extensive library; no one was more diligent in increasing his stock of Masonic knowledge, or more anxious to avail himself of the rarest sources of learning. Hence, he has always held an exhalted position among the Masonic scholars of Germany. The theory which he had conceived on the origin of Freemasonry—a theory . . . [b]was that the Order was invented by the Jesuits, in the seventeenth century, as an instrument for the re-establishment of the Roman Church in England, covering it for their own purposes under the mantle of Templarism.” Albert G. Mackey, 33rd Degree, American Masonic Historian: „Encyclopedia of Freemasonry”, 1917 |
| QUOTE | “. . . the Jesuits were driven to co-operate with the other two international brotherhoods, the Freemasons and the Jews [Rothschild’s Illuminati], in the destruction of the Spanish Empire.” Salvador de Madariaga, Spanish Statesman: „The Jesuits”, 1820 |
| QUOTE | “....we have confirmed the Induction of the Knights Templar Masons into the Councils of the said Order of Knighthood... and hoping and confiding that he will ever so demean himself as to conduct to the glory of I.H.S the Most Holy and Almighty GOD, ... and to the honor of his MARK, we recommend...” David Bernard, „Light on Freemasonry”, 1858; orig. published in 1829, p. 195 |
And two sources in German:
| QUOTE | „Auch jene Erkenntnis, von der ich schon geschrieben habe, daß in den obersten Etagen der höchsten Logen und Orden die Unterschiede von Konfessionen und politischen Ansichten verschwinden, wird von ihm bestätigt: ‚Mögen sich auf den unteren Ebenen Freimaurerei und Jesuitismus und damit der Katholizismus noch so sehr bekämpfen, in ihren obersten Spitzen stimmen beide überein, mag das noch so abwegig erscheinen.... Nunmehr trat Kardinal Wojtyla als Papst Johannes Paul II. sein Amt in Rom an. Er erhielt von der gesamten freimaurerischen Weltpresse überschwengliche begeisterte Zustimmung und hob mit Wirkung des 27.11.1983 (Beginn des Kirchenjahres und 1. Advent) die im Codex luris Canonici weltweit ausgesprochene Exkommunikation der Freimaurer auf.’ [Heinz Pfeifer: „Brüder des Schattens”, S. 234,236]” Dieter Rüggeberg: „Geheimpolitik - Der Fahrplan zur Weltherrschaft” |
| QUOTE | „Daher haben Sie sowohl im Jesuitismus wie im Freimaurertum eine Fortsetzung derselben Zeremonien bei den Einweihungen wie in den alten Strömungen. Die Einweihung der Kirche im Jesuitismus hat die vier Grade: coadjutores temporales, scholares, coadjutores spirituales, professi. Die Grade der Einweihung in der eigentlichen okkulten Freimaurerei sind ähnlich. Sie laufen einander parallel.” Rudolf Steiner: „Die Tempelgrade und die goldene Legende” [??? - source could not be verified] -Quintessenz |