Monday, January 31, 2011
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Is the Egyptian Government Using Agents Provocateur to Justify a Crack Down On the Protesters?
From http://www.infowars.com/is-the-egyptian-government-using-agents-provocateur-to-justify-a-crack-down-on-the-protesters/
Is the Egyptian Government Using Agents Provocateur to Justify a Crack Down On the Protesters?
Washington’s Blog
January 30, 2011
Al Jazeera reported today:
[Al Jazeera reporter] Ayman Mohyeldin reports that eyewitnesses have said “party thugs” associated with the Egyptian regime’s Central Security Services – in plainclothes but bearing government-issued weapons – have been looting in Cairo. Ayman says the reports started off as isolated accounts but are now growing in number.The Telegraph reports:
“Thugs” going around on motorcycles looting shops and houses, according to Al Jazeera. They say they are getting more and more reports of looting. More worryingly, one group of looters who were captured by citizens in the upmarket Cairo district of Heliopolis turned out to have ID cards identifying them as members of the regime security forces.Similarly, Egyptian newspaper Al MasryAlyoum provides several eyewitness accounts of agents provacateur:
Thugs looting residential neighborhoods and intimidating civilians are government-hires, say eyewitnesses.
In Nasr City, an Eastern Cairo neighborhood, residents attempting to restore security told Al-Masry Al-Youm that looters were caught yesterday.
“They were sent by the government. The government got them out of prison and told them to rob us,” says Nameer Nashaat, a resident working alongside other youths to preserve order in the district. “When we caught them, they said that the Ministry of Interior has sent them.”
In Masr al-Qadeema, another district, scrap metal dealer Khaled Barouma, confirmed the same account. “The government let loose convicts. They let them out of prisons. We all know them in this neighborhood,” he said, adding that the neighborhood’s youth is trying to put the place in order by patrolling its streets with batons.
“The government wants people to believe that this is an uprising of convicts, which is not the case. The government is the one that is a criminal,” Khalil Fathy, a local journalist covering the events closely, said.
In Rehab City, a wealthy gated community in New Cairo, masked thugs broke through a civilian barricade in a truck and were caught by a neighborhood watch that has been guarding the city this evening.
“Even though we caught the ones we saw, now that they’re in, we know that more will be coming and we’re all running to protect our families and houses,” said Karim el-Dib, one of the men guarding the community.
Meanwhile, protestors caught two police informants attempting to rob a bank in the Mediterranean city of Alexandria.
Ayman Nour, opposition leader and head of the Ghad Party, told Al-Masry Al-Youm that his fellow party members have caught several thugs who work forthe Interior Ministry. After capturing them in downtown Cairo and Heliopolis, Nour’s followers found ministry of interior IDs on them, Nour said.
“The regime is trying to project the worst image possible to make it clear to people that they have only one of two alternatives: either the existing order or chaos,” he said.
Scores of looting incidents have been reported since yesterday. Many residential neighborhoods have been attacked by thugs and ex-convicts, despite military presence.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Bikyamasr reports:
Eyewitnesses reported that one plain clothed man attempted to loot and destroy private property, and when confronted he was shot. Bystanders then took his identification out and revealed that he was a police officer, leaving a number of demonstrators to argue that the government has told police to instigate looting and unrest.And American intelligence service Stratfor provides the following unconfirmed report today:
Security forces in plainclothes are engaged in destroying public property in order to give the impression that many protesters represent a public menace.
As I noted in 2008:
When agents provocateur commit violence or destroy property at peaceful protests, they are carrying out false flag terrorism.And as I pointed out last year:
Wikipedia defines false flag terror as follows:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.If intelligence agencies or federal, state or local police themselves commit acts of violence against people or property, and then blame it on peaceful protesters, that is – by definition – false flag terror.
***
Read this to see how eagerly the mainstream media are to pin acts of violence on peaceful protesters, instead of the thugs who actually committed them.
And if you don’t know about agents provocateur, read this statement about Burma:
“They’ve ordered some soldiers in the military to shave their heads, so that they could pose as monks, and then those fake monks would attack soldiers to incite a military crackdown. The regime has done this before in Burma, and we believe they would do so again.”And see this news from Canada, and this Wikipedia discussion.
- United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
- Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers
- At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence
Sarkozy Goes Postal On Jamie Dimon, Says Bankers Made World Into Madhouse (More Words from Flying Dutch)
http://christianinfobomb.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22967
Court halts transfer of stake in Dutch nuclear plant
http://www.expatica.com/
The Dutch Supreme Court placed an interim freeze Friday on plans to transfer a 50 percent stake in the Netherla... < Dutch news | Expatica The Netherlands
http://www.expatica.com/nl/news/dutch-n%20...%2024666.html
GOOD! No privatization...already happened last years...and selling of our power grid, certainly not nuclear reactors!!
-Flying Dutch
Court halts transfer of stake in Dutch nuclear plant
http://www.expatica.com/
The Dutch Supreme Court placed an interim freeze Friday on plans to transfer a 50 percent stake in the Netherla... < Dutch news | Expatica The Netherlands
http://www.expatica.com/nl/news/dutch-n%20...%2024666.html
GOOD! No privatization...already happened last years...and selling of our power grid, certainly not nuclear reactors!!
Better keep state owned power grid, in case you get war and other countries own your power grid, you will get some big troubles. Energy independence is one of the most important things of a sovereign nation state, it´s the economic backbone of a country.
I´ve nothing against Germany, fine country, but i just believe this way, no matter where the company trying to buy up our nuclear plants is coming from.I think Germans are thinking similar, they like to keep things German i noticed.The power grid is so important!!
I´ve nothing against Germany, fine country, but i just believe this way, no matter where the company trying to buy up our nuclear plants is coming from.I think Germans are thinking similar, they like to keep things German i noticed.The power grid is so important!!
-Flying Dutch
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Inequality In America Is Worse Than In Egypt, Tunisia Or Yemen
From http://www.infowars.com/inequality-in-america-is-worse-than-in-egypt-tunisia-or-yemen/
Inequality In America Is Worse Than In Egypt, Tunisia Or Yemen
Washington’s Blog
January 29, 2011
Egyptian, Tunisian and Yemeni protesters all say that inequality is one of the main reasons they’re protesting.
However, the U.S. actually has much greater inequality than in any of those countries.
Specifically, the “Gini Coefficient” – the figure economists use to measure inequality – is higher in the U.S.
[Click for larger image]
Gini Coefficients are like golf – the lower the score, the better (i.e. the more equality).
According to the CIA World Fact Book, the U.S. is ranked as the 42nd most unequal country in the world, with a Gini Coefficient of 45.
In contrast:
• Tunisia is ranked the 62nd most unequal country, with a Gini Coefficient of 40.And inequality in the U.S. has soared in the last couple of years, since the Gini Coefficient was last calculated, so it is undoubtedly currently much higher.
• Yemen is ranked 76th most unequal, with a Gini Coefficient of 37.7.
• And Egypt is ranked as the 90th most unequal country, with a Gini Coefficient of around 34.4.
So why are Egyptians rioting, while the Americans are complacent?
Well, Americans – until recently – have been some of the wealthiest people in the world, with most having plenty of comforts (and/or entertainment) and more than enough to eat.
But another reason is that – as Dan Ariely of Duke University and Michael I. Norton of Harvard Business School demonstrate – Americans consistently underestimate the amount of inequality in our nation.
As William Alden wrote last September:
Americans vastly underestimate the degree of wealth inequality in America, and we believe that the distribution should be far more equitable than it actually is, according to a new study.Here’s the study:
Or, as the study’s authors put it: “All demographic groups — even those not usually associated with wealth redistribution such as Republicans and the wealthy — desired a more equal distribution of wealth than the status quo.”
The report … “Building a Better America — One Wealth Quintile At A Time” by Dan Ariely of Duke University and Michael I. Norton of Harvard Business School … shows that across ideological, economic and gender groups, Americans thought the richest 20 percent of our society controlled about 59 percent of the wealth, while the real number is closer to 84 percent.
Crisis in Egypt
America Secretly Trained Rebel Leaders To Hijack Egyptian Protests
CNBC Host Erin Burnett Implies America Should Support Foreign Dictators To Keep Flow Of Cheap Oil
While Egyptians Take To The Streets, Americans Accept Their Enslavement
Webster Tarpley: CIA Fuels ‘Mob Rule’ in Arab World to Change Power
Obama Criticizes Internet Kill Switch In Egypt While His Own Administration Tries To Ram It Through In America
Mohamed ElBaradei: Globalist Pied Piper Of The Egyptian Revolt
Mohamed ElBaradei: Globalist Pied Piper Of The Egyptian Revolt
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, January 29, 2011
The revolt in Egypt is an organically driven people-power movement to oust a dictator, restore universal freedoms, and wrestle the country free from the clutches of the US military-industrial complex, but the man now being positioned to form a new government is a pied piper working for the very same globalists and NGO’s that autocrat leader Hosni Mubarak has dutifully served for nearly 30 years.
Make no mistake about it, under the current regime Egypt is a vassal state for the new world order. Under Mubarak, the country receives some $2 billion in aid every year from the United States, second only to Israel. In addition, Egypt pays out $1.1 million annually to the Podesta Group, an organization closely tied with the Obama administration, to act as “foreign agents” for Mubarak’s regime.
Mubarak’s loyalty to the US empire was reciprocated this week when Vice-President Joe Biden ludicrously asserted that Mubarak’s unbroken 30 year reign did not represent a dictatorship and that he was a close ally of the west.
“Egypt under Mubarak uses its billions in U.S. military aid to detain, beat and torture dissenters, opposition politicians and journalists; many have died in custody,” writes Mark Zepezauer. “Thousands of political prisoners and pro-democracy activists are held in overcrowded, disease-ridden prisons, without charges or trials. Press restrictions, including newspaper shutdowns, are widespread.”
Which is why it makes no sense whatsoever for the CIA to be involved in contriving a series of riots that would destabilize and threaten to topple a regime loyal to them. This is not the type of staged “color revolution” that we’ve witnessed before in places like Georgia, the Ukraine or Yugoslavia – orchestrated events disguised as spontaneous uprisings intended to remove rogue leaders hostile to the global elite’s agenda for world government.
This is a grass roots movement being carried out by impoverished young Egyptians finally standing up in unison to a regime that toadies to the west yet allows its people none of the freedoms associated with living in a modern and prosperous nation. But that doesn’t mean the revolution we currently see unfolding on the streets of Alexandria, Cairo, Suez and cannot be co-opted by the very same globalist forces who have been pulling Mubarak’s strings for the past three decades.
The US military-industrial complex has known for at least three years that Egypt was teetering on the verge of regime change, and they certainly were not going to let anyone outside parties take control after Mubarak’s fall. That’s why the American Embassy trained rebel leaders to infiltrate opposition groups from the very beginning, as the Telegraph reveals today.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Enter former top UN official and staunch Mubarak adversary Mohamed ElBaradei, who recently returned to Cairo in a bid to lead the protest movement.
ElBaradei serves on the Board of Trustees of the International Crisis Group, who today issued a press release protesting the decision on behalf of Egyptian authorities to place ElBaradei under house arrest.
International Crisis Group is a shadowy NGO (non-governmental organization) that enjoys an annual budget of over $15 million and is bankrolled by the likes of Carnegie, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as George Soros’ Open Society Institute. Soros himself serves as a member of the organization’s Executive Committee. In other words, this is a major geopolitical steering group for the global elite.
The fact that their man ElBaradei is being primed to head up the post-Mubarak government should set alarm bells ringing in the ears of every demonstrator who is protesting in the name of trying to wrestle Egypt away from the clutches of new world order control.
Indeed, even Mubarak himself is now seemingly catching on to the understanding that his usefulness to the global power elite has run its course, remarking during a national address Saturday that the protests were “part of a bigger plot to shake the stability and destroy the legitimacy” of the political system.
Even more ironic is the fact that another powerful globalist who sits on the board of International Crisis Group, Zbigniew Brzezinski, warned last year that the international hierarchyof which he is a key component was under threat from a “global awakening” that would be led by young radicals in third world countries. Having accurately predicted the wave of revolt now spreading like wildfire across the globe, Brzezinski and his fellow globalists are preparing to pick up the pieces in order to continue business as usual, while the people who risked their lives for real change will be the victims of a monumental deception. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
If the Egyptians are successful in toppling Mubarak, only to replace him with ElBaradei, they will have achieved nothing, and the eventual outcome will merely see Egypt remain as a subservient client state of the US military-industrial complex.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Revolution, and a new time in 2011
Today, there is rioting and protests in Egypt. People sincerely want liberty and real human rights in Egypt. Egypt is run by the Sunni Hosni Musbarak. Hosni have banned the Internet and put some people in house arrest. Folks in Egypt, the Arab world, and other places worldwide desire radical reforms that come against authoritarianism. Now, this new Revolution is related to the technological age. This era of the Internet, twitter, Scribd.com, etc. have made the truth more readily avaliable than any other time in history. There are calls for reforms in Cairo. The American government is trying to have a tightrope in promoting balance in the Middle East (to use Egypt as a bulwark against "extremists"). Some fear that the Muslim Brotherhood might take over Egypt if the present Egyptian government is overthrown. Yet, one thing is true. People have the right to legitimately call for real freedoms or real reforms in any nation. There are tanks in Egypt in allowing the authorities to try to take control of the nation. Some believe that NGOs might exploit the situation in order to control region of the Middle East. Many young people in the Middle East are tired of the autocrats and the theocrats trying to dominate the lives of human beings. This is history in the making. This is the first in many decades where a large portion of the Middle East having nations whose leadership could embrace real human rights. At least 58 people have died in Egypt and rising food prices is one contributing factors on why the protests have occured in the first place (along with calls for human rights reforms inside of the vicinity of Egypt).
2011 is a new era in politics and other concepts of life. Now, President Barack Obama wants to have consensus with the GOP to get his agenda going. This was expressed in his 2011 State of the Union address. He wants to freeze domestic spending for five years, cut corporate tax rates, and wait for that trickle of capital to flow. Barack Obama in the State of the Union address didn’t talk about unemployment (effecting blacks, Latinos, Asians, whites, etc.). Freezing finances is silly during a time when poverty is wrecking havoc in communities nationwide. Wall Street isn’t going to radically help the common people at all. Repacking items from the past don’t work either. There is nothing wrong with innovation, self invention, etc. but if you’re not having policies to help the poorest of the poor (then you’re agenda will not be really effective among all demographics of America). Public sector jobs are declining. Sputnik from 1957 caused the United States to spending a lot of money on education. Under the Obama/GOP austerity era, this isn’t going to occur. The President does want real spending in some area and he promotes the Race to the Top Program. This educational system allows privately managed and publicly financed alternative national charter school system (a multi-billion dollar market for hedge funds plus speculators). Public educational infrastructure has been cut too. The corporate tax rate cut will be loved by the wealthy. These profits will accrue companies to hoard over 2 trillion dollars. This new bipartisan consensus is about slick reactionary tactics to get the establishment’s agenda moving along. Today, we have to seek community improvement instead of popular acclaim. We should disagree with the long U.S. military occupation in Afghanistan too along with the unjust bombing of Pakistan. So, the propagandists for the Republicans or Democrats have no excuse. Communities now are being spied upon and coming from assault by crooked police. Unions are being destroyed when some unions have protected populations. It's silly to assume that the President is a socialist when he's acting more center left. That's tell you how radical some Republicans are.
The V logo has been an occult logo for thousands of years. I realize that resistors of the Nazis during WWII in France have shown the V. Yet, this isn't about them. This is about the V in occult circles. Some use the V for Victory in a meaning. The pro-JBS person Alex Jones is trying to use the V symbol in trying to protest the policies of the Department of Homeland Security. History, the V symbol dealt with the occult and evil. During WWII, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill showed the V symbol for Victory. Yet, many people don't realize something. Winston Churchill was a Freemason and was a member of the Order of the Druids. According to the book Perdurabo: The Life of Aleister Crowley by Richard Kaczynski, the V symbol that was used by Churchill actually originated from the famous occultist Aleister Crowley. Crowley decided it would be best to use the V symbol as an occult means to counter the Nazi swastika because in Hebrew it means "nail" which he felt would serve as a representation of "nails' in the coffin for Adolf Hilter and the Nazis. Aleister Crowley believed in his "The Book of Toth" that the V symbol represented the ancient false deities of Apophis and Typhon. Apophis is known as Apep (or the evil god of chaos and darkness). Apophis is associated with the underworld and as an eater of souls. The V symbol has many other meanings, but this information alone proves that this is certainly no some wholesome patriotic symbol. The V image is found in the movie V for Vendetta (it's a film with occult symbols). V for Vendetta sympathatizes with the Jesuit Gunpowder plot that deals with violent revolution, mind control, Christian bashing, etc. The film was based on the the comic series by the same name by the occultist & magician Alan Moore. Moore is a Gnostic and claimed that a false god Glycon. Moore created another comic named "The Watchmen," which was turned into a movie that contains tons of occult symbolism and teachings. The V system is promoted in the View and in the V TV series from ABC (that deals with reptilian like aliens invading the planet). This image is related to the occult, evil, or a special occasion. Even stranger is that one of the V poster submissions that has since been published and described as an excellent entry on the InfoWars web site contains the very suspicious phrase "We Are Legion". This is a bizarre term considering that there is a little known Catholic based organization called "The Legion of Christ." Legion is found in the New Testament of a group of demons. The Legion of Christ is a Catholic group that its founder Marcial Maciel was proved to be involved in sexual molestation and other immoral behavior. Legion also relates to a Roman military unit. Alex Jones knows this history and still uses the symbol. We don't need flames of a potential new civil war in America. Using the V symbol doesn't prove our dissent when we can use tons of other alternatives to promote dissent to the nefarious tactics of Homeland Security. The Law of Fives is one interpretation of the V hand sign as well.
Occult symbols are found in the murals of the Bank of America. These murals are found in Charlotte, North Carolina. These images look strange. Some either predict in the not so distant future or present the goal of many globalists of a radical world change. The new world order has been a real goal of Utopians spanning thousands of years. These paintings were done by Benjamin Long. They are said to deal with making/building, chaos/creativity, and planning/knowledge in a dealing with abstract art, and realism. The Charlotte Corporate Bank of America center has the 3 frescoes ruling over the lobby of the building. Some find clues in the paintings form right to life. In other words, the frescoes go from the planning stage in the right to the completion of the artistic alchemical process to the left. The fresco in the right is called planning/knowledge. It shows a Masonic red and white checkered floor pattern. Thre are business people, stairs, the burning tree, and a pyramid. The burning tree is similar to the occultic tree of life archetype. The Masonic checkered board pattern is used in the Masonic initiation ritual (where the boy's feet is placed at 90 degrees in an angle). The boy wears business suit and looks like he a part of the new generation. The blond boy is similar to the blond boy of one of the murals in the Denver International Airport (the blond boy in the DIA image has a plowshare and wearing a traditional Bavarian custume. Some allude this to the Bavarian Illuminati). The burning bush is similar to the burning bush of the OT. In Masonic rituals, members are considered to be near the Burning Bush like in the 33rd Degree. The Pyramid is obvious a symbol of the mysteries. A woman trapped inside of a transparent cube hanging from threads coming from the sky. She could be representative of a person stuck in the mateiral world (or the cube) being manipulated by forces. The stars are similar to Jacob's ladder to Heaven. There is a black sun in the mural. In Masonry, ladders are shown to represents mankind's ascendance into enlightenment or godhood. There is Illumination as promoted by Masons. The Masons believe in the 7 arts of human growth (like grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithemic, geometry, music, and astronomy). The black sun is percieved as the material world while the invsible sun is made of pure philosophical gold (in Hermetic tradition). The black sun or sol niger in Latin is the first stage of the Opus Magnum. This means that there is a blackening of crude metals first before transmutation takes place to create pure gold. The black sun is related to the Temple of Set and Nazi occult groups. The Black sun is found in the Bracken House in London (with the signs of the Zodaic as well). The black sun moving in front of the golden sun is found in the design of the DIA. The right fresco deals with the first step of the Great Work that must be done. Men dressed in suits to describe the new generation of people in the elite system. The middle fresco is a transitional period of choas. There is fighting war, disease, military people, protests, etc. worldwide. There are barb wires, nets, and soldiers to see this oppressed. A nun isn't pleased in the mural. A mural with someone with a biohazard suit describes a scenario of chemcial warfare. The DIA mural has a militaristic figure with a gas mask as well. There is a vortex mural of naked bodies in fire (or whitening in the alchemical work. Jung compared this step with daybreak, the preparation for the next and final stage, which is the sunrise, characterized by the color red. Which is, of course, the most prominent color of the left fresco). The left fresco is heavily red. It shows working using shovel to build a new world or society. Red is related to the final step of the alchemical Magnum Opus or the Rubedo (the Red Work). In real life, the occult elite want to transform society to be a new world order (as a part of the Great Work. In alchemy, material metals are changed into pure gold. In a spiritual sense, occultists believe that the profane man becomes a regenerated man via alchemical transformation). The mural shows a man sleeping in the Earth, which similar to a little boy sleeping in the DIA mural. The Knights of Malta and the elite control the Bank of America being the largest bank in America. The frescoes outline 3 stages of world transformation into the new age. These stages are planning, chaos, and achievement. There are color coded and some of the murals' images look similar to the murals of the Denver International Airport. Some symbols are related to Masonry and the Mystery schools. Those in the know realize a lot of the murals' meanings. The second fresco has unrest in order to achieve the mission. These frescoes show the elite's agenda that is hidden in plain sight. Symbols have many levels of meaning as Dr. Robert Heirmonous says, but we can know a lot about these occurences.
Many people have found images in the Indianapolis State Capitol building. It housed the General Assembly ,the Governor of Indiana, the Supreme Court of Indiana, and other state officials. The building was built in 1888. It was the fifth building to house the state government. The third building was a structure inspired by the Parthenon, but was condemned in 1877 because of structural defects and razed so the current statehouse could be built on its location.
The Indiana State Capitol has occult paintings in it as well. This has been exposed by with the YouTube name of protestantsep (or Protestant seperatist). He tried to get close up pictures of the mural. The Indiana House Chambers has these murals. The murals have people sitting down. There is an image of a man and a Goddess-like figure. The mural is called “The Spirit of Indiana.” Yet, the real title of the mural according to the contract is called, “The Apotheosis of Indiana.” Eugene Savage made the contract back in 1961. The contract is a legal and binding document. The apotheosis is once again, an old pagan concept that believes that man can achieve godhood. It’s not a secret that State capitols nationwide have Masonic/occult influence and some of their cosmology related from the pagan Temples of old. The House prayers in the state capitol of Indiana can’t invoke Jesus Christ’s name. Even the Indiana state poem reads that: “…For a Pagan voice within me seems to answer to it all.” This is paganism promoted since the early days of America. The name of the mural was changed from the Apotheosis of Indiana to the Spirit of Indiana to cover up the lawless ones (or the covert occult elite governing many affairs in our world today including American affairs). There are gods and goddesses in the painting. These characters are mythical characters. The state is depicted as a Goddess. In our time, the truth is coming out in great measure. References that deal with Christianity are banned from this Chamber, but not pagan images on the mural. Some Ten Commandments plagues are promoted by the Masonic Fraternal Order of the Eagles. The man with the hat in the painting is named William H. Harrison (or once the Masonic Governor). The apotheosis deals with trying to deify the personification of Indiana. In real life, the rulers of this land use the Mysteries not to enlighten folks, but to control the common people (while keeping real wisdom withholden from human beings).
By Timothy
Obama Administration Expresses Support For Mubarak As Protester Shot Dead In Egypt
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-administration-expresses-support-for-mubarak-as-protester-shot-dead-in-egypt.html
Authorities shut down Internet and text messaging as riots threaten to topple regime
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, January 28, 2011
The Obama administration expressed its support for under fire Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak even as footage emerged of a protester being shot dead by Mubarak’s security forces in Cairo, as the government shut down the Internet, land lines and the mobile phone network in a desperate bid to cling on to power amidst widespread rioting.
“Vice President Joe Biden spoke to the PBS NewsHour tonight with the most direct US government comments yet about the gathering Egypt protests against President Hosni Mubarak’s 29-year reign,” reports The Christian Science Monitor.
Speaking to Jim Lehrer, Biden refused to call Mubarek a dictator, and went on to lend his support to a man who presides over $1.3 billion in U.S. military aid each year.
“Mubarak has been an ally of ours in a number of things. And he’s been very responsible on, relative to geopolitical interest in the region, the Middle East peace efforts; the actions Egypt has taken relative to normalizing relationship with – with Israel. … I would not refer to him as a dictator,” said Biden, who went on to imply that some of the protesters’ demands were illegitimate.
The demonstrations are firmly centered around spiraling fuel and food prices, rising unemployment, as well as police brutality and torture of political dissidents. These factors have culminated in protesters turning on Mubarek and his regime.
“Our government is a dictatorship. A total dictatorship,” said Mohamed Fahim, a 29-year-old glass factory worker, as he stood near the charred skeleton of a car.
“It’s our right to choose our government ourselves. We have been living 29 years, my whole life, without being able to choose a president.”
The rage only intensified after authorities moved to shut down Internet access, the mobile phone network and even land lines across large areas of the country, primarily in an attempt to restrict access to the Associated Press footage showing a protester being shot dead in the street, one of at least eight victims who have been killed since the uprising began. Mubarek’s regime is also desperate to stop activists from organizing via Facebook and Twitter.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
As Tyler Durden writes, the ludicrous decision to stoke more anger and chaos by shutting down communications gives an insight into what might happen under similar conditions in America.
“Ironically this act of desperation in Egypt which seeks to prevent the ongoing televising of the revolution, would be precisely the match that would set off America on a certain path to revolution: not ongoing banker rape, not Primary Dealers stealing from babies, not Greek president G-Pap robbing your wallet… merely a shutdown of Facebook and Twitter (and possibly cable) and 300 million well-armed American will promptly go apeshit.”
Despite a myriad of justifiable reasons why Egyptians would want to stage a revolution, one wonders why it took them 29 years of Mubarek’s despotic reign to do so. Are we merely witnessing a natural domino effect from what happened in Tunisia, or are there darker forces at work? Namely, the same NGO’s and elitists that were behind previous color revolutions that were artificially contrived in order to make the target country a vassal state for the new world order?
If Egyptians are given the same “freedoms” that Americans enjoy – particularly the right to choose one of two puppet Presidents controlled by the same elite every four years – will its population be equally as angry when their country becomes the next Iraq – a conquered outpost for the new global government empire?
Egyptians are right to revolt against the tyranny they have been subjected to for almost three decades, but the most important aspect of the situation now becomes the aftermath. Should Mubarek be toppled and his regime swept away, will Egypt retain its sovereignty under a popularly elected government that serves the people, or will the country simply be picked off by encircling geopolitical vultures and turned into another frontier, another giant US/NATO military base and another stepping stone towards the invasion of Iran?
Obama Administration Expresses Support For Mubarak As Protester Shot Dead In Egypt
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, January 28, 2011
The Obama administration expressed its support for under fire Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak even as footage emerged of a protester being shot dead by Mubarak’s security forces in Cairo, as the government shut down the Internet, land lines and the mobile phone network in a desperate bid to cling on to power amidst widespread rioting.
“Vice President Joe Biden spoke to the PBS NewsHour tonight with the most direct US government comments yet about the gathering Egypt protests against President Hosni Mubarak’s 29-year reign,” reports The Christian Science Monitor.
Speaking to Jim Lehrer, Biden refused to call Mubarek a dictator, and went on to lend his support to a man who presides over $1.3 billion in U.S. military aid each year.
“Mubarak has been an ally of ours in a number of things. And he’s been very responsible on, relative to geopolitical interest in the region, the Middle East peace efforts; the actions Egypt has taken relative to normalizing relationship with – with Israel. … I would not refer to him as a dictator,” said Biden, who went on to imply that some of the protesters’ demands were illegitimate.
The demonstrations are firmly centered around spiraling fuel and food prices, rising unemployment, as well as police brutality and torture of political dissidents. These factors have culminated in protesters turning on Mubarek and his regime.
“Our government is a dictatorship. A total dictatorship,” said Mohamed Fahim, a 29-year-old glass factory worker, as he stood near the charred skeleton of a car.
“It’s our right to choose our government ourselves. We have been living 29 years, my whole life, without being able to choose a president.”
The rage only intensified after authorities moved to shut down Internet access, the mobile phone network and even land lines across large areas of the country, primarily in an attempt to restrict access to the Associated Press footage showing a protester being shot dead in the street, one of at least eight victims who have been killed since the uprising began. Mubarek’s regime is also desperate to stop activists from organizing via Facebook and Twitter.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
As Tyler Durden writes, the ludicrous decision to stoke more anger and chaos by shutting down communications gives an insight into what might happen under similar conditions in America.
“Ironically this act of desperation in Egypt which seeks to prevent the ongoing televising of the revolution, would be precisely the match that would set off America on a certain path to revolution: not ongoing banker rape, not Primary Dealers stealing from babies, not Greek president G-Pap robbing your wallet… merely a shutdown of Facebook and Twitter (and possibly cable) and 300 million well-armed American will promptly go apeshit.”
Despite a myriad of justifiable reasons why Egyptians would want to stage a revolution, one wonders why it took them 29 years of Mubarek’s despotic reign to do so. Are we merely witnessing a natural domino effect from what happened in Tunisia, or are there darker forces at work? Namely, the same NGO’s and elitists that were behind previous color revolutions that were artificially contrived in order to make the target country a vassal state for the new world order?
If Egyptians are given the same “freedoms” that Americans enjoy – particularly the right to choose one of two puppet Presidents controlled by the same elite every four years – will its population be equally as angry when their country becomes the next Iraq – a conquered outpost for the new global government empire?
Egyptians are right to revolt against the tyranny they have been subjected to for almost three decades, but the most important aspect of the situation now becomes the aftermath. Should Mubarek be toppled and his regime swept away, will Egypt retain its sovereignty under a popularly elected government that serves the people, or will the country simply be picked off by encircling geopolitical vultures and turned into another frontier, another giant US/NATO military base and another stepping stone towards the invasion of Iran?
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Clarence Thomas Failed to Report Wife’s $686K Heritage Foundation Income, 2) Heritage Foundation: Cut Entitlement, Welfare Spending
http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/1-clarence-thomas-failed-to-report-wifes-686k-heritage-foundation-income-2-heritage-foundation-cut-entitlement-welfare-spending
http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/santa-barbara-spy-school-with-far-right-ties-checkered-civil-rights-past-fronts-as-nondescript-consulting-training-firm
http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/legally-poisoned-the-law-puts-us-at-risk-from-toxicants
http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/santa-barbara-spy-school-with-far-right-ties-checkered-civil-rights-past-fronts-as-nondescript-consulting-training-firm
http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/legally-poisoned-the-law-puts-us-at-risk-from-toxicants
UN Human Rights Official Under Fire For Describing 9/11 As A Cover Up
From http://www.infowars.com/un-human-rights-official-under-fire-for-describing-911-as-a-cover-up/
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
January 26, 2011
An official working within the recently established UN Human Rights Council is under fire from an NGO closely affiliated with Israel for suggesting that the official explanation of the 9/11 attacks is a cover up.
Richard Falk, a former professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, and an expert on human rights made the comments in a blog post last week, noting that the mainstream media is “unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials.”
Falk described this version of the 9/11 story as an “apparent cover up” containing “gaps and contradictions”.
The group UN Watch, which describes itself as “an independent Geneva-based watchdog organization”, pounced on the comments, in a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, calling for Falk to be removed from his post immediately. The group described Falk’s comments as an insult to the victims of the attacks and their families and loved ones.
Hilel Neuer, the group’s chief executive, described Falk as “a serial offender with zero credibility”.
Ban Ki-Moon responded Monday by publicly condemning Falk’s comments, but added that he was not in a position to fire Falk from the Human Rights Council.
The story has since found its way into the mainstream media, however there is one vital detail that you will not read in such articles.
The UN Watch group is closely affiliated with the American Jewish Committee and has been described as “a lobby group with strong ties to Israel”. The group has been after the head of Richard Falk and others like him for years, purely because he and other human rights experts alike continue to criticize and condemn the Israeli government’s treatment of the Palestinian people.
Falk’s appointment to the Human Rights Council, as a monitor on human rights issues relating to the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs, hit headlines in 2008 owing to the fact that he has previously slammed the Israeli occupation of Palestine and compared the Zionist government’s treatment of Palestinian Arabs to the Nazi treatment of Jews in the holocaust.
As a result, the Israeli government has routinely denied Falk a visa to enter Israel, Gaza and the West Bank.
This legitimate criticism of the Zionist Israeli government gets boiled down to “Richard Falk believes that Jews are Nazis” in pieces such as this op ed in last Friday’s New York Daily News. This disgusting piece of tabloid trash suggests that Falk and his contemporaries are “apologists for dictatorships”, ironically for criticizing the actions of a vehemently racist government regime.
Falk’s position on 9/11 has remained constant. Just over two years ago he called for a fresh investigation into 9/11 in order to examine the possible role that neoconservatives may have played in the attacks.
Indeed, two days prior to his appointment to the UN Human Rights Council in March 2008, Falk appeared on former University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett’s radio show and spoke of how he was keen to see a fresh investigation into 9/11 in order to address inconsistencies in the official account of what happened.
Mr. Falk told Barrett, “It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don’t think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess.”
Falk previously penned the preface to Professor David Ray Griffin’s groundbreaking 2004 book The New Pearl Harbor, in which the theologian catalogued scores of unexplained facets surrounding 9/11 and inconsistencies in the official government version of events.
Given that the majority of those who sat on the 9/11 Investigative Commission have themselves expressed doubts about the official findings and described their roles as participation in a cover up, it is perfectly legitimate for anyone else in the world to ask questions about 9/11. In fact it should be a priority of every official in Falk’s circle to ask the same questions and raise the same doubts.
Richard Falk has continually acted as a thorn in the side of the establishment. He has published a number of notable books and essays analyzing the legality of the Vietnam War and other military operations, including the Iraq invasion.
In 2007 he played a prominent role in a Citizens’ hearing on the legality of the Iraq War as a tribunal testifier. Of the Invasion he has previously written:
There is a clear worry within the establishment that like Falk, some of the officials within the Human Rights Council are legal experts that recognize war crimes and illegitimate attacks when they see them and are actually attempting to do something about it.
This is one instance where some are attempting to work within and through the establishment left arm of the global elite system to meter out some justice.
In a 2008 interview, Japanese member of Parliament Yukihisa Fujita told the Alex Jones Show that there are numerous individuals within the UN structure that are significantly interested in pursuing the coordination of a new 9/11 investigation in order to address unanswered questions.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad)
However, it remains to be seen whether the Human Rights Council is composed of enough well meaning individuals to have a significant impact, or whether, like much of the rest of the UN, it will merely become a powerless part of the overall establishment control mechanism.
UN Human Rights Official Under Fire For Describing 9/11 As A Cover Up
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
January 26, 2011
An official working within the recently established UN Human Rights Council is under fire from an NGO closely affiliated with Israel for suggesting that the official explanation of the 9/11 attacks is a cover up.Richard Falk, a former professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, and an expert on human rights made the comments in a blog post last week, noting that the mainstream media is “unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials.”
Falk described this version of the 9/11 story as an “apparent cover up” containing “gaps and contradictions”.
The group UN Watch, which describes itself as “an independent Geneva-based watchdog organization”, pounced on the comments, in a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, calling for Falk to be removed from his post immediately. The group described Falk’s comments as an insult to the victims of the attacks and their families and loved ones.
Hilel Neuer, the group’s chief executive, described Falk as “a serial offender with zero credibility”.
Ban Ki-Moon responded Monday by publicly condemning Falk’s comments, but added that he was not in a position to fire Falk from the Human Rights Council.
The story has since found its way into the mainstream media, however there is one vital detail that you will not read in such articles.
The UN Watch group is closely affiliated with the American Jewish Committee and has been described as “a lobby group with strong ties to Israel”. The group has been after the head of Richard Falk and others like him for years, purely because he and other human rights experts alike continue to criticize and condemn the Israeli government’s treatment of the Palestinian people.
Falk’s appointment to the Human Rights Council, as a monitor on human rights issues relating to the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs, hit headlines in 2008 owing to the fact that he has previously slammed the Israeli occupation of Palestine and compared the Zionist government’s treatment of Palestinian Arabs to the Nazi treatment of Jews in the holocaust.
As a result, the Israeli government has routinely denied Falk a visa to enter Israel, Gaza and the West Bank.
This legitimate criticism of the Zionist Israeli government gets boiled down to “Richard Falk believes that Jews are Nazis” in pieces such as this op ed in last Friday’s New York Daily News. This disgusting piece of tabloid trash suggests that Falk and his contemporaries are “apologists for dictatorships”, ironically for criticizing the actions of a vehemently racist government regime.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Falk’s position on 9/11 has remained constant. Just over two years ago he called for a fresh investigation into 9/11 in order to examine the possible role that neoconservatives may have played in the attacks.
Indeed, two days prior to his appointment to the UN Human Rights Council in March 2008, Falk appeared on former University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett’s radio show and spoke of how he was keen to see a fresh investigation into 9/11 in order to address inconsistencies in the official account of what happened.
Mr. Falk told Barrett, “It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don’t think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess.”
Falk previously penned the preface to Professor David Ray Griffin’s groundbreaking 2004 book The New Pearl Harbor, in which the theologian catalogued scores of unexplained facets surrounding 9/11 and inconsistencies in the official government version of events.
Given that the majority of those who sat on the 9/11 Investigative Commission have themselves expressed doubts about the official findings and described their roles as participation in a cover up, it is perfectly legitimate for anyone else in the world to ask questions about 9/11. In fact it should be a priority of every official in Falk’s circle to ask the same questions and raise the same doubts.
Richard Falk has continually acted as a thorn in the side of the establishment. He has published a number of notable books and essays analyzing the legality of the Vietnam War and other military operations, including the Iraq invasion.
In 2007 he played a prominent role in a Citizens’ hearing on the legality of the Iraq War as a tribunal testifier. Of the Invasion he has previously written:
“inescapable that an objective observer would reach the conclusion that this Iraq war is a war of aggression, and as such, that it amounts to a Crime against Peace of the sort for which surviving German leaders were indicted, prosecuted and punished at the Nuremberg trials conducted shortly after the Second World War.”The UN Human Rights Council has been afforded little opportunity to function in any meaningful way. It has met stiff opposition at every turn from the US Congress and was recently described by the chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs as a “rogues’ gallery” for “pariah states”.
There is a clear worry within the establishment that like Falk, some of the officials within the Human Rights Council are legal experts that recognize war crimes and illegitimate attacks when they see them and are actually attempting to do something about it.
This is one instance where some are attempting to work within and through the establishment left arm of the global elite system to meter out some justice.
In a 2008 interview, Japanese member of Parliament Yukihisa Fujita told the Alex Jones Show that there are numerous individuals within the UN structure that are significantly interested in pursuing the coordination of a new 9/11 investigation in order to address unanswered questions.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad)
However, it remains to be seen whether the Human Rights Council is composed of enough well meaning individuals to have a significant impact, or whether, like much of the rest of the UN, it will merely become a powerless part of the overall establishment control mechanism.
Scribd.com Articles
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47455809/The-Glory-of-Africa-Part-3
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47454460/The-USS-Liberty
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47040714/Howard-Thurman
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46699297/C-S-Lewis-Narnia-Etc
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46166206/Left-Gatekeepers-Part-3
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46165837/Stories-and-Lessons-Part-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45900158/Christmas-2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45711555/DARPA-and-Technology-Part-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45711428/Education
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45285096/Scientology-Exposed-Part-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44828551/Economic-Trade
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44358521/The-New-Gilded-Age
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47454460/The-USS-Liberty
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47040714/Howard-Thurman
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46699297/C-S-Lewis-Narnia-Etc
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46166206/Left-Gatekeepers-Part-3
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46165837/Stories-and-Lessons-Part-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45900158/Christmas-2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45711555/DARPA-and-Technology-Part-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45711428/Education
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45285096/Scientology-Exposed-Part-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44828551/Economic-Trade
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44358521/The-New-Gilded-Age
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Life News
American Idol hopeful Paris Tassin tells of unplanned pregnancy and birth of disabled daughter
Isolated incident? Another abortionist has license yanked !
African American abortion patient says Kermit Gosnell left her disabled
Belgian eugenics doctors harvesting “high quality” organs from patients who have been euthanized
Al Sharpton And Rick Santorum debate the issue of abortion and black genocide
African American activist calls abortion “WRONG”
African American women regrets her abortion
President Barack Obama's 2011 State of Union Speech
President Barack Obama gave his 2011 State of the Union Address yesterday. He shook Congresspeople's hands and Supreme Court Justices' hands as well. He expressed agreement of debate being essential to enrich our American culture. Yet, in his mind, the events in Tuscon proved that we are apart of the American family (despite differences of our different political beliefs). In other words, you don't have to agree with me, but that doesn't mean a person is less of a person. The President desired solutions of cooperation among both major parties in order to have effective governing. Now, legislation can't be passed without Republican and Democratic collaborations. The President wanted investments in technology and other services to develop economic progress. He said that the economic is growing again after the bad economic recession. President Barack Obama made known of the new economic reality in the era of globalization (or international competition where the rules have changed in this technological revolution). He wants America to not be stationary in the changing wins of change in history in order to meet the demands of a new age. President Barack Obama wants to encourage innovation, especially that deals with research. In other words, the President desires investments in information technology, clean coal technology, renewed energy, etc. He wants supercomputers and other innovation to have 1 million electrical cars by 2015. He set a goal of 2035 of 80 percent of all our homes to be used by alternative energy resources. President Barack Obama wished that No Child Left Behind to be replaced with a law that's flexible to work with local communities plus school boards. A comprehensive immigration solution is apart of the President's agenda (that deals with the border security and illegal immigration exist here in America now). The President wants to build up our infrastructure from high speed rail and high speed Internet. So, he wants to redouble those efforts in order to rebuild our construction centers, attract private investments, etc. (since China has huge transportation systems now). The President wants to possibly reform the new health care law in the 1090 provision, but he refuse to allow private insurance companies to deny a patient with a pre-existing condition. He wants cuts in community action programs and the military in his mind to handle the deficit and debt. He considered dealing with malpractice lawsuits. He doesn't believe in the privatization of all of Social Security. He rejects the notion of permanent tax cuts for the richest people in America. President Barack Obama wishes to simplify the tax code. The President didn't mention one word on the poor, which is interesting. President Barack Obama wants this time to be a Sputnik moment to revive our spirit of ingenuity and innovation. The President's State of the Union address was a decent, eloquent display of his agenda. Some parts of his speech are some items that I don't agree with. I don't agree with the President calling for the continuation of the war on terror, a spending freeze, and corporate tax rate cuts. President Barack Obama didn't say a word or syllable on foreclosures, hunger, poverty, food stamps, fighting outsourcing our jobs overseas, and solutions to help the most poor in America. The GOP and the Tea Party's responses to it (via Ryan and Bachmann) were either little plans or the same old laissez faire, supply side economics that got us in the mess we have now (this mess commenced before Barack Obama was ever elected President. We had 2 wars, tax cuts for the rich, and a high deficit before 2008). 14,000 laws were passed to open loopholes in the TAX code for the RICH and Corporations over the last 30 years has destroyed our DEBT, DEFICIT, Middle Class, Trade Balance, and OUR ECONOMY. What was interesting was that Ryan said that he believes in a social safety net, which is taboo for his Tea Party ilk to promote. Ryan wants to cut government revenues and raise taxes on 90 percent of Americans. Ryan has declared that the 2009 stimulus package to be a failure. This does not appear to comport to factual reality. The stimulus have made some economic improvements, but not in a radical sense. You can't say I want no spending and rich tax cuts then expect radical economic growth in America to develop. It doesn't work in that fashion.
Ronald Reagan's centennial after his birth is soon coming. A lot of Tea Party people and Republicans praise him. They view as some conservative deity, yet even Ronald Reagan wasn't as conservative as his proponents conceive him as well. I don't agree with Nimmo that any government intervention is some worship of the state. The government is made up of the people and the government doing legitimate deals is not a sin nor evil. Reagan was a different era for America. In his time, the debt and the poverty rate increased in America. Granted, he did sign a tax cut in 1981, but this went to a wealthy minority, not the majority that had their wealth decimated by the banksters and the Federal Reserve. Early in Reagan's term, Social Security taxes increased and inflation pushed millions into higher tax brackets. The federal deficit increased from 2.7 percent of GDP in 1980 to 6 percent of GDP in 1983. This was the largest peacetime deficit in history and was still 5 percent of GDP in 1986. Reagan closed “loopholes” (like tax shelters, the promotion of the alternative minimum tax, etc.) and increased government revenue from $517 billion in 1981 to $1.031 trillion in 1989. Reagan appointed Alan Greenspan as the FED Chairman. The FED has been involved in causing the recession in the early 1980's. The cut in the money supply by the FED existed as early as 1979. This manipulation of the money supply by the FED caused debt placed on the American people (and it's owed to the bankers for money loaned out of thin air to the government Reagan represented). “As governor of California and president of the United States, he enacted policies that, in the main, greatly expanded the role and size of government,” writes Anthony Gregory. “As governor, he oversaw the largest tax increase in Californian history. Democratic Governor Jerry Brown cut back the tax rate when he came to office.” Reagan wasn't a libertarian. He was a puppet politican. After his near death, Ronald Reagan was promoted as the poster child of a conservative even when he wasn't totally a conservative. Reagan's allies (the following is what Kurt Nimmo didn't show) supported the reactionary Mont Pelerin Society of Von Hayek, Friedman, and others. The elite fund these movement in order to further cause the disparity of the rich and the poor. Reagan when he was governor of California sucked up to the oil companies. He took up a balanced budget from Jerry Brown into a huge debt. Once before Reagan's time as Governor, Ronald Reagan is known for busting unions and promoting deregulation that Nimmo slyly omitted. Ronald Reagan has that conservative Christian tag by the establishment media. Yet, he was a follower of the occultic Bohemian Grove, he joined with his wife in astrology, and he was a honorary 33rd Degree Freemason. Iran Contra was under Reagan's watch as well. Like Palin, Bush and Schwarzenegger, all these huge Republicans are created by George H. W. Bush (or the CNP/Right Paradigm crew) as superstars. When they are nothing more than Haliburton/Bush/BP and war industry puppets. So, you have to have balance in economics. The globalists want little balance or regulation with total business exploitation of the common people. Our wages under Reagan are half of what they are now because now 2 people have to work to pay for a house, and the savings rates have also crumbled and credit card debt stacked. There is a direct relationship between prosperity and things like; public investments in technology and infrastructure, public support for commodity prices, tariff rates, etc. If you want to redistribute wealth, either up or down, you’ve got to create it first.
Jesse Ventura wants a lawsuit against the TSA because of his airport experience. Jesse was the former Minnesota Governor. He was subjected to TSA harassment. Now, he's suing the federal agency. Some want the TSA replaced with private security. The TSA has experience the situation of them responding to a FOIA request filed by former Congressman Bob Barr that could send further shockwaves via the Homeland Security controlled federal body. Ventura's lawsuit directly names DHS chief Janet Napolitano and the TSA head John Pistole against the new invasive groping measures introduced last year has provoked a tidal wave of media coverage. The TSA has become embroiled in a number of lawsuits and legal challenges over the past few months as the agency's policies are flagrantly abused by TSA staffers in numerous blatant examples of sexual harassment, violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and wanton disregard for the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. There is the case of the 24 year old woman named Lynsie Murley. She was from Amarillo, Texas. She received compensation from the agency after TSA workers pulled down her blouse and exposed her breasts. The TSA workers laughed in her face, leaving Murley, "extremely embarrassed and humiliated” according to the lawsuit. Ventura has his television series that is in risk of being cut and he's exposing the TSA. He's refusing to fly until the TSA policies change. This can stir another national debate about the TSA policies (that occurred back in November of 2010). Some had a national opt out day protest on Thanksgiving. This revolt was led by the Drudge Report website that flexed its power to make sure that this issue was shown in the public. The TSA reversed its procedures for travelers temporarily roped off naked body scanners and relaxed supposedly mandatory invasive pat down policies. The former Congressman Bob Barr's Liberty Guard organization filed a Freedom of Information Act to request demanding an explanation as to why the TSA felt comfortable in briefly mothballing policies it claimed were vital for national security simply as a propaganda ploy. The TSA wanted to pull out its legal trickes to be reticent in addressing the FOIA request. The Liberty Guard;s Shane Cory wants the FOIA request to exist. Any admission that the TSA amended its policies as part of a coordinated media stunt will send shock waves through an agency already on the ropes.
Rick Santorum is having his controversy that deals with race, abortion, and other subjects. Before presenting whether I agree with Rick's comments, it's time to show the situation. Rick Santorum went on FOX News to say that "...Well if that human life is not a person then I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say ‘now we are going to decide who are people and who are not people.." He was talking about President Barack Obama back in 2008 saying that knowing when human life begins was above his pay grade. Many liberals believe that his comments were condescending and racist, while conservatives praised his comments of course. The truth in some of these matters lies beyond the rhetoric of the Left/Right Paradigm. The Freemason Al Sharpton publicly debated Santorum on his comments. One good thing out of the debate was that both men wanted common ground solutions to try to decrease abortions in the black community. Rick is right and wrong on some issues. He's right that it's a scientific fact that human life begins in conception. This isn't my opinion. This is stuff documented by doctors, books, research, and genetic evidence (when conception occur, new genetics and new DNA exists among the unborn human being signifying new human life period). He's right that record abortions in the black communities and other communities is a tradegy and solutions should be made to deal with this issue. He's right that Margaret Sanger was an enemy of black Americans, she promoted eugenics, she hated charity & real anti-poverty measures, and used the Negro Project (not as a means to sincerely promote birth control, but to to decrease especially poorer communities of blacks, Slavs, other Eastern Europeans, and others she deemed "undesirable" or human weeds) against people. These are facts. Now, Rick is wrong to equate the suffering of black people as 100% equivalent to abortion. Abortion and slavery are similar in coming from the same tree of selfishness, bigotry, and destruction. Yet, these 2 actions have strong differences. Rick is also wrong to assume that blacks must be Pro-Life by force. Blacks should be pro-life or not voluntarily as a result of rational thinking. Black people have a lot of intellectual maturity to make up their own minds in deciding a position on this serious moral issue. Blacks have a great sense of moral character. Also, blacks shouldn't be a bunch of Republicans or conservatives (on every single issue) to prove that we are Pro-Life. Many African Americans from across the political spectrum are Pro-Life (like non-blacks are pro-life from many political persuasions too). Many Pro-Life people support his comments since they feel that it's hypocritical for some to claim person hood of blacks while denying the person hood of the unborn. That's an interesting point. Rick Santorum is a Knight of Malta, so that's an interesting tidbit to be shown. You notice that Santorum won't call for health care reform, radical anti-poverty measures, real sexual education, and other solutions that can radically reduce the abortion rate in communities. I do agree with Rick Santorum being opposed to abortion on demand. It's silly to assume that Rick had racist intent behind his commentary, but public and private solutions ought to be made to fight against abortion on demand. After Santorum’s initial remarks, which came in an videotaped interview last week with CNS News, he told David Brody of CBN News that he meant what he said, sending the statement: “For decades certain human beings were wrongly treated as property and denied liberty in America because they were not considered persons under the constitution. Today other human beings, the unborn of all races, are also wrongly treated as property and denied the right to life for the same reason; because they are not considered persons under the constitution. I am disappointed that President Obama, who rightfully fights for civil rights, refuses to recognize the civil rights of the unborn in this country.” His words on this point are quite accurate. To assume that the unborn has no value, no life, and no purpose is one of the biggest lies around. Many Republicans legitimately expose high levels of abortions as an serious complication in West, but they advance reactionary policies that do little to nothing to solve this problem (except for crisis pregnancy centers, which I have no problem with). Many Republicans (being brainwashed by the globalist promoted Austrian School rhetoric. Their ilk want to demonize government so much that they want an international banking cartel to run our government & have evil austerity measures) abhor Head Start, Upward Bound (to give low income children to have the same opportunity to further their education after high school), and other programs to help human beings that live outside of the womb. The Southern strategy doesn't work anymore. I want mention this too. The extreme of the Left Gatekeepers can never use my own people as some underclass to promote radical abortion on demand too (abortion on demand has never been apart of African culture at all. Abortion and population control has been supported, promoted, and funded by the elite like the Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, even the religious establishment, etc.). Also, the left gatekeepers legitimately expose gun violence as a serious problem in urban and suburban areas (and desiring reforms in mental health, etc.). Yet, some of them want to heavily restrict the gun rights of law abiding citizens. There is nothing wrong with preventing criminals or having safeguards to not allow others (after due process) to not own a gun. Yet, it's wrong to arbitrarily have innocent citizens to be treated as equivalent as a Jared Loughner type of person. The good cop Democrats and the bad cop Republican only cause the system to divide, confuse, and conquer the deluded masses in general (as opposed to those awakened from the Matrix of control). The elite of both major parties don't care about blacks or anyone else really. We shouldn't suck up to the Republicans or the Democrats. They only want control. They use issues like abortion as a means to control the masses and make them to be in the Left/Right Paradigm, while radically independent solutions are shunned by the establishment. Roe didn't solve our problems in a real way. Sometimes, Roe made problems worse. We don't need to be managed by proxy. We need to be our own leaders. Instead of looking Right or Left for our purpose, we need to look straight ahead or forward. Keeping going forward is great advice instead of worshipping some political philosophy.
It's not a secret that the establishment is targeting our jobs. According to CNN, home values in America tumbled another 1.7 trillion dollars in 2010. America lost 32% of its manufacturing jobs since the year of 200. Manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer industry is lower in 2010 than it was in 1975. The middle class and the poor have been assaulted on many fronts. The elite want a techno feudal future with the elite ruling over the middle and poor class of workers. Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has just returned to Iraq after 3 years of self imposed exile in Iran (back in November 2010). The Shiites might have more power in Iraq after American forces left. al-Sadr is pro-Iranian and has issues with American policies. There is existence of higher education worldwide. The Illuminati of course devised their student societies at Universities. 2 in Germany are called the Tugenbund and Berschenschaften. William H. Russell matriculated and studied in these institutions in Germany. He returned back into America to form Yale's Skulls and Bones secret Society (with student societies' ceremonies and rites from Germany). S&B acknowledges today that it came “from the German chapter,” which presented as a gift to S&B a painting that seems to depict the rites of the Regent degree of the Illuminati. Laurence Sterne's "The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentelment" was recommended reading for Illuminati initiates. One of the most important characters in the book was "Uncle Toby." "Uncle Toby" is one name used during Skulls and Bones initiations. Just like the Illuminati back then, the Skulls and Bones focused on preparing the elite among what they call "the most ingenious men." Clarence Karier wrote the book in 1986 called "The Individual, Society, and Education: A History of American Educational Ideas." He wrote that the Illuminist Pestalozzi “argued for a practical education for the new proletariat and was looked upon with favor by the power elite for suggesting that ‘the poor must be educated for poverty’ for in order ‘to enjoy the best possible state, both of soul and body… it is necessary to desire and be content with still less’.” This is very similar to the view of Frederick Gates, the head of Rockefeller’s General Education Board founded in 1902. Gates in Occasional Letter, No. 1 revealed that “In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk.” In other words, Gates and Pestalozzi wants the educational system to produce docile citizens that lack independent thinking to go against the evil agendas of the elite. Many schools followed Weishaupt's views. German historian Reinhart Koselleck put Weishaupt “in a row with [Comte Henri de] Saint-Simon and [Karl] Marx” from 1818 to 1824, Saint Simon’s secretary was August Comte, who from 1851 to 1857 wrote a 4-volume set titled System of Positive Polity explaining his “Positive Philosophy” in which collective humanity became more important than the individual, and it replaced God as the focus of worship. Some view the positivist philosophy as the origin of the secular Humanist movement. John Dewey was a famous secular humanist. He's the father of progressive education. He was the signer of the first Humanist Manifesto back in 1933, which showed that values are autonomous and situational. Charles Francis Potter was another signer. His book called "Humanism: A New Religion" form 1930 wrote that: "...Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a 5-day program of humanistic teaching?” Also, Brock Chisholm in the February 1946 edition of Psychiatry advocated world government and children to be world citizens. He was the head of the World Health Organization. Brock wrote that: "...We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests…. The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives… for charting the changes in human behavior.” Adam Weishaupt rejected private property rights, moral absolutes, and other mainstream concepts. Even his second in command of the Illuminati Baron von Knigge wanted to witness "world citizens." 24 years after Chisholm's article was published, something occurred. The leading educator Ted Sizer in his "Five Lectueres...On Moral Education" form 1970 wrote that: "...Moral autonomy… is the ‘new morality’ toward which we are to guide ourselves and other people.” Then in the September/October 1981 edition of The Humanist, H.J. Blackham (a founder of the 4-million member International Humanist and Ethical Union) wrote that if schools teach dependence (moral, etc.) on oneself, “they are more revolutionary than any conspiracy to overthrow the government.” His words are accurate then and now.
By Timothy
Ronald Reagan's centennial after his birth is soon coming. A lot of Tea Party people and Republicans praise him. They view as some conservative deity, yet even Ronald Reagan wasn't as conservative as his proponents conceive him as well. I don't agree with Nimmo that any government intervention is some worship of the state. The government is made up of the people and the government doing legitimate deals is not a sin nor evil. Reagan was a different era for America. In his time, the debt and the poverty rate increased in America. Granted, he did sign a tax cut in 1981, but this went to a wealthy minority, not the majority that had their wealth decimated by the banksters and the Federal Reserve. Early in Reagan's term, Social Security taxes increased and inflation pushed millions into higher tax brackets. The federal deficit increased from 2.7 percent of GDP in 1980 to 6 percent of GDP in 1983. This was the largest peacetime deficit in history and was still 5 percent of GDP in 1986. Reagan closed “loopholes” (like tax shelters, the promotion of the alternative minimum tax, etc.) and increased government revenue from $517 billion in 1981 to $1.031 trillion in 1989. Reagan appointed Alan Greenspan as the FED Chairman. The FED has been involved in causing the recession in the early 1980's. The cut in the money supply by the FED existed as early as 1979. This manipulation of the money supply by the FED caused debt placed on the American people (and it's owed to the bankers for money loaned out of thin air to the government Reagan represented). “As governor of California and president of the United States, he enacted policies that, in the main, greatly expanded the role and size of government,” writes Anthony Gregory. “As governor, he oversaw the largest tax increase in Californian history. Democratic Governor Jerry Brown cut back the tax rate when he came to office.” Reagan wasn't a libertarian. He was a puppet politican. After his near death, Ronald Reagan was promoted as the poster child of a conservative even when he wasn't totally a conservative. Reagan's allies (the following is what Kurt Nimmo didn't show) supported the reactionary Mont Pelerin Society of Von Hayek, Friedman, and others. The elite fund these movement in order to further cause the disparity of the rich and the poor. Reagan when he was governor of California sucked up to the oil companies. He took up a balanced budget from Jerry Brown into a huge debt. Once before Reagan's time as Governor, Ronald Reagan is known for busting unions and promoting deregulation that Nimmo slyly omitted. Ronald Reagan has that conservative Christian tag by the establishment media. Yet, he was a follower of the occultic Bohemian Grove, he joined with his wife in astrology, and he was a honorary 33rd Degree Freemason. Iran Contra was under Reagan's watch as well. Like Palin, Bush and Schwarzenegger, all these huge Republicans are created by George H. W. Bush (or the CNP/Right Paradigm crew) as superstars. When they are nothing more than Haliburton/Bush/BP and war industry puppets. So, you have to have balance in economics. The globalists want little balance or regulation with total business exploitation of the common people. Our wages under Reagan are half of what they are now because now 2 people have to work to pay for a house, and the savings rates have also crumbled and credit card debt stacked. There is a direct relationship between prosperity and things like; public investments in technology and infrastructure, public support for commodity prices, tariff rates, etc. If you want to redistribute wealth, either up or down, you’ve got to create it first.
Jesse Ventura wants a lawsuit against the TSA because of his airport experience. Jesse was the former Minnesota Governor. He was subjected to TSA harassment. Now, he's suing the federal agency. Some want the TSA replaced with private security. The TSA has experience the situation of them responding to a FOIA request filed by former Congressman Bob Barr that could send further shockwaves via the Homeland Security controlled federal body. Ventura's lawsuit directly names DHS chief Janet Napolitano and the TSA head John Pistole against the new invasive groping measures introduced last year has provoked a tidal wave of media coverage. The TSA has become embroiled in a number of lawsuits and legal challenges over the past few months as the agency's policies are flagrantly abused by TSA staffers in numerous blatant examples of sexual harassment, violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and wanton disregard for the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. There is the case of the 24 year old woman named Lynsie Murley. She was from Amarillo, Texas. She received compensation from the agency after TSA workers pulled down her blouse and exposed her breasts. The TSA workers laughed in her face, leaving Murley, "extremely embarrassed and humiliated” according to the lawsuit. Ventura has his television series that is in risk of being cut and he's exposing the TSA. He's refusing to fly until the TSA policies change. This can stir another national debate about the TSA policies (that occurred back in November of 2010). Some had a national opt out day protest on Thanksgiving. This revolt was led by the Drudge Report website that flexed its power to make sure that this issue was shown in the public. The TSA reversed its procedures for travelers temporarily roped off naked body scanners and relaxed supposedly mandatory invasive pat down policies. The former Congressman Bob Barr's Liberty Guard organization filed a Freedom of Information Act to request demanding an explanation as to why the TSA felt comfortable in briefly mothballing policies it claimed were vital for national security simply as a propaganda ploy. The TSA wanted to pull out its legal trickes to be reticent in addressing the FOIA request. The Liberty Guard;s Shane Cory wants the FOIA request to exist. Any admission that the TSA amended its policies as part of a coordinated media stunt will send shock waves through an agency already on the ropes.
Rick Santorum is having his controversy that deals with race, abortion, and other subjects. Before presenting whether I agree with Rick's comments, it's time to show the situation. Rick Santorum went on FOX News to say that "...Well if that human life is not a person then I find it almost remarkable for a black man to say ‘now we are going to decide who are people and who are not people.." He was talking about President Barack Obama back in 2008 saying that knowing when human life begins was above his pay grade. Many liberals believe that his comments were condescending and racist, while conservatives praised his comments of course. The truth in some of these matters lies beyond the rhetoric of the Left/Right Paradigm. The Freemason Al Sharpton publicly debated Santorum on his comments. One good thing out of the debate was that both men wanted common ground solutions to try to decrease abortions in the black community. Rick is right and wrong on some issues. He's right that it's a scientific fact that human life begins in conception. This isn't my opinion. This is stuff documented by doctors, books, research, and genetic evidence (when conception occur, new genetics and new DNA exists among the unborn human being signifying new human life period). He's right that record abortions in the black communities and other communities is a tradegy and solutions should be made to deal with this issue. He's right that Margaret Sanger was an enemy of black Americans, she promoted eugenics, she hated charity & real anti-poverty measures, and used the Negro Project (not as a means to sincerely promote birth control, but to to decrease especially poorer communities of blacks, Slavs, other Eastern Europeans, and others she deemed "undesirable" or human weeds) against people. These are facts. Now, Rick is wrong to equate the suffering of black people as 100% equivalent to abortion. Abortion and slavery are similar in coming from the same tree of selfishness, bigotry, and destruction. Yet, these 2 actions have strong differences. Rick is also wrong to assume that blacks must be Pro-Life by force. Blacks should be pro-life or not voluntarily as a result of rational thinking. Black people have a lot of intellectual maturity to make up their own minds in deciding a position on this serious moral issue. Blacks have a great sense of moral character. Also, blacks shouldn't be a bunch of Republicans or conservatives (on every single issue) to prove that we are Pro-Life. Many African Americans from across the political spectrum are Pro-Life (like non-blacks are pro-life from many political persuasions too). Many Pro-Life people support his comments since they feel that it's hypocritical for some to claim person hood of blacks while denying the person hood of the unborn. That's an interesting point. Rick Santorum is a Knight of Malta, so that's an interesting tidbit to be shown. You notice that Santorum won't call for health care reform, radical anti-poverty measures, real sexual education, and other solutions that can radically reduce the abortion rate in communities. I do agree with Rick Santorum being opposed to abortion on demand. It's silly to assume that Rick had racist intent behind his commentary, but public and private solutions ought to be made to fight against abortion on demand. After Santorum’s initial remarks, which came in an videotaped interview last week with CNS News, he told David Brody of CBN News that he meant what he said, sending the statement: “For decades certain human beings were wrongly treated as property and denied liberty in America because they were not considered persons under the constitution. Today other human beings, the unborn of all races, are also wrongly treated as property and denied the right to life for the same reason; because they are not considered persons under the constitution. I am disappointed that President Obama, who rightfully fights for civil rights, refuses to recognize the civil rights of the unborn in this country.” His words on this point are quite accurate. To assume that the unborn has no value, no life, and no purpose is one of the biggest lies around. Many Republicans legitimately expose high levels of abortions as an serious complication in West, but they advance reactionary policies that do little to nothing to solve this problem (except for crisis pregnancy centers, which I have no problem with). Many Republicans (being brainwashed by the globalist promoted Austrian School rhetoric. Their ilk want to demonize government so much that they want an international banking cartel to run our government & have evil austerity measures) abhor Head Start, Upward Bound (to give low income children to have the same opportunity to further their education after high school), and other programs to help human beings that live outside of the womb. The Southern strategy doesn't work anymore. I want mention this too. The extreme of the Left Gatekeepers can never use my own people as some underclass to promote radical abortion on demand too (abortion on demand has never been apart of African culture at all. Abortion and population control has been supported, promoted, and funded by the elite like the Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, even the religious establishment, etc.). Also, the left gatekeepers legitimately expose gun violence as a serious problem in urban and suburban areas (and desiring reforms in mental health, etc.). Yet, some of them want to heavily restrict the gun rights of law abiding citizens. There is nothing wrong with preventing criminals or having safeguards to not allow others (after due process) to not own a gun. Yet, it's wrong to arbitrarily have innocent citizens to be treated as equivalent as a Jared Loughner type of person. The good cop Democrats and the bad cop Republican only cause the system to divide, confuse, and conquer the deluded masses in general (as opposed to those awakened from the Matrix of control). The elite of both major parties don't care about blacks or anyone else really. We shouldn't suck up to the Republicans or the Democrats. They only want control. They use issues like abortion as a means to control the masses and make them to be in the Left/Right Paradigm, while radically independent solutions are shunned by the establishment. Roe didn't solve our problems in a real way. Sometimes, Roe made problems worse. We don't need to be managed by proxy. We need to be our own leaders. Instead of looking Right or Left for our purpose, we need to look straight ahead or forward. Keeping going forward is great advice instead of worshipping some political philosophy.
It's not a secret that the establishment is targeting our jobs. According to CNN, home values in America tumbled another 1.7 trillion dollars in 2010. America lost 32% of its manufacturing jobs since the year of 200. Manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer industry is lower in 2010 than it was in 1975. The middle class and the poor have been assaulted on many fronts. The elite want a techno feudal future with the elite ruling over the middle and poor class of workers. Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has just returned to Iraq after 3 years of self imposed exile in Iran (back in November 2010). The Shiites might have more power in Iraq after American forces left. al-Sadr is pro-Iranian and has issues with American policies. There is existence of higher education worldwide. The Illuminati of course devised their student societies at Universities. 2 in Germany are called the Tugenbund and Berschenschaften. William H. Russell matriculated and studied in these institutions in Germany. He returned back into America to form Yale's Skulls and Bones secret Society (with student societies' ceremonies and rites from Germany). S&B acknowledges today that it came “from the German chapter,” which presented as a gift to S&B a painting that seems to depict the rites of the Regent degree of the Illuminati. Laurence Sterne's "The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentelment" was recommended reading for Illuminati initiates. One of the most important characters in the book was "Uncle Toby." "Uncle Toby" is one name used during Skulls and Bones initiations. Just like the Illuminati back then, the Skulls and Bones focused on preparing the elite among what they call "the most ingenious men." Clarence Karier wrote the book in 1986 called "The Individual, Society, and Education: A History of American Educational Ideas." He wrote that the Illuminist Pestalozzi “argued for a practical education for the new proletariat and was looked upon with favor by the power elite for suggesting that ‘the poor must be educated for poverty’ for in order ‘to enjoy the best possible state, both of soul and body… it is necessary to desire and be content with still less’.” This is very similar to the view of Frederick Gates, the head of Rockefeller’s General Education Board founded in 1902. Gates in Occasional Letter, No. 1 revealed that “In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk.” In other words, Gates and Pestalozzi wants the educational system to produce docile citizens that lack independent thinking to go against the evil agendas of the elite. Many schools followed Weishaupt's views. German historian Reinhart Koselleck put Weishaupt “in a row with [Comte Henri de] Saint-Simon and [Karl] Marx” from 1818 to 1824, Saint Simon’s secretary was August Comte, who from 1851 to 1857 wrote a 4-volume set titled System of Positive Polity explaining his “Positive Philosophy” in which collective humanity became more important than the individual, and it replaced God as the focus of worship. Some view the positivist philosophy as the origin of the secular Humanist movement. John Dewey was a famous secular humanist. He's the father of progressive education. He was the signer of the first Humanist Manifesto back in 1933, which showed that values are autonomous and situational. Charles Francis Potter was another signer. His book called "Humanism: A New Religion" form 1930 wrote that: "...Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a 5-day program of humanistic teaching?” Also, Brock Chisholm in the February 1946 edition of Psychiatry advocated world government and children to be world citizens. He was the head of the World Health Organization. Brock wrote that: "...We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests…. The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives… for charting the changes in human behavior.” Adam Weishaupt rejected private property rights, moral absolutes, and other mainstream concepts. Even his second in command of the Illuminati Baron von Knigge wanted to witness "world citizens." 24 years after Chisholm's article was published, something occurred. The leading educator Ted Sizer in his "Five Lectueres...On Moral Education" form 1970 wrote that: "...Moral autonomy… is the ‘new morality’ toward which we are to guide ourselves and other people.” Then in the September/October 1981 edition of The Humanist, H.J. Blackham (a founder of the 4-million member International Humanist and Ethical Union) wrote that if schools teach dependence (moral, etc.) on oneself, “they are more revolutionary than any conspiracy to overthrow the government.” His words are accurate then and now.
By Timothy