Pro-God, Pro-Human Life, anti-New World Order, Anti-Nefarious Secret Societies, Pro-Civil Liberties, anti-Torture, anti-National ID Card, Pro-Family, Anti-Neo Conservativism, Pro-Net Neutrality, Pro-Home Schooling, Anti-Voting Fraud, Pro-Good Israelis & Pro-Good Palestinians, Anti-Human Trafficking, Pro-Health Freedom, Anti-Codex Alimentarius, Pro-Action, Anti-Bigotry, Pro-9/11 Justice, Anti-Genocide, and Pro-Gun Control. My name is Timothy and I'm from the state of Virginia.
Pages
▼
Friday, October 14, 2005
On the ACLU
I do oppose the ACLU for many reasons. First, I might cite a couple of things that I do agree with the ACLU. I do agree with them in the sense that they support some of our civil liberties like being against the Patriot Act, Bush’s policies toward our Bill of Rights, and their opposition to torture. It is important to preserve our civil liberties and be truly free, but liberty shouldn’t be a license for moral relativism, corruption, or sinfulness at all. I disagree with the ACLU’s attack on religious expression. Just because people communicate religious themes in the public square, doesn’t mean that expression is a violation of the establishment clause. I’m pro-Life and I abhor their anti-life policies. The ACLU was founded by Roger Baldwin, an extremist and he was quoted as being a socialist. Even today, the head of the ACLU is Anthony Romero, a homosexual and a CFR member. The CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, and other organizations with their ilk advocate a global government that we must dissent with.
As for abortion, the Pro-Choice side uses emotionalism and more emotionalism. Roe v. Wade is not even validated by any law, not to mention it’s a federal intrusion on the states to decide how abortion laws ought to exist. Plus, many states before 1973 had laws on the books dealing with abortion, so the state legislatures are apt to handle the situation. Roe v. Wade violates the Preamble of the Constitution saying that life is not deprived without due process of the law and the inherit right to life, which comes from our Creator. Science has proven the personhood of the unborn (not to mention that prominent scientists have outlined that life begins at conception) and more of young are being more Pro-Life than ever before. Bigotry of evil is holy. I’m a bigot against murder, corruption, racism, sin, evil, death, torture, etc. If I’m that kind of a bigot, then I’m guilty as charged. The ACLU is hypocritical by rightfully wanting certain civil liberties for Americans, but denying the civil liberties of the unborn, gun rights, and the rights of the disabled plus terminally ill. I wrote my comments also on this link.
Maybe you could feed, house, clothe and care for all of the children that would otherwise receive inadequate care born to poor, uneducated, socially immobile mothers. Pay attention to yourself, people can decide what is right and wrong in their lives without your intrusion, I promise.
dtinx: Maybe you could feed, house, clothe and care for all of the children that would otherwise receive inadequate care born to poor, uneducated, socially immobile mothers. Pay attention to yourself, people can decide what is right and wrong in their lives without your intrusion, I promise.
Response: dtinx, this is a typical response from the pro-death crowd. In your mind, killing people is justified for the so-called "material and economic stability of the world." This is the same lie used by racists and eugencists for centuries and you should of known better. The fact is how do you know that extra infants can't radically improve the world?
There is a possibility that babies saved can be a great President, a great leader, or another hero improving the conditions of mankind. The population growth worldwide is declining, America's population is stable, and other places have their populations decreasing like Japan and Russia, so to use "overpopulation" as an excuse for abortion doesn't hold water at all. As for poor conditions, being in a poor condition will never justify killing innocent unborn life. There is absolutely no justification at all to kill unborn innocent life period. There is still that chance that the baby can rise out of a poor condition, which has occured among many people for centuries. I pay attention to myself.
Sorry, people aren't perfect and the law forbids murder. Some people may decide murder, but the law forbids this. Also, this isn't about intrusion. The law clearly forbids murder and killing life without due process of law. Abortion violates these legal principles. It's indeed the federal government with the Roe V. Wade decision that's intruding on the states' right to handle the abortion affairs themselves.
There are absolutes and telling people to not do actions against moral absolutes or face the consequences is not only moral, but legal as well. America is one of the most resilient nation on Earth. If we get rid of bad leadership in this country, I'm sure that new programs can adequately assist the poor. Plus, you left out the option of adoption that is really doing great. Mothers can easy have other options to handle an unwanted pregancy instead of killing the unborn baby.
It's typical of you since your following in the footstep of anti-charity, pro-eugenics Margaret Sanger who not only wanted abortion, but the segregation of the poor and the handicapped. Some people can't decide what is right and wrong, that's why we have laws to prevent mob-rule. The government is limited, but moral principles against rape, murder, etc. are perserved, so choas won't reign. We're a republic, not a democracy allowing the majority of the people deciding our fate at every circumstance. I hope you wake up. I trust people, but not evil.
Maybe you could feed, house, clothe and care for all of the children that would otherwise receive inadequate care born to poor, uneducated, socially immobile mothers. Pay attention to yourself, people can decide what is right and wrong in their lives without your intrusion, I promise.
ReplyDeletedtinx: Maybe you could feed, house, clothe and care for all of the children that would otherwise receive inadequate care born to poor, uneducated, socially immobile mothers. Pay attention to yourself, people can decide what is right and wrong in their lives without your intrusion, I promise.
ReplyDeleteResponse: dtinx, this is a typical response from the pro-death crowd. In your mind, killing people is justified for the so-called "material and economic stability of the world." This is the same lie used by racists and eugencists for centuries and you should of known better. The fact is how do you know that extra infants can't radically improve the world?
There is a possibility that babies saved can be a great President, a great leader, or another hero improving the conditions of mankind. The population growth worldwide is declining, America's population is stable, and other places have their populations decreasing like Japan and Russia, so to use "overpopulation" as an excuse for abortion doesn't hold water at all. As for poor conditions, being in a poor condition will never justify killing innocent unborn life. There is absolutely no justification at all to kill unborn innocent life period. There is still that chance that the baby can rise out of a poor condition, which has occured among many people for centuries. I pay attention to myself.
Sorry, people aren't perfect and the law forbids murder. Some people may decide murder, but the law forbids this. Also, this isn't about intrusion. The law clearly forbids murder and killing life without due process of law. Abortion violates these legal principles. It's indeed the federal government with the Roe V. Wade decision that's intruding on the states' right to handle the abortion affairs themselves.
There are absolutes and telling people to not do actions against moral absolutes or face the consequences is not only moral, but legal as well. America is one of the most resilient nation on Earth. If we get rid of bad leadership in this country, I'm sure that new programs can adequately assist the poor. Plus, you left out the option of adoption that is really doing great. Mothers can easy have other options to handle an unwanted pregancy instead of killing the unborn baby.
It's typical of you since your following in the footstep of anti-charity, pro-eugenics Margaret Sanger who not only wanted abortion, but the segregation of the poor and the handicapped. Some people can't decide what is right and wrong, that's why we have laws to prevent mob-rule. The government is limited, but moral principles against rape, murder, etc. are perserved, so choas won't reign. We're a republic, not a democracy allowing the majority of the people deciding our fate at every circumstance. I hope you wake up. I trust people, but not evil.
Just passing through, cool blog by the way.
ReplyDelete