An insider speaks out about Iraq.

From http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11965317/site/newsweek/



Breaking the Silence
A prominent former insider is criticizing the administration’s handling of Iraq’s reconstruction. And there’s more to come.

Marwan Naamani / AFP-Getty Images
Bremer reviews Iraqi troops in 2003
View related photos

MICHAEL HIRSH
The World From Washington
• Natsios Criticizes Iraq ContractsA prominent former insider is criticizing the administration’s handling of Iraq’s reconstruction. And there’s more to come.
• What’s Putin’s Game on the Mideast?
• Bush’s Poor Leadership in Terror War
getCSS("3222991")
PODCAST

• Listen to podcast: Politics—Bush's GOP Problem and Democratic Designs
• Download most recent podcast
var cssList = new Array();
getCSS("3235842")
Most Popular
• Most Viewed
• Top Rated
• Most E-mailed
• The Kid Stayed in the Picture
• Surgery: No Lift for Face-Lifts
• Toto, I Don’t Think We’re in Texas Anymore
• Freezing Point
• Poultry Pioneer
• Most viewed on MSNBC.com
• Breaking the Silence
• Swimming With Sharks
• Is Anyone Listening?
• GM's Game of Bumpercars
• Fear and Loathing in Siberia
• Most viewed on MSNBC.com
• The Kid Stayed in the Picture
• Blogging Beyond the Men's Club
• Surgery: No Lift for Face-Lifts
• Freud in Our Midst
• ‘Operation Incomprehensible Program’
• Most viewed on MSNBC.com
pop_pushTabBox('boxB_3235842');
getCSS("3235842")
EDITOR'S CHOICE
• China: Demoted Editor on Dark Media Climate
• Starr: When March Madness Got Personal
• Heralding the Chicken Nugget's Unsung Creator
• Hirsh: Natsios Criticizes Iraq Contracts
• The Oval: Is Bush's Iraq Media Blitz Helping?
var cssList = new Array();
getCSS("3235842")
BLOG TALK
Read what bloggers are saying about this Newsweek article
10 blogs are discussing Hirsh: Natsios Criticizes Iraq Contracts right now. View All »

var cssList = new Array();
getCSS("3235842")
Related Stories
What's this?
• Hirsh: Iran's President Makes Bush Look Good
• Bush stumps in Idaho for Iraq strategy


Search the Site

WEB-EXCLUSIVE COMMENTARY
By Michael Hirsh
Newsweek
Updated: 7:40 p.m. ET March 22, 2006
March 22, 2006 - Andrew Natsios has taken a lot of flak over his role in Iraq. The longtime director of America's foreign-aid program has been pilloried for his April 2003 remark, in an ABC News interview, that the U.S. government would spend no more than $1.7 billion to rebuild Iraq. In the ensuing three years, Natsios, a lifelong Republican, has played the loyal soldier for the administration. He regularly defended the U.S. reconstruction effort in Iraq even as he was lumped with other errant prognosticators like Paul Wolfowitz (That's “wildly off the mark") and Dick Cheney ("We will be greeted as liberators"). After Natsios resigned in January to take a teaching post at Georgetown University, he maintained his silence about Iraq.
Story continues below ↓



But this week, for the first time, Natsios publicly gave vent to his long-suppressed frustrations over the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq occupation. In an interview with NEWSWEEK on Tuesday, he harshly criticized the Coalition Provisional Authority led by L. Paul Bremer III for botching the reconstruction effort and allowing ill-qualified or corrupt contractors to dominate it. "They didn't have [monitoring] systems set up. They were very dismissive of these processes," he said. His U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was marginalized despite its expertise, and the CPA "didn't hire the best people," he said. "We were just watching it unfold. They [the CPA] were constantly hitting at our people, screaming at them. They were abusive."
Natsios's low-cost estimate from April 2003, he made clear, was not based on the kind of chaotic, top-heavy occupation that he says Bremer eventually installed in Iraq but on the more traditional, streamlined U.S. aid effort that Natsios had urged.
Manuel Balce Ceneta / AP
Natsios: Says CPA didn’t hire the ‘best people’
Dan Senor, former spokesman for Bremer’s CPA, dismissed Natsios’s criticisms, saying the insurgency in Iraq made ordinary contracting procedures impossible. "I'm not familiar with the traditional USAID program that was recommended,” Senor told NEWSWEEK. “If it was traditional and conventional, it may have made sense for the reconstruction of Switzerland. But it sounds like it was completely irrelevant to the facts and conditions on the ground that we found in Iraq.” Senor added that the CPA had "recruited some of the top career Foreign Service officers from the State Department to serve in the CPA's management roles. We would have welcomed suggestions—from Andrew or anyone else—of who would have been better experienced.”
Natsios, who served as USAID director for nearly five years and was considered one of the top development and aid experts in Washington, says that his advice was largely ignored. Other administration officials, usually speaking anonymously, have backed Natsios's dim view of the CPA's competence level. The conventional wisdom today is that while most CPA officials were enthusiastic and brave, too many were inexperienced and second-rate.

CONTINUED