More of Eric Jon Phelps' words (I don't agree with Eric on many issues, so I want to make that clear).

From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=20755


Bro. Eric,

I highlighted in blue what I'm commenting on.

I believe that both the Third Hebrew Temple and Babylon will be built before the appearing of Christ for his Church. I have no scripture for this. What I do know to be the truth is that the appearing is any moment as nothing has to be fulfilled for that event. Thus I have adhered to the doctrine of the imminent return of Christ for his Body, while observing the stage being set for the 70th week of Daniel, which includes the rebuilding of the Temple and Babylon. And if my instincts be true, the Lord will appear for his Church about one day before the signing of the "covenant with many for one week."

His dispensation of grace will extend to the last day---just before the appointed time for the signing of the "covenant with death."If you believe that the Temple and Babylon will be built before the appearing of Christ for his Church, then you can't at the same time believe in the imminency of his coming.

Please re-read above sentences. I will restate for clarification. I believe that we may well see the rebuilding of the Hebrew Temple as well as the city of Babylon before the Lord appears. But I do not believe that the rebuliding of these places is necessary before the appearing of Christ for HIs Body. Thus his imminent appearing for us is set in stone. I trust this is clearer.

That's double talk. If you believe that Christ's appearing could happen at any time, then you'll saying that you're not really sure as to the time of the rebuilding of the Temple and Babylon. A lot of the hype about the soon-to-come NWO, the mark of the beast, the destruction of this country, etc., and very little mention of the appearing of the Lord, I feel is due to two reasons: (1) There is shallow belief in the imminency of Christ's appearing, and

Agreed. Most believers involved in this ministry are post trib, mid-trib or just amillennial. They make no distinction between Israel and the Church in violation of I Cor. 10:32.

(2) There is a problem with one's view on dispensationalism. If I believe that I'll be around when the covenant with death is signed and the mark of the beast is issued, then of course I'll be concerned and hyped up about these things coming upon us. But on the other hand, if I believe in his imminency and in his promise that "he has not appointed us unto wrath (pre-trib)," then I won't be concerned about the NWO, the antichrist or his issuing the biochips (as was Gianni Hayes last night). By the way, Leo Zagami, if I understood him correctly, does not believe in your invasions into the US that you frequently mention. He said that invasions will not be necessary. Correct me if I misunderstood him.

Agreed, God has not appointed us to wrath (the 70th week of Daniel). But we still have a responsibility to resist evil in every sphere of life beginning with our own flesh. As you know, biblical principles must be applied in every facet of life. When your government violates its contract with you and steals from you; when the Congress refuses to declare war as per Constitutional mandate (Article 1 Sec 8); when the executibe removes all gold and silver coins from circulation nulifying the power of Congress to coin money in violation of the same section, etc., then we must confront these men in their lawlessness. If we do not, our silence is consent to their crimes perpetrated against us as well as against the nations these men attack and destroy.I suggest the reading of Presbyterian Calvinist Timothy Dwight, the first president of Harvard and one of General Washington's strongest preachers and advisors.

Bro. Carl

Brother Eric


_________________________

From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=20946

Dear Brother Larry,

Well Done! I will continue to expose Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Alex Jones. His mission is to instill fear in the masses with the intent of driving the White Middle Class (Catholics and apostatel Protestants) into right-wing fascism. He is succeeding. His filmed staged events with David Gergen, Governor George Bush and Michael Moore confirm this conclusion.

Sincerely in Faith,

Brother Eric

Hi Eric,

A few weeks ago I was talking to a couple of New Agers that told me that Alex Jones is a member of a secret society in the government. A friend of mine and I were at a 911 conference last June, we were exposing the Jesuits and the Catholic Church with the help of Jesus, Alex was there. We were two door from his room, he told my friend in the lobby that I seen you somewhere before, he came up to the rooms and he told me I seen you somewhere before, he made this statement when my friend & I were separate. Th e next day around 2pm we were carring our board with picture and texts ( 60 x 50 board )exposing the Jesuits & Catholic Church, Alex Jones was in a chair reading a book on 911, I was passing him by when he saw the illustrations He says I need to get a picture of that when I turned the board for him to see what was really on there his head dropped down to the floor and he was dismayed. He said I'm being condemned on the internet by Eric Phelps because I'm not exposing the Jesuits. He went on to say he calls me a coadjutor (he couldn't think of the word right away). He says I need to study it out about the Jesuits. My friend told him that he need to be born again. As the meeting went on he avoided us. I believe that he is a coadjutor, he was working up the people into a frienzy against the government. He is working for Rome I believe. May God help us to be faithfull and true in these last days. Please keep sending the info you are sending us. Thank you for the info.

Larry


_______________

ERIC PHELPSCLOAK & DAGGER20 FEB 2006"Suspend your judgment and remember what Phelps says then all history's dots will come together."

MP3 FORMAT 7 MEG


______________________


http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=20886


Note by Me: I don't agree with Eric's views on race, but I agree with him on the evil of the Jesuits

By Timothy

________________________________


Hi Brother Eric.

One thing that's really frustrating to me is pre-trib vs. post-trib rapture. I lean towards post-trib (see Matthew 24).

Matthew 24 has nothing to do with the Church, the Body of Christ. Christ was talking to his Jewish disciples anticipating the establishment of the Davidic Kingdom as offered by Christ for over three years. The Church was not in existence at the time of Matthew 24; it began in Acts 2 after the Lord's ascension into heaven, he being seated at the right hand of His Father. (Ps.110:1). The Jews in the Great Tribulation look for signs indicating the soon return of their Messiah; the Church at this moment does not look for signs but anticipates the Lord's momentary appearance---this is our Blessed Hope unique to the Lord's Church. (Titus 2:13)

But I'm still pretty much on the fence. I don't believe one can lose one's salvation for the record...

Good.

I believe that if a Christian goes astray God deals with that person like a father correcting his son.

Amen. Hebrews 12.

The frustrating part is seeing both "sides" go at it and point fingers and call each other heretics. They both have convincing arguments...but I'm not interested in who's more convincing, I'm interested in what's the truth. I'm really hoping you can help me out here.

If the Church, the Body of Christ did not exist in the first 69 weeks of years (483) of the prophet Daniel, then it will not exist on earth during the 70th week of Daniel. The Church began (Acts 2) and will end (I Thess 4) in this time warp (time gap) that was a mystery never made known to the prophets (Eph.3). I will not call another brother a heretic over this doctrine if we will consent to unite in resisting the spiritual and temporal power of Rome. Differences in eschatology is no reason to divide our forces making us easy targets, one by one, for the Jesuits.

I also have a question concerning the founding of this country. Was this country founded by Masons or Christians, and what was the real purpose of its founding?

I address this in VAIII. Our country was composed by 97% White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Protestant Calvinists and Baptist Calvinists. Our founding fathers were preachers like Hooker, Samuel Davies, John Clarke, Roger Williams, John Lehland, Timothy Dwight, John Witherspoon and a host of other Baptist and Presbyterian AV1611 Bible-beleivers who hated the spiritual and temporal power of the Pope. Though the Jesuits used their high Freemasons (Jefferson and Franklin) to foment the Revolution, the Lord's men (Washington and Madison) were those used to foil the purposes of the Order in setting up their Masonic New Atlantis. That victory would have to wait until the War between the States (1861-1865) and on the nation's ruins, the wicked 14th Amendment (1868) creating the Black Pope' "Holy Roman" 14th Amendment, Corporate-Fascist, Socialist-Communist American Empire. We were once a Constitutional Calvinist Republic; by 1868 the Republic had been converted into a Jesuit Empire to use our Protestant and Baptist blood and treasure to restore the Pope's Temporal Power around the earth, especially in Russia (Bolshevik Revolution) and Europe (the Second Thirty Years' War, 1914-1945).

Have we really been just a British colony the past 200 years or so?

No. That is a bold-faced lie. Our Calvinist Sovereign States founded in 1776 (called by the Dutch "the Kingdom of Calvin") were declared to be "free, independent and sovereign" at the Treaty of Paris in 1783. Our resultant Constitution, uniting these Sovereign States for certain limited purposes (as declared by Jefferson and Madison's Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions (1798-99), created a Federated Confederate Republic of Sovereign States ("These United States of America") by 1787. We PRACTICALLY lost our sovereignty through five events:

1. The 14th Amendment declared ratified in 1868 reversing the origin and charater of US citizenship originally conferred by Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution;

2. The establishment of the Pope's private corporation called the Federal Reserve Bank taking the power of the purse away from Congress;

3. The creation of the Pope's private corporate collection agency called the Internal Revenue Service ("we must be able to finance our Crusades while destroying the "accursed heretic and liberal" White Protestant Middle Class with a socialist-communist income tax");

4. The loss of our circulating gold coins in 1933 and silver coins in 1964 including Masonic FDR's declaration of national bankruptcy (HJR-192) and Masonic LBJ's Vietnam War;5. Masonic "Dirty Harry" Truman's Emergency War Powers Act passed in late December, 1950, preparing for the no-win and distractionary Korean War (1950-53) further enabling the Pope's Vatican Ratlines to effect the escape Europe's Nazis under the guise of "fighting Soviet communism" built by FDR.From then on (1950), all US flags flown in our courts and banks have been trimmed in gold fringe---denoting both our courts (state and federal) and our banks to be under the immediate control of the Commander-in-Chief. (They are patterned after London's "the King's Bench," and "the King's Bank;" we no longer have an Article 3, Judicial Branch (Supreme Court) of government separate from the Executive Branch (the President/Commander-in-Chief). The Supreme Court is really a servant of the President, as we indeed witnessed with the Court's Bush appointment over Gore.)

These acts of High Treason resulted in our DE FACTO reunion with Britain, the once Protestant British Empire having been under Jesuit control since King George III (as correctly proven by Saussy's Rulers of Evil). So yes, today we are a DE FACTO British Colony subject to Rome through Washington (Pratt House/CFR), as Rome controls Britain through the Old City of London (Chatham House/RIIA). In 1787 we were, if fact, really free, independent and sovereign thanks to the Lord and His many interventions during the Revolution. J. T. Headley's The Chaplins and Clergy of the Revolution (1864) is without parallel.

I have more than a passing interest because I had a 6th-great-grandfather, Eli Adams (8th cousin once removed of President John Adams) who fought in the Revolution--in fact, my mother's talking about joining the Daughters of the American Revolution. (She's a member of the Daughters of Union Vets of the Civil War and I've passed information on to her concerning Jesuit involvement in the war. Bartley Crawford, my great-great-great-grandfather, was in the Union Army, and he was a great-grandson of Eli Adams.) I keep hearing so many conflicting things and it's really confusing.

The Northern and Southern People were hoodwinked by their treasonous, Jesuit-controlled leaders. Rome had used its control over her Northern men in Congress to oppress the essentially Protestant Southern people since the days of Andrew Jackson and the tariff agitation. (Jackson saved the Union with his veto over the continuance of the United States Bank, for which the Senate hated and censored him.) With the Southern States exercising their lawful right to withdraw from the Union (secession), the cry to save the Union was the basis for the Army of the Potomac to invade Virginia after Masonic President Buchanan incited the attack at Fort Sumpter in South Carolina.With the war now ignited, Rome had two cards to play:

1. If the South should win, then the Jesuits would use Jefferson Davis to unite with Maxmillian in Mexico (who overthrew Mexico's greatest patriot, Benito Juarez) to destroy the Calvinist Federal Union and capture Washington for the Pope. The Jesuits were to then create a new North American Empire including Canada, Mexico and the US---now in the offing via the "North American Union!"

2. If the North should win, then the Jesuits would further trample the White Protestant Southern People into the dust via the wicked Thaddeus Stevens' and Charles Sumner's Reconstruction Act which would include marshall law, the 14th Amendment, and the reconstruction grand theft of the South. Since the iniquity of the White Americans had not yet come to the full, the Holy Spirit, upon command from the risen Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ (the Spirit restraining the devil's "mystery of niquity"), permitted plan 2 to succeed.Your relative, though believing he was saving the Union (which war was deceptively turned into a Crusade to emancipate the servant Blacks, one third of whom were Bible-believing men, and thus better off than the Black pagan savages in Africa), in fact was used to destroy the old Calvinist Republic. This same deception is now being employed by Fox News, Bush and Co. to incite young Americans to "fight the War in Iraq." By so doing, they are destroying their own nation. But then our iniquity as a nation of both Whites and Blacks, committing crimes as 14th Amendment citizens, has now come to the full, or so it seems.

I hope to somehow get hold of a copy of VA III. Lately I've been really interested in history...I find that with me it goes hand in hand with Biblical and genealogical studies. I remember sitting in eighth-grade American history class and asking why in the world do we have to study history anyway (I was being cute). Now, twenty years later, it's pretty obvious!

Agreed! I hated history too as it was made irrevelant to present day life.

Thanks for taking time to read and answer my questions, Eric. It's hitting me that things in this world are not what they seem...people are content to sit around with a beer in one hand, a remote in the other, watching American Idol, and as long as they can do that, it's all good. Reminds me of the proles in 1984.(I have to throw in this anecdote...my mother works for an answering service, and someone called in and complained their cable box in one room wasn't working. My mother suggested that they watch TV in another room--they didn't want to do that, they HAD to watch it in THAT ROOM. On top of that, they told my mother to get a life! Don't you wish that the worst problem you had to face was the cable box going out? This country is going down the tubes and they're complaining about the idiot box.)

Well said.Sister xxxxxxxxxx

Sincerely in Faith,

Brother Eric


_________________

So it would be accurate to say that neither side was right, but rather that they were both being played? That's the way I'm starting to look at it.

No. The South was right in its exercise of the right to secede. What may have happened after that lawful secession, only God knows.I'm finding more and more that I have to set biases aside and look at the facts.

Indeed, and that is tough, especially for me!We were hoodwinked into WWII, weren't we? My dad's uncle was standing guard at Pearl Harbor the day it was bombed, and he had shrapnel in him until the day he died, in 2002.

Yes. The Arizona was blown by the Office of Naval Intelligence 13 minutes into the attack. FDR and Hirohito worked together under Jesuit advisors.

That would mean that my maternal granduncle died for nothing...he died in the Battle of Kasserine Pass in 1943. He was not even 24.

Yes. He unknowingly was fighting a Papal Crusade in North Africa for the future re-establishment of the Pope's Kingdom of Jerusalem. My father who yet lives was another deceived young army airman bombing Germany from a B-17. He thinks I am crazy and has very little to do with me.

I come from a pretty patriotic (and slightly militaristic, I think) family...my dad was in the 82nd Airborne, I have a stepbrother who was in the Marines...that's all well and good, but I can't call anyone a hero if they're fighting an unjust, illegal war such as Iraq.

Agreed. It is nothing more than another Papal Crusade at the expense of American blood and treasure. No soldier should go overseas to fight any war even as Major General Smedley Butler declared in his War Is A Racket.

My husband's brother has a stepson in Iraq too. I also have a cousin on my birth father's side who's stationed in Fort Bragg, and I think he went overseas too. While I like the idea of so many of my relatives serving our country, I do not like the idea of them being cannon fodder for someone's agenda. (So could you please pray for Steven Kellhofer and for my cousin Brian Omell?)

Our soldiers are serving the Archbishop of New York; they are not serving our country. We need them here to fight the alien invaders and foreign troops now in country. Iraq is a distraction serving to further disarm America of her top notch fighting troops. I have prayed for Steven and Brian, that they would refuse to go overseas and be prepared to fight here.

Know what, my husband agrees with your views on race. I do too. My husband's just a little more vocal...we see a mixed-race couple on the street and I have to hear about it from him! He doesn't jump on me, he just expresses his viewpoint.

Good. Amalgmation of the races is sin and a violation of God's separation of the races for which reason He created the races. A "nation" is a people denoted by their race, language and culture inhabiting a specific geographical area. Thus, the US is not a nation but an Empire composed of many nations, and is destined to fall as did Rome for violating God's racial, linguistic, and geographically nationalistic laws.

I'm still a little confused on eschatology...but I'll re-read your e-mail and do some studying. You know what, my husband and I used to be in the Worldwide Church of God cult (we left several years ago...that's where I met him in fact)...but interestingly enough I was always drawn to the King James Bible.
Great! Glad to hear that you left the cult and embrace the English Bible of the Reformation.

Sister Alexandra

Sincerely in Faith,

Brother Eric