I will not be Intimidated

From myriad consecutive weeks, the 911 Truth Movement have been unfairly demonized. Numerous of 911 Truth Patriots are inaccurately characterized as akin to Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites, acquiring no evidence to back their assertions (they forget about the proof presented by Professor Steven Jones outlining molten steel and thermite as a possible explosive in the WTCs) and hurting the victims (whom a lot of victims either want a new, indepedent in investigation of 911 or believe that 911 was an inside job. Also, the victims were hurt by dust and abestos with the government covering that up for a while). Bill O'Reilly and Joe Scraborough (both Neo-Cons. Joe is a p.c. Neo con, who's afraid now to show his views, but Joe is sucking up to neo-liberals aka establishment "progressives") have been at the forefront of the CFR-run mainstream media campaign in demonizing people. I have my qualms with Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen, but they are 100% right to question the offical story of 911. Here's some facts that O'Reilly doesn't want the people to comprehend. The South Tower fell first when the North tower had a direct hit in it (also hydrocarbon fire's maximum temperature is 1517 degrees F., while the melting point of steel is 2750 degree F. Most of the feul was gone from the South Tower). Blast points can be seen in the images of the Tower before they fell. The pulverization of concrete, molten steel, etc. can't be a product of fire alone. Witnesses like firefighters heard explosives in the Towers (including the basement where it wasn't hit) before their collapses. No modern steel skyscraper before 911 fell by fire alone. An expert of architecture named Kevin Ryan said that jet feul couldn't melt the columns in WTC #1 and 2. As early as 1995, the U.S. was warned of a plan of utilizing hijacked aircraft in attacking America. Building Number Seven collapsed by itself with no plane hitting it. Its columns in the center fell first then its perimeter fell second in a limited area. Larry Silverstein had a big insurance policy of the structure.


Back years ago in 2001 and 2002, I've learned more about leaders and early Christians who opposed Catholic doctrines. One such man was Vigiliantius of the 400's A.D. He disagreed with the prayers of the dead and celibacy. Peter Waldo denied the literal presence of the Eucharist plus purgatory in the 1100's. John Wycliffe of the 1300's A.D. helped create a Bible for the common man to read since back then most Bible-ownership was controlled by the church in Europe. The lessons of these great heroes is to note be intimidated by no human plus maintain your indepedent thinking (or discernment). Explosure of evil from the brutality of population control, the threat of genetically modified foods, and religious liberty threats (this went into a higher level via the Masonic Supreme Court limiting religious expression from the public schools in 1962 and 1963 ought to be made known. Real searchers of the truth (regardless of race, nationality, ideology, etc.) will have to keep fighting by our speech, then pen, and by our deeds. Works alone don't save, but doing nothing will equate to failure in our obligations as well. As for the alternative media, some in it still refuse to talk about the Vatican. I wonder why?

By Timothy