http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=35736
Late President Truman Connects Vatican to Supporting Nazi Party and Bringing Hitler to Power
In a little known letter to Pope Pius XII reprinted in a South American publication in 1959, Truman blasted the Pope and Vatican saying, in part: "First, the founding Fathers of this great nation knew that throughout history, the nature of your church is love for politics and war."
By Greg Szymanski
Nov. 9, 2007
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/9-Nov-2007.html
Although former President Harry S. Truman was a high-level Freemason with connections to the Jesuits, he did have the courage to connect the Vatican and Pope Pius XII to supporting the Nazi party and bringing Hitler to power.
In a little known letter sent the Pope, who he addresses irreverently as Mr. Pacelli, Truman leaves Americans a clear road map about the Vatican's fascist intentions and its leadership in what is now known as the New World Order.
Truman's scathing letter, however, raises serious speculation about
whether he was used as a unknowing pawn by the Vatican and Jesuits when
he dropped the "Big Bomb or whether he knew the Vatican was controlling both sides of the war?
Another question must also be asked and that is why U.S. Presidents in
the modern era are all "kissing the Pope's slippers" and calling him
"Your Holiness" when Truman in his "The buck stops here" style said point
blank to Pacelli that the title of your Holiness "belongs only to the
Creator of the Universe."
Furthermore, the question must be asked if Truman had the sense to connect
the Vatican to the Nazi Party and New World Order why doesn't the
mainstream media and most of the big shot alternative alternative media
stars like Alex Jones, Jeff Rense and Texe Marrs do the same?
The answer, of course, is obvious say many Vatican researchers, saying
the abovementioned people are obviously controlled by the Jesuit and
Vatican-led New World Order.
The following letter written by Truman to Pope Pius XII appeared in the
magazine Revista Nacional de Informacion y Cultura Occidental #118
Mayo-Junio 1959 pp 30-32 Santiago, Chile and is translated from Spanish
to English.
Letter from The Former Late President of the United States Mr. Harry
Truman to Pope Pius XII.
Washington D.C.
Dear Mr. Pacelli:
As a member of the Baptist Church and Executive Chief of this Great
Nation and the most powerful nation in the whole world, everyone calls me
Mr. Truman. I can not call you, "Holiness" as this title belongs only to the
Creator of the Universe. We also in the United States consider all men
are equal in the eyes of the Creator and we call them by their own names.
For the same reason I must address you as Mr. Pacelli.
The people that elected me as their Executive Chief are a peace loving
people and a democratic nation. For this reason my duty is to find
collaboration from those that are in reality looking for peace and are
working to obtain peace and not from those pushing for war. I believe
that yourself and neither your church are included with those that are
truly working for peace. First, the founding Fathers of this great nation
knew that throughout history, the nature of your church is love for
politics and war.
They consented as a principle of our government, not to allowed your church to be involved in our internal affairs. They learned this too well from the History in Europe. We are convinced that our democracy will not last if we get in the mixture of all of your doctrines and intrigue, as the governments of Europe did. We know that you yourself and the Kaiser were part of the intrigue created against the Allies during the First War World.
You also spent 12 years in Germany during the ascension on Hitler to
power. You also negotiated with the execrable Fritz Von Papen a double
Pope to help Hitler to power, as you signature is found Eugenio Cardinal
Pacelli along with Hitler signature in the concordant between the Vatican
and the Third Reich in 1933.
Nobody is going to believe that you were ignorant of the plot Hitler and
his Nazis got under way against us. The number one catholic biographer
said referring about yourself "The more well informed man in the Reich".
After that Von Papen and yourself signed the concordant which blessed
Hitler with 'holy-water' and gave him the needed push to power. Your
colleague Von Papen after he escape from the gallows by an inch, boasted
as follow:
"The Third Reich is the first power that you not only recognized, but put
into practice the high principles of the papacy".
Your cardinals and bishops in Rome blessed the weapons used against the
defenseless Ethiopians. Cardinal Schuter of Milan proclaimed the
annexation of Ethiopia as a holy-crusade to bring to Ethiopia in triumph
the cross of Christ. And after all of these, Can you still call your
church the church of God? Also, Do you pretend that I still see you as
superior to me and superior to the people of the United States?, You are
using sweet words to talk about justice and at the same time playing the
drums of war calling for another war more terrible and destructive that
the two past wars against Russia, which helped us to defeat Hitler and
Mussolini.
You are inciting the United States to rush into building diabolic and
detestable regimes, You want us to waste our money, and to send our young
people to a horrible death over the remains of Hitler and Mussolini to
finish the work they started with your help after we defeated them. Yes,
the United States longs for peace. From all the nations we still have
some prosperity, and decency, as we are the bastion for democratic
freedom.
If we, as protestant England get weak and loose our substance, your
"catholic culture" will have another opportunity to govern the world
again. You can easily after get an alliance with Russia against us, if we
were to loose, or fall weak after a war of that nature.
Your predecessor pope Pius XI declared publicly, 'For the interest of the
church, I will go as far as getting a concordant with the devil' For
these reason Mr. Pacelli is my duty as the head of this protestant
nation, to reject this adventure disguised as a peace treaty. "Those
eating in the same dish as the Devil, must use a very long spoon".
I will continue working for peace as a member of the Baptist Faith,
holding and working with honorable protestant principles, as they have
made our nation so great.
Yours Sincerely
Harry Truman.
Regarding Truman's affiliation as Grand Master of Missouri Freemasonry,
Paul Bessel did some research about Masonic and Anti-Masonic Presidents
of the United States. Here is what Bessel found:
Masonic and Anti-Masonic Presidents of the United States
presented at Federal Lodge #1, F.A.A.M., of the District of Columbia
February 9, 1998, by Paul M. Bessel
Which U.S. Presidents were Freemasons?
1 George Washington (Pres. 1789-1797)(MM 1753)
2 James Monroe (Pres. 1817-1825)(MM 1776)
3 Andrew Jackson (1829-1837)(MM 1800?)(Fedl #1 1830)
4 James K. Polk (Pres. 1845-1849)(MM 1820)
5 James Buchanan (Pres. 1857-1861)(MM 1817)
6 Andrew Johnson (Pres. 1865-1869)(MM 1851)
7 James A. Garfield (Pres. 1881)(MM 1864)
8 William McKinley (Pres. 1897-1901)(MM 1865)
9 Theodore Roosevelt (Pres. 1901-1909)(MM 1901)
10 William H. Taft (Pres. 1909-1913)(MM 1901)
11 Warren G. Harding (Pres. 1921-1923)(MM 1920)
12 Franklin D. Roosevelt (Pres. 1933-1945)(MM 1911)
13 Harry S. Truman (Pres. 1945-1953)(MM 1909)
14 Gerald R. Ford (Pres. 1974-1977)(MM 1951)
Discussion: Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Lyndon B. Johnson, Abraham
Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Ronald
Reagan, Bill Clinton
Were Masonic U.S. Presidents active in the Craft?
Harry S. Truman was Grand Master of Missouri, an enthusiastic Masonic
ritualist, and Master of lodges while an active politician. He attended
Masonic lodge meetings while campaigning, and while he was President of
the U.S., and he wrote, "The greatest honor that has ever come to me, and
that can ever come to me in my life, is to be Grand Master of Masons in
Missouri"
On the other hand, for some of the Presidents who were Masons there is
little or no evidence that they attended lodge meetings or said anything
about their Masonic memberships.
Were there U.S. Presidents who were actively opposed to Freemasonry?
John Quincy Adams ran for Congress as a representative of the Antimasonic
Party. He hoped Freemasonry would disappear from America. He wrote that
his father, John Adams, also a U.S. President, decided not to join
because "there was nothing in the Masonic Institution worthy of his
seeking to be associated with it."
Why was John Quincy Adams opposed to Freemasonry?
Adams wrote that Freemasonry was tainted by its oaths, penalties, ritual,
and the actions of its leaders and members. He was incensed by the
evidence that Masons had kidnapped and killed William Morgan in upstate
New York in 1826, and by the evidence that Masons helped brethren who
were accused of having participated in these crimes.
Adams said Masonic ritual, titles, and practices were childish,
ridiculous, foolish, harmful, and against the basic principles of
democracy and equality, and respect for the laws of the U.S.
What did Presidents who were Masons say about Freemasonry?
President William McKinley said in 1901 that the brotherhood of fraternal
societies was similar to the brotherhood of "equal citizenship" in the
U.S.
Theodore Roosevelt, said in 1902, "One of the things that attracted me so
greatly to Masonry . . . was that it really did live up to what we, as a
government, are pledged to -- of treating each man on his merits as a
Man"
Franklin D. Roosevelt said, "The more I come in contact with the work of
the Masonic Fraternity the more impressed I am by the great charitable
work and the great practical good which we are carrying out."
How much was George Washington involved in Masonic activities?
George Washington became a Mason at age 20 in 1753. He may have attended
about 9 lodge meetings during the remaining 46 years of his life, and
probably never presided over any lodge.
However, George Washington wrote letters in which he said he was happy to
be a Mason, and also, in 1791, describing Masonry as being "founded in
justice and benevolence," and "the grand object of Masonry is to promote
the happiness of the human race."
But, when he was asked more specifically about Freemasonry in 1798, he
wrote, ". . . So far as I am acquainted with the principles and Doctrines
of Free Masonry, I conceive them to be founded on benevolence and to be
exercised for the good of mankind. If it has been a Cloak to promote
improper or nefarious objects, it is a melancholly [sic] proof that in
unworthy hands, the best institutions may be made use of to promote the
worst designs."
Conclusion
Freemasonry has played a significant role in the history of the United
States, so it influenced most or all of our Presidents. Some U.S.
Presidents who were Freemasons were great, some failures, and some
average.
Presidents have spoken of Freemasonry's good work on behalf of charity
and helping others. George Washington and Theodore Roosevelt also spoke
of Freemasonry as an institution that teaches us how to get along in
society, with respect for the equality of everyone, tolerance of
differences among people, and taking action for that which is right.
Questions to think about and discuss
How well are Masons today carrying on the ideals referred to by Masonic
Presidents?
Does Freemasonry now promote equality and tolerance of all races, colors,
ethnic backgrounds, lifestyles?
Why do current politicians who are Masons keep that quiet?
Is it true that "Masons today appear to be more concerning with
perpetuation of the imagined past than they are with adaptation to a
present that is real," and, "... that Masons in another day ... did not
hesitate to promote the well-being of mankind, even to the point of
putting themselves at the cutting edge of movements organized to achieve
social and political change."
What can we do to promote strong leadership, maintain the best of what we
have in the Craft, and reestablish the best of what we were in the past,
so we may again have proud Masonic Presidents of the United States?
Bibliography
Adams, John Q. Letters and Opinions of the Masonic Institution. Lorenzo
Stratton publishers, Cincinnati, 1951.
Boyden, William L. "Our Masonic Presidents." The Short Talk Bulletin.
Masonic Service Association of the United States. July 1933.
Cerza, Alphonse. Anti-Masonry. Missouri Lodge of Research, 1962.
Coil, Henry W. Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia. Revised edition by Allen E.
Roberts. Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Co., Inc., 1996.
Denslow, Ray V. Freemasonry and the Presidency, U.S.A. Missouri Lodge of
Research, 1952.
Denslow, William R. 10,000 Famous Freemasons. Missouri Lodge of Research,
1959.
Miner, Stewart W. Let Your Work Become Your Mark. Anchor Communications,
Highland Springs, Virginia, 1986.
Roberts, Allen E. Brother Truman: The Masonic Life and Philosophy of
Harry S. Truman. Anchor Communications, Highland Springs, Virginia, 1985.
Roberts, Allen E. Freemasonry in American History. Macoy Publishing and
Masonic Supply Co., Inc., Richmond, Virginia, 1985.
Roberts, Allen E. G. Washington: Master Mason. Macoy Publishing and
Masonic Supply Co., Inc., Richmond, Virginia, 1976.
Sachse, Julius F. Masonic Correspondence of Washington as found among the
Washington papers in the Library of Congress. Grand Lodge of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1915.
Stone, William L. Letters on Masonry and Anti-Masonry, addressed to the
Hon. John Quincy Adams. O. Halsted, New York, 1832.
Tatsch, J. Hugo. The Facts About George Washington as a Freemason. Macoy
Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, New York, 1931.
-----------------------------
Editor's Note: For those who doubt the Vatican's leadership in the New
World Order, Truman's words hidden by the media and government should
provide solid evidence to the contrary. Furthermore, ask all media figures in the mainstream and alternative media and government officials to comment on this letter. If they don't, then they are covering for the Vatican.
_________
He would never say anything to criticize the Vatican, claim researchers like Eric Jon Phelps, since the Grand Master of Missouri Freemasonry was nothing more than a Jesuit shill
By Greg Szymanski, JD
Nov. 11, 2007
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/11-Nov-2007.html
More information has come forward indicating the letter circulating
around the internet where former President Harry Truman chastised Pope Pius XII for his involvement with Hitler and the Nazi Party was nothing more than a hoax.
Although the historical facts presented in the letter found in a Nov. 9, 2007, article in the Arctic Beacon archives are true about the Vatican's Nazi connection and their 1933 concordat with Hitler, the words could not have been penned by Truman since, according to several researchers, "Dirty Harry" as he is known by the Japanese, was working "hand in glove" with the Jesuit Order and Vatican hierarchy.
Asked in a past interview how does Shriner Freemason President Harry Truman’s signing into law of the Emergency War Powers Act of 1950 factor into the Jesuit Agenda, Eric Jon Phelps, author of Vatican Assassins, said:
First of all, Harry Truman, who the Japanese called “Dirty Harry”—when
they heard the movie Dirty Harry came out, they thought it was a movie
about Harry Truman, according to my Japanese pastor friend, Daniel Fuji,
who has passed away.
Harry Truman was put in office by the Jesuits, the Pensergast Democratic
machine in Missouri. Harry Truman takes over after FDR’s murder, because
he was murdered in the home of Bernard Baruch. When he did that, he then
finished up the war with the hoax called the dropping of the nuclear
bombs, to purposely create this greater hoax called the Cold War, that
would enable the Vatican to knock over country after country after
country, and replace the leaders with dictators, subordinate to the Pope.
That was the purpose of the Cold War.
And so, when Harry Truman in 1950 signed into law the Emergency War
Powers Act, the Cold War was in full force. They were building bomb
shelters, etc. So the nation was in kind of a frenzy.
When he signed this into law, it put the whole country under military or
martial law, and that’s when the flags in every courtroom, state and
federal, began to be changed. And every state flag and every U.S. flag
is now trimmed in gold fringe. And whenever you see a flag trimmed in
gold fringe, that means that it is the flag of the Commander-in-Chief.
Now, if it’s the state flag, it means that’s the flag of the governor, as
Commander-in-Chief. And if it’s the federal flag, or the national flag,
more correctly, it’s the flag of the Commander-in-Chief in Washington.
So, all your courts are nothing more than courts of military rule. They
all proceed with summary procedures. The jury has no power of jury
nullification. And they are simply enforcing the laws of the Empire,
which I call 14th Amendment America, which is a military-style, King of
England-style country. The courts are nothing more than courts of the
king’s bench, as you can see in Blackstone’s Commentaries.
And the banks, as you walk into every bank, they all have a flag trimmed
in gold fringe. The bank is what England would call, in Blackstone’s day,
the king’s bank. So, we have the king’s bank, and we have the king’s
bench. And it’s run according to military rule, according to
Berkheimer’s great work Military Rule And Martial Law, published in 1914.
When Harry Truman did this, there was a consummation of a great plan to
put us under the Emergency War Powers Act and, actually, a war rule.
“Daylight savings time” is what was called “war time”. This country only
went to daylight savings time during World War II, and they called it, at
that time, war time. So, nothing’s changed. We’ve never gone back to
not turning back our clocks. We’re still on war time. The income tax is
a war tax. It was called a victory tax in 1942.
So, people are paying a war tax, they’re under war time, they’re under an
emergency war powers act, and the courts are war courts.
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=35691
____________
Dear Eric;
On Greg's Tuesday program Leo said G. Edward Griffin was going to help him on the "Tour of Hope". I know Griffin's writing is interesting and I don't disagree with his opinions, but according to Bill Lyne, Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch Society was a Shriner Freemason.
Correct. Welch as a tool of Cold Warrior Jesuit Edmund Walsh and was baptized into the RCC on his deathbed as was the wicked Thaddeus Stevens---one of the creators of the pope's 14th Amendment American Empire.
Lyne said the John Birch Society was patterned after the communist cell model to keep the pro and anti-Masons apart. Lyne also confirmed Welch sold his candy business to Nelson Rockefeller at an inflated price so that Welch would be able to give the Society full time. Members of the CFR were early Birch leaders.
Agreed. And the Order named the John Birch Society after a Baptist missionary who was murdered by Mao Zedong at the behest of Knight of Malta OSS director, Wild Bill Donovan. The Jesuits were uniting Protestants, Baptists and Roman Catholics against the straw dog of communism controlled from Washington and London.
People's opinions and beliefs can change over time, but someone with more information than I have (like you) may know more about Griffin today. I know Griffin was used by members of the Birch Society early in its history. Lyne wrote three books about suppressed technology.
I am convinced that Griffin is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor. He is featured in Jewish Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Aaron Roussu's video, America: From Freedom to Fascism. Griffin never says one word about the Vatican, Knights of Malta, the Jesuits, or Opus Dei. He blames everything on the Masons and the CFR---as do all good Jesuit shills.
Yours,
Bxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
_________
JagDRS: This is interesting commentary. For the most part, I've always been fascinated by Griffin's work, in large part because he helps paint a picture of history which I could have never imagined prior to finding his work. Yes, his work does in fact draw a line so to speak. He exposes the Fabians, RIIA/CFR, collectivists, and such, but now that I think of it, it is curious that he exposed the CFR without ever much (if any) mention of the Rothschild influence upon the CFR. I don't ever remember him broaching the Vatican and as far as this goes, I have seldom seen him broach the elements of Jewry making up the conspiracy. To qualify, I have not read his Jeckyl Island (Bankers/Fed Reserve) expose', so maybe he does out the Jews a bit in that work....? About the closest he comes to mentioning the Jesuits is a slight indirect mention by way of talking about Quigley's books written while professor of Georgetown and being hallowed mentor of slick Billy.
On this topic, I've now finished reading (and cleaning up....formatting) Be Wise As Serpents, having finished the last few chapters in the past couple days. One of those chapters provided a brief blurb from Fritz on Quigley (from Chapter 3.3 - Financial Wizards and Wealthy Cults).
=======
The Rothschilds were closely related to the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Although many people today would not view the CFR as a secret society it was originally set up as part of a secret society and it was kept secret for many years, in spite of its awesome power. Carroll Quigley, professor of International Relations at the Jesuit Georgetown University, exposed the Round Table Group with his book Tragedy and Hope. 34
34. Carroll Quigley's book was very enlightening on the New World Order except that it leaves out the Catholic Church and the Jesuits' participation, at a time that their participation was increasing dramatically. In other words, Quigley's book must be taken with a grain of salt, it would be a mistake to believe it to be infallible or unbiased.
========
This is off topic, but now that it's taken me nearly 2 months to read all of BWAS, there is a burning question that I've for about 2 months now; does Eric Phelps have an opinion on Fritz's work? In a way, it's difficult to imagine that he does not have one but maybe the one he has is not one he wants to publicly state...? It's also interesting to me that Fritz and the bulk of his work, chronologically, came well befor Eric hit the scene. When I began reading BWAS, right away the obvious similarities between Fritz and Eric jumped out at me. However, as I continued reading, I eventually began to notice some distinct differences between the two. Fritz definitely mentions (repeatedly) the Jesuits as a formidable power, but he does not make them his main thesis / focus the way Eric does. Also, while Fritz makes no bones about being a devout Christian and believer in the Holy Bible, as far as his public statements, he does not in anyway appear to be locked into any particualr version, be it KJV or other... at least, Fritz never beats the reader over the head with his sentiments or preferences for a given bible of choice the way Phelps does. Anyway, it would be nice to see what Eric's view on Fritz and Fritz's work is.
Back to Griffin, I personally am not convinced that every single person on earth who does not make the Jesuit Order the focus of their research is by implication a witting Jesuit Coadjutor. I realize that this definitely goes against the grain of what Eric teaches. Granted, Griffin, for whatever reason, tends to be much more conservative in his work, and I can see some virtues in this approach as far as being able to get people interested in conspiracy in general. For one thing, I suspect that Griffin realizes that he would lose a lot of audience if he were to delve deeper into the conspiracy by going higher up the chain than what he otherwise does. The Jesuits are only one among several groups that Griffin does not spend time delving into. He may have evil intentions behind this, he may not, I dunno.
__________
This Knight of Malta helped cause the Stock Market Crash in 1929 and helped to put 33 Degree FDR into the White House. Thus it was the Knights who were behind FDR's Emergency War Powers Act of March 9, 1933 and HJR-192 that took gold out of circulation, bankruped the states and thus the people of the states, created the "Strawman" for every 14th Amendment American citizen as soon as JHR-192 was passed, and thus gave us this artificial person alter ego whose name is spelled with all capital letters.
Every Protestant and Baptist preacher should know this.
Brother Eric
http://www.nndb.com/people/197/000058023/
John J. Raskob
AKA John Jakob Raskob
Born: 12-Mar-1879
Birthplace: Lockport, NY
Died: 14-Oct-1950
Location of death: Centreville, MD
Cause of death: Heart Failure
Gender: Male
Religion: Roman Catholic
Race or Ethnicity: White
Sexual orientation: Straight
Occupation: Business, Government
Nationality: United States
Executive summary: Built the Empire State Building
Immensely wealthy American financier gave an interview to Samuel Crowther of the Ladies' Home Journal in which he proposed that everyone invest heavily in the stock market. In fact, he advocated buying stocks on margin:
Suppose a man marries at the age of twenty-three and begins a regular savings of fifteen dollars a month -- and almost anyone who is employed can do that if he tries. If he invests in good common stocks and allows the dividends and rights to accumulate, he will at the end of twenty years have at least eighty thousand dollars[...] I am firm in my belief than anyone not only can be rich but ought to be rich.
Raskob's scenario implies a phenomenal 26% annual yield on the young man's stock investments. As it happens, the article (entitled Everybody Ought to be Rich) arrived at newsstands in August 1929, just two months before the calamitous market crash.
Raskob was among the plotters attempting to depose Franklin D. Roosevelt by force in 1933. Smedley Butler ultimately blew the whistle on the scheme.
Brother: William Frederick Raskob
Wife: Helena Springer Green (12 children)
DuPont (1900-46)
Member of the Board of General Motors (1915-28)
Democratic National Committee Chairman (1931-32)
Democratic National Committee Chairman (1929)
Knights of Malta Treasurer
Do you know something we don't?
Submit a correction or make a comment about this profile
JOHN J. and HELENA (GREENE) RASKOB
The new church was made possible chiefly through the generosity of John J. Raskob, whose wife's ancestors had lived in the area. Mr. Raskob channelled funds through the Catholic Foundation of the Diocese of Wilmington, Inc., which assumed the entire $60,000 cost of constuction,. The parishioners share in the enterprise was to provide the furnishings and equipment of the building.
http://www.stdennischurch.org/History.htm
_________
We must remember that the Jesuit Order has controlled Islam for at least the last 200 years, that the pope's Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists aided and abbetted the Jesuits in the Order's Eurasian Jewish Holocaust, that the Vatican's secret but true policy was to establish the nation of Israel which the pope considers his "Kingdom of Jerusalem," and that neither the devil of the risen Son of
God desire the destruction of the nation of Israel.
In the coming war in Israel, many Jews will be killed in obedience to the Canon Law, but Israel will never be destroyed. Its new protector will be the pope's EU once the West falls after this successful crusade against Islam and the fall of the once White Anglo Saxon Protestant nations of Western Civilization.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
----- Original Message -----
From: Eliezer
To: "Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@priv-edtnaa05.telusplanet.net
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 3:03 AM
Subject: Fw: THE VATICAN & THE JEWISH PEOPLE THROUGH THE AGES
----- Original Message -----
From: Gail Winston
To: gwinston@interaccess.com
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 4:01 PM
Subject: THE VATICAN & THE JEWISH PEOPLE THROUGH THE AGES
WINSTON MID EAST ANALYSIS & COMMENTARY November 10, 2007 Email: gwinston@interaccess.com Please disseminate & re-post. If you publish, send us a copy. Many of our articles appear on Websites at http://www.gamla.org.il/english & freeman.org Outgoing mail is virus-checked. To be removed from this list, please send your Email address
THE VATICAN & THE JEWISH PEOPLE THROUGH THE AGES by Emanuel A. Winston, Mid East Analyst & Commentator
As you read the following, please keep in mind the upcoming Annapolis Conference and its ultimate purpose.
I have been reading a novel entitled "The Confessor" by Daniel Silva about the Vatican and the Jewish people. (1) I remind the reader that adventure novels written by authors who are expert in their fields - often base their stories on facts in real life and historical research.
For example, when I read the adventure novel "The Assassins" by Oliver North (2), I could sort out the facts from his imagination since I also write about geo-politics, weapons, war, terror (by any means), intelligence, etc. North was not only writing an adventure story, he was also subtly recommending the just assassination of evil leaders who enslaved their own people. The book was the message, given North’s earlier life of dealing with terrorists summarily.
Within that mix I have read voraciously and written voluminously for over 40 years about Genocide against the Jews, anti-Semitism, the death camps, methods of torture and the nations or individuals who thrived on all of the above. With the Annapolis Conference on the horizon, I thought about North’s fantasy and Silva’s novel on the Vatican’s darker side.
So, why am I telling you all this? Simply because within the adventure novel by Daniel Silva entitled "The Confessor" specifically, there is a great deal of information and food for thought about the Catholic Church, despite it being framed as an imaginative adventure novel.
Let’s get to it. Shall we? First, a caveat: Israel’s true Christian friends know this article refers to a faction who have misused their credentials as Christians for self-serving evil deeds. We recognize and appreciate our Christian Zionist allies who have come to our defense. We honor the righteous Gentiles who saved some of our people - especially during the Holocaust.
Silva’s book speaks about the intrigues of the Catholic Church through its many secret institutions, well beyond ministering to religion. In Silva’s story, a Jewish/Israeli researcher is murdered for the book he is writing and the information contained in it about one of the Church’s operational arms and what the Vatican had approved during WW2. Israel’s intelligence service had sent a special agent to track down the killer or killers. This agent had previously tracked down the killers of the 17 Israeli athletes at the Olympics in Germany September 5 and 6, 1972 - by the terror organization of the PLO called "Black September" is brought into the picture. This man, Gabriel Allon, a Mossad agent and art restorer, is called on to find the murderer of the Jewish/Israeli researcher and surrounding events that provoked the operation.
The story drifts through the chase where, early on, you could see that the Vatican was involved to try covering over its active role in the Holocaust. (Note! Many authoritative, well-researched books were written about that time in history.) We know about the early planning of Adolph Hitler and his staff were dedicated to killing all the Jews of Europe and beyond - whatever countries the Nazis could conquer for their 1000 year Reich. I will refer you to a well researched book entitled "The Unholy Trinity: the Vatican, the Nazis and Soviet Intelligence" by John Loftus (an Irish Catholic lawyer and Nazi hunter) and Mark Aarons about the Catholic Church, the Concordat it signed with the Nazis and its unholy role in the Holocaust. Loftus was one of the investigating attorneys for the Nuremberg Tribunals. Interestingly, Loftus and Aarons were a source for Silva’s book "The Confessor", among other historians.
We know about the silence by the Pope who has been referred to as Hitler’s Pope: Pius XII. We know that his refusal to speak out was excused and covered over by the Vatican with the convoluted thought that, by speaking out the Pope would make it worse for the Jews - and for the Catholics under Hitler’s control. Part of the denial revolved around the Pope’s supposed lack of specific knowledge of Hitler’s "Final Jewish Solution". In Silva’s novel, there is the fictional character of a newly elected Pope of great personal integrity who wishes to open the sealed archives to the public about the Vatican’s role in the Nazi Holocaust. Thus, the planning of his assassination by Church officials. (Note! The archives, in reality, remain sealed shut to all researchers.)
It is a nonsensical excuse, given that the Church was an eye-witness, observing the round-ups. From the beginning the well-developed Intelligence arm of the Vatican both inside Hitler’s organization and outside - and the Pope himself knew of Hitler’s plan for the Jews and the role the Church was to play in a massacre that must have made the angels weep.
There is little that the Vatican did not know or could find out - IF - they wished. There is probably not one intelligence organization or government body in the entire world that does not have a mole from deep within the Vatican - sometimes at extraordinarily high levels. I am sure the Russians and Americans envy the quality of the Vatican’s intelligence penetration. Leaders of nations are often pleased to accommodate the Vatican with advance information for whatever "quid pro quo" they could trade.
Back to Silva’s Story:
The story speaks to intrigues of trust, distrust and murder when the Vatican considers it in their vital interests. In this case, their vital interests were keeping secret a meeting between the Nazis who have already decided on the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" and the Church/Vatican leaders who are brought into the plan. The Vatican was to offer its services by insuring that Pope Pius XII would not speak out against the round-up of Jews or the Genocide that follows. Some may say that this is merely the fertile imagination of a writer but, it is far more - given the existing virtual library of research dedicated to the Nazis and the Church. You can even Google it.
Not unlike the English and the Americans, they (the Vatican) were well-informed that a Genocide was taking place but chose not to acknowledge the verified Intelligence. When it did leak out, Franklin Delano Roosevelt offered the inane excuse that the Jews would be rescued only after the war was won. The expectation was that, at the rate of daily killing, no Jews would be left to rescue in all of Europe or Russia. It may be recalled that the English had broken the German code using the Brits’ Enigma de-coding machine and knew how many Jews were being executed daily which the Brits shared with U.S. Intelligence.
Thanks only to G-d, a remnant did survive and thus, because the world’s nations were "embarrassed" over their culpability in the Holocaust, the State of Israel was voted for by the new United Nations on November 29, 1947. The Annapolis Conference is now scheduled to take place on or around the 60th Anniversary of the U.N.’s vote that enabled the creation of the Jewish State of Israel. Actions taken at Annapolis may undo that historic vote - although (hopefully) many events may delay the Annapolis Conference or even cause it to be cancelled before the plan becomes operational, G-d willing.
Neither the U.S. State Department, deeply infiltrated with Jesuit missionaries who were used as diplomats from the inception of the State Department, nor the Vatican, wanted a Jewish nation to be born and thrive. They did everything they could to prevent her birth, to hamstring her growth and still today to destroy her.
But, what about the millions of decent, unquestioning faithful Church-going Catholics? The operational word here is "unquestioning". Involvement in Genocidal doctrine far exceeds the scandal of pedophiles preying on the youth from simple priests to the highest echelons of the Church. All of this was well known for hundreds of years but, was accepted in silence by the prelates of the Church. No one questioned the practice from the laity upward. Similarly, no one questioned connections to the Nazis. Past ties to Nazi Genocide cannot be ignored by the laity by saying or thinking: "I would never plan the killing of anyone, including the Jewish people. After all, Jesus was a Jew." Denial does preserve belief and one’s sanity.
Decent people who do not question and who follow blindly are not innocent by way of not seeing or looking into the evils of the Church. Leaders are not infallible and must be held to account as to their judgement. Apologizing for past misdeeds, no matter how horrendous, is not a promised cure, particularly when the Church is likely to repeat its past at Annapolis
As a relevant aside, the Church assisted Nazi war criminals to elude prosecution ;by slipping them from Churches, Convents and through to South America. This was called the "Operation Ratlines". Most escaped with valuables looted from their victims. They were well-received by various dictators who were highly paid for their cordial reception of the Nazis. The Red Cross officials were also involved by providing forged passports and using their good offices to assist in hiding the identities of the Nazi mass murderers.(3)
The book "The Confessor" goes on to explain some of the motivation of the Vatican in both eliminating the Jews and later attempting to insure that no Jewish State would arise from the ashes of those who survived. While it has been well-established through eons of history that the Church developed into the deadliest enemy of Jews everywhere, the full story is yet to surface. Underlying all of this was a well-known doctrine of struggle by the Church to establish their dominance on earth while viewing Judaism as an adversary to the growth and legitimacy of the Church.
The mere existence of Jews was to them an impediment to their claim as the rightful and only legitimate heirs to G-d’s ministry on earth (which they felt was theirs). Although they adopted a Jewish man as their Lord, nevertheless, eliminating Jews (his people) was their obsession. The Jews simply trekked forward through history, not challenging their claims. Thousands of years of Jewish history - after the Covenant G-d made with the Jewish people - were not to be accepted or tolerated but, to be viewed as merely an irritating nuisance to be explained away in later writings by imaginative priest scribes. Just the mere existence of the Jewish people denied the claims of a New Testament and the gospels of later claimed prophets.
According to the Church’s "replacement theory", there was to be a new covenant and Jews were to be replaced and not even tolerated as merely a nuisance. The Jews returning to Israel to a State of their own shocked the Church, seemingly denying teachings that the Jews were to become extinct and replaced by the Church of Rome (Edom).
To square the circle, Jews were accused of deicide and other blood libels which supported Church doctrine that Jews were not worthy to be the chosen servants of G-d and should be "replaced" by Christians.
A demonized people could not possibly be the servants of G-d. The more distance they could put between themselves and this ancient, enduring people, the better for Church mythology. Even the Jew Jesus was given a new personae. What was forgotten (or rather ignored) was that Jesus was always a Torah Jew, holding forth like all other Jewish charismatics of the time. Yet, all the Jewish laws and customs that the man they called "Lord" lived by were not adopted by the Church of Rome - which became the Vatican. While they refer to him as the Perfect Man and the Son of G-d, they could not accept him as a Torah Jew. Parenthetically, all Jews refer to G-d as their Father and themselves as the children of G-d. The reference to the "son of G-d" was an adaptation of what all Jews considered themselves to be but, not as demi-gods usually found in paganism. Even the "Moshiach" (Messiah) is anticipated by the Jews to be a man and not a god - or more like a prophet of old who could communicate with G-d as did Abraham and/or Moses.
It was imperative to distance the Church from its Jewish roots in the formation of a new religion. This was done by accusing Jews of killing G-d (therefore, deicide) and then through the centuries adding blood libels. They were very successful at demonizing and denigrating the Jews as even later painters showed Moses with horns like the devil through frescoes on Church walls and ceilings. The Church misread the Biblical explanation of Moses descending from Mt. Sinai with the tablets of Ten Commandments with horns or beams of light coming from his head. Even the Jews who were to receive the Laws of G-d showed fear for this man with light emanating from his face.
After Moses covered his glowing face to calm the people, I don’t recall if the "keren or" (horns of light) remained with Moses for the rest of his life or not. Later artists employed by the Church reinforced the misinterpretation of the Bible by rendering Moses with actual horns. The myth that Jews conspired with the devil was a frequently used theme by village priests to stir up the peasantry to assault the Jews. When Jews survived the plagues of the Middle Ages because of their personal hygiene and hand-washing - and when they came up with successful solutions in medicine, science, and the like, the "others" claimed it was because they were in league with the devil and thus gained specific knowledge.
Earlier pagan religions all had their own panoply of gods. Wars were fought over the dominance of one god over another, as demonstrated by whose army conquered. The Jews embodied the one invisible G-d which was later adopted by subsequent religions, in part. Nevertheless, the need to display vestiges of their past and the glory of chosen gods still bore the graven images of statues and other ‘things’ to worship. The lineage of the Jews, according to the Bible marked the changes in the world: Adam and Eve, Noah, Abraham and Sarah, Yitzhak and Rebecca, Jacob, Leah and Rachel, Moses and later Jesus, Freud and Einstein all to be made irrelevant in Church doctrine for their own self-aggrandizement.
Islam evolved a different tactic by claiming that the Jewish patriarchs and prophets (including Jesus) were actually Muslim, thereby inventing a history when there was none, in order to validate their claims to be the last and only correct religion for all mankind. They declared that all non-Muslims were "infidels" who needed to be converted to Islam by the sword.
The story of "The Confessor" revolves around documentary evidence of the Vatican’s role in aiding Hitler’s "Final Solution for the Jewish People". The goal (in the story) was to bury both the evidence and those who gathered it. While the novel is, of course, a fictionalized version of the attitude of Church fathers, the events surrounding this doctrine are quite real.
It is now November 2007 and there is to be a gathering of the nations at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland - under the rubric of initiating "Peace" between the Jews of Israel and the Arab Muslims of the World. In reality, there is no objective of "Peace" but, merely to assemble the hostile forces necessary to first weaken the Jewish State by cutting off pieces of her, to be followed by her elimination, denials notwithstanding. Regretfully, between blackmail, bribery and other threats to withhold aid, arms and technology, un-Jews like Olmert, Peres, Livni, and Barak have been recruited to assist in Israel’s dismemberment.
Those nations to-be-invited, have in their time, all killed their Jews or, at least, made every effort to eliminate their presence. Now, for a myriad of reasons, they, the nations under the guidance of the U.S. State Department who represent much of the Vatican’s thinking, are assembling to fulfill what would be Hitler’s fondest wish. The rolling back of the U.N. Partition vote is to be "larded over" with the language of diplomacy and expression of a false concern for Jews.
I feel quite certain the Vatican and the Muslims have joined forces on the one subject with which they can agree. King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia just met and shook hands with the German Pope, Benedict XVI. (4) The King actually gifted the Pope a sword, a Muslim scimitar - which the Pope accepted. Imagine if you will, the two main representatives of their faiths, King Abdullah for Islam and the Pope for Catholic Christianity, both at war with each other for centuries, now smiling and discussing the fate of the Jews and the Jewish State of Israel in a common cause as allies.
While neither Muslim nor Christian would allow the other true freedom of worship in their spheres of influence - especially if one or the other had control over Jerusalem, they did agree together to deny the Jews sovereignty over the Land of Israel and Jerusalem. G-d’s gift to the Jewish people in perpetuity is to be declared a mistake by the nations at Annapolis and thus "null and void". Who gave them that right?
Some will recall a speech in Regensburg, given by this Pope Benedict XVI, wherein he quoted a 14th Century Byzantine emperor who called Islam "evil and inhuman". Islamists went ballistic, although they are proud of their history of cruelty and hostility to all other religions. Benedict later apologized, mindful of Catholic practitioners and Church-owned properties which could fall into Muslim Arab hands upon the completion of the betrayal by Olmert and Rice in dividing Jerusalem and other Israeli Land.
But, here were two mortal enemies, smiling, shaking hands (gifting and accepting a sword) and discussing the future of the world under their reigns. The "future", theoretically - depends upon who will rule Jerusalem in some seemingly equal fashion while each thinks about how to cheat and defeat the other - after they rid themselves of the Jews’ sovereignty over their country and their Eternal Capital.
But first, Annapolis has to be attended to.
###
1. "The Confessor" by Daniel Silva Signet Books/Penguin Books/GP Putnam NY 2004
2. "The Assassins" by Oliver North Avon Books from Harper Collins NY 2005
3. "The Unholy Trinity: the Vatican, the Nazis and Soviet Intelligence" by John Loftus & Mark Aarons St. Martin’s Press NY 1991
4. "Pope Benedict Meets Saudi King at Vatican" by Elisabeth Rosenthal New York Times November 7, 2007
_________
Antisionist: 
Chamish highly recommends this book and says it is among the best for looking at the agreement between the Nazis and the Labour Zionists in terms of getting Jews out of Germany and into Palestine. Black goes into detail about how many Labour Zionists were hip to the fact that many Jews did not want to go to Palestine instead of Germany but rather other European countries that were less hostile. But the Labour Zionists would have none of it. Go to Palestine and help us make a new nation or else you go back and starve to death in the camps. Chamish has gone so far as to say that Labour Zionist Jews are the worst thing to have happened to the Jewish people in the last few years.
There was no holocaust of six million Jews and there were no gas chambers. Revisionists such as Germar Rudolf and Ernst Zundel have exposed this. They are both in prison. Using the holocaust as a billy club against other nations have been convenient not only for the Zionists but also the Vatican since by proxy, they can get a hold of Jerusalem.
No comments:
Post a Comment