Greg Syzmanski on Ron Paul

From http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/27-Dec-2007.html

Like Hillary, Giuliani And All Prez Candidates, Ron Paul Is Just Another Vatican-Jesuit NWO Shill, Making Good Political Theatre The whole Congress, Senate and all political Fed presidential choices are on the Vatican-led NWO team, leaving America with fascism covered over by a fantasy called democracy. By Greg Szymanski Dec. 27, 2007 The Ron Paul theatrical masquerade has been sweeping across the country like an out of control Jesuit freight train. And the secret engineer of the whole deceptive political show, Jesuit Gen. Fr. Peter Hans Kolvenbach, is probably having a big laugh from his plush headquarters at Borgo Santo Spirito 5 in Rome, saying: "Control the Left. Control the Right. And in the end the whole bloody country is ours for the taking. Remember, the ends justify the means and good ole Ronnie plays a good game just like all of the Pope's candidates such as Hillary, Obama and Giuliani, to name a few. "I might add we control the whole government so what's the difference. If you don't believe me,  when is the last time anybody in Washington said anything bad about us Jesuits and our spokesman Ratzinger?" Although most Americans havefallen for Ron Paul's patriot cover, people are starting to catch on as even the Black Pope knows "you can't fool all the people all of the time." "But you can figure out a way first marginalize them and then control them," added Kolvenbach under his breath while counting his gold coins from his balcony overlooking St. Peter's Square, also totally under his evil control. Two examples of of Americans who have done an about face concerning Ron Paul are Tom Freiss, a amateur radio operator spreading the truth about the Vatican, and Rick Freidrich, an ardent Paul supporter until recently. "I used to believe in Ron Paul, but after reading his statements on the floor of the House, paying homage to Pope John Paul II and calling him a man of peace, I realized he was just another New World Order puppet controlled by the Vatican like all the rest of the candidates," said Freiss recently on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal. "They love to control all sides of every war they start and they love to control all sides of the political spectrum, making it appear the people have a choice but in reality there is none. Another reason for putting Paul in the mix is to use the election only as a poll to better judge where Americans stand on important issues." Friedrich, a one time outspoken Paul supporter, presented a more detailed analysis explaining why he jumped off the Ron Paul bandwagon: Some of the way you guys present your info with weak evidence, he said she said, and cartoonish devils has only turned me off from taking you all that seriously. Please consider only using solid arguments and mature presentations. Anyway, you posted what I wrote about Jones in September, but I was not sure why you opposed Ron Paul. I became a big supporter of Ron Paul as you can read all my blogs on the dailypaul.com forum. However, after the Glen Beck show I was very curious to see what you would write about it. Then I saw your page about Ron Paul. The hand stuff seemed to be a weak argument but the video where he said homosexuality is not a sin shocked me, just as much as the links to what he wrote about Pope John Paul being a man of God (actually you don't have that one linked but another one like it). http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul244.html I have issued the below retraction to everyone I have promoted Ron Paul to. Sincerely, Rick Dear friends, Please allow me to apologize for my diverting the focus of the energy research towards a political candidate. This sort of thing only opens the door up to going off topic. I recently wrote an announcement and included a short support reference to Ron Paul and then immediately deleted it and resent it without the reference because I realized it was not fitting. Some time previous to this I posted a fuller endorsement which I did not remove yet. We are in desperate times and are all looking for people we can trust. When someone appears to offer an answer we are naturally excited and motivated. I have watched Ron Paul for some 6 years and was excited about him running for President. I even wrote several articles and posted them on my website which I will remove shortly: http://rpmgt.org/RonPaul.htm I was sincere in my research of this person but I did miss some things until last week. Some of the things I found may not concern some of you so I will not mention them unless you ask off the lists. However, I will post some other matters below that have also completely convinced me of my error. Since I did present a positive endorsement of this candidate I feel the need to share why I feel I was mistaken. I do not endorse anyone else and trust now that I will have more time to once again participate in these energy discussions (after the new year). Sincerely, Rick Ron Paul and John Paul. A few more reasons why I was mistaken. [supporting links and articles below] Ron Paul has recently stated publicly that he opposes a new world order and globalism as well as the Bilderberger groups ideas. He said in the recent YouTube Presidential debate that people behind such groups have a conspiracy of ideas. http://www.usadaily.com/article.cfm?articleID=181930 On the other hand he is open to making America trade with all nations such as China, Iran, North Korea and Cuba. More importantly Ron Paul praises world leaders such as Pope John Paul II who attended a Bilderberger meeting with Clinton, supported the formation of a European Union, and who called for a New World Order. He called him "one of the great religious leaders of modern times, and an eloquent champion of human freedom and dignity." "The Popes commitment to human dignity" was "grounded in the teachings of Christ" which Ron Paul also supposed led him to oppose the death penalty. At the end of his first speech on the subject before the House of Representatives, after the Popes death, he concluded that he was "pleased to pay tribute to Pope John Paul II. I would encourage those who wish to honor his memory to reflect on his teachings regarding war and the sanctity of life"... While these comments focus on a few issues, it is hard to overlook the sexual scandals that have rocked the church pertaining to the sanctity of life under the Popes leadership (among other serious disregards of the sanctity of life). In the second speech Ron Paul praises the Pope for being a man of God and peace and rebukes politicians for not honoring him in such a way during his life, and for "support [of] policies that are totally at odds with Catholic teachings." He further rebukes them of hypocrisy for having "very short memories." We would ask that same question to the aged doctor with his opposition to the New World Order and the formation of a North American Union if he has either changed his mind or has a "very short memory"? He further rebuked the members of Congress while saying "that the Popes pronouncements were theological, not political." Yet it would be very hard to understand how the actions and words of the leader of the Vatican were not political. Some people who oppose the Globalist neoconservative agenda, as Ron Paul has been well known for, are troubled by the fact that he coauthored a book in 1993 with Lewis E. Lehrman who is a neoconservative and one of the directors of The Project for a New American Century. That very well may be accidental but the late Popes actions in promoting the United Nations as well as a new world order were very obvious to everyone. Further, the Pope made great efforts to make all world religions into one, contradicting the obvious fundamental differences they all have in reference to origins, meaning, morality and destiny. While Ron Paul now says he does not support the conspiracy theories of Alex Jones, he has appeared on his show numerous times over the years in a way which gave most people the opposite impression. This has prompted critics like Glen Beck to ask Ron Paul directly what his views about government involvement with 911 terrorism are. Paul responded to the surprise of many conspiracy theorists that such theories were absurd and preposterous while advocating that it all came down to a bad foreign policy and leadership incompetence. What was most surprising with the outcome from Pauls belittling statements against what Alex Jones holds as obvious fact was not just that Ron Paul claimed to never even hear some of the well known theories Glen Beck had addressed, but that Alex Jones continued his support and respect for Ron Paul in the same way as if the interview never happened. Alex Jones has been an outspoken and harsh critic of those who disbelieve his theories. His continued support of Ron Paul contradicts many years of criticizing of others who made the exact same statements as Ron Paul has just made. Further, while Jones has avoided almost all discussion about the Roman Catholic Church and the NWO he did produce an article opposing the Pope a few years ago when he pushed for the NWO http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/pope_bush_proposed_chaplain_nwo.htm To be consistent, if it were anyone else, Jones would have dismissed Ron Paul as endorsing the NWO for his comments about the late Pope (as well as for they way he dismissed Jones theories).. The Alex Jones media machine has been a major contributor to the Ron Paul campaign. Most of Jones listeners support Ron Paul. The question we have after the Beck interview and the praising statements about Pope John Paul, is why? The two are mutually exclusive. Alex Jones doctrine and practice has called Ron Pauls views as stated deceitful and cowardly for someone in his position. But he will not act consistently. Instead, he went on the attack against Glen Beck for asking the questions Americans wanted to know about Ron Paul. Even Jones sidekicks the Watson brothers, who run his websites and write articles for him, thought the interview went very well. But Jones said on his show that he disagreed with these brothers. Very revealing indeed! Jones has further stated on radio that he was significantly influential in getting Ron Paul to run for President and also that his camp coined the term or started the recent Ron Paul Revolution. During the same period where Paul was distancing himself from 911 conspiracy theories Jones published totally unsupported claims about NWO assassination plans for Ron Paul: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2007/121407_assassinating_p aul.htm This was a major subject on the dailyPaul.com forums for the next week even though there was much action to stop all discussion about it. Im sure this will bring many things to peoples minds... The Watson and Jones team have continually used these kinds of sensational claims in the past. Notice the strength of the argument in the following statement: "Estulin, whose information has unfortunately proven very accurate in the past, went public with the bombshell news [about a Ron Paul assassination plot] during an appearance on The Alex Jones Show today." Jones always draws a lot of attention to his industry whenever such prophetically false claims are made to scare his audience. Typical with all cult groups the prophesy is given with some disclaimer and hope that it will not happen, but the natural impression is given to all followers that it will definitely happen. When it doesn't happen and the hype is long gone, the disclaimer is then used to justify the sensational prophesy. Jones has done this repeatedly, and actually daily to a lesser extent. He is bound to be right one time out of a hundred. But just last year in the summer he gave a very solemn warning that the end was really coming this time. War was about to start up like we have never seen it, within a month. This was special and equal only to his prediction about 9/11 (which he falsely claimed he was the first to warn about). The disclaimer clause in this case was that his listeners could make a difference by activism. Nevertheless the terror continued to scare everyone in the same way that so many cult leaders have scared their sheep. Lest you think Ron Paul is way above these kinds of things, the fact is that he has continually appeared on the Alex Jones show over the years and has spoken sympathetically with Jones as he made numerous sensational claims. Late this summer, just before the Ron Paul Revolution really took off, Ron Paul made the following statement on the show: "If I were a betting man I would bet that they will attack Iran before the end of this administration, which means in the next year or so. The plans have been laid just like the plans were laid to go into Iraq a long time before they did but they had to wait for the right opportunity." This fit in perfectly with all the hype Jones was engaged in for the last 3 or 4 years about Iran. First it was April 2005, then Fall of that year. Then Fall 2006. Now we have about a year to go. But now things have changed with Iran. The scare tactics will continue. Both these men criticize the government for scaring the people into following them, but they are on record for doing the same. Every time Alex Jones produces a new scary terrorism video of the nature of a Osamah video, which many times features Ron Paul, it successfully draws in more support for this scare media industrial complex. Alex Jones always asks the fitting question on his show (or at least he used to), Who stands to gain? It should be evident by now. Are these predictions and associations and endorsements a sign of hypocrisy and poor judgment or something merely accidental that is not worthy of our attention? Hope and fear for America may be a little more accurate. We hear that Holywood went on strike but it appears the entertainment has just moved to the Internet. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul242.html Before the US House of Representatives, April 6, 2005. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to join my colleagues in paying tribute to the life and legacy of Pope John Paul II. Pope John Paul II was one of the great religious leaders of modern times, and an eloquent champion of human freedom and dignity. Unlike all-too-many misguided religious leaders, the Pope understood that liberty, both personal and economic, is a necessary condition for the flourishing of human virtue. The Popes commitment to human dignity, grounded in the teachings of Christ, led him to become one of the most eloquent spokesmen for the consistent ethic of life, exemplified by his struggles against abortion, war, euthanasia, and the death penalty. Unfortunately, few in American politics today adhere to the consistent ethic of life, thus we see some who cheered the Popes stand against the war and the death penalty while downplaying or even openly defying his teachings against abortion and euthanasia. .... In conclusion, I am pleased to pay tribute to Pope John Paul II. I would encourage those who wish to honor his memory to reflect on his teachings regarding war and the sanctity of life, http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul244.html Im happy to witness so many politicians honoring a great man of God and peace. The problem, however, is that so few of them honored him during his lifetime by their actions as legislators. In fact, most members of Congress support policies that are totally at odds with Catholic teachings. The hypocritical pro-war conservatives lauding him today have very short memories. Both conservatives and liberals cannot understand that the Popes pronouncements were theological, not political. He was a man of God, not a man of the state. He was not a policy maker, but rather a steward of long-established Catholic doctrine. His mission was to save souls, not serve the political agendas of any nation, party, or politician. The Popes commitment to human dignity, grounded in the teachings of Christ, led him to become an eloquent and consistent advocate for an ethic of life, exemplified by his struggles against abortion, war, euthanasia, and the death penalty. But no politician will ever produce even a tiny fraction of the legacy left by Pope John Paul II. .... http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/01/01/pope.ny.ap/ Pope calls for a new world order VATICAN CITY (AP) -- Pope John Paul II rang in the New Year on Thursday with a renewed call for peace in the Middle East and Africa and the creation of a new world order based on respect for the dignity of man and equality among nations. John Paul presided over a morning Mass inside St. Peter's Basilica to mark the World Day of Peace, which the Roman Catholic Church celebrates every January 1. He appeared in good form, delivering his entire homily in a strong and clear voice despite a relatively tiring holiday schedule. This year, John Paul directed his thoughts to continuing conflicts around the globe. But he stressed that to bring about peace, there needs to be a new respect for international law and the creation of a "new international order" based on the goals of the United Nations. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17083 Clinton, pope join Bilderbergers Secret meeting of global movers, shakers in Portugal What do Steven Spielberg, Pope John Paul II, Ted Turner, Boris Yeltsin, Bill Clinton and House Speaker Dennis Hastert have in common? They are among those on a "partial guest list" of expected attendees to the 1999 Bilderberg meeting in Portugal scheduled for next week. http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/pope_bush_proposed_chaplain About Me Timothy I'm a young adult learning new information and finding the truth. Over the years, I'm becoming more meek. I will still defend my beliefs though when it is necessary. I am 36 years old now. I like living in Hampton Roads. Hampton Roads is apart of Southeastern Virginia and Northeastern North Carolina. I live in the 7 city group of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Chesapeake, Newport News, Hampton, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach. Yorktown, Williamsburg, Glocuster, Cape Charles, Elizabeth City, Currituck, Sussex, and Poquoson are apart of Hampton Roads as well. So, I don't forget those important places as well. I enjoy looking at religious information, conspiracy fact information, and politics. Additionally, History is a subject that I delve into. If you have any comments and questions, you can email me at truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com. I'm usually very apt to respond to emails easily. This is a non-censorship blog so your comments will never be censored here. View my complete profile Powered by Blogger.