Pro-God, Pro-Human Life, anti-New World Order, Anti-Nefarious Secret Societies, Pro-Civil Liberties, anti-Torture, anti-National ID Card, Pro-Family, Anti-Neo Conservativism, Pro-Net Neutrality, Pro-Home Schooling, Anti-Voting Fraud, Pro-Good Israelis & Pro-Good Palestinians, Anti-Human Trafficking, Pro-Health Freedom, Anti-Codex Alimentarius, Pro-Action, Anti-Bigotry, Pro-9/11 Justice, Anti-Genocide, and Pro-Gun Control. My name is Timothy and I'm from the state of Virginia.
Haven't watched your vid's yet; and answer is probably in there; so sorry to ask without watching; but is this 'Timothy Truthseekers' rant to the truth movement; or someone else's that you are just posting.
Anyway, I'll see how much adsl i got left for the month and if I can fit it in to watch.
And if yours personally -- well then I will even get extra adsl to watch!! But not for anyone else! ;-)
I ask, cause lots of people seem to have very different interpretations, and some of them are very, very different.
For example 'New Age' for me, can be anyone whether they call themselves 'libertarian' or 'progressive' or whatever their predominant 'labels' are; a 'new age libertarian' will be -- for me -- someone who intellectually values whatever they profess to be 'libertarian' values, but in their actions, don't.
Accordingly -- for me -- a 'New Ager' is someone whose particular alleged 'values' or 'priorities' are simply intellectual, in thier heads' and not in their hearts, and they are not committed to those values.
For example; -- in my opinion -- at least 92% of the mothers and fathers on the planet, are 'New Age Fathers'; because if you ask any one of them; their 'children' are 'very important' to them; but when you take a look at thier lives; and how they treat their children; then you can see they are decieving themselves about their father or motherhood values.
Another example: I often ask Black Africans, why they have so many children, when they don't seem to be able to afford them. They say it is their culture, to love children. When I ask them to please explain to me, how it is 'loving' to give birth to a child in a concentration camp, abuse the child with neglect and violence; they say I don't understand. I ask them to please help me to understand; are they saying that to neglect and violently abuse your child, is LOVE? Are they saying that is how they show 'LOVE'. They are then infuriated with me; I am a racist. I say, 'No I am just trying to understand'; you say African black culture loves children, which is why you have so many children; but please can you show me what actions you mean by 'LOVE'?
So, in terms of 'loving mothers and fathers'; I would consider them 'NEW AGERS' because they don't practice what they preach.
So, that's one version of my definition of 'NEW AGERS'; I'd be curious to hear yours.
And for me a 'Patriot' would be the opposite of a 'New Ager'; it would be someone whose stuck to their values, who practiced what they preached; and generally people who practice what they preach, are people who are much more constitutionally minded.
Bit of a 'bet', wouldn't you say? Makes the WSOP look like a tupperware teaparty! WOW...
Me, I'd be happy in a little log cabin, and you! ;-). As someone I really admire allot says: THINK ABOUT IT! ;-) (I think you should very seriously consider that offer!
Anyway, hows this for a 'bet':
Investors are concerned about a $37-billion bet that Buffett made last year that US and world equity values would be higher in 15 to 20 years than they were then, when the Dow Jones Industrials were trading around 13,000. Through his firm, Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett sold option contracts, known as "naked puts" to an undisclosed group of investors for around $4.85 billion, reportedly using Goldman as broker.
Because of its solid-gold credit rating, Berkshire Hathaway was not required to put up collateral to make this trade. But now rumors are flying on Wall Street that the owners of the contracts have demanded that broker Goldman Sachs put up collateral for the rest of the amount due. Since the value of the trade could be infinite, the collateral demands are said to be large, and fears that Goldman will struggle to make good on its obligation has panicked shareholders.
Indeed one theory making the rounds this week is that Buffett put $5 billion into Goldman at around $125 per share in September not as an investment but to help provide funds for the collateral.
Isn’t this the oracle that called derivatives, ‘financial weapons of mass destruction’?
Something is very wrong. And those that insist that the fear of financial crisis ended in October are very, very wrong.
How long before the default, do you think?
You know I don't mind if people want to call this 'economics' 'sanity'; I mean, if that makes them happy, then OKAY. But what I don't understand is how is it decided that some kind of extremely strange behaviour by one group of people; that others would not participate in if you put a gun to their heads is 'SANE', and another type of behaviour others wouldn't is 'INSANE'?
Please explain the common sense to me, cause I understand it about as much as I understand how Africans can say neglecting their children, with violence and abuse is 'LOVE'.
Maybe I am just very stupid. Do you want to share a logcabin with a stupid lady.. I am not stupid in everything! ;-)
Hey Timothy,
ReplyDeleteHaven't watched your vid's yet; and answer is probably in there; so sorry to ask without watching; but is this 'Timothy Truthseekers' rant to the truth movement; or someone else's that you are just posting.
Anyway, I'll see how much adsl i got left for the month and if I can fit it in to watch.
And if yours personally -- well then I will even get extra adsl to watch!! But not for anyone else! ;-)
So please let me know if you don't mind. Thanks
Lara
No, these are someone else's videos.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your response and letting me know.
ReplyDeleteDo you personally recommend them, you didn't add a 'note by me'; or you just sharing them for disclosure purposes.
I value your opinion, allot.
Lara
I show them for disclosure purposes about many New Age types trying to infiltrate the Patriot Movement.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you mean by 'New Age' types?
ReplyDeleteAnd what do you mean by 'Patriot'?
I ask, cause lots of people seem to have very different interpretations, and some of them are very, very different.
For example 'New Age' for me, can be anyone whether they call themselves 'libertarian' or 'progressive' or whatever their predominant 'labels' are; a 'new age libertarian' will be -- for me -- someone who intellectually values whatever they profess to be 'libertarian' values, but in their actions, don't.
Accordingly -- for me -- a 'New Ager' is someone whose particular alleged 'values' or 'priorities' are simply intellectual, in thier heads' and not in their hearts, and they are not committed to those values.
For example; -- in my opinion -- at least 92% of the mothers and fathers on the planet, are 'New Age Fathers'; because if you ask any one of them; their 'children' are 'very important' to them; but when you take a look at thier lives; and how they treat their children; then you can see they are decieving themselves about their father or motherhood values.
Another example: I often ask Black Africans, why they have so many children, when they don't seem to be able to afford them. They say it is their culture, to love children. When I ask them to please explain to me, how it is 'loving' to give birth to a child in a concentration camp, abuse the child with neglect and violence; they say I don't understand. I ask them to please help me to understand; are they saying that to neglect and violently abuse your child, is LOVE? Are they saying that is how they show 'LOVE'. They are then infuriated with me; I am a racist. I say, 'No I am just trying to understand'; you say African black culture loves children, which is why you have so many children; but please can you show me what actions you mean by 'LOVE'?
So, in terms of 'loving mothers and fathers'; I would consider them 'NEW AGERS' because they don't practice what they preach.
So, that's one version of my definition of 'NEW AGERS'; I'd be curious to hear yours.
And for me a 'Patriot' would be the opposite of a 'New Ager'; it would be someone whose stuck to their values, who practiced what they preached; and generally people who practice what they preach, are people who are much more constitutionally minded.
Lara
Bit of a 'bet', wouldn't you say? Makes the WSOP look like a tupperware teaparty! WOW...
ReplyDeleteMe, I'd be happy in a little log cabin, and you! ;-). As someone I really admire allot says: THINK ABOUT IT! ;-) (I think you should very seriously consider that offer!
Anyway, hows this for a 'bet':
Investors are concerned about a $37-billion bet that Buffett made last year that US and world equity values would be higher in 15 to 20 years than they were then, when the Dow Jones Industrials were trading around 13,000. Through his firm, Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett sold option contracts, known as "naked puts" to an undisclosed group of investors for around $4.85 billion, reportedly using Goldman as broker.
Because of its solid-gold credit rating, Berkshire Hathaway was not required to put up collateral to make this trade. But now rumors are flying on Wall Street that the owners of the contracts have demanded that broker Goldman Sachs put up collateral for the rest of the amount due. Since the value of the trade could be infinite, the collateral demands are said to be large, and fears that Goldman will struggle to make good on its obligation has panicked shareholders.
Indeed one theory making the rounds this week is that Buffett put $5 billion into Goldman at around $125 per share in September not as an investment but to help provide funds for the collateral.
Isn’t this the oracle that called derivatives, ‘financial weapons of mass destruction’?
Bob (A Climate of Corruption, Bailouts, Currency Rigging and Unfair Competition) continues with:
Something is very wrong. And those that insist that the fear of financial crisis ended in October are very, very wrong.
How long before the default, do you think?
You know I don't mind if people want to call this 'economics' 'sanity'; I mean, if that makes them happy, then OKAY. But what I don't understand is how is it decided that some kind of extremely strange behaviour by one group of people; that others would not participate in if you put a gun to their heads is 'SANE', and another type of behaviour others wouldn't is 'INSANE'?
Please explain the common sense to me, cause I understand it about as much as I understand how Africans can say neglecting their children, with violence and abuse is 'LOVE'.
Maybe I am just very stupid. Do you want to share a logcabin with a stupid lady.. I am not stupid in everything! ;-)
Lara