Barack Obama yesterday gave a speech to Congress. Michelle Obama was there in the audience. She set next to numerous guests. One was the pilot Sully Sullenburger (who managed to save all his passengers when his plane crashed in the cold Hudson river). Leonars Abess was there being a Miami banker who gave his 60 million dollar bonus to employees. A young girl from South Carolina who asked for the President's help because her school was in such a bad state of repair also was in the audience. The girl's name is Ty’Sheoma Bethea. She resides in the School of Dillon, South Carolina. Her school is a place where ceiling leak and the paint peels off the walls. She said that she won't quit, which is true. No human being should quit in life despite how hardcore our circumstances in life are. His speech mostly described about the economic turmoil in America. He said that we will be a better nation economically than before. He assured people that his economic plan is a legitimate solution to the crisis we have. Barack Obama advocated millions of dollars to help those suffering from mortgages and his $787-billion stimulus law. Barack Obama was told by Bill Clinton and other to inspire more confidence because dire rhetoric might not make his argument more appealing to citizens. There has been plenty of legitimate criticism against Barack Obama's new stimulus law. One bad part of this law is that it forces states to pull strings in order to accept the money (i.e. the stimulus plan will require their states to raise business taxes if they accept this new free money.). Obama feels that government can only solve this problem when in many instances, government complicates matters making them worse. The stimulus plan calls for Obama "change" by giving government control over access to medical treatments plus surveillance over online medical records for every American. Giving bureaucrats the power to decide which procedures have "clinical effectiveness" and may be used as means to nationalizing the health care industry and rationing medical care. The stimulus won't create free and fair trade either. Over spending can devalue the dollar currency, because of the increasing of interest rates. That can cause more debt to be placed upon the pockets of the American taxpayers. One good part of the law is the tax cuts given unto millions of Americans. Yet, the bigger picture is that Barack Obama is an articulate puppet of the new world order. Obama is for the Patriot Act, for the war in Afghanistan, for abortion, and for the goal of globalism basically. So, I'm not blind about what Barack Obama really wants for America.
Harold Gray from JustGetThere on February 23, 2009 wrote about the Real ID Act. Gray outlined that another bill seeks to withhold highway funds to states who don't comply with Real ID. That's sick and extortion of course. The Real ID Act was signed by former President George W. Bush in 2005. The Real ID Act creates a nationwide database interlinked with every DMV across the country. If it's fully implemented, you can't go into any federal building, airport, open a bank account, or any other action that is federal regulated without the Real ID Act on you. It's Big Brother at its finest. The bill of the Real ID Act was passed in a questionable manner when it was secretly tacked on to a must-pass appropriations bill funding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Without any congressional debate, the passage of this bill created massive public backlash which lead to several internet campaigns seeking to repeal the act. Now, 21 states oppose the Real ID Act. The federal mandate wants to require states to spend billions collectively, in order to fulfill all the requirements. The state's great opposition have forced the government to push their plans to 2010. The states opposing the evil Real ID Act is a good thing. A new Real ID amendment, called H.R. 140, has been introduced by Elton Gallegly from California. It wants to withheld funds to states that won't support the Real ID Act. Increasing legislative actions by federal government to exert control over states has kick started a fast growing movement of states claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment. Well over 21 states have introduced legislation asserting their sovereignty, just recently Minnesota and Texas followed suit. The Real ID Act is wrong since it makes up a federal government database, it violates our privacy, and it strips state's power in handling driver licenses in general. The Real ID Act is anti-Constitution completely. The good news is that tons of Americans are realizing what the Real ID Act is truly all about. The truth will prevail in the end in the final analysis.
Daniel Taylor from Old-Thinker News on February 23, 2009 wrote about the global crisis and the new world order. He wrote of the technological revolution being used to shape humanity. One of the bigger pictures is about that the technological Revolution is dealing with nanotechnology, biotechnology, information science, and cognitive science (NBIC) are merging. This may be the largest technological leap in human history. The catch is that this agenda is apart of the elite's goals of transhumanism. Transhumanism is about the biological mechanic mergining of humans with machines in order to make man into a godlike being basically. That is what it comes down to. This is one of the secret plans of the elite's long term goals not just population control. Some want the human brain to merge with computer circuity. Brain-machine interfaces; cloning; genetic engineering of food, plants, and animals; artificial intelligence; nanomaterials; these all stem from the NBIC convergence. Even New Songo, South Korea is a new city with RFID chips, automatic traffic, surveillance, and e-government. This is similar to the Minority report movie. There is also brain-machine interfaces proposals. Fred C. Ikle, who is the former undersecretary of defense for policy under the Reagan administration, (and author of The Ultimate Threat to Nations: Annihilation from Within,) is anticipating the development of advanced brain-machine interfaces. He believes that this can form super advanced think tanks. The transhumanist movement is rapidly growing. The June 2002 conference called, "Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance" discussed the NBIC Revolution. NBIC stands for nanotechnology, biotetchnology, information science, and cognitive science. This conference was organized by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Commerce. Even the RAND corporation discussed about these issues. Futuristics wanted this goal. Certain new inventions are created to rapidly institute global goverance or global government. This has been promoted by the Club of Rome. William E. Halal, wants old dogmas to be gone, so this new futuristic/transhumanist reality is made for the 21st century. The world is in economic turmoil. Some folks are using America's decline as an excuse to reorder the Earth into a new world order (and advancing technologies are exploited to alter society).
Life news still goes forth. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on February 23, 2009 described about how a researcher believes that the abortion/breast cancer link is real. This researcher believes that pregnancy can reduce the risk of breast cancer. Baruch College professor and renowed researcher Joel Brind, Ph.D. is one of the world's leading experts on the link between abortion and breast cancer. He believes that the abortion/breast cancer link is very real. Brind said that studies back up his assertion that carrying a pregnancy to term reduces the risk of breast cancer. The Baruch College student newspaper named The Ticker interviewed Bind. He explained about how having an abortion can lead to a higher risk of contracting the disease. "That’s what the big research argument is about: does abortion increase the risk of breast cancer beyond not getting pregnant in the first place? And the answer is yes," Brind says. Brind said that the reason for the link is obvious for a specific reason. The reason is that "once a woman gets pregnant, her breasts start growing within days or a week or so after getting pregnant. So the number of those Type 1 and Type 2 lobules where breast cancer can form are multiplying and so there are more places where cancer can start as the pregnancy proceeds." "Well, once 32 weeks pass, all those Type 1 and Type 2 lobules become Type 3 and Type 4 lobules so you actually have fewer places for cancer to form than before the pregnancy started. But if a pregnancy is aborted before the 32-week mark, the risk for breast cancer goes way up from where it would have been even if a woman hadn't gotten pregnant in the first place," he said. "No one argues with the fact that when a woman has a full-term pregnancy, breast cancer risk goes down," he told the Thinker newspaper. Brind said that pro-abortion bias is the reason that his research has been criticized. He said that there needs to be more accurate medical data about women who had abortions to make it easier to draw accurate conclusions. And, in those cases, the conclusion is clear. He said that in 2003, a scientific worshop of 100 invited scientists (from across the world) were trying to promote that no link exists among abortion and breast cancer. Yet, Brind had done incredible research to prove the opposite. http://www.bcpinstitute.org/ is the link with more research in this arena. Therefore, Brind is a credible source of information exposing abortion/breast cancer. Abortion has been dangerous side effects upon women. That is one of the reasons why I will be forever Pro-Life.
Mary Ann Roser from the Austin-American Statesman on Monday at February 23, 2009 exposed about how Texans unkowingly donated children's blood to research. For nearly 7 years, the state of Texas has been indefinitely storing blood from nearly all newborns in Texas without their parents' consent for possible use in medical research. The blood is collected as part of a 44 year old state-mandated newborn screening program in which hospitals, birthing centers and midwives draw blood from a baby's heel (parental consent isn’t required for that, either — so the state can test for a host of birth defects). Some believe that either the state discarded the blood after six months or more recently, stored it for three years before destroying it. But starting in 2002, the state health department began collecting and keeping blood indefinitely for current or future medical research. This practice has been the subject of a legal challenge in Minnesota. Five dots of blood are collected on paper for the screening and then stored. The health department's policy have samples being used by the medical community for things like cancer research, etc. (according to Doug McBride, who is the spokesman for the Department of State Health Services). The law doesn't require parents to be told how the blood might be used. Yet, if parents are aware of the blood draws, Texas law lets them opt out only for religious reasons. Parental consent isn't obtained, which I don't agree with. McBride said that the policy exist since of the costs are heavily for other means of research. McBride wants screening, but it's wrong to violate privacy and parental rights to the sake of blood research. Since 1965, Texas law has required the screening of newborns for birth defects. "Even if something is a social good, there can be a social harm," said Dr. Howard Brody, director of the Institute for the Medical Humanities at the UT Medical Branch at Galveston. "It's important to have trust in the scientific community ... and the more things that are done without consent, the more trust goes down." There should be transparency and privacy in the world. Parents should have consent before a newsborn's blood is retrieved.
There are numerous urban warfare drills that are linked to coming economic rage. The reason is that many in the government are preparing for riots if the economy breaks down even further. Some analysts even predict a "summer of rage" in Europe and America. These people predicting riots and civil unrest globally include Gerald Celente, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair. Others who have spoken the same exact thing include is the head of the WTO, the head of the IMF, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In this month alone about 150 U.S. troops from the U.S. Special Operations Command traveled in the streets of New Orleans in military helicopters. They even dropped bombs in what officials describe as a "training event." An Iowa National Guard training exercise in Arcadia, Iowa, scheduled for April was originally billed as an “invasion” before public opposition caused the drill to be scaled back. The exercise included Guard troops patrolling streets, searching houses and confiscating firearms. No less than 2,200 U.S. Marines were also involved in urban operations training in Richmond, Virginia, throughout January, drills that involved landing troops in populated areas, allowing military pilots to “familiarize themselves with the area.” A witness showed a video where military choppers were flying low near parking lots. This is a sick occurence of the increased militarization of American society. Some believe that these drills are existing to prepare troops for foreign combat zones. Also, they are there to deal with civil unrest if the economic crisis worsens. That is why American forces have observed riots in Iceland, Latvia, and other European nations because of the economic problems in those countries. The U.S. government have contingency plans in these areans indeed. Indeed, before a media exposé forced them into a denial, Northcom revealed that one of the duties of at least 20,000 active duty troops that are being placed inside the United States would be dealing with “civil unrest and crowd control”. Even millions of dollars from the bailout are sent to local police departments (to spend in military tools like drones, armored vehicles, high powered firearms, etc.). HR 645, otherwise known as the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act, would mandate the expansion of FEMA detention camps which would likely to be used to detain illegal immigrants as well as rioting American citizens. The U.S. Army War College in November released a white paper called Known Unknowns: Unconventional ‘Strategic Shocks’ in Defense Strategy Development. This report talked about how the military must be prepared for violence in the United States, which can be provoked by an economic collapse. The Big Brother state may get even more fascistic if this economic crisis continues.
Alan Keyes have said some hardcore and controversial comments about Barack Obama. Some of the things he said was true and other things he commented on were false. Keyes ironically failed to defeat Barack Obama in the Illinois Senate race. Keyes was a 2008 Presidential candiate. He is a plaintiff in one of many lawsuits questinioning Obama's citizenship status (since only American citizens can be elected President of the United States of America). He said these comments in an interview with a report from KHAS-TV at a fundraiser for the AAA Crisis Pregnancy Center in Hastings, Nebraska. He accused Obama of being a radical communist. He said that America will cease to exist if we don't stop him. Obama isn't a Communist, but he is radical on many issues. Keyes called Obama an ursurper because he feels that he isn't legally qualified to be President. Alan Keyes said that Obama on immigration promotes amnesty and his abortion policies are an abomination (which he is right on. You don't force citizens to fund overseas abortions against their will and then call that common ground. It isn't). Even the Born alive abortion ban was opposed by Barack Obama, which is inconcievably extremist (that is about infanticide). Keyes claimed that it's wrong to have a bankrupt government to use money to save a bankrupt banking system. There is a catch with Alan Keyes though. See, Keyes supports the globalist United Nations. He agrees with the war on terror, which is about the imperalist/colonalist rule over the Middle East (including Central Asia with torture, murder, and war crimes). Keyes is allied with neo cons. Therefore, Keyes is right on some issues. Yet, he believes in the left/right paradigm (when Republicans tripled the size of government and promoted torture memos). The bigger issue is that Obama is a puppet of the Trilateralists, Bilderbergers, CFR, etc. Barack Obama's goals have been advanced by the previous administration even. This goal (as supported by Barack Obama) is about supporting evil rendition policies, supporting an accleration of troop deployments in Afghanistan, having unjustified military strikes in Pakistan, and the federalization of our U.S. health care (with bioethical boards and a database stealing our health records nationwide by force. Some believe that this board can ration care for the elderly).
Carroll Quigley is the Georgetown University professor that educated Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton wrote his propaganda book entitled, "My Life." In Chapter 24, he wrote about wanting to create a new economic order for Americans. He also mention that we're all in it together. Bill Cinton would support globalism, because he was a Rhodes Scholar. In his 1992 Presidential nomination speech, Bill Clinton speaks of Carroll Quigley to a crowd of people. Clinton paid homage to him as a mentor. In his "My Life" book Clinton described the lasting impact the Quigley had on him. Carroll was more blatant in the goals of the Anglo-American establishment. He wrote that the Rhodes Scholarship was created in the terms of what Cecil Rhodes wanted. Rhodes had 5 wills. He left his fortune to form his secret society in order to expand the British Empire. In Quigley's Tragedy and Hope book on pg. 324, he writes that the Anglo-American elite want financial power to be centralized into private hands (in order to rule over the political system of the whole world. They want a fedual system of central banks acting in secret agreement. The BIS or the Bank for International Settlements in Basil, Switzerland is a privately-bank that's an elite nexus point). Carroll Quigley knows this since he investigated the Rhodes Scholar groups's papers for 2 years. Bill Clinton is also a member of the Trilateral Commission. David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski created the Trilateral Commission in 1973. Freemason ex-Senator Barry Goldwater admitted in his 1979 No Apologies book that the Trilateralists want to strip national sovereignity to form the new world order. Even David Rockefeller's "Memoirs" on pg. 405 have him admitting that he is apart of a secret cabal (and conspiring with others globally) to form an integrated world (or an one world system). Therefore, this stuff is laid out by the globalists themselves about what they want. We have a right to expose these nefarious goals and agendas.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment