Troy on Dr. Horowitz, etc.

IS MASS INTERNATIONAL GENOCIDE (& OTHER N.W.O. CONSPIRACY "SACRED COW" BELIEFS) ACTUALLY A LONG TERM PSY-OP? THOUGHTS ANYONE? + LEN HOROVITZ'S ASSERTIONS QUESTIONED

Dear Dr Len Horowitz & friends (I am addressing both Dr Horowitz & others in the body of text below, so this should be taken in consideration when reading the following)

I am starting to wonder if a lot of the widely-proposed & believed key "New World Order" conspiracy "must be's" are not actually long term intell-agency generated psychological-operations in themselves? Despite all the evidence that on face value seems to indicate that this agenda will come to pass, it seems far more likely to me that the long term financial & social control goals of the covert controllers are far ore likely to be satiated by their current path of slowly drugging & toxifying people to death, rather than getting rid of the vast majority in the west. Maybe I'm wrong - but perhaps not. I still think that people should avoid these vaccines, & will continue to post warning about such money-making & health debilitating vaccines but I think that we should all start shining the spotlight on conspiracy "sacred cow" beliefs, such as the much-touted near-overnight Global Mass Culling, which may actually aid the real agenda of keeping us all herded & trapped in a fear-based mental/emotional/spiritual prison. It is interesting to me when some people have kneejerk reactions to the questioning of these matters. Perhaps the Georgia Guidestones were even created as part of such a Psy Op? Lots of smaller, drawn out, health debilitating attacks on the common people seem more effective on many levels. Again, I'm open to suggestion here, but hardline defending of a seemingly flawed & increasingly questionable assertion seems necessary at this point in proceedings.

I'm not entirely convinced of Dr Horowitz being free of any covert agenda either, contemplating both his long term high international profile in conspiracy research circles (what radio show - whether controlled or authentic - has Dr Horovitz - who's claims would ostensibly seem to be a great threat to claimed intentions of the Powers That Be - not been on?) & his problematising, question-raising Knights Hospitaller knighthood. Are any Knights Hospitaller derivatives - e.g. Queen Elizabeth II's Knights of St John, the Pope's Knights of Malta (SMOM), truly independent, as claimed? Are those which are "in dispute" truly so at the top? The latter two are most tight & more investigation should be done into the membership of all Knights Hospitaller branches, regardless of the claims of such organisations themselves.

Some of Dr Horowitz's notions that I find most interesting - such as those relating to musical frequency (being a musician myself) - seem hard to independently validate & cast doubt on the accuracy his other info. Studying some of his sites are low in substantiable evidence & thorough, internally logical explanation & bear the dubious hallmarks of chalatanesque deceptiveness (i.e. listing "stars" & putting up "me & them" photo opportunity snaps to promote a musical event that they have only been invited to & are not confirmed as participating at seems like appalling lack of judgement & gratuitous self-promotion at best (see evidence below). Sorry Dr Horovitz, this may sound harsh, but I would apply the same criteria to anyone. It's not the photos themselves that I object to, so much as their application. This is intended to be constructive criticism.

http://web.mac.com/len15/LOVE528/SCHEDULE.html
http://web.mac.com/len15/LOVE528/Pi,_PHI_%26_528.html

Check the lists of "invited performers", why no list of "confirmed performers"? Did this multi-nation event ever take place in June 2009? I'd bet not & wonder how much cash was generated from contributions for this fantasy-fest?

http://web.mac.com/len15/LOVE528/SPONSORS.html

"Royal Bloodline of David" & "Sovereign Orthodox Order of Knights Hospitaller" as sponsors, anyone? Who is this self-proclaimed "Royal Bloodline of David" - the Windsors or European royals - unlikely - or other claimants? No surprise top see Jeff Rense's name there too (& Jordan Maxwell's - isn't he meant to be near bankrupt according to his most vociferous supporters? Is he sponsoring the project with his beer bottle returns or something?)

Dr Horowitz asserts that the frequency of 528 Hertz is the "Love frequency" because it is supposedly the centre of both the audible & visible frequency ranges (light & sound). How is this even possible? "Sound" only becomes visible at the 47th (or is it 48th? 47th I'm pretty sure) octave (i.e. the frequency being doubled around four dozen times, according to comprehensive studies that I have examined in the past, so these are two completely different ranges of frequencies anyway!

So how do we incorporate such a pitch as 528 Hz into a musical tuning & playing context (regardless of its having any special metaphysical properties or not)? If one tunes a guitar's open A string to 444 Hz (rather than the standard 440 Hz), then the note of C - three frets up - produces 528 Hertz. So tuning to 444Hz, not 443 or 445 Hertz or any other produces a note that is pitched at 528 Hertz (albeit actually slightly higher at 520.008 Hz - of course if we tuned to just under 444Hz at 443.993 Hertz

Using the tools at http://shakahara.com/pianopitch2.php we find that:

relative to a pitch of hz for pitch number 49 on the keyboard (A49, whose standard pitch would be 440 hz)
pitch 49 is 444.000
pitch 52 is 528.008

relative to a pitch of hz for pitch number 49 on the keyboard (A49, whose standard pitch would be 440 hz)
pitch 46 is 443.993
pitch 49 is 528.000

So tuning to 444 Hertz (or just under at 443.993 Hertz - if you could find a non-computer based tuner capable of doing such offsets, which you can't, but is so slight as to be irrelevant anyway, considering how easily most non-synthetic instruments go out of tune), we can start to experiment with Dr Horovitz's "love frequency" with the knowledge of the precise equivalent tone - which appears to be closest to what is conventionally considered to be the note of C within the octave above 440 Hz. Close scrutiny of Dr Horowitz's "528" related site digs up no substantial evidence as to the special value of his toted 528 frequency. I don't want to "demonise" the theory (if it can be called a theory), but the only thing special that I can find about 528Hz is that it requires tuning to 444 Hz & 444 is 2/3 of 666 - which Dr Horovitz argues is not "evil" or "negative" in itself - again with no explanation as to what leads him to this conclusion - whether he is right or wrong! Len, I'm all ears (no pun intended), but please explain yourself. I even studied this page & have to conclude that the evidence is almost bizarre in its absence: http://web.mac.com/len15/LOVE528/Technology.html

Dr Horowitz maintains that the Rockefellers funded a move to set 440 Hz as standard musical tuning reference pitch - but provides no evidence. I can see that there is a logic that a number that is divisible by three, such as Dr Horowitz's touted 528 Hz, would be more "balanced" than one merely divisible by two, but why hold back on the evidence & how is 528 Hz the center of the sound & vision frequency ranges? Believe me, I'd love to know of a special frequency that was God-given & capable of spiritual uplift, but I would like solid, reasonable evidence, not diversionary mumbo-jumbo & half-baked excuses, which I may seem harsh in saying appear to litter the interview at the above link.

Much of the info at the Rense site is also of dubious authenticity & Jeff Rense is in my opinion (note: not intended to be a declaration of fact, unlike the claims of Dr Horovitz that I am critiquing & seeking further elucidation of here) one of the conspiracy-info world's more likely paid intell shills - but that is another story which I don't intend to get distracted by here. At the end of the day though, I am more concerned about whether or not we are letting our energies be drained by focusing on devised distractions? Almost certainly in some cases, though when & where is another matter. That which directs us into the above-mentioned fear-based mental/emotional/spiritual prison certainly merits closer scrutiny & those who reject such a valid contention equally so.

I would hope that you take this in the spirit of a much-needed challenge Dr Horovitz & rise to that challenge - for all of our benefits. The alternative perceptions & research world is an arena appallingly low on thorough, critical analysis & we do need to apply such analysis, while bearing in mind the need to be open-minded & giving a reasonable chance for all evidences to be heard before reaching conclusions. I am sticking to an area that I have some knowledge of here, others refute the existence of HIV - which existence is a principal contention of Dr Horovitz - & I will leave that to them to raise with him.

It is my hope that Dr Horovitz can not only enlighten us with clear, lucid evidence & independent, checkable sources to defend his 528 Hz assertions (& in the process dispel a few niggling doubts about his authenticity & agenda) & partake in te spirit of sportsmanship here.

Thank you all for reading. Please email me with any thoughts & observations, regardless of your take on things - especially Dr Horowitz.

In truth & awareness

- TS