Pages

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

DHS, Civil Liberties, and the real world

The Department of Homeland Security has mobile precrime modules. Phillip K. Dick's short story called "The Minority report" shows murder and other crimes being prevented by the efforts of 3 mutants that precogs. They can see the future. The Department of Homeland Seucirty don't have pecogs, but they have the Future Attribute Screening Technologies. It was originally called the Project Hostile Intent. The purpose of the program was to detect hostile thought by screening people at the border en even at public events. According to DHS science spokesman John Verrico in 2008, the program is capable of 78% accuracy on mal-intent detection, and 80% on deception. On July 24, 2008 then DHS Under Secretary Jay Cohen stated that the goal of the program is to create a new technology that would work in real time as opposed to after a crime is already committed. “The system uses a battery of sensors — everything from simple cameras to infrared sensors to eye-safe laser radars — to do its job, and it then collates the data to determine if people are displaying biological markers that betray mal-intent,” Gizmodo reports. In other words, a technology able to detect and prevent precrime or, more accurately, thought crime. The FAST video ignores the fact that this technology violates the Fifth Amendment of the American Constitution. The Bill of Rights is violated all of the time as a quaint anachronism in the war on manufactured terrorism. The purpose of this technology isn't necessarily to stop crime, but to condition the larger public to accept a high-tech totalitarian police state (and to acquiesce to all kinds of intrusive behavior by the government officials and law enforcement). Even years ago, these act would be wholely rejected as unacceptable. The FAST program is just one part of larger projected made by the Department of Homeland Security. The DHS really want to transform America into a high tech Stasi surveillance policee state. Some of these projects deal with mind reading, biometrics, and the penetration of social networks. They go by many names. They include: the Credentialing Project (developing “credentialing systems” that incorporate biometric information), Enhancing Public Response and Community Resilience Project (an effort to fully integrate state and federal emergency programs), High Impact Technological Solution – Biometric Detector Project (an effort to “provide efficient, high quality, contact less [sic] acquisition of fingerprint biometric signatures for identity management”), Insider Threat Detection Program (designed to “detect insider behavior that is likely to present or lead to a threat to critical infrastructure using behavioral indicators”), , and others. The FAST interrogation trailer can be used in high security events and other places like malls, grocery stores, workplaces, and at strategic locations in our neighborhoods. This isn't paranoid fantasy. The police state incubators have been deployed in England as mobile metal detectors since at least 2008. In 2005, George Churchill-Coleman, who at one time headed Scotland Yard’s anti-terrorist squad, told the Guardian Britain is becoming a police state. “I have a horrible feeling that we are sinking into a police state, and that’s not good for anybody. We live in a democracy and we should police on those standards,” he said. The TSA have expanded its operation from airports to school buses. The government have protrayed anyone with dissent over the policies of the government as terrorists or akin to al-Qaeda. In 2008, Glen Beck and the neocon Joel Rosenberg said that a perfect storm of terrorist attacks would be made up of Marxists and al-Qaeda operatives. Beck lies and said that 9/11 truthers would target Obama for assassination. Beck's propaganda is similar to the corporate media's lies about trying to force people to enjoy the nullification of our rights (as found in the Bill of Rights and Constitution) in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. General Tommy Franks in 2003 told Cigar Aficionado magazine that a big terrorist attack could end our constitutional government to be replaced with a military form of government. The Pentagon in 2004 forced residents to have biometric IDs (made up of a retina scan and an ID card) after Falljuah, Iraq was leveld in response to resistance after the illegal invasion of Iraq. Operatives of the government want all Americans to have biometric ID card system today. “National identification cards, long feared by privacy advocates, may soon become mandatory for American workers. In a bipartisan effort to curb the hiring of illegal immigrants, Sens. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) have proposed legislation that, if passed, will require all working Americans to carry biometric ID cards containing fingerprint records and other personal information,” The Week reported on March 11. We don't need thought crime trailers at all. Comparing the Oath Keepers or even a legitimate militia group to al-Qaeda is a lie and slander. These slanders are being promoted by the Southern Poverty Law Center, the DHS, and others. People have a right to promote the Bill of Rights, believe in the Second Amendment, have questions about illegal immigration, and oppose the policies of Barack Obama. The DHS is something else. We should hope nothing terrible occurs in this nation, especially since the federal government will exploit such an occurence as an excuse to promote their Big Brother policies.










A "Freedom of Death" T-Shirt has been described as an incitement to terrorism according to airport security. The person who wore it was a British holidaymaker. He was ordered to covered up the T-shirt by airport security. He was accused of threatining people and using an incitement to terrorism. Lloyd Berks is the owner of the shirt. He's 38 years old and a father of 2. He was ordered to obscure the shirt while passing thorugh security gates on his way to flight to Austraia. the hsirt is a white Levi Straus design, which is found in hundreds of high street stores from across the UK. It depicts a skeleton, flanked by two revolvers, with the famous phrase emblazoned above in turquoise lettering. “First they told me take my shoes off and checked my wallet, which is understandable,” Berks told the UK Daily Mail. “Then they said airlines might be worried by my T-shirt because its “threatening”. I thought they were joking at first. I was with my family. I was hardly a terrorist risk.” “It’s an attack on people’s civil liberties. What has happened to common sense? Have people forgotten how to use it?” Mr Berks added. Peopel showing their freedom have been falsley called a threat in many circles. Later, airport officials have apologized to Mr. Berks and admitted that the incident was unnecessary. This has been going on all across the Earth. There was a person called Bard Jayakody, who is 30, from London who was preventing from passing security at Heathrow's Terminal 5 and threatned with arrested (after his Transformers T-Shirt was called "offensive"). Mr. Jayakody said that at first the guard started joking with him about the Transformers character depicted on his French Connection T-Shirt. He said that Megatron is holding a gun, he wasn't allowed to fly. This is political correctness going amok. There was a student in Bellbrook High School in Ohio. The unammed teenage chose to wear a T-Shirt with the words "not my President' superimposed over a picture of President Bush. When a crosshair was added to the design, 2 students came over a picture of President Bush. When a crosshair was added to design, 2 students came forward and complained to school administrators. The Assistant Principal then amde the decision to call the FBI because the high school kid was falsely considered a terrorist planning to assassinate Bush. The FBI actually treated the case with the utmost significane and the investigation was eventually turned over to the Secret Service. The 2 kids who snitched on the teenager are called heroes. The Assistant Principal said that they complied with the demand of the govenrment. The DHS want to promote the idea that citizens should stand with Homeland Security to key an eye on "potential terrorist activity" when this activity has nothing to do with terrorism at all. There is a 14 year old from Lancaster, PA who was reprimanded for wearing a T-Sirt with the image of a gun printed on the front and back. This shirt was worn by a Penn Manor freshman to honor his uncle. His uncle was a soldier in the U.S. Army fighting in Iraq. There was the 80 year old veteran who was arrested at a mall for wearing an anti-war T-Shirt. The shirt was splotched with red and emblazoned with a simple message about the fatilities of the Iraq War: "4,000 troops, 1 million Iraqis dead. Enough.” There is the T-Shirt seller from New Orleans, who was investigated by Homeland Security officials for selling anti-FEMA T-Shirts. this is a reflection of some frustration with the government's response to the storm that left him homeless and unemployed. Or the Australian man who was barred from a London-Melbourne flight unless he removed a T-shirt depicting George Bush as “the world’s number one terrorist”. A lawyer was arrested and charged with trespassing at a public mall in the state of New York after refusing to take off a T-Shirt he had just purchased at the mall bearing the words: "Give peace a chance." Two more terrorists were identified as a Texas couple arrested
and charged with trespassing in 2004. They refused to cover up homemade T-Shirts with anti-Bush slogans. The front of the T-shirt has the international symbol for no superimposed with the word Bush. The back of Nicole Rank's T-Shirt said "Love America, Hate Bush." On Jeffrey Rank's T-Shirt was the message that: "Regime Change Starts at Home." In Britian, a 20 year old gamekeeper was a arrested at Game Fair in 2005 for words on the T-shirt. Charlotte Denis, from Gloucestershire, was stopped by police as she left the Countryside Alliance stand because of the “offensive” slogan. T-Shirts will words or various slogans on them aren't a threat to the free world. These policies and actions ignore real threat like civil liberty issues, population control, ways to solve illegal immigration in a compassionate, yet forthright way, and other things.



The anti-free speech lobby promotes the lie that anyone questioning the government is akin to having a hate crime. This group is the Simon Wiesenthal Center, who have sincere in the organization though. Their report smears people who question the government as racists and terrorists including labeling conspiracy related information as hate. They want to limit and intimdiate free speech on the Internet. I disagree with somethings on the Internet, but I don't agree with censorship of the whole Internet though. People have a right to express view that I agree or disagree with. In an article entitled, Terrorists Targeting Children Via Facebook, Twitter, Fox News affords sympathetic coverage to the 2010 Digital Terrorism and Hate report, which lumps in “conspiracy theories” with “lone wolf extremists,” “bomb making instructions” and “hate games,” implying that dissemination of “conspiracy theories” also amounts to some form of child abuse. That's slander of course. Individuals that expose the mass financial raping of our resources, dissent over the federal government, etc. is called a terrorists by some of these groups like the SPLC, the DHS, etc. This assault on the Internet coincide with efforts on behalf of numerous governments to censor the Internet as well as the U.S. government’s efforts to control and regulate the world wide web under the guise of Cybersecurity. Legitimate dissent on evil and legitimate conspiracies being exposed aren't hate at all. Some in the Simon Wiesenthal Center promotes hate against those with whom they disagree with. They want to silent people and they want to limit legitimate criticism about some of Israeli policies against the Palestinians. The report bash anybody questioning the official 9/11 story, which a high number of Americans question the official story of 9/11 story. They view organ stealing of dead Palestinians by Israelis as anti-Semitic and false. However, a subsequent London Guardian report confirmed that Israel had routinely harvested organs from dead Palestinians without their family’s consent. Indeed, the former head of Israel’s forensic institute, Dr Yehuda Hiss, admitted to this in a television documentary. How could this story be a lie according to the Simon Wisenthal Center when one of Israel's top state doctors admit that this organ harvesting is a common routine occurence. This is illogic on the part of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. It's not a hate crime or anti-Semitic to expose this informaiton. As Jewish scholar Norman G. Finkelstein explains in his monumental book, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, the Simon Wiesenthal Center played a fundamental role in smearing Swiss banks as depositories of looted Nazi gold supposedly stolen from Jewish holocaust victims during world war two, a claim completely overblown and exploited for financial profit on behalf of Jewish organizations interested only in filling their own coffers with little or nothing of the proceeds going to actual holocaust survivors, as Finkelstein documents. There are sincere, righteous Israelis and Palestinians who want peace and abhor the evil going on in the Middle East. So, I want to make that perfectly clear. Grouping legitimate conspiracy information to racism and terrorism is the old lie that the ADL, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center promote. They promote the anti-American tactic of hating free speech in order to crush dissent. The SPLC released its report earlier this month promotion the notion that domestic terrorists were being provoked to commit violence by Internet “conspiracy theories,” which just days later was followed by the suspicious Pentagon shooting. The Pentagon shooting was exploited by the corporate mainsteam media in order to demonize 9/11 truth activists as a deadly threat. That's false since there wasn't a previous instance of a 9/11 truth person doing violence or any crime in pursuit of their cause at all. The Pentagon shooter isn't representative of the 9/11 truth movement anyway since violence against innocent people is evil and never a way to solve problems.




Lifenews is here. The National 40 Days for Life pro-life effort have saved up to 298 babies from abortion. This campaign deals with prayer and assistance to women to end abortions. People have fasted as well. People prayed at the 40 Days for Life vigil outside of an abortion center in Mission Hills, California. People watched as a woman arrived for anabortion appointment. Volunteers spoke to her briefly as she walked toward the building. The woman seemed upset with what she was about to do. She went in anyway. When she came out a bit later, a pro-life counselor asked if she had changed her mind. She said no and she forgot her Medicare card at home and had to go to get it. The counselor responded, "You know, that's just God telling you that you're not supposed to be here. "The woman acknowledged the comment," Patti said,"and left crying. She did not return!" Shannon coordinates the 40 Days for Life campaign in Memphis, Tennessee. She said that a young lady came up to ask them what they thought about abortion. Shannon asked if she was pregnant and the woman said yes. The woman then asked Shannon how long she would be out on the sidewalk. "I told her as long as she needed me to be there." The young woman went into the facility ... and later walked back out. Shannon then gave her information about pro-life options. She said she had nowhere to go. "She actually seemed relieved," Shannon said, "like a big weight was taken off of her to know there was another alternative." Jeanie is one of the leaders of the 40 Days for Life effort in Syracuse, New York. She said that: "...Part of our community outreach this campaign is focusing on getting the word out about the disproportionate amount of abortions performed on minority women..." She was able to speak to a couple of women who were on their way into the Planned Parenthood abortion center. She told the women that abortion is the leading cause of death for African-Americans. They were suprised by this information and readily decided to seek the help offered at the crisis pregnancy center next door. One of them walked by a little while later and simply said "thank you" as a big smile came across her face. "Yes, there is help and hope," Jeanie said, "and we can offer this hope to women in very desperate situations." People have a right to help women in need of couseling in risk of having abortion. Abortion is destroying unborn human life.






CFR member George Soros is working with the United Nations to harm the Second Amendment. A video shows that Rebecca Peters (who is the director of the International Action Network on Small Arms or the IANSA) is working with the United Nations plus government globally to grab guns. They are funded by the globalist George Soros. Peters is the Chair of the National Coalition for Gun Control. This group campaigned to tighten Austrialia's gun laws in the 1990's according to Umut Foundation (which is an organization that wants individual disarmament in harmony with the European Union). Her research and advocacy helped to get sweeping changes like uniform gun laws across eight states, a ban on semiautomatic rifles and shotguns, and a year long buyback that destroyed nearly 700,000 weapons. Peters recieved the 1996 Australian Human Rights Medal for her country's highest human rights honor. Prior to working with IANSA, Peters worked for Soros' Open Society Institute. Soros has dedicated a large percentagge of his income gained from manipulating international stock and currency markets to push for gun control. He exploits many establishment liberals and push his gun grabbing agenda. George Soros funnels cash via his OSI or the Opern Society Institute to anti-gun groups like the Tides Foundation, the HELP Network and SAFE Colorado. "...He and seven rich friends founded their own political committee — Campaign for a Progressive Future — and spent $2 million on political activities in 2000, including providing the prime financial backing for the Million Mom March. OSI has supported UN efforts to create international gun control regulations and has singled out the United States for failing to go along with the international gun-prohibitionists,” notes the NRA. “The bottom line is that international gun banners want every gun — every single gun worldwide — to be under U.N. and government control,” notes Wayne LaPierre of the NRA. “And that includes your rifle, your shotgun, your handgun, and even family heirlooms that have been handed down from generation to generation.” Before Lou Dobbs was forced out of CNN, he exposed that the Barack Obama administration stands behind CIFTA or the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms. Obama and crew are pushing this treaty under the pretense that it will disarm drug cartels and criminals. The treaty's aspect introduces major gun control and most of which will affect average citizens. It can nullify the 2nd Amendment completely. In 2009, Barack Obama told Mexican President Felipe Calderon that he would do everything in his power to get the U.S. Senate to pass the treaty. Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, international legal obligations are superior rank to national law. If the CIFTA treaty is ratified, and not having defined the exceptions to its many requirements within our Constitution, it would usurp U.S. sovereignty and open the door to additional legislation to support its application in U.S. law. “Obviously, the United Nations, from its very inception, has been one of the world’s most ardent gun control proponents. As anyone who has ever driven by the U.N. building in New York City knows, a huge statue of an American-made revolver with its barrel twisted in the shape of a pretzel greets every visitor. The CIFTA treaty is one of the U.N.’s pet projects in order to achieve this long-held ambition,” writes Chuck Baldwin. In October of 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the United Nations something. She told them that the U.S. would support negotiations of an Arms Treaty to regulate international gun trafficking. 2 weeks earlier, the U.S. joined a nearly unanimous 153-1 U.N. vote to adopt a resolution setting out a timetable on the proposed Arms Trade Treaty including an U.N. conference to produce a final accord in 2012. It's no secret that the U.N. have had a hostility toward gun rights for years. Secretary Annan back yers ago called for international controls on firearms like world leaders even then French President Jacques Chirac desired a global tax on firearms. The UN Security Council's "Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Small Arms" called for a comprehensive program of worldwide gun control and praises the restrictivegun policies of China and France. The dismanting of the Second Amendment as proposed by Soros, the U.N., and the globalists are apparent. They want an international treaty to make that reality more apparent. No one in the mainstream media is covering this issues except Lou Dobbs, who was unceremoniously bounced out of the media recently.

By Timothy

No comments:

Post a Comment