Pages

Monday, May 31, 2010

Political Controversies

Some have called the Tea party people fascists. Some Tea party people sincerely believe in their precepts and they aren't fascists. I assume that a small minority of them are indeed fascists since they reject any government intervention anywhere in society. A fascist typically hate a safety net and many Tea party members abhor any safety net. The moderates and independent conservatives & liberatarians in the Tea party sometimes are overshadowed by the fascists. These fascists blame Democrats or liberals alone for the problems in America (while they ignore Bush's rising of the deficit, his illegal, immoral wars of aggression, and his anti-liberty laws passed like the Patriot Act). The Republicans under bush flew a $5 1/2 trillion budget surplus, a balanced budget, and zero deficits. This doesn't mean that the Democrats are perfect since they aren't. Both parties have had their legacy of errors. Some of these fascists use intimidation in meetings nationwide in order to promote their warped agenda. They claim that they are the true Americans, etc. Tom Tancredo is one fascist. He claims to be apart of hte Tea party movement. He claims that American culture is superior to all other culture. He wants a civics test as a requirement for those to votes. That's wrong since that's a throwback to the poll tax and other discriminatory efforts to prevent black Americans from voting in polls. Tancredo is even against legal immigration. He's an extremist and he slandered Miami in bigoted terms (He called Obama Hussein plenty of times). Scapegoating the poor and minorities is one tactic of fascists. Tancedo's views are rejected by the majority of Americans, because you don't need to spout race based rhetoric to get your points across. So to Tom Tancredo who said " this is our country lets take it back" and to those who cheer ed him, here is a flash. Its not your country. You just live here. And are accorded the same rights every American citizen is given by the constitution. No more, no less. You just live in America. Its not yours. It belongs to, as Lincoln and the Constitution pointed out, "the people" and that means all of them. Palin is in the mix of the Tea Party too with her support of Rand Paul. Rand Paul came out and believe that private businesses can discriminate against people even if they are subject to U.S. law. Using his logic, private businesses like BP can do fraud, pollution, etc. without regulation. Rand and his ilk believe in private property rights and that's fine. Yet, private property rights don't trump human rights. Also, it's was the same mantra of states' rights that promoted segregration in the first place. Fox News anchor John Stossel last week expanded on Rand Paul's racist opening, to declare that elements of the 1964 Civil Rights Act should be repealed Stossel ignores that Hayek hated nationalism. John Stossel need to realize that the market is never perfect and safeguards are necessary to prevent corruption in the economy. Rand Paul refuse to accept labor rights, worker safety standards, and real environmental protection as great ways to improve American society. This is why new amendments are added to the Constitution to retify problems and even private industry are subject under legitimate laws. The very existence of the Constitution’s “Elastic Clause” demonstrates that the document is open change across different political epochs. Also known as the “Necessary and Proper” Clause, the Elastic Clause provides Congress with the power “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for the carrying into Execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.” This refutes Rand Paul's argument that we should make the Constitution as solely static and without change in anyway. Paul Joseph Watson can say that the government instituted segregration and that's true. Yet, it was the private Klan that supported it. It's the private BP today that is involved in the great oil spill in the Gulf Coast. Also, privatized international banks have contributed to the economic crisis today as well. Ran Paul wants to keep Guantanemo Bay, he supports declaring war on Afghanistan and he says Obama is soft on Iran & that BP is good. BP was involved in the Iranian coup of 1953. He's a typical politican. I will mention that the majority of Tea party members aren't extremists or terrorists.



Anti-immigrant rhetoric is nothing new. Immigration for thousands of years have been a blessing in the world. This anti-immigrant movement have ties to racists, eugenicists, and other evil people. Tom Tancredo in his book "In Mortal danger' bash Hispanic Americans and use cultural condescension against Muslims and African American. Trancedo doesn't beleive that babies born in America should have citizenship. This is ironic since Trancedo's grandparents were immigrated into the U.S. from Italy. Some of the same nativist rhetoric he embraces his ancestor were demonized using those same words he spews today. He believes in his version of the traditional America. What America does he means. Does he mean the America where people's lands got stolen or folks were lynched or the America were real tolerance made real changes in America. Trancedo spoke where the crowd had Confederate flags and this event was promoted by the neo-Confederate League of the South. Dr. Michael Hill is the League of the South's President. He said that the U.S. is being overrun by immigrants of non-white descent. Trancedo in his book promote Winston Churchill's 1899 bigoted tone against Muslims. He supports Ann Coulter. Coulter defended racists Charles Murrary and Richard Hernstein's "The Bell Curve" that falsely links race to IQ. Coulter uses slurs against Muslim. Trancedo is a hypocrite by claiming individualism, but propose that everyone from "suspect countries" should be deported immediately. Victor Davis Hanson wants cuts in legal immigration and wants us to confirm to the Anglicized version of American culture. Hanson is from the Hoover Institution.
Hanson doesn't believe in cultural equality. Knight of Malta Pat Buchannan lies and said that America shouldn't have guilt about racism. Madison Grant was an eugenicist and another anti-immigration radical. He wrote the 1916 "The Passing of the Great Race" the racist words that; "...democracy is fatal to progress when 2 races of unequal value live side by side..." The racist Klan supported draconian restrictions on immigration in 1924. Grant was a lawyer and president of the New York Zoological Society. He was vice President of the Immigration Restriction League. The IRL called itstelf the Eugenic Immigration League. These people reject a man having a right to accept his or her own culture. The immigration movement have allowed the elite to polarize the African American and Hispanic communities in some cases. The good news is that vast majority of both communities haven't taken the bait to hate each other over this issue. There is the Minutemen movement. They are divided into 2 factions. One faction legitimately disagrees with illegal immigration and the other factions is radical and they won't even accept legal immigration. So, immigration is great and real reforms are needed since illegal immigration is a serious problem in America.





The abortion Drug Ellaone conerns pro-life advocates. A FDA hearing is coming soon about the drug. This is a new abortion drug. The Food and Drug Administration will see if they will allow the drug to come into the United States from Europe. Abortion backers bill the drug as another morning after pill and the drug works much differently. While the morning after pill has the ability to cause an abortion when used after implantation ellaOne, also known as Ulipristal, works as an abortion drug. EllaOne is meant to be used by women longer after sexual intercourse (in the time frame of not just 24-48 hours, but as much as five days later). At that point, if a pregnancy has occured, the drug can cause an abortion and kill an unique human being immediately after conception. Bradley Matters is the director of Life Institute. He talks about the problems associated with ellaOne. "Unveiled in Europe last year, ellaOne is classified as emergency contraception, but it works much like the abortion pill RU 486 by blocking progesterone from reaching the womb. Both drugs ultimately kill an unborn baby," he explains. Mattes said that abortion advocates can get away with caling the drug a morning after pill that prevents pregnancy or conception, because a physicians group pro-abortion activists control has redefined the medical terms. Mattes said that word starts to spread and as with the Plan b Pill that EllaOne only prevents pregnancies. "But keep in mind, the official American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology definition of pregnancy is not conception (union of sperm and egg), but implantation (attachment to the mother’s womb). These precious young babies are very much alive, but drug companies are discounting their first several days of life for the sake of extra cash," he said. Mattes mentions that studies on women showed that the drug can abort an existing pregnancy after implantation. Ann Glasier of NHS Lothian in Edinburgh led a study of more than 5,500 women in the UK. She published the study online in the Lancet medical journal. The study found fewer pregnancies among those women given the ellaOne drug within 5 days of intercourse. Women who took the drug between 305 days after having sex only women taking the traditioanl morning after pill became pregnant. Mattes said that: "This is a big step further than the abortifacient effects of emergency contraception. The goal of those promoting ellaOne is to first get it approved by the FDA for distribution by prescription, then later on, over the counter—just like they did with emergency contraception," Mattes said. "The ultimate goal is that abortion pills will be given to everyone who asks, without a prescription." On June 17, a FDA committee will have a public hearing on the drug and see whether to allow it in the U.S. Mattes believes that abortion advocates want to blur the line between abortion and contraception. There is a growing number or contingnet of americans who are ready to refute that lie. Dr. Donna Harrison is the President of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists agreed with the assessment of ellaOne (Ulipristal) as an abortion drug. Dr. Harrison doesn't want the pro-life community to be fooled about what Ulipristal is and how it works. Harrison fears that the drug will be able to be sold over the counter in the same way that the Plan B morning after pill is sold without a doctor's prescription or consultation. In England, the ellaOne drug is sold via prescription and costs almost 3 times as much as the morning after pill. Glasier told the Daily Mail she doesn't think the Ellaone drug will become as popular because women like the convenience of getting the morning after pill at a pharmacy without the prescription Ellaone requires. If those changes in England or becomes available without a prescription in the U.S. or other countries, the fears of pro-lifers will be confirmed. Abortion is murder like always.




The Bilderberg Group is now an open conspiracy. Tons of people know about it in the 2010 and the people should expose the Bilderberg Group completely. People have called for global government or the new world order for a while. More people know this today. Some of the Bilderberg's 2010 agenda is known today. According to some, the Bilderberg is talking about a potential military strike on Iran and the future collapse of the euro. According to Tucker, Trilateral Commission members (who routintely join the annual Bilderberg confab) talk about a war on Iran being debate. The elite continue to use the economic crisis fallout to push for centralized financial regulation. Some Bilderbergers are split in this issue of war with Iran as they were before the invasion of Iraq at the 2002 meeting. There was a recent Trilateral Commission in Dublin, Ireland. They discuss topics that the Bilderberg group discuss as well. The chief advisor to the Russian leadership Mikhail Slobodovsici unwittingly told a We Are Change member he mistook for a colleague, “We are deciding the future of the world….We need a world government,” he said, but, referring to Iran, said “we need to get rid of them.” This is nothing new. The reason is that Bilderberger and IMF chief Dominque Strauss-Kahn have told elitists in Zurich that the globalists need to seee the crisis as and opportunity to push for a new global currency issued by a global central bank. According to sources close to there Bilderbergers, the younger elitists fear that the economy is falling so fast (that it can make negative consequences among the wealth and influence of insiders will be threatened). There are divisions in geopolitics. Trilateral Commission co-founder and prominent Bilderberger Zbigniew Brzezinksi said that a global political awakening is occuring (that along with infighting can threaten to derail the move towards an one world government). The euro is collapse and people want to see if the U.S. dollar will grow in power. Former Bank of England policy maker David Blanchflower recently told Bloomberg News that the euro region could break up as a result of the debt crisis in Greece which threatens to spread to other countries on the continent.
As veteran Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker points out in his latest article, the corporate media has already been preconditioning the public to accept Bilderberg’s agenda for weeks.
“Bilderberg-controlled news outlets in Europe and the Western Hemisphere are conditioning the public to accept two of the super-secret elite’s major goals in advance of its meeting June 4-7 in Sitges, Spain: a U.S. attack on Iran and a financial bailout of Greece and other European Union (EU) countries,” writes Tucker. It isn't a secret that the agenda for global governemtn is real (and out of the open) alogn with the Bilderbergers grooming politicans to have high powered positions within the new world order hierachy. The most interesting aspect to come out of this year’s conference in Sitges Spain is the question of who will be attending. David Cameron has a new coalition government in the UK. It opposes the Bilderberg's European project in rheotric, but they have appointed pro-Euro politicans to influential posts. There is a possible attendance of Cameron and Nick Clegg to the Bilderberg group. Some UK Labour Party members may be invited to the group. Gordon Brown resigned in the UK (and the Bilderberg could recruit people like possible future Prime Ministers like David Millibrand).




Vatican History is easy to understand nowadays. The Cold War and the Cuban Revolutions are events with Vatican footprints all over it. Castro was Jesuit-trrained and in 1959 started his revolution. The CIA once supported him and distanced from him in the 1960's. He became a dictator. His brother Raul was Jesuit trained at the Celegio Lasalle and the Colegio Dolores. Henry Luce via Time once supported him since Batista was a dictator too. Batista unlawfully gained power. Castro's command post was in Havana' Hilton Hotel. These hotel chains were owned by Knight of Malta W. Barron Hilton. Later, Castro was attempted to be overthrown by the CIA via Allen Dulles and others. The reason was that Fidel Castro wanted to be independent absent major Western influence. The failed Bay of Pigs invasion was supported by Knight of Malta Robert Alejos Arzu and others . Aleojos was a sugar and coffee grow. He allowed the CIA use his plantations as training grounds for the 1961 invasion of Cuba. It failed that in term made Castro the sole ruler of Cuba. Alejos Arzu worked with Theodore Shackley. He was a CIA agent that was involved in Operation Mongoose (or another plan to assassinate Castro from the JM/WAVE station in Miami, Florida). Knight of Malta Gustavo Cisneros was involved in the Bay of Pigs invasion too. The Bay of Pigs betrayal was similar to the betrayal of patriots of Hungary back in 1956 and other events. Some believe that the Bay of Pigs was intentionally set to fail in order to cement Castro into power. President Kennedy fired Dulles and others for their erros in this failed invasion. Later, JFK wanted to end the Cold War, but he was assassinated in 1963.







By Timothy








No comments:

Post a Comment