Political Battlelines in America

The reports are saying that one out of every seven Americans are in or below the poverty line. That's a serious problem .The economic collapse is real. There is a shift in society and foreclosures are still high. People have left homes and some are homeless. The 1 in 7 figure is from 2009. The elite sucked the wealth from the middle class and especially the poor. Finally, the middle class should wake up and not just talk about the middle class, but the poor as well. They certainly didn't care about the middle class and the corportatists blatantly hate the poor. That is why they promote a regressive tax system all of the time. Both parties aren't doing enough to solve the problem. The Democrats blame Bush for all of the poverty. Yet, they have some responsibility in it as well with Glass Steagall Act repeal not just the Republicans. Some of them want to expand programs for the poor and have a safety net. I have no problem with this if it's done in a legitiamte fashion. Yet, long term, you should decrease the amount of people in poverty or in food stamps (which is made up of 40 million Americans now). A long term solution is public works programs to get people to work in jobs. The Republicans don't talk about any real solutions except tax cuts and private sector programs. Yet, the private sector now is hoarding wealth and isn't spending much money to help the economy. Some of them mock the 99ers when they have been unemployed and need some benefits to assist them. The Republicans lack much economic compassion and some of them don't care about workers. They allow the Democrats to gain votes from the poor by default. So, a short term and long term solution are in order to solve this problem. You have to have a safety net and you need long term infrastructure (including a jobs creation) system in place. The economic is still in bad shape. There are 14.3 percent of Americans in poverty. In 2009, 4 million more Americans are poor. The poverty rate is increasing fast. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development mention that the U.S. poverty rate is now the 3rd worst among developing nations.

Eugenics is real and has a long history. These are biocratic utopians. A 1913 Booklet admits that infanticide is the father of modern day eugenics. This obscure booklet (click for PDF) entitled “Ancient Eugenics” was written in 1913 by “late scholar” Allen G. Roper. It showed some facts on the origin and nature of eugenics. The author is a big proponent of eugenics himself. This work delves into the mindset of eugenicists. Many of them believe to be equal to God and they want the leisure of deciding who lives and dies. Roper proved that the ancients originated the lie of exterminating the so-called "weak" in favor of the so-called 'strong.' Roper doesn't just trace this philosophy back t the ancient Greek. He descends even further into the past until he wrote about the very beginnings of man. The preface to the history of Eugenics according to him comes from barbarism. The Spartan legislator didn't originate eugenics according to him, but the primitive savage (in his deluded mind) who kiled his sickly child. People Roper called savages lived short lives, they were deformed, and they were a burden to the tribe. Eugenic extremists believe that human law superseded natural law to justify killing babies at birth. Roper wrote that infanticide was done to preserve. Infanticide is immoral of course. Roper states outright that eugenics flows form the killing of babies. Roper believed that nature kills the unit by disagree. He belived that: "...Modern Eugenics is based on Evolution not a passive form, but one that concedes some latitude to the guiding action of the human will.” He wrote that infanticide was disappearing, so other people developed their Utopian dream. So, the human breeding plan of the Spartans evolved into the scientific stripiclture of Galton. Eugenics existed for millennia. Neo-eugenics came after WWII after the Nazis did it. The mainstream media claimed that it doesn't it. Yet, Rockefeller Foundation-funded groups have aided neo-eugenics, the radical environmental movement, etc. Many radical environmentalists used the example of infanticide, human sacrifice, and other evils to justify radical population control. So, extremists want a scientific dictatorship in the world. This eugenics agenda is based on the ancient practice of infanticide. Roper admitted that modern eugenicists have modified their tactics in using the state. Roper obsessed with population decrease of the so-called "unfit" and the stability of the population of the so-called "fit." Plato was obsessed with population and wanted a state with 8,000 people in it. Plato wanted the guardian to regulate the number of marriages. He believed that Numbers have a mystical dimension as occultists plus biocrats believe in. The modern George Guidestones said that: "....Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” This Malthusian goal of radical depopulation is nothing new. Roper wants the nation to accept eugenics in order for its tenets to be embraced. Roper wanted overt tactics in promoting the evils of eugenics. Eugenics was used as an instrument of the state in Nazi Germany, Europe, and even in the U.S. (with old laws that have forced sterilizations and other evils back decades ago0. The United Nations today promote population control efforts.


Pro-Life Manna is always here in the Universe. More and more people are waking up that abortion isn't a real choice. It ends choices and the unborn human babies is murdered in process of the act of abortion. The Maafa 21 film inspired a lot of people to be more Pro-Life than they once more. That is the documentary that exposed how Planned Parenthood was originated by eugenicists and some abortionists using bigotry as a justification to commit their deadly actions. The wealthy oligarchy instituted the slave trade, slavery, the Holocaust, various wars, abortion, and population control to promote not only racism (in demonizing their fellow human beings), but to decrease the world's population as much as possible. Human beings of many backgrounds have been pro-life and assisted people suffering from abortion too. You can't kill people to alleviate poverty. You create jobs, give assistance, and create real programs that can benefit the poor. Being opposed to abortion on demand isn't a partisan since folks from across the political spectrum are Pro-life. One Congressman Trent Franks have priase the Maafa 21 document. After on showing, one African-American woman who works as an aid to a pro-choice member of the Congressional Black Caucus said, “I was moved to tears. I came in here with an opposite mindset and I am leaving with another. My life has been changed forever.” Rev. Clenard Childress organized a group of African Americna pro-life activists that gave out 400 copies of Maafa 21 to members of the NAACP at their recent 4 day national convention. Later, the credentialed members of the NAACP cam back from their hotel room to ask what they could do to help. One person who woke up was an NAACP attorney. One professor at a historically black college said he was going to make Maafa 21 part of his curriculum. Many younger people has a resonance with the message since younger people are more Pro-Life than 2 generations ago. CFR member Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg admitted that Roe was decided because of concerns over population growth and growth that she didn't want too many off. One member of the Supreme Court pretty much admitted that Roe was create not to give women rights, but to preserve a population control ethos. Wanting certain people to not give birth is the essence of Eugenics. Kedi Obi Awabu is one California man spreading Maafa 21 across universities in America (that are predominately African American). Many groups of people are waking up about this issue. That's great news. Planned Parenthood have been caught in numerous scandals as well. Eugenics, population control, and Planned Parenthood are tied historically.

There has been an exposure of the Rwandan Patriotic front's bloody record, the Rwandan genocide, and the UN cover up parts of that evil genocide in the country of Rwanda. The Fench newspaper Le Monde shown the existence of a draft UN report. It described the violations of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in a span over an mutli-year period (from 1993-2003). The massive draft report states that after the Rwandan Patriotic Front's takeover of Rwanda in 1994 proceeded to carry out systematic and widespread attacks against the Hutu refugees who fled Rwanda to then Zaire (now, it's the DRC). They attack the Hutu civilian population of the DRC in gneeral. It concludes that the pattern of these attacks shows dangerous elements that if they were proven in a real court would consitute genocide. The draft report leaked out of the Le Monde out of the plausible fear that its most damning facts and charges against the armed forces of the Rwandan Patriotic Front and President Paul Kagame would be expunged prior to its official release Later, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navanethem Pillay announced that the official report's release would be delayed until October 1. They want to have comments to be possibly and a review of the draft. Some believe that the UNHCHR would act in this strange way, because they could want to cover up the role of Rwandan forces in UN peacekeeping operations. Earlier this year, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon appointed Kagame to serve along with Spain's Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero as co-chairs of a new Millennium Development Goal Advisory Group. According to the New Yorker's Philip Gourevitch , some people are allies of the Kagame dictatorshiplike Alison Des Forges. Some people want to sell the official 1994 Rwandan genocide story. As Rwanda's Minister of Foreign Affairs Louise Mushikiwabo confided in Gourevitch, "If it is endorsed by the U.N. and it's ever published, . . . if the U.N. releases it as a U.N. report, the moment it's released, thenext day all our troops are coming home. Not just Darfur, all the five countries where we have police." Kagame's dictatorship is the client state of the U.S. government. Glen Ford said that Kagame acts as a mercentary for U.S. interests in Africa. It is Washington's ties to Kagame' RPF, ultimately, as well as London's and Brussels', that public discussions of the draft UN report should turn the spotlight on. Some view the U.S. as an enabler of the murder of over 6 million people in Rwanda. There was an old UN report on Rwanda to see if massacres of Hutus took place. Some believe that the attack on Rwanda was a means to attack Zaire. The Hutus were moved into Zaire later on after 1994. The UN must explain why the record of that 1994 presentation by Robert Gersony was marked "confidential" and why the latest draft UN report does not refer to it. Now that the draft UN report on the atrocities committed by the RPF in the Congo has been leaked, the findings of the very first UN report of RPF atrocities against the Hutus beginning in 1994 should also be recognized and addressed.




I don't agree with the Tea party on every issue, but even I know that the Homeland Security have gone overboard on many occasions. Back in November, the Pennsylvania Homeland Security shown a bulletin saying that 2 Tea Party rallies against illegal immigration might attract 'white nationalists.' This report was presented by the Israeli company called the Institute of Terrorism Research and Response. Karen Kiefer is a Tea party activist from Scottdale. She told the Pittsburg Tribune Review that this is one of the more bizarre things that she has ever heard. There are $103,000 in taxpayers' money to compile lists like this. Wayne Madsen talk about the involvement of the Israeli company in an effort by Pennsylvania's Homeland Security to spy on activists that are exercising their First Amendment rights. One entity paid a Philadelpha based nonprofit $125,000 to compile a list of activists as part of the state Homeland Security’s federally mandated mission to protect public infrastructure. Pittsburgh officials have refused to comment on the role ITRR played in tracking and sabotaging activist groups that planned to protest the 2009 G20 summit in their city. The company was in fact not a non-profit and is based in Israel. Regardless of the deception by Kurt Nimmo, the NAACP just portray the Tea Party the need to condemn racist elments in the Tea party Movement. Nimmo forgot that elements of the Tea party is racist. There is evidence of this like signs comparing President Barack Obama to a witchdoctor, the use of slurs on signs, and the bigotry shown by individual protesters. The resolution followed accusations by the the Congressional Black Caucus that anti-Obamacare protesters had spit on Rep. Emanuel Cleaver and hurled racist slurs at the Caucus. This accusation is controversial. Cleaver said a Tea Party protester did not spit on him intentionally. “All I’m saying is we all have to defuse it, and I think it is not in my best interest or in the best interest of this nation to stoke it,” he said on March 30 during a Fox News interview. The Southern Poverty Law Center and other in the corporate media view the Tea party as collectively racist, which I don't agree with. Mark Potok of the SPLC believe that the Tea Party movement is: "...shot through with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism.” The corporate media routinely uses SPLC literature and features Potok as an “expert” on the “radical right.” Potok needs to realize that people calling for the new world order, the dangers of fluoride, and the evils of corporate policies aren't theories. These are 100 percent unadultered facts. Potok is a big liar. George Soros and his agents have created a website to track the Tea Party movement. We can disagree with reactionary rhetoric, but we should not support a Left Gatekeeper like George Soros. Meghan McCain said that young people are turned off by the innate racism of the Tea Party. I don't agree the Tea Party is collectively racist, but some of their ideologies are those that I don't agree with at all. On Friday, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the DHS report issued last April is now “ancient history.” Napolitano was asked about the “right-wing extermism” report during a lunch hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. The DHS report didn't mention the Tea party movement. What it did mention was the demonization of military veterans, pro-life groups, 2nd Amendment activists, and others as equivalent to domestic terrorists. That is slander. The report also claims white supremacist and “lone wolves” pose the most significant domestic terrorist threat. Lone wolves have done great contributions in world history. So, the DHS is all about lies and propaganda.








By Timothy