Friday Notes in March of 2011

The anti-union law in Wisconsin has been temporarily blocked by a judge. This is a new event in another sage over time. Scott Walker (or Wisconsin’s present Governor) desires to curb collective bargaining rights for public workers in Wisconsin. The judge blocked the law and this might cause the Legislature to have votes against to pass the bill. Some protests in Wisconsin have been as large as 85,000 people for weeks. Some Senate Democrats left the state into Illinois for 3 weeks. This caused the new era of the labor movement. The court battle will continue. Walker and his Republican legislative leaders will continue the battle. The question is whether the law was created under the proper procedures or not. The Judge is Dane County Judge Maryann Sumi. This decision came after a lawsuit was filed by the local Democratic district attorney. It alleged that Republican lawmakers violated the state’s open meetings law by hastily convening a special committee before the Senate passed the bill. Sumi said that her ruling would not prevent the legislature from reconvening the committee with proper notice and passing the bill again. The laws restricted bargaining rights and require most public workers in the state to contribute more to their pension and health care costs. These changes will amount on an average to an 8 percent pay cut. Walker’s spokesman Cullen Werwie is confident that the bill would be a law in the near future. Let’s hope that the law will be destroyed in the interest of real labor human rights. Senator Tim Cullen will stay in the state to vote if the bill comes up again. Democratic Senator Jon Erpenbach wants both parties to come together in order to make a proposal all parties can get along with. "Wisconsin's educators call upon the Legislature to take this as a clear signal those Wisconsinites will not tolerate backroom deals and political power plays when it comes to our public schools and other valued services," said Mary Bell, president of the Wisconsin Education Association Council. Marty Beil, director of the state's largest public employee union, said in a statement, "We are gratified to see some of our so-called `leaders' finally held accountable for their illegal actions." Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne filed the lawsuit this week alleging the open meetings law was violated because 24 hours' notice wasn't given for a meeting of the special legislative committee convened to amend the bill. The judge said that the DOJ couldn’t show the committee was exempt from the 24 hour notice requirement. The moving was the right step in a true direction. The law tried to plug a 137 million dollar state budget shortfall (in forcing state workers to increase their health insurance and pension contributions to save the state 30 million dollars by July 1). We don’t need collusion between government and corporate-Koch related businesses. You can’t create jobs by destroying our national infrastructure.

The United Nations have authorizes a no fly zone in Libya. This means that military strikes from the West can attack Qaddafi’s forces. The United Nations authorizes all necessary measures against Qaddafi. Ironically, neo-liberals (or the left gatekeepers) are rejoicing. This is the same group of people opposing the Iraq War for the excuse that war is immoral. To them, war is immoral unless it has the token approval from the UN under humanitarian rhetoric. In war, you will see dead bodies, terror, and screaming children. Libya has the richest oil nation in the entire African continent. There are conflicts where innocent people are dying worse than Libya. The West only inspired the U.N. to do something about Libya, because Libya is a strategic area in terms of oil & other political interests. So, what we are seeing is a dictator Qaddafi once being a puppet of the elite. He’s facing a civil war and the West want him gone. They are doing any means necessary to get that goal accomplished even warfare. The guise of humanitarianism is the war cry. The United Nations is declaring war on Gaddafi. This is similar to the Balkans. The West wants U.S. military bases in Africa to protect foreign corporate power. This can lower the Libyan standard of living, etc. In the 21^st century in our technological age, total war is definitely unjustifiable and archaic. The U.N. won’t intercede in Bahrain when Saudi Arabia is invading Bahrain in order to maintain the Monarchy of the Kingdom of Bahrain in a theocracy. Libya wants to have an immediate cease fire or a military halt to military operations against civilians. The neo-cons and the liberal establishment agree to kill people in a nation that is strategic linked to their interest without caring about the Congo, Asian conflicts, or other battles in the world. A cease fire can change things about what could happen in that nation. This was done in a response to the U.N.’s no fly zone declaration.

The Japanese disaster has killed over 6,000 human beings. The Japanese nuclear disaster is used to justify the elimination of nuclear power. I won’t lose sleep if we don’t use future nuclear power, because of the risk factors. Yet, some are using this event to fear monger over Japan in high levels when we shouldn’t be involved in any form of fear mongering. Also, I don’t view a nation as an enemy if a nation chooses to have nuclear programs. There has been a decrease of nuclear weapons since the beginning of the Cold War. Some nations use nuclear power to be independent and globalists want to control nations that reduce their national independence. Space based weapons is a new factor in the world today. If nations are controlled more thoroughly, then the global super state can exist more effectively. The U.S. government has maintained a military space program. It is called the U.S. Strategic Command since the 1980’s (or the U.S. Space Command years ago). The Obama administration months ago want to merge NASA, which is the public face of the space program with the military space program. Private corporations are more involved in the business of space. This increases the globalists’ desire to have the militarization of space. The Soviet Union and the United States argued for space weapons back in the 1960’s. Space based weapons have occurred since the 1960’s. The Ronald Reagan administration has promoted the Strategic Defense Imitative. Much of the U.S. military space program is classified and considering the many secretive tests conducted at facilities like Nevada’s Area 51. Space based weapons are advanced. Many technologies are decades ahead of what are known publicly. One example is how the Internet existed back in the late 1960’s by DARPA (or the U.S. governmental group that’s dedicated to defense research and development). It was called ArpaNet. It was popularized in the 1990’s. Space weaponry can strike any nation on Earth that opposes the agenda of the global elite. There is kinetic bombardment. This is used by to harm places as well. Some of this technology is new like the hypervelocity road bundles. Even high level officials in the Russian military have expressed concerns about how they are falling behind the U.S. in the space based weapons race.  They are right to be concerned because it is a fact that whoever maintains supremacy in space will maintain supremacy on the Earth.  This is why advancements in space based weapons are critical to the New World Order agenda and why so many in the elite power structure are paying close attention to their development. The nuclear age is now shifting to the space age. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is closing many nuclear power plants in her country. The pros and cons of nuclear power can be debated, but the globalists want centralized control over all of the Earth’s resources. One way to do it is to eliminate independent energy power and resources in various nations.

There is the deal of the weakening of the abortion conscience rule that can hurt doctors. Many pro-life groups are sending a letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and warning her of the alarming effects on patients who follow the White House’s move to strip the medical community of key conscience protections on abortion. The Obama administration in February of 2011 overturned some protections pro-life medical workers had who didn’t want to be involved in certain medical procedures. In 2008, the Bush administration made a rule. This rule banned recipients of federal money from discriminating (against doctors, nurses, and health care aides) who refused to take apart in any medical procedures that they had religious or moral objections. The rule promoted existing conscience protection laws. These laws ensured that medical professionals can’t be denied employment because they don’t want to assist in abortions. The administration rescinded part of the protections by removing protections for medical workers (who have moral or religious objections to dispensing or giving to women the Plan B drug or other emergency contraception that could act in some cases as an abortion drug. This week, the Christian Medical Association, Catholic Medical Association, the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG), and Medical Students for Life are releasing a joint letter to Sebelius and it is calling on medical students and medical professionals to sign onto the letter before it is sent on March 22.The National Coordinator for Medical Students for life is named Dominique Monelzun. Dominique said that 95% physicians in a recent national poll agreed that they would rather stop practicing medicine altogether than be forced to violate their conscience. “The decision to take away doctors’ conscience rights has tremendous implications on the patients who need their care. Without conscience protections, many faith-based hospitals that provide services to millions have already said they would shut down rather than provide any abortion-related services,” Monlezun said. “Secretary Sebelius must retract the recent HHS policy change to protect current and future medical professionals, and the patients who require their care and expertise.” Kristan Hawkins is the director of Students for Life of America. She coordinated the letter. She believed that the Obama’s administration to remove the conscience protections on the controversial drugs will cause thousands of medical professionals plus students out of the health care field. To her, it will cause thousands of patients to be stranded in the rural areas and health care costs will increase because of a lack of doctors and medical facilities. The conscience clause is about promoting the freedom of conscience in general. The new regulation goes in effect in 30 days. Dr. J. Scott Ries (she opposes abortifacients and embryonic stem cell research) is from the 16,000 member Christian Medical Association. He believes that weakening the regulation prevents patient access to health care. It encourages faith based job discrimination in his mind. There is a shortage of primary care physicians.

Secret Societies still exist in the world. Secret Societies deal with the New Age agenda obviously. The New Age Movement is a new religion. It's the opposite of the Judeo-Christian ethic. This ethnic believe in the family, the right to life, the right to have private property, that all people have the right of the freedom of association and the freedom of religion (these are self evident rights or these rights aren't debatable since they exist from God). The New Age wants to deify man and believe in the Christ Consciousness (and anyone can have this consciousness if they accept the New Age views). Neitchze is a German philosopher and he was a rationalist. He was an anti-Christ. He blamed the Christian Church for many evils in the world. The priests in the Mystery School believe that Christianity is a corruption of the old Mysteries (or the worship of the sun or Lucifer being the false light). Today, the New Agers hate Christianity and Christians. This is found in popular culture, movies, TV, etc. New Ager David Splanger said that: "...We can take all the scriptures and all the teachings, and all the tablets, and all the laws and all the marshmallows, and have a jolly good bonfire and marshmallows roast for that is all they are worth." So, the New Agers hate mainstream religion when anti-religious extremists murdered over 100 million people in China, the then Soviet Union, and other places worldwide. The New Age like many Masons view dedicated Christians as the enemy. That is why Freemasonry is tied to the New Age Movement. What does this mean? It means that the moral relativism, compromise, and other themes in society today is related to the New Age Movement and this movement hates moral absolutes. New Agers want to merge Eastern mysticism with the Western occult (from Germany to the Celtic/Druid theology). The Theosophical Society (which was popularized by Freemason Henry Olcott and Helena Blavatsky). Extremist New Agers like Montgomery want to eliminate people deemed "unfit" and preserve the "fit" in the new Aquarian Age (as a part of the root race after this age of Pisces. This Aquarian Society involved in their deluded mind the Aryan people). Now, they or the New Agers may claim a form of godliness (talking about love, tolerance, and spirituality), but they deny the power thereof (this power being God as the Supreme Judge or the Supreme Creator not a person that excluses all sin in the guise of "tolerance").

By Timothy