U.S. Government Backs Libyan Al-Qaeda While Hyping Terror Attacks Inside U.S.

From http://www.infowars.com/u-s-government-backs-libyan-al-qaeda-while-hyping-terror-attacks-inside-u-s/

 

U.S. Government Backs Libyan Al-Qaeda While Hyping Terror Attacks Inside U.S.

Hypocrisy run rampant: Obama administration fearmongers about Libyan-backed terrorists carrying out reprisal attacks in America while launching air strikes to support terrorists in Libya
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Achieving new heights of hypocrisy, the U.S government is hyping the threat of Libyan-backed reprisal terror attacks inside the United States, while launching air strikes in support of so-called “protesters” who have commandeered fighter jets and tanks, and are in fact Islamic fundamentalist Al-Qaeda cells who want to impose sharia law in Libya.


______


The New York Times reports that Libya may “lash out” against the Orwellian “no fly zone,” which in reality represents constant bombardment, by sending terrorists to carry out attacks against U.S. interests.
“Asked if American officials feared whether Colonel Qaddafi could open a new terrorism front, President Obama’s top counterterrorism official John O. Brennan said: “Qaddafi has the penchant to do things of a very concerning nature. We have to anticipate and be prepared for things he might try to do to flout the will of the international community.”
“Al Qaeda has a demonstrated track record of trying to exploit political vacuums, political change or uncertainty in a number of countries,” Mr. Brennan added. “The situation in Libya now will be no exception.”
This is pretty rich considering the fact that it was British MI6 and the CIA who paid Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda $100,000 dollars to assassinate Gaddafi in 1996.
In 2002 French intelligence experts revealed how western intelligence agencies bankrolled a Libyan Al-Qaeda cell controlled directly by Bin Laden to hatch a plot to kill Gaddafi that was foiled in March 1996. The cell was led by Anas al-Liby, who was with Bin Laden in Sudan before Bin Laden returned to Afghanistan.
Indeed, it was Gaddafi’s Libya who put out the first Interpol warrant for Bin Laden’s arrest in 1998. Western intelligence agencies blocked the warrant from being pursued, and allowed Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda to go on and kill more than 200 people in the truck bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
Some of the very rebels now being funded and trained by western forces were part of the Al-Qaeda cell that tried to kill Gaddafi on behalf of the United States and Britain 15 years ago.
As the London Telegraph reports, “The West and al-Qaeda on the same side.” Libyan Al-Qaeda leaders have offered their unanimous support for the ousting of Gaddafi.
“An al-Qaeda leader of Libyan origin, Abu Yahya al-Libi, released a statement backing the insurrection a week ago, while Yusuf Qaradawi, the Qatar-based, Muslim Brotherhood-linked theologian issued a fatwa authorising Col Gaddafi’s military entourage to assassinate him,” writes Richard Spencer, highlighting how the “rebels” are in fact religious extremists hell bent on imposing sharia law in Libya.
While the global establishment media has characterized these mobs as “protesters,” even as they commandeer fighter jets and tanks, and used allegations of Gaddafi brutality against them as a justification for air strikes, in reality they largely comprise of radical Islamic fundamentalists who will end up being more savage in their abuse of power than anything Gaddafi was ever accused of, should the air strikes lead to regime change. The ordinary Libyan people, the majority of whom support Gaddafi, are caught in the middle, which is why many of them are now trying to flee Tripoli.
The UN-backed air strikes have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with protecting the human rights of “protesters”. The air strikes and Tomahawk missiles have been launched in support of terrorist cells so that the US military-industrial complex can repeat its age-old trick of installing a radical Islamic regime which they can later overthrow, giving them strategic access to the region and allowing them to control the largest oil reserves on the African continent.
This is about giving war a new facelift, leaving the new world order free to pillage any country they like in the name of “humanitarian” assistance.
The fact that the establishment media, particularly the BBC, which has aggressively pushed this “humanitarian” hoax in its rapacious cheerleading effort for the conquest, is parroting the narrative that this is a just war, when in reality it is about helping Al-Qaeda terrorists to carry through a coup d’état, is the ultimate hypocrisy.
It’s a hypocrisy made more revolting by the fact that liberals who so vehemently opposed the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq are now willing to offer their enthusiastic backing for military attacks having bought the sickening lie that the likes of the United States, which kills scores of innocent people every week with predator drone strikes, has now suddenly developed a conscience for human suffering.
It’s also galling to witness the likes of Fox News and mainstream conservatives, who screamed until they were blue in the face about a mosque being built at ground zero in New York, now ignorantly applauding a United Nations-ordered war with no congressional approval which is solely designed to bring Al-Qaeda affiliated Islamic fundamentalists to power.
The whole farce mirrors Bill Clinton’s bombing campaigns in Bosnia and Serbia, which were also about helping Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda to topple autocratic but relatively moderate regimes, and were also military conquests packaged in the cloak of “humanitarian” deception by the global establishment media.


______________

beijingyank says:

March 20, 2011 at 12:32 pm

Tarpley is rock solid when it comes down to the neo imperialists. His command of history and natural talent to critically think through complicated geopolitical issues is outstanding.
He, like all of us, is not perfect.
Every week on his Crisis Radio show he has “Dead End” Berg on. Listening to this cheap suit is like listening to a 33rpm record stuck on one track. Over and over again, the same hackneyed cliché’s. Nothing solid, only to know everything he has done legally has not only failed but closed the door to better legal action challenging Barky’s legitimacy to be puppet in chief. Was it Stalin or Lenin who said “the best way to control the opposition is to lead it?” Berg serves this purpose well. Fact is he is a shotgun. His cases fail, down one barrel, and he sucks money from Barky’s opposition at the same time for the second barrel.
There was a little humor in Tarpley’s show this week. Tarpley is an advocate of nuclear power. Although I sympathize with his economics to build America out of this financial mess, it’s obvious and apparent nuclear power is unsafe in any decade. Tarpley maintains the problem in Japan was obsolescence. “Forth generation pebble bed reactors are what we need.”
He doesn’t understand there is no solution to the waste. And current theory has nuclear fall out as the direct cause to the outrageous cancer rates.
The chuckle came when he mentioned “not one person has died from radiation in the accident,” and then rationalized the problem by comparing the coal industry to nuclear power and being responsible for having a worse safety record.”
The make of a great man is to understand when he is wrong and the courage to change his views when he discovers he is wrong. I take Tarpley as a man of this caliber, and after getting some better education about nuclear power, I suspect it won’t be long before he comes around. He needs to talk to Dr. Rokke, or the most recent great guest of Alex, Dr. Chris Busby.
Although long on economics, history and perhaps the best political commentator/analysis alive, Webster is short on science and the dangers of deadly radiation with a half life of 4 billion years.
He remains one of my favorite leaders in the Truth movement. Nobody is perfect.

Log in to Reply

• txgirl says:

  March 20, 2011 at 2:23 pm

  Me too, Tarpley is the bomb. He is smart enough to learn, I think.