Economic History is a long journey among the histories of humanity. We have a depression here in America and the world. Some fear fascism or another evil totalitarian system that can take over the world in a global government. Capitalism itself was never the same in history. It has changed and continues to change now. Even China has embraced more market based policies in its nation. In the 21st century, we see globalization causing a more global political economy (with proposals of a global economic system and international political organizations here now). To understand basic economic history, it’s fine to learn about the economic theories and political philosophies. We should do this even if you disagree with some of them in order to see the present economic reality now. Mercantilist writers like Friedrich List and Alexander Hamilton wrote critiques of Liberal economic concepts. List criticized a worldwide economy and instead wanted a national economy to handle economic conditions (that Adam Smith didn’t adhere to). List didn’t believe a universal union of confederation of nation to establish peace in international free trade. List wanted the merging of the political and economic realms and then allows the political realm to have more power than the economic realm. Of course, liberal economics believe in the free market view. They believe that the political and economic realms should be separate in order to allow businesses to be free (under the free market) to enhance economic output and economic development. Adam Smith believed in the invisible hand of the free market in his volume of his “The Wealth of Nations” back in 1776. List wrote that historically, a political had to precede an economic union. By the 19th century and beyond, major banking dynasties wanted use their economic union to form a political union to follow in its footsteps. The global hegemonic power of Great Britain supported this liberal economic theory (which is the ideological ancestor of Austrian Economics). The Bank of England was created back in 1694. It was a private central bank that would issue currency to the nation and lend it to the government plus interest at interest (which would be paid back to the Bank of England shareholders). These shareholders make up the private banking dynasties. Does this sound familiar? Yes, it sounds very similar to the Federal Reserve private banking system. From the 16th to 19th centuries, the nation-state and capitalism grew along with central banking. The economies in many nations were secondary or submissive to the political structure of nations. Liberal theorists oppose the economy to be submissive to the state like of course Adam Smith. He lived when the American colonies fought against the British imperial forces in North America. America created its independence after the Revolutionary War. This war had many reasons like the high colonial tax (on tea and other imports from foreign nations like France). This was done in an effort to promote the mercantilist assumptions that the colony should only survive and trade with the metropole (imperial hegemon) – which extracts the resources of the nation in trade for material goods to that nation, creating a dependence upon the colonial power. The colonists didn’t want a foreign imperial power to control inflation and devaluation of a currency to rule colonial conditions. Even the Founding Fathers of the United States knew that you have to control your own currency if one is to have true sovereignty and independence. America won and Britain lost that hit their mercantilist system bad. The French Revolution cam and the European bankers infiltrated the French Revolutions. They didn’t give short term credit to the government; they have delayed food to Paris. This caused hunger riots by Parisians. The bankers soon supported a general in the Revolutionary Army named Napoleon to restore order. Napoleon supported the bankers and created the Bank of France in 1800 (which was privately owned by the bankers. The bankers owned its share and even Napoleon bought shares in the bank). Napoleon had his empire and when he tried to attack England and tried to declare himself more powerful than the bank of France, the elite turned against him. The Rothschilds ascended to the throne of international banking with the Battle of Waterloo. After the French Revolution, the Rothschilds have established banking houses in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna and Naples. Some people believed that Nathan Rothschild made insider trading during the Battle of Waterloo and some don’t. What is true is that the Rothschild family has links to both the Vatican and Freemasonry. The British Empire followed the liberal economic concepts of Adam Smith from 1815 to 1914. Free markets and the invisible hand were supported by the elite. Yet in reality, the markets were really free and its hands have visible in imperialism, colonialism, and bigotry. Although, some who were in favor of mercantilism tried to justify colonization. Adam Smith did believe in some regulation to handle equity issues between employers and labor. Yet, extremists took Smith’s ideas on its head to promote a radical liberal economic order.
The Bilderberg insider Henry Kissinger is calling for an U.S. ground invasion of Libya. America now is embroiled in at least 3 major conflicts. We have to take care of our services, our debt (the Standard and Poor said that America wil soon lose its triple A credit rating since America’s inability to reduce the budge deficit. Although, human lives are more important than austerity), and Kissingers wants the U.S. to have a ground invasion of Libya. He also wants to keep the war continuing for at least another year. Kissinger spoke of these words in at least 3 different globalist confabs. Jim Tucker (who is a veteran Bilderberg Group expose and journalist) said that Kissinger gave almost the exact same speech at 3 different conferences over the past 2 weeks. First, it was in an April 8-10 get together at the George Washington University’s Elliot School of International Affairs, then at an Apsen Institute session on “Values and Diplomacy” at the National Cathedral, and in the Bretton Woods II conference in New Hampshire. Tucker have made routinely accurate information from the globalists’ secret meetings for years. “Kissinger, visibly depressed, gave a rationale for the war on Libya that the TC (Trilateral Commission) and its brother group, Bilderberg, want to keep rolling, according to an inside source who has proved reliable for years. Both groups want the war extended through 2012 to generate turmoil throughout the Middle East and pressure the United States into attacking Iran on behalf of Israel. Which would also produce huge war profits,” writes Tucker. President Barack Obama now wants to oversee unmanned drones to intensify the air bombardment. Some like Kissinger want an U.S. ground invasion. Right now, the intervention in Libya is costing Americans $608 million. The war in Libya is complex and arming the rebels could make a stalemate continue. The globalists have international agenda dealing with manipulating nation-states. In America, some say that they can’t afford to pay the police or firefighters. “In all three speeches, Kissinger played the reluctant damsel who was firmly convinced that the United States must put boots on the ground in Libya—among all the wars that the U.S. is already involved in,” reports Tucker. Tucker said that Kissinger is worried about the selling of the invasion of Libya. The reason is that it’s been found that some of the Libyan rebels have had links with Al-Qaeda terrorists. NATO is stilling using the rebels to fight against Gaddafi. Some reactionaries want to use Libya as an excuse to promote an U.S.-led attack on Iran. The new Bilderberg Meeting in 2011 will happen in the resort city of St. Moritz, which is in southeastern Switzerland from June 9-12. Some expect the luxurious 5-star Grand Hotel of Kempinski to hosue the people. This may be one of the most important Bilderberg meetings in recent years. Indeed, when attempting to book a room for the period in question via the hotel website, a message pops up saying the hotel is closed, all but confirming it as the location for Bilderberg 2011. However, Bilderberg have been known to change their plans at the last minute in a bait and switch to throw journalists off the scent. Tucker, who has been hunting Bilderberg for no less than 36 years, has released his Bilderberg itinerary for the 2011 meeting.
Sociology is a well known study of society. The cousins of sociology are anthropology, political science, and even to a certain extent history. Many of my relatives studied sociology before. It’s an interesting topics, because sociology deals with humanity. How humans interact with each other in a social environment is one out of a myriad of ways in deciphering human social activity. People use sociology to promote the development of human social welfare, to have counseling, to stop crime, to have census, to deal with economic development, and tons of other solutions to the ills of the world. That is why tons of people have degrees in sociology being a popular field of study. Socilogy can spread into gender, ethnicity, sexuality, law, the internet, science, social class, and other issues. You can’t forget about language in studying sociology, because the use of language deals with the diversity of human culture as well.
There are other legacies of Ronald Reagan that are controversial. He was the first Governor to increase personal income taxes by 60%, to increase the cigarette tax by 200%, and increase state tax collection by 152%. He was the first President to increase spending by 80% in only 8 years. He was the first President to have unemployment at 10.8% since the Great Depression. He honored Nazi stormtroopers by calling them “innocent victims.” He have had over $10,000,000 increase in wealth from serving for 8 years as President. In his frist term, Reaganites James A. Baker, David Stockman, etc. ran roughshod over Democrats like Tip O’Neill to win critical votes on politics. Phil Gramm was a House Democrat in that time and he even sponsored the most important Reagan budgets. When Reaganonics didn’t work to handle the receission, Democrats regained some control in Congress. This stopped some Reagan initiatives, but couldn’t do much on their own. This caused gridlock in Congress after 1984. There was the S&L crisis too (his tax policy drove gentrification, urban displacement of people, and tax incentives for real estate speculation). With a red ink explosion – $300 BILLION deficits looming as far as the eye could see – GOP Senators, notably including Bob Dole, led the way on tax hikes. The economy enjoyed its recovery only after total tax increases larger than the total tax cuts were implemented. Most importantly, average annual GDP growth during the Reagan 80s was lower than during the Clinton 90s or the JFK-LBJ 60s. When Reagan was in office in 1981, the CIA told him that the Soviet Union was collapsing from within. The Soviets were cutting their own defense spending by 1980. They couldn’t handle the undermanned, and very poor Afghanistan forces in the late 1970’s. Even Richard Nixon told Reagan he could balance the budget with big defense cuts. It was Magaret Thatcher , Reagan’s allies, and Gorbachev to convince Reagan to act more peacefully in making agreements to promote détente and an end to the Cold War. Tons of people in the Reagan administration were straight up crooks and criminals. Some have been convicted and others have been pardoned. He refused to mention the words AIDS. Reagan ended according to some almost all federal housing funding, paving the way for homelessness to remain a persistent problem in America over 25 years later. The cuts to social welfare programs and the Veterans Administration caused an enormous rise in the homeless population, especially in D.C. Even comedians us the “Comic Relief” program to do something about homelsseness in America back in the 1980’s. Reagan pushed for the destruction of federally-funded legal services, arts and humanities, and volunteer programs such as the then activist-oriented VISTA program. What programs Reagan could not kill, he weakened.
Symbolism is common all over the world. There are symbolism throughout the 2012 Olympics coming up in London. There are 2 mascots in the 2012 Summer Olympics. It has symbolism. Wenlock and Mandeville are the names of the mascots. They have bizaree animations that depict 2 drops of steel from a steelworks. The International Olympic Committee made them the official mascot for the 2012 Olympics games on May 19, 2011. There is a representation of the All Seeing Eye there. The eye is crowned with a capstone of the unfinished pyramid (this refers to the Plan of the Ages to make ascension complete. Wenlock means holy monastery in Irish tradition. It’s a boy’s name too. Mandeveille means great town. It’s also a real person named Mandeville that didn’t believe in moral restraints (similar to Aliester Crowley and Rabaeias. Rabaeias was a clergyman that was congtroversial in his actions). Bernard De Mandeville was a Dutch doctor and might have been apart of the Hell Fire Club (that had orgies and believed in the Do As Thou Wilt satanic philosophy long before Crowley). Mandeville believe that vice was a virtue, which is wrong. This coming Summer Olympics is the 30th one. Rik Clay wrote tons of information about the XXX Olympics in many ways. Popular culture is still here. Lady Gaga uses Judas in the song as a metaphor for the bad things that she gets drawn back into (while simaleutenously claiming to love God). Judas in the New Testament betrayed Jesus Christ. In the song, Lady Gaga said that she is beyond repentance. That’s self-explanatory. Being without repentance means that she admits to not want to have repentance. She sings that Jesus is her virtue, but Judsas is the demon that she clings to. Being in love with vices doesn’t make people more morally better. She wants to create a new reality in spirituality indeed and it isn’t mainstream Christianity. Really, the beliefs of Lady Gaga aren’t new. They are from the old New Age Mysteries that have existed eons ago. It doesn’t take a genius to see that the real global elite have a hatred of Christians and any believer in God since the elite don’t want to worship God the Creator in numerous cases. They want to worship themselves, Nature, or even Lucifer/Satan. They want their “great plan” to come, but God has the better plan of salvation and tranquility.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment