Pages

Sunday, November 20, 2011

More Information



Times are changing and more people are waking up about the truth. We can’t rely on Gingrich’s hypocrisy on corporate funding, the 999 obsession, or Rick Perry’s Bilderberg ties to save us. We need real solutions. We have to think more critically about political matters in order to have a more progressive society. So, it’s important to learn about scholars and other facets of the world. Learning about Aristotle, Plato, Kierkegaard, Lincoln, Dr. King, Jefferson, Malcolm X, and others can enrich human thinking about philosophy and other aspects of existence too. As for foreign policy, we can’t embrace a militaristic and interventionist philosophy. That philosophy has been discredited by the events of the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan. These wars caused more tensions in the Middle East and drained out resources that could be better utilized in building up our domestic infrastructure like hospitals, health in general, assistance to the poor, and other legitimate parameters. We can’t be satisfied when there is materialism and bigotry in the world. We can’t be satisfied when over 40 million people are on food stamps. We can’t be satisfied when people scapegoat the ghettoes of America and other poor communities when they refuse to blame reactionary policies as the origin of our straits. We can’t be satisfied when the judging of a person based on their color or physical appearance is one common iota of world culture. We will never be satisfied until real justice comes like thunder and true grace is placed upon all peoples. That means that righteousness & equality are sent among all backgrounds. That’s being real without fantasy. I am not going to adhere what the world wants me to be. I am going to fight and struggle to what God Almighty wants me to be. Wealth has been created along with technology by millions of working people. The corporate plutocracy or oligarchy have usurped or taken the wealth from the people. Therefore, real people want to end corporate piracy. We defeated a lot of monarchy and feudalism in the world. We have the right to break up unjust corporate power and create a populist community. The concentration of wealth in the top 1 percent has caused a declining standard of living, so it is completely reasonable to have love & justice for all. Everyone deserves love. In spite of my mistakes and errors, there is nothing wrong with love, fruitful, joyous love.



The Occult World goes a long way in human history. Now, we have Prince Charles claiming that Vlad the impaler as an ancestor (or the Romanian warlord Vlad III. His father was Vlad II Dracul). Who was Vlad? Vlad is one person that’s related to many European Black Nobility bloodlines. Not only that. He lived from 1431 to 1476. He was the famous Prince of Wallachia. He is called Dracula. His father was a member of the Order of the Dragon (Dracul) and Dracula means son of the Dragon to indicate his father's title within the Order of the Dragon. He fought against the Ottoman Empire and its expansion, because the Ottoman Empire conquered the Balkans temporarily. He is known for impaling his enemies. Impaling means to torture and kill a person by using a long stake or long object placed inside of a human being (from the mouth to the other end of the human body). It’s a painful death that can sometimes take days. This torture is found in the four corners of the Earth from Egypt, Romania, the Americas, and to China. Vlad III was so cruel that he inspired Bram Stroker’s 1897 vampire novel called “Dracula.” Prince Charles is part of the Germanic House of Saxe-Coburg Gotha (now called Windsor) since the UK is made of many Germanic tribes today. Today, the New Age movement is supported by the same elite bloodlines not only to attack real spirituality, but to promote a false family tree (that claims to be related to Jesus when it’s not). Many of this brotherhood are in the FBI, CIA, law enforcement, and some high clergy are Freemasons worldwide, so this system is filled with Secret Society influence.

Assisted suicide is a threat in Canada. The case of Carter vs. Attorney General of Canada is bringing a constitutional challenge to Canada’s law that ban assisted suicide and euthanasia. The case wants to legalize these abhorrent actions. Last year, a bill in Parliament sought a similar result and it was defeated overwhelmingly. The plaintiffs include the family of Kay Carter. She was a British Columbia woman with significant disabilities. She died via assisted suicide in Switzerland in 2010. The case will be heard on Monday. The article deals with physician assisted suicide. Elderly abuse has been related to the assisted suicide. Legalization would also empower the Canadian health-care system to the detriment of individual patient rights. The Parliament defeated Bill C-384 that would of have legalized physician assisted suicide and euthanasia in Canada. This transpired in April 21, 2010. The vote was 228 and 59. Carter wanted to allow a medical practitioner or a person acting under the general supervision of a medical practitioner to assist a patient’s suicide. Carter said that as along as a doctor administers a suicide on a person, then it’s morally right. In the context of traditional medical treatment, “a person acting under the general supervision of a medical practitioner” would include a family member. An example would be an adult child who administers medication to a parent under the general supervision of a doctor who is not present. Typically, this would be in a home setting. Carter wants this policy since he feels that the term “grievously and irremediably ill” IS UNDEFEINED. He wants cancer and other diseases as qualified for the administration of assisted suicide. Oregon and Washington, assisted suicide is legal in America. Sound bite ballot initiative campaigns legalized it in both states. There is a similar ballot initiative as in a referendum in Canada. Now national law supports assisted suicide in America despite over 100 attempts.



People know the real history of Austrian economics. One of the promoters of it was Friedrich von Hayek. He was born in Vienna in 1899. He worked with the Austrian ideologue Ludwig von Mises in NYC. This philosophy was created by Carl Menger (1840-1921) as part of the power structure of Hapsburg and the Wittelbach royal houses of Austria & Bavaria. These royal houses opposed the Prussian industrialization policies that were modeled on the American system of development. Menger falsely equated the American system (Friedrich List) ideas with Marx, Hegel, and Henri St. Simon. Von Hayek devoted an entire chapter of The Counter-Revolution of Science to an attack against France's L'Ecole Polytechnique, and particularly against its two greatest figures, Gaspare Monge and Lazare Carnot. Von Hayek said that it’s fantasy or a metaphysical fashion that humans can harness and control forces of nature. Von Hayek didn’t believe in the truth that man was created in the image of God. Von Hayek supported the reactionary Mont Pelerin Society. Many early leaders of this group had links to the pro-Jesuit/Vatican Pan European movement. Count Coundenhove-Kalergi created the Pan-Europa Union (many pro-Hitler folks would support it). High level Freemason Hjamar Schacht supported the PEU. He was Hitler’s finance minister and the author of Hitler’s slave labor programs. The reactionary movement has the Fraser Insititute in Vancouver, Canada and the Manhattan Institute in NYC back in 1977. Today, the words about unbridled capitalism, no regulations, austerity, etc. can be greatly traced to Austrian economics, feudalism, and the monarchy basically. The enemy claims to just want to disagree with President Obama on political matters. Yet, why have they call this man every name in the book, slandered his beautiful wife, disrespected his children, and demonize his intelligence. I don’t agree with the President on every issues, but one thing is clear: He is informed about domestic and international issues.

The New Age Movement isn’t new at all. The new age tenets claim to want just peace, love, and universal brotherhood. Yet, all too often, the leaders of the New Age movement consists of a hatred of real Christians, a hatred of moral absolutes, and a sense of compromise with any dogma in the known Universe (in order to form their version of “balance”). Logic and reason is rejected by some New Agers since they believe in metaphysical concept in their daily functions. Now, the Aquarian Age is definitely a goal of this movement to merge religious concepts and nation-states into one specific, unified order. This order has bene called "the new world order" by truthseekers for years. This paranoia about 2012 is related to the New Age Movement as well. The 2012 hysteria is about a claim that the world will end or radically change by December 21, 2012. The Aquarian proponents believe that we will move from the Age of Pisces into Aquarius in order to evolve biologically & spiritually in order to become fully conscious entities. Freemasonry and the Theosophical Society invented much of the modern day New Age Movement via the Theosophical Society. Also, Jesuit Theilard de Chardin believed in the cosmic Christ (that satisfied all religions of the world) and he was one godfather of the New Age Movement as well. Alice Bailey even wanted world disarmament, a hatred of Christianity, and a Luciferic initiation (as many New Agers worship Lucifer not God). They use the cover of “peace” as an excuse to hide their real goads of anti-morality, and a rejection of a personal God (that is superior to man’s “self.” History proves that man’s heart is consistently wicked, who can know it. Just look at television or the events in the world to prove that). There is nothing wrong with peace, love, and hope, but you need discernment too. You have to accept the power of God not deny it. They show the form of godliness, but deny the power thereof as the prophet Paul said. The New Agers deny the real attributes of God. We don’t need an Utopian society that violates human rights. We just need human improvement and spiritual growth in accordance to God’s will. So, this movement is rather old and has been a part of the old, ancient Empires for thousands of years.


By Timothy

No comments:

Post a Comment