The Bilderbergers and more on Life

The Bilderberger Group meeting in 2012 is having more media coverage. Ironically, the mainstream media is nowhere in sight in reporting this very important news story. The Bilderberg Group has representatives of many of the major corporate & media organization in the world there. They are meeting in a hotel in Chantilly, Virginia, but the mainstream media isn't reporting on one of the most important stories going on in the world today. So, the Bilderberg has a huge relevance in our day and age. The policy debate will occur by many technological giants. Their names include the following people: Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google, Craig J. Mundie, Chief Research and Strategy Officer at Microsoft Corporation, and Reid Hoffman, Co-founder and Executive Chairman of LinkedIn. Another notable attendee is Peter Thiel, head of Clarium Capital, who provided the financial muscle for online ventures like Facebook and Paypal, as well as LinkedIn and Friendster. Peter Thiel once financially aided Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential campaign. These people are some of the biggest online and social media companies in the world. They are attending a secret weekend gateway. The mainstream media isn't reporting on these facts at all. Not to mention that the attendance of folks in the Bilderbergers include the Vice President of the European Commission, the Director General of the World Trade Organization, the President of the World Bank, and the Vice Chairman of the World Economic Forum (plus the White House National security Advisor, the Commander of USCYBERCOM, and the director of the National Security Agency). Heads of the World Bank, Royal Dutch Shell, Google, Microsoft, the NSA, the Washington Post, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Barclays, Airbus, BP, the White House’s National Security Advisor, Governors, and Senators are all at Bilderberg. Bilderbergers say that they only have speeches. If that is what they do, then why do the Bilderbergers execute mass secrecy and why do they execute the mass security apparatus to guard their meetings? People have the right to know exactly what transpires in that organization completely. The mainstream media won't cover this issue, because it will expose the fact that the corporate media is dominated & controlled by the establishment not by true populist individuals. Only 5 media companies control most of the media in America alone. Even Lawrence O'Donnell from MSNBC said that he's too lazy to research Bilderberg. Some protesters were handcuffed, because they are taking up close photos of Bilderberg members. We are Change documented the evidence of the Fairfax police arresting people for exercising their First Amendment rights. One of the activists taking photos is a veteran. Even during the last meeting in St. Moritz, Switzerland, the police took no action against photographers. The Washington Times reported yesterday that its photographer was told by police “…any attempt to get close to the building would result in arrest.” However, the activists in the clip didn’t get anywhere near the building and didn’t block traffic, they merely stepped off the pavement to get a closer shot. This new 2012 Bilderberg Group meeting is unprecedented, because there are machine gun nests and other intimidating tactics made to keep protesters and media away from the site of the meeting. It's wrong to see globalists stealing trillions of dollars of stolen taxpayer money. Daily Caller reporter Jamie Weinstein said that if the Bilderbergers are so powerful, why will they allow protesters to protest? The reason is that the tyranny is not always monolithic. Just because people may protest in some areas, doesn't mean we have no major issues of civil liberty violations, war crimes, economic inequality, and other problems in the world. Also, none of the public is allowed inside of the Bilderberg Group meetings except members of this nefarious group. So, the Bilderbergers aren't all Powerful like God is. Yet, the Bilderbergers are a serious international group with huge influence in how world policy is shaped. That's documented by a wide range of real sources. The mainstream media is ignoring this group and a war criminal like Henry Kissinger is allying with this globalization agenda too. 

I don't embrace the views of reactionaries and racists at all. We have to be knowledgeable about class issues in order to promote real revolutionary tenets in the world. Even after Third World nations received their independence, people then and now are fighting against economic exploitation by the former colonial powers. We should fight against the bourgeois order and allow the workers and all people to have their true liberation. It doesn't matter if exploitation wears a black face, a white one, or any other face. It's still wrong and it's still blatantly unjustifiable. We should have a dedication of social justice or a rectification of economic inequality and oppression. That means we that should express abhorrence of imperialist wars and believe in justice for poor human beings where ever they live in the world. We still have the threat of voting suppression. The deal is that some Republicans use the justification of voting fraud (which is very minuscule in real life, so it isn't a huge problem in America) as an excuse to promote harsh, restrict voter ID laws. They are using this to suppress the voting rights of minorities, the elderly, the poor, the young, and others. One person like even a WWII veteran had their voting rights violated because of certain rules in the Florida new voting law. This should stop since potentially millions of people can have their rights eliminated. Also, these laws prevent an adequate time to allow people to have access to voting. The Brennan Center for Justice as NYU holds that the new voting restriction laws could restrict access to the ballot to FIVE MILLION American citizens---mainly minorities, old people and the poor. These are the people least likely to vote for a reactionary agenda. The demographics of America is changing. There are more people of color born than white people being newly born in America. Most of the world includes people of color. Republicans know this, so they are trying to brainwash people to go along with their ideological agenda (and use nefarious voting laws at the same time). This national scale of the curtailing of our freedom is similar to the massive disfranchisement of citizens' voting rights in Florida during the 2000 election. Voting fraud occurred in Florida and this allowed George W. Bush to be selected as President via the Supreme Court. Therefore, if plutocracy ought to be defeated, then there should be a coalition of people from across the political spectrum in the 99% in order to defeat class oppression. We still live under a profit health care system and our problems ought to be rectified.

It's a fact that the United States spends more money and gets less on health care than any other industrialized nations. These facts are confirmed by a new report. The report came from the Commonwealth Fund. It examined health care spending along the 13 developed nations including America. The report mentioned that America spent nearly $8,000 per person in 2009. The researchers found that this higher level of spending doesn't correspond to a higher quality of care. They believe that this high spending relates to greater supply or a higher utilization of health care services. According to the study: "...There were 2.4 physicians per 100,000 population in the U.S. in 2009, fewer than in all the countries in the study except Japan. The U.S. also had the fewest doctor consultations (3.9 per capita) of any country except Sweden. Relative to the other countries in the study, the U.S also had few hospital beds, short lengths of stay for acute care, and few hospital discharges per 1,000 population. On the other hand, U.S. hospital stays were far more expensive than those in other countries—more than $18,000 per discharge. By comparison, the cost per discharge in Canada was about $13,000, while in Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, France, and Germany it was less than $10,000..." Some feel that we pay more prices for health care, because of our greater use of expensive technology (as a reason why there is high health spending in America). We have expensive prescription drugs and other expensive technologies like CT and MRI scans (than many other nations). According to the researchers, meanwhile, while the U.S. had the best survival rates for breast and colorectal cancer, the survival rate for cervical cancer was below average. The rate of asthma-related deaths among people aged 5 to 39 was also high, as were amputations for people with diabetes. That is why the health care reform law (despite its imperfections) encourages physicians to focus on quality rather than the quantity of care as a means to bring down health care costs. 

There is the controversy about gender specific abortions. This seems like a common sense issue. Gender based abortion is immoral. It should be banned if necessary in America even if this problem is very minuscule in America. Very few people have certain diseases. That doesn't mean that no federal funding should exist in order for society to find curses of rare diseases. This problem exists globally. Sex selective abortions are wrong The Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act or PRENDA would requireda doctor to deny abortions to people who engaged in gender discrimination. Abortion on demand never created a better society. In fact, there are more abortions now than ever before (even when pro-abortion activists claim that they want to lower abortion rates). Most Democrats voted against the bill. Sex selection abortion is very common in China and India. Yet, the Republicans are wrong in not at least trying to fight against sex discrimination as another means to battle against gender specific abortions. The Republicans also should make more of an effort to promote VAWA, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the Paycheck Fairness Act, or Health Equity and Accountability Act in order to fight against gender discrimination. Some people felt that Rep. Trent Franks made a stereotypical remark about Asian Americans. I don't think that he has malice intent, but he should clarify that this anti-gender based abortion agenda has nothing to do with agitating the Asian American community at all. It's about life and human decency without scapegoating an ethnic group. It's a shame in this day and age that the Democrats won't even support any bill that prevents gender based abortion (even if it is progressive to their taste). Tons of industrialized nations have banned a procedure that intentionally aborts a child based on it being a girl. America is the last so-called civilized nation on Earth that doesn't ban it. On issues of war, Democrats are just as regressive as Republicans. On issues of civil liberties, they are just as regressive as Republicans are. So, the Democrats have no justification to lecture anyone on tolerance when many of them support a policy that violates freedom of speech as found in the Fairness Doctrine and most of them support the war on terror. The Republicans aren't off the hook since they support war mongering and some of them love xenophobia as well. To oppose this quaint law, so that bloodletting and infanticide can continue is real in America. Most of the House voted in support of the ban.

There is a new generation of conservatives. Tara Wall is a conservative Republican working for the Mitt Romney Presidential campaign. In Romney's mind, this represents inclusiveness. Tara Wall is the senior communications adviser for Mitt Romney's campaign. Tara Wall was a former news cater and senior adviser to former President George W. Bush. She works as a conservative columnist and deputy editorial page editor for the Washington Times. Wall wants to convince people like me (who is a brother) that we need to vote for the Mormon Mitt Romney. The Mormon Mitt Romney is something else. Mrs. Wall desires to communicate her message to appeal to Americans that want to see changes to our economic condition. One problem is that massive obstructionism by the GOP in Congress prevented some necessary, comprehensive economic reform to transpire in America. Mitt Romney refuses to publicly disagree with Donald Trump's view that President Barack Obama wasn't born in America. Romney expressed anti-poor rhetoric before as well. Trump is a birther through and through. Romney won't repudiate the evil words from Trump since he wants that Klan demographic to vote for him. Tara Wall is a very accomplished person. I respect anyone as a human being. People have the right to believe in whatever political philosophy that they desire without ridicule or unfair marginalization. Yet, Wall should realize that Austrian economics and war mongering against Iran don't benefit us as a people or Americans at all. These ideas are Mitt Romney's goals among others. It took progressive effort to extend rights to minorities, women, and other groups of people. Romney refuse to expose the Drug War, the prison industrial complex, income inequality, the war on terror, the Bilderberg Group, and other real issues involving my community. Mia Love is a part of the new generation of conservatives. She lives in Utah. Of course she said that her father said to her to not take welfare or be a burden to society. This is code and we know what that coded language is all about. Now, people sacrificed during the civil rights movement, so people like Mia Love could reap the benefits of society today. Just because a person takes welfare, doesn't mean that person is a leech. So, we don't make it own our own as social Darwinists subscribe to. She claims that she didn't felt "accepted" until she moved into Utah despite being from Brooklyn. I know what that comment means. The truth is that real black people live in the urban and rural areas (you can be accepted in Brooklyn since Brooklyn has many progressive, real people. A subtle jab at blacks taking government assistance is very much ignorant thinking). We all have assistance in getting to our basic destination whether public or private. Mia Love said that it's not the government's responsibility to help society, but it's the people. The refutation of that assumption is that the people are made up of the government. The government is by and for the people, so the people and the government are inseparable. Too much small government means that people are going to lose their jobs. Yet, the conservatives are right that the government isn't perfect. Therefore, we have the right to criticize the government when it acts inappropriately and we have the right to call for reforms to improve the government as well. The government ought to be made accountable for its actions. Mia Love wants to get rid of the EPA. Mia Love should be respected for her accomplishments, but she needs to realize that even she had to get help even from the government to achieve her goals. Lt. Col. West is silly liar since he tries to demonize people that disagree with him as a communist or Marxist. Too many black conservatives can't speak about issues without belittling their own people (even in indirect, disgusting terms). I have more respect for Mia Love and Tara Wall than Lt. Col. West though, because at least with Mia Love and Tara Wall, you can have a basically tolerant discussion. With people like West and Jesse Lee Peterson, it's like talking to extremely brainwashed people. 




By Timothy