History

From http://web.archive.org/web/20081121010410/http://www.gordoncomstock.com/eberhart/Deceitful_Revisers.htm


http://web.archive.org/web/20080307051331/http://www.gordoncomstock.com/eberhart.html

TACKLING the TOUGH TOPICS

FACING AMERICANS TODAY!

Issue # 75 // January 20, 2006 // Editor: Darryl Eberhart

(Updated through: April 19, 2007)

“DECEITFUL REVISERS AND

EDITORS OF HISTORY”

NOTE: All emphasis throughout this newsletter, unless otherwise noted, is by the editor of “Tackling the Tough Topics (TTT)”.

WARNING: This TTT newsletter may seriously “disturb” some folks’ “comfort zones”; however, TRUTH is far more important than any of our comfort zones.

DEFINITIONS (Hopefully listed in alphabetical order):

“Center Party” (per Darryl Eberhart, Editor of TTT): “[Often seen in various books as ‘Centrum’ or ‘Zentrum’ Party]: The German Roman Catholic Center Party [in German: Zentrumspartei] was a powerful political party in Germany in the 19^th century and early 20^th century (especially in the 1920s and early 1930s). Its main power base was in predominantly Roman Catholic Bavaria [in southern Germany]. The German Roman Catholic Center Party’s endorsement of, and unanimous vote for, the Enabling Act of March 1933 was crucial, giving Adolf Hitler the 2/3s majority he needed to assume dictatorial powers in Germany.”

“Crusade” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition; 1974; first two meanings): “1. Any of the military expeditions which Christians [Ed. Note: to be more precise, Roman Catholics] undertook from the end of the 11^th [century] to the end of the 13^th century to recover the Holy Land from the Moslems. 2. Any church-sanctioned war or expedition like this.”

((Ed Comment to the preceding definition: The Papacy launched “holy” crusades against Bible-believing Christian groups, such as the Albigenses in southern France, and the Waldenses in southeastern France and northwest Italy.))

“Deceitful” (per Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language): (Meaning #1): “Tending to mislead, deceive or ensnare.”

“Editor” (per Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language): “[1.] A publisher; particularly, a person who superintends an impression [i.e., a single edition] of a book; the person who revises, corrects and prepares a book for publication… 2. One who superintends the publication of a newspaper.”

“Fascism” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition – second meaning): “A system of government characterized by rigid one-party dictatorship, forcible suppression of opposition, private economic enterprise under centralized governmental control, belligerent nationalism, racism, and militarism, etc.: first instituted in Italy in 1922.”

“Front” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition; 1974): (Meaning #15): “A person or group used to cover or obscure the activity or objectives of another controlling person or group.”

“Genocide” (per Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn, co-authors of The History and Sociology of GENOCIDE): “A form of one-sided mass killing in which a state or other authority [Ed. Note: such as a RELIGIOUS authority] intends to destroy a group, as that group and membership in it are defined by the perpetrator.” (The History and Sociology of GENOCIDE; 1990; Page 23)

“Genocide” (per Professor R. J. Rummel, author of Death by Government): “Among other things, the killing of people by a government because of their indelible group membership (race, ethnicity, religion, language).” (Death by Government; 1994; Page 31)

“Heretic” (per Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language): “1. A person under any religion, but particularly the Christian, who holds and teaches opinions repugnant to the established faith, or that which is made the standard of orthodoxy. In strictness, among Christians, a person who holds and avows religious opinions contrary to the doctrines of Scripture, the only rule of faith and practice. 2. Any one who maintains erroneous opinions.”

“Heretic” (per Darryl Eberhart, Editor of TTT): “As concerns historical Roman Catholic use of this term: A ‘label’ applied by the Papacy to anyone who dared in the past, or who dares today, to question either (1) papal authority, or (2) any of the unscriptural doctrines based solely upon ‘tradition’ that have been promulgated by the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, such as ‘transubstantiation’, ‘indulgences’, ‘papal infallibility’, ‘purgatory’, ‘worship of images’, ‘a celibate priesthood’, ‘auricular confession to a priest’, etc.”

“Holocaust” (per Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary; 1971): (a.) “A sacrifice consumed by fire”; (b.) “A thorough destruction esp. by fire.”

“Inquisition” (per Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language): (Meaning #4): “In some Catholic countries, a court or tribunal established for the examination and punishment of ‘heretics’. This court was established in the 12^th century by ‘father’ Dominic, who was charged by Pope Innocent III with orders to excite [Roman] Catholic princes [i.e., rulers] and people to extirpate [i.e., destroy completely] ‘heretics’.”

“Jesuit Order” (per Darryl Eberhart, Editor of TTT): “The Jesuit Order is a religious order of the Roman Catholic Church, officially approved by Pope Paul III in 1540. The primary goals of this order are (1) to roll back the Protestant Reformation and the freedoms that it brought to many of the inhabitants of this planet; (2) to enhance the power and prestige of the Papacy; and (3) to rule despotically over the governments of the world through the Papacy. The head of the Jesuit Order is the Jesuit Superior General – the ‘Black Pope’ – the real power behind the Papal throne. The Jesuit Order is infamous for fomenting revolutions and wars, assassinating heads of State, and subverting nations.”

“Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor” (per Eric Jon Phelps, author of Vatican Assassins): “Someone who performs service or duties for the Jesuit Order, but who is not a Jesuit priest. This person may be of any race, religion, or sex.”

“Knights of Malta” (per Darryl Eberhart, Editor of TTT): “A Roman Catholic religious-military order headquartered in Rome with, and under the command of, the Jesuit Superior General. Much of the wealth of the Knights Templar, when it was disbanded in 1312, was given to the Knights of Malta. Many Knights of Malta have held top-level positions in various governments, in the world’s foremost intelligence agencies, in international banking, and in the publishing world. A number of Knights of Malta continue to hold such positions.”

“Mass Murder” (per Darryl Eberhart, Editor of TTT): “The indiscriminate killing of any person or group of people by either a government, or by a religious institution – or, by a government AND a religious institution working hand-in-hand together to eliminate their perceived enemies.”

“Papal Rome” (per Darryl Eberhart, Editor of TTT): “The government of the Roman Catholic Church, whose headquarters is presently in Rome, Italy.”

“Red Herring” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition): (Meaning #2): “Something used to divert attention from the basic issue.”

“Revise” (per Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language): “1. To review; to re-examine; to look over with care for correction… 2. To review, alter and amend…”

“Reviser” (per Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language): “One that revises or re-examines for correction.”

“Revisionist” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary): “A person who revises, or favors the revision of, some accepted theory, doctrine, etc.”

“Scapegoat” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition): (Meaning #2): “A person, group, or thing upon whom the blame for the mistakes or crimes of others is thrust.”

“Smoke screen” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition): (Meaning #2): “Anything said or done to conceal or mislead.”

“Ustashi” – “Catholic Actionists” – The Roman Catholic militia (and later army) in the Roman Catholic Fascist State of Croatia during World War II.

“Vatican” (per Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition; 1974): “1. The papal palace, consisting of a group of buildings in Vatican City. 2. The papal government or authority.”

IMPORTANT NOTE #1: I (the editor of the ETI and TTT newsletters) am not a Roman Catholic; I also most definitely am not anti-Roman Catholic as far as individual Roman Catholics go. My dad and 90% of my relatives are Roman Catholic; and the majority of my friends are Roman Catholic. I am, however, against the top levels of secret societies (from the hierarchy of the Jesuit Order to the hierarchy of Freemasonry). This is because these secret societies control the leadership of the Roman Catholic Church (through the Jesuit Order and P2 Masonry), and have often used this hierarchical system for evil purposes, such as “holy” Inquisition, “holy” crusades, “holy” wars, and religious genocide. The hierarchical system of the Roman Catholic Church is used quite effectively by secret societies not only to keep over one billion Roman Catholics “in line”, but also to gather intelligence, and to infiltrate (through its Knights of Malta, Jesuit “temporal coadjutors”, etc.) governments and various Christian denominations. I am also against any religious hierarchy that tries to place itself equal to, or above, the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God – or equal to, or above, God’s Holy Word (i.e., the Holy Bible) and His Ten Commandments!

IMPORTANT NOTE #2: We can no longer afford to REMAIN SILENT on these critical issues for fear of offending any particular group – in this case, Roman Catholics. Please carefully consider this quote by author Dave Hunt:

“We are told to love one another as Christ has loved us. Pop psychology trivializes that command by equating it with a ‘positive’ attitude. Forgotten is the first duty of love: to speak the truth (Ephesians 4:15). Real love does not flatter or soothe when correction is needed but [rather] points out the error which is blinding and harming the loved one. Christ said, ‘As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten; be zealous, therefore, and repent’ (Revelation 3:19). Instead, the idea is now current that love excludes rebuke, ignores the truth, and seeks unity at any price. Only disaster can result.” (A Woman Rides the Beast; 1994; Page 403)

Why Am I Writing More & More About Roman Catholicism?

This editor of the ETI and TTT newsletters has been writing more and more about the Roman Catholic Church’s hierarchy (i.e., Papal Rome), and especially about the Jesuit Order, in recent newsletters because I keep uncovering more and more about the deep hatred that Papal Rome has for independent Bible-believing Christians, Protestants, Orthodox Christians, and Jews. We Americans have, for the most part, been largely ignorant of the well-documented history of Papal Rome in conducting brutal religious genocide (via Inquisition, “holy” wars, and “holy” crusades) against all the afore-mentioned groups. Sadly, many Americans believe the “ecumenical rhetoric” of Roman Catholic prelates – i.e., that Papal Rome has “changed her ways” and now loves all the “separated brethren”. However, my study of the Papacy shows me that this ecumenical rhetoric is just a RUSE [i.e., a “stratagem” – per Webster’s Dictionary: “any trick or scheme for achieving some purpose”]. The “purpose” is to bring all Christian denominations under the control of the Papacy!

Yes, the Papacy [i.e., Papal Rome], despite its “ecumenical rhetoric”, has not changed a bit over the many centuries in the following categories:

• Its deep hatred of Jews, all independent Bible-believing Christians, Protestants, and Orthodox Christians (as recently as the 1940s we find Roman Catholic Ustashi military units in Croatia, led and urged on by Franciscan priests, monks, and friars, slaughtering from 600,000 to one million innocent Serb Orthodox Christian men, women, elderly, and children – many of the victims being first brutally tortured);
• Its long-held dream to bring all Christians under its monopolistic, totalitarian, ecclesiastical control;
• Its long-held dream to head up a totalitarian one-world religious organization; and,
• Its long-held dream to bring all world leaders – especially those in “Christian” countries – under the temporal power of the pope. (That is, the Papacy would be the top player and “controller” in a one-world government – just like it was the top player and controller on the European continent for many centuries! Kings indeed bowed before popes.)

Power – absolute power – has long been the pursuit of Papal Rome. History has recorded Papal Rome’s deep hatred for religious liberty and freedom of conscience. The U.S. Constitution, with its “Bill of Rights” guaranteeing such liberties, has long been hated by Papal Rome. (For a good example of this hatred, please read the Syllabus of Errors issued in 1864 by Pope Pius IX.) I have heard that there is an acronym in use by some Knights of Columbus in America. This acronym is “M.A.C.”: “Make America Catholic”. America is the last “roadblock” in the way of Papal Rome and her globalist rich and power elite lackeys in their quest for one-world government and one-world religion. Is America scheduled for a religious genocide – an Inquisition – as occurred in the 1940s in Croatia? I believe the danger is real and possibly quite imminent – and that is why I have been writing more and more about Papal Rome, her long-held dreams of world domination, her love of Fascist regimes, and her well-documented history of torture and religious genocide!

HERE ARE SOME RELEVANT QUOTATIONS:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country… It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world…” (1928)

Edward Bernays (Called by some the “Father of Public Opinion”)

“For 300 years past the Church of Rome has striven by an unceasing torrent of false histories, pamphlets, and lectures to conceal from the nation [i.e., Great Britain] and the world the true face of her terrible history before and during the Reformation.”

Albert Close (Jesuit Plots from Elizabethan to Modern Times; Page 7)

“Surely some Jesuit hand must have been at work influencing ‘Lord’ Romilly [Ed. Note: the “Master of the Rolls” (who was in charge of State Papers) in England] when he appointed [in 1859] a Roman Catholic [William Barclay Turnbull] to edit the State Papers of the reigns of [King] Edward VI [king: 1547-53] and [Roman Catholic Queen] Mary [I; queen: 1553-58], above all others; and later to appoint the Rev. Joseph Stevenson as successor.”

Albert Close (Jesuit Plots from Elizabethan to Modern Times; Page 9)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: Joseph Stevenson later “became” a Jesuit in 1882. Was it just a “coincidence” that he had earlier been appointed to edit British history at the office of the “Master of the Rolls”? Has American history similarly been edited to remove any evidence of Papal and Jesuit wrongdoing in the USA? Yes! American history has been meticulously edited!))

“The greatest danger and damage to true British history today lies in the almost criminal folly of the [British] Government appointing Roman Catholics and Anglo-Romanists to edit the Official Calendars of State Papers from the original Manuscripts of the Reformation times.

By clever maneuvering, Rome [i.e., the Vatican – the Papacy] has succeeded in the past in getting Roman Catholic Calendarers on the Staff of the Master of the Rolls, with the result that Vatican Documents and other old State Papers have either been suppressed in our National Calendars of State Papers or edited in favor of the Church of Rome.”

Albert Close (Jesuit Plots from Elizabethan to Modern Times; Page 8)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: I do not know if I would use the word “folly” in the first sentence of the preceding quotation. Powerful people in the British government knew exactly what they were doing. Papal Rome has for centuries instructed her “agents” (e.g., Jesuits, Jesuit “temporal coadjutors”, Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, etc.) to infiltrate governments, religious denominations, intelligence agencies, universities and colleges, school board committees, publishing houses, etc., in a carefully planned and orchestrated effort to “erase”, as much as possible, Papal Rome’s history of religious genocide and persecution, of fomenting revolutions and wars, of assassinating heads of State, and of torture and Inquisition – and also to “rewrite and revise” history textbooks and encyclopedias. This effort has been immensely successful.))

“There can be no shadow of doubt that the Jesuits and the Anglo-Romanist party in Britain have gained great influence over the Cable Services, Press Agencies, B.B.C., and chief newspapers of Great Britain…”

Albert Close (Jesuit Plots from Elizabethan to Modern Times; Page 169)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: The same thing [i.e., a Jesuit takeover of the press, media, and publishing industry] has also happened here in the USA!))

“There is no doubt that the American [Roman] Catholic hierarchy has entered the political arena, and that it is becoming more and more aggressive in extending the frontiers of [Roman] Catholic authority into the fields of medicine, education, and foreign policy… As we shall see in this book [Ed. Note: American Freedom and Catholic Power], the [Roman] Catholic hierarchy in this country [i.e., the USA] has great power as a pressure group, and no editor, politician, publisher, merchant or motion-picture producer can express defiance openly – or publicize documented facts – without risking his future.”

Paul Blanchard (Journalist and author) (1949; Quote was taken from his book American Freedom and Catholic Power.)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: This quote was made in 1949. The power of the Roman Catholic hierarchy in the USA has not diminished from that time, but rather has grown. Many powerful Knights of Malta (controlled by the Roman Catholic Jesuit Order) have held key positions in America’s mainstream media (e.g., Henry Robinson Luce and William Randolph Hearst), in U.S. intelligence agencies (e.g., CIA Directors William Donovan, John McCone, William Casey, William Colby, and George Tenet), in U.S. banking, in the U.S. government, etc. Top-level Knights of Columbus (e.g., Senator Ted Kennedy) have held, and continue to hold, key positions in the U.S. government. Many of these men do NOT have the best interests of the American people at heart – rather, they serve the interests of the Vatican and the Jesuit Order. These men share the goals of the Vatican and the Jesuit Order for one-world government and one-world religion controlled by the Papacy! Of course, the real power behind the papal throne is the Jesuit Superior General – the Black Pope!))

“In March 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests [Ed. Note: controlled by the Rockefellers]…got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the U.S. and [a] sufficient number of them to CONTROL generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process to retain only those necessary for the purpose of CONTROLLING. They found it was necessary to purchase CONTROL of 25 of the greatest [news] papers. The 25 [news] papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly SUPERVISE and EDIT information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the INTERESTS of the PURCHASERS… This policy also included the SUPPRESSION of everything in opposition to the wishes of the INTERESTS SERVED.” – Oscar Callaway (U.S. Congressman) (Statement placed in the Congressional Record in 1917)

“There is probably no important magazine or newspaper in the country [Ed. Note: the USA] that is not COMMUNIST-penetrated to some degree.”

Whittaker Chambers (1901-1961; American journalist; ex-member of the Communist Party of the United States)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: For whom do the Communists work? Author Gary Allen tells us: “The Rockefeller family, through their Chase Manhattan Bank and other entities, have been great benefactors of the Soviet Union ever since [the] Communist Revolution in Russia.” Which brings us to these questions: For whom do the Rockefellers work? Do they have any connections to the Rothschilds, who hold the title “Guardians of the Vatican Treasury”?))

“I questioned Dr. [Alberto] Rivera about the briefings he received in the Vatican when he was a Jesuit priest. I asked him if he was briefed on how the Vatican planned to take over the United States. He told me [that] his indoctrination [i.e., his training as a Jesuit] went back [into American history] to the time of the Pilgrims. Because of the knowledge of the Inquisition and the slaughter of Christians by the Roman Catholic system, the early immigrants in America began passing laws to keep Jesuits out of this country and to outlaw the mass…to protect themselves from a Vatican takeover. These were Christian communities deeply concerned about the ‘whore of Revelation’ [i.e., the “whore” described in the book of Revelation in the Holy Bible].

Jesuits began arriving in America as early as the second group of Pilgrims. They used different names with identifications. They were followed years later when the Vatican sent multitudes of [Roman] Catholic families from England, Ireland, and France – posing as Protestants – into the colonies. These were ‘plants’. They were holding secret masses in defiance of the laws. In those days, no Roman Catholic was to hold any position in civil government. The Jesuits made sure this part of our history was erased and removed.

The next major move by the Jesuits was to destroy or control all the Christian schools across America. Throughout the years, Jesuits, working undercover, have gotten into special committees on school boards to remove the emphasis of the Bible and replace it with psychology as found in the Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius de Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit Society. Later, Catholic schools and universities sprang up all across the nation under the Jesuits. Today, they probably outnumber all the Christian schools and colleges put together.

The third stage was to move into the courts and legislation…to take over as judges and lawyers in order to manipulate the Constitution in their favor until it could be changed. Once this was accomplished, the thrust was into politics to capture the political parties. Then [the Jesuits moved on to] the military and the newspapers. Even back in the time of Lincoln over half the newspapers in the United States were controlled by the Vatican.”

Jack Chick (Smokescreens; 1983; Pages 75, 76)

((Ed. Comments to the preceding quote:

(1) If you have any doubts about the above claims by Jack Chick concerning the tremendous power and influence of Papal Rome and the Jesuit Order, then you need to check out the following books: Smokescreens by Jack Chick, A Woman Rides the Beast by Dave Hunt, The Secret History of the Jesuits by Edmond Paris, 50 Years in the Church of Rome by Charles Chiniquy, and Is Alberto for Real? (compiled by Sidney Hunter). These books can all be ordered via credit card by calling Chick Publications at 1-909-987-0771.

(2) If you have any doubts about Papal Rome’s heavy-duty takeover of much of America’s newspapers, magazines, etc., then please do some research on William Randolph Hearst and Henry Robinson Luce. Both of these men were Jesuit-controlled Knights of Malta.

(3) Jack Chick says that Papal Rome controlled half of the [major] newspapers in the USA back in the time of President Lincoln! What percentage of the U.S. mainstream media and press does Papal Rome now control?))

“In 1997, wealthy media mogul Rupert Murdoch received papal knighthood for promoting the [Roman] Catholic Church and the pope’s interests. …This Roman Catholic [Bible] version [Ed. Note: the author is referring to the New International Version] is Rupert’s bestseller! Let’s face it: Roman Catholic [Bible] versions have become big business.” – David W. Daniels (Did The Catholic Church Give Us The Bible?; 2005; Page 125)

((Ed. Comments to the preceding quote: (1) Per author David W. Daniels: “Bibles based on the perverted Alexandrian/Roman Catholic texts are in reality Roman Catholic Bibles – with or without the Apocrypha.” (2) As already mentioned, a number of wealthy Knights of Malta (a Roman Catholic religious-military order that is headquartered with, and controlled by, the Jesuit Superior General) have been major players in the publishing business, such as Henry Robinson Luce and William Randolph Hearst.))

I. INTRODUCTION

I love history – that is, I love TRUE history. Sadly, a whole lot of important history – history that should be known by the American people – has disappeared down a very deep “memory hole”. And even more history is headed for that deep “memory hole”. This history that has disappeared – or is in the process of disappearing – is true history that is very unfavorable to Papal Rome and the Jesuit Order. It is bloody, ugly, and dark history – history that Papal Rome and the Jesuit Order are working overtime to destroy forever. It is history that Papal Rome and the Jesuit Order want the American people to forget – or, in the case of many Americans, to never learn. It is the well-documented history of Papal Rome and the Jesuit Order in the following categories:

• Mass murder (frequent religious genocide, often on a massive scale – e.g., the slaughter of Jews; the slaughter of Orthodox Christians; the slaughter of independent Christian groups such as the Albigenses and the Waldenses; the slaughter of Protestant Christians in Ireland and Bohemia; the slaughter of the Protestant French Huguenots; etc.);
• Mass torture of human beings (via “holy” Inquisition);
• The assassination of heads of State (e.g., President Abraham Lincoln, Tsar Alexander I and Tsar Alexander II of Russia, King Henry III and King Henry IV of France, President Benito Pablo Juarez of Mexico, etc.);
• Meddling in the affairs of State in numerous nations;
• Fomenting and orchestrating bloody revolutions and wars (including two world wars); and,
• Hating religious liberty, freedom of conscience, and popular, representative government.

Cui bono? That is, “who benefits” from this disappearing history that we Americans should learn if we are to have any chance of countering Papal Rome’s efforts to destroy our liberties and our Constitutional Republic?

Some folks allege that “the Jews” run America’s publishing houses, its mainstream media, etc. If this were true, then why would these “Jews” be aiding and abetting Papal Rome and the Jesuit Order by covering up their numerous crimes against humanity (e.g., “holy” crusades, “holy” wars, the “holy” Inquisition, and religious genocide)? After all, the Jews have suffered horribly at the hands of Papal Rome! Inquiring minds surely would like to know!

I would like to cover some historical events here in this issue of TTT that I have covered in previous newsletters – albeit more briefly here, but with some new data wherever possible – especially some new quotations. I ask those of you who have read some of my previous newsletters to “stay with me” as I cover these pieces of “disappearing history”, even though I will be repeating some information here that has appeared in earlier newsletters.

History is indeed important. While the dates, names of the leading players, and locations change, the basic scenarios of tyranny, oppression, manipulated wars, etc., keep repeating “over and over again”. We should never forget these wise words from the Spanish philosopher George Santayana: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

In a previous TTT newsletter, entitled “The Real Controllers of the USA”, I talked about “front groups”, “red herrings”, and “smoke screens” that the real powers operating “behind the scenes” [i.e., Papal Rome and the Jesuit Order] use to mislead us not only about history, but also about what is really happening today in our American Constitutional Republic. Revising and editing history – or, flushing parts of it down that deep “memory hole” – is a key component of their carefully planned strategy of deceit and control. And one of the greatest tools in their hands is a group of people whom I call “the deceitful revisers and editors of history”. These “revisers” and “editors” of history have been very successful in their dirty work of erasing those segments of true history that reveal Papal Rome’s bloody and sinister past. These deceitful agents of Papal Rome can be found on school board committees, in publishing houses, and in many institutes of higher learning. They are the editors of many top newspapers and newsmagazines. They write articles for history textbooks and for encyclopedias. They have infiltrated every important strata of our society. They have destroyed, and are in the process of destroying, many important segments of American history, European history, world history, and “Church” history – history that we Americans need to know if we are to have any chance of preserving our liberties!

II. IMPORTANT EXAMPLES OF REVISED HISTORY (segments of history that are rapidly disappearing down a very deep “memory hole”)

A. Vicious Papal Religious Genocide Against the Albigensian and Waldensian Christians (who were called “heretics” by Papal Rome)

“The [Roman] Catholic Church has the right and duty to kill heretics because it is by fire and sword that heresy can be extirpated.”

Marianus de Luce (Jesuit; 1901)

So few Americans are aware of Papal Rome’s horrible persecution of Christian groups in the 12^th through 16^th centuries – much of it occurring long before the term “Protestants” ever came into being. Various popes ordered Roman Catholic monarchs to send army after army against the Christian Albigenses in southern France, and against the Christian Waldenses in France and in northern Italy – against innocent farmers and peasants who were peaceful, moral people.

Here are just a few quotes dealing with Papal Rome’s horrible religious genocide against these innocent Christian men, women, elderly, and children:

“The Albigensian Crusades slash through the history of France and of the [Roman Catholic] Church like a gaping wound. From 1208 to 1226 the papacy sent army after army to the South of France to crush the Albigensian ‘heretics’ and to punish their supporters. …They [i.e., the Albigensian Crusades] began with a calculated act of terror, the massacre of [Ed. Note: large numbers of innocent men, women, and children at] Beziers; they ended with the establishment of the Inquisition, one of the most effective means of ‘thought control’ that Europe has ever known. ((Ed. Comment: The papal army butchered about 20,000 citizens of this French city populated then mainly by the Albigenses.)) They [the papal armies] were completely successful: The losing faith, the Albigensian ‘Heresy’, was exterminated.

…Their disappearance as a social group was carefully planned and executed with persistent cruelty.” – Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn (Co-authors of The History and Sociology of GENOCIDE; 1990; Page 115)

((Ed. Comment: The extermination of the Albigensian Christians by Papal Rome is a clear example of RELIGIOUS genocide – religicide!))

“[The Albigensian Christians] preached against the immoralities of the [Roman Catholic] priesthood, pilgrimages, worship of saints and idols…opposed the claims of the Church of Rome; made great use of the Scriptures.

…By 1167 they [i.e., the Albigensian Christians] embraced possibly a majority of the population of South France.

…In 1208 a crusade was ordered by Pope Innocent III; a bloody war of extermination followed, scarcely paralleled in history. Town after town was put to the sword, and the inhabitants murdered without distinction of age or sex.

…Within a hundred years the Albigenses were utterly rooted out.”

Dr. Henry H. Halley (Halley’s Bible Handbook)

“These religious crusades [ordered by Papal Rome] and [accompanying] genocide (frequently in the form of State-Church genocide) were often directed at innocent peasants and farmers (e.g., Albigenses, Waldenses, French Huguenots, etc.) whose only ‘crimes’ were placing the Bible in higher authority than the pope, and refusing to recognize papal authority. These innocent people were falsely called ‘heretics’ [by Papal Rome]. Papal armies were raised (often using murderers, rapists, etc., who had been released from prisons) and sent to exterminate entire villages and regions.”

Darryl Eberhart (Editor of “Tackling the Tough Topics”; July 13, 2005)

The Roman Catholic Church claims to be “Christian”, yet has tortured and butchered Christians who disagreed with papal authority and/or doctrine. Mass murder by Papal Rome didn’t just occur in the 12^th through the 16^th centuries – it occurred as recently as the 1940s in Fascist Croatia, where Roman Catholic Ustashi military units, led by Roman Catholic clergymen, tortured and murdered from 600,000 to one million innocent Serb Orthodox Christians.

Why isn’t this history taught to American schoolchildren? Who benefits by this history being kept from the American people, and who is so powerful in this country that they have, for the most part, been able to keep this history from the majority of the American people?

B. The Inquisition and Brutal Torture

Author David W. Daniels gives us a brief “history” of the Inquisition in his book Did The Catholic Church Give Us The Bible? (2005):

“THE INQUISITION: The Horror Begins – With each council the level of terror increased:

• 1184 – Synod of Verona: Burn heretics at the stake.
• 1215 – 4^th Lateran Council: Burn heretics and take their property. The ‘Inquisition’ is formed.
• 1220 – Inquisition is handed to the newly formed Dominican Order.
• 1229 – Synod of Toulouse makes the Inquisition a systematic process – [Accused victims are] guilty until proven innocent!
• 1252 – Pope Innocent IV: Torture is doctrinally acceptable to make an accused heretic ‘confess’.
• 1484 – Pope Innocent VIII publishes ‘Summus Desiderantes’ to support his inquisitors.
• 1486 – [Pope] Innocent VIII publishes ‘Malleus Maleficorum’ (Witch-Hammer), the systematic guide to detect, torture and execute a suspected ‘witch’. But the deck was stacked against you:

1. Almost never see your accuser.

2. Never know why or of what you are accused.

3. No lawyer. You have to prove your innocence.

4. You’re presumed guilty – period.

5. They promise anything, but kill you anyway!” (Page 86)

If the brutal Inquisition were something that only existed a thousand years ago, then there would be no need to discuss it here. However, the “holy” office of Inquisition STILL exists – it has never disappeared. Oh yes, because of the “bad press” that it has received in the past, the Vatican has made two “name changes”.

F. Tupper Saussy, in his book Rulers of Evil, points out these two name changes: “Pontifex Maximus has laundered the Inquisition’s name twice. In 1908, Pope Pius X renamed it ‘the Holy Office’, which [Pope] Paul VI transformed into [the] ‘Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’ in 1965.” (1999; Page 304)

The office of Inquisition was set up in the 12^th century. Initially, the Dominicans were in charge of it. Later, the Jesuit Order would take the office of Inquisition from the Dominicans.

I will not name the encyclopedia here, but I did read in it, under the entry entitled “Inquisition”, a typical whitewash of this sick, barbaric, and inhuman institution (called the “holy” Inquisition). Whoever wrote the article for this “entry” in this encyclopedia didn’t consider the “Inquisition” a very big deal, saying that they didn’t use any worse torture than was used elsewhere in Europe at that time. The Roman Catholic Church refined “torture” to a new level, even bringing in medical doctors to ensure that most torture victims didn’t die while under torture. This was done so that the victims could be “revived and refreshed”, and thus could face days – weeks – and even months of more and more torture.

How can the Roman Catholic Church call herself “Christian” and yet command the most brutal torture of human beings – even of Christians who simply disagreed with papal doctrine and/or authority? How is it that the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church never seemed to have any problems finding lots of fiends to perform torture, and priests [who claim to represent Christ] to oversee that brutal torture of human beings? Where do we find the Lord Jesus Christ anywhere in this type of ungodly, sick, and barbarous activity? Oh, by the way, the Roman Catholic Church has never repudiated her “right” to use torture and force wherever and whenever she finds the opportunity to do so!

Here are some more quotes dealing with torture and “holy” Inquisition:

“To wring out confessions from these poor creatures [Ed. Note: during the various Inquisitions], the Roman Catholic Church devised ingenious tortures so excruciating and barbarous that one is sickened by their recital.”

Dave Hunt (A Woman Rides the Beast; 1994; Page 80)

“It is so very hard today to imagine how anyone could watch and inflict systematic tortures [as occurred during the “Holy” Inquisition] designed to bring its victims the most severe and agonizing pain, to the very point of death, yet denying death, and then start the process all over again – even on an animal, much less another human being.”

John Daniel (The Grand Design Exposed; 1999; Page 13)

“The most ghastly abomination of all was the system of torture. The accounts of its cold-blooded operations make one shutter at the capacity of human beings for cruelty. And it was decreed and regulated by the popes who ‘claim’ to represent Christ on earth…” – William Shaw Kerr (Church historian)

“What has turned my soul against Roman [Catholic] abuse of power is the way in which it has tortured and burned such saints of God as Joan of Arc, hundreds of the Albigensian martyrs in France in the 12^th century, the Knights Templar, John Huss [Czech Jan Hus], the Dominican Savonarola, the Dominican Giordano Bruno, [and] the Anglican bishops Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer. The Inquisition has promoted at least two wholesale massacres: [hundreds of] thousands of Protestant Waldensians in northern Italy [and southeastern France], and thousands of Protestant Huguenots by the massacre of St. Bartholomew in France. More than 30,000 of the most cultured Protestants of France were put to the sword on the night of St. Bartholomew, August 24, 1572. At the news [of this brutal, bloody massacre], the Pope had cannons fired, proclaimed a jubilee, ordered a Te Deum of thanksgiving to be sung, and struck a special medal to commemorate the glorious ‘victory’.” – Charles A. Bolton (Ex-Catholic priest)

“Of eighty popes in a line from the thirteenth century on, not one of them disapproved of the theology and apparatus of Inquisition. On the contrary, one after another added his own cruel touches to the workings of this deadly machine.” – Peter de Rosa (Catholic historian & former Jesuit; Vicars of Christ: The Dark Side of the Papacy)

“When confronted with ‘heresy’, she [i.e., Papal Rome] does not content herself with persuasion; arguments of an intellectual and moral order appear to her insufficient, and she has recourse to force, to corporal punishment, [and] to torture.” – H.M.A. Baudrillart (Rector of the Catholic Institute of Paris)

“[The Inquisition’s] methods of terror and persecution have been used and abused up to the present day. These methods were not only new, but also so successful that they have been copied by totalitarian regimes ever since. The main features of these methods are:

1. Making the denunciation of fellow citizens an obligation that takes precedence over ties of family and kinship;

2. Extracting confessions by imprisonment and torture;

3. Making the naming of fellow conspirators an essential part of confessions;

4. Defining the retraction of extorted confessions as a ‘relapse’ and therefore a proof of guilt; and,

5. In some cases, separating the proof of ‘heresy’ or opposition from the execution of the penalty. The Inquisition handed over its convicted ‘heretics’ to the secular arm for punishment just as, hundreds of years later, during Stalin’s purges of the Communist party, party members were often deprived of their membership and then handed over to the NKVD for punishment.”

Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn (Co-authors of The History and Sociology of GENOCIDE; 1990; Pages 114, 115)

Why isn’t this history concerning Papal Rome’s fiendish “Inquisitional” institution of brutal torture (that still exists) taught to American schoolchildren? Shouldn’t the American people be warned about this institution of torture, and the political-religious-financial institution that operates it? Who benefits by this history being kept from the American people, and who is so powerful in the USA that they have, for the most part, been able to keep this history from most Americans? Certain elements within the CIA love torture! The CIA has had a number of Knights of Malta (a Jesuit-controlled Roman Catholic religious-military order) at its head: William Donovan, John McCone, William Casey, William Colby, and George Tenet. What agencies in the U.S. government and military have taught “torture” to their corresponding elements in Latin American countries? Could there possibly be any connection between those torture-loving elements within the CIA and that religious-political-financial institution (i.e., Papal Rome) that loves to use torture?

C. The Council of Trent (1545-1563) and the Counter-Reformation

Here are two quotes by F. Tupper Saussy (from his book Rulers of Evil):

“Most of the eighteen-year lifetime of the Council of Trent [in Italy, 1545-1563] consisted of two intermissions spanning four and ten years each. At the beginning of the second intermission, Ignatius [of Loyola – founder of the Jesuit Order] founded a special college in Rome [in 1552] for German-speaking Jesuits called the Germanicum. ((Ed. Note: Pope Pius XI would later create the Russian college in Rome, and place it under the Jesuit Order.)) Three years later [in 1555], the Peace of Augsburg established the principle of ‘cuius regio, eius religio’, ‘whose [i.e., the ruler’s] the region, his the religion’. The Peace of Augsburg was Jesuit ‘pay dirt’. They could now bring whole populations to Rome simply by winning over a few princes. And so they did. By 1560, the Society [of Jesus – i.e., the Jesuit Order] had returned virtually all of South Germany and Austria to the [Roman Catholic] Church.” (Rulers of Evil; 1999; Page 56)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: The Jesuits steered the direction of the Council of Trent. Indeed, the Jesuit Order was founded primarily to counter, and if possible, destroy the Protestant Reformation. Much of Europe was starting to “go Protestant”, and the Roman Catholic Church was losing entire regions and provinces to Protestantism. The “Peace of Augsburg” in 1555 enabled the Jesuit Order to simply win over some key European princes and thus bring whole regions and provinces back to Roman Catholicism. But even this was not enough to stem the steady erosion of Roman Catholic “faithful” leaving mother church, and so religious genocide, “holy” Inquisition, and religious wars (such as the Thirty Years’ War of 1618-1648) were launched to exterminate as many Protestants as quickly as possible.))

“The fruits of the Germanicum [i.e., the special college in Rome for German-speaking Jesuits] were so successful that when the Council of Trent finally adjourned on December 4, 1563, its decrees and canons conceded nothing to the Protestant reformers. Indeed, under the spiritual direction of [Jesuit] Superior General Diego Lainez – Ignatius [of Loyola] had died in 1556 – the Council [of Trent] denied every Protestant doctrine point by point. Anathematized (eternally damned) was anyone who believed that salvation is God’s free gift to His faithful and does not depend upon partaking of Church sacraments. Anathematized was anyone who looked to the Bible for the ultimate authority on ‘doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness’ rather than to the teaching Church. Anathematized was anyone who regarded as unworthy of belief such unscriptural doctrines as (1) the efficacy of papal indulgences; (2) of confession alone to a priest as necessary for salvation; (3) of the mass as a true and real sacrifice of the body of Christ necessary to salvation; (4) the legitimacy of teachings on purgatory; (5) the celibate priesthood; (6) invoking saints by prayer to intercede with God; (7) the veneration of relics; and, (8) the use of images and symbols.

The Council of Trent hurled one hundred twenty-five anathemas – eternal damnations – against Protestantism.” (Rulers of Evil; 1999; Pages 56, 57)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: These vicious, unwarranted anathemas – eternal damnations – have never been revoked. Subsequent Councils have reaffirmed the Council of Trent. The Vatican, despite “ecumenical rhetoric” to the contrary, has not changed the basic doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church that sent MILLIONS of innocent men, women, elderly, and children to their deaths during numerous religious genocides, long periods of “holy” Inquisition, and actual “holy” Crusades and wars launched against Christians!))

D. Attempts to Force England Back Under Papal Authority

We can see from the quotes at the beginning of this newsletter that Papal Rome made mighty efforts to bring England back under papal authority, especially in the 16^th century.

Here are some more quotes about this “chapter of history” that is relatively unknown to many Americans:

“Eight years before the attempted [Spanish] Armada invasion [of 1588], Jesuits were seditiously active plotting the overthrow of the English government. By using different disguises, aliases, and secret codes, to illegally slip in and out of England, Jesuit Robert Parson, in 1580, had led and then later organized a mission to bring other Jesuits into England to engage in a work of subversion. When the [attempted] invasion [by the Spanish Armada] failed, these masters of intrigue [i.e., the Jesuits] turned to another bizarre scheme. Known in your encyclopedia under the subject, ‘The Gunpowder Plot’ – thirteen [Roman] Catholic noblemen and five Jesuits formed a conspiracy devising a plan to explode 36 barrels of gunpowder in the cellar of the House of Lords and kill King James I, and members of the [House of] Commons as they assembled for the opening of Parliament on 5 November 1605. Their plan was to blow up the Parliament building and out of the chaos incite the people into a full insurrection.

…But before the date it [i.e., the cellar full of explosives] was to be detonated, the explosives were discovered, leading to the arrest of all those involved. …Of the five Jesuits involved, two escaped, one died in prison, and two were convicted and executed.”

John Daniel (The Grand Design Exposed; 1999; Pages 76, 77)

((Ed. Comments to the preceding quote:

(1) Most of our encyclopedias and history textbooks do NOT tell us that the purpose of the attempted invasion of England in 1588 by the Spanish Armada was to land troops in England to be joined by local Roman Catholics in an effort to overthrow the government and bring England, by force, back under the authority of Papal Rome! The Roman Catholic King of Spain (Philip II) wanted financial “compensation” for launching this invasion. And so the Roman pontiff, Pope Sixtus V, promised King Philip II 200,000 crowns as soon as the Spanish Armada had set sail for England, and more cash to follow later. Thus the Papacy was helping to fund the planned invasion of England!

(2) What occurred in England, i.e., the numerous political intrigues, attempted assassinations of heads of State, etc., by the wily Jesuit Order, occurred all over continental Europe too. This was the reason why 83 countries, cities, and city-states had thrown the Jesuits out of their areas by 1931! Many European monarchs who expelled the Jesuits were Roman Catholics themselves!))

((Ed. Note: The following quotation is an excerpt taken from an information sheet I recently typed up concerning Albert Close’s excellent book Jesuit Plots from Elizabethan to Modern Times.)):

“Editor of ETI and TTT has come to the following conclusion after studying the history of the Roman Catholic Church and Europe: It is virtually impossible to clearly understand European history from the 16^th century to the present time without ‘viewing’ it through the ‘lens’ of (1) the ‘Reformation-Counter Reformation’, (2) Roman Catholic efforts to bring England back under papal authority, and (3) the Jesuit Order. The famous Frenchman, the Marquis de LaFayette, stated: ‘It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country – the United States of America – are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars of Europe.’ Many other famous individuals, such as President John Adams, echoed similar condemnations of this infamous Society of Jesus (a.k.a. the Jesuit Order)!

Papal Rome (and especially the Jesuit Order from the mid 1500s) tried to bring England back under papal authority by force and subversion. A number of popes and European monarchs conspired to assassinate British monarchs, to foment revolutions in the British Isles, and to actually land foreign troops on British soil. These attempts to bring England back under the pope’s authority by force reached their zenith in 1588 when the 130-ship Spanish Armada, carrying 20,000 troops, sailed for the British Isles. Pope Sixtus V had promised Spanish King Phillip II 200,000 crowns the moment the armada sailed, and another 100,000 crowns when troops were placed on shore in England. Researchers have examined British, French, and Spanish ‘State papers’ – and Vatican documents, for this era. These State papers and Vatican documents clearly show Papal Rome’s involvement not only in the planned invasion of England by the Spanish Armada, but also in numerous attempts to assassinate Queen Elizabeth I.