Pro-Life Manna

PRO-ABORTION ARGUMENT:
"The fetus may be alive, but so are eggs and sperm. The fetus is a potential human being, not an actual one; it's like a blueprint not a house, an acorn not an oak tree."



PRO-LIFE ANSWER: Part 5
Even if the analogy were valid, scientifically speaking an acorn is simply a little oak tree, just as an embryo is a little person.

Despite the dehumanizing elements of the acorn-oak analogy, those who understand what an acorn is will realize that, ironically, the analogy serves the opposite purpose for which it is intended!

Blueprints are not houses, nor do they become houses no matter how long we care to wait, because by nature they are something else. But while the blueprint in no sense becomes the house, the acorn does become the oak tree. It can do so only because in the most basic sense it is the oak tree!

While no house was ever a blueprint, every oak tree was once an acorn. So it is with the person--a person doesn't simply come from an embryo or fetus. A person was an embryo, then a fetus. As every oak tree was an acorn, every person was once a fertilized egg.

All the oak tree is or ever will be was in the acorn. If the acorn were destroyed, there would be no oak tree. Likewise, all that the adult is or ever will be was in the embryo. If the embryo were destroyed, there would be no baby, no teenager, and no adult. When the baby dies the teenager dies. When the embryo dies, the baby dies. Abortion doesn't kill potential people. It kills actual people.



_______________________

http://lifenews.com/state4330.html

From http://lifenews.com/state4331.html


Congressional Health Care Bill Could Trump Missouri Law Against Abortion Funding

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 7, 2009

addthis_pub = 'sertelt';

Email RSS Print
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- When it comes to the health care bills in Congress and the issue of abortion funding, the bills could have federal taxpayer dollars paying for abortions. But, as one Missouri pro-life advocate tells LifeNews.com, the health care bill could also trump state laws that prevent abortion funding.
Since 1983, Missouri has had a state law preventing abortion coverage in health insurance plans except to prevent the death of the mother.
The state only allows coverage for elective abortions when the insured person purchases an optional rider that requires an additional premium payment.
As Sam Lee, the head of Campaign Life Missouri, tells LifeNews.com, "This measure, of course, protects pro-life health insurance consumers in the state who are not forced to subsidize abortion coverage for other insured individuals in the health care plan."
Despite a legal challenge from abortion advocates, .S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld the state statute in the 1992 case Coe v. Melahn.
But it may face a greater challenge in the form of the government-run health care bills pending in Congress.
Douglas Johnson, the legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, explains how.
"H.R. 3200 is clear that the federal standards for health plans (both the explicit standards in the bill, and future standards to be written by the “Health Choices Commissioner”) will preempt any state law preventing the application of any of the requirements of the first division," Johnson explains.

The first division is the first 215 pages of the bill.
"This pre-emption provision amounts to a hidden 'Freedom of Choice Act' (FOCA) that could be applied to nullify state limitations on abortion," Johnson says.

The Senate bill also presents concerns as lawmakers in one committee in July voted to include abortions in that version of a national health care plan.
The amendment would require health insurance companies to contract with organizations like Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion business. Insurers would have to cover "essential community providers...that serve predominantly low-income, medically under-served individuals" such as Planned Parenthood.
The Senate HELP Committee also voted down four pro-life amendments, including one from Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma to protect state laws limiting abortions and abortion funding from being nullified by federal law under the health care bill.
As a result, Johnson told LifeNews.com at the time that the Kennedy bill in the Senate "will provide federal funding for abortion on demand, and nullify state laws regulating abortion."
In addition to the Missouri limits on abortion funding, Johnson explains that the Congressional bills can nullify laws "such as parental consent laws, waiting periods, and the like, since these would be regarded as impediments to a federally guaranteed 'essential benefit.'”
For Lee, gutting the Missouri limits on taxpayer-funded of abortion through health care plans would put state residents in the position of paying for the destruction of human life.
“An abortion mandate in the health care reform bill would be devastating to Missouri pro-lifers,” Lee said.

“For over 25 years, Missouri law has protected health insurance consumers so no one is forced to subsidize abortion coverage in health plans. The federal proposal could supersede and completely undo Missouri’s pro-life protection," he added.