Real Dissent

Iran and the EU are in the news again. The Bonesman or Knight of the Virgin George W. Bush is in the news inspiring the EU to act agressively against Iran. Bush said that Iran must stop enriching uranium. The European Union and the US are threatening more sanctions against Iran if Iran won't comply with their proposals. Some even want Iran to be not part of the global banking system. That's ironic since the West is trying to dictate Iran's life. If another nation told us to get rid of all of our weapons or submit to weapons inspections, we would be up in arms. Iran isn't a perfect nation and it should be criticized for their errors (like oppressing journalists, Christians, political dissidents, etc.). Although, sanctions and threats of war aren't going to solve the problems in the Middle Eastern region. Diplomacy, the encouragement of real dissident, pro-freedom groups in Iran, ending the Iraq War, and focusing on dialogue can create a peaceful relationship with Iran. It's been long established that the neo-conservative philsophies of premptive wars, running up deficits, and proposing utopian visions (as outlined in the PNAC Document. PNAC stands for the Project of a New American Century. It blatantly calls for wars in Iraq and Iran for strategic interests. It even discusses about using genotype or race specific bioweapons against people. You couldn't make this stuff up) are archaic. These visions don't work. The deal with Iran is that Iran is complex because Russia and China are funding Iran. Fundamentally, Iran isn't Iraq. The reason is that Iran's military and industry are much more powerful than Iraq. That's why it isn't a Republican or Democratic deal. It's pro-liberty deal and a pro-truth deal. McCain wants American G.I.s to be in Iraq for 50 years. Newt Gingrich also expressed a view of the war on terror lasting decades. David Edwards and Mike Sheehan from the Raw Story at Tuesday, on June 10, 2008 described more news about Dennis Kucinich. He was an ex-Presidential candidate. Now, Dennis has presented articles of impeachment against President George W. Bush to Congress. I don't agree with Dennis Kucinich on all issues (like him seeking to ban all handguns from the hands of citizens), but Dennis is one of the few sincere liberals in Congress. He presented it into the House on late Monday evening. It aired live on C-Span. Even if you don't agree with impeachment, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that Bush (plus others in his adminstration) have the perfect qualifications to be impeached. Impeachment is the the first of two stages in a specific process for a legislative body to remove a government official without that official's agreement. The trial and conviction of a public official for high crimes and misdemeanors is done if impeachment is enacted. Proof of impeaching Bush is easy since Bush outlined a secret propaganda campaign to create a false case for war against Iraq. He passed illegal laws like the Patriot Act plus the USA Military Commissions Act, Bush disregarded hundreds of laws, he supported the NSA warrantless wiretap program, and supports the anti-national sovereignity plus the unaccountable SPP group. The SPP or the Security Prosperity Partnership organization advocates North American integration or a North American Union.

Bush allowed torture memos to run rampant and become supported by Alberto Gonzales. Alberto quit soon afterwards. Torture is immoral and wrong. Once in April of 2007, Dennis Kucinich presented articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney. He wants to stop the war in Iraq and the possible war in Iran. Although Bush is a puppet, because he is manipulated and controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations, the Vatican/Jesuits, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and other groups to forment certain activities. Dr. Laurie Roth from June 8, 2008 at NewsWithViews.com made known about eminent domain. Eminent domain is still occuring after the Supreme Court (made up of mostly Roman Catholic with at least one Knight of Columbus member. The K of C is a groups invented in the 1800's whose purpose is to spread Papal doctrine and influence across America. The K of C are in league with the Jesuits. The leader of the Jesuits is Adolfo Nicolas. The Jesuit's goal has always been to destroy the Protestant Reformation. That Reformation wasn't perfect, but it did allow the freedom of the press, the freedom of religion, etc. to flourish in the West) officially legalized it with their decision years ago. Eminent domain is about the government or corporate interests stealing private property basically. This is activated in the name of trying to progress urban needs or construction goals. One example of this is how the federal government is supporting the TTC or the Trans Texas Corridor where land is stolen from citizens in order to build a huge superhighway. The good news is that the TTC is being sidetracked temporarily. Eniment domain isn't just happening in Texas, it's occuring in Washington State. There is the Colf family farm that they've been farming at since 1870. Animals regularly graze on that land. The deal is that Washington approved the Corps to study the deeping of the Columbia channel from 40-43 feet. The Corps wanted the Colf's family farm to in order to offshet potential loses due to the environmental impact of all of the drilling. The Colf family refuses the eminent domain. They made a compromise, but the Corps and Governor Gregoire still took a big chunk of their farmland in 2008. The deal is that the Corps never made an explicit intention of utilizing the Colf family's lands for mitigation until 2007. Dr. Laurie Roth wrote that other lands were avaliable for mitigation. Eminent domain is still a threat against land rights and private property. Freedom of speech in under assualt all over the world. Even in America, we have problems. It's worse in England and Canada where you can go to jail or be fined of some of the things that we can say in the United States of America. Now a so-called human rights tribunal ordered a Christian pastor to renounce his faith and never express moral dissent with homosexuality according to a new report. This decision was dated at May 30. The evangelical pastor Stephen Boisson was banned from expressing his biblical perspective of homosexuality and ordered to pay $5,000 for "damages for pain and suffering" as well as apologize to the activist who complained of being hurt. He refuses to apologize. The Rev. Alphonse de Valk also face similar charges. Now, Boisson wrote a letter to the editor in his local Red Deer, Alberta newspaper in 2002 in disagreeing with homosexual activism, especially against young children. An activist and local teacher Darren Lund filed a complaint and he was convicted by the lawyer Lori G. Andreachuk. The court ordered Boisson not to express his opinion even though he committed no crime. Boisson was ordered not to dissent with homosexuality on the email, radio, speeches, or even the Internet. When did Canada had anti-free speech tendencies like this? They want him to apologize as well. the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal is ordering to the minister to renounce his Christian faith. This is crazy because regardless of what you think about homosexuality, we have a right to publicly disagree or agree with the lifestyle if we want to. Personally, I don't agree with the lifestyle of homosexuality. I don't agree with violence against homosexuals (I believe homosexuals should have the same rights of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as every other human being should have. I don't agree with special rights given unto homosexuals though like homosexual marriage via judicial fiat. That issue ought to be handled by the legislature and individuals). On the other hand, I don't agree that peaceful dissent with the lifestyle of homosexuality should be banned. Now, this is yet another case of the anti-free speech agenda. Although, most Canadians believe in free speech and are patriotic. A lot of real Canadians are exposing the new world order legitimately. World Net Daily reported on this story. In Britian, preachers were charged with a hate crime for just preaching the gospel. Anti-Population Control is my M.O. Population growth is a beautiful thing. The United Nations Population Division report that the United States adopt more than any other country in the world. The United States adopts over 120,000 children. Next on the list are China, Russia, Ukraine, and other Western European nations. Adoption occurs mostly domestically and the quality of it varies from state to state. Domestic adoptions have done down. Some believe that this trend is happening because of the wider societal acceptance of single parenthood, increased access to welfare support for single mothers and the widespread availability of inexpensive contraception may have contributed to this trend (according to Clare Menozzi, a demographer with the UN Population Division and the principal author of the report). India and Sri Lanka have increased domestic adoptions. China and Russia are the leaders in international adoptions in terms of being the countries of origin. Overpopulation is a lie, yet it's still promoted by sites like OilEmpire.us (who advocates abortion and population control when globalists and the corporate elite endorse such policies. The liar Thomas Malthus believed in this lie). Overpopulation is a lie, because global population growth has decreased since 1960. The world can fit into the state of Texas given 1,000 sq. feet each. That can leave the rest of the world empty. The deal with poverty and starvation are caused by many factors like technology, wars, natural disasters, greed, waste, the misue of resources, etc. not overpopulation. More people and better access to real technology by human beings can solve a lot of the poverty issues in the world. Additionally, Education and health care are important issues to discuss.

Right to Carry Laws have been given an increased popularity. The reason is that there has been many school shootings and rampant violence in the streets. The federal government cite a downturn of violence crime in the USA, but problems still exist. One life being murdered is one life too many in my eyes. We can never be truly perfect since we're human beings. On the other hand, we should try to be better in terms of radically improving crime conditions in America. Howard Nemerov from at June 8, 2008 in NewsWithViews.com described such news about right to carry laws. He wrote about justifable homicide or deaths that are justifiable or excusable. According to Howard, about 2/3 (or 65.6%) of the U.S. population live in states with shall issue concealed carry laws. They are where law abiding citizens are trained to own them. Howard Nemerov showed stats that prove that justifiable homicide are lower in Right to Carry states than states without any right to carry laws. The average violent crime rate for non-RTC states was 513.5 and their average murder rate was 6.4. What does this show? It shows that right to carry states allow private citizens to defend themselves in public. It basically enhances individual liberty. If a criminal comes into a bank, someone can protect themselves in a crisis situation if they own a concealed carry gun. Rates of justifiable homicide are lower in RTC states than non-RTC states. Citizens with concealed carry laws also can act as back to law enforcement, so criminals won't be apt to commit crimes at all. The Second Amendment was created for a reason. It wasn't formed for just the militias or for hunting. It was specifically created to prevent the government from being tyrannical. Historically, dictatorships like the Nazi empire, the Soviet Union, Cuba, etc. banned the citizen's right to own weapons in order to fixed control over people in a harsh fashion. Also, the Second Amendment is a law that protects Americans from criminals. It gives citizens the right of self defense. Humans always have the God-given right of self defense. The suspicious fire at the Governor's mansion in Texas existed days ago. The media said that the mansion was burned as a product of an arson attack. There was no evidence that fire was politically motivated, although State Fire Marshall Paul Maldonado said that it was an intentionally set fire. The security in the building had strong security protecting it. People would regularly be questioned if they came close to the building by Austin police. There is also surveillance cameras as well DPS troopers there. Maldonado commented that he didn't know where the fire started. DPS troopers were on the scene guarding the property when the fire begun according to Captian Paul Schulze. The only person or people who could of set the fire (in my opinion) was if we someone was on the inside of the local government or an extremely smart individual. Officials said that surveillance show just one person starting the fire, but others could be involved. Typically in these incidents, the media regularly false blame the whole anti-new world order patriot community. For example, patriots were demonized after the Waco murder by the feds and especially after the Oklahoma City bombing (when Elohim City was infiltrated by the FBI. Researchers found secondary devices in the Building and the Federal government had foreknowledge of the event). The 9/11 Truth Movement is growing. Phil Donahue was confronted by We Are Change Minnesota about 9/11 being an inside job. Phil Donahue was in a media conference for liberal-types. Some of these types wanted the Fairness Doctrine, but the Fairness Doctrines strifies free speech and expression. Phil denied that 9/11 was an inside job. Donahue told the We Are Change interviewer that he didn't wish to subscribe to conspiracy theories. The truth is that conspiracy facts existed throughout human history. Examples of real conspiracies include the death of Julius Caesar, the assasination of Abraham Lincoln, USS Liberty, Operation Gladio, and of course 9/11. 9/11 is an inside job and the government was involved in killing nearly 3,000 people. The reason is because the government controlled NORAD that didn't intercept the planes from hitting their targets, drills occured, wargames occured, the government funded Osama bin Laden (his CIA code name was Tim Osman) plus al-Qaeda, and the collapse of the buildings reminisce of controlled demolitions (i.e. squids points were seen in the Twin Towers, no plane hit Building Number Seven, there was witnesses hearing explosives even in the basement of the Towers, thermate was discovered, etc). Now, there has been news about Mark Dice trying to send 9/11 Truth material to the military in Iraq. Mark Dice debated a Neo Con on FOX News. Dice wanted to send 9/11 Truth literature and movies to the troops in Iraq. Some members of the government committed treason for proposing using a plane with a symbol on it to provoke Iraq to attack it, so a war can develop. The federal government try to exploit tradegies like 9/11 (when they help caused this event) in order to cause control society and create these wars on aggression. It's important to expose the Bohemian Grove, the Jesuit Order, the Knights of Malta, and all of these elite groups and organizations. The real 911 Truth Movement isn't going away. Even more police and government officials view 9/11 as an inside job because of the blatant components of the attack.

The media, Barack Obama's supporters, and John McCain's advocates claim that both Presidential candidates are extremely far apart on the isssue. They say you must vote or you don't have a right to criticize. What happened to the First Amendment. Individuals have a right to speak out and criticize things even if they refuse to vote. They typically outline fear themselves conversely criticizing the other candidates of prepetuating fear. Is this true that both candidates are widely apart on the issues? Here's the truth? Similarities definitely exist among Barack and McCain in terms of their policies. Both Barack Obama and John McCain agree with gun control and the continuation of Campaign Finance Reform. Campaign Finance Reform was a law that was so anti-First Amendment that the ACLU criticized it. Subsequently, the Supreme Court had to get rid of certain parts. The Supreme Court acted in this manner, because much of the bill suppressed free speech rights. Each agree with man-made global warming and want restrictions on carbon dioxide when CO2 is a healthy gas for plant life. Both have similar views on immigration. Both of them agree with the killing going on in the war on terror. Obama was against the Iraq War in 2002, but even he wants to kill people in Afghansitan. McCain wants a war with Iran if necessary. Obama says he wants to attack Pakistan if a certain scenario takes place whereby Pakistan is extremely uncooperative with the United States. So, absent some other issues, Barack Obama and John McCain are more similar than people realize. Obama booted out Jim Johnson for his connection with a loan whose company relates to the mortgage crisis. The CFR/Bilderberg-controlled mainstream media and the establishment just want us for the most part to be into the 2 party duopoly or monopoly. Internet 2 is a real threat. Internet 2 is about a proposed new Internet where is the present Internet is heavily restricted or banned altogether. This isn't news since for years proposals like this existed. It false against the authentic principle of net neutrality. Governments and corporate elite want the Internet sedated and control because the Internet is one of the last outputs for the real truth to come. Attacks on the Internet is happening now. For example, according to the New Scientist magazine. "At the same time, US lawmakers are attempting to force the social networking sites themselves to control the amount and kind of information that people, particularly children, can put on the sites. In a display of bi-partisanship, there have recently been calls for all out mandatory ISP snooping on all US citizens by both Democrats and Republicans alike. The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror. The Nation magazine reported in 2006 that, "Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies to try to track all of our information in cyberspace. The Internet is a battleground for freedom and I reject any federal government regulation of the Internet.

Jim Tucker discussed more about the Bilderberger meeting in Chantilly, Virginia days ago. According to Tucker, his sources made known that the Bilderbergers wanted a widespread implementation of mircochips on human beings. It's easy to figure that Vercihip, governments globally, and other entities wants microchips on humans as common as those using a credit card. Tucker says that the Bilderberg Group desires the microchips under the pretext of "blonde, blue eyed terrorists." FOX News and other neo con circles have promoted the paranoia of such blonde, blue eyed "Al-Qaeda" on their news shows. Tucker believes that the idea was sold on getting instantaneous access to health records if a microchips are placed in patients. These plans are nothing new. In 2004, Mexico's attorney general and 160 of his office staff were implanted with tracker chips to control access to to secure areas of their headquarters. Tucker believed that European Bilderbergers are skeptical about going along with an invasion of Iran. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates tried to support a move, but it wasn't popular. As for oil prices, immediately after the meeting, you have Bilderberger Timothy Geithner, (who is the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York), advancing the idea of centralizing money into a global financial system. A global banking system under the the control of the elite has been a brainchild of the globalists for decades. One gloal banking system equates typically an unified currency. That is why so many economic experts want a North American currency similar to an amero. Vernon Jordan, Henry Kissinger, Paul Gigot, David Rockefeller, etc. are apart of the Bilderberg Group. The Bilderberg Group is controlled by key Papal Order, key royal order, and key political groups (who have influence on occult organizations). These key world leaders include Prince Edward or the Duke of Kent (the “Most Worshipful” Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England or the UGLE), Spencer Compton, Lord Inge, Etienne Davignon (the head of the Bilderberg Group), and SMOM head Matthew Festing. The top of the Pyramid is obviously in the Vatican/Jesuits and the City London (along with various bloodlines. Troy was the first to expose the new world order connection to the The Constantinian Order). The FED is using fiat money in other to centralize their power and control all banks. They want the middle class dependent on the government completely. Peak Oil is a lie. Oil according to Dr. Jerome Corsi is abiotic or created spontaneously in the ground. Scientists can create hydocarbons from bacteria now. Oil documents even talk about oil companies using artifical scrarity as a means to get products and control supply. One document is a Chevron memo from years ago. The devalualing of the dollar is another huge factor of high oil prices as well. Frankily, the supply is contolled in a controlled market by OPEC and a few interests. Reports even show that Montana will have between 3.4 and 4 billion barrels of oil undiscovered. South Dakota voted for referiners. Even Alberta, Canada, Brazil, and other places have oil yet to be fully researched. Also, alternative energy ought to be promoted in order not to be dependent on foreign sources of oil. Well, expanding our minds like talking about Darfur, the enviornment, religious liberty, our health freedom, cell phones (excessive cell phone usage is documented as to increase the risks of cancers), flouride (sodium flouride eats hole in the brain and attacks the bone plus the immune system. Dozens of studies confirm this), education, abortion, gun rights, etc. are fine. There is the threat of viruses in vaccines. The Jesuit Order was crucial in the promotion of vaccines back centuries ago. Most people don't agree with RFID chips, but they are still endorsed. Militarized police are everywhere and our borders have problems with being secured. Although, it's just as vital to make distinctions. Making distinctions of good and evil isn't divisive behavior at all. It's honorable behavior that can get the facts straight, while waking up folks. That's our job while we're here on this Earth. Compromise isn't an option. Going for the truth is the only option for us as long as we're breathing in this world.


By Timothy