Troy's Research into The Vatican/Jesuits, etc.

From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=37646

QUOTES OF MINE ABOVE CONTAIN GLARING MISTAKES THAT I CAN'T BELIEVE I MADE.

THE ERRORS THAT I MADE, THAT HAVE BEEN REPRINTED BELOW, ARE REPOSTED ON THE FOLLOWING WEBPAGES.

PLEASE TAKE A NOTE OF THESE FOR THE SAKE OF FUTURE RESEARCHERS.

WITH THANKS -

TROY

http://wikicompany.org/wiki/911:Masons#Freemasonry



http://www.vaticanassassins.org/order_of_constantine.htm



THE FOLLOWING LINES ARE IN ERROR:

World Freemasonry being controlled directly by the Queen's first cousin, The Duke of Kent as "Most Worshipful" Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (also Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Mark Master Masons & Grand Master of the Order of St Michael & St George).

AND IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH:

The Duke of Kent's brother, the Duke of Gloucester, is the Grand Prior of the Knights of St John (or Most Venerable Order of St John). He is also the First Grand Principal of the Supreme Grand Lodge of Royal Arch Masons of England.



THE FIRST PARAGRAPH SHOULD READ:

World Freemasonry being controlled directly by the Queen's first cousin, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, as "Most Worshipful" Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (also First Grand Principal of the Supreme Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons of England & Grand Master of the Order of St Michael & St George).

AND THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH SHOULD READ:

The Duke of Kent's brother, Prince Michael of Kent, is the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Mark Master Masons. Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, is the first cousin of the Duke of Kent & Prince Michael of Kent. He is the Grand Prior of the Order of St John (or Most Venerable Order of St John).

APOLOGIES FOR ANY CONFUSION! -
TROY

______________________________________________

TO CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT OF HAVING BEEN THROWN OUT OF THE CUB SCOUTS WHEN I WAS A NIPPER (ALTHOUGH I HASTEN TO ADD THAT I WAS NOT A ROMAN CATHOLIC!):

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/06/13/scouts-refuse-boy-who-wont-swear-oath-to-the-queen/

Scouts refuse boy who won’t swear oath to the Queen
June 13, 2008 · No Comments

Disappointed: Matthew McVeigh

By Auslan Cramb

Telegraph Jun 6, 2008

An eight-year-old boy has been told he cannot become a Cub Scout after refusing to swear allegiance to the Queen.

Matthew McVeigh objected to part of the Cub Scout Promise which includes the line, “I promise to do my duty to God and the Queen”.

His mother Tracy wanted the pledge changed on religious grounds to: “I promise to do my duty to God and my country”.

But Matthew was told by the 1st Neilston Scout Group in Renfrewshire that unless he took the official oath he could not become a fully-fledged Cub.

Mrs McVeigh, a Roman Catholic, complained the 1701 Act of Settlement specifically discriminated against her faith because it only allowed Protestants to take the throne in Britain.

She added: “Why should we make an oath to the monarchy? The monarchy actively discriminates against Catholics.

“It’s an absolute disgrace in this day and age. We are supposed to live in a multi-cultural age, but this just flies in the face of that.”

The Scout Association allows young people of different religions to replace the word “God” with other deities, and also allows people of other nationalities in the UK to swear to do their duty to “the country in which I am now living”.

But Chris Foster, spokesman for the association, said the rules stated that British nationals must pledge allegiance to the Queen.

He added: “It is simply UK Scout Association policy that all British subjects must promise that.”

Its rules state that scouting is available to all faiths and takes account of the different religions of its members.

In the case of the Scout Promise, which adds the words “On my honour,” at the start of the Cub Scout pledge, Muslims may choose to substitute the phrase with, “In the name of Allah, the Most Beneficent the Most Merciful”.

Mrs McVeigh, 29, a mother-of-three, said her son was an intelligent boy and did not want to make the promise “just for the sake of saying it”.

She added: “I was gobsmacked that the Cub Scout commissioner said that if Matthew didn’t say the promise he would effectively be out the door. He said he could still go along to trips, but he would not be insured.

“The Cub Scout Promise was worded way back in 1907 and, let’s face it, times have moved on. Matthew aboslutely adores the Cub Scouts.

“I am not asking for special treatment, I would just like him to be a Cub Scout without compromising what he believes in.”

Matthew said the decision was “not fair”, adding: “I really enjoy the Cubs and don’t want to feel left out or different to everybody else.”

Fr Jim Byers, Scouting chaplain of the local Catholic diocese, said he had never heard of a case of religious objection to the promise in 20 years, but urged the Scouting authorities to look into the case.

Cubs have to recite the full promise, which states: “I promise that I will do my best, To do my duty to God and to the Queen, To help other people, And to keep the Scout Law.”

After reciting the verse they receive a badge, woggle and neckerchief and become a fully-fledged Cub Scout.