Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Prolifers are actively involved in caring for women

From This is the link.





PRO-CHOICE ARGUMENT:
"Prolifers don't care about women, and they don't care about babies once they are born.
"

*A publication of the National Abortion Rights Action League states, "The 'Prolife' concerns of abortion foes are only for fetal lives, not the lives of women or unwanted babies.
"


PRO-LIFE ANSWER:
Prolifers are actively involved in caring for women in crisis pregnancies and difficult child-raising situations.


A "Dear Abby" letter, signed "Hates Hypocrites," angrily challenges people opposing abortion: "Why aren't you volunteering to baby-sit a child born to a single mother so she can work? Why haven't you opened your door to a pregnant teenager whose parents have kicked her out when she took your advice and decided not to have an abortion?" The writer rails against prolifers, calling them hypocrites. Abby responds, "I couldn't have said it better.
"

This approach has two basic flaws. First, it is possible to point out an injustice even when one does not provide the solution. People could say slavery was wrong even if they did not open their homes to a slave. A man can say it is wrong for his neighbor to beat his wife, even if he isn't in a position to give her a home.


I wholeheartedly agree, however, that people who point out injustices should seek to be part of the solution. This raises the second and most important flaw in the argument-- no evidence whatsoever is offered for the damning assumption made by the writer and by Abby.
Who says prolifers are not doing the things they are assumed not to be doing? The truth is, they are!

In virtually every part of the United States there are abortion alternative centers that provide free pregnancy tests, free counseling, and free material and human resources to pregnant women. There are more pro-life help-giving centers, well over three thousand of them, than there are prolife education and political action centers. Though their services cost them a great deal of money--as opposed to making them a great deal of money--there are more abortion alternative centers in the United States than there are abortion clinics.


Since these clinics draw business away from abortion clinics, they have come under fire from the prochoice movement and its representatives in the media. When a U.S. House committee, chaired by Oregon's Ron Wyden, investigated so-called "fake" abortion clinics, they did not allow a single prolife representative from any of the centers in question to testify. Had they done so, they would have found that the Crisis Pregnancy Centers require that their clinics advertise themselves as offering "Abortion Alternatives," and train their workers to give accurate medical information.


Having served on the board of an abortion alternative organization with two local centers, I have seen firsthand the provision of free prenatal care, free clothing, baby clothes, furnishings, and other help to needy women. Prolife families give free room and board as well as love and support to women who need it. Often prolife doctors volunteer no-cost medical help, and prolife lawyers donate legal aid to help with adoptions, when this is the woman's choice. When women choose to keep their children, single mother support groups and childcare are offered.


I believe prolifers can and should do more and more to help women in crisis pregnancies. But what they are doing already is considerable. It amounts to one of the largest and most effective volunteer efforts in our nation's history. While there are hypocrites in any group, to label prolifers in general as hypocrites is unfair and unsupported by the facts.

3 comments:

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Haven't had time to read article, but going to bed now, it's 04:07 am; and will read tomorrow. But from your title, it's clear I made some incorrect allegations, about some pro-lifers. My apologies, I will add this to the other comment. and read rest when I get up later.

Thanks for keeping me on my toes, and correcting me. Sorry.

Timothy said...

I appreciate that. We can disagree on some issues as we're human beings. This is normal.

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Okay, thanks again for the info; was not aware of it.

Clearly I was inacurate when I stated: "anti-abortionists, couldn't give a flying fuck about those babies 20 days after they are born, and in some goddamn fucking foster home, or beaten by incompetent mothers who are so emotionally and intellectually, not to mention spiritually insecure, they will let any man fuck them, or use a baby to black mail a man into marrying them.... "

Clearly there are indeed prolifers caring for women in pregnancy crisis.

I still think the most effective in terms of addressing the root causes (which not allot of people like doing, cause they are unpopular, and less 'righteous feel good') of crisis pregnancies is prevention, not cure.

And I don't think it's just caring for women; men are affected by crisis pregnancies too, some are blackmailed to get married and do so, and that's not 'liberty'. Just a slick form of indentured servitude.

I never understood why women and men go around pretending to try to be someone whom they really are not; just to 'catch' the other side; and then the resentment of the other one grows, because the other one is supposed to feel obliged for how this one has sufferred and changed themselves to be 'loved' by the other. And both forget who they are, and resent the other one for not knowing them, when they don't know themselves. And it's these types of people that intentionally and negligently (out of their insecurities) use the conception of babies, or the crisis pregnancies as emotional, psychological and financial baseball bats against the other parties.

I think that DNA carries not only biological genetic memory information, but also psychological, and emotional memory information. I think where an individual is not integrated, that DNA memory information is for want of better words 'confused and contradictory', and if the individual is integrated, it is much clearer. Just a semi-philosophical opinion, I don't have any evidence therefor.

I always said, I want to be loved by someone who loves me, and knows me as fucked up as I am; and I want to love them and know the real them, and loved the fucked up them; as they are. That's what I love about you, I know you may tease me, and joke with me, but that you will never pretend to be other than who you are, even if I may disagree. I would rather you be honest about who you are, even if we disagree. So I support and love you for being true to you.