The Armenian Genocide

QUOTE

Correct. This is because Kaiser Wilhelm II was a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor serving the Black Pope. He fired anti-Jesuit Prince Bismarck, he readmitted the Redemptorists into the Empire in 1893-4, he bought a palace for the Jesuits in Rome so that the Order could return to Italy in 1893 after the Order had been expelled by King Victor Emmanuel II in 1872, he readmitted the Company of Jesus back into the Empire in 1917 (after Bismarck and Wilhelm I expelled the Order in 1872) before he deliberately lost WWI via Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and the first Hitler, General Erich Ludendorff; and then he abandoned his own German people to the fate of the pope's Masonic Jewish Labor Zionist Communists in Bavaria (secretly backed by Bavarian Papal Nuncil Eugenio Pacelli) justifying the rise of the Frei Corps from Bamberg which later became the SS---of which two of Wilhelm's sons became members.

Kaiser Wilhelm II and Sultan Abdul Hamid II worked together in the Order's mass-murder of the "heretic" Orthodox Armenian Chtistians of the Ottoman Empire. The article below is true in all its facts.

Protestant American Christians came to the rescue and aid to the surviving Armenians, but Masonic Jesuit Coadjutor Theodore Roosevelt never raised a hand to intervene, politically or militarily. For Roosevelt was the pawn of the Archbishop of Baltimore James Cardinal Gibbons and was secretly advised by the son of "burn-em-up" General Sherman, Jesuit Thomas Sherman!

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric

the reader cannot help but be troubled by Germany's actions regarding the Armenian genocide. In a position of superior power, Germany made a conscious decision to support the genocidal program of its weaker ally.

In German Responsibility in the Armenian Genocide: A Review of the Historical Evidence of German Complicity, Vahakn N. Dadrian, the author of the landmark History of the Armenian Genocide, takes the middle road. Dadrian does not accuse Germany of instigating the Armenian genocide; he argues instead that Germany contributed to the genocide through policies that condoned it and that the German government sanctioned German and Turkish officials who participated in the genocide's implementation.

At the high policy level, Dadrian finds a willingness by Germany to embrace Turkey's genocidal tactics toward the Armenians. Kaiser Wilhelm II's tolerance for the Turkish government's anti-Armenian policies filtered down to his advisers and directly influenced German relations with Turkey. Germany responded "nonchalantly" to empire-wide Turkish attacks from 1894 to 1896 against the Armenians, which resulted in approximately 300,000 Armenian deaths. Dadrian argues that Wilhelm II's lack of response to the first massacre signaled to the Turks "that Germany did not object to the emergence of a new Turkey that is purged of its native Armenian population" (13). German nonchalance toward Turkey's anti-Armenian violence continued in the wake of the 1915-1916 massacre.

Germany's pro-Turkish stance led to an official policy of "non-intervention" toward the Armenian genocide, a policy publicly justified on the grounds that Germany needed to maintain the trust of its wartime ally. While positing a policy of nonintervention, Germany actively worked to cover up the genocide and to minimize any suspicion of German involvement. Germany sent two diplomatic notes, both mild in tone, to the Turkish government which protested the genocide. Dadrian argues that the purpose of the notes lay in the dismissal of any suggestion of German participation. In addition to censoring the press and distributing anti-Armenian propaganda, Germany also created a diplomatic White Book designed to blame the Armenians for Turkish reprisals against them and to document German efforts to alleviate the situation through diplomatic pressure.

As Germany worked to disassociate itself from the appearance of complicity in the genocide, a number of German officials were involved in its implementation to varying degrees. Dadrian acknowledges that "there is no explicit evidence to suggest that such massacres were in fact intended by the Germans involved," but he maintains that German officials became "indirect accessories to crimes perpetuated by the [Turkish] Special Organization functionaries whose overall goal they endorsed, financed to some extent, and shepherded" (54-5). Germany sanctioned their involvement, both officially and through silent approval.

While most German participation in the genocide occurred through studied passivity or casual suggestion, some individuals participated more directly. High-ranking military and diplomatic officials ordered and assisted in the Armenian deportations while fully cognizant of the fate that awaited the Armenians. For example, General Bronsart von Schellendorf, the senior member of the German Military Mission to Turkey, issued deportation orders demanding that "severe measures" be used against a disarmed Armenian labor battalion. "Severe measures" was a euphemism for the killing actions carried out by the Turkish-government-sponsored Special Organization bands. Others, such as German artillery officer Major Eberhard Wolffskeel, participated more directly. Wolffskeel single-handedly laid waste to the Armenian section of Ufra, home to 25,000 Armenians, after the Turks were unable to overwhelm barricades erected by Armenians attempting to stave off deportation.

Dadrian does note, however, that a number of German officials in Turkey objected to the Armenian genocide and German involvement in it. Consular field representatives sent frantic reports detailing the ongoing slaughter of the Armenians to the German main office in Istanbul. The information, upon which the field representatives pleaded for action, was either suppressed or ignored. Those German officials who attempted to intervene actively on behalf of the Armenians encountered reprimands from their superiors.

Sanction of the Armenian genocide by Germany extended to include rewards and aid to Turkish officials closely involved in the killings. A number of Turks received the Prussian Orders of the Black and Red Eagle and the Iron Cross from the German government. Furthermore, seven of the leaders who masterminded the genocide found sanctuary in Germany after the war. They escaped Turkey with help from three high-ranking German military officers who provided assistance with the official knowledge of Berlin. Dadrian regards the decoration of the Turks and the extension of sanctuary to them as further demonstration of official German approval of the Armenian genocide and as a sign of moral bankruptcy.

Using Turkish and German state archives, Dadrian has constructed a case for German complicity in the Armenian genocide -- and it is precisely his intent to build a case. The volume consists of two long legal briefs, each of which is approximately eighty pages, with supporting appendices. Dadrian chose to construct the volume in this manner because he wanted to identify by a preponderance of evidence those Germans engaged in criminal acts and those who abetted the crimes. This format is more than a rhetorical strategy: Dadrian explicitly challenges German authorities on a legal and historical basis to assume moral responsibility for Germany's role in the Armenian genocide.

This format has two distinct consequences for the reception of Dadrian's work. First, the lack of a narrative structure or a basic explanation of the events surrounding the Armenian genocide severely hampers the advancement of Dadrian's argument. The reader works too hard to understand the events being discussed and their implications. Consequently, the book lacks the power of works on the Holocaust that also document perpetrators, collaborators, and criminal acts, but which do so in a compelling, readable manner. Second, the legal-brief format and overt moral agenda raise questions about Dadrian's use of evidence. By its very nature, a brief utilizes only those facts that support a case and reduces opaque relationships to black-and-white terms. Dadrian's work is very black and white -- where appropriate, he identifies individuals as either perpetrators or co-conspirators and details the natures of their crimes. There are no gray areas. Dadrian also makes a weak attempt to connect the Armenian genocide to the Holocaust by using an appendix to list prominent Nazis who served in Turkey at the time of the former. While avoiding a blanket indictment of all Germans, Dadrian's linkage of the Armenian genocide to the Holocaust in this manner implies an argument of continuity which he neither supports nor adequately explores. Moral indictments of participants in historical events should be accompanied by judicious handling of evidence.

Yet despite the volume's flaws, the reader cannot help but be troubled by Germany's actions regarding the Armenian genocide. In a position of superior power, Germany made a conscious decision to support the genocidal program of its weaker ally. Germany was not a perpetrator, but it remains far removed from the position of bystander.


Meredith Hindley
American University



________________

http://www.kaisersbunker.com/pt/pelzmutze.htm


Notice the Maltese Crosses and Skull & Bones my friends


-Craig
______________________



It not difficult to understand how Jesuits pushed Bismarck to allow the dark side of the laws against the Roman Catholic coup in Germany, to hit polish national sense and to create a counter-reaction of Catholic polish against Protestant Germans, a counter-reaction disguised as 'ethnic problems'. I know something about this assassin strategy around my zones of North Adriatic, performed by Italian irredentism & Fascism.....

You'll find always the Templars i.e. Freemasonry and related lodges etc. doing the dirty job. Clear, a Catholic 'good' work to save their souls. Some centuries before Vatikan damned de Molay's ..... So for centuries thay had the alibi to require all the 'good' works from the members of Skull & Bones in order to 'save their soul'... Isn't 'saving' his 'soul' our friend Bush with his policy that destroy heretic America?.... All fits and so all fitted in Protestant Prussia.

Best regards from a NOrth Adriatic Anti-catholic isolationist

avles

_____________________________

Dear Mark,

Thank you for contacting me.

The Armenian Genocide carried out by the pope's Jesuit Coadjutors Kaiser Wilhelm II, King George V, President Woodrow Wilson and Sultan Hamid II killed almost 2 million non-papal, Orthodox Christians. The Order's Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 would continue the inquisiton against the Russian Orthodox Christians backed of course by London and Washington, D.C.

Republican fascist Dick Gephardt is a Jesuit coadjutor and is a good choice for the Masonic Islamic Turks to further suppress the Genocide. The real purpose of this agitation is to drive the Turks into the arms of the Moslem world which includes an alliance with the USSR. Jesuit Pelosi is leading the crusade and may well succeed, not to vindicated the Armenians, but to alienate the Turks for I do not believe Turkey will be allowed entrance into the pope's Roman Catholic EU.

Ron Paul is indeed a Jesuit Coadjutor who, as I have said, is a traitor to us Americans and a loyal stooge of the pope.

----- Original Message -----
From: markyacoubian@aol.com
To: eric@vaticanassassins.org
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 10:14 PM
Subject: I love your work! Also, information and comments on the impending Armenian genocide vote in the House, as well as Ron Paul


Dear Eric Jon Phelps,


My name is Mark Yacoubian and I am a 26 year old from Memphis, TN. I am half-Armenian, my father is full Armenian and was born in Jerusalem. I am a huge fan of your work! Your radio show appearances, like the ones on cloakanddagger.de are fantastic. Last night I listened to you on Greg Szymanski's radio show. It was very well done. You have obviously done your research. I will try and buy your book, "Vatican Assassins" for Christmas.

As you may know, there is an impending vote on the floor of the House of Representatives regarding the recognition of the Armenian genocide. The Turkish lobby is trying hard not to get it passed, and they have hired a lobbying firm that employs Dick Gephardt to represent them.

Here is a quote from a CNN article about it:

" Turkey on Thursday recalled its ambassador to the United States and warned of repercussions in a growing dispute over congressional efforts to label the World War I era killings of Armenians by Ottoman Turkish forces "genocide."

The U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs passed the measure 27-21 Wednesday. President Bush and key administration figures lobbied hard against the measure, saying it would create unnecessary headaches for U.S. relations with Turkey.

Turkey -- now a NATO member and a key U.S. ally in the war on terror -- accepts Armenians were killed but call it a massacre during a chaotic time, not an organized campaign of genocide.

The full House could vote on the genocide resolution as early as Friday. A top Turkish official warned Thursday that consequences "won't be pleasant" if the full House approves the resolution."

Here is a link to the full article: http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/11/us....ians/index.html

Here is another link to a similar article: http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/10/11...ests/index.html

Also note the flags that the protesters are holding; they have half moons which you have talked about and they are red--more than likely signifying Marxist influence.

President Bush has warned Congressmen to vote against the resolution saying it would " do great harm to our relations with a key ally in NATO and in the global war on terror."

The article from fox news says: "The dispute involves the killing of up to 1.5 million Armenians by Ottoman Turks around the time of World War I, an event widely viewed by genocide scholars as the first genocide of the 20th century. Turkey denies that the deaths constituted genocide, says the toll has been inflated and insists that those killed were victims of civil war and unrest."

here is a link to that full article: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,300692,00.html

I believe that President Bush is desperate for so-called allies in the "global war on terror." However, Turkey has done nothing to make it seem that it is doing any good in the region. In fact, Turkey is acting aggressively and under the radar screen from most people trying to keep track of the news.

Yesterday cnn.com reported the following:

"Turkish warplanes and helicopter gunships attacked suspected positions of Kurdish rebels near Iraq on Wednesday, a possible prelude to a cross-border operation that would likely raise tensions with Washington.
The military offensive also reportedly included shelling of Turkish Kurd guerrilla hideouts in northern Iraq, which is predominantly Kurdish. U.S. officials are already preoccupied with efforts to stabilize other areas of Iraq and oppose Turkish intervention in the relatively peaceful north."

link to entire article: http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/10/10/...iref=newssearch

Mr. Phelps, one might wonder why would the President say to vote against the resolution and side with Turkey on this issue? Why would we take the side of Turkey on an issue concerning a genocide?

Skull and Bones member and slave of the Papacy, President George W. Bush, sides against the Orthodox Armenians and upholds the Turks because the US and Britain have been the secret builders and masters of "modern" Turkey since the turn of the 20th Century. Washington and London, ruled by the Jesuits, backed the Genocide and helped to cover it up. Turkey was then given aid by the US to Freemason Ataturk who directed the building of Turkey. Turkey was used by Jesuit controlled Knight of Malta Henry Kissinger ("Killinger") to invade Orthodox Cyprus and kill tens of thousands of accursed "heretics." Turkey will one day in the near future take the rest of the island, driving the surviving Orthodox people to Greece. Turkey is bent upon reclaiming their island of Cyprus which it lost to the British after WWI.

Well, last year (November 2006) the Pope went to Turkey. Here is a quote:

"The Pope told the prime minister he wanted to visit Turkey because it was a bridge between religions and cultures.
"I want to reiterate the solidarity between the cultures," he said. "This is our duty."

here is a full link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6189962.stm

When he was in Turkey last year, Pope Benedict XVI denounced Islam, but no mention was made of the Armenian Genocide. That has long been an issue of Turkey's acceptance into the EU.

Turkey will never be brought into the EU. It will be driven to side with Russia in preparation for the future attack on Israel (Ezekiel 38).

Perhaps the Pope told President Bush what to do on this issue, as well as others...

Of course, as the pope rules the US through the Archbishop of New York, Edward Cardinal Egan.

Robert Wexler voted against it. Ron Paul did not vote on the measure. He may have not been in Washington, but it seems as if he answers to the Pope and the President, and is merely controlled opposition.

Agreed.

Dan Burton voted against it, as well as Robert Wexler. They both were concerned about losing allies.

link to the article: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wo...=la-home-center

So as you can see Mr. Phelps, global politics gives us strange situations. The only Jewish Congressman in the comittee who voted against it was Robert Wexler, and he was questioned why he voted the way he did, especially since he was a descendant of Holocaust survivors. Rahm Immanuel (Democrat from Illinois) also plans to vote against it.

Wexler is a papal court Jew.

Remember folks that British Intelligence controls Rahm Benjamin Emanuel who's the head of the North American Institute known to most as MOSSAD. Now please remember that his brother is Ari Emanuel and this cretin is the agent of Michael "Coadjutor" Moore. Pelosi is very much linked to Rahm.

It seems as if there is more uproar against recognizing the Armenian genocide than there was in denouncing Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 's denial of the Holocaust! President Bush said nothing, neither did the Pope after the Iranian President made his denial. It seems that the Vatican may have been an influence in both decisions, and it is lending credence to the belief that there is a bigger player behind both atrocities.

That player was the Jesuit Order controlling the Islamic Masons who carried out the murder.

Finally, on the subject of 9-11, your analysis makes the most sense. It was clearly a huge, orchestrated attack, but who did it? That is the question many ask. I believe that you get the closest to the perpetrators Mr. Phelps. You have pinned it on the Jesuits and Vatican, and the desired outcome is something that you have figured out.

In fall of 2001 i was in college at Rhodes College in Memphis . One of the classes I was taking was called Topics in Psychology : Psychology of Evil. It seems like and odd class to take , but I was drawn to it somehow. We spent the first month talking about what would fall under the banner of evil: the Nazis and the Miligram experiments regarding the use of electric shock therapy. Those experiments clearly showed how evil snowballs and how out of hand things can get. One of my Professor's memorable quotes from that was the old Nazi line: "I was only following orders."

In the class we talked about how Hitler and the Nazis slowly gained power, and how , in the midst of tragic and horrific circumstances , "everything seemed normal at the time" to the German people. It was clear that mass psychology and group think played a role in allowing tragic things to occur.

Today, that is promoted by the pope's CFR-controlled press, especially CFR member and SMOM Fox News mogul, Rupert Murdoch.

The week before September 11th we watched "Triumph of the Will" in class. I am nearly 100 percent certain that he compared the film to "the boys of Brazil" which is supposedly about a Nazi takeover in Brazil. The professor also talked about the Hitler Youth Movement and things like that. On the Friday before 9-11 we finished watching it.
The only homework assignment we ever had in that class was talked about during the first month of class. We were told to think about an event that would precipitate a Nazi-style series of events with a Nazi-style regime being the outcome. The professor told us that we didn't have to write it down or anything, but we were told to think of how a Nazi Germany psychology could take over and what it would feel like, or something to that effect. As we talked more and more about Nazi Germany he brought up the homework assignment. The purpose, in my opinion was to think like they did.

Good assignment.

As we finished watching "Triumph of the Will," the professor wanted us to think about what would have to happen, what kind of event, or act, for a military style leadership to take over (and I think it was understood that it meant having a big war economy too).
He said that an event that would unleash a Nazi-style system couldn't kill a huge number of people, rather (and I am paraphrasing from the best of my memory) it had to kill around 3,000 or 4,000 --a Pearl Harbor type number of deaths. The professor more than likely said it would be blamed on someone, and would be an excuse to go to war and build up a huge war machine. Economics, i believe was a reason for this type of thing. Perhaps as a way to spur economic growth, a la Hitler's Germany.
This took place in the last few days during the week before September 11th. He also wanted us to think about where these events would likely have to take place to get the desired effects. It is at this time that someone from class said something to effect of, like an Operation Northwoods? I forgot what the Professor said but he definitely did not deny that type of possibility.

Good. Northwoods is right on target.

On the friday before September 11th (and i believe for a few days before that) we were recommended to look up the Reichstag fire. I guess as part of the Psychology of Evil homework assignment (that wasn't to be turned in, only thought about). On second thought, the homework assignment very well may have been something to have been written down to turn in but, later on, it was not.
On that friday of September 7, when we finished watching "Triumph of the will" he also said that we would not have class that Monday because he had to do something (or go to something somewhere). So the next class would be September 12th.

Intriguing!

The professor's name was David Houston. He had also taught at other places. He looked a little like a Nazi, but he wasn't that old, so perhaps his look meant that he was/is a Jesuit, or that he knows a lot about that style of thinking. His was also the first class that the Problem, Reaction, Solution theme was talked about. It may have been referred to as the Hegelian Dialectic.

I do not have any of my notes from this class, but I obviously remember the main points. Mainly, I have tried to put things together and figure things out for the last six years.

One last comment: On the morning of September 11 at my college the school's ecumenical priest (pastor) talked to the school in the center of campus. He was, I guess, used for traumatic events. He said something to the effect of, "a tragic thing has happened, and we will find out why." He wanted us to get an understanding of it --well, I guess they wanted us to share the official "understanding" of the events. The tone wasn't so much as outrage and utter disbelief, but one of acceptance of what happened and a tiny hint of "is there something that America did to deserve this?" It felt more planned than spontaneous. It was more of a controlled response, without any genuine righteous indignation.

Makes sense.

This was always puzzling to me; why an ecumenical priest/minister talked to us and not a Presbyterian preacher (Rhodes is nominally a Presbyterian school), and the way in which it was done. The controlled response was almost too controlled in my opinion. The tv's were all supposed to stay on so we could get the whole traumatic, desired effect.

Rhodes University is most assuredly controlled by high-level Freemasonry as is the Black Moorehouse College in Atlanta from where M. L. King graduated.

I am sorry for the length of this email, and I know you are very busy, but I would like to get your thoughts and comments on these subjects. I would love to hear back from you!
Also, in my opinion, it is good to get a snapshot of what people were doing before, during, and after 9-11, and to not rely on the official party line.

This is very alerting to investigators. I would find any connection of Rhodes to the CFR, Freemasonry or the Knights of Malta. David Houston must be thoroughly investigated. He obviously knew the events that were about to happen. Bing a racial Jew (as are many Armenians, they being the offspring of the ten tribes taken captive into that area by Assyria in 756 BC), you have a God-given sense of impending danger, especially when that danger is targeted against your people. Follow your gut feelings and investigate your leads. They will bring you to the truth of Rome being behind 911 and David Houston seems like a coadjutor indeed!

Thank you and God bless,

Mark Yacoubian

Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric

Thankyou
Craig Oxley

http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=34397