This is one of the most controversial stories in the year of 2009. George Tiller was murdered by an evil gunmen. The suspect of the murder is named Scott Roeder. Tiller was killed outside of his own church called the Reformation Lutheran Church in Wichita, Kansas. He was murdered just after 10 am. Roeder has no connection with the mainstream media at all, yet some in the mainstream media is trying to equate what Scott did to pro-lifers. That's a lie since being pro-life isn't about murdering people even someone like Tiller. Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards, Vicki Saporta, the president of the National Abortion Federation, and others have collectively blamed pro-lifers in general for Tiller's death. DailyKos had an article saying that Scott was a pro-life activist when he wasn't. Ex-CIA agent Markos Moulitsas, of the DailyKos, compared O'Reilly's and Beck's views to the Murder of Tiller (and that they incide Scott to kill Tiller. That was wrong and I don't even agree with O'Reilly or Beck on every issue). The truth is that George Tiller was a murderer of the unborn during late term. Under his watch, over 60,000 unborn babies were murdered. He was accused of performing illegal late term abortions also. NBC is trying to link O'Reilly's words to Tiller's death, which is a lie. See, abortion is about murdering an innocent baby. On MSNBC, Dr. Warren Hern, a fellow abortionist and friend of Tiller, compared pro-lifers to the Taliban. Hern is a liar since the Taliban killed innocent people, threw acid into women's eyes, and formed a theocracy. Real pro-lifers don't advocate none of these things at all. Real pro-lifers enact real debate and peaceful protests worldwide to outline their positions. Tiller also kept many women in ill conditions to be murdered of their babies. He did abortions on women who hadn't given consent, at the behest of their parents or boyfriends. He left a baby blind, paralyzed, and mentally retarded by injecting formaldehyde into her brain. Murdering Tiller is wrong, but George Tiller's genocide was equal as evil as well. Local prosecutors had expected to bring Roeder before a court today to officially file charges, but it appears their investigation will continue today and that it will be tomorrow before that happens. According to the Kansas City Star, the FBI suspected Roeder of having ties with the Montana Freemen, a militia group, which had standoffs with authorities. Investigators believe that he had ties to anti-government militia groups, yet even true militias don't advocate randomly murdering people at all. Roeder is 51 years old and he is charged with George Tiller's murder. Some believe that Scott may have some mental illness according to his ex-wife. He held extremist views. Pro life groups worldwide (even Operation Rescue) have condemned the murder as evil. Tiller certainly murdered the unborn. So, the pro-life movement will have to fight back since those that love death will exploit Tiller's death to promote their agenda.
GM is actively going into bankruptcy. The catch is that the Obama administration is taking General Motors by the hand to lead them in a bankruptcy process. GM are to reorganize in the government led bankruptcy plan. GM is an about a century old automaker battered by the economic downturn, mounting debt and management problems. GM wil file for bankruptcy. The move will give the government a 60 percent ownership stake and an unprecendented role in reshaping the auto industry. The move will give the government a 60 percent ownership stake and an unprecendented role in reshaping the auto industry. Fascism is when the government owns enough of a privately held company that it can severely regulate the company. Once the government weeds out the unprofitable divisions of General Motors, you can expect that their officials will begin to sell back the streamlined company to private investors. Yet, the government can still control a large part of the corporation. That's fascism. Fascism is the merging of the government with select corporations to control a society. President Barack Obama announced the plan for supporting General Motors as it goes into bankruptcy protection. He wants to send billions of dollars into GM as well. Government control over privately-owned companies can be called Socialism; but, when the government allows executives of these companies to retain day-to-day operational control, that is Fascism. The government believes that this plan can be sucessful. There was the Chrysler bankruptcy plan as well. If successful, GM will emerge as a leaner company with a smaller work force, fewer plants and a trimmed dealership network. The catch with fascism is that there will be less competitors producing the same product or offering the same services. Free enterprise has been placed under the backburner for decades now in America. This has occured with the FED controlling much of our money supply and the bad trade deals that inhibits fair trade in the world. The Constitution says that the people and individuals have most of the power in the country of America not multinational corporations at all. There is tight government control and a private retention of day to day operations during the ordering process. The new world order combine elements of communism and fascism together to create a globalized state.
Martial Law is being trained and prepared for nationwide now. There are Marines training "civilians" to accept the coming martial law. There is a photo of U.S. Marines participating in a practice raid on Flushing Meadows Park with a CH-46 helicopter to demonstrate for civilians the tactics the U.S. Marine Corps uses while they raiding an area in a territory on May 25, 2009. The Marines are assigned to the 6th Marine Regiment's 2nd Battalion. The demonstration involved Fleet Week 2009 activities. An U.S. Marine Corps photo was provided by Lance Cpl. Carl Payne. On May 23, 2009, the Staten Island Real-Time News reported on “mock raids at the public park to give civilians a feel for how soldiers operate in battle.” Some have accused these raids of preparing people what it will be like under the presence of uniformed (and armed soldiers) in their midst of martial law. Ironically, the Marines characterized Flushing Meadows Parks as "enemy territory." The truth is that a local in an area filled with American citizens isn't enemy territory. That place is apart of American soil. There is a huge difference. In fact, according to many leaders of the military, the entire United States is "enemy territory" is in need of martial law. I don't agree with that assumption. There is the World Bank head and globalist Robert Zoellick saying that he warned that the banker contrived "stimulus" will not stem rising unemployment and forestall "political unrest across the globe." Increasing poverty and the coming fire sale of corporations and infrastructure here in the former land of the free and brave will be a “political combustible issue,” according to Zoellick and the World Bank loan sharking operation. The CH-46 helicopters in public spaces can be a combustive situation if martial law occurs. Certainly, we can hope that martial law can never occur in America. Threats of martial law is still going on. For over 15 years, the military have illegally trained in urban plus rural areas in training drills. This has occured in Oakland, California and to the small towns of North Carolina (where even black helicopters have trained). These things occur in order to prepare people for the further militarization of U.S. society.
Hate Crimes Legislation are being opposed by Southern Baptist leaders. The head of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission has written to Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, calling on him to battle approval of a "hate crimes" bill, which critics have called "The Pedophile Protection Act." Critics of the bill want the GOP Senate Judiciary Committee leader to fight the bill. The bill of course has been supported by the Masonic ADL and the Masonic B'nai B'rith Lodge. Both groups are known for their far left politics (i.e. Their leadership are anti-gun and pro-abortion). Richard Land (who is apart of the Southern Baptist Church) is a CFR member and has ties to the U.N., so he isn't to be trusted 100%. He may interesting points on the bill. He disagreed with the S. 909 (or the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act), because it would add new categories of violent crimes. In other words, it would punish people harsher who assault those of a specific sexual orientation (or gender identity) than people who assault a heterosexual (or those without gender identity issues). President Barack Obama supports the hate crimes legislation. The reality is that laws already exist the prosecute individuals who enact violence against anyone for any reason. The hate crime legislation gives special protections to certain citizens, which is contrary to the 14th Amendment (which grants equal protection under the law). Hate crime laws gives judges the right to determine what the perpetrators are thinking, which is difficult to do at times. Some believes that hate crimes legislation can violate religious liberty rights (because similar laws in other countries violated religious liberty rights of Christians in the UK, Sweden, and Canada. I've known this for years). As WND has reported, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 would provide special protections to homosexual people but leave Christian ministers open to prosecution should their teachings be linked to any subsequent offense, by anyone, against a homosexual person. An analysis by Shawn D. Akers, policy analyst with Liberty Counsel said the proposal, formally known as H.R. 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act bill in the House and S. 909 in the Senate, would create new federal penalties against those whose "victims" were chosen based on an "actual or perceived ... sexual orientation, gender identity." Some have called the bill a pedophile protection act since the bill doesn't explicitly ban pedophilia and other phillas as apart of a protected sexual class. The bill exists when hate crimes based on bias and prejudice are decreasing than 10 years ago. Yet, this fact doesn't mean we should take a blind eye to violence against anyone though. The majority Democrats refused to ban pedophilia in the hate crimes bill. Richard Land said that leaves the definition up to a standard definition in the medical field, which includes hundreds of "philias" and "isms" that would be protected. Porter cited the amendment offering from King in committee that was very simple: "The term sexual orientation as used in this act or any amendments to this act does not include pedophilia." But majority Democrats refused to accept it. Critics also have expressed alarm because in committee hearings Democrats admitted that a Christian pastor could be prosecuted under the law if he spoke biblically against homosexuality, someone heard the comments and then committed a crime. Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., a "hate crimes" supporter, confirmed that worry, saying: "This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these 'philias' and fetishes and 'ism's' that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule…" The reality is that we don't need hate crimes legislation. We need is more enforcement of laws against violence (for any reason whatsoever), education about lifestyles, and the promotion of true individual liberty for all people (regardless of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or gender identity). All humans deserve equal rights, but not special rights. Homosexuality like adultery in the Word of God is called a sin. We can agree to disagree on lifestyle choices as apart of Freedom of Speech, but we have no right to be violent toward anyone.
Gitmo has been a controversial subject in the world. There is a video from Cenk Uygur of the Young Turks (from their radio show on Sirius) where he talks about Col. Ralph Peters. Peters calls for the murder of detainees held at Gitmo, which I don't agree with. Uygur typically follows the left/right paradigm by calling people like Peters right wing. Right wing is usually used as a perogative. Actually, people like Raph Peters are radical neo cons or fake conservatives. Peters was an military intelligence analyst who spoke on FOX News, PBS, and CNN (as all of these network are heavily influenced by the CFR spewing propaganda). Back in 2006, Col. Ralph Peters calls for the redrawing of the borders in the Middle East. Early this year, he said that Afghanistan was a waste of time (and that the U.S. should go punitive on the native people there). I don't believe Afghanistan is a waste of time. Even it was, why did America invade it in the first place in 2001. He even advocated killing “partisan” journalists last month. So, Peters is an extremist who wants mass murder, which relates to crimes against humanity. There was a segment where FOX's Neil Cavuto telling Peters that some of the detainees might be innocent (when Peters said that the people in Gitmo should of been slaughtered in the film. Peters said that people there deserved to die, which is Satanic and evil). Sure, he says, there will be “miscarriages of justice” but we shouldn’t let that get in the way of killing Muslims. “We are better off killing known terrorists on the spot,” he argues. A “dead terrorist poses a lot less legal problems down the road.” In other words, kill ‘em all and let God sort ‘em out. Now, it's been found that none of the detainees in Guantanamo Bay are senior or high level operatives of Al-Qaeda at all. This has been confirmed by interviews, dozens of high level military, intelligence figures, and law enforcement officials (in America, Europe, and the Middle East). According to the New York Times on June 21, 2004: “They said only a relative handful — some put the number at about a dozen, others more than two dozen — were sworn Qaeda members or other militants able to elucidate the organization’s inner workings.” Even the CIA admitted, that only some of the detainees were low level recruits. Yet, innocent men swept up in the chaos of the war. They lived in the country of Afghanistan when the CIA/ISI created Taliban plus Al-Qaeda fought battles. As it turns out, according to military tribunal documents released under an Associated Press FIOA, many of the men currently at Gitmo were sold to the United States for bounties. Most are completely innocent of any crime. Even Barack Obama is executing similar neo-con policies like Bush and Peters. There are an increasing of bombings in Afghanistan and Pakistan with Obama than Bush in the time of his administration (when Bush invaded Afghanistan). “Simple arithmetic reveals that the eleven days under the Obama clock were 18-50% more deadly for Afghan civilians than the twenty days under the Bush regime,” writes Marc W. Herold. Barack Obama is puppet of the establishment doing these bomings. So, the detainees don't deserved to be murdered since most of them of innocent of any crime. The war on terror now is trying to be more slick with more people (with mostly Muslims dying). This contrived war on terror has killed more than 1 million Iraqis and subjected people to misery. Obama and his puppet masters are directly responsible for the massive humanitarian crisis now unfolding in Pakistan’s Swat Valley. More than two million refugees need urgent help, according to the Red Cross. So, the evils in attacking Pakistan is continuing unless people will expose these evils more in our society.
Michael New from June 1, 2009 described about the Professors of Robert George and Douglas Kmiec debating the issue of abortion. Dr. New is a political science professor at the University of Alabama and holds a Ph.D. from Stanford University. There was a debate between George and Kmiec. It occured on Thursday at May 27th at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. The discussion was moderated by Mary Ann Glendon, who is the Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Professor Glendon said at the opening remarks that this was a discussion and not a debate. She hoped that the dialogue would promote an informed opinion on the pro-life community in relation to the Barack Obama administration. She wanted both Professor George and Professor Kmiec to explore whether pro-lifers could find common ground with the Obama administration on life issues. Professor Kmiec opened the dialogue with a very wide ranging opening statement. He tried to argue that over arching issues (like the environment and foreign policy. He agreed that Obama's stem cell policy was a reasonable compromise, which was false) should be embraced along with the sanctity of human life. Kmiec refused to respect the sanctity of embryonic human life. Professor George spent his opening statement describing the vivid and stark contrasts between President Obama’s record and the goals and objectives of the pro-life movement. In particular, Professor George detailed Barack Obama’s record as a state legislator, U.S. Senator, and President. George said that Obama supported the FOCA, which could eliminate all pro-life laws nationwide. He feels that Barack Obama is incrementally trying to undermine all pro-life efforts in America. In particular, Professor George found it telling that while the Obama administration wants to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies but never directly expresses an interest in lowering the number of abortions. He concluded by saying that since the Obama administration does not think that fetal life is worthy of legal protection, finding common ground will be very difficult, if not impossible. Later Professors George and Kmiece each took questions. Kmeic was evasive to Mary Ann Glendon's question about FOCA. Professor George says that the magnitude of abortion outweighs all other injustices. George was right to point out the science clearly proves that human life begins at conception (and we shouldn't deny personhood among human beings). Professor George also responded to a question by saying that the breaking of bones and the shedding of blood describe the reality of abortion. Furthermore, science has concluded that from the embryonic state, we have a human. As such our dispute is not about science, but rather the principles of justice. He ended his remarks by saying that every member of the human family deserves equal dignity. It's clear that Professor George won the debate since he comprehensively proved that the Barack Obama administration has a long way in promoting common ground on abortion (and that human life deserves protection from conception unto death).
Edible Vaccines and Flying syringes are existing in the 21st century now. Daniel Taylor from Old-thinker News on June 1, 2009 outline this reality. Genetically modified foods came about and the biotech industry hailed tomatoes as being frost resistant (and round up ready crops existed). There is now a further development in the biotech world that the mainstream media isn't discussing that much. GM food safety have caused concerns among environmental and health experts. New technologies are being developed to turn foods into a vaccine delivery system. Some claim that this will equate into positive results for mankind. Yet, the establishment will surely exploit this invention in order to spread faster edible vaccine technology. Even in 1996, the Rockefeller Foundation gave grant moeny for early research on edible vaccines. The $58,000 grant, given to the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research at Cornell University, was aimed at developing and transferring edible vaccine technology to developing countries. Once the President of the Boyce Thompson Institute, Charles Arntzen suggested that bananas would be used as edible vaccines in developing countries. These vaccines were being used in Mexico with the grant. By 1998, the Boyce Thompson Institute became the first to develop genetically modified potatoes that were successfully tested on human subjects. The potatoes were formed by transgenic implantation. That is when a gene is transfered from one species to another. One gene for a bacterial antigen is a protein that stimulates that the production of protective antibodies was inserted into potato cells. American kids can recieve this vaccine (in the near future) that's edible not just those in developed nations. Iowa State University research “…may someday allow pigs and humans to get a flu vaccination simply by eating corn or corn products,” reports ISU. “The corn vaccine would also work in humans when they eat corn or even corn flakes, corn chips, tortillas or anything that contains corn, said Harris.” Mass vaccination is a means to use edible vaccines. There are even calls for statins and lithium to be placed in tap water. Some of these dangerous pharmaecutical ingredients are in our water supply now. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently gave a $100,000 grant to a Japanese research program aimed at genetically engineering mosquitoes to act as “flying syringes” to deliver vaccines. The Rockefeller Family, Bill Gates, and other billionares have promoted population control for years. They met in secret in NYC to condone such actions. These same foundations and the Rockefeller Foundation have discussed social engineering and molecular sciences. Population control plots using chemicals have been documented for years. In 1989 research was conducted by the National Institute of Immunology in New Delhi India into the use of hCG conjugated Tetanus and Diphtheria vaccines as a method of birth control. The research discussed the use of Tetanus and Diphtheria ‘carriers’ to bypass the immune system and deliver the female hormone called human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). The problem was that these vaccines caused problems in people living in the Third World. Some of these vaccines can harm people. GM foods and other technologies are increasingly used as a solution to world hunger and food cries. Yet, GM foods have risk factors that organic researchers have documented. Some speculate that edible vaccines can be a tool for some for birth control and population control plans in the developed world. Population reduction has been a goal of the global elite and their billionaire philanthropists admit to wanting the world population to be lowered by over 90%. Technology like many things can be utilized for good or evil purposes. We will have to be careful that future technologies can be legitimately used in our lives.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment