More Updates on the Tea Party Movement

There are anarchists that want to disrupt the April 15 Tea Party protests. These anarchists have been synonymous with many time on government agents provocateurs. They want to crash Tea Party events. Some of the anarchists for years have been caught masquerading as anti-government activists. They often attack real people who oppose the policies of the government. It's also true that for eons the governments enacts false flag operations. The group claim to anarchists, but they are really radicals form the Left side of the Left/Right paradigm. They call the Tea Party people collectively as racists, fascists, and call anyone respecting the Second Amendment gun freaks. These liars are refuted by the fact that gun rights protected this country historically from tyranny. Also, just because a man or woman respects individual liberty doesn't mean that person is a fascist or a bigotry. These hypocrites are in no right to lecture to anyone about tolerance when their ilk provocateur in violence in many demonstrations spanning over 15 years at least. These anarchists can't get their fact straight since the Tea Party movement existed as the Boston Tea Party in December of 2008 (from Libertarians). “The Libertarian Party of Illinois got the idea to hold an April 15, 2009 anti-tax ‘Boston Tea Party’ in Chicago way back in December of 2008. On February 10, 2009 they started a Facebook page and began promoting the website throughout the Illinois media,” writes Donny Ferguson of the Libertarian National Committee. “Of course, for the Libertarian Party every day is a Tea Party. We’ve been the only consistently pro-taxpayer party since our founding over 30 years ago.” I don't agree with all of the views of libertarianism, but that's their views. Ironically, anarchists oppose government (since anarchism comes form the Greek word anarchos meaning without rulers) yet the corporate anarachists you see on TV today mostly support the Left side of the Left/Right paradigm. Some Tea Party people have shown evil, bigoted signs, but not all of them. Libertarians certainly aren't fascists either. Anarchists fought fascism in Spain and Italian. Now so-called anarchists specialize in making anti-war demonstrations look like a re-run of the Days of Rage in 1969. Anarchists think they are fighting the state by smashing windows at McDonalds and providing the corporate media with scary images of black-clad youths trashing bank lobbies. What they are really doing is given the elite even more power to pass even more oppressive, anti-liberty laws. This anarchist group wants to have this goal of: "...Get individual tea party protesters to leave the right-wing and move to the left politically..." This group is called Infoshop and they are probably funded by CFR member George Soros. See, this isn't about liberty. This group wants control and everyone to believe in what they believe in. I won't do that. They claim to be for the people, but desire to support eugenics style abortion, believe in scapegoating all libertarians plus conservatives, and try to intimidate people that disagree with their agenda. They are right that social services that help those in need ought not to be eliminated especially in this time since people will surely suffer (some people will die in the streets). There certainly is nothing wrong with helping small businesses to create wealth and government fairly using its powers, but oppressing the poor is not a real humanitarian way in leading a nation. Some Tea Party individuals like some of these anarchists have been infiltrated by the establishment.

Abortion is not safer than childbirth. Studies prove that abortion is more risky for women. Abortion advocates believe in the life that childbirth is more unsafe than abortion. This has shaped medical practice and even public policy. The elite promote this myth, but more evidence proves this argument as out of date, false, and inaccurate. People have questioned the conclusions of some people supporting abortion. Evidence contradicts the claim that mortality rates for women having abortions are lower than mortality rates for women giving birth. Abortion harms women by exposing them to a wide range of serious risk, both immediate and long term. Abortion therefore isn't safer than childbirth. Medical knowledge in the old era played a role to legalize abortion via the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973. The decision made a structure to regulate abortions depending on the trimester of a woman's pregnancy. The court claimed that this dealt with the health of the pregnant woman and the protection of the "potentiality of human life." The court didn't view the unborn child as human, but solely a fetus (in a viability stage). Roe allowed the states to regulate abortions in the trimesters depending on health, viability, and the doctor's decision. The Court cited, but did not analyze in its opinion, seven articles related to maternal mortality in favor of the view that abortion is safer than childbirth. Contrary data was presented to the Court, but not used. No information on any other medical risks of abortion was considered. 37 years later, there are advances in medical knowledge and capabilities. The risks of abortion deal with maternal health, fetal viability, the impact of legalization of aboriton on maternal health, and other short term plus long term consequences of abortion. As a result, we now know more about the harm to women and children that abortion inflicts.



Some census workers have harassed local officials and have taken possessions of the homeless. The census is in the Constitution and it can give aid to improve communities. Yet, it's wrong fro federal and local authorities using the census as an excuse for implementing "river" sweeps to issue code violations and seize personal property of homeless people in California. Some census people want to go into parks to try to get information. Some of them have cut up tents. There are news about the preist scandal of the Catholic Church in 2010. It's been found that at least 200 deaf boys have been molested by a priest. Yet, this priest weren't defrocked by the Catholic Church at all. The New York Times reported that the Vatican officials like Pope Benedict XVI were apart of the decision. The situation became public because of a lawsuit that revealed a correspondence between Wisconsin Bishiops and the future pope Chardinal Joseph Ratzinger. 5 men are suing the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. The letters show that Ratzinger was more concerned about protecting the church from scandal than the welfare of the children. He and other officials didn't alert the authorities. They didn't even discipline the priests involved in sexual abuse while he served as the Vatican's doctrinal enforcer. The American priest Lawrence C. Murphy served at Wisconsin's St. John School for the Deaf from 1950 to 1974. He first taught classes and became effective at raising money for deaf causes and was eventually promoted to run the school in 1963. This is done even though church officials already knew he sexually abused children. A group of deaf of former students spent decades trying to get something changed. They even sent fliers outside the Milwaukee cathedral. Later, an internal investigation of Murphy proved that he wasn't remorseful and he appealed to Ratzinger for leniency. He died in 72 and he was buried in his priestly garments. So, the sick pedophile priests ought to have justice and experience jail time for their own crimes. These stories are representative of the nefarious fruits of the Roman Catholic Church.

History proves that legitimate govenrment is necessary to protect the people. History also proves that too much governmental power in the lives of the people can cause tyranny. One example is how the Cops and CPS seized a child form parents for "mistrusting government." This family is from Williamson County, Austin. They lost custody of their 7 year old son. The Child Protective Service are investigating the issue. They believe that the child's parents taught the child to mistrust the government. This act is hardly illegal or unwarranted. Yet, this act caused the CPS to deem the parents unsuitable according to charges leveled by police officers in CPS documents. This is fascism 21st century style. There is no other description for this deed, but fascism. The parents are drug reform activist filmmakers Barry and Candi Cooper. Their home were recently raided and searched by the police. Authorities believe that Cooper's voice was heard in the background of an allegedly false police report. “Once in the couple’s home, officers discovered a small amount of marijuana and charged the Coopers with Class B misdemeanors, resulting in both their arrests. Each immediately bonded out of jail and paid a small fine. Days later, while Candi’s youngest son was visiting his father in east Texas, Child Protective Services contacted the Coopers, revealing that the incident could cost them not only custody of the boy, but also their freedom on felony child endangerment charges,” writes Stephen C. Webster of True Slant, who has been following the case. The page five of the CPS case report showed the police leveling the shocking claim that the Coopers are unsuitable parents, because they teach their children that the government is out to harm them. Page six of the report accuse the Coopers of being aggressive to authority. The Founding fathers were aggressive against the British colonialists, but anything people stand up as humans against tyranny today is falsely called terrorism by some individuals. This page said they didn't allow government employees to enter home without a court order, which they should do. Travis County Deputy District Attorney Dayna Blazey said that the Coopers are fit to be parents, their children are happy plus healthy, etc. The kids weren't in risk according to Blazey. Williamson County believes that the police claim that the Coopers allow their children and friends to use drugs in the house. Ominously, police also characterize the Coopers educating their children that the drug war is evil as an act of ‘mental abuse’. The Drug War has been made into an evil excuse to violate rights while limiting legitimate reforms to assist those with real drug addiction. The real reason why Barry Cooper (who was a former police officer and a Drug Enforcement Agent) is targeted is because of his politics. Cooper tries to catch police engaged in corruption and other criminal acts especially as it relates to the Drug War. He had an underground DVD called "Never Get Busted Again." This teaches people how to react to police oppression. Cooper dedicated a recent You Tube video featuring him and his wife to their son, in which they discussed the raid and the attempt to seize 7-year-old Zach. “In my 19 years of experience with criminal defense matters, a search warrant for a misdemeanor charge is certainly unusual,” wrote Minnesota attorney Maury D. Beaulier, who had no prior knowledge of the Coopers’ case. “It indicates to me that this is a targeted investigation. It may be targeted because it is believed to be a part of a greater crime or conspiracy, or, perhaps, because there are political motivations at work.” The Coopers didn't succeed in trying to get custody back of their 7 year old son named Zachary. Zachary is raised by his father, who didn't have previously custody of the child. Barry has been barred form any contact with him whatsoever. The Coopers faced losing total custody of their child entirely. Barry said that this is the most horrible thing done to him in his life. The police in this instance wants the public and parents who teach a distrust of government (that was written and spoken off by the Founding Fathers), etc. should have their kids seized by the CPS. This is a new level of thought police tyranny that's extremely similar to the acts occuring in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This is all the more reason for us to not sell out to the establishment and not be ashamed of what we believe in.

Secret Societies are to this day. The influence of the Knights Templar exist in Freemasonry today. For example, many degrees in the Masonic York Rite degree was known as the Order of the Knights Templar. Albert Pike admitted that the Knights Templar has an overt and covert policies to promote decisions in the world. This strategy is found in the Roman Catholic Church and the Order of Freemasonry. Both use charity as an excuse to promote their secret goal of trying to dominate the political and economic influences in the world. Freemasonry is a secret order that uses a wide spectrum of doctrines from ancient Egyptian ideals, Pythagorean doctrines, and influence from the Kabbalah too. When the Grand Lodge was formed in 1717, Freemasonry came out in the open public and they spread globally. Freemasonry came to be called by some as pro-Protestant, but they actually infiltrated the Protestants in order to promote Ecumenicalism. This cause some leaders in the Church of England, Lutherans, and even some Baptists to accept Romanism in Ecumenical unity. Certainly, this why the Vatican is supportive of the Ecumenical Movement via Vatican II. Also, they support some doctrines of figures like Karl Marx, Galileo, Darwin, and Oscar Wilde (as written by Richard Owen). There are also international bankers that have stolen wealth from the people to enrich their own pocket (while safeguards, standards, and legitimate parts of society have broken down especially during the recession). NAPOLEON said: "When a government is dependent for money upon the bankers, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes.... financiers are without patriotism and without decency..." This is why economic populism is extremely popular among the 21st century.

By Timothy