Late Summer Stores in 2010

Later Summer Stories in Late 2010

It's been a hot summer and the truth hasn't cooled off though. Fall is transpiring very soon. Events swril around in this day and age. This is a highly technological world and many people are waking up as information fluidly advance. It can be good thing to embrace real technologies. Technology ought not to be manipulated to advance nepotism either. The WikiLeaks scandal and other cultural changes in the world are interesting developments. Yet, the same goals of liberty, and equality are still fixed here (that we should all share and promote). The BP disaster is still going on with the well being filled with concrete. The media says that all U.S. combat troops are out of Iraq. Yet, military bases are still in Iraq that are controlled by the U.S. Although, it is fine to allow troops from bridages to come home. John McCain is easily a political shill today. He's apart of the CFR or the Council on Foreign Relations. Now, John McCain introduced 2 bills in the Senate. They are Machiavellian. One is S.3081. It will authorize the federal government to detain American citizens indefinitely without a trial. S.3002 is a bill that would authorize the federal government to regulate vitamins, minerals, and virutally all health plus natural food products. According to Examiner.com, “John McCain introduced a bill into the U.S. Senate which, if passed, would actually allow U.S. citizens to be arrested and detained indefinitely, all without Miranda rights or ever being charged with a crime.” The Examiner reports says that the bill isn't conservative at all. It would take away our right to trial. It would allow the federal government to arrest and imprison anyone the current administration deems "hostile." Recently, the DHS called veterans, retired law enforcment, Ron Paul & Chuck Baldwin supporters, and conservatives as equivalent to terrorists. McCain has issues with promoting our Constitution. People have the right to a speedy trial by jury and the constitutional right to habeas corpus. Not one of these rights should be invalidated under the names of national security and the war on terrorism. On February 3, 2010, John McCain introduced to the United States Senate the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010. This act compares supplements to radioactive enriched uranium. Vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and botanicals can help people. The Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 has supporters from many liberals in Congress. It allows the FDA to have broad new powers that Europe has. It approved supplements that the government allows. There is nothing wrong with legitimate oversight, but not equating vitamins to poisions. McCain wants a tougher global warming treaty. He claims to be for economic populism, but he won't condemn derivatives. McCain told the Hoover Institute in May 1, 2007 that if he were President, he would created the international organization of the LD or the League of Democracies. In advancing the LD, McCain said, “We should go further and start bringing democratic peoples and nations from around the world into one common organization, a worldwide League of Democracies.” He then added, “The new League of Democracies would form the core of an international order . . .” The LD would be similar to the U.N. McCain is trying to play both sides of the immigration issue like Lindsey Graham. So, McCain is promoting policies that are against the constitutional freedoms and liberties that people respect and love.

Iran is desperate in trying to make accomodations to prevent a war in that nation. Iran is offering America chance to build nuclear power plants. The Obama administration probably won't take Iran on its offer. Iran doesn't benefit if it uses nuclear technology for military uses, but the neo cons still want to invade Iran. The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said that Iran is ready to cooperate with any nation (even America) in building nuclear power plants in Iran. This has been exposed in Press TV. He want these facilities to encorporate high standards. This can cuase more competition among different countries according to Ramin. These economic projects are not convincing among some who want a reckless attack in Iran. In May of 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dismissed an offer made by Iran to swap some of its enriched uranim for reactor feul. Clinton said that the Iranian offer (this was an attmpet to prevent the bombing of Iran) was jsut a transparent ploy to avoid a fresh round of U.N. Security Council sanctions on Iran. The swap offer was negotiated by Brazil and Turkey, which are opposed to new U.N. sanctions on Iran.

Iran has not dabbled in a nuclear weapons program since 2003 and according to a U.S. intelligence report issued in 2007 is not likely to be able to produce enough enriched uranium for a bomb until 2010 to 2015. Some in Israel and America don't care about the facts. Some of them want Iran to not develop nuclear technology, but create a pretext of war in Iran. The neo cons expressed their intensions of doing this before even 9/11. This is similar to Hitler's Mein Kampf. This PNAC document have proposed the war in Iraq and the Iraqi war killed over 1 million people. This document says that: "...Over the long term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests in the [Persian] Gulf as Iraq has. And even should U.S.-Iranian relations improve, retaining forward-based forces in the region would still be an essential element in U.S. security strategy given the longstanding American interests in the region,” the neocons stated in Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century, dated September, 2000. Republicans and Democrats support the pro-neo AIPAC grou pas well. AIPAC and its allies promote the deception that Iran wants to create a nuclear bomb to attack Israel. That would be a death wish on the Iranian nation if they attempt to do this. The Bush era neocons and some in Congress realize that Iran can't build a nuclear weapon now. Iran isn't going to preemptively attack Israel even with conventional weapons. Iran isn't run by nihilistic or those with a death wish. Some believe that Israel and America will attack Iran (for the reason of making it a puppet state of the West). Iraq was leveled, it civil infrastructure was harmed, etc. Its population is now witnessing disease, malnutrition, and cancer created by depleted uranium. That is why the Pentagon under Bush targeted Iraq's water and sanitation system. That is why hospitals and schools were targeted when they aren't a military threat. So, if Iran is bombed, civilian places will be targeted not just military locations. The criminal neo cons want Iran to be harmed. Both Republicans and Democrats are talking about invasion in a bi-partisan affair.

Some believe that Google wants to takeover the Internet to make it malleable for its own ends. There is the net neutrality ending deal with Verison going on. The Internet should be free and open. People shouldn't control the Internet under the elite and force independent media websites, radio, and TV shows to cease to exist permanently. Verizon made an agreement with Verizon to speed certain Internet content to users. This opens the door to the complete sterilizaiton of the net as a force for political change. Google's plan according to its critics is to make the Internet seem like cable TV. This is where independent voices will be silenced and the entire Internet will be brough up by transational media giants. People who want to run a simple blog will be priced out of existence online TV, and radio show will cease to exist as the Internet is slowly being swallowed up by the corporate borg. True net neturality deals with independent news outlets who attract an audience (by telling that the truth can compete with corporate giants like ABC, CBS, and CNN). The Google/Verizon pact will end that level playing field and in turn eliminate everything that is outside of the mainstream. “A non-neutral Internet means that companies like AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and Google can turn the Net into cable TV and pick winners and losers online,” writes Josh Silver. Silver said tht ending net neutrality will make the net act like a limited accessible information superhighway. Content will be shifted away from the handful of massive media corporations that currently control the television and radio dial. That Internet will cause people to pay money to get in on it. It's like a cyber toll road. The pact gives Google and huge ISPs the power to block certain websites on wireless networks. Some have concerns that this can set the stage for the CIA back Total Information awareness program to monitor Twitter acounts, blogs, and websites (plus other websites left by individual users) aiming to use the data to predict the future including controlling the behavior plus lives of people. Google CEO Eric Schmidt in conjunction with the CIA is trying to be the ultimate Big Brother clique that will: "...will know so much about its users that the search engine will be able to help them plan their lives” by constantly tracking their location via smart phones and telling them where to go and what to do. Google have long lins with government spy networks. Google is one of the corporations that work with the govenrment to promote the cybersecurity agenda that wants to limit the free Internet. Google have worked with the NSA and the CIA. There has been the recent scandal of the company's street view roaming vehicles accessing the wi-fi details of internet users. They are mapping their online activities and have raised serious questions over intelligence links and abuse of privacy laws. The free Internet shouldn't end and we should fight for it.

The Arizona Law & Propaganda

　

A Judge in Arizona halts parts of the controversial immigration law. This law is controversial in Arizona. Many people are fleeing the state for fears of being arrested. People know what I feel about the law. I don't agree with it at all. It doesn't deal with border security. The law definitely nullifies the concepts of compassion and human civil liberties. Just because the majority of Americans agree with this immoral law, doesn't make it right. The law forces people to carry papers almost constantly in public. It can even be exploited for profiling when the supporters of the law claim that it has a provision that forbids racial profiling. Legal challenges continue as well. The Law is called SB 1070. U.S. District Judge Susan bolton put on hold many parts of law. They include the reasonable suspicion section that allow the police to arrest and detain suspected illegal immigration without a warrant (and a provision making it illegal for undocumented day laborer to solicit or perform work). Bolton also stayed part of the Arizona law requiring immigrants to carry federal immigration documents. "There is a substantial likelihood that officers will wrongfully arrest legal resident aliens under the new [law]," Bolton ruled. "By enforcing this statute, Arizona would impose a 'distinct, unusual and extraordinary' burden on legal resident aliens that only the federal government has the authority to impose." Other parts of the law will still stand. One is that is is a crime for state officials to interfere with or refrain from enforcement of federal immigration laws. It's illegal to pick up and transport day laborers across the state (or give a ride or to harbor an illegal immigration). A vehicle can be impounded if it's used to transport an illegal immigrant. Bolton wrote that she still wants illegal immigration to be fought against and handle issues of crime (like human trafficking, gun running, etc.). U.S. Justice Department lawyers believe that the law interferes with the ability of the federal government to enforce or set national immigration policy. Yet, the immigration system is broken. The injunction still doesn't end calls for protests or civil disobedience in Arizona. Pearce introduced the Arizona bill. He allied with neo-Nazis before. He's a Mormon and his family participated in the slaughter of Protestants in Utah. Russell Pierce believes in the lie that if you have a class teaching about an ethnic group, then that is a representation of racism. That's a lie of course since sincere ethnic solidarity is never apart of bigotry at all. Offensive raids are already occuring in Arizona plus nationwide too. The Arizona immigration law doesn't deal with border security and laws already exist to handle much of illegal immigration before Brewer signed the bill into law. Brewer was once speechless in her Debate in Arizona.

　

Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Arizona has been exposed as an anti-civil liberty extremist indeed. He supports the immoral Arizona law. Even the court temporarily stopped certain parts of the law as being illegal. He's America's problem not just a problem for Arizona. That is why people want the government to investigate Mariocopa County's Sheriff Arpaio for civil rights violations. There are 30,000 petitioners that desire this to occur. They want judiciary committees of Congress to hold hearings on Arpaio's violations. One advocate of an investigation told a story about a college age Latina. This Latina was harassed and interrogated for just a broken tail light that she accused was racial profiling. She ultimately proved that both she and her mother were U.S. citizens. There are similar stories like this. The U.S. should be govern by law, but sheriffs can arbitrarily create their own laws. Latino Americans have the right to belong in America just like in every other nation on Earth. Arpaio's agenda contracts the essence of civil rights, human decency, etc. He falsely accused his opponent Dan Saban of something back in the 2008 election. He experienced dozens of lawsuits accusing him of serious abuses and gross negligence (that resulted in death and severe injuries to inmates like many who are pregnant, mentally ill, physically handicapped, mentally disabled elderly, and other vulnerable people). Please note that even the convicted inmates in county jails are mostly petty non-violent offenders, since more serious criminals are transferred to the state prison system. Although the federal and state judges and juries seem to be of the opinion that even convicted prisoners probably do not deserve to be chained to chairs and denied needed medications, locked into unventilated outdoor cells in the middle of summer, or subjected to rampant MRSA infections. His wasted millions of dollars as a product of his own abuses costing taxpayers money (which negates his claim of some adherence to fiscal responsibility). These costs as of 2007 has been $41.4 million. He lost his own lawsuits in court. Arpaio treat dogs and cats in his jails better than inmates. He use tent cages on inmates with no air conditioning that can cause the area to exceed over 100 degrees. Animals should be treated with compassion and humans too. The sheriff use costly sweeps against people under the guise of trying to decrease illegal immigration. He loves the attention instead of show concern for the community.

The TV station KPHO is investigating Arizona Governor Jan Brewer. They want to look at her ties between her administration and Corrections Corporation of America (or the CCA). and how the Governor's rhetoric on border security (may be damaging to Arizona's tourism industry for the benefit of the CCA). The federal government allos the private prison industry to house illegal immigratnt detainees. These companies can get contracts with state and local agencies to house illegal immigrants arrested for state violations. The CCA holds the federal contract to house detainees in Arizona. The company bills $11 million per month. 2 of Brewer's top advisers have connections to CCA.

Paul Senseman is the governor’s deputy chief of staff. He is also a former lobbyist for CCA. His wife is listed as a current lobbyist for the company.

Chuck Coughlin is one of the governor’s policy advisers and her campaign chairman. Coughlin’s company, HighGround Public Affairs Consultants, currently lobbies for CCA.

People know that the Texas State school system are promoting textbooks with historical revisionism in them. It sansitizes slavery, sympthatizes with the Confederacy, and promotes American imperialism (under the title of American Exceptionalism). Now, more secrets are coming out about the reactionaries who supported these propaganda textbooks. One textbook architect addressed a neo-nazi rally twice. Republican Daniel Webster is supported by David Barton. Barton is the man who supports the read writing of history in the Texas textbooks. Barton wants a voter guide to promote Republican candidates. Barton claimed that he has accidently addressed the neo-Nazi meetings. Barton believes that America is a Christian nation when even Chris Pinto has a new film exposing some Founding Fathers were occultists and Deists. The documentary film is entitled, "Beyond Blasphemy: The Hidden Faith of Our Founding Fathers." Many people back then did believe in one God and tried to do the right thing, so I want to make that clear. Barton addressed the Rocky Mountain Bible Retreat of Pastor Pete Peters’ Scriptures for America and Kingdom Covenant College in Grants Pass, Oregon, both associated with neo-Nazi ideology. Barton believes that there is no seperation of church and state. Yet, if you unite church and state, it will create an oppressive atmosphere that can violate the rights of people of many faiths (especially those who embrace no faith. People have the right to embrace the freedom of conscience). Rev. Randolph Bracy, president of the Orange County NAACP criticized Barton as well. Barton have made more errors. Earlier this year, he pushed for César Chávez and Thurgood Marshall to be removed from Texas textbooks. Barton argued that civil rights leaders can’t be given credit for civil rights victories because only “majorities” – white people – have the ultimate power to change the law, according to the Washington Monthly. “Only majorities can expand political rights in America’s constitutional society,” he testified. That's blatantly racist, because many minorities have contributed to improvement of society including in the realm of civil rights. Civil rights is fundamentally apart of American history since civil rights is human rights. You can't have an authentic society when any group of people of denied basic human rights. Barton supports Webster against the Democrat Alan Grayson. Grayson made the point about Republican wanting to kill people and other controversial comments. Recently, I am starting to see that some Republicans (not all of them) would want people to die (for the sake of them or Republicans being opposed to anyone recieving any form of governmental assistance). The reactionaries wanted death for eons. That's historical. Grayson is right to point out that Gingrich is a disagrace to assume that let them eat cake Austrian economic philisophy is the way to go.

It's not a secret anymore to see the evil agenda of Planned Parenthood. Abortion on demand has been a evil reality in many communities of America not just one. Back in 2002, I've started to know the real history of Margaret Sanger and the like. Sanger attended socialist meetings, but eugenics isn't apart of egalitarianism at all. Planned Parenthood exploits poverty for profit. They earn billions of dollars globally. Skeptics say we only talk about Sanger. Sanger was an elitist and was married to oil tycoon Noah Slee. She was an adulteress. Margaret Sanger just used birth control as an excuse to promote eugenics (via the Negro Project in promoting the lie that lowering the numbers of African American people would increase the quality of life of the black community. The truth is that a high number of black people in conjunction with strict community intervention plus real programs can increase the standard of living among the black community). According to eugenics, the overall fitness of humankind will be enhanced when people with good genes reproduce and people with bad genes don't. Eugenics is the twisted philosophy that drove Hitler and the Nazis to exterminate about six (6) million Jews. Margaret Sanger's writings are laced with her racist views. In her 1922 book, Pivot of Civilization, Sanger promoted birth control as the best means for improving the genetic stock of mankind. In this book, she specifically called for the segregation of "morons, misfits and the maladjusted" and for the sterilization of "genetically inferior races." Sanger described her utopian view of a master race. There is no master race. All human beings are created equal with that equal value. All humans are made in the image of Almighty God with great worth & dignity too. Nazi supporter and racist Lothrop Stoddard (who wrote the book entitled, "The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy") was a writer in Sanger's magazine. It's a lie to assume that people like me (i.e. Pro-Life individuals) only talk about Sanger in talking about abortion. We talk about Hitler supporting abortion against non-Aryan woman, which was wrong. The Nazis were exposed by authorities of using abortion as apart of war crimes. We expose the NSM 200 document that wanted to use food as a weapon (against Third World nations) to promote population control. People like us expose sterilization forcibly against Native Americans, African Americans, and others worldwide. We expose tons of information on this issue. This information is greatly vital to expose abortion as a cancerous evil. Also, just because we expose abortion on demand, doesn't mean we want to blame women (since tons of women oppose abortion on demand). Now, new research prove that multiple abortions can increase disease and even breast cancer against women. The world isn't overpopulated as population growth as a percentage has decreased since 1960. Researchers see that world population growth will level and fall by 2040 or 2050. So, I can't support wanton killing of unborn babies in the womb for any reason whatsoever. It isn't in me. I don't agree with unborn babies' body parts being sold in the international market illegally either. Abortion devalues life. Abortion is murder. Some people who have experienced an abortion suffer consequences, including low self-esteem, promiscuity, drug and alcohol abuse, rage, and difficulty bonding with mates and other children. Each of these negative reactions that form as a result from abortion contribute to the threats we faces as a community. Also, just because I don't agree with unborn babies getting their body parts destroyed, doesn't mean I'm some Republican. I'm Independent. That is why we should have social services and a safety net. So, I'm not in tuned with the philosophy of von Mises. Yet, especially an able bodied person should have that sense of entrepreneurship, political and social developement, and the responsibility to help our their own community.

It's very common for cowards to criticize Alveda King in a harsh manner. Yet, this is a reality. Alveda is Dr. Martin Luther King's niece of course. I don't agree with her allying with Glen Beck, but she should treated with respect. Unfortunately, we live in a world that doesn't respect people. Alveda is being targeted by numerous people by being outspokenly pro-life. A pro-abortion religious group criticized Alveda King and the U.S. News and World Report columnist Bonnie Erbe is doing the same. Erbe in a Tuesday column, slammed Alveda King for comparing abortion to racism. Erbe made the despicable comment that since she regretted her abortions, she is “co-opted her uncle’s legacy to ‘flog’ issues not central to the civil rights era.” Bonnie is such a liar since there is no evidence that Dr. King was explicitly pro-abortion. In fact, there are many sources proving that many of the King family (including Dr. King) were Pro-Life. Also, human rights in protecting the unborn is a quintessential part of civil rights. Many people during the civil rights era (this era didn't end in the 1960's since the Civil Rights Movement still occurs today) opposed abortion like many Black Panthers and numerous civil rights leaders. Fannie Lou Hammer was a strong sister that was a civil rights activist and she was Pro-Life. Iowa State Rep. June Franklin was a pro-Life female too. There was the time when Rev. Jesse Jackson was Pro-Life and compared it to slavery & genocide. He changed in about 1980. Erbe doesn't even know history. Erbe criticized King's appearance in the August 28 "Restoring Honor" rally in D.C. King said that the womb war threaten the fabric of our society. That is correct since without the womb, there is no rights for any human being. The Nixon White House stopping free speech of journalist/anti abortionist Samuel F. Yette I don't agree with all in the Glen Beck rally though. You can't exist without the womb. Erbe never brought up legitimate criticisms about parts of the rally (which others have done). She just obsess with the abortion and racism link. Alveda King is correct to point out that: "...Abortion and racism stem from the same poisonous root, selfishness.” Nathan Burchfiel of the Culture and Media Institute noticed the column and said Erbe "didn't address King’s characterization of abortion as selfish." Instead, Erbe said, “Racism is unacceptable and violates a basic human right. Abortion is quite something else again.” Abortion is not something else. Abortion is denial of the right to life among innocent unborn human beings (they or the unborn are guilty of no crime whatsoever). Abortion on demand and racism aren't equivalent. Yet, both comes from the same tree of wickedness. King, herself, says in a response: "It is absolutely ludicrous that abortion supporters would accuse a blood relative of Dr. King of hijacking the King legacy." "My dad and my uncle gave their lives to ensure that the day would come when blacks would be judged not by the color of their skin, but the content of their character. If they were here, I know they would stand with me in this fight for the lives of those most vulnerable among us," she added. If Dr. Martin Luther King was alive today, he would never support partial birth abortion or the extreme portions of Roe v. Wade at all. Although, Dr. Martin Luther King supported birth control. I don't believe in comparing black children to endangered species. Dr. King's father and his friend Ralph Abernathy were Pro-Life throughout their lives. Dr. Ralph David Abernathy was on of Dr. Martin Luther King's closest friends. Pro-abortion radicals are trying to hijack Dr. King's legacy instead. The establishment Left (not real liberals since numerous liberals are Pro-Life) hates the fact that more and more black people understand the eugenic heritage of the evil, murderous organization of Planned Parenthood. Its founder was an occultist, worked with globalists, condemned charity, believed in eugenics, went into a Klan rally to speak to racists, and was an adulteress. Tom Metzger, the former Klan leader promotes the pushing of abortion clinics in Black Neighborhoods. From Metzger: “…abortion and birth control should be promoted as a powerful weapon, in the limitation of non-White birth." Why would I support PP when they are funded by the Rockefeller foundation? I won't via critical deductive reasoning.



By Timothy