The Presidential race is between President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Patriots and other folks have documented that for years. He is alleged to have an attendance in the 2012 Bilderberg group meeting. Mitt Romney has spoken outright that he will focus on the war on terror domestically against U.S. citizens via his support of the National Defense Authorization Act (which once had strong words on how Americans can be kidnapped and held indefinitely without a trial). Romney is very similar ideologically to the President. Romney's health care law was the blueprint wherefore the President passed his health care reform law (a law with many great provisions in it, but the law isn't perfect by no stretch of the imagination). The NDAA still has anti-liberty parts in it. Mitt Romney supports carbon taxes and once he advanced some anti-Second Amendment policies as an innocent citizen ought not to have their Second Amendment rights restricted at all. He was once for abortion and now he says that he's against it. If Mitt Romney becomes the new President, he can put many conservatives to sleep while he continues the same old policies of the previous administrations. It's easy to see that both candidates are funded by the same financial interests. These interests include Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse Group, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, UBS, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Barclays. A rumored VP of Mitt Romney is Marco Rubio of Florida. Marco Rubio wants more military attacks from America to Syria and Iran. He is a strong neo-con. Some people are upset that Rand Paul (or the son of Ron Paul) supported Mitt Romney on Sean Hannity's TV show on FOX News. It's a shame that Rand Paul did it, but this isn't surprising. Rand is a Republican and most Republicans will support Romney politically. Many of Ron Paul's supporters decried Rand Paul's recent early June 2012 endorsement of Mitt Romney. What do I think of this? I believe that we shouldn't make a man an idol. I am not an idol. Only God is the person I worship. Therefore, we can't compromise with tyranny. We should continue with supporting health freedom, the sanctity of human life, our civil rights, and the right of a person to possess gun rights. I do believe in economic justice still. The reality is that Ron Paul, Rand Paul, and Mitt Romney each support austerity and the gradual destruction of the modern day safety net (that means massive elimination or massive cuts to Medicaid, Social Security, Medicare, SCHIP, etc. Hating austerity isn't socialism, because socialism means that the government controls all means of production without exceptions. We live in a mixed economy in America). We have the right to advance real economic rights and human rights. We should not glory in Rand Paul being allied with Mitt Romney. We should continue forward in promoting the liberties that our forefathers and our ancestors (of every background and every color) died for.
Chuck Baldwin is a conservative man. He is definitely right that it is morally wrong for the White House to participate in targeted assassinations against American citizens without the due process of the law. There is a recent New York Times report. It reveals about how President Barack Obama is engaging in secret assassinations worldwide. Judge Andrew Napolitano opposes this action. The reason is that it is unethical to engage in secret assassination programs when the West condemns terrorists for doing similar actions against innocent civilians. So, for decades, the President worked with their advisers and spies. The President and his officials review a list of people that they want to kill. They justify this actions as some priority of keeping America safe. This action isn't science fiction. This is real. These things don't just occur from North Korea or the old school Soviet Union. America has embraced these policies long before President Barack Obama was elected President of the United States of America. The 2 journalists who wrote the report are Jo Becker and Scott Shane. The President once was the former lecturerer in constitutional law. He was the liberal Senator that spoke out against torture and Gitmo. Now, he weekly reviews a secret kill list. He decides who died or not all over the world. Some of the people who died are Americans excluding the right of due process. That is wrong period. The drone attacks are done too in Pakistan and Pakistan opposes it, because it represents a violation of their national sovereignty. As Judge Napolitano wrote: "..."Since 9/11, the United States government has set up national security systems that function not under the Constitution, not under the Geneva Conventions, not under the rule of law, not under the rules of war, not under federal law, but under a new secret system crafted by the Bush administration and personally directed by Obama, the same Obama who condemned these rules as senator and then extended them as president. In the name of fighting demons in pick-up trucks and wars that Congress has never declared, the government shreds our rights, taps our cellphones, reads our emails, kills innocents abroad, strip searches 87-year-old grandmothers in wheelchairs and 3-year-old babies in their mothers' arms, and offers secrecy when the law requires accountability..." There is absolutely no substitute for due process at all. It worked during the times of the Magna Carta and it has worked in 2012 for Americans. There is no need to circumvent it in order to promote secret assassinations against potentially American citizens at all. There should be the rule of law not the unitary rule of Presidents. These drone attacks also have killed civilians not accused "terrorists." Unfortunately, this story isn't massively reported in the mainstream media at all. Even FOX News ignores this story. George W. Bush is as responsible for the war on terror evils as the present administration is. The Republicans and Democrats are both complicit in advancing draconian, anti-civil liberty laws. Bush Jr. made the Department of Homeland Security, which is an organization of snoops, spies, and fear mongers. The same Orwellian globalists and internationalists are manipulating President Barack Obama, the ex-President George W. Bush, and Republican candidate Mitt Romney. The names of the secret kill list aren't known by the rest of the public. We don't need history repeating itself, but under both parties, they promote empire building, torture, killings, and the status quo. Although, it's bigger than the current President. The current President (like all of us. I am of black African descent, so I am an African born in the wilderness of North America) is a victim of a white supremacist system that harms the human race.
The events in Syria represent imperialism 101 by the West. One tactic of the imperialist West is to use Syria and the Middle East as a springboard for them to fight Russia and China covertly. For years, the West wanted Russia to bow before them and to control the Central Asia mineral resources (and then later try to rule China if they can). Some extremists even want a war with Iran. Humanitarianism is one way where the imperialists are attempting to justify their criminal activities. Humanitarianism is legitimate and good, yet there is no justification for drone attacks or targeted assassinations of people secretly at all. Even Freedom for Defense of Democracies' Clifford May (a neo-con) admitted that Syria is a proxy war with Iran and Russia (human rights is merely a pretense for imperialism). May wrote about this in his own article entitled, "The Battle of Syria: Assad's survival would be a victory for Iran and a defeat for the U.S." The neo-cons agree with al-Qaeda's war campaign in Syria. Ironically, Saudi Arabia and Israel are allies in trying to end the regimes of Syria and Lebanon. They also want to end the Iran regime too. Seymour Hersh wrote an article about how the West is arming and staging people for ending the Syrian government. These people armed are affiliated with al-Qaeda as well. The Sunnis and Shias are played against each other by htei the imperialists. The neo-con May falsely believed that al-Qaeda was a creation of Iran. The truth is that America's CIA created the nucleus of al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda came from the mujujadeen that fought in the mountains of Afghanistan against the Soviets (during the 1970's and the 1980's). Al-Qaeda has been used to execute Western foreign policy. The internal documents of US policy makers, including Brookings Institution's "Which Path to Persia?" concede that even if Iran were to obtain nuclear weapons, they would not be deployed as anything but a means of deterrence, just as the US and Soviets did during the Cold War. Brookings concedes that it is a feared shift in geopolitical influence at the expense of America and its proxies that drives Western ambitions toward regime change in Iran, not any legitimate threat to the national security of either America or Israel. Even the Libyan government was overthrown via the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (or the LIFG)). TThe LIFG is a wing of al-Qaeda. The West has funded, trained, and armed the Mujahideen-e-Khalg (or MEK) for years against Iran. The MEK is called a foreign terror organization by the U.S. State Department. So, the U.S. is funding militants in Syria. It's hypocritical for the West to claim to love democracy, but they work with the Muslim Brotherhood, terrorist radicals, and other people in trying to get regime changes in the Middle East. We don't need this unjust bloodshed in Syria. We need a cease fire and a negotiated settlement as the late Dr. Martin Luther King said in order to cause solutions.
It's not a secret that the European aristocracy embrace controversial religious and political views. The British Royal Family and other royal families of Europe are related to many elites in America. Some of these individuals falsely believe that they are intellectually and social superior to the rest of us (especially people of color). Their ilk and many European Monarchs have used wars, economic sabotage, and political intrigue to advance their agendas. We have a federal European Union and others elites have called for the establishment of the new world order. They controlled the British Empire and exploited the United States of America. The Royal families, secret societies, and religious elites use business monopolies and family connections to rule over the international banking system. They have infiltrated political organizations of numerous stripes and orientations. One example is how Wall Street funds both the Republicans and the Democrats exorbitantly. Even Carrol Quigley admitted that the Republicans and the Democrats are nearly identical. The elite use the mirage of a democracy in order to give the deception of real choices and true consensus in the globe. One world government as a goal by the elite has been admitted by books, documents, speakers, and other folks for centuries. Today, we have problems such as drug abuse, a war on terror, outsourcing, etc. Queen Elizabeth II is just one person out of the super rich families that control most of the geo-political policies of the Earth. The Queen of England is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. The Anglicans is the official state religion of England. Yet, Christianity has decreased in England. Many elitists are pantheists in their views. Shallow doctrines and pageantry regularly replace biblical Christianity in certain areas of the UK. This is why the ruling elite have been Freemasons, atheists, or Unitarians. The husband of Queen Elizabeth II is the Freemason Prince Philip. The Queen's eldest son is Prince Charles. He is an advocate of the New Age philosophy and Ecumenicalism. Even Queen Victoria during the 19th century attended seances and agreed with mediums channeling messages from demonic sources. Unitarians views, Freemasonry, and New Ageism are similar in believing that all a human can believe in any creed possible and still have spiritual access to one god. The New Testament even made a distinction between believers and unbelievers including the saved and not. Freemasonry and the New Age Movement reject the original sin, the fallen state of man, and the need for redemption through the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Queen Elizabeth II taught the good which is in all of us, yet none of us are good except God. Freemasonry teaches that there is a oneness of truth in Christ, Buddha, Muhammad, and other spiritual leaders. This was written about by high level Mason Manly P. Hall. Man's heart is always wicked. Who can know it except God. Freemason Prince Philip expressed worse comments about humans. He said that humans are a plague, so population control is necessary to radically reduce the world's population. So, it's easy to see that the global elite use the monarchies and Freemasonry to advance New Age teachings in the world. Many Presidents and royals are Freemasons or a member of a secret occult secret society. Paganism is one part of the one world order agenda and the one world religion agenda indeed.
As progressive human beings, we have to constantly promote self improvement. One expert panel found out that there are false accounts of U.S. political figures on 9/11. We know about the war games on September 11. They raise questions on what the government could of done to prevent such a tragic occurrence from happening in the world. New evidence is being shown that some activities from former President George W. Bush, ex-Vice President Dick Cheney, and ex-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld were falsely reported by official sources. The 20 member 9/11 Consensus Panel (made up of mostly pro-9/11 truth individuals) analyzed evidence many places like press reports, FOIA requests, and archived 9/11 Commission file documents. They came to produce 8 new studies. They were released today. The international Panel also discovered that four massive aerial practice exercises traditionally held in October were in full operation on 9/11. The largest, Global Guardian, held annually by NORAD and the US Strategic and Space Commands, had originally been scheduled for October 22-31 but was moved, along with Vigilant Guardian, to early September. Senior officials claimed that no one could have predicted using hijacked planes as weapons. The truth is that the military had been prating similar exercises on 9/11 itself and years before 9/11. The Panel found that there was widespread confusion and delays in the defense response. They looked to see who was overseeing the air defenses after the second Tower was hit at 9:03 am. Official sources claimed neither Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Joint Chiefs of Staff Acting Chairman General Richard Myers (filling in for General Hugh Shelton), nor war-room chief General Montague Winfield were available to take command until well after the Pentagon was struck about 9:37. Yet emerging documents and memoirs show that top leaders were engaged earlier -- and later discussed a shoot down of the “let's roll” Flight 93 before debris was scattered widely around its alleged Shanksville, Pennsylvania crash site. One mystery about this event is who was running the Pentagon's war room during the critical early hours. This information inspired the Kuala Lumpur Tribunal on May 15 to have a verdict of convicting Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld of torture and war crimes. The Consensus Panel has completed 25 educational studies to find out the best evidence regarding the official claims about 9/11. Its goal is to “provide a ready source of evidence-based research to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution.”
No comments:
Post a Comment