Walter Cronkite passed away recently. He was called the most trusted anchor in America. He was on the desk of the major anchor chair of CBS from 1962 to 1981. He spoke about crisis, victories, and tradegies. Cronkite even celebrated the journey of NASA putting man on the moon on July 20, 1969. Today is the 40th year anniversary of that event. There is although a secret history of Walter Cronkite that few people realize. Cronkite was the former intelligence officer who was lured away from his UPI Moscow desk by Operation Mockingbird's Phil Graham. As many realize, the corporate media is filled with spies, government agents, and intelligence opratives. The CIA have had assets in many major news publications to control the spread of information. This has been confirmed by numerous FOIA documents. Even the Frank Church's committee exposed this truth in the mid 1970's. Some of the journalists working the CIA’s side of the street “were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors-without-portfolio for their country,” Carl Bernstein wrote in an article published in Rolling Stone in October, 1977. “Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested it the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles, and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad.” Alex Constantine wrote in his The Depraved Spies and Moguls of the CIA’s Operation MOCKINGBIRD that it wasn't until 1982 that the CIA openly admitted that reporters were on the payroll and acted as case officers or agents in the field. This power can cause the manipulation of public opinion as well. The 1950's was the time when the CIA's covert operation budget for global propaganda climbed a lot. About 3,000 salaried and contract CIA employees were engaged in propaganda efforts. The cost of this evil was estimated to be about $265 million a year by 1978. This is a larger budget than the combined expenditures of Reuters, UPI, and the AP news syndicates. Cronkite used his status to promote globalism. He accepted the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Goverance Award at the ceremony at the United Nations. He even gave a speech where he advocated global government or world government (with a world police, etc. that violates American sovereignity. He had the nerve to compare the colonies with the justification to form the new world order when the colonies were decentralized). Cronkite was a famous person in the Bohemian Grove and he was a DeMolay member as a child. The Demolay is a Masonic children organization that some go on into Freemasonry by the time they reach 21 years old. Walter Cronkite was right on some points, but he was under the agenda of the CIA at the behest of the ruling elite.
Malcolm X is a famous leader in African American history. He was called many names like controversial and other words by his distractors. He was right on many issues and wrong on others. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and is most famous for working in Harlem, New York. He acted as a criminal and was caught after robbing a person's home. While in jail, Malcolm X converted to the Nation of Islam's philosophy. He worked for the Nation of Islam as a follower of Elijah Muhammad. He left the group since the NOI preventing him from publicly speaking after his chickens coming home to roost comment (that relates to JFK). After his trip from Mecca, Saudi Arabia (which was apart of the Islamic requirement of the hajj or pilgrimage. He met people of many races to embrace a more racial tolerant message), he fully left the Nation of Islam. He formed the Organization for Afro-American Unity that tried to nationally plus internationally make solutions for black people globally. Malcom X rejected the American support for the Vietnam war and spread the ideals of black nationalism. Malcolm X was monitored by the FBI and the CIA for years preceding his death. He rejected racism and was assassinated by many men in February of 1965. He wanted to go into the U.N. to make charges bear against the American government for crimes against black America. A whole scandal would differently ensue if Malcolm X carried forth that plan. Karl Evanzz wrote an interesting book entitled, "The Judas Factor: The Plot to Kill Malcolm X." This book exposed how the FBI harrassed Black Muslims and infiltrated the NOI. Evanzz is a journalist who spent 15 years researching the case of the assassination of Malcolm X. He proves the fact that John X. Ali was an FBI informat which caused fiction between Elijah Muhammad and Malcolm X. Elijah Muhammad was a fraud and false prophet anyway. Friedly points out, however, that the New York City Police Department did a poor job of protecting Malcolm X and has yet to release its files of the case. Both authors clearly show that the CIA and FBI were concerned about Malcolm X's growing power, especially after he and Elijah Muhammad had gone their separate ways. The FBI was worried that Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were going to join forces, while the CIA was concerned about Malcolm X's visits to African leaders and what this might mean for American race relations. The book exposes the CIA murders or attempted murders of Third World. Malcolm X still was an Orthodox Muslim. I don't agree with Islam since hajj, the zadat, and other works can never save the human soul. Only God's grace can. Allah is a pre-Islamic deity of the sun god and it isn't the Semitic word for Almighty God at all. The Quran and especially the Hadith contradicts what the OT and NT prescribe about God, theology, salvation, Heaven, etc. Muhammad married a 6 year old girl and made no explicit prophecies of the future, but Muhammad is called the last of the great prophets by Muslim adherents. Learning this history is important, because you can never make improvements in the present plus future without learning the vital lessons of the past.
There is another example of the federal government violating the rights of a state gun law in Tennessee. Last month, the state of Tennesse's General Assembly passed House Bill 1796. This is called the "Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act" which states that any firearms or ammunition manufactured within the state and legally owned (and kept within the state by citizens) are “not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration” due to provisions in the Second, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. This bill is a commonsense measure that isn't controversial at all. Yet, according to Assistant Director Carson W. Carroll of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (or the BATFE), the U.S. Constitution can be manipulated against a state's legal procedings. On July 16, Carroll dispatached his agency's official response to the law passed in Tennessee. The BATFE asserts that the federal law supersedes the Act and all provisions of the Gun Control Act (plus the National Firearms Act) including their corresponding regulations continue to apply. Tennessee will probably react to this proclamation by the BATFE. The fact is that the BATFE has no authority to interpret the Constitutional legality of a state law, since they are not a legislative body. They are a federal executive group of people. To violate a state's right to create a commonsense gun law is a violation of seperation of powers in American government. The Second Amendment is here for a reason. It wasn't even created to allow the BATFE or the federal government to act as it wish on the terms of gun rights. It was formulated to allow the basic right of human beings to own guns in order to protect themselves. One of the actions of tyrannical government is the suppression of firearms among innocent citizens. We should hope that history will never repeat itself in American society, but there are those who blatantly seek to ban all weapons among all humans. That's wrong and contradicts the essence of the definition of individual liberty in American society.
Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com Editor on July 17, 2009 wrote about how conservative Democrats could help to stop the health care bill with a pro-abortion component in it. The pro-life movement is fighting continously against the inclusion and promotion of abortion in various health care bill that Congress is considering. Conservative Democrats are speaking up against the measures and could provide help in defeating them. President Barack Obama has called for Congress to give him a health care reform bill by the end of August. Some Democrats are rebelling agianst his policy through the House and Senate. Arkansas Rep. Mike Ross is a spokesman for the 52 member Democrats in the Blue Dog Coalition. He said that Democratic leaders don't have the votes they need to pass the bill. “There’s no way [party leaders] can pass the current bill on the House floor” without major changes to it, Ross said. Ross says seven members of his group who sit on the Energy and Commerce Committee will vote against the bill unless major changes are made. Ross said that we can have all the time we need to make changes since the Congress don't have the votes to get it out of committee. "Last time I checked, it takes seven Democrats to stop a bill in the Energy and Commerce Committee," Ross told reporters. "We had seven against it last Friday; we have 10 today." Pro-Life Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak proclaimed that this is a signal they are not going to roll over just because the title of the bill relates to health care (when he discussed about his party leaders facing opposition within the caucus). The House committees are slated to begin considering the $1 trillion-plus bill this week. The Energy and Commerce though looms as the biggest challenge. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reacted to Ross' comments as believing that these issues will be worked out through the legislative process. The Obama administration is sensing these issues. That is why pro-abortion Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is meeting with some moderate Democrats to keep the health care restructing bills moving forward. Help from conservative Democrats against the bill is necessary because pro-life advocates are working overtime to amend or defeat it because of concerns that it will lead to significant abortion funding and coverage mandates. Republican Rep. Joe Pitts, of Pennsylvania, talked about those problems after Thursday's committee meeting on H.R. 3200, the House Democrats’ healthcare reform bill. "Under the proposed legislation, virtually every individual will be required to have health care coverage that meets 'minimum benefits standards' established by the administration," he explained. Pitts believe that those minimum benefits will include abortion unless Congress explicitly exclude abortion from any government mandated coverage or taxpayer funded health plan. He believes if the abortion ban isn't including in the bill, administrative agencies and the courts will mandate it. The case that abortion is murder is clear cut and taxpayers shouldn't fund abortions at all.
Some believe that political leaders resisting the FED have faced negative consequences from the federal government. There is the scandal of South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford. Sanford did the wrong thing of cheating with his wife with the Argentine commodities broker named Maria Belen Chapur. That is why he resigned as Chairman of the Republican Governors Association. He is a disagrace, yet he still wants to fight to his job. He used public funds to entertain his mistress. That could be an impeachable offense. Now, in early 2009, he refused to accept stimulus funds until the South Carolina Supreme Court forced him to accept the money (from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009). He believed that the states shouldn't be under too much federal control. Sanford's problems came after he fought against the Federal banks plus the U.S. Treasury Department. Others have expereinced scandals as a result of rebelling against the FED or Wall Street. Former Governor Eliot Spitzer of New York served a New York Attorney General at one time. He then took on organized crime and securities fraud (he created chargea in lawsuits against Richard Grasso. Grasso was the former Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange). He fought against stock price inflation by investment houses, predatory practices by mortgage lenders, and mutual fund fraud. He continued to pursue his campaign against corrupt banking practices as governor. By March 2008, the New York Times reported that Spitzer was a client of a prostitution ring then under investigation by the federal government (He resigned 2 days later. The NY Times refuse to describe about how leaked the information). Some believe that Spitzer's scandal was retaliation for his campaign against Wall Street corruption. Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich was accused by the FEDs in December 2008 of many charges like wire fraud and solicitation of bribery. This comes after Rod refuse to do business with Bank of America, because they cut a line of credit to a Chicago factory (This recieved some news coverage. The Bank of America is a member bank of the Federal Reserve. Rod is also accused of solicit bribes and accepting kickbacks). The feds got him in handcuffs by December 8, 2008. Interestingly, on the same morning but before the arrest had hit the news wires, Bloomberg.com quoted John Douglas, attorney for Bank of America and former general counsel for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., as describing Blagojevich’s declaration against Bank of America as “dangerous.” It could be dangerous for the banking industry, but not necessarily for the American people. Jesse Ventura even claimed that CIA agents want to test him about his independent streak when he was governor in Minnesota (from 1999 to 2003. He is mostly a Libertarian man). Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois was accused of $43,000 worth of Berkshire Hathaway stock the same day he had liquidated his mutual funds and eventually invested a total of about $98,000 with the Oracle of Omaha’s fund. This was after he criticized the banking lobby as owning Congress. This non-scandal died down since many others were doing the same thing by protecting their own savings. The government's monitoring of people illegally is occuring by the NSA, AT& T, and other telecommunication companies. So, we should expose this evil of government corruption without fear whatsoever of this world.
The Vatican/Jesuits have been exposed grealty in recent year. People point to ex-Jesuit General Wlodimir Ledochowski (of Polish descent) of being a great contributor to the existence of WWI and WWII. Germany was used by the Austrian Hitler and other Papal agents to destroy Europe and lower the influence of heavily Protestant Germany, the Baltic states, etc. This was done to set the stage for the formation of a mostly Catholic European Union among other reasons. Those who died in the Holocaust were Orthodox people, Protestants, liberal Catholics, Jewish people, and others of numerous backgrounds. The Holocaust was a response to Germany's 1870 anti-Catholic policy of Kulturkampf since many Jesuits in Germany desired a more authoritarian/theocratic government in Germany. Hitler, Stalin, and other dictators were significant players in WWII who were under the power of the elite. Ledochowsi supported the racial persecution of Jewish people as he hated liberals and modernists especially in Poland. The Ustashi massacre of Serbs, Jewish people, Gypsies, and other were so horrific that it was similar to things going on in a horror movie. Loedochwski hated Germany and Italy in order to wish that the temporal power of the Vatican to be restored to the old Roman states, which occured under Mussolini. Tupper Saussy called the Jesuits the Vatican's spies in manipulating the actions of nations. Even Franklin D. Roosevelt was an ally of Jesuit Edmund Walsh. Walsh worked at Nuremberg and other parts of WWII. Ledochowski died in 1942 of intestinal problems. According to Richard Whitehall's page 95 cite of the book "Rex Germanorum, Populos Sclavorum: An Inquiry into the Origin & Early History of the Serbs/Slavs of Sarmatia, Germania, & Illyria" by Ivo Vukcevich wrote that this Superior General appeared to have supported the Catholic crusade against schismatics in Eastern plus SE Europe. The Papal connections to WWII is more deep than what the public is shown indeed.
The government wants to acquire legal immunity for swine flu vaccine makers. This story was reported by the AP, which was published in July 18, 2009. The last time the government embarked on a major vaccine campaign against a new swine flu, thousands of people filed claims contending that they have suffered side effects from the shots. This time around, the government is trying to head that possible of massive lawsuits off. That is why vaccine makers and federal officials will be immune from lawsuits that result from any new swine flu vaccine. This is according to a document by Secretary of Health Services Kathleen Sebelius that government health officials have said on Friday. Since the 1980's, the government have protected vaccine makers against lawsuits over the use of childhood vaccines. There is a federal court that handle claims and decides who will be paid from a special fund. The document was signed by Sebelius last month that grants immunity to those making a swine flue vaccine (under the provisions of a 2006 law for public health emergencies). It makes a compensation fund if necessary. The government is successful in encouraging drug companies to create vaccines. They have contracted with 5 manufactures to make a swine flu vaccine. The swine flu virus was first identified in April of 2009. It has caused so far 263 deaths. These numbers were released by the CDC or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on last Friday. The CDC believes that more than 40,000 Americans have had confirmed on probable cases, but those are people who sought health care. It's likely that more than 1 million Americans have been sickened by the flu with many with mild cases. The virus hits younger people harder than the seasonal flu. yet, it hasn't been more deadly than the strains seen every fall and winter. Health officials believe that the virus though can mutate into a more dangeorus form or at least contribute to a potential heavier flu season than usual. "We do expect there to be an increase in influenza this fall," with a bump in cases perhaps beginning earlier than normal, said Dr. Anne Schuchat, director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved the regular winter flu vaccine. This is the final step before shipments to clinics and other vaccination sites could commence. The government faced a similar swine flu virus in 1976. There were cases back then that existed among soldiers at Fort Dix, N.J. One person died. This made health officials worried that they could be facing a deadly pandemic on the scale of the influenza pandemic that killed millions in 1918 and 1919 (throughout the Earth). Therefore, Federal officials vaccinated 40 million Americans via a naitonal campaign. No pandemic came about. Yet, thousands of people who got the shots filed injury claims. The reason is that the victims of the shots believed that they have suffered a paralyzing condition called Guillain-Barre Syndrome or other side effects. "The government paid out quite a bit of money," said Stephen Sugarman, a law professor who specializes in product liability at the University of California at Berkeley. Vaccines aren't as profitable as other drugs for manufacturers, and without protection against lawsuits "they're saying, 'Do we need this?'" Sugarman said. Paul Pennock is a prominent New York plaintiffs attorney on medical liability cases. He rejects the move to protect makers of a swine flu. He believes that the government will likely call on millions of Americans to get the vaccinations to prevent the disease form spreading. "If you're going to ask people to do this for the common good, then let's make sure for the common good that these people will be taken care of if something goes wrong," Pennock said. People have a right to sue the government if the government forcibly makes a policy to force people to have a specific dangerous form of vaccinations. Forced vaccinations are evil like always.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment