Wednesday, April 30, 2008

NewsLetter from Cutting Edge Ministries

VeriChip Markets Its Implantable RFID Tags and Services Direct to Consumers

Tax-Free 'Inland Port' Opens Up Foreign Trade in Dallas

Other news and Katie Couric (Bill O'Reilly)




Katie Couric and the Corporate Media Gear Up for Iran Attack

Kurt Nimmo
April 30, 2008


David Martin, “CBS News national security correspondent,” that is to say he reads from a neocon script, reports:

A second American aircraft carrier steamed into the Persian Gulf on Tuesday as the Pentagon ordered military commanders to develop new options for attacking Iran. CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports that the planning is being driven by what one officer called the “increasingly hostile role” Iran is playing in Iraq — smuggling weapons into Iraq for use against American troops.

Of course, the Pentagon, under the sway of the neocons, has planned to attack Iran for some time. In their charming way, the neocons are simply telling you — via the corporate media with high school sweetheart anchor Katie Couric (see video) reporting — that mass murder shall commence sooner before later. Once again, we have Sec. Def. Gates declaring Iran is killing U.S. soldiers, minus any evidence whatsoever.

Even the CIA’s favorite newspaper, the Washington Post, was obliged to report when Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, declared “he has no evidence the Iranian government has been sending military equipment and personnel into neighboring Iraq.”

In October, 2006, Britain, “whose forces have had responsibility for security in southeastern Iraq since the war began, has found nothing to support the Americans’ contention that Iran is providing weapons and training in Iraq,” according to military officials.

U.S. officials are also concerned by Iranian harassment of U.S. ships in the Persian Gulf as well as Iran’s still growing nuclear program. New pictures of Iran’s uranium enrichment plant show the country’s defense minister in the background, as if deliberately mocking a recent finding by U.S. intelligence that Iran had ceased work on a nuclear weapon.

Iranian harassment? It was just five days ago a “civilian ship contracted by the U.S. military fired warning shots at two small boats approaching it in the Persian Gulf,” according to MSNBC. In order to provide legitimacy for this unprovoked attack, the Associated Press dredged up the specter of the the USS Cole, the U.S. Navy guided missile destroyer supposedly attacked by suicide bombers dispatched by Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda.

Not exactly, as the bombing was carried out by the Islamic Army of Aden, funded by Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, who was connected to the 1995 Bojinka plot. Khalifa was a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood, long ago penetrated by U.S. and British intelligence, and ran the Muslim World League in Peshawar, Pakistan, that is to say he worked for the CIA and the ISI during the CIA’s effort to kick the Soviets out of Afghanistan. As well, Ramzi Yousef, a known CIA operative, was involved in Bojinka. But I digress.

How soon we forget. In January, the Pentagon claimed Iran attempted to provoke a “battle at sea” in the Strait of Hormuz. However, evidence soon emerged suggesting “that the incident did not involve … a threat and that no U.S. commander was on the verge of firing at the Iranian boats,” Gareth Porter wrote for IPS News on January 11. “The new information that appears to contradict the original version of the incident includes the revelation that U.S. officials spliced the audio recording of an alleged Iranian threat onto to a videotape of the incident. That suggests that the threatening message may not have come in immediately after the initial warning to Iranian boats from a U.S. warship, as appears to do on the video.” More sloppy work over at the Pentagon. But then the neocons, understanding well the megaphone effect of the corporate media and the naivety of the American public, didn’t really need to do a smash up job on their attempt to engineer another Gulf of Tonkin event.

As for Iran working on a nuclear weapon, this has all the validity of the neocon claim that Iraq had purchased aluminum tubes in 2000 to complete work on a nuke. In other words, there is no evidence of this, a fact sheepishly admitted by Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns and anonymous U.S. officials, as McClatchy Newspapers reported in November, 2007. In fact, even the CIA ponied up, admitting it had “not found conclusive evidence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons,” reports the BBC. Likewise Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, who said last October that “he had no evidence Iran was working actively to build nuclear weapons and expressed concern that escalating rhetoric from the U.S. could bring disaster,” according to the Associated Press.

But never mind. You will hear none of this from the corporate media and Katie Couric as she reports the Pentagon as had it up to here.

No attacks are imminent and the last thing the Pentagon wants is another war, but Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen has warned Iran not to assume the U.S. military can’t strike.

“I have reserve capability, in particular our Navy and our Air Force so it would be a mistake to think that we are out of combat capability,” Mullen said.

No doubt the Iranians are well aware the Pentagon has the ability to “strike,” that is kill untold numbers of Iranians, and no doubt as well the Iranians are preparing for just such an inevitability, even as they dismiss such a “strike” in public pronouncements. Moreover, it does not matter what the Pentagon thinks, as it is firmly in the control of the neocons, determined to attack before the decider-commander leaves office in January, 2009.

Targets would include everything from the plants where weapons are made to the headquarters of the organization known as the Quds Force which directs operations in Iraq. Later this week Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is expected to confront the Iranians with evidence of their meddling and demand a halt.

Targets would also include Iranian civilian infrastructure. If you’d like a glimpse at what the neocons will do in Iran, look no further than Iraq. Of course, there wasn’t a heck of a lot to bomb in Iraq last time around, as the U.S. had taken out Iraq’s civilian infrastructure in the 1991 “Gulf War,” or maybe it should be called a turkey shoot. Former UN humanitarian coordinator for Iraq, Denis Halliday, “estimated that by 1999 the destruction of Iraq’s infrastructure and UN sanctions had directly caused the deaths of 600,000 children and 500,000 adults through malnutrition and disease. Tens of thousands more people, military and civilian, were killed in the US-led military assault,” writes Terry Cook. Iran understands painfully well it can expect likewise.

As for Nouri al-Maliki, he is simply a puppet and will say whatever the neocons want, lest the Pentagon refuse to protect him and he ends up suffering the fate of what another puppet (and former Unocal employee), Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan, almost suffered a few days ago.

If that doesn’t produce results, the State Department has begun drafting an ultimatum that would tell the Iranians to knock it off — or else.

Or else mass murder.

Unfortunately, the neocons are on a roll now, geared up with a slick corporate media campaign, including the services of America’s sweetheart, Ms. Couric. Some predict an attack against the people of Iran will occur this summer, others say this fall or around the election in November, but forget the precise date predictions, the neocons have told us over and over — and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen is simply underscoring — Iran will be attacked and reduced to Stone Age condition before Bush leaves office. Hillary and Barack are unconcerned — in fact Hillary reasserted her belligerence toward Iran the other day, so we can trust she is on topic when it comes to serial murder of Iranian toddlers and grandmothers.

It will happen before Bush leaves office.

Tragedy shows hypocrisy in abortion issue

The Inspiration and the Requirement to go Forward

3 Tornadoes came into Suffolk, Virginia days ago. Hundreds of homes were damaged and over a hundred people were injured. It was a destructive event. Now, many organizations and charities are assisting plus comforting the victims of the tornadoes. The tornado occured in Suffolk, which is in the region where I live in Hampton Roads. Hampton Roads is a region made up of Southeastern Virginia and Northeastern North Carolina. Suffolk is nearly 30 miles from where I live in Norfolk, VA. I just look at the news coverage of it in local news and in the national news channels. Suffolk is also part of the 7 City family. The 7 cities are Norfolk, Hampton, Virginia Beach, Suffolk, Newport News, Chesapeake, and Portsmouth. The good news is that Virginia is known for transportation, so the development can be quick. A We are Change member from Los Angeles met up with Bob Frum. When the We Are Change reporter asked Frum about 9/11 including his promotion of the evil neo-conservative philosophy, he was angry. Then, Frum used profanity. He assaulted the We Are Change man's camerman. Frum was the one who coined "the axis of evil" phrase in order to advance the Bush administration's policies. Frum accused the person of being at an inappropriate location, but no one was in his booth. The reporter has a First Amendment right to peacefully ask him questions. The increase of confrontations like this tells me something. It tells me about the increase of especially Americans about the nature of the world. The truth is that neo-conservative policy of agitating for wars, the foreign policy of interventionalism, and maintaining hundreds of bases arounds the world like the old Roman Empire isn't working. In fact, it's depleting our economic money which can be better utilized here domestically building up our U.S. infrastructure. Richard C. Cook gave another interesting look on the economy and solutions to our economic problems. Cook gave common solutions like our making our own independent foods, encouraging businesses to buy local, focus on infrastructure building to help our economy (like trains, communication, etc.), and allow Congress to control our monetary system (as mentioned in the Consitution not a group of select beaucrats from the Federal Reserve). European bankers are more powerful than than the FED. Even the Pope and Queen Elizabeth own millions of square miles of lands worldwide. Ultimately, the people and individuals should own their own money. We ought to get out of debt as well. The FED whose over cutting of interest rates and sucking up to international bankers have something to do with trigger the economic disaster in the first place. Neo cons are being taken less and less seriously as time goes on. All of their credibility for their foreign policies has been relinquished. Many of the neo-cons are CFR members and Jesuit Edmund Walsh subscribed to a form of preemptive warfare. The Jeremiah Wright story is a distraction in my mind. The media is obsessing with the story when we should be aware about the new world order, how our civil liberties have been rapidly disappearing, and the police with militarized weapons. Even though Wright is wrong on some issues, he isn't wrong on every point. The mainstream media act like Jeremiah Wright is totally wrong. Media operatives like Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity (who is Jesuit trained. Both are controlled by the biggest media mogul in the world named Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch) are obfuscating the truth. They use ad hominem attacks to demonize anyone saying that the U.S. government and al-Qaeda are equal partners when that's true. It's been documented that U.S. intelligence aided Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda even in the late 1990's when the West/al Qaeda network brutalized the region of Serbia. Not everyone in the government are supremely evil, but certain members are. Additionally, Wright is right that governments like America have performed evil biological experiments. One example is the Tuskegee Experiment where innocent blacks were tested with syphilis via the U.S. Public Heath Service (from 1932 to 1972). The innocent black victims were lied to claiming that they were only given treatment from a disease. Wright also told the truth that the government could create AIDS. See, in July 28, 1969, the Department of Defense (DOD) asked for $10 million from Congress to fund the development of a “synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired . . ." That is why other authors like Graves and Horowitz believes that AIDS is man-made. What we do know is that a body of evidence made by many mainstream scientists dispute the opinion that HIV alone causes AIDS. Biological warfare and weapons have been talked about by the Elite for a very long time from the NSSM 200 Document to the PNAC document calling to genotype specific biological weapons. Mike Adams from Natural News on April 30, 2008 cited more evidence to back up Wright's view on evil medical experiments committed against black Americans. One easy example is how the EPA was caught testing toxic chemicals on low income children just a few years ago in New York. In 1963, Chester M. Southam, who injected Ohio State Prison inmates with live cancer cells in 1952, performed the same procedure on 22 senile, African-American female patients at the Brooklyn Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in order to watch their immunological response. This doesn't mean blacks have a monopoly on suffering evils. Whites, Asians, Hispanics, Jewish people, Arabic people, and all people have suffered oppression and evil throughout human history. I don't see Obama talking about this. It doesn't take a genius to decipher that these eugenicists, corporate elites, and evil folks in government don't care for our national identity or our health. Jeremiah Wright is accurate that the American government gave chemical weapons into Iraq to fight the Iranians in the 1980's. For example, Howard Teicher (a former Reagan official and National Security Council staffer) admitted to he and Donald Rumsfeld went into Iraq to make sure Iraq had weapons to win the Iran-Iraq war. Even GE funded Iran nuclear reactors. Kurt Nimmo wrote The US Department of Commerce licensed 70 biological exports to Iraq between 1985 and 1989, including at least 21 batches of lethal strains of anthrax. Iraq has a very long history and it was the home of many advanced civilizations. Arabic nationalism was strified with British colonalism in the region. Even after WWII, the West interfered with Iraq with the CIA coup of Qasim in the 1960's. Iraq expelled the Jesuits in 1969. Ironically, in 2003, Bush allowed an invasion of the country with Jesuit trained Generals like Patraeus and Casey. The media is focusing their attention on Wright also to make much of the public ignorant of government created evil biological programs spanning many decades. Barack Obama is forced to talked about this issue by distancing himself from the man. He said that Wright wasn't his spiritual advisor, but his pastor to his church. McCain, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton are puppets funding by the political elite and special interests. You've got John McCain meeting with the Rothschilds (Lord Rothschild and Nathaniel Rothschild were hosting a fundraising for him. The Rothschilds are a famous banking family with ties to the Knights of Malta, the Vatican, and the British Elite). Judicial Watch is accused of McCain of doing this since these Rothschilds are foreign nationals. Then, Hillary today will meet up with Bill O'Reilly, when Rupert Murdoch funds Hillary. Globalism is still here and a notorious threat to the world. Mark Memmott and Jill Lawrence from USA Today at April 29, 2008 describe how John McCain is still promoting the "League of Democracies." This organization McCain wished is to revive democratic solidarity and trying to bypass gridlock in the United Nations. His excerpts from his speech outline the League of Democracies as a group trying to form an international order of peace based on freedom. McCain wants a summit of world democracies. The concept of world democracy was promoted by 33rd Degree Freemason Manly P. Hall in his literature. John McCain hopes to use this group to take on AIDS problems in sub-Saharan Africa, Zimbabwe political instability, etc. He wants to this to occur without Russia's or China's approval. What's the truth? The League of Democracies is nothing more than an added layer of a foreign entanglement. There is nothing wrong with trying to stop AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa or helping people. Yet, we don't need of league of democracies in other to do it. We have Constitutional and legal channels already in existence in order to work with other nations. Also, we're a Republic not a Democracy. A democracy is mob rule. In other words, if 51% of the people decides your fate, then it's there without nothing you can do about it. An actual true democracy inhibits the rights of the minority in a society. There is a Democrat commercial criticizing McCain over the Iraq War and other issues. Even though the Republicans almost unamiously voted for the Iraq War, so have the majority of Democrats. The Democrats can complain all they wish about the Republicans not ceasing the war. Yet, when Bush asks for another $100 billion to continue the war, the Democrats give Bush the money. One of the ways to end the war is the cut the funding not continuing it.

John Walsh from the AMW Safety Center at April 28, 2008 writes in favor of DNA sampling from all felony suspects not just convicted criminals. I agree with Walsh that criminals should be brought into justice and that child predators are evil human beings. Although, in the past couple of years (especially after 9/11) he have been increasingly advocating anti-civil liberty policies in the world. Now, he's teaming up with the son of the a Nazi, adulterer, pro-abortion California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Arnold's ally was former Papal Nazi Kurt Waldheim (who was the Secretary General of the U.N.). Him and Schwarzenegger subscribe to more DNA sampling. He passed Proposition 69 which gets DNA from suspects with felonies, not just convicted people. That is immoral since it treats suspects as guilty before proven innocent. Not to mention, it's a violation of people's privacy. The justification for that view is that even if that person is proven innocent the government still controls that DNA. Who's to figure out if the government will carefully perserve your privacy and DNA records afterwards. Mike Whitney from the Online Journal on Tuesday, at April 29, 2008 blamed the Federal Reserve for many of the global famine and economic problems in the world. Riots are globally in Haiti and Egypt. There is double digit inflation in the developing world like in Indonesia, Vietnam, and India. Why is this occuring? The reason isn't necessarily a shortage of food. One reason is the weakening value of the U.S. dollar resulting in speculation and making commodities like foods' prices go higher. Since many nations are so dependant on the dollar, the value of high prices in foods spread across the globe. Presently, Central banks and the political/religious elite control most of the wealth in the world from the Vatican to the Pilgrim Society. Other factors like biofeul ethanol production, the centralization of wealth, etc. contribute to the problem as well. "Rice, death and the dollar", is an article written By Otto Spengler, from the Asia Times. Otto Spengler wrote that global rice population is hitting a record high of 423 million ons in the 2007-2008 crop year. Yet, rices are going up, becaue only 7% of the rice supply is exported because local demand is met by local production. Hence, the local demand cuts the rice supply for export therefore the price increases in foreign countries. The high inflation of the dollar is sent overseas. The reality is that cutting rates have been done. It hasn't work. The solution would be to rethink our whole economic system. It's time to reject this collectivism where power is controlled by the hands of the few. Another Global warming skeptic has been unfairly targeted. ERIC BERGER from the Houston Chronicle at Tuesday, on April 29, 2008 reported on William Gray. Gray was threatened to have lose his support in his seasonal forecasting. Gray says that global warming scientists are brainwashing our children because no evidence exists of a hurricane/global warming coorelation. His own Colorado State University terminated his promotional support. Gray believes that the freedom to express his dissent with anthropogenic global warming is being blatantly strifled. Global warming is readily promoted as an excuse for neo-eugenicists and population control advocates like Ted Turner in the advocacy of controlling our lives and decreasing the human population. They have an anti-human view of things without realizing that mankind historically created legitimate technologies that have cleaned plus improved the environment. More informaiton is coming out about the Arizona State Senator Karen Johnson questioning 9/11's official story publicly. She said that she was a truthseeker and asked questions about the event. Karen said that many in the Arizona legislature have her opinion about 9/11 but are afraid or speaking up. Karen committed that a Commission would never have existed without the Jersey Girls who are activist group of widowed mothers and wives from New Jersey and New York who have continued to question the events of 9/11. Henry Kissinger (a noted advisor to Pope Benedict XVI) left being the head of the CFR-infiltrated 9/11 Commission because of conflicts of interests.

The Jersey girls asked him about his ties to the Bin Laden family and Kissinger stepped down. She helped passed a 9/11 monument with private money without any state involvment. The phrases exposed the government having prior knowledge of that attacks and the backing off of the intelligence agencies in the months prior to 9/11. That's easy to prove of course and even mainstream news articles outline these facts. Karen Johnson is right to promote individual rights and a balanced budget. I strongly disagree with Karen's membership on the board of the Church of Scientology’s Citizens Commission on Human Rights. Scientology was invented by L. Ron Hubbard, who was an extremist. Hubbard's literature bashed the disabled and he supported Aliester Crowley (a Satanist, a degenerate, a Freemason, and an evil man who colloborated with British Intelligence). Scientology teaches falsehoods like how an alien being created the Earth and the physical world. Scientology's dogma is similar to Gnosticism. Pastor Joe Schimmel found a secret OT8 document where Hubbard bashed Christianity and wants to derail the coming of Jesus Christ. Tom Cruise, Catherine Bell, and even Isaac Hayes are members of Scientology. Scientology are known to be complicit in harrashment plus some believed that they have a role in the murder of Lisa McPherson. Therefore, Scientology is a cultic group and Karen Johnson should never have any colloboration with them at all. It isn't unusual to see abortion as a serious problem in the United Kingdom
. Steven Ertelt from Editor at April 29, 2008 focused on a leading pro-life are upset over a British government report. This report says that abortions are done on teenagers and girls as young as 12 years old. This report came after Britian marked the 40th year anniversary of Britian legalizing abortions since 1967. The health department data also shows 138 girls aged 13 had abortions in 2003, which increased to 142 in 2004. It even mentions that girls as long as 10-15 12 year old girls have abortion each year. Joanne Hill, who is a spokeswoman for the British pro-life charity LIFE says that more teenage abortions are there because of some aspects of sexual education that sex is okay as long as contraception is involved. Steven writes that over 200,000 abortion occur annually in Britian with the number growing. It's time to express on what we believe in. There is nothing wrong with being pro-gun, pro-family (This isn't a left/right issue since the vast majority of conservatives, libertarians, liberals, and independent want the improvement of families), pro-life, and respecting our national sovereignity plus our national identity. There is nothing extremist about being opposed to the Iraq War or the war on terrorism in general. Afghanistan and Iraq had no direct involvement in 9/11. I don't believe in going into foreign countries killing people who have nothing to do with harming me, my family, or my country at all. I believe in our rights like having opposition to the Real ID Act, the USA Military Commissions Act, and the USA Patriot Act (created in Jesuit Georgetown University with personages like Viet Dinh). The truth is that we should have inspiration to do what is right. We should remember our past, but focus our energy in the present and future. We shouldn't have fear of anything but God. We should speak about paranoia or fear mongering, but solutions and being meek. Also, you should take nothing from me at face value, but research my words to see if I'm telling you the truth. The reason is that from time to time, I make errors. Also, you ought to be an independent human being and use your God given thinking to find the truth for yourself and help other people. That's why we were created on the Earth in order to worship God, follow his commandments, and help other human beings.

By Timothy

FDA Finds Contaminated Children’s Vaccines at Merck

High-Level Officials Warn of Fake Terror

Biofuels crime against humanity - UN


Appeals Court Upholds Finding: Port Authority 68% Liable for the 1993 WTC Bombing and Terrorists Only 32% Responsible

Eugenics and Environmentalism: From quality control to quantity control


Eugenics and Environmentalism: From quality control to quantity control

Daniel Taylor
Old Thinker News
Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Has eugenics faded away with time, or has the pseudo science morphed and cloaked itself under new auspices? Were some of the original founders of population control efforts themselves eugenicists? How and when did eugenicists shift from Galton era ideals to Malthusian population control? The history of eugenics is incredibly detailed and expansive, but there are certain issues that are not given as much attention as others. This article attempts to answer these questions and provide a wider perspective on these important issues.

From quality control to quantity control

While there are examples of eugenics still in practice in its pre WWII form, eugenicists were forced to scale back rhetoric and reframe their ideas in the post WWII world. Hitler's actions embarrassed eugenicists in America enough for them to at least publicly change their ideas.

China currently has Galton-era eugenics laws on the books which only allow pre-approved couples to marry and have children. The Law of the People's Republic of China on Maternal and Infant Health Care states that if the approved couples children are deemed to be inferior they are to be terminated. [1]

(Article continues below)

The United States was the first to enact eugenic sterilization laws in the state of Indiana in 1907. By the mid 1930's, 34 states had passed mandatory sterilization laws. Many of the laws remained active as late as 1974. Eugenics officially ended, yet remained.

Dr. David C. Reardon has documented the shift to population control among eugenicists in chapter five of his work in progress, The Eugenics Connection: Shapers of Humanity. He writes regarding the earlier eugenic practices in the United States,

"During the early 1930's, eugenics reached the height of its popularity in pre-World war II America. It was during this period, when their political power was greatest, that eugenicists and Neo-Malthusians became increasingly radical in their demands to eliminate the 'unfit,' whom they called a "race of chronic paupers, a race parasitic upon the community." The eugenic weapons to be used in this 'war between races' were increasingly coercive and destructive. In 1932, at the Third International congress of Eugenics held in New York City, proposals were made to prevent the 'further dilution of the American gene pool' by those who possessed 'inferior genes' through segregation, sterilization, birth control, abortion and even infanticide." [2]

Reardon then documents the discrediting of eugenics and the toning down of rhetoric coming from its supporters. One of the factors cited by Reardon which dampened enthusiasm was the targeting of upper classes for sterilization due to their financial dethroning as a result of the great depression. Reardon writes,

"Suddenly, many of those in the upper and middle-classes, who had previously judged hereditary 'unfitness' on the basis of economic poverty, now found themselves impoverished. These 'new poor' feared that the selection of the 'unfit' might be confused. Finding themselves labeled 'the aristocracy of the unfit' by eugenicists, they feared that they might be the ones to suffer from compulsory sterilization, not just the "truly unfit." [3]

James Lovelock, a prominent environmental activist, recently made headlines with his comments on what he calls imminent environmental calamity. Interestingly, Lovelock stated that the world faces an environmental crisis largely brought on by over-population in which he would like to see "the best of our species" survive. [4]

This brings us to the post WWII era of eugenics. Eugenicists who still held on to the discredited principles of eugenics now attached these ideas to environmentalism and population control in an attempt to carry on eugenics in a more veiled form. Malthusian population control was now emphasized.

The Rockefellers and the Osborns

An important point to be made when covering these issues is that the very same families who had previously funded and popularized eugenics in America prior to World War II shifted their resources into funding and promoting population reduction and control in the post WWII era.

Several prominent families are responsible for funding and promoting eugenics in America, namely the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman, and Osborn families. Two families, the Rockefellers and the Osborns, are particularly significant. John D. Rockefeller Sr. contributed a large amount of money to build the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in the early 1900's, which housed the Eugenics Records Office from 1910-1944. Rockefeller influence also spread overseas to Germany, where the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry, and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity resided. Much of the money used to run these facilities came from Rockefeller. [5] These institutes became centers for Nazi eugenics programs during the reign of Adolf Hitler.

The influence of the Rockefeller family continued in 1945 when John D. Rockefeller Jr. donated the land upon which the United Nations stands in New York City. The U.N. plays an important roll in population control, a subject which will be covered shortly. Watch the video below to see former New York Mayor Rudolf Giuliani introduce a short documentary regarding Rockefeller's influence in the founding of the U.N.

In 1952, John D. Rockefeller the 3rd, the oldest son of Rockefeller Jr., founded the Population Council. The organizations stated goal is to seek "...better understanding of problems relating to population." [6] The first president of the Council was Frederick Henry Osborn, who was appointed by John D. Rockefeller himself. Osborn was a prominent eugenicist who helped found the American Eugenics Society, now called The Society for the Study of Social Biology. Osborn headed the AES from 1946-1952, when he began to place greater emphasis on population control, signaling the shift of post WWII eugenicists. [7] Osborn wrote in his 1968 book The Future of Human Heredity that "Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under another name than eugenics."

Frederick Henry Osborn's nephew, Henry Fairfield Osborn, carried on the banner of population control. His 1948 book Our Plundered Planet covers many of the issues that environmentalists are concerned with today. Osborn states in the book that over-population will destroy the planet and that drastic measures must be taken to curtail population growth. He takes a moment to reflect on the savage nature of his outlined proposal, but states that it will have to be done. He writes,

"Of course, as we all know, these are momentous days and many things can happen to check population growth, even including the devastating use of atomic bombs in a new war. It is difficult to adjust one's mind to the possibility that the present negotiations between nations could fail to prevent such a savage denial of the right to human existence, and that the problem of the pressure of increasing populations - perhaps the greatest problem facing humanity today - cannot be solved in a way that is consistent with humanity." [8]

Steven C. Rockefeller, a fourth generation member of the family, has remained dedicated to the family's history of philanthropy and promotion of population control. He played a central role in the writing of the United Nations Earth Charter, and chaired the Earth Charter International Drafting Committee from 1997 to 2000. He is currently a member of the Earth Charter Commission. [9] Echoing past writings of Osborn and others, he stated in an interview at Tilburg University in the Netherlands that,

"Third, the Earth Charter recognizes that the dramatic rise in human population is putting great pressure on the resilience of ecological systems and has overburdened social and economic systems." [10]

The Earth Charter itself says, "An unprecedented rise in human population has overburdened ecological and social systems. The foundations of global security are threatened. These trends are perilous but not inevitable."

Others involved in the post WWII shift

Before we look at recent examples of population reduction being funded and carried out, there are other prominent individuals who played an important role in this shift from eugenics to population control.

Frank Notestein was one of the most prominent individuals who made the study of population an institutional practice. His bio summarizes his numerous memberships, which include the American Eugenics Society.

"He was a member of the American Eugenics Society, the American Philosophical Society, the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Statistical Institute, the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, the Population Association of America, and the Century Association." [11]

Notestein also served as president of John D. Rockefeller's Population Council after Frederick Osborn stepped down. He was also the first director of the United Nations Population Division from 1946-1948. In a 1969 paper written by Notestein titled The Problem of Population Control, he outlines a strategy to depopulate target populations. Notestein admits that economic modernization would "...bring the birthrate down automatically." However, he goes on to state that more drastic measures must be taken because in his opinion this method would not be fast enough. He writes,

"Given existing preferences in family size, governments must go beyond voluntary family planning. To achieve zero rate of population growth governments will have to do more than cajole; they will have to coerce."

" impose more drastic changes on a large scale implies many risks, not least to the regime that undertakes them. The price for this type of population control may well be the institution of a totalitarian regime." [12]

Another individual, Guy Irving Burch, who wrote for Margaret Sanger's Birth Control Review publication, also played a key role. Burch's 1947 book Human Breeding and Survival combines the ideas of both eugenics and population control. He writes,

"It appears what the United Nations needs to do is to recommend to all nations that adoption of laws which will... actually lead to the sterilization of all persons who are inadequate, either biologically or socially, and encourage the voluntary sterilization of normal persons who have had their share of children."

Burch described plans for attaining "peace goals" and national security objectives through population control. Similar arguments and proposals are made in Henry Kissinger's later 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200, which was influenced by the 1944 Royal Commission on Population. Burch states that, "... if we are willing to keep the focus on undesirable parentage... then sterilization can play a rather large part in the attainment of the peace goals..."

Richard C. Reardon writes again in his Eugenics Connection work in progress regarding Burch, pointing out the shift from Galton era eugenics to Malthusian population control,

"The ideas of Galton were becoming unpopular, so the ideas of Malthus needed to be stressed. If the public could be made to believe in the need for quantity control, they would again accept its logical extension - quality control. So in 1940, while serving as director of his Population Reference Bureau and the editor of its Population Bulletin, Burch helped found another "population" front for eugenicists - the Population Association of America." [13]

Population reduction operations today

In 1989 research was conducted by the National Institute of Immunology in New Delhi India on the use of 'carriers' such as Tetanus Toxoid and Diphtheria to bypass the immune system and deliver the female hormone called human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). The research paper was carried in the Oxford University Press in 1990 and was titled "Bypass by an alternate 'carrier' of acquired unresponsiveness to hCG upon repeated immunization with tetanus-conjugated vaccine." [1]

While hCG is required to maintain pregnancy, the injection of hCG bound to Tetanus Toxoid triggers an auto-immune response, thus causing sterilization. The NII research cited above used four women as test subjects - who had been surgically sterilized prior to the experiment - and found that multiple doses of the Tetanus Toxoid hCG carrier vaccine was required in order to achieve the desired results. The research also found that if an alternate carrier such as Diphtheria was used as a booster in combination with Tetanus the sterilization vaccine would be more effective.

The Rockefeller Foundation and the Population Council are listed in the document as giving grants for the research.

Henry Kissinger's 1974 National Security Memorandum 200 document cites "Injectable contraceptives for women" as a possible method of population reduction and control. Depopulation, as stated in the document, should be pursued because it would be in the "...economic interests of the United States."

"Wherever a lessening of population pressures... can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States."

On November 4, 1996 the publication Vaccine Weekly carried an article titled "Study Suggests Women Were Injected with Contaminated Tetanus Vaccine." The article details an investigation that was carried out by the Philippine Medical Association into the discovery of hCG in tetanus vaccines. While the article brands the vaccine as being "contaminated", the Rockefeller funded research cited above indicates that this is not a case of contamination. As reported,

"Have women in the Philippines, and possibly elsewhere, surreptitiously been used as guinea pigs in an international anti-fertility campaign?

A medical study in the Philippines suggested that may well be the case. A study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association on behalf of the Philippine Department of Health revealed that almost 20 percent of the tetanus vaccine sampled positive for the hormone human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), according to Human Life International.

Vaccines containing the hormone immunize women not only against tetanus but also against pregnancy by inducing the body's immune system to attack the hormone needed to bring an unborn child to term." [2]

Thailand is ripe with stories of miscarriages and sterilization. According to the local population of the Akha, pregnant women are forced to receive a tetanus vaccine in order to get ID cards for their children. The vaccine often results with violent miscarriages. In the video below, Matthew McDaniel, a human rights activist who has been working with the Akha people of Thailand, speaks with two Akha women about the forced Tetanus vaccine and the resulting miscarriages.

The current world-wide focus on global warming takes us to another angle of present day population control operations. China has boasted that their family planning policies have cut their carbon dioxide emissions by 1.3 billion tons, thus cutting their impact on supposed man-made global warming. [3]

China's often brutal population control policies have been supported by the Rockefeller enterprise. The Washington Post reported on October 12, 2000 that the Rockefeller Foundation had donated two million dollars to upgrade a Chinese drug factory that produces the abortion drug RU-486. The Washington Post reports,

"RU-486 has been a key ingredient in China's population control strategy for years. Of the estimated 10 million abortions performed annually in China, about half are carried out with RU-486, said Gao Ersheng, director of the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research." [4]

Ted Turner recently made headlines when he stated that "voluntary" one child policies should be adopted worldwide to slow population growth. "...we`ve got to stabilize population. On a voluntary basis, everybody in the world has got to pledge to themselves that one or two children is it," stated Turner. [5]

In Australia proposals have been made to tax parents who have more than one child. As CNS news reported,

"Having babies is bad for the planet, and parents of more than two children should be charged a birth levy and annual tax to offset the "greenhouse gases" their child will be responsible for over his or her lifetime.

At the same time, those who use and prescribe contraceptives and sterilization procedures should earn tax relief for such greenhouse friendly services" that help to keep the population size down." [6]

In a 1994 presentation before the Business Council for the United Nations, David Rockefeller, son of John D. Rockefeller Jr., took time to talk about over-population as a threat to the environment. Rockefeller also said that "...unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment."

Watch Rockefeller's presentation:

What you have read here is a collection of a few of the major points in an expansive history. Population control today - and the corresponding environmental movements - grew out of the post WWII shift from eugenics to Malthusian programs. The line connecting eugenicists to population control is unmistakable. Population reduction is being used by the elite as a weapon of war against competition, as an assurance of continued domination.


From quality control to quantity control

[1] Law of the People's Republic of China on Maternal and Infant Health Care.

[2] Reardon, David C. The Eugenics Connection: Shapers of Humanity. Available in PDF here

[3] Ibid.

[4] "We're all doomed! 40 years from global catastrophe - and there's NOTHING we can do about it, says climate change expert" Daily Mail. By Sarah Sands. March 22, 2008. Available here.

[5] "The horrifying roots of Nazi Eugenics" History News Network. By Edwin Black. Nov. 24, 2003. Available here

[6] Population Council FAQ.

[7] Wikipedia. American Eugenics Society.

[8] Osborn, Fairfield. Our Plundered Planet. Little Brown and Company, Boston; 1st edition, 1948. p. 41.

[9] Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Steven C. Rockefeller.

[10] Steven Rockefeller: The Earth Charter. Interview by Patricia Morales.

[11] Princeton University Library. Frank W. Notestein.

[12] Ed. Hauser, Philip Morris. The Population Dilemma. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1969. pages 145 - 166

[13] Ibid. 2.

Population reduction operations today

[1] A copy of this document can be obtained at the Oxford Journal website here:

[2] "Study Suggests Women Were Injected with Contaminated Tetanus Vaccine" Vaccine Weekly. Nov. 4, 1996.

[3] "'One-child' policy aids climate change battle: China" AFP. March 11, 2008. Available here

[4] "Chinese To Make RU-486 For U.S." Washington Post. By Philip P. Pan. October 11, 2000. Available here

[5] "Ted Turner Pushes One-Child Policy In PBS Interview". NewsBusters. By Tim Graham. April 5, 2008. Available here

[6] "'Tax Parents for Children's Carbon Emissions'". By Patrick Goodenough. December 10, 2007. Available here

BBC Show Engages In Chaotic, Rambling 9/11 Truth Debunk-Fest



BBC Show Engages In Chaotic, Rambling 9/11 Truth Debunk-Fest
Alex Jones faded out of uninformed "debate" whenever he raised salient points


Steve Watson
day, April 30, 2008

A Popular BBC talk radio show yesterday engaged in 45 minutes of uninformed debunking and ridicule of "9/11 conspiracy theories", interspersing questions over the official government version of events on 9/11 with barely intelligible members of the public talking about fake moon landings and Joan of Arc not actually being burned at the stake.

Alex Jones was invited onto the Richard Bacon show on BBC Radio Five Live, the BBC's talk radio station, but could barely get a word in edgewise before being faded out of the discussion and countered by a series of debunkers, two of whom frequently admitted to knowing very little about what was being discussed.

"Everybody stop, I don't know what the hell anyone is talking about" announced presenter Richard Bacon after the first few minutes, a statement which accurately summarized the total lack of awareness the debunkers had of any subject Alex Jones attempted to bring before them.

Alex was the sole "conspiracy theorist" (read: informed individual) up against three other debunkers, including Guy Smith, producer of the BBC Conspiracy Files series, the show responsible for a poorly researched and bias hit piece against the 9/11 truth movement last year.

"It depends, I don't know, I haven't looked into it in real detail" was the stable response of both the studio guests to Alex's detailed rants about events such as the attack on the USS Liberty and the Gulf of Tonkin incident, both now corroborated as staged false flag events by declassified government documents, as well as the infamous green lighted Operation Northwoods.

Citing the Iran-Contra affair and the Watergate scandal, one debunker stated "They were found out, people were punished, why is this not happening with the 9/11 conspiracy?" seemingly unaware of the huge progress the 9/11 truth movement has made over the past six years and the public statements of support for the movement from hundreds of engineers, scholars and former government and intelligence officials.

"No evidence has been given for 9/11" the debunker continued, while Alex, trying to counter and give evidence of a cover up, was faded out.

The two debunkers are clearly unaware of the basic fact that there would not have even been a 9/11 Commission, totally lacking though it was, had it not been for activists demanding explanations to unanswered questions.

The conversation eventually moved on to WTC building 7 after one surprisingly intelligible caller broached the subject.

After Guy Smith announced that the BBC would soon be releasing a new documentary devoted to Building 7, presumably given that they completely omitted the topic in their last hit piece, a strange new debunker was introduced as "Ronald Wick".

Mr Wick was introduced as a broadcaster in New York and "a well known 9/11 conspiracy theory debunker", yet having written about the 9/11 truth movement and the attacks for over six years, I have never heard of the man, neither has Prisonplanet editor Paul Watson and neither has Alex Jones. Furthermore, a Google search produces no related results. Seemingly then "Ronald Wick" is either not a "very well known" debunker or is hiding behind a pseudonym.

"Wick" attempted to counter revelations that the BBC had reported the collapse of building 7 a full 26 minutes before it's actual fall by suggesting that everyone had expected the building to collapse from fire damage for hours before it did. This claim does not hold up when put into context with statements from firefighters, reporters and first responders on the ground who have stated that they had to literally run for their lives when a 20 second demolition countdown began and the building suddenly fell.

"Wick" and the other debunkers also attempted to suggest we believe the BBC were somehow "in on the conspiracy" and were specifically approached and fed with a "script of events" on 9/11 because, according to Guy Smith, laughable though this opinion is, it is the media outlet most opposed to George W. Bush.

While others within the truth movement may have postulated this, we have not stated we believe this to be the case. Given that CNN, AP wires and radio stations were also reporting the collapse before it occurred, it is clear the BBC were not "hand picked" to read a script, by whoever carried out the attacks. Furthermore, the fact that BBC anchor Phil Hayton was recently shocked to learn of the pre-collapse reports, also suggests a more general announcement of the building's impending destruction was announced.

"Wick" also accused Alex Jones of lying when he said that firefighters had told people to get back because they building was going to be "brought down". Multiple witnesses have attested to this, and we even have video of firefighters stating "get back, the building is about to blow up". NIST has even promised to examine the claims of explosives in 7 in it's official report, finally due out this summer.

As Alex was faded out "Wick" stated "you are not telling the truth, the firemen did not say it was being brought down in a controlled demolition, that is an outright falsehood" and accused Alex of saying that firefighters were complicit in the destruction of the world trade center buildings, a claim that we have never made and is clearly preposterous given the loss of life suffered amongst fire crews in the towers.

As Alex was again faded down, the debunkers contradicted their earlier assertions that fire caused the collapse of 7, by suggesting that there was critical damage from the falling debris of the towers which gouged out huge chunks of the building causing it to later collapse straight down into it's own footprint in 6 seconds, a contention that is neither supported by witness statement, nor substantial photographic evidence nor by any official statement or report.

"Wick" also weakly attempted to frame the debate on the fact that 1800 degree molten steel was found under all three collapsed buildings. Given that it is undeniable that Molten steel was present, "Wick" attempted to shift the focus of the issue by stating that explosives could not cause heat strong enough to cause molten steel and that you can "place your hand" on an area where a shape charge has been set off.

According to engineering and physics experts, including former Brigham Young professor Steven Jones, buildings not destroyed by explosives would have insufficient directed energy to produce the large quantities of melted metal that was discovered. The "flowing" molten steel was found five days after the collapse, on Sept. 16, when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) used an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) to locate and measure the site’s hot spots.

The USGS Spectroscopy Lab produced images which showed dense thermal hot spots days and weeks after the attacks. ABC News reported that, "the temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to."

It requires temperatures of at least 2800 degrees fahrenheit to melt steel. Steel supports were "partly evaporated," but it would require temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel. The fires in Building 7, fueled by office furniture and small amounts of debris alone could not have reached temperatures anywhere close to this, indicating that extra explosive and/or reactionary forces were responsible for the molten steel and raging underground fires.

Any rational person who listened to this chaotic exchange will have gone away wanting to hear more from Alex Jones, who draws his knowledge and discussion points from the study of history, declassified government archives, expert analysis and mainstream reports, rather than take heed from the total lack of any insight whatsoever from the two studio guests and the strange accusatory tone and debate framing of the mysterious "Mr Wick".


Wachovia Facing Drug Money Laundering Investigation

Rev. Wright is Right about U.S. Use of Blacks for Medical Experiments, Including AIDS


Rev. Wright is Right about U.S. Use of Blacks for Medical Experiments, Including AIDS

Mike Adams
Natural News
April 30, 2008

Regarding the current controversy about Rev. Wright and U.S. Presidential candidate Barack Obama, Rev. Wright is actually quite correct about the U.S. government’s exploitation of black Americans for medical experiments (and worse). What Rev. Wright is saying about the way the U.S. government has treated blacks in the last 200 years is remarkably accurate to anyone who has bothered to actually study American history. For starters, I recommend you read A People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn, which will give you quite a horrifying account of how the FBI sought to assassinate black leaders, how law enforcement authorities looked the other way when crimes were committed against blacks, and many other difficult-to-believe (but true) facts about the history of America.

But that’s just the beginning. The real horrors become even more clear when you look at the history of blacks being used for medical experiments in the United States. The Tuskegee experiments only scratch the surface. In reality, the history of conventional medicine in the U.S. is filled with true accounts of black women, black prisoners and black babies being openly used in extreme medical experiments where they were injected with deadly substances, denied medical treatment to see what might happen as the disease progressed, and even used in government-sanctioned experiments like the EPA’s recent experiments on toxic chemicals in low-income children, which happened just a few years ago in New York.

Skeptical that any of this really happened? Maybe you just haven’t learned any of this yet. To help you out, I’ve published a list of just a few of the medical experiments conducted on blacks, minorities and prisoners in the United States. You can read the list yourself here:

Part two is here:

One account included in that list reads as follows:

1963: Chester M. Southam, who injected Ohio State Prison inmates with live cancer cells in 1952, performs the same procedure on 22 senile, African-American female patients at the Brooklyn Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in order to watch their immunological response. Southam tells the patients that they are receiving "some cells," but leaves out the fact that they are cancer cells. He claims he doesn’t obtain informed consent from the patients because he does not want to frighten them by telling them what he is doing, but he nevertheless temporarily loses his medical license because of it. Later, Dr. Southam becomes president of the American Cancer Society.

As you can see, not only are these human medical experimentation doctors NOT convicted of their crimes against blacks and minorities, they are promoted to top positions in the medical establishment!

It gets worse: The genocide continues even today

And yet, despite all the horrifying history of medical experimentation on blacks and minorities in the United States — much of it sponsored by the U.S. government — the situation is even worse today because conventional medicine is engaged in a deliberate effort to deny black people access to the truth about sunlight, vitamin D, cancer and skin color. As NaturalNews readers well know, the reason breast cancer and prostate cancer rates are so much higher in black women and men is because dark skin pigmentation blocks the healing UV rays that create vitamin D in the skin, thereby leaving black men and women chronically deficient in vitamin D. That deficiency, in turn, greatly boosts their rates of cancer — by nearly 500%! (The cancer industry loves this, by the way. It means lots of repeat business for cancer drugs and mammograms in the future.)

But instead of educating black men and women about this simple connection, the modern cancer industry (and medical establishment) refuses to tell black people the truth, thereby enslaving them in a system of high-profit medical treatments, all while pretending they have no idea why breast cancer is so much more aggressive in black women. Read my article, Vitamin D Recommendation Missing From Breast Cancer Task Force Report on Black Women at

Today, I’ve posted a scathing audio podcast on this topic, accusing the modern medical establishment of being engaged in crimes against blacks through its unwillingness to tell people the truth about why dark-skinned individuals need far more sunlight than white-skinned individuals. This audio podcast dares to tell the truth about the racist policies of modern medicine, and why Big Pharma wants to turn the bodies of black men and women into profit centers. You can listen to it right now at:

Of course, this profit exploitation motive isn’t limited to blacks. Whites, Asians and everybody else are also targeted for medical profits, but blacks are disproportionately impacted by the lack of truthful information about cancer and vitamin D due to their unique skin pigmentation. In other words, the intentional censorship of factual information about sunlight, vitamin D and cancer results in far more harm to black people than anyone else!

Obama sticks his head in the sand

Barack Obama, for his part, is now pretending the U.S. government never conducted medical experiments on blacks, or that it’s "un-American" to even talk of such things. These are the typical lies you’ll hear from any politician running for office, especially when that office is in a country where 99% of the people have been kept in the dark about these matters. In reality, I say it’s un-American to treat black people in the way they’ve been treated throughout American history. I say that all of us — white, black, Hispanic, Asian, Hispanic, etc. — have the right to be treated with dignity, with respect, and with our basic human rights intact. No person, no matter what their skin color, should be used for medical experiments, and when those experiments have taken place, it is the duty of honest citizens and the few remaining honest journalists to publicize those events in order to help ensure they never happen again.

Obama was quoted in the press yesterday as saying about Dr. Wright, "But when he states and then amplifies such ridiculous propositions as the U.S. government somehow being involved in AIDS. … There are no excuses. They offended me. They rightly offend all Americans and they should be denounced."

In other words, Obama is saying that anyone speaking out about the U.S. government’s exploitation of blacks and its involvement in the AIDS virus should be denounced. Note carefully that he did not say the U.S. government’s medical experiments on blacks should be denounced! Rather, the people warning others about such activities should be denounced!

Or, put another way, Obama wants people to just shut up and pretend the U.S. government never committed these evils against blacks. He doesn’t want the truth to come out. He’s running for President, after all, and it’s better to just whitewash important issues than to have to deal with them honestly and openly.

It is never the wrong time to tell the truth

Some say that merely bringing up these topics is divisive and destructive to the country. To that naive criticism, I say this: As a human being, it is my responsibility to do everything in my power to stand up for those less fortunate. From the black babies injected with contagious diseases who couldn’t fend for themselves, to the foster care children who were "recruited" for the EPA’s experiments on chemical toxicity, these babies and children need people like you and me to come to their defense.

They are defenseless: The poor, the young, the children without parents… these unfortunate ones are being swept up into Big Pharma’s deadly medical experiments and the U.S. government’s dangerous experiments for military and industrial purposes. Who will defend them if not us? And how will we ever make sure we don’t repeat these true horrors of American history if we’re not even willing to admit they happened in the first place?

Rev. Wright is telling people the truth about how the government has treated blacks, and it makes Obama nervous. Obama is living in a state of denial, which is actually great practice for becoming U.S. President. Those skills will come in quite handy during future press conferences. What better way to become the first black President of the United States than to deny the history of how the U.S. treated blacks in the first place?

For the record, I don’t know for sure whether the government introduced AIDS into the population, but I’ve read a lot of books on epidemics and the AIDS virus in particular (including books by Len Horowitz, who I highly recommend as an author), and I can state with certainty that I highly suspect AIDS was, in fact, engineered by the U.S. government and intentionally introduced into the population as either a weapon of genocide or a population control measure. It all sounds quite sinister, but once you learn about what the CDC, FDA, EPA and USDA have already done to harm and kill so many people in the last few decades, it’s not a stretch of any kind to consider the possibility that the government may have also been involved in the creation and release of the AIDS virus.

My main point, however, is that regardless of what you think about AIDS and the government, at the very least we should all be able to openly discuss these ideas and debate them without being instantly denounced for merely bringing up the subject.

Remember, those who are the quickest to denounce so-called "conspiracy theories" are those who are least capable of standing up to honest debate. It’s the same for many issues: Vaccinations, fluoridation, 9/11 terror attacks, the AIDS virus, the war on Iraq and many more. Candidates like Obama don’t want the American people to actually think for themselves or question the status quo, because the minute people start questioning the status quo, the whole fragile U.S. economy and Big Brother power centers would start to crumble. The continuity of the U.S. empire depends, in large part, on the continued ignorance of the American public about what’s really true.

Recommended reading: Emerging Viruses: AIDS And Ebola : Nature, Accident or Intentional? by Leonard Horowitz

By the way, if you’re a member of a black church and you’re interested in learning more on this topic, I’d be thrilled to visit your church and present some of this information about cancer, sunlight, skin pigmentation and the conspiracy to deny black men and women access to the information they need to prevent cancer and save their own lives. Just contact me through the NaturalNews offices, and if I’m in your part of the country in the future, I’d be happy to stop by and talk to your church congregation about what’s really going on with the cancer industry and its blatant exploitation of black men and women in this country. It’s not a happy topic, I realize, but it’s one that needs to be told. And I’m not afraid to tell it like it is.

Because here’s the truth in all this: I have information right now that could prevent 90% of all cancer in black men and women. And I’d be thrilled to share that information with people. I personally find the black community to be very open to this information, probably because they are rightly skeptical about the way the medical establishment has treated them for so many decades. They know they’re being lied to, used and exploited by wealthy corporations and corrupt government officials. They know it! They just don’t know where to turn for real answers to this cancer problem.

Mother Nature has the answers, folks, and it’s time we told the truth about cancer so that we can end the pain and disease in the black community that has caused so much suffering (and generated so much money for Big Pharma and the cancer industry). It’s time to stop the genocide and start the healing. If we’re going to move forward, together, as a nation of people who truly have equal rights and equal opportunities, then we’ve got to stop the cancers, stop the censorship and start the healing. It’s the only way to move forward.

Learn more and empower yourself now

Here are some resources where you can learn more:

Downloadable MP3 Audio: Health Ranger Show #30: The Racist Cancer Industry, Blacks and Chemical Enslavement

Special Report: The Healing Power of Sunlight and Vitamin D (Free download)…

Timeline of Genocide: The history of medical experiments on black, minorities and others in the United States, mostly by the U.S. government: