Monday, December 31, 2007

New Years Eve

It appears that the United Nations is trying to brainwash children. They are presenting a comic book. It depicts a war torn country. Also, the comic book describes superheroes working alongside UNICEF aid workers and U.N peacekeepers. It doesn't mention which war torn country. The United Nations is trying to cover up their real image and agenda, but in the 21st century tons of truthseekers know the truth. The United Nations was created in 1945 by the same corporate elite (the same heads of the big banks and the heads of Big Oil like members of the CFR. The headquarters of the United Nations is placed on land donated by the Rockefellers. The Rockefellers is a family known as oil tycoons and elitists) which funded both sides in WWI and WWII plus promoted eugenics (Many of these social Malthusians are here to this day). The U.N. is about trying to merge national sovereignities and enhance the ideals of globalization, population control, and control of foreign policy. The Third World is made stagnant by them (and as a consequence, the Third World's economics is further via the World Bank and the IMF). Real solutions to the Third World ought to be radical true, modern health, electricity, and the modern development of that region of the world. UN peacekeepers have been accused of rape in the Third World and the UN took little steps to stop the genocide in Rwanda. The United Nations is anti-gun and has a statue of a destroyed gun in UN headquarters inside NYC. Techshout from December 29, 2007 discussed on how New Jersey banned sex offenders from using the Internet except for job searching. This is wild since how can you monitor all of the Internet of sex offenders. The problem to deal with in this situation is sex crimes not the Internet. If sick people use the Internet for evil purposes, that is wrong. Yet, there could be a slipply slope because you can ban folks using copyright material in using the Internet and other citizens from using it. It's nothing more than an example of the government controlling more and more of the Internet. It's similar to neo-fascism since the state is granted more power in ruling the power of the people and individuals. Recently, I've seen some videos from Chris Everard. Some of the things I disagree with it, but most of the information was suprisingly accurate about the new world order, the spirit world, Secret Societies, and the space world. Some of the information that I knew. There was new information that caught my eye like how Rudolf Steiner (a member of the OTO and a Theosophist) created a statue called Ahriman. Ahriman is a characteristic of Lucifer according to Chris and looks similar to the demon smoke images on the WTC Towers when both towers were burning. I alreay knew that the Twin Towers look similar to the Masonic emblem of Jachin and Boaz. This symbol is represented by 2 Towers with a globe on the top of each column. It is utilized to represent the entrance of King Solomon's Temple since Freemasonry obsess with King Solomon in allegory. It means the solar and lunar (or masculine and feminine influences) parts of the Universe. Symbolism is throughout many places of the world (like the Pentagram, the obeslik, the sacrab, and others). Some of locations have been built by Freemasons or other Secret Societies. These global political/aristocratic/religious elite (made up of the Vatican and Black Nobility bloodlines in the City of London, etc.) rule most of the policies of the world. That's why the United Nations and the Vatican promote a one world religion (i.e. John Paul II called for a new world order. The United Nations regularly have a World Council of Religions to discuss about world religions). Education has also been manipulated by the elite. For example, socialist John Dewey admitted that he wanted to eliminate the teaching of moral absolutes in public schools. To me, teaching moral absolutes is vital in developing strong students. That's why I'm independently minded in my thinking.

Big Brother seems to be all over the place presently. KNDO in Washington described on how Homeland Security is placing RFID tags on licenses. Ray Massey from the Daily Mail at December 29, 2007 reported that there are new digital cameras in Britian. There are DVD cameras (called concept) recording folks' behavior while driving. While, they want those using a cell phone or smoking while driving to go to jail as high as 2 years. That is extreme, but the UK wants this reality in their own nation. Captain Gatso of the campaign group Motorists Against Detection oppose this plan as classifying it as a surveillance control mechanism against citizens. the National Immigration Institute of Mexico in March wants to monitor all migrants with a microchip in their ID cards (mainly from Belize and Guatamela). Spanish news agency EFE beleive that some in Mexico want migrant workers to have an implantable microchip. This is wild. I don't believe they want the well being of workers. They want control over people. Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD, the former Chief Medical Officer of Finland in 2000 even called for all newborns to be placed with a microchip at birth, so the agenda is there. We should reject these developments of oppressive Big Brother. BBC from Monday, at December 31, 2007 reported on privacy rights being depleted in many other nations like in Greece. 2007 is a wild year. 2007 is much more crazier than 2006. In 2007, there were scandals, Paris Hilton, and the Presidental election heating up. Rudy Giulani is the most Authoritarian candidate out of both parties. For example, he is for the patriot Act. Rudy agrees with domestic surveillance of citizens when necessary. He endorses Big Brother in microchips. He agrees with preemptive warfare with Neo Cons like Norman Podhoretz advising him. The stone cold truth is that most Americans don't want warrantless wiretapes or threatening warfare with Iran when Iran is no where near a direct threat to America or having nuclear weapons. On social issues, Rudy is almost identical to the belief system of Hillary Clinton being pro-abortion. There are other circumstances and stories revolving around other candidates like Ron Paul (who wants no National ID card and is recieving a high level of popularity among young people and civil libertarians), Mitt Romney, John McCain, Fred Thompson, John Edwards, Barrack Obama (who is appearing on BET), Mike Gravel, Dennis Kuinich, and others. One important event is the huge bashlash against illegal immigration that reached new heights in 2007. People accept compassion for human beings whether illegal or legal, but most Americans desire that the borders ought to be protected, laws enforced, and use ways to decrease of illegal immigration in America. Without these actions, there is no real solution to this complex and controversial issue of immigration. Bonesman George W. Bush along with transnational corporations are for this North American integration. Even CFR member Robert Pastor publicly called for international highway and a North American border like scheme in Congress. The North American Union have been exposed on a high level in 2007 via the work of Dr. Jerome Corsi, Dr. Daneen Peterson, and others. The SPP (i.e. The Security and Prosperity Partership) set a foundation for this agenda along with the creation of NAFTA in 1993 (which transplanted jobs overseas and it ruined the economy of Mexico for years). The Trans Texas Corridor, CANAMEX, trade corridors, and other entities are an extension of the North American Union plan. The CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," tells the CFR's support of a common security perimeter around North America. Therefore, it's real. Bret Caldwell from the The Huffinton Post at December 29, 2007 reported on how the House (Republicans, Democrats, and Independents) voted against the Mexican pilot program where Mexican trucks are traveling in US highways with little regulations. Yet, Bush is still carrying it forward when reports show flaws in it like little enforcement of regulations and bad records of their activities. There was also the assassination of Benzair Bhutto in 2007. Typically the media accused al-Qaeda of the unforunate murder. Yet, al-Qaeda was assisted in its creation by the CIA and the ISI. Pakistan is a tool of the Elite to formet this war on terror (with the Wahhabis, who were created by the British. In fact, Saudi Arabia as a country was created by the British via Ibn Saud and headed by many controlled families like the bin Ladens. Controlled Saudi elites were even present in the League of Nations in 1919). Now, the movie Charlie Wilson movie is lying about the Middle East. The truth is that Wilson was a CIA thug organizing the funding of the mujahadeen (who were the forerunning of al-Qaeda. One famous mujadheen was Gulbaddin Hekmatyar) killing tons of Afghanis in the 1980's. Trilateralist Zbignew Brzezinski endorsed this funding of terrorists. Wilson didn't really end the Cold War. The Cold War commenced by a host of factors like Russia's economic problems, leadership problems in Russia, agreements and colloborations between the USA and the USSR. 2008 will be a highly political year. One President will be elected in 2008. Good occurences and bad events are bound to happen next year. Hopefully, more opposition to evil will commence. There is a need of strength and cowardice among us around the world. Now, it's time to welcome 2008. Goodbye 2007.

By Timothy

The Jesuits and other information



Catholic League: For Religious and Civil Rights

Remember it was the Catholic League that started the First Thirty Years's War (1618-1648). That is an irrefutable fact of the Thirty Years's War. The opposite number and defenders of Protestant national sovereignty was The Protestant Union.

Now we have a modern Catholic League which is no less anti-Protestant and anti-Baptist then the first murderous League. The League is full of Knights of Columbus, the hatchetmen for the Jesuit Order "making America Dominantly Catholic."

What a joke! Then Catholic League being for Religious and Civil Rights in the light of the Council of Trent and the Fourth Degree K of C oath.

The Catholic League spokesman is on Fox News regularly.

Brother Eric




A Photo Gallery of some Jesuits who are working in the Near East

Jesuit Jan Bronsveld is the Near East Provincial controlling the capitals of Cairo, Beirut and Damascus.

Brother Eric




Putin: Russia-China interaction helps build just world order

Updated: 2007-12-30 16:24

Moscow -- Relations between Russia and China have a strong impact on the formation of a just world order, Russian President Vladimir Putin said.

"Russian-Chinese relations provide a vivid example of friendly and mutually beneficial cooperation, based on long-term, strategic interests. Russian-Chinese political, economic and humanitarian ties have been developing vigorously, bringing visible benefits to the Russian and Chinese peoples. Strong interaction between our two countries in the world arena is an important factor of building a just world order with due account taken of civilized political-economic diversity," Putin said in a message of greetings to Chinese President Hu Jintao, according to the Kremlin press service.

"The success of the Year of China in Russia and the Year of Russia in China provides a vivid example of the two countries' shared wish to further develop mutual understanding and effective cooperation. The agreement you and I have reached to make the most successful events of the national years regular, will undoubtedly help deepen mutual trust and traditional friendship between our peoples," the Russian president said.




Are John Paul II, Ron Paul and Alex Jones All on Same NWO Team?

According to long time Paul supporter and Jones listener, 'it's all too obvious' if you take time to connect the dots.

By Greg Szymanski
Dec. 31, 2007

The corrupt alternative media, including the GCN and RBN networks and American Free Press newspaper, should "be dismantled piece by piece" and new stations and print outlets allowed to emerge -- outlets not afraid to discuss the Vatican-led New World Order and its many tentacles like the Knights of Malta.

"It is my New Year's hope in 2007 that the alternative media begin to police itself since they are covering for the Vatican and Jesuit Order's involvement in the New World Order," said former military intelligence specialist, Darryl Eberhart, adding it is obvious much of the alternative is controlled since it fails to criticize the Vatican at any level.

And why is it important to begin to seriously question the motives of those alternative media hounds like those in the mainstream media who don't "tell the whole Illuminati story and just blame the Jews or Bilderbergers"?

It's important, say many researchers like Eberhart, because "millions of people now go to the alternative for answers."

One example of the obvious media black out on anything Vatican related can be found daily on the Alex Jones show or called by some the Alex Jones alternative media machine since he has a large media and fan following based on calculated deceptions.

"I know Alex and he has developed a special kind of blindness when it comes to anything related to the Vatican-led New World Order and Jesuit infiltration throughout the centuries," said Greg Szymanski, editor of the Arctic Beacon. "Looking at how he operates, he has to have a higher authority setting his guidelines and basically telling him what to say and how far he can go. And it is obvious by the people he aligns himself with."

Although Jones fools a lot of people by sidestepping the Vatican issue, one long time listener, Rick Friedrich, has finally caught on and is no longer one of them.

In a recent in depth analysis of the Alex Jones, the Papacy and the Ron Paul connection, he said:

"I have compiled further evidence of the incredible delusion and fundamental contradiction of Alex Jones concerning John Paul II. If you never saw it, check out the page on his site where he says the Pope must not have been NWO because of the way he died and how old he was, etc. This is unbelievable. I can't believe how obvious this all is.

"After listening to the Alex Jones show for years, as well as reading his network of websites, there is precious little to be found there about the Vatican corruption in history and in modern times.

"Even though Jones tirelessly rants minute by minute and spouts forth threats of revenge and attacks against this "NWO and their minions," we only find one or two mentions about the Pope's involvement of such! In the below link we find one such example without any comment or reference to the following quote:

"Bush senior proposed that Pope John Paul II become "the chaplain of the New World Order"

Friedrich also starting connecting the dots among Jones, Ron Paul and the Papacy and has now retracted his support for Paul, providing readers with an updated analysis. A full reading of his findings can be found at

Here is a significant portion of Friedrich's important comments:

"We are in desperate times and are all looking for people we can trust. When someone appears to offer an answer we are naturally excited and motivated. I have loosely watched Ron Paul for some 6 years and was excited about him running for President. I even wrote several articles and posted them on my website:

"I was sincere in my research of this person but I did miss some things until last week. I will show some matters below that have completely convinced me of my error and that directly. Since I did present a positive endorsement of this candidate I feel the need to share why I feel I was mistaken. I do not endorse anyone else.

Ron Paul and John Paul.

A few more reasons why I was mistaken.

Ron Paul has recently stated publicly that he opposes a new world order and globalism as well as bodies such as the Bilderberger group's ideas. He said in the recent YouTube Presidential debate that people behind such groups have a "conspiracy of ideas."

On the other hand he is open to making America trade with all nations such as China, Iran, North Korea and Cuba. Ron Paul also praises world leaders such as Pope John Paul II who attended a Bilderberger meeting with Clinton, supported the formation of a European Union, and who called for a New World Order and a one world religion. He called him "one of the great religious leaders of modern times, and an eloquent champion of human freedom and dignity."

"The Pope's commitment to human dignity" was "grounded in the teachings of Christ" which Ron Paul supposed led him to oppose the death penalty. At the end of his first speech on the subject before the House of Representatives, after the Pope's death, he concluded that he was "pleased to pay tribute to Pope John Paul II. I would encourage those who wish to honor his memory to reflect on his teachings regarding war and the sanctity of life "... While these comments focus on a few issues, it is hard to overlook the sexual scandals that have rocked the church pertaining to the sanctity of life under the Pope's leadership (among other serious disregards of the sanctity of life too numerous to mention).

In the second speech Ron Paul praises the Pope for being "a great man of God and peace" and rebukes politicians for not honoring him in such a way during his life, and for "support [of] policies that are totally at odds with Catholic teachings."

He further rebukes them of hypocrisy for having "very short memories." We would ask that same question to the aged doctor with his opposition to the New World Order and the formation of a North American Union if he has either changed his mind or has a "very short memory"? He said further, "Liberals also routinely denounced the Pope for maintaining that Catholicism, like all religions, has rules that cannot simply be discarded to satisfy the cultural trends of the time." Considering that "Catholic teachings" and "rules" never "discarded", still retain the exact 'infallible' doctrines that called for total dominance and prescribed the bloody Inquisition, we find this hypocritical rebuke most astonishing. Despite any claims of regret about the longest and largest holocaust in human history, which also resurfaced during WWII where the same doctrines justified the Vatican uniting with Hitler and other tyrants to resume the same kinds of holocausts, official Catholic doctrine remains the same with no attempts to remove such "Catholic teachings" from their "rules".

He further rebuked the members of Congress while saying "that the Pope's pronouncements were theological, not political." Yet it would be very hard to understand how the actions and words of the leader of the Vatican were not political. Indeed, the doctor as a "very short memory."

Some people who oppose the Globalist neoconservative agenda, as Ron Paul has been well known for, are troubled by the fact that he coauthored a book in 1993 with Lewis E. Lehrman who is a neoconservative and one of the directors of The Project for a New American Century. People may explain away that connection but the late Pope's actions in promoting the United Nations as well as a new world order were very obvious to everyone. Further, the Pope made great efforts to make all world religions into one, contradicting the obvious fundamental differences they all have in reference to origins, meaning, morality and destiny.

While Ron Paul now says he does not support the conspiracy theories of Alex Jones, he has appeared on his show numerous times over the years in a way which gave most people the opposite impression. This has prompted critics like Glen Beck to ask Ron Paul directly what his views about government involvement with 911 terrorism are.

Paul responded to the surprise of many conspiracy theorists that the theories were bizarre and preposterous while advocating that instead it all came down to a bad foreign policy and leadership ineptness. While it is true that the specific theories Beck asked about, which Paul used those words to describe, were one set of theories, Paul nevertheless did give a categorical rejection of all conspiracy theories for that event and used the same language when asked on other programs. Two things that were the most surprising about Paul's belittling statements against what Alex Jones holds as obvious fact, were that Ron Paul claimed to never even hear some of the well known theories Glen Beck had addressed, and that Alex Jones continued his support and respect for Ron Paul in the same way as if the interview never happened.

Firstly, Ron Paul has heard these theories numerous times over the years in numerous interviews on the Jones show, as well as from numerous persons who have corresponded with him both as a Congressman as well as a presidential candidate. This denial is an obvious lie. When I asked the forum what their thoughts were about this, many argued just as Beck said, that he had to lie. Secondly, Alex Jones has been an outspoken and harsh critic of those who disbelieve his theories. His continued support of Ron Paul contradicts many years of criticizing of others who made the exact same statements as Ron Paul has just made. Further, while Jones has avoided almost all discussion about the Vatican and the NWO he did produce an article opposing the Pope a few years ago when he pushed for the NWO

To be consistent, if it were anyone else, Jones would have dismissed Ron Paul as endorsing the NWO for his comments about the late Pope (as well as for they way he dismissed Jones' theories)..

The Alex Jones media machine has been a major contributor to the Ron Paul campaign. Most of Jones' listeners support Ron Paul. The question we have after the Beck interview and the praising statements about Pope John Paul, is why? The two are mutually exclusive. Alex Jones' doctrine and practice has called Ron Paul's views as stated deceitful and cowardly for someone in his position. But he will not act consistently. Instead, he went on the attack against Glen Beck for asking the questions Americans wanted to know about Ron Paul. Even Jones' sidekicks the Watson brothers, who run his websites and write articles for him, thought the interview went very well. But Jones said on his show that he disagreed with these brothers. Very revealing indeed!

Jones has further stated on radio that he was significantly influential in getting Ron Paul to run for President and also that his camp coined the term or started the recent Ron Paul Revolution. During the same period where Paul was distancing himself from 911 conspiracy theories, Jones published totally unsupported claims about NWO assassination plans for Ron Paul:

This was a major subject on the forums for the next week even though there was much action to stop all discussion about it. I'm sure this will bring many thoughts to peoples minds... The Watson and Jones team have continually used these kinds of sensational claims in the past. Notice the strength of the argument in the following statement: " Estulin, whose information has unfortunately proven very accurate in the past, went public with the bombshell news [about a Ron Paul assassination plot] during an appearance on The Alex Jones Show today."

Jones always draws a lot of attention to his industry whenever such prophetically false claims are made to scare his audience. Typical with all cult groups, the prophesy is given with some disclaimer and hope that it will not happen, but the natural impression is given to all followers that it will definitely happen. When it doesn't happen, and the hype is long gone, the disclaimer is then used to justify the sensational prophesy. Jones has done this repeatedly, and actually daily reinforces the false predictions. He is bound to be right one time out of a hundred. But just last year in the summer he gave a very solemn warning that the end was really coming this time. War was about to start up like we have never seen it, within a month. This was special and equal only to his prediction about 9/11 (which he falsely claimed he was the first to warn about). Well actually he did make a real fool of himself and his followers on December 31, 1999. The disclaimer clause in this more resent case was that his listeners could make a difference by activism. Nevertheless the terror continued to scare everyone in the same way that so many cult leaders have scared their sheep.

Lest you think Ron Paul is way above these kinds of things, the fact is that he has continually appeared on the Alex Jones show over the years and has spoken sympathetically with Jones as he made numerous sensational claims. Late this summer, just before the Ron Paul Revolution really took off, Ron Paul made the following statement on the show: "If I were a betting man I would bet that they will attack Iran before the end of this administration, which means in the next year or so. The plans have been laid just like the plans were laid to go into Iraq a long time before they did but they had to wait for the right opportunity."

This fit in perfectly with all the hype Jones was engaged in for the last 3 or 4 years about Iran. First it was April 2005, then Fall of that year. Then Fall 2006. Now we have about a year to go. But now things have changed with Iran. The scare tactics will continue. Both these men criticize the government for scaring the people into following them, but they are on record for doing the same. Every time Alex Jones produces a new scary terrorism video of the nature of an Osama video, which many times features Ron Paul, it successfully draws in more support for this scare media industrial complex. (I should mention here also that GCN is actually owned by ABC!) Alex Jones always asks the fitting question on his show (or at least he used to), Who stands to gain? It should be evident by now. See also A Critique of Alex Jones' Endgam3 Documentary.

Are these predictions and associations and endorsements a sign of hypocrisy and poor judgment or something merely accidental that is not worthy of our attention? Hope and fear for America may be a little more accurate. We hear that Hollywood went on strike but it appears the entertainment has just moved to the Internet.

Here is another video to watch by a patriot wise to how Alex Jones fronts for the Vatican:



Dear Craig,

If the Jesuits controlled the Cecils, and Lord Cecil controlled the Fabian
Socialists, and the Fabians controlled the British Labor Party and BLP's SIS
controlled the Bolshevik Revolution after which the Jesuits were readmitted
into Russia in 1922 (and Lenin converted the USSR to the Jesuit authored
Gregorian Calendar in 1923), the the Jesuits via the Cecils brought about
the Bolshevik Revolution. Correct?

Brother Eric

Dear Eric,

Sounds good to me my friend.  Once again we connect the dots with truth lines.  I'm glad you've bought up the Calendar as I've been going on the Revolution recently but didn't know about the Calendar untill now.  Well we always see, feel and smell the stench of the Jesuit behind everything going on don't we, but once again from the shadows.





People need to learn the truth about J.K Rowlings. She's an utter FRAUD and always has been. All the Harry Potter books were written by the wealthy Railroad speculator, RICHARD POTTER. Richard linked to the Rothschilds and controlled by ultra powerful, Robert Cecil. Please note his daughter was called Beatrix and was a massive Socialist. She married Sidney Webb who was also a Socialist. They have played a massive role in the Socialism of the United States by the controlling Coefficient Club organised by Sidney. Now Rowlings is not an author of these books she was simply an editor but trumped up as the author. Very devious craft books installing the craft into the minds of vulnerable children with predictive programming.







Top American Fascism News: Keeping Track of the Fascists
Hope2012December 31, 2007
Police State America: A look back and ahead (Salon)
Top 10 Rights & Liberties Stories of 2007 (Alternet)
With source links for more information
The President-Tyrant (Harpers)
Bush has declared himself above the law over 1,100 times (with video, MSNBC/Raw Story)
No Vice President is Above the Law (Huffington Post)
Now three members of the Judiciary Committee are calling for Cheney impeachment hearings. Previously, twenty House Members signed on to Kucinich’s impeachment bill. Stay tuned…
Guantanamo Prosecutor Quits: ‘Full, fair, open trials not possible’ (LA Times via Raw Story)
‘Defense’ Secretary Gates Advocates Invading Tribal Areas of Pakistan if he feels like it (The Nation)
Big Brother: DARPA’s Control Freak Technology (Global Research)
Bush’s Secret Shredding Soars (Radar Online)
The Lawless Surveillance State (Salon)
EXCERPT: “There are several vital points raised by the new revelations in The New York Times that “the N.S.A.’s reliance on telecommunications companies is broader and deeper than ever before” and includes both pre-9/11 efforts to tap without warrants into the nation’s domestic communications network as well as the collection of vast telephone records of American citizens in the name of the War on Drugs. The Executive Branch and the largest telecommunications companies work in virtually complete secrecy — with no oversight and no notion of legal limits — to spy on Americans, on our own soil, at will.”
Nearly 1,300 words into Sunday’s New York Times article revealing new details of the National Security Agency’s domestic eavesdropping program, the lawyer for an AT&T engineer alleges that “within two weeks of taking office, the Bush administration was planning a comprehensive effort of spying on Americans’ phone usage.” (Raw Story)
Only 6 States Oppose National ID Card Plans (USA Today)
Pentagon Poised to Resume Open Air Weapons Testing (Scoop, New Zealand)
Freedom is Not Free – And Americans Are Poised to Lose Everything Part II (JustAnotherCoverUp)
On the Homegrown Terrorism Prevention and Thought Crime Prevention bills
Domestic Spying, Inc (CorpWatch)
EXCERPT: “A new intelligence institution to be inaugurated soon by the Bush administration will allow government spying agencies to conduct broad surveillance and reconnaissance inside the United States for the first time. Under a proposal being reviewed by Congress, a National Applications Office (NAO) will be established to coordinate how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and domestic law enforcement and rescue agencies use imagery and communications intelligence picked up by U.S. spy satellites. If the plan goes forward, the NAO will create the legal mechanism for an unprecedented degree of domestic intelligence gathering that would make the U.S. one of the world’s most closely monitored nations. Until now, domestic use of electronic intelligence from spy satellites was limited to scientific agencies with no responsibility for national security or law enforcement.
The intelligence-sharing system to be managed by the NAO will rely heavily on private contractors including Boeing, BAE Systems, L-3 Communications and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). These companies already provide technology and personnel to U.S. agencies involved in foreign intelligence, and the NAO greatly expands their markets. Indeed, at an intelligence conference in San Antonio, Texas, last month, the titans of the industry were actively lobbying intelligence officials to buy products specifically designed for domestic surveillance.”
Disarming the Populace and the Tyranny of Gun Control (Stop Lying blog, Canada)
Russian General says Pentagon seeking direct confrontation with Moscow (Int’l Herald Tribune)
The United States remains unprepared for disasters ranging from biological attacks to a flu pandemic, and funding for preparedness is falling (Reuters/Yahoo)
Homeland Insecurity (Business Week)
“This is the first of three stories on the challenges and opportunities faced by the Homeland Security Dept. as it develops technology aimed at keeping the U.S. safe.”
Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians (Judicial Watch)
Four presidential candidates make the list. Can you guess which ones? There’s an apparent attempt to crash the server; keep trying.
NORTHCOM: Constitution Irrelevant (BlackListed News)
Deception Detection: Project Hostile Intent (Homeland Security)
Over 1000 lawyers have signed statement demanding investigation into unconstitutional and criminal activity by the Bush administration (The Nation)
“Homeland Security” finalizing plans for domestic spy satellite program (Raw Story)
Bush seeks to limit military lawyers’ independence (Int’l Herald Tribune)
EXCERPT: “Former JAG officers say the regulation would end the uniformed lawyers’ role as a check on presidential power because politically appointed lawyers could block the promotion of JAGs who they believe would speak up if they think a White House policy is illegal…Through the past several years, the administration has repeatedly proposed changes that would impose greater control over the JAGs. Each previous proposal has died in the Pentagon or Congress. The new proposal goes further than anything the administration has pushed before because it would affect all military lawyers, not just the top JAG for each service.”
The Sole Superpower in Decline (ZMag)
Icelandic woman arrested and shackled for overstaying visa 10 years ago (MSNBC)

Video: 'The most conclusive evidence' Bhutto was shot

NAFTA and the North American Union

Rudy Giulinai will convert America into a Police State


Rudy Giuliani will Convert America into a Police State
Debt PrisonDecember 31, 2007

Rudy Giuliani’s authoritarian leadership style is ideal for continuing our government’s assault against personal liberties. Between Presidential Executive Orders and Congressional Bills, our government is ramping up it’s surveillance on U.S. citizen’s. Big Brother has developed a voracious appetite for information gathered on its tax payers and continues to implement new ways of accomplishing this invasion to our privacy. Just this week CNN aired a story on the Justice Department’s tracking of U.S. citizens through their cell phones, even when the phones are turned off. Judges are giving the Department the go-ahead even if a crime does not appear to be eminent. The details for this process are kept quiet and the discretion for who qualifies as a trackee is left up to law enforcement.
During the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, law enforcement in New Orleans went door to door confiscating the guns of law abiding citizens. What worse conditions could you possibly envision for needing to protect your personal property and life – than the aftermath of that storm in a crime ridden city? These actions seem like the perfect policies for ‘law and order’ candidate Rudy Giuliani. His own words indict him; “Freedom is not a concept in which people can do anything they want….Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority.” Giuliani made the statement in 1994 just before becoming Mayor. This sounds like the anthem for Kim Jong il of North Korea in his defense of an Authoritarian regime. Who get’s to decide the extent and meaning of lawful authority? Why Mr. Authority himself…..Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
It is the duty of all people to question the authority by which they are ruled. Where would America be today if the Founding Fathers hadn’t questioned the lawful authority of our ruling British King? What if Martin Luther King hadn’t questioned the lawful authority of Southern Laws written to deny the Black Community equal rights? As Mayor of New York Giuliani kept gun laws tight, making it nearly impossible to obtain a permit to carry a concealed weapon. Sure crime and murder rates went down while Rudy was Mayor. However, does anyone actually think that citizens applying for gun permits were the one’s committing violent crimes? Giuliani supports bans on “assault weapons” of which any semi-automatic could be classifed. He also supports all citizens be required to have a license to carry a gun (comparing it to getting a driver’s license). I can only imagine how Rudy hopes the Supreme Court will rule this Spring on whether hand guns will be allowed in Washington D.C..
Rudy is the preferred candidate for the Police State. Giuliani believes that by violating the liberty of law abiding citizens, you guarantee additional security and safety. American’s should flee from this ridiculous ideology. I’m never surprised by a Democrat’s belief that confiscating tax payer dollars for social programs is a noble cause. But when conservatives begin embracing the idea that law abiding citizens should be monitored for ‘their own safety,’ I know the future of our country is dim. Too many times I’ve heard conservatives state “I don’t care if the government monitors my phone calls; I’ve got nothing to hide!” When Guliani gets through it won’t matter, you can’t do much harm to society when all you’re allowed is a pre-Civil War musket.
This concept of preemptive strikes became popular along with the legislation of ‘preemptive surveillance.’ The government is putting together an entire system of information gathering and surveillance, designed to prevent crimes before they happen. Law abiding citizens should never have to relinquish liberty because of the actions of criminals. Our government has capitalized on our nation’s state of fear following the tragedies of 9/11. Congress justifies its actions, advertising that citizens sacrifice their liberty, to ensure that another plane isn’t hi-jacked. The institution that can best grip security is the individual private citizen.
Take an objective look at the changes implemented since 9/11. Airport security micromanages the contents of your bags while you remove clothes for shoe bomb inspections. Would any of these new laws and regulations have prevented 9/11? I sincerely doubt it. If anything, couldn’t the government have denied citizenship and entry to individuals from Muslim countries? This would have prevented the tragedy on a cool September morning, while at the same time upheld the liberties of our citizens. So we must suffer for political correctness and the ever increasing Police State. If anything, Rudy Giuliani will increase these violations of liberty and the appetitie of Federal Power over its citizens. Rudy should be rejected out right for these reasons alone.
Reason Magazine has Giuliani on the cover this month with the title “The Liberal Candidate.” Is the ex-Mayor the best that the Republican Party has to offer? If so, then Conservatives are in trouble. He combines the worst traits from both Conservatives and Liberals. Gun laws will be tightened and the surveillance powers of the Federal Government increased. In addition, Giuliani would open new doors for homosexual interests while massaging the Supreme Court with a Justice whom wouldn’t disturb women’s civil rights offered by Roe vs. Wade.
Rudy Giuliani. The Mayor of New York who put citizens in jail for washing windshields. These people would step out into the traffic, wash your windshield, and then demand you pay them. The horror….these panhandlers! Giuliani, Mr. Law and Order, put a stop to this horrific act of criminal behavior. At the same time, Giuliani supports the power of the Government to confiscate tax dollars from unwilling citizens, and pay for Doctors to cut live infants from the wombs of their mothers. Conservatives have got to love a man like that.
I’ve heard the conservative voices cry “you must have safety before you have liberty.” Where did these people come from? When did conservatives decide that an individual’s security was best protected by Big Brother? There are frightening circumstances worst than 9/11. An entire nation existing, working, and monitored for the enjoyment of rich elitists – that is my nightmare.
It’s obvious that our ever increasing Police State has nothing to do with security and safety. These programs are promoted and installed to steal your liberty and enhance the powers of the Federal Government. Want proof? While the government has ramped up it’s policing of citizens – non citizens cross our borders unprohibited. Latin, Middle Eastern, and even Chinese immigrants cross into our country illegally with each passing day. The Federal Government not only ignores it, but encourages it. Our “News” media supports these crimes as well, with constant sympathetic stories on the hardships of immigrants. Stories designed to tug on the strings of your heart – not the logic of your intellect. By ignoring our own immigration laws and creating a ‘come on down’ atmosphere, we allow Islamic fundamentalists to flank us. And how does Rudy Giuliani proclaim to solve this issue? “Illegal who?…..let’s invade Iran!!!!” This is the country where 15 of the 19 hi-jackers didn’t come from. If the government was serious about security, wouldn’t it correct undocumented immigrants before sacrificing liberty was even discussed?
The fact is, as human beings, we must accept that life is dangerous. Absolute security is impossible. The degree to which we ask Government Powers to assume security should be kept in check. With each new level of responsibility the Federal Government assumes, the liberty of individual citizens must be sacrificed. It’s a simple question. In the United States of America – where do the citizens want the power to be centered? The responsibilities of security, safety, and power should be embraced by individual private citizens as much as possible. Individuals can best navigate their way to liberty and safety.

By placing the responsibility on private citizens and companies, we’re better able to guarantee our security, not only from foreign fundamentalists – but also from a government which strives to obtain Authoritarian control over its populace.
Rudy Giuliani would further the powers of the Police State. This is not good for conservatives, nor any other American. As such, Giuliani should be exposed for what he is. A power hungry Authoritarian devoted to forcing his estranged ideology onto the citizens of this country. By increasing the Authoritarian powers of our Federal Government, he strives to undermine the tiny fraction of individual liberty that remains in our hearts and minds. For this reason he is rejected.Sphere: Related Content

Creeping Fascism: From Nazi Germany to Post 9/11 America


Creeping Fascism: From Nazi Germany to Post 9/11 America
Ray McGovern

AlternetSunday, December 30, 2007

"There are few things as odd as the calm, superior indifference with which I and those like me watched the beginnings of the Nazi revolution in Germany, as if from a box at the theater...Perhaps the only comparably odd thing is the way that now, years later...."
These are the words of Sebastian Haffner (pen name for Raimund Pretzel), who as a young lawyer in Berlin during the 1930s experienced the Nazi takeover and wrote a first-hand account. His children found the manuscript when he died in 1999 and published it the following year as "Geschichte eines Deutschen" (The Story of a German). The book became an immediate bestseller and has been translated into 20 languages -- in English as "Defying Hitler."
I recently learned from his daughter Sarah, an artist in Berlin, that yesterday was the 100th anniversary of Haffner's birth. She had seen an earlier article in which I quoted her father and emailed to ask me to "write some more about the book and the comparison to Bush's America...this is almost unbelievable."
More about Haffner below. Let's set the stage first by recapping some of what has been going on that may have resonance for readers familiar with the Nazi ascendancy, noting how "odd" it is that the frontal attack on our Constitutional rights is met with such "calm, superior indifference."
Goebbels Would be Proud
It has been two years since top New York Times officials decided to let the rest of us in on the fact that the George W. Bush administration had been eavesdropping on American citizens without the court warrants required by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978. The Times had learned of this well before the election in 2004 and acquiesced to White House entreaties to suppress the damaging information.
In late fall 2005 when Times correspondent James Risen's book, "State of War: the Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration," revealing the warrantless eavesdropping was being printed, Times publisher, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., recognized that he could procrastinate no longer. It would simply be too embarrassing to have Risen's book on the street, with Sulzberger and his associates pretending that this explosive eavesdropping story did not fit Adolph Ochs' trademark criterion: All The News That's Fit To Print. (The Times' own ombudsman, Public Editor Byron Calame, branded the newspaper's explanation for the long delay in publishing this story "woefully inadequate.")
When Sulzberger told his friends in the White House that he could no longer hold off on publishing in the newspaper, he was summoned to the Oval Office for a counseling session with the president on Dec. 5, 2005. Bush tried in vain to talk him out of putting the story in the Times. The truth would out; part of it, at least.
There were some embarrassing glitches. For example, unfortunately for National Security Agency Director Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, the White House neglected to tell him that the cat would soon be out of the bag. So on Dec. 6, Alexander spoke from the old talking points in assuring visiting House intelligence committee member Rush Holt (D-N.J.) that the NSA did not eavesdrop on Americans without a court order.

Still possessed of the quaint notion that generals and other senior officials are not supposed to lie to congressional oversight committees, Holt wrote a blistering letter to Gen. Alexander after the Times, on Dec. 16, front-paged a feature by Risen and Eric Lichtblau, "Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts." But House Intelligence Committee chair Pete Hoekstra (R-Michigan) apparently found Holt's scruples benighted; Hoekstra did nothing to hold Alexander accountable for misleading Holt, his most experienced committee member, who had served as an intelligence analyst at the State Department.
What followed struck me as bizarre. The day after the Dec. 16 Times feature article, the president of the United States publicly admitted to a demonstrably impeachable offense. Authorizing illegal electronic surveillance was a key provision of the second article of impeachment against President Richard Nixon. On July 27, 1974, this and two other articles of impeachment were approved by bipartisan votes in the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bush Takes Frontal Approach
Far from expressing regret, the president bragged about having authorized the surveillance "more than 30 times since the September the 11th attacks," and said he would continue to do so. The president also said:
"Leaders in Congress have been briefed more than a dozen times on this authorization and the activities conducted under it."
On Dec. 19, 2005 then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and then-NSA Director Michael Hayden held a press conference to answer questions about the as yet unnamed surveillance program. Gonzales was asked why the White House decided to flout FISA rather than attempt to amend it, choosing instead a "backdoor approach." He answered:
"We have had discussions with to whether or not FISA could be amended to allow us to adequately deal with this kind of threat, and we were advised that that would be difficult, if not impossible."

Hmm. Impossible? It strains credulity that a program of the limited scope described would be unable to win ready approval from a Congress that had just passed the "Patriot Act" in record time. James Risen has made the following quip about the prevailing mood: "In October 2001 you could have set up guillotines on the public streets of America." It was not difficult to infer that the surveillance program must have been of such scope and intrusiveness that, even amid highly stoked fear, it didn't have a prayer for passage.
It turns out we didn't know the half of it.
What To Call These Activities
"Illegal Surveillance Program" didn't seem quite right for White House purposes, and the PR machine was unusually slow off the blocks. It took six weeks to settle on "Terrorist Surveillance Program," with FOX News leading the way followed by the president himself. This labeling would dovetail nicely with the president's rhetoric on Dec. 17:
"In the weeks following the terrorist attacks on our nation, I authorized the National Security Agency, consistent with U.S. law and the Constitution, to intercept the international communications of people with known links to al-Qaeda and related terrorist organizations.... The authorization I gave the National Security Agency after September 11 helped address that problem..."
And Gen. Michael Hayden, who headed NSA from 1999 to 2005, was of course on the same page, dissembling as convincingly as the president. At his May 2006 confirmation hearings to become CIA director, he told of his soul-searching when, as director of NSA, he was asked to eavesdrop on Americans without a court warrant. "I had to make this personal decision in early Oct. 2001," said Hayden, "it was a personal decision...I could not not do this."
Like so much else, it was all because of 9/11. But we now know...
It Started Seven Months Before 9/11
How many times have you heard it? The mantra "after 9/11 everything changed" has given absolution to all manner of sin.
We are understandably reluctant to believe the worst of our leaders, and this tends to make us negligent. After all, we learned from former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill that drastic changes were made in U.S. foreign policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian issue and toward Iraq at the first National Security Council meeting on Jan. 30, 2001. Should we not have anticipated far-reaching changes at home, as well?
Reporting by the Rocky Mountain News and court documents and testimony in a case involving Qwest Communications strongly suggest that in February 2001 Hayden saluted smartly when the Bush administration instructed NSA to suborn AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest to spy illegally on you, me, and other Americans. Bear in mind that this would have had nothing to do with terrorism, which did not really appear on the new administration's radar screen until a week before 9/11, despite the pleading of Clinton aides that the issue deserved extremely high priority.
So this until-recently-unknown pre-9/11 facet of the "Terrorist Surveillance Program" was not related to Osama bin Laden or to whomever he and his associates might be speaking. It had to do with us. We know that the Democrats who were briefed on the "Terrorist Surveillance Program" include House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) (the one with the longest tenure on the House Intelligence Committee), Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-CA) and former and current chairmen of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham (D-FL) and Jay Rockefeller (D-WVA). May one interpret their lack of public comment on the news that the snooping began well before 9/11 as a sign they were co-opted and then sworn to secrecy?
It is an important question. Were the appropriate leaders in Congress informed that within days of George W. Bush's first inauguration the NSA electronic vacuum cleaner began to suck up information on you and me, despite the FISA law and the Fourth Amendment?
Are They All Complicit?
And are Democratic leaders about to cave in and grant retroactive immunity to those telecommunications corporations -- AT&T and Verizon -- who made millions by winking at the law and the Constitution? (Qwest, to it's credit, heeded the advice of its general counsel who said that what NSA wanted done was clearly illegal.)
What's going on here? Have congressional leaders no sense for what is at stake? Lately the adjective "spineless" has come into vogue in describing congressional Democrats -- no offense to invertebrates.
Nazis and Those Who Enable Them
You don't have to be a Nazi. You can just be, well, a sheep.
In his journal Sebastian Haffner decries what he calls the "sheepish submissiveness" with which the German people reacted to a 9/11-like event, the burning of the German Parliament (Reichstag) on Feb. 27, 1933. Haffner finds it quite telling that none of his acquaintances "saw anything out of the ordinary in the fact that, from then on, one's telephone would be tapped, one's letters opened, and one's desk might be broken into."
But it is for the cowardly politicians that Haffner reserves his most vehement condemnation. Do you see any contemporary parallels here?
In the elections of March 4, 1933, shortly after the Reichstag fire, the Nazi party garnered only 44 percent of the vote. Only the "cowardly treachery" of the Social Democrats and other parties to whom 56 percent of the German people had entrusted their votes made it possible for the Nazis to seize full power. Haffner adds:
"It is in the final analysis only that betrayal that explains the almost inexplicable fact that a great nation, which cannot have consisted entirely of cowards, fell into ignominy without a fight."
The Social Democratic leaders betrayed their followers -- "for the most part decent, unimportant individuals." In May they sang the Nazi anthem; in June the Social Democratic party was dissolved.

The middle-class Catholic party Zentrum folded in less than a month, and in the end supplied the votes necessary for the two-thirds majority that "legalized" Hitler's dictatorship.
As for the right-wing conservatives and German nationalists: "Oh God," writes Haffner, "what an infinitely dishonorable and cowardly spectacle their leaders made in 1933 and continued to make afterward.... They went along with everything: the terror, the persecution of Jews.... They were not even bothered when their own party was banned and their own members arrested." In sum:
"There was not a single example of energetic defense, of courage or principle. There was only panic, flight, and desertion. In March 1933 millions were ready to fight the Nazis. Overnight they found themselves without leaders...At the moment of truth, when other nations rise spontaneously to the occasion, the Germans collectively and limply collapsed. They yielded and capitulated, and suffered a nervous breakdown.... The result is today the nightmare of the rest of the world."

This is what can happen when virtually all are intimidated.
Our Founding Fathers were not oblivious to this; thus, James Madison:
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.... The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home."
We cannot say we weren't warned.

George defies Congress

For Mike Huckabee, Opposing Abortion Isn't Just About His Christian


For Mike Huckabee, Opposing Abortion Isn't Just About His Christian Views
Email this article Printer friendly page

by Steven EditorDecember 30, 2007
Washington, DC ( -- Mike Huckabee gave an interview on Sunday in which he said that his opposition to abortion isn't just because he is a Christian. He said he beliefs are based on the Constitution and the idea that human beings have an intrinsic value that government has no right to take away.
Huckabee shared his pro-life views on with Tim Russert on NBC's "Meet the Press," a popular Sunday talk show that frequently features political figures.
Asked to talk about his position against legalized abortion, Huckabee talked about why he's opposed to it.
"Well, that's not just because I'm a Christian, that's because I'm an American," he said. "Our founding fathers said that we're all created equal. I think every person has intrinsic worth and value."
Told that banning abortions would have him imposing his Christian faith on others, Huckabee responded.
"It's not a faith belief. It's deeper than that. It's a human belief," Huckabee explained. "It goes to the heart of who we are as a civilization."
He continued, "If I believe that your intrinsic worth is not changed by your ancestry, your last name, by your IQ, by your abilities or disabilities, if I value your life and respect it with dignity and worth because it is human, then that's what draws me to the inescapable conclusion that I should be for the sanctity of every and each human life."
Huckabee also indicated he believed that life begins at the point of conception and told Russert he doesn't think there's any scientific argument about that point.

As he frequently does with pro-life candidates, Russert tried to make Huckabee appear more extreme by asking him if he would put women in jail who had abortions if Roe v. Wade is ever overturned.
Huckabee responded with the view shared by most of the pro-life community.
"I think you don't punish the woman, first of all, because it's not about--I consider her a victim, not a, not a criminal," he said.
Instead, he said the focus should be placed on prosecuting abortion practitioners who violate the law.

"I think if a doctor knowingly took the life of an unborn child for money, and that's why he was doing it, yeah, I think you would, you would find some way to sanction that doctor," he said.
"There's something to me untoward about a person who has committed himself to healing people and to making people alive who would take money to take an innocent life and to make that life dead," the former Arkansas governor added.
He said physicians should be practicing medicine under the Hippocratic Oath, under which they pledge to heal and not harm patients.
"If you take the life and suction out the pieces of an unborn child for no reason than its inconvenience to the mother, I don't think you've lived up to your Hippocratic Oath of doing no harm," Huckabee concluded.

136: Belz Right, Mahoney Wrong On Whether It’s “Religious Bigotry” To Take Into Account Romney’s Mormonism


136: Belz Right, Mahoney Wrong On Whether It’s “Religious Bigotry” To Take Into Account Romney’s Mormonism

Printer friendly
“World” magazine’s Joel Belz gets it right when he says: “It’s not bigotry for voters to take Mitt Romney’s Mormonism into account….Nobody should feel guilty about raising such questions.” Well, amen! And the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, Director of the Christian Defense Coalition, gets it wrong when he says it is religious bigotry to take into account Romney’s Mormonism. Hear now my interview of the Rev. Mahoney. And do let us know what you think re: this very important issue in our Forum or via email.
136: Hear it now (10,782 kb)

Also, please, if you would like to help us keep our program on the air, you may send us a donation of $25, $50, $100 or more. Make your check or money order out to: “The American View” and send it to:
The American View8028 Ritchie HighwaySuite #315Pasadena, MD 21122
And do, please, continue to pray for the success of our program that it might glorify God. Because, as He says in Psalm 127:1: “Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the LORD keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.”

Sunday, December 30, 2007

United Nations Propaganda Comic Book Designed to Brainwash Kids


United Nations Propaganda Comic Book Designed to Brainwash Kids

Kurt NimmoTruth NewsDecember 30, 2007

It’s a super — as in superhero — way to inculcate the younger generation:
“Marvel Comics and the United Nations are teaming up to create comic books to show superheroes working with the agency to rid the world of conflict and disease,” reports United Press International. “The United Nations and Marvel Comics are working together to develop a comic book set in a fictional war-torn country with superheroes working alongside UNICEF aid workers and U.N peacekeepers.”
No mention of the “war-torn country” this will be based upon, but allow me to offer and example: Yugoslavia. In this example, the United States secretly supported a terrorist group, the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army, and filled their ranks with “al-Qaeda fighters,” delivered by NATO with a bit of help from Germany’s BND.
As engineered, this project helped fuel Yugoslavia’s social and ethnic divisions and create a situation rife for a “peacekeeping” operation. It also helped to have the IMF and bankers working on the destruction of the Yugoslavian economy, ushering in third worldization and blueprinted misery.
Slobodan Milosevic, like Saddam Hussein after him, became a “new Hitler,” with plenty of help from a script-reading corporate media accusing him of directing his army to rape between 25,000 to 100,000 Muslim women.
At the behest of the United Nations and its puppet master, the United States, NATO, in direct violation of its charter, bombed Yugoslavia. “Yugoslavia attacked no NATO member,” writes Michael Parenti. “U.S. leaders discarded international law and diplomacy,” although of course “U.S. diplomacy is something else, as evidenced in its dealings with Vietnam, Nicaragua, Panama, Iraq” and other “rogue nations.”
“The United Nations hopes to bolster its international image damaged by the unilateral diplomatic efforts of some Western countries by teaching children the value of international cooperation,” the UPI continues. “The United Nations said it will distribute the comics to nearly 1 million U.S. children initially, but hopes to reach a broader international audience following the initial release.”
International cooperation, for instance, consisting of the premeditated murder of 500,000 Iraqi children under medieval sanctions and allowing the genocide in Rwanda to unfold with sickening precision. In fact, there is a farrago of nasty stuff the “humanitarian” United Nations has been accused of over the years, although you will not learn about it by way of the corporate media:
“United Nations peacekeeping troops have been involved in a catalogue of crimes and scandals across the globe,” the Scotsman reported in 2002.
During the UN peacekeeping mission to Somalia, it was claimed Canadian, Belgian and Italian soldiers were involved in torture and murder.
An inquiry by the Canadian government of a young Somali man in 1993, found that he had been murdered by its troops and that a senior officer had lied in an attempt to cover up the atrocity. Two soldiers were jailed.
In Belgium, newspapers published photographs of two soldiers holding a Somali boy over a fire. Three paratroopers were prosecuted, but were acquitted by a military tribunal.
An Italian magazine published photographs showing soldiers from the country’s elite paratroop regiment apparently torturing a naked Somali with electrodes and sexually abusing a Somali woman. Two generals who had commanded the Italian force in Somalia resigned.
In January 2000 the United Nations were sued for the first time in its history for alleged complicity in the crime of genocide which drove hundreds of thousands Rwandan Tutsis from their homes.
Two Rwandan women accused the UN, which was meant to be defending their families, of handing them over to their killers or running away.
The families of these women were slaughtered during the 1994 genocide in which 800,000, mostly Tutsi people, were slaughtered by Hutus.

In Bosnia, more than 20 peacekeepers were ejected from the mission for theft and corruption. Nearly four dozen others were sent home after allegedly abusing mental patients at a hospital. Canadian peacekeepers were accused of rape, beatings and sexual abuse of a teenage handicapped girl.
Don’t expect any of this to find its way into a Marvel comic book. Sphere: Related Content

_____________ (The CFR and Bhutto)

Jesuit videos and more

is a new link I found.





The Spirit World



Other videos on NASA

Note by Me: I don't agree with all in these videos, but it is interesting information to look at.

By Timothy


Secret Space Part II





The Old Space Secret Part 1 Videos





Civil rights fears over DNA 'census',,2233299,00.html

Bhutto email named killers weeks before assassination

World Government Fronts, Psycho-social Change Agents (Mae Brussell's articles) (Maureen Dowd is a New Ager)

Ron Paul and Lehrman

QUOTE (CRAIG-OXLEY @ Dec 28 2007, 12:19 AM)
Like Hillary, Giuliani And All Prez Candidates, Ron Paul Is Just Another Vatican-Jesuit NWO Shill, Making Good Political Theatre

Dear Greg,

Wonderful piece and what wit!You may wish to add to this post that the dear friend of Ron Paul, the racially Jewish and now Roman Catholic Louis Lehrman, is a Knight of Malta and a kingpin of the New Right. It was the fearless Betty Mills who alerted me to this over twenty years ago.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric


The Black Nobility and the Jesuits



The Nazis and UFOs




Saturday, December 29, 2007

Bryant Gumbel's hypocrispy

USDA Forces Farmers to Grow Monsanto Frankenfood

Huckabee Exposed as New World Order Puppet

Joel Osteen calls Mormon cult Christianity (which is false)


How sodomy was sold to America



Nicholas Jackson

December 29, 2007
Sodomy, n. A crime against nature. --American Dictionary of the English language, Noah Webster 1828.
Words mean something. Noah Webster knew that well. Just hearing the word sodomy sounds harsh. This is evidence of how far we have slid.
“Whoever, therefore wishes to ruin a nation, has only to get this vice introduced; for it is extremely difficult to extirpate it where it has once taken root because it can be propagated with much secrecy… and when we perceive that it has once got a footing in any country, however, powerful and flourishing, we may venture as politicians to predict that the foundation of its future decline is laid and that after some hundred years it will no longer be the same…powerful country it is at the present.” (Sir John David Michaelis, Commentaries on the Laws of Moses, 1814.
In 1988, 74.9% of the American Public thought that sex between two people of the same gender was always wrong. By 1998, the percentage had fallen to 54.6% (National Opinion research Center, The University of Chicago.)
Perhaps no other movement in the history of America has had so much success in such a short time. We must examine the homosexual agenda’s success in changing American Culture and attempting to redefine the family, not only to understand how to combat it, but to provide a glimpse of the potential of the American Church if only we were so vocal and dedicated.
The Homosexual Agenda
The strategy was revealed 20 years ago in a 1987 article titled, “The Overhauling of Straight America,” and a 1989 book titled “After the Ball.” In which two radicalized homosexual activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen published their plan. Both Kirk and Madsen were highly educated men. Kirk was a Harvard educated researcher in neuropsychiatry, and Madsen had a doctorate in politics from Harvard, and was an expert on public persuasion tactics and social marketing. (The Marketing of Evil, David Kupelian, p.23)
Their strategy was six fold:
1. Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and often as possible. 2. Portray gays as victims, not aggressive challengers. 3. Give homosexual protectors a “just” cause. 4. Make gays look good. 5. Make the victimizers look bad. 6. Solicit Funds(Get corporate America and major foundations to financially support the homosexual cause. (The Homosexual Agenda: (Exposing the Principal Threat to Religious Freedom Today. Alan Sears & Craig Osten, p. 18)
Let’s briefly examine these strategies.
Firstly, Kirk and Madsen in The Overhauling of Straight America, write in regards to talking about gays and gayness, “The principal behind this advice is simple: almost all behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances.” (Sears and Osten p. 18)
“The main thing is talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome.” According to Sears and Osten this will have one of two effects. “1. It convinces people that homosexual behavior is just another lifestyle, or 2. causes them to get so sick of the issue that they throw their hands up in disgust or become exhausted and then withdraw. Either way the homosexual activists win.” (Sears and Osten 17-18)
Portraying homosexuals as an oppressed victim is the second part of Madsen and Kirk’s strategy because it plays into all Americans sense of fairness. This can be seen in the framing of the AIDS debate (primarily spread by homosexual behavior) as a civil rights issue (AIDS was formally called GRIDS, G stands for ‘Gay”) He who frames the argument wins.
This was also seen through the Matthew Shepherd murder case when two non-religious men killed another man for drugs. The case was blown up by the national media to be a homophobic hate crime spurred on by “hateful” evangelicals preaching against sin. In the media Christians are then compared to Hitler and the KKK, instead of Mother Theresa, William Wilberforce (the Christian who abolished the British slave-trade), and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
By piggybacking on the civil rights issue and slandering blacks, homosexuality has become the cause de jour to appeal to liberal sensitivities of fairness and justice. The “Gay Rights” issue is now seen as a “just cause.” Examples of this in Hollywood are the film Philadelphia, where Tom Hanks is fired from his job by discriminating hate-mongers, and Broke Back Mountain where Heath Ledger can’t really live out the true love and life he wants because of an oppressive society. Rather than showing two men living in San Francisco with high discretionary income and a lavish lifestyle they are shown as oppressed and victimized. This idea of making the homosexual appear oppressed and the victimizer bad can adroitly be perpetuated showing scenes of Fred Phelps, (of God Hates Fags lore) protesting funerals which furthers the myth that Christians are mean and bigoted people.
Lastly, soliciting funds for radicalized homosexual groups has been widely successful. Ford Motors, Kraft, Home Depot, Proctor & Gamble and many more corporations indirectly or directly contribute to the advancement of the homosexual agenda. They do this through sponsorship, advertising, donations, and legislative endorsement. Careful coordination with corporations and the media have been tools in the propaganda campaign to mainstream homosexual sodomy. These are the engines that drive the homosexual activist groups such as GLSEN (which are proliferating our schools), and Equality Forum (A lobbying and legislative homosexual group.)
Eric Pollard, the founder of ACT-UP (a militant homosexual group) claimed Hitler’s Mein Kampf as a model for the “gay” agenda. (Sears and Osten, p. 26)
“Something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick- a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of… By clever and persevering use of propaganda even heaven can be represented as hell to the people, and conversely the most wretched life as paradise.” (Mein Kampf)
Kirk and Madsen reiterate Pollards ideas, “We have in mind a strategy as calculated and powerful as that which gays are accused of employing by their enemies. It’s time to learn from Madison Avenue, to roll out the big guns. Gays must launch a large scale campaign to reach straights through the mainstream media. We’re talking about propaganda.” (Sears and Osten p. 27) So far they are achieving their carefully laid out goals.
The Human Face of Homosexuality

We all know friends who are “gay,” and many are genuinely nice people.
What is the real face of homosexuality? Is it the radicalized homosexual trying to legalize sex between men and boys (NAMBLA)? Is it someone like Rosie O’ Donnell or Ellen? Or is it our coworker or family member, our son or our daughter? Is it the people who shut down the local parks for public sex within eyesight of children, leaving condoms strewn around the park? Perhaps it is all of these for sin has degrees of evil.
In my own life I see various shades of this sin that traps so many. A friend of mine once shared with me that he watched his father commit suicide when he was 15. Since then he has engaged in hundreds of acts with other men and is currently in a “monogamous relationship.” Perhaps he is seeking the love of the father he never got. Another young man I know suffered seizures, and increasing paralysis, and died earlier this year from AIDS which he contracted from earlier involvement in homosexual sin. Two friends I know have parents that left their families for another “same sex” partner. Their families have been torn asunder. Behind the glitzy glamour of Hollywood are real people with real sin which has real consequences. Who will speak the truth to these people, to these families?
Counting the Cost
Last year I submitted a resolution to the State Convention of Ohio Baptists urging Christian parents to pull their children out of public school and either home school or provide Christian private education. It was a wakeup call to pastors and parents in our state newspaper due to the advancing homosexual agenda and Darwinian dogma in public schools. Within the next few weeks homosexual activists wrote in and repeated the tired old saw calling me a bigot, or exclaiming that I was spreading hate. One person said there was no gay agenda in schools that the only agenda was for her to get up go to work and pay taxes like every “normal” American. Being called names in a newspaper or blog is a small price to pay. In the future it may not be so easy.

We have already seen in Canada where a free speech chill has come after the passing of hate crimes legislation. The same legislation is being advanced in America (SB 777 in California, and through hate crimes bills.) Canadian Pastors have been fined for speaking out against homosexuality. Programs like Focus on the Family are not able to be aired in Canada.
It is time to count the cost. We have all the freedoms and opportunity now to confront this sin. But time is running out. Will we sit cowardly in our stained glass fortresses while Sir John David Michaelis’ words ring prophetic towards America, “that the foundation of its future decline is laid?”

If a 1-2 percent minority can change the face of American Culture and public policy, then anything can be achieved.
We have both the numbers, and the truth. If speaking the truth is a hate crime. Let us be found guilty.
It’s time for Christians to “get after the ball.”

1, The Marketing of Evil, by David Kupelian 2, The Homosexual Agenda, by Alan Sears and Craig Osten
© 2007 Nicholas Jackson - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Nick is Executive Director of Reform America, and Ohio Coordinator for Exodus Mandate. In addition, he spends time as a free-lance writer articulating the Christian viewpoint into our culture.