Saturday, April 30, 2011

Savant's Research

Let us set the record straight during this last week of Black History Month.
I've heard black Republicans say that King was a conservative Republican.
But I almost always get silence when I ask them for evidence. Yet this absence of evidence doesn't stop them from repeating the claim.
I point out that the KIng estate in Atlanta has stated it knows of NO evidence that King was a Republican.
Moreover, my own research into writings by King scholars and by KING HIMSELF have thus far turned up on evidence.

In fact, my readings of King's own writings--upon which I based a philosophical analysis at the Association for the Study of African-American Life and History--shows quite the OPPOSITE!!!

If anything it shows that Dr. King was a LEFT progressive and maybe even a DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, who saw economic injustice, racial oppression, militarism, poverty and imperialism as part of one UNJUST SYSTEM.

So where is the evidence that King was a conservative?

How do you reconcile this view of Dr. King with his radical LEFT critiques of CAPITALISM and Imperialism?

Kindly explain

And what about Dr. King's idea of an ECONOMIC BILL OF RIGHTS?
How was that compatible with a conservative agenda.

Now tha the Conservative Age is passing, maybe it's time to rediscover the RADICAL and PROGRESSIVE legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Debatable. They had issues, but Jesse Jackson was given important responsibilities by King. Interestingly enough, some scholars point out that King thought Jesse Jackson was TOO CONSERVATIVE, Historian Thonas F, Jackson mentions tha in his book FROM CIVL RIGHTS TO HUMAN RIGHTS: MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR AND THE STRUGGLE FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE.



EkDesiLadki wrote:
Dr. Savant,
May be you can watch this funny bollywood movie called Lage Raho Munna Bhai. Most of the Hindi movies are now available with English subtitles from netflix.
This is about a don who get transformed because of Gandhi's principle. I heard that this movie made great impact in India.
In India there are occasional linguistic/ethnic violence. There were incidents in which Maharastrian(central Indians) mobs beat up north Indians. Usually this will result in Maharastrians living in north getting beaten up too. The movie seems to have inspired people so much that most north Indians welcomed few Maharastrians with garlands when they visited north instead of beating them up. Seems like eye-opener, and prevented large scale violence, also sending a strong signal.
I feel, people can be inspired. We just need that inspiration or that little spark which will cause the "forest" fire.
Thanks for the info. I wish Dr. King had as much moral and spiritual influence in America as Gandhi seems to have still in India.
What I was specifically thinking of was the suggestion made by King (and in one of your posts) that India could perhaps lead the world in the move toward disarmament. Since, as Dr. King suggested, neither America nor the Soviet Union had any inclination to give up the arms race and work for peace, maybe India (in spirit of the Mahatma) could lead the way.
I'm wondering if that's still possible as King thought it was in 1959.
I wish King's influence could be used to both reduce violence within our African-American communities, as well as violence between racial groups....But that's another discussion.

KIng and Labor

If you read King's writings, especially in collection called A TESTAMENT OF HOPE, you will find that Dr. King was always pro-labor. Labor was a part of the alliance forming the Civil Rights Movement. And King's final campaign was an effort in solidarity with Memphis' impoveriahed sanitation workers in their struggle for decent wages, the right to unionize, and collective bargaining. Some of those who were a part of the movement in Memphis in 1968 can now be found marching with public workers in Wisconsin.
And yes, Dr. King would be in Wisconsin fighting the good fight for working people against the corrupt and oppressive plutocracy which Scott Walker represents.



Barros Serrano wrote:

Why else would the rulers after the liberation movements of the 60's make sure that education was dumbed down and ignorance glorified?
When Bob Moese vistied Bmore 2007, he was speaking on behalf of the ALGEBRA PROJECT which he helped to found, and which is fighting for QUALITY EDUCATION as a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.
While chair of SNCC during the 60s campaign in Mississippi, he noted that in those days lack of education was used as a pretext (with Literacy requirements) to exclude Blacks from the right to vote. And, of course, the racist authorities had taken careful measures to insure that most Black Mississippians would be just barely literate.
Now the rulers use poor education to dupe people into movmements (like Tea Party) which are harmful to themselves and mainly sureve the interests of the privileged classes.
Also, people are just easier to control if they're ignorant. Even though Blacks mainly have the NATIVE INTELLIGENCE to avoid the Tea Party charade, many are still dispirited rather than energized. Even if they can smell a rat when some very right wing movment comes at them, that doesn't mean they can easily visuallize a positive alternative. Hence many--not just blacks--become demoralized or cynical. It requires VISION to be able to imagine a better future for which one is willing to sacrifice.
I fear that the dumbing down of education has largely dulled our vision, and the Machiavellian machinations and propaganda of the Right has eroded the healthy idealism of many.



MAX JOKER wrote:

Unions are for SOCIAL
You mean keeping the lazy employeed, right?
They want the world while regula
Thanks for displaying your IGNORANCE of the history of American labor. And your STUPIDITY in believing the old capitalist myth (spread by IDLE RICH) that laziness is the cause of unemployment.
At any rate, we're going to build a more JUST America regardless of what you and other moronic Neanderthal reactionaries say.
And thanks to that fascistic goveernor in Wisconsin, our efforts are getting a remarkable boost.



CaptainDelight wrote:

You guys need a messiah so baaaaaaaaaaad.

A messiah didn't win the victories of the Civil Rights Movement. The PEOPLE did. A messiah didn't win the rights of labor earlier in the 20th Century. Militant workers did.
We leave YOU to your reactionary messiahs like Glenn Beck, Ronald Reagan, George Wallace, Pat Robertson and others who are being left behind by history.

At any rate, the working people were RIGHT to honor King on April 4. He was one of the few who recognized the inseparability of civil rights and economic rights, and who noted long ago that economic injustice is the inseparable twin of racial injustice.
61% of the American people have at least the good sense to side with working people fighting for their rights against the corrupt tyranny of the plutocracy represented by Scott Walker.
The Struggle continues.



CaptainDelight wrote:

It will always be a struggle when you depend on government for everything in your life.
This is the typical disingenuous comment and duplicitous attitude of the Right.
The reactionaries make no bones about using GOVERNMENT POWER to defend corporate interests in Iraq. They don't mind corporate pirate having their bought and paid for politicians from both parties in their hip pocket. They don't mind using big government to strip workers of their rights to collective bargaining. They don't mind using "big government" to deprive women of their rights to make choices about their own reproduction. But let abused working people, oppressed people of color, women or any other subjugated group demand government action on THEIR behalf, on behalf of SOCIAL JUSTICE---and the rightist and racist cry against the "tyranny" of big government is trumpeted throughout the land by venal or deluded partisans of the status quo.
Those without boots are instructed to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. Those who enjoy all the advantages of class privileged are showered with all the generous largesse "big government" has to offer.
The victims of corporate piracy are told to fend for themselves which rightwing officials court and serve corporate interests with all the dubious integrity of well paid political courtesans.
But thankfully, at least 61% of the American people are with the righteous fighters fo workers rights in Wisconsin. And I do believe we can win this struggle.
There will be justice for all, especially those whom King called "the disinherited children of God," and whom Jesus called "the salt of the earth."



CaptainDelight wrote:

I am a patriot who believes in destroying government leeches, communist.
Your pseudo-patriotism is is MAKS behing which you conceal your fascism and racism, Herr Captain. Your call for the MASS EXECUTION of trade unionists is in the tradition of Franco and Hitler. My defense of the rights to collective bargaining and freedom is in the tradition of humanism and democracy.







Texas Bill Would Make Invasive Pat-Downs a Felony

Superman to renounce U.S. citizenship before the U.N.?

Texas Bill Against RU 486 Drug Gets Abby Johnson’s Testimony



Texas Bill Against RU 486 Drug Gets Abby Johnson’s Testimony

by Steven Ertelt | Austin, TX | | 4/26/11 11:15 AM
  •  436
  • Share
The former director of a Planned Parenthood abortion business who is now pro-life is in Austin, Texas at the state capital today to testify in favor of pro-life legislation that would limit the RU 486 abortion drug.
The mifepristone abortion pill has already killed more than 13 women worldwide, including several women in the United States, and has injured 1,100 women in the U.S. alone as of 2006 FDA figures. Johnson will testify today before the Texas Senate on behalf of legislation that would further regulate the dangerous drug and protect women’s health.
The measure, HB 3408 and SB 1780, was inspired by model legislation developed by Americans United for Life and sponsored by Rep. Jodie Laubenberg and Sen. Dan Patrick.
Charmaine Yoest, the AUL president, noted that abortion practitioners are increasingly expanding their market share of abortions through prescription drugs.
“Women and girls are vulnerable to dangerous drugs cavalierly distributed in ways that the drug manufacturers do not advise. This kind of off-label drug use can have deadly consequences,” she told
The bill before the Senate would regulate the dispensing of abortion inducing drugs and would require that they can only be dispensed in accordance with the FDA drug label. The bill would further require that a licensed physician must do a physical examination of the woman before prescribing the sometimes-deadly drugs.
Now a pro-life heroine, Abby Johnson will address the legislation both from her professional experience as a clinic operator in Bryan, Texas, and from her personal life story, having gone through an RU 486 abortion herself.
“It is a real privilege for us at AUL to partner with Abby Johnson and to have someone of her first-hand experience testify on behalf of this important legislation that will protect women and save lives in Texas,” said AUL Vice President for Government Affairs Dan McConchie. “Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers routinely dispense RU 486 off-label in a manner that expands their profits while undermining women’s health. It is important for the legislature to take action now to rein in these dangerous practices.”
Austin Pro-life OB-GYN Dr. Mikael Love will also be testifying regarding the medical standard of care and dangerous side effects of RU-486.
The bill has the support of Texas Alliance for Life, one of the statewide pro-life groups in Texas and the group says the measure would help stop “Planned Parenthood’s off-label use of this dangerous drug.”
Planned Parenthood previously told women using it to use the drug vaginally instead of orally, as recommended by the FDA. That causes the introduction of bacteria that resulted in lethal infections causing their deaths.
Although Planned Parenthood eventually changed its protocol to follow the FDA suggestion to take the drug orally, it still dispenses improper doses of the drug that could still place women at risk.
Rather than backing down from dispensing the abortion drug, Planned Parenthood is increasingly giving it to women, and a 2010survey of Planned Parenthood abortion centers finds a higher number are giving women the dangerous RU 486 abortion drug.
The number of locations dispensing the dangerous abortion drug has risen 130 percent since its last national survey, even though the overall number of Planned Parenthood centers is on the decline.
In January 2008, RU 486 maker Danco Laboratories announced approximately 13 percent of all abortions in the United States involve mifepristone — a number that may seem low but it is double the number of women who used the abortion drug in 2001.
The report also showed 57 percent of places that do abortions now have the abortion drug, compared with just 33 percent in 2001. Ultimately, Danco indicated that 840,000 women in the United States have had abortions with its dangerous drug – a number that is very likely over one million in the two and a half years that have passed.
According to FDA reports as of December 2006, there have now been eight known deaths associated with mifepristone in the U.S., nine life-threatening incidents, 116 blood transfusions, and 232 hospitalizations. In total, more than 1,100 women have had medical problems after using the drug as of that date. The Obama administration has not published new totals, which could have well over 1,500 women in the United States alone facing significant problems after using the mifepristone abortion drug.
ACTION: Contact your Texas legislators here and urge support for the legislation.


Webster Tarpley: Origins of the House of Windsor and Their Thirst for Ulitmate Power

May 29 is Fall of Constantinople Day

Friday, April 29, 2011

Friday Information in Late April of 2011

The Bilderberg Group has been exposed like in no other time in history. It has a more secretive quality than even the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. The meeting places of the Bilderberg Group are protected by international intelligence agencies and specialized police forces. Journalists and truth seekers have risked their lives in enumerable occasions in retrieving determined, accurate facts as it relates to the essence of the Bilderberg Group. A centralized world government has been the nefarious aims of numerous secret orders and high level political organization. The super class or the elite class constantly for thousands of years acquired (via theft, deception, rape, murder, etc.) a huge share of the world’s wealth and resources as compared to the non-elite. Reports from the Bilderberg meetings in Canada in ’06 and in Turkey in ’07 predicted a global housing crash and forecast a prolonged financial meltdown as a result. Exposers of the Bilderbergers have proven that Bilderberger member plan events or plan strategies about events going on in the present and the future. The first Bilderberg meeting took place at Prince Bernhard's Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeek, Holland in 1954. Hugh Gaitskell is in the far corner of the room looing rather sceptical and you can just see him scratching his chin (in an old picture of the meeting). Chairman Prince Bernhard was a leader of the Bilderbergers for a long time. Prince Bernard was Chair of the group until 1976 when he was forced to resign because of the Lockheed bribery scandal. There has been documented evidence that the Bilderberg Group was instrumental in European integration (like the euro and of course the E.U.).

Some Pro-Lifers are using the marathon to fight against abortion. Some runners participate in legitimate causes like trying to find a cure for cancer or diabetes. Others are trying to fight against the plague of abortion. The LIFE or Living in Faith Exchange runners created marathons and other races to raise awareness and fundraising for the pro-life cause. Pat Castle said that he and his team do one marathon as a team each year. Teammasters according to Pat are encouraged to represent LIFE Runners at other events with jersey, prayer, and fundraising. Castle grew up in Sioux Falls, S.D. He’s stationed at the Scott Air Force Base in Illinois. He co-founded his group in 2008 with his running partner Rich Reich. The group has now expanded to included adult and child members from over 16 states and Kenya. He wants to reach the goal of having 100 people since they currently have 89 individuals in their 2011 team. 2 of their runners include Brenda and Aaron Ferrie, who live in Sioux City with their 2 sons. Brenda is a principal at Sacred Heart School and Aaron teaches at South Sioux City Middle School. Both have been part of the team for three years. They believe in the humanity of the unborn by raising money for the unborn. Each believes in promoting adoption. Brenda wants to run to stop abortion since it promotes a healthy, positive environment with a decent message. People want to be a part of a positive. The runners act in a family friendly atmosphere. The 5K can be run by children. The runners want the kids to understand their belief system. Castle said that he gives training and spiritual encouragement in running the races. The running will be on October 15, 2011 in Kansas City. There donors will go into the Alpha Center in Sioux Falls to assist the Fleet for Little Feet crisis pregnancy bus that has provided free ultrasounds throughout the region including Sioux City. According to Castle, he said two LIFE Runners are expected to cross the finish line first — Rachel Linder for the female division and her fiancé Kiplimo Chemirmir for the male. But Castle said all levels of runners are welcome on the team and they have one teammate competing in a wheelchair. People will be given water and food during the races. Some are using donations and prayer. Castle mentions that LIFE Runners can make a difference to save the lives of the unborn and their families. Crossing the finish line for the end of abortion is fine with me. In the end, abortion will be no more. No more tears, no more pain, no prejudice, no more abortion, and no suffering will occur in the future Kingdom of the Lord.

Political theories have a big deal with sociology. There is political realism. Realism is about wants national interest and security over ideology, moral concerns, and social reconstructions. Realism is the use of power politics in achieving what is needed. Realist thinking is similar to the concepts taht are Niccolo Machiavelli's work "The Prince." Some use realism to promote the state interests over ideologies. George F. Kennan, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brezinski, and others believed in a form of realism. Behavioralism deals with using the scientific method to handle human behavior. Constructivism is interesting. Constructivism believes that anarchy is made up of states, but people can use politicies to change the anarchic nature of the system of states. In learning, constructivism is about the theory that humans can generate knowledge and meaning from an interaction between their experiences and their ideas (in education, Seymour Paper, Jean Paiget, and others have believed in constructivism in terms of dealing with education). In education, there are plenty of theories in dealing with education. There is behaviorism and cognitivism. Behaviorism (or the view that the learning of child can influence its behavior. The environment can shape behavior, and reinforcement can increase the likehood that an evernt will be repeated. Classical conditioning and operant conditioning is done to promote conditioning in human beings or animals) was developed mainly by B. F. Skinner. It has been promoted by people like Edward Thorndike, Tolman, Guthrie, and Hull. The behavior sciences deal with many topics too. The fields involve psychology, social neuroscience, and other traditions.

The Solomon's Temple has tons of parts to it back then. It was found in the Temple Mount or Mount Zion. It was first destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar II after the Siege of Jerusalem of 587 B.C. Some believed that the Temple continued an earlier Jebusite sanctuary predating the Israelite conquest of Jerusalem. The Temple house the Ark of the Covenant (that presented the presence of the God of Yisrael, YHVH. The dwelling place of God is called Shekinah in Hebrew). The Book of Samuel and the Book of Kings described the King Solomon's Temple. The Ark was placed in the Tabernacle tent. King David played the Ark in Israel's new capital of Jerusalem after he unified all of Israel. King Solomon wanted the aid of King Hiram of Tyre to give the quality materials and skilled craftsmen to construct the Temple. The inner room in the Temple is called the Holy of Holies or the Kodesh Hakodashim. The Ark has the Tablets of Stone placed in them (as found in 1 Kings 8:6-9). The Holy of Holies is the Inner House. It was 20 cubits in length, breadth, and height. Breadth is width from back in the day. Cedar from Lebanon floored the Temple. Its walls and floor was overlaid with gold. There were 2 cherubim of olive wood each 10 cubits high 1 Kings 6:16, 20, 21, 23-28) and each having outspread wings 10 cubits from tip to tip, so that, since they stood side by side, the wings touched the wall on either side and met in the center of the room. There was a two-leaved door between it and the Holy Place overlaid with gold (2 Chr. 4:22). The Hekhal is the Holy Place. Other major parts of the Temple are the Porch, Boaz and Jachin, the Chambers, the courts, and the brazen sea. Artifacts about ancient Israel have been found in near King Solomon's Temple as well.

Secret Society influence is all over the place. There is a bust of George Washington with a winged disk image along with a hexagram symbol on it. There are serpents surrounding the globe. The winged disk is used in Masonry and Rosicrucianism. According to Freemason Clymer Swinburne’s “The Rosicrucians and Their Teachings” on pg. 112, the winged globe relates to the perfected soul that made flight back to the source of its creation in the Elysian fields beyond. Some view the image of Nibiru as a cross. Dr. Simo Parpola, a researcher at the University of Helsinki, has made some suggestive findings on the matter, particularly concerning an analysis of the Sefirot. Dr. Parpola believed that the Sefirot have similarities to the Tree of Life of Assyria. A relief from the N.W. palace of Ashurnasirpal II (883-859 B.C.) showing the anointing of the Tree of life. Above the tree of life is the royal signet of the god Ashur. Ashur is shown as a man with a bow inside of a winged solar disk or a winged solar disk. This symbolism has been used in America. America celebrates its independence on July 4th (or 7+6=13. Washington and his 12 of his generals were Masons making up 13 human beings in total). When the
Declaration of Independence was signed thus giving birth to the new country, the sun was thirteen degrees into the sign of Cancer, and the ascendant was therefore, thirteen degrees into the sign of Scorpio. So, the number 13 is all over the U.S. even inthe Great Seal. Esoterics use America as trying to fulfill the old Ancient Quest (or trying to perfect man in a commonwealth of nations as Manly P. Hall admitted. Hall is of course a high level Freemason and a high level Illuminist knowing about the agenda of the esoterics). Hall support Sir Francis Bacon's goal of trying to create the New Atlantis in the North American continent.

By Timothy

Other News

Trifecta of Mass Murder Sets Stage for Attack on Syria


Trifecta of Mass Murder Sets Stage for Attack on Syria

  •   The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store

Kurt Nimmo
April 29, 2011
John McCain, Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham – described as Senate hawks by a timid corporate media – are demanding Obama call for the resignation of Syria’s leader, Bashar al-Assad.

According to this Senate Trifecta of mass murder, the engineered color revolution in Syria “has reached a decisive point” and now is the time to push al-Assad out of power and further destabilize the Arab Middle East.
“By following the path of [Qadhafi] and deploying military forces to crush peaceful demonstrations, al-Assad and those loyal to him have lost the legitimacy to remain in power in Syria,” the senators said in a joint statement. “We urge President Obama to state unequivocally — as he did in the case of Qadhafi and [Egyptian President Hosni] Mubarak — that it is time for Assad to go.”
McCain-Lieberman-Graham want sanctions and other “tangible diplomatic and economic measures” to pressure leaders of the al-Assad regime to stop the crackdown, according to Politico.
In other words, the senators are calling for sanctions on the Syrian people. Brutal medieval sanctions did not force Saddam Hussein to step down. It took two military invasions to get rid of him. Sanctions will not get rid of Gaddafi in Libya, either. Sanctions in the current context are merely a formality before the bombs begin to drop. Only a military invasion of Syria will force out al-Assad.
  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Earlier in the week, the Europeans began preparations. “France – together with the U.K., Germany, Spain and Italy – said Syrian ambassadors had been summoned to be made aware of the condemnation of the escalating violence against Syrian citizens,” reports the Wall Street Journal.
“We want to find an answer to these serious human-rights abuses at the European level,” said Chancellor Angela Merkel’s chief spokesman, Steffen Seibert. “Whether sanctions against Syrian leaders are possible will be reviewed. We would strongly support such sanctions,” he said.
The EU went further. A spokesman for Catherine Ashton, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs, said Wednesday the 27-nation globalist bloc was “considering all options” for responding to the situation in Syria. The EU is one of the international institutions “working together to exert pressure” on Syria’s regime, said Michael Mann, Ashton’s spokesman.
It follows a familiar pattern that began in Egypt. Globalist NGOs, the CIA, NED, Freedom House, and USAID work together to support and organize popular opposition to dictatorial rulers like Mubarak and al-Assad. A military attack on Egypt was not required like it now is in Libya and will soon be in Syria and Iran.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad)
The Trifecta of Mass Murder has issued a siren call of things to come. It is unlikely Bashar al-Assad and his generals will step down as easily as Mubarak and his cronies. If we can believe the corporate media, the Syrian security services have killed hundreds of people. The regime is determined to stay in power, same as Gaddafi.
Don’t be surprised if the EU and the neocons in the U.S. begin calling for a no-fly zone and military attacks on al-Assad’s government. The globalists are determined to push the “Arab Spring” to its logical and bloody conclusion in order to get results.

Royal Family Enforces Media Embargo Against Australia To Prevent Nazi Jokes



Royal Family Enforces Media Embargo Against Australia To Prevent Nazi Jokes

  •   The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store

Paul Joseph Watson
April 29, 2011
Shocker: Royal Family Enforces Media Embargo Against Australia To Prevent Nazi Jokes  290411top1
Still think the British Royal Family has no power and fulfils merely a ceremonial purpose? Think again. In order to prevent an Australian comedy show from making jokes about Prince Philip being a Nazi during the Royal Wedding, the Royals ordered broadcasters in Britain to enforce a media embargo that would have completely severed live coverage to Australia’s biggest broadcaster if they refused to cancel the satirical show.
After Prince Charles’ Clarence House found out that Australian broadcaster ABC planned to run a satirical commentary of the Royal Wedding alongside the regular feed, Charles demanded ABC cancel the show, and then ordered broadcast suppliers BBC, Associated Press, Sky and ITN to cut off the feed to Australia, a command which they instantly obeyed.
That’s right – the Royals have the power to enforce media embargoes between Britain and other major countries of the world. If this doesn’t indicate how much influence and power they still retain then nothing does.
The Royal Family threatened to deny Australia’s national broadcaster access to the Royal Wedding after they announced plans to run a satirical show called Chaser, which would have featured comedians providing light-hearted commentary over live pictures of the marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton.
Clarence House, the almost 200-year-old London royal residence which doubles as an office for the Prince of Wales and his son, Prince William, demanded the ABC cancel plans to use the controversial comedy group, the Chaser, as royal wedding commentators,” reports the Sydney Morning Herald.
They then contacted broadcast suppliers, including the host BBC, Associated Press Television News (APTN), Sky and ITN, to ensure the ABC would have no access to footage if it ignored the request.
Faced with the prospect of airing static for almost four hours tomorrow night, the ABC had no choice but to capitulate.
The Royals were apparently concerned about the fact that Chaser’s comedians would poke fun at Prince Philip for being a notorious racist and Nazi sympathizer during the big day. “We were only planning to use jokes that Prince Phillip has previously made in public, or at least the ones that don’t violate racial vilification laws,” wrote members of Chaser in a letter to the Queen.
ABC had negotiated access to run two feeds of the wedding, one featuring audio directly from the BBC, and another clean feed of just the video that would have allowed Chaser comedians to provide satirical commentary.
  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • FREE Extreme Emergency Kit with qualifying purchase!
When the Royals found out about ABC’s plan, they stipulated that the footage could not be used ”in any drama, comedy, satirical or similar entertainment program or content”. The the Prince of Wales’s press secretary, Patrick Harrison, then put pressure on broadcasters to refuse ABC access to the stream, reminding them of the “conditions” that accompanied their license to broadcast.
Associated Press television subsequently confirmed that, “the restrictions had been ”agreed between Clarence House, the private office of the Prince of Wales and [host broadcaster] the BBC.” In other words, the Royal Family ordered the BBC to cut off the live feed to ABC if they refused to cancel the show, and the BBC clicked their heels and obediently complied.
”In Australia we’re not used to these sorts of conditions being placed on the media and you can’t help but observe these restrictions are being placed on the media on behalf of a future head of state of Australia,” the ABC’s director of television, Kim Dalton, told the SMH.
The Chaser’s Julian Morrow said that the show was eventually cancelled because of “pressures….brought to bear from relatively high places.”
“We also know that the BBC and Clarence House … has been spooking other broadcasters in the background and making it very clear that they shouldn’t provide alternative footage,” added Morrow.
Even Australia’s Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd Kevin Rudd stepped in to comment that the BBC should “lighten up” and discover a sense of humor.
Every time we write an article about the Royal Family, a hardcore of deluded naysayers parrot the claim that the Royals have no power whatsoever and are merely ceremonial. I think we can firmly put that one to bed now that this episode illustrates how the Royal Family enjoys complete control over the broadcast policies of Britain’s publicly funded broadcaster, the BBC.

Illuminati Messages in Deus Ex

Fantastic Four Revisited

Killer twisters likely among largest, strongest

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Secret Malcolm X recording with FBI.flv

Financial Heist of the Century: Confiscating Libya's Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWF)

10 Reasons Why the World Hates Jesus


The Push for Privatization of Medicare and Medicaid Spells Disaster

Church of Scientology buys landmark Hollywood production studio


Church of Scientology buys landmark Hollywood production studio
April 27, 2011Print Version Source: London Telegraph

The 300,000 sq ft lot on Sunset Boulevard is currently home to KCET, the largest independent public television station in the United States.

It was used in the past to shoot films including "El Cid," starring Charlton Heston, and "The Hurricane," directed by John Ford.

The studio includes two sound stages and state-of-the-art post production, satellite and internet broadcasting facilities. The undisclosed asking price ran into millions of dollars. It has been valued at $14 million.

The organisation, founded in 1953 by science-fiction writer L Ron Hubbard, counts Hollywood stars Tom Cruise and John Travolta among its followers.

It already has production facilities and numerous sound stages on a 500-acre site outside Los Angeles.

It said the newly acquired Hollywood studio would become a "central media hub" for its network of thousands of centres around the world. It will be used to produce television programmes, short information films and internet content.

The studio's satellite uplink will be used to transmit video in high definition to centres worldwide, including footage of Scientology events.

In a statement the organisation said: "It is a perfect fit, in both size and location, for the expansion of the Church of Scientology's production of religious and social betterment audio-visual properties, and we welcomed the unexpected opportunity to acquire it." The struggling KCET station is planning to move to smaller premises.

The property is the longest continuously producing studio in Hollywood and has been in operation since 1912. It was formerly home to Monogram Pictures and Allied Artists.

Its recognised status as a historic and cultural monument protects it from being altered.

The Church of Scientology already owns dozens of properties in Los Angeles, including four on Hollywood Boulevard, and the studio is close to its headquarters in the city.

Tornadoes devastate the southern U.S.

King Solomon

House May Vote on Taxpayer-Funding of Abortion Ban Next Week

Ancient Eurasian Peoples

China unveils rival to International Space Station

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Super Rich See Federal Taxes Drop Dramatically

Miss America Sexually Molested by TSA

The New Era of Challenges and Life

Economics are real. President John F. Kennedy according to Gibson’s research wanted to have economic development and economic planning in the Third World with nationalism. John F. Kennedy’s June 6, 1963 was when he advocated civil rights legislation. There is legitimate criticism toward JFK that he was rather lukewarm in fighting against reactionaries in the South that wanted to deprive human beings of their rights. JFK ordered U.S. Marshals to protect Freedom Riders in Alabama in 61, called in the National Guard to ensure Jim Meredith’s enrollment at Old Miss in 62. By 1963, JFK began to support more radical action. . JFK wanted to "split the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds." He fired Director of CIA Allen dulls, Deputy Richard Bissell and others and put them under the Joint chiefs jurisdiction. He also had bobby use the FBI to keep the Miami CIA people from running boat attacks inCuban waters. JFK was President for less than 3 years. He dealt with the steel companies when they increased the price of steel. He signed the Test Ban Treaty which saved our atmosphere. He put the civil rights bill in congress and donated all his salary to charity. No President has ever done that. President John F. Kennedy experienced a long sustained economic growth during his Presidency. Some believed that he wanted a silver backed currency independent of the private owned FED and of the banks. It is true that President Kennedy authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to issue U.S. Treasury silver certificates and he was the last President to issue freely circulating United States Notes or Greenbacks. After Kennedy’s assassination, Lyndon Johnson allowed the FED to have Federal Reserve Notes without being redeemed in silver (to replace the U.S. Notes). This policy was the beginning of the end of the Greenbacks. 1971 was one year in economic history that people can’t forget. From 1945 to 1971, America had most of the world’s gold reserves, a large industrial base, and a surplus of dollars backed by gold. The U.S. could afford to spend moneys to Germany, Japan, etc. to allow those nations to grow economically from the 1950’s to the 1960’s. There was stability when the economies of Asia and Western Europe started to flourish as a counter to communism. This caused an advantage to America. Vietnam came. By the late 1960’s, the Vietnam War led to a drain of U.S. gold reserves.  America was spending more than it had in its gold reserves. The drain was in huge level by 1968 when stagflation became. As foreign central banks holding dollars feared the US deficits would make their dollars worthless, and preferred real gold instead. Let’s be clear. The Bretton Woods Agreement form 1944 fixed all exchange rates that allowed the dollar to be anchored by gold (it didn’t allow U.S. currency to have an explicit gold standard financially). The agreement wasn’t perfect, but it limited speculators from creating massive bubbles in the economy. The Bretton Woods gold situation worked, because few countries converted their dollars into gold. Richard Nixon in August of 1971 broke with the Bretton Woods agreement. Nixon was inspired to take this route as early as 1968 by the economist Milton Friedman. He didn’t want dollars to redeem with gold. He wanted the dollar to be fixed not on an ounce of gold, but on the printing press of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve. The problem was that the dollar was based on fiat currency and fractional reserve currency. This new dollarism policy (or floating exchange rates since 1971) was worse than the Bretton Woods gold standard policy since multinational corporations can just devalue national currencies in smaller nations by selling them short on the international market. This caused financial markets to be deregulated, more controls lifted, offshore banking, and unregulated hedge funds (plus financial derivatives to exist). Washington and New York banks caused this to occur. Debt increased as well. Because all key commodities, above all, oil, were traded globally in dollars, demand for dollars would continue, even if the US created more dollars than its own economy justified. The overreliance on the dollar by some nations existed to inflate their economics. There was an economic crisis in Germany, Japan, and the world by 1973. In the years between 1945 and 1965, total supply of dollars grew a total of only some 55%. Those were the golden years of low inflation and stable growth. After Nixon's break with gold, dollars expanded by more than 2,000% between 1970 and 2001! The dollar is the mostly global reserve currency. The Euro exists now too. The dollar hegemony has caused many problems indeed that we experience today in 2011. Gold is difficult to work in a domestic standard since gold can fluctuate rapidly, there is not enough gold in the world to handle trade, and this policy can drain U.S. gold reserves.

The Renaissance has a strong occult connection to it. The Renaissance means rebirth. The Renaissance in many instances tried to merge the classical/hermetic views of the Greco-Roman world and merge with the Romanism that dominated Europe in that era. The Renaissance promoted humanism as opposed to the Middle Age culture. The Renaissance was like the official end of the medieval period inside of the European continent. The metaphysical views from the classical times were known or embraced by Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and Marsilio Finco of the Platonic Academy in Florence. That is why Ficino was a scholar, priest, and a magician. Ficino merged Platonic literature and the hermetic arts (of astrology, alchemy, and magic) with religious views to create a pseudo Christian form of Neo-Platonism. Neo Platonism tried to revive the views of Plato and use magic as well. Even Aristotle formed a form of the scientific method that was based upon observation rather than faith. While Palot, dealt with religious or metaphysical questions. Aristotle’s reliance of human achievement influenced the Enlightenment period or the Age of Reason (some wanted Deism). Deism is the belief of one God creating the Universe and then having no interference in it afterward (allowing Nature and man to do what they want basically). The Kabbalah was another intricate part of the Renaissance. by 1493, the works of Pico della Mirandola, the famous student of Marsillo Ficino, founder of the neo-Platonic Academy of Florence, had captivated Pope Sixtus IV who mainstreamed the Cabala as orthodox doctrine. Even Pope Sixtus IV (who was Pope from 1471-1484) had translated 50 Cabalistic books into Latin. Pico and Reuchlin wanted a Christian version of the Cabala. Renaissance Gnostic, Hermeticist and Cabalist, Pico della Mirandola ". . .conceived of Hermes and Plato as aids to persuading those to religion who would not accept Scripture alone." Pico della Mirandola decided that the three highest Sefiroth—Kether, representing the Supreme Diadem, Hokmah, wisdom, and Binah, understanding—could be equated with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. The Kabbalah is an old heresy that believes that an impersonal deity called Ein Sof created the Universe via its emanations. The first ray of light to them or the Kabbalah is called adam kadmon.  To this day, Cabalists, Freemasonry, the Jesuits, and other infiltrators try to go into the Church to make the Church more New Age. James Webb’s “The Occult Underground” exposes the truth that occult traditions were common in the Renaissance period. The same Black Nobility and wealthy Medici family funded leading Cabalists like Marsilio Ficino, Pico della Mirandola, John Reuchlin and Cornelius Agrippa. A huge influence on the occult philosophy of Cornelius Agrippa was the treatise, De Verbo Mirifico by Johann Reuchlin, the greatest German proponent of Hebrew studies of the early 16th Century. Agrippa in turn influenced western magic more than any figure of his age, including his contemporary, Paracelsus. Francesco Giorgi was a famous person in this age as well. 4 Popes were Medicis. Pico wanted to use Hermes and Plato as means to discover religion without Scripture alone.  Pope Urban VIII was a firm believer in astrology. One ploy of the so-called “Christian Cabalists” of the Renaissance was to illustrate the Trinitarian Godhead using the five upper sephiroth on the Cabalistic Tree of Life, which forms a pentagram.  By inserting the Hebrew letter Shin, which stands for Shekinah, the female Holy Spirit, into the Tetragrammaton (YHVH), they produced YHShVH or Jesus, who they claimed was the “divine androgyne.” Thus, they deceptively reasoned, the Cabalistic view of the androgynous Godhead could be used by the Catholic hierarchy to prove the divinity of Jesus Christ to those who would not accept Scripture. Leonardo da Vinci’s “Vitruvian Man” is a figure that is a recreation of the Kabbalah tree of life and the Gnostic androgynous godhead figure. The image is found in the opening chapters of the Da Vinci Code. The Virtuvian Man was a drawing made by da Vinci in ca. 1487. The image was surrounding a circle and a square. Da Vinci wanted to define the human body into proportions in a mathematical or geometric fashion. Other artists and organizations have recreated the Vitruvian Man image. The Renaissance spread into Europe with Cabalists like Dr. John Dee.

Pro-abortion violence rears its ugly head again with Rachel Maddow not reporting on it at all. Near Easter, pro-abortion activists vandalized and desecrated a Christian pro-life display. This was created by students at Clarion University that was put up at their Pennsylvania campus. The Display was called the Cemetery of the Innocents. The crosses represent the 53 million unborn children that have been killed in abortion since Roe v. Wade came about in 1973. Roe allowed almost unlimited abortions from 1973 on. Some of the pro-abortion extremists turned the crosses upside down to form satanic symbols. They dripped fake flood over many of the cross. They placed many of the crosses in a pile. The abortion advocate then wrote the word “Pro-Choice” in the “blood” on the sidewalk in front of the sign the pro-life students put in front of their display to explain its meaning. These pro-abortion extremist are sick liars. Kristan Hawkins is the director of the Students for Life in America. He described the desecration to Hawkins said the following truthful, accurate words about the demented incident: “…In a breathtaking public display of anti-Christian and anti-Life motivations, 350 crosses were pulled up and re-inserted in inverted fashion, a well-known anti-Christian symbol,” she explained. “Additionally, red paint was splattered on crosses and signs. Even eerier was the mock bloody footprints of an infant painted in front of the display.” “Vandalism of pro-life displays on campus is not uncommon, but this incident takes pro-choice vandalism on campus to a whole new level,” Hawkins continued. “It is revolting to think that anyone would desecrate a display in this way, most especially with red paint to imitate blood. Clarion University must take a strong stand against this disgusting, intolerant, and hate-filled act.” Clarion Students for Life did its annual Life Week (during last week) and each year the pro-life group organizes a Cemetery of the Innocents display in the middle of the campus. They have used 350 crosses and 2 signs explaining that each cross represents 10 children abortion every day. Hawkins mentions that the vandalism is nothing new. She said that each year Clarion SFL has some sort of vandalism. This vandalism includes crosses being knocked over. Some view these actions as anti-Life and anti-Christian since the inverted cross carries anti-Christian and anti-religious sentiments). This vandalism comes 1 month after vandals burglarized and virtually destroyed a pregnancy center in the South Bronx. These pro-abortion cowards are running scared and truth has them on the run. Chris Slattery, founder and president of Expectant Mother Care-EMC FrontLine Pregnancy Centers emailed about the incident. “Our main office in the South Bronx was burglarized again.  This is the second time this has happened in the past 12 months,” he said. “They broke into our facility through the second story window, stole over $5,000 worth of equipment, and virtually destroyed the office.” Slaterry have shown pictures to prove that property and possessions at the center were stolen or damaged. The vandals ripped up wooden planks from the floor and tossed them across the center. “The rampage of these heartless criminals shattered windows, stole all of our audio visual equipment, destroyed displays and supplies, tore up the ceiling, doors, and floor,” he said. “They even broke into our supply closet and stole our Pampers.” These criminals are the same hypocrites claiming to embrace tolerance, yet they have no tolerance for the peaceful expression of Pro-Life thought. The Rhodes Scholar Rachel Maddow won’t report on this news at all.

Dr. Cathy Burns wrote about Tom Horn’s research. She found that Tom claims that all of his Scriptural quotations are from the KJV, but some in his 2012 book are found in the NIV version. Horn claimed that the descendants of Lamech attacked America in 9/11. Lamech is a descendant of Cain and all descendants of Cain’s lineage were gone by the Flood, so Lamech’s descendants can’t possibly attack America in the USA. Horn believes that Apollo, Nimrod, and Osiris are the same being. Yet, Apollo and Osiris are mythological gods. Nimrod is from the son of Cush being a leader in the OT days. Nimrod according to Horn was a Nephilim when Nimrod was the great-grandson of Noah. Horn believes that Horn was a fallen angel, but he asks if Apollo-Osiris can rise from a hidden tomb at Giza. Angels don’t die, so a fallen angel can’t rise from the tomb. There is no conclusive evidence that Goliath was a part-human/part fallen angel being as Horn claims. He trusts the Book of Jasher that promotes many heresies indeed. These claims made by Tom Horn deal with some Christians being deceived in embracing another date-setting 2012 fiasco. The truth is that we don’t know exactly the time and the date of the coming of the Son of God on Earth. We should make signs known to people and research prophetic information. Yet, we can’t get caught up in trying to date set the end of the ages in 2012 or promote hysteria in the world. For if the world doesn’t end in 2012, and then the people promoting such a claim lose credibility in their words.

Sociology definitely studies human social behavior. There are tons of definitions and concepts. There is home modification (this is the adaptation and or renovation of the living environment need to increase ease of use, safety, security, and independence). There is local, state, federal, and volunteer program that provide special grants, loans, and other assistance for home remodeling, repair, and modification. August Comte (1798-1857) was a modern innovator in the study of sociology. Emile Durkheim developed positivism as a way to create social research. Positivism is about using the scientific method to understand how physical and human events happen. Ancient Greece and even the present age have used the positivist approach. Positivism believes that human sense, experience, and positive verification can cause humans to understand real knowledge. Positivists want to test scientific knowledge. Empiricism is easily the theory that only views sensory experience not rationalism that knowledge can be achieved among the human race. Hegel criticized positivism as too mechanical, deterministic, and uncritical. Hegel wanted experiences to be critiqued or evaluated not just documented. Sociology can branch into education, the environment, economics, and other topics. In the 21st century, of course, sociology deals heavily in family, gender, and sexuality.

By Timothy

Dragging Malcolm X to Obamaland

A Cop Beat a Woman in an Atlanta IHOP.

Vaccine Law

Robert George and Arthur Caplan Debate Dangers of Eugenics

More Advice in late April of 2011

edit.."No REAL MAN" at the helm to mitigate it.By real man I mean a man with intelligence that can protect his women with his mind, as well as his strength. One without the other may be good enough for whites..but black men are going to have to be better than that if we are to take our rightful place. Just how it is..Just like I have to be smarter than white people I work with to get respect and to maintain, we have to be smarter in our personal lives, and stronger as well, in every way, in order to maintain..At least for the foreseeable future. That is reality.



I would question the whole corporate logic which governs the university, and which undermines real education. In fact, why should people have to pay to learn--or to go into such a morass of debt that they become prisoners of corporate banking interests for many years of their lives.
Real education--which schools need to commit themselves to--are valuable not only in terms of the intellectual and social growth of the individual student, but also for the formation of an highly developed citizenry enabled for lives of freedom and self-determination.
This should be the right of every citizen, every human being of whatever race,color, creed or gender



culture56 wrote:
. That's. A Myth ....I am only ResponsIble for Myself I think Whites use that To find Something t0 Attack blacks..
The interesting thing is that many whites are the ones who are always blaming others for THEIR troubles, despite the fact that compared to other non-white groups they're relatively privileged.
Many whites blame blacks, Mexicans, Muslims,Jews, foreigners or the poor for their bad breaks in life.
What's interesting is that whites are do suffer injustice, but mainly from OTHER WHITES who belong to the privileged classes.
But instead of seeing reality for what it is, they blame people even more disadvantaged than themselves. The social backwardness of the USA is largely due to this white myopia.



One of the great things about becoming educated is that you do become SUPERIOR to fools and racists like OhREally. And by virtue of your moral and intellectual superiority, you become the MASTER.
Solely by virtue of the qualities of your mind and the contents of your character. And this really gets under the skin of the white racists.
I think that whatever his shortcomings (and there are quite few) one the reasons that Barack Obama is so hated in parts of white America is because he's superior to those who hate him, when (according to the mythology of race) he ought to be inferior.
And yet that is not the main reason (even if it make one's mouth water) that we ought to seek the best education possible. Even if you're a janitor you should seek to become educated (not just academically trained) because education enables for a life of FREEDOM.
Have any of you ever read the LIFE AND TIMES OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS, or maybe his NARRATIVE? You may recall that the slaveowner himself stated that if a slave learns to read and to think, there would be no holding him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave.
Well contemporary forms of injustice also depend upon popular ignorance. Whoever is WILLINGLY ignorant, willingly undeveloped in his or her mental development, is complicit in his own enslavement.
Classical philosophers in antiquity used to argue that the "rational principle" of the soul is the part of the human being which is MOST HUMAN, and which makes him or her akin to the gods.
Cultivate that intellectual principle, sisters and brothers. Lay claim to your FULL HUMANITY. And let the racist rot away as decayed relics of the past.
Claim your full rights, and nothing less.



Top Mexican Drug Lord: I Trafficked Cocaine For The U.S. Government



Top Mexican Drug Lord: I Trafficked Cocaine For The U.S. Government

  • The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store
Jesus Vicente Zambada Niebla was “logistical coordinator” for narco-gang behind purchase of CIA torture jet that wrecked with four tons of cocaine
Top Mexican Drug Lord: I Trafficked Cocaine For The U.S. Government 270411top
Paul Joseph Watson
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
The “logistical coordinator” for a top Mexican drug-trafficking gang that was responsible for purchasing the CIA torture jet that crashed with four tons on cocaine on board back in 2007 has told the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago that he has been working as a U.S. government asset for years.
Jesus Vicente Zambada Niebla is the son of Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada Garcia, one of the top kingpins of the Sinaloa drug-trafficking organization. Niebla was arrested in Mexico in March 2009 and extradited to the United States to stand trial last February.
“The indictment pending against Zambada Niebla claims he served as the “logistical coordinator” for the “cartel,” helping to oversee an operation that imported into the U.S. “multi-ton quantities of cocaine … using various means, including but not limited to, Boeing 747 cargo aircraft, private aircraft … buses, rail cars, tractor trailers, and automobiles,” writes Narcosphere’s Bill Conroy.
In a two page court pleading filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago, Niebla claims that he was working on behalf and with the authority of, “The U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”); and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”); and the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”),” since January 1, 2004.
Niebla is also connected to the Gulfstream II jet that wrecked with four tons of cocaine on board on September 24, 2007. European investigators linked the plane’s tail number, N987SA, to past CIA “rendition” operations. The bill of sale for the Gulfstream jet, sold weeks before it crashed, listed the name of Greg Smith, a pilot who had previously worked for the FBI, DEA and CIA.
The plane was purchased by Niebla’s Sinaloa drug-trafficking organization through a syndicate of Colombian drug-traffickers that included a CIA asset named Nelson Urrego, according to another undercover CIA operative, Baruch Vega, who was involved in the deal.

Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (AD)
“The Gulfstream II jet, according to Mexican authorities, was among a number of aircraft acquired by the Sinaloa drug organization via an elaborate money laundering scheme involving a chain of Mexican casa de cambios (currency exchange houses) overseen by alleged Sinaloa organization operative Pedro Alfonso Alatorre Damy, according to Mexican government and U.S. media reports,” writes Conroy.
Sinaloa bought the jet by wiring money through the U.S. banking giant Wachovia, now a subsidiary of Wells Fargo. “In total, nearly $13 million dollars went through correspondent bank accounts at Wachovia for the purchase of aircraft to be used in the illegal narcotics trade. From these aircraft, more than 20,000 kilograms of cocaine were seized,” states Wachovia’s deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice. Wachovia was forced to pay a penalty of around $160 million dollars for allowing the money to be laundered through its correspondent bank accounts.
“So, the criminal cases pending against alleged Colombian narco-trafficker Urrego, accused money-launderer Damy and Sinaloa organization logistics chief Zambada Niebla all appear to connect through the Gulfstream II cocaine jet at some level,” summarizes Conroy.
Another private aircraft that was full of cocaine crashed in New Mexico on Sunday morning, but the plane has yet to be identified.
In addition to smuggling narcotics into the United States, Niebla is also accused of obtaining weapons from the U.S. with the intent to use them to cause violence in Mexico City, leading to the murders of several innocent people. Despite the fact that the Obama administration has cited the flow of guns from the U.S. into Mexico as an excuse with which to attack the second amendment rights of Americans, it was recently revealed that the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives deliberately allowed guns to be smuggled from the U.S. into the hands of Mexican drug lords under “Operation Fast and Furious”. President Obama later denied that he had any knowledge of the program.
Niebla’s assertion that he smuggled drugs from Mexico into the United States while working for the U.S. government adds further weight to the already voluminous body of evidence that confirms the CIA and U.S. banking giants are the top players in a global drug trade worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year, information made public by the likes of Gary Webb, who it was claimed committed suicide in 2004 despite the fact that he was found with two gunshot wounds to the head and after Webb himself had complained of death threats and “government people” stalking his home.
For more background information on the story, be sure to read Bill Conroy’s excellent article over at Narco News entitled Mexican Narco-Trafficker’s Revelation Exposes Drug War’s Duplicity.

The Myth of Pro-Life Violence

The Myth of Pro-Life Violence

Note by Me: I don't agree with the JBS on every issue, but they are right on this one.

By Timothy

The President shows his Original Birth Certificate

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Greek Fraternities and Freemasonry Part 3

The Vatican/Jesuits and the NWO


Harry Connick, Sr.: Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor in JFK Assassination and Cover-up

Posted by EJP on Apr 21st, 2011

The following is from Simon to EJP:

user posted image
Jesuit Superior General Ignatius Loyola with His Immoral Theologians Justifying Regicide, 1540s

Harry Connick, Sr. — District Attorney of New Orleans (1973-2003), Jim Garrison’s successor

Harry Connick, Sr. was the successor to Jim Garrison, becoming the New Orleans DA in 1973. He was an Irish Roman Catholic who was trained by the Jesuits at Loyola University [New Orleans---EJP]. His son, a famous singer, was trained by the Jesuits at the Jesuit High School in New Orleans. He also performed recitals at Loyola University.

At the time of Garrison’s investigation, Connick was an assistant US attorney. During the Shaw trial, he sat in the courtroom every day, serving as a representative of the federal government against Garrison. He represented FBI agents interviewed in Garrison’s office. He escorted Pierre Finck, the government’s medical witness (and a covert operative for US Intelligence, who had participated in other government/military cover-ups), into the courtroom. During his investigation, Jim Garrison was attacked by the mainstream media, local politicians, the federal government, elements of the local police, and the intelligence community. He realized that he was being opposed by a very powerful force. It is clear that Connick was an agent of that force.

One of Connick’s personal investigators was a former police officer named Gary Raymond. After he became DA, he called Raymond in and presented him with all files detailing the Grand Jury testimony of Garrison’s witnesses. Connick ordered Raymond to destroy the files. Raymond objected, seeing them as historical documents. Connick, however, insisted: “Burn this sonofabitch and burn it today!”

The honest Raymond did not burn the files as ordered. Instead, he kept them for many years and passed them onto his friend Richard Angelico, a WSDU reporter, when interest in the Kennedy assassination was becoming more widespread. WSDU sent them to Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) in Washington, and broadcast a news report that exposed Connick’s attempt to destroy the files. Connick charged and tried both Raymond and Angelico, and attempted to pry the documents out of the Justice Department’s hands. An apparently honest Justice Department held onto the files, while Connick engaged in a legal battle with them that lasted over a year long.

Connick was one of the sources used by [Italian-American Roman Catholic---EJP] Vincent Bugliosi in Reclaiming History. He tells Bugliosi that Garrison was known in the legal community as a “four flusher” who often could not prove his charges. This is flatly untrue. Garrison had reversed his predecessor’s losing record. Connick also told Bugliosi that Oliver Stone never asked him about the Grand Jury testimony files. However, this is ridiculously misleading: at the time Stone interviewed Connick, the existence of these files was not yet declassified. A film director would have no reason to ask Connick about these files.

Why did Connick involve himself in Garrison’s opposition so heavily?

Why did Connick care so much about destroying the Grand Jury testimony, going so far as to legally battle the Justice Department?

Why did Connick care so much about destroying the reputation of the Garrison investigation, going so far as to lie to Vincent Bugliosi?

He was a staunch Roman Catholic and was trained at a private Jesuit college. However, his actions further prove that his loyalties were not with the USA or the common good, but with the Vatican.

After Gary Raymond left the District Attorney’s office, Connick asked him to review a case that involved a local Roman Catholic priest who was suspected of being a pedophile. Raymond concluded, based on the material, that the priest was guilty and advised Connick to prosecute him. Connick refused. Raymond, however, was not satisfied. He found one of the boys that had been molested by the priest. The boy was afraid to testify, as the priest had threatened to kill him if he did. Raymond created an affidavit and sent it to Connick. Even with this new evidence, Connick did not prosecute or even investigate the priest. Raymond demanded answers from Connick, who flatly stated that as long as he was in office, the priest would not be prosecuted. The priest, Father Dino Cinel, was later exposed. This was a major scandal that shook the Church.

Harry Connick (Irish Roman Catholic, Jesuit-trained) was loyal to the Roman Catholic Church. This is the only sensible explanation as to why he refused to prosecute a pedophile priest.

So, a Jesuit-trained Vatican loyalist was heavily involved in the opposition to Garrison’s investigation and attempted to destroy the Grand Jury testimony from the investigation. Later, he became a lying source for a book attempting to discredit “conspiracy theories” surrounding the assassination.

Yet more proof of Rome’s involvement in the assassination of America’s thirty-fifth president.



user posted image
US Supreme Court Justices: Six of them Roman Catholics, 2011

Stephen, another Adviser to EJP, adds:


Don’t know if you’re aware but the Supreme Court’s Five Roman Catholic justices just formed the majority in an awful decision exonerating Connick in a case where his office knowingly sent an innocent man to death row.

My dad read the opinions – awful!

With all respect Sir, you`re wrong with one aspect, if you allow me to say so; it was in fact The swiss Inquisition and not spanish. In Spain and Italy no women were burned (latin lovers, hey). " Swiss Jesuits wrote The Malleus Maleficarum: Inquisitoris Heinrich Kramer and Inquisitoris Jacobus Sprenger. And this book called The Witch`s Hammer was the manual on torture and burning women. The Swiss did it, this is why the Pope`s guard are still . . .yes, exactly. The first woman burned was in Switzerland and so was the last (Anna Maria Göldin). The Vatican and Switzerland were also in the ODESSA organisation, and they financed Adolf Hitler, etc. etc. Yours Sincerely: Sean Hross.At the end of the day the revived Templars being the Knights of the Virgin Mary IHS (Los Alumbrados) stem from whats now Spain but originally the area known as the Kingdom of Aragon. So whilst the Templars have great history from Switzerland after the Pope's Crusades once they were destroyed as a whole the small group allowed to go to Aragon is where we should now focus upon as this became what we have today the wicked Jesuit Order and if you look in old dictionaries you'll see the definition of Jesuit was 'a clever person who deceives the people'. Interesting choice of words when you understand that the Templars created the commercial system of today which funny enough is controlled from Berne, Switzerland by the Universal Postal Union which I believe is controlled by the Crown which has been held by the Knights of Malta since the 14th Century destruction of its last own since 1215 which was the Knights Templar after King John of England bought in the Magna Carta which caused the monarchs of this nation to loss all power over the Kingdom and Crown. So whilst the supposed 'Greatest Merchants on Earth' have covertly controlled the Crown it is from here where the control over the planet has taken place by proxy from Borgo Santo Spirito and at one time Villa Farnese in Luzio, Italy.

May I remind you that although the Swiss Guard guards over the Pope they are soon dropped if any real trouble occurs and they replace them with the Knights of Malta. Switzerland I believe is old news and that we should focus more so on the City of London which as you know its from my shores that the Templar system was taken and especially Scotland. You may like to study up on the House of Keswick who are a controller of HSBC as you should know closely knitted together with the British East India Company.

Nice information though I enjoyed your worked what I've watched until I had to go out. Remember that IHS logo is important and yes it stems from Constantine but his was IHSV which the Sacred Military Constantine Order of St George controlled by the House of Bourbon's use. The Jesuits use the IHS like the Templars and I don't believe its just to hide the conquering 'V' and that it is the Templar logo as they are the revived Templars. The same Templars who had to hide their South American reductions wealth in so-called Protestant Rothschild banks after 1773. Remembering on that England has been controlled by the House of Pallavicini and the lights of the Perci, Howard and Powell families all loyal to the Pope.

IHS means Isis, Horus and Seth.

Yes that correct although Alexander Hislop wrote that it was Isis Horus and Seb. Regardless in the more modern times its been called In Hoc Signo. It all goes back to Egypt as you'll see the hidden masters of the Vatican and Jesuit Order are the Ptolemaic bloodlines who love to show off their birth certificates which are the Obelisks of Rome which originated in Egypt. I especially like to focus on the House of Aldobrandini bought into the fold from Persia and we all know the roots of Persia in all this especially the Knights Templar AND the Jesuit Order with Loyola's connections to the Hashashiyyins.

I think we agree with one another, Sir; the Vatican with their Jesuits are evil. According my studies the Jesuits are the pharaonic Priests of Amun. I suppose you know, that the Yale Skull and Bones are the leftovers of chief Geronimo. I have to fulfill my family duties now, but I`ll be back to you tomorrow. Revolutionary

Well I think you need to go back to the Papal Nobility roots of the Jesuit Order such as the Farnese family and you'll get more idea into the Ptolemaic Egyptian connection. I believe the Jesuits are the Priesthood of Kronos where as the Catholic Church is more the Priesthood of Zeus to son of Kronos. So basically we're going from the Saturn controlled Roman Empire to the Jupiter controlled Vatican. Remember on that when the Pope is using his authority in person you'll see him through the symbol of Cosmos which is the two fingers straight up. These fingers are of both Zeus and Kronos and you'll notice that Krono is the tallest finger and thee God of the Gods. The Skull and Bones is simply the U.S. version of Chapter 322 from Bavaria and we all know about the origins of the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati covertly controls and created by Jesuits. If I remember correctly Adam Weishaupt died a Catholic as do many of these sheep dipper deceivers when it comes to death we see their true loyalties. So we have Skull & Bones doing rituals of kissing the slippered foot of the Pope. Skull & Bones is tied to the Russell Trust which again is Scottish Templarism aka Jesuitism. You might find it interesting to study into the roots of David Cameron who's tied to the Crooked Nose Clan and who's wife Samantha is the Daughter of the wife of an Astor and grand daughter is I recall of one of the Chairman's of Reuters. You know that British Intelligence news outlet which supplys all the news with Associate Press another British Intelligence outlet . These two together supply all of the repeating propaganda for the Knights of Malta. Remembering that both Rupert Murdoch (MI6) and Ted Turner (CIA) are both Knights of Malta and run Fox News and Cable News Network respectively.
-Craig Oxley


German Adviser Andreas Gives His Views on the CIA’s KGB Officer Anatoli Golitsyn

Posted by EJP on Apr 18th, 2011

Dear Andreas,

I shall post our dialogue, although I do not agree with your conclusion. Since we agree that both the CIA and KGB worked together (as did its surrogates, the West German BND and the East German SSD) during the entire Cold War Hoax, I shall post this. Others who read may come up with some further facts leading one of us to change our conclusion. As you know, I welcome all correction set forth in a factual, cogent way as you have done that I may reconsider certain conclusions.

Both positions need to be reviewed.

Lord bless,

Brother Eric


Dear Eric:

Please don’t post it if I cannot win you over to my point of view by my below mentioned answer.

What would be the point of launching wrong information on matters like these.

I certainly don’t want to whitewash Golitysn if he was/is the man you say he is.

I took your core arguments seriously and think they are flawed.

I know you are somebody who cherishes only the better argument. If I can’t convince you and you give me your reasons, I won’t be able to convince myself any more. And vice-versa.

So please listen to my objections.


Peter Wright: Any retired MI5 Assistant Director (!) is no truth-worthy source.


You write:

“Golitsin was given the most secret files of the CIA by Angleton and the most secret files of the British MI5 by Roger Hollis according to ex-MI5 officer, Peter Wright. This proves the collusion at the very top of the CIA, KGB and MI5/MI6”

Of course it proves the collusion at the top level. But as I have said:

Had this operation been for real, it would never have been nor needed to have been transacted in broad daylight – so sloppy, so traceable, that it was just a question of time until somebody discovered the files were missing. A long time – “maybe as long as three years” had passed by then. Don’t you think Angleton could at least retrieved them quietly long before without before?!

My conclusion continues reasonable to me: this charade was a decoy intended to frame Golitsyn for the ongoing killings and to rob the remaining loyal US and GB operatives of their confidence, making them leave Western intelligence services.


Your argument:

“Golitsin’s truthful work on GP [GP = Glasnost/Perestroika ?] further confuses the seeker in seeking to substantiate Golitsin’s guilt or innocence as a Soviet spy or a real ‘defector’.”

My response:

This would only to apply to those very few of us who could judge his assertions to be “truthful” – those who knew already that the end of the Cold War was as fake as the whole Cold War in itself. A tiny group of people.

Moreover in 1995 the Golitsyn story was dead cold.

Ergo: Why would they bother to launch The Perestroika Deception to convince a bunch of people whose “conspirary knowledge” made them cases beyond any “retrieval” in the first place, and for whom this Golitsyn question was a comparatively little piece in the whole picture, one more detail only?


In your quotation from his book on VAIII, p. 798, Peter Wright discredited Golitsyn making him look like a nitwit who didn’t give any information on KGB moles (see quotation VAIII, p. 798.).

But according to your argument, that’s exactly what Golitsyn’s task would have been: “Golitsin was the real deal – aided by the CIA to completely purge the KGB of real Russian patriots.”

And why would anybody have trusted him if he hadn’t given Western Intelligence anything substantial? That would have made him suspicious right away, wouldn’t it?


a. Opus Dei member of the Knights of Malta, William Colby: was he acting on his own – against Opus Dei?! Maybe he had grown a conscience? Yes, that’s possible, ok.

b. How do we know for sure the reasons for the murder of Eric Timm and Desmond Fitzgerald? It seems we have to believe Anthony Cave Brown. But even if we can trust him (I believe your judgement on his work “C”), he could have been mistaken on this one. Nobody knows everything. Happens all the time that we got something wrong.

But: They having been murdered at least provides both of them with some credibility. They may have opposed Angleton for having discovered one/some of the hundreds and thousands treasonous acts this demon committed, and assuming Angleton was a traitor, they wrongfully suspected Golitsyn to be one too for the very fact that Angleton vouched for his authenticity and defended him.


And finally Yuri Nosenko: is there any real prof to settle the question about where his loyalties lied. The best argument brings up is his being tortured. But this doesn’t prove anything if you send a strong and dedicated man. Maybe a Coadjutor. My point being: This whole Nosenko/Golitsyn controversy (and wasn’t there involved defector named “Fedora”?) created an embroilment of ultimately inconclusive data.


There remain the “good points” in my original paper.

Sincerely yours


P.S.: If I haven’t convinced you still, DON’T POST MY PAPER!


Dear Andreas,

I will post it, but I must disagree.

Anatoli M. Golitsyn was most assuredly the link between the Order’s Soviet KGB with the Order’s CIA via Knight of Malta James Angelton and Jesuit Fordham University-trained Knight of Malta Raymond Rocca. Golitsyn was given the most secret files of the CIA by Angleton and the most secret files of the British MI5 by Roger Hollis according to ex-MI5 officer, Peter Wright. This proves the collusion at the very top of the CIA, KGB and MI5/MI6—all subject to the Jesuit Papacy. Golitsyn’s truthful work on “Glasnost Perestroika” further confuses the seeker in attempting to substantiate Golitsin’s guilt as a Soviet spy or innocence as a real “defector.”

CIA officers Eric Timm and Desmond Fitzgerald were both murdered for openly opposing Angleton’s collusion with Golitsyn. See page 797 of VAIII quoting Treason in the Blood by Anthony Cave Brown.

Golitsyn lied about Yuri Nosenko stating he was a plant into the CIA, when in fact, Nosenko was a real “defector.” Yuri in his own mind believed there was a real Cold War between the US and USSR, they supposedly being mortal enemies—a bold-faced lie! After being tortured for three and one-half years by Angleton, Nosenko was found to be a real defector and went to work for the CIA. Golitsin was protected by JFK assassin, brother Knight of Malta William F. Buckley, Jr., he claiming that Golitsin was not the “mole” within the CIA, Buckley knowing full-well it was Angleton who was the liaison between CIA and KGB by way of his absolute control of CIA Counterintelligence.

CIA Director William Colby later fired Angleton for which Colby was later “killed in a hunting accident.” All opposing Angleton were either driven from power in the CIA or were killed.

Golitsyn was the real deal—aided by the CIA to completely purge the KGB of real Russian patriots seeking to overthrow the Order’s Soviet Government born and built by the Pope’s International White Power Structure centered in London and Washington subject to Rome!

Let us always remember the Order has an open-but-false policy and a secret-but-true policy. Concerning Golitsyn, the open policy was to treat him as a real defector when in fact he was not. He was used to purge the KGB of CIA Russian patriots as well as to drive American patriots out of the CIA! Wonderful! Though several of Golitsyn’s warnings were true in his epic work, as you stated, the CIA never acted upon them—and Golitsyn secretly concurred in this action. This is why he was paid by the CIA to write GP in the first place! OPENLY publish facts that are true giving credence to his claim of being a real KGB “defector;” yet the understanding from the outset was that CIA would never act upon those warnings, the Soviets and Red Chinese perfecting their alliance for America’s coming Sino-Soviet-Muslim Invasion—to the delight of Roman Catholic Knight of Malta Golitsyn, protected by brother Knights Angleton, Rocca, Dulles, McCone and William F. Buckley, Jr.

No, Gloitsyn was a real agent for Rome building the Soviet side of the Black Pope’s dialectic between “the Communist East and the Capitalist West!” And as we perceive, the USSR was built and the US was weakened in preparation for her invasion!

Lord bless,

Brother Eric


Dear Eric:

In VAIII (p. 796-798) you rendered a rather harsh verdict on Soviet defector Anatoli Golitsin.

However, I am convinced that the Jesuits’ Western intelligence services did everything to discredit and neutralize him right from the beginning. Golitsyn was framed and wrongfully accused in a most cynical fashion.

To prove my point of view, I would like to submit my following arguments to your attention.

Let me begin by quoting the decisive passages from your VAIII:

“Angleton . . . demonstrated his confidence in [Knight of Malta] Golitsin by making available to him the CIA files on the personnel of the main operating section of the CIA in the Cold War with Russia, the thousand-odd men and women of the Soviet Division. He settled in an apartment in New York City, where he was permitted to receive and read the files. During this period—perhaps three years—many of the personal and operational files were delivered to him . . . We’re talking about careers ruined, about mass resignations of counterintelligence people convinced that the CIA has been irrevocably penetrated by KGB pawns, about men we thought were our moles in Moscow—arrested and shot . . .” [...] „Golitsin was evacuated suddenly to a farm in upstate New York. The files were sent to him there but he never returned them. . . . When this was discovered, an operation was undertaken to retrieve them and, according to a CIA officer involved, ‘two vans were required to return them to the Agency—two van loads of our most secret files in the possession of a Russian in the boonies somewhere north of Albany! You can imagine what the FBI thought when they were told about what had happened to some of the most secret files!’ ” (see VAIII, pages as mentioned above)

Now first of all, the value of a defector generally lies in the intelligence he is bringing in, in this case from the Soviet Union. If the CIA wanted to pass on the above-mentioned information, there is no point in doing so through a Soviet defector sitting in NY. The whole argument is quite ludicrous.

Likewise, if traitor Angleton & Co. wanted to pass on this sensitive information to Golitsyn, they needn’t do so by handing him out loads of operational files in the above mentioned most conspicuous way, right in the limelight. They seemed rather eager to draw everybody‘s attention to this monstrous procedure.

And that’s exactly what happened. Everybody was made to believe that Golitsyn was the traitor responsible for the execution of American moles. Another side effect were those “mass resignations of counterintelligence people convinced that the CIA has been irrevocably penetrated by KGB pawns”. Thus the Jesuits’ “operation Golitsyn“ elegantly purged the CIA of its last remaining upright agents, thereby killing two birds with one stone.

The Jesuits themselves put the very truth in the mouth of one of their contemporary “Jesuit theatre” players, the moment Knight of Malta Tom Cruise recognizes: “Golitsyn was a decoy. He was just a decoy!” (in Mission Impossible. Everybody interested in this matter should view again this whole affair embedded in the main plot.)

At some point we can’t expect to understand the true nature of the Golitsyn case without studying The Perestroika Deception, written and published in his name in 1995.

There he complains that although having provided the Americans, British and French Secret Services with highly sensitive intelligence, being rewarded with the United States Government Medal for Distinguished Service and made Honorary Commander of the British Empire, and although those intelligence services appeared to be highly interested in his disclosures, he had to witness his warnings going completely unheeded through the 30-year period he provided the CIA with his Memoranda. He then decided to present his Memoranda to the public in his second book, The Perestroika Deception.

Before we advance, let’s consider the possibility that his book is a forgery intended to influence public opinion in some way. The CIA could be behind it. Or maybe the Vatican [which we know would amount to the same]?

But more importantly we shouldn’t forget that a forgery has to be credible in order to manipulate the reader. Now, the author argues that not only did the CIA authorize the publication of his memoranda [ibid. p. XIX], but also didn’t heed his warnings. This either puts the whole CIA’s assessment against his own or – if allowing for the possibility that the CIA had in fact taken counter-measures – would testify to the author’s ignorance.

In addition, employing Golitsyn in 1995 would have been tantamount to beating a dead horse, for then he had already been scared long ago by endless debates on his credibility, with a variety of conflicting theories leading nowhere but to confusion.

Therefore it appears reasonable to assume Golitsyn’s authorship of The Perestroika Deception.

Nevertheless he could still be wrong or just delirious. Therefore we have to take a closer look at his statements.

First, Golitsyn ironically opens with the following epigraph dedicated to James Angleton:

“In memory of Jim Angleton, founder and outstanding chief of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Counter-intelligence, a man of vision and courage, a warrior and comrade-in-arms, who recognized the dangers of the Soviets’ new strategic challenge.”

I say “ironical” because his relationship with Angleton is very much identical to Charles Manning’s relationship to Allen W. Dulles. Manning, right at the beginning of his highly recommendable Martin Bormann – Nazi in Exile (1981) heartily thanks “Allen W. Dulles [!], for his encouragement and assurance that I was ‘on the right track, and should keep going’’’.

Dear Eric, in one of your posts (title: “Knight of Malta Raymond Rocca: CIA Traitor to Americans and Builder of KGB”) you wrote:

‘James Angleton, Soviet KGB ‘defector’ Anatoli Golitsin and Raymond Rocca had secretly worked together for several years in purging all CIA operatives in Russia which totaled over 1000, while destroying true Soviet defectors such as Yuri Nosenko. Indeed, Golitsin refused to speak with any CIA officers save Angleton and Rocca! (Anthony Cave Brown’s Treason in the Blood (1994) makes this collusion quite clear, although Brown, like English Knight of Malta Avro Manhattan, refused to admit the obvious connection between CIA and KGB, he promoting Rome’s false dialectic of ‘the Cold War.’)”

On the other hand, in The Perestroika Deception, page XVII, Golitsyn writes that “on arrival in Washington, I asked to be received by President Kennedy. I was assured by General Taylor, the President’s security adviser, that the President would see my appropriate contributions. Mr. Robert Kennedy, the Attorney General, told me that in due time a meeting with the President would be arranged. General Taylor wrote to me in the following terms: […] I wish to assure you that the officials with whom you are now in contact have the full authority and responsibility for handling matters of this nature, and I therefore request that you give them your complete cooperation. […] You may be confident that information concerning your contribution will be brought to the attention of the President if and when appropriate. ”

If true, this would signify they made sure Golitsyn didn’t meet JFK.

I suggest that Golitsyn was quarantined right from the beginning with Angleton and Rocca acting as his “guardian angels”.

As I said, it is impossible to discuss the case without having studied attentively The Perestroika Deception.

One of Golitsyn’s assignments was to serve as senior analyst in the NATO section of the Information Department of the Soviet intelligence service from 1959 to 1960, precisely at the time when Soviet long-range strategy was being designed over a period of one generation with the KGB being reorganized to play its part in it. Below you find some of his statements (there is much more “meat”!). What is really interesting now is to see how astoundingly Golitsyn’s information coincides with what we know about the Jesuits’ machinations:

• Perestroika was no genuine people’s revolution but conceived by the Soviet leadership between 1958 and 1960, introduced from above as a Party-controlled democratization movement, “conducted by the Communist Parties, their apparatus, their security services and their armed forces.” (ibid, p. 102) […];

• The Prague Spring in 1968 and the founding of the polish trade-union movement “Solidarity” in 1980 were planned soviet exercises in social engineering; rehearsals for launching the real thing later, the Perestroika;

• The “natural aging and death of Stalin’s former victims resulted in the disappearance of active anti-Communists and the general acceptance of the régime by the Soviet population. By the 1980s, there were no social democrats or politically active nationalists left alive in the USSR. By then, the KGB and the Party apparatus had succeeded in creating conditions in which only they could form strong grass roots organizations. ” (ibid, p. 15) “A generation’s delay was needed for Stalin’s victims and their jailers to pass away before the final phase of the strategy could be introduced.” (ibid, p. 102);

• “Gorbachev was selected, coached and prepared for this appointment by the late Suslov and Andropov and by Ponomarev and Gromyko” (ibid, p. 188);

• Perestroika did not lead to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, for is it the Communist Party which continues to exercise full control of foreign policy, defense and security as well as key industries of the new “independent” countries. In this context Golitsyn points out that “the leverage which continues to be exerted by the provision of oil, gas and electricity via networks established by the ‘former’ USSR, constructed prior to ‘perestroika’, remains as powerful as under the overt Soviet Bloc system.” (ibid, p. 102) “The fact that there have been no significant disclosures by the new ‘democratic’ governments about the important secret agents of the security services operating among their respective leading ‘dissidents’, intellectuals, scientists, cultural and religious leaders or cultural defectors, confirms that continuing use will be made of the political, intelligence and security potential of these countries to further the strategy of convergence.” (ibid, p. 99-100) (the meaning of “convergence” will become clear further below)

• The split between Communist China and the Soviet Union never happened but was a “common strategic disinformation operation to secure the successful preparation of their common strategy of ‘restructuring’. […] Gorbachev’s ‘perestroika’ and Deng’s ‘Four Modernizations’ are two similar elements in the final phase of the common strategy.” (ibid, p. 35);

• “It should be remembered, too, that the emergence of ‘perestroika’ in Russia was accompanied by the tightening of military and political control in China, starting with the Tienanmen Square episode. Far from being coincidental, this was the result of a joint Sino-Soviet decision – confirmed during Gorbachev’s visit immediately ahead of the Tienanmen Square provocation – that, while one main pillar of the Leninist world was engaged in ‘perestroika’, the other should be held under firm control. Similarly, the introduction of a Chinese version of ‘perestroika’, which may be expected in China after the death of Deng, would be a probable reason for a tightening of control in Russia95.” (ibid, p. 229);

• Both the 1991 coup against Gorbachev and its failure through Yeltsin’s “heroic” stand at the White House of Russia were calculated Soviet operations. “The real participants both in the ‘coup’ and in the ‘failure’ were some 20,000 or more chosen Komsomol and Party members in Moscow with two or three tank divisions guided by their political commissars and a handful of dedicated Party officials and generals who sacrificed their prestige in the interest of the Party’s strategy and under the guidance of its strategists” and “the main external objective of the display was to demonstrate to the West that Soviet democratization is genuine, that is has the support of the people and that it is working.”

(ibid, p. 141) [in bold by Golitsyn] Moreover, “the ‘White House’ provocation59 has provided the strategists with a pretext for reasserting control from the centre” (ibid, p. 163);

▪ There never was any genuine Chechnyan independence movement. Instead, it was artificially engineered and carried out by what is known as a “counter gang”, that is, units or groups run by their own government, usually through double agents. In the Chechnyan case this was done for various reasons: a) “Contrived and televised Russian military bungling during the Chechnyan campaign has sent a strong message to the West that Russian military leaders are divided amongst themselves and that there is widespread incompetence and low morale in the army – factors which demonstrate that it can be discounted as a serious military adversary for the foreseeable future.” (ibid, p. 227); cool.gif: “The televised spectacle of Russian barbarity in Chechnya has aroused apprehension in neighboring states of comparable Russian military operations against themselves, thereby strengthening the argument that former members of the Warsaw Pact should be admitted to membership of NATO93” (ibid, p. 228). According to Golitsyn, one major idea underlying Perestroika was what of Sun Tzu who wrote, in his The Art of War: “When you are weak, make the enemy believe you are strong. When you are strong, make the enemy believe you are weak.”

• “China is destined to become a primary Soviet partner in the future World Government towards which Moscow and Peking are jointly proceeding.” (ibid., p. 36)

• “The final period of ‘restructuring’ in the United States and Western Europe would be accompanied, not only by the physical extermination of active anti-Communists, but also by the extermination of the political, military, financial and religious élites. Blood would be spilled and political re-education camps would be introduced. The Communists would not hesitate to repeat the mass repressions of their revolution in 1917, of the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe in the Second World War or of the Chinese Communist victory of 1949.48 This time, they would resort to mass repressions in order to prevent any possibility of revolt by the defeated, and to make their victory final.” (ibid., p. 34)

• “Their [the perestroikan Communist's] vision includes the extermination of the American and European capitalist and élites.” (ibid., p. 38)

• “The pragmatic ground for a new American response to ‘perestroika’ is the need to protect and preserve the American system from ‘restructuring’ and convergence with the Soviet system and to save the American people from the blood baths and re-education camps which such convergence will ultimately bring.” (ibid., p. 42)

• “Behind the mask of diplomatic and political cooperation and partnership with the Unites States and Europe, the current Russian leaders are following the strategy of their predecessors and working towards a ‘New World Order’. When the right moment comes the mask will be dropped and the Russians, with Chinese help, will seek to impose their system on the West on their own terms as the culmination of a ‘Second October Socialist Revolution’.” (ibid., p. 158) [in bold by Golitsyn]

• “The final goal of Soviet strategy [is] the convergence of the capitalist West with the Communist East on Soviet terms and the creation of a World Government as a solution to the arms race and nuclear confrontation9.” (ibid., p. 10)

But Golitsyn was wrong on two major points:

First, as you state in VAIII, Golitsyn came from a catholic family and later was made Knight of Malta. He defected, believing he could trust the West. After all, the West was the enemy of his enemies, the Soviets. Golitsyn had no idea that the power-wielding elite in the U.S. and the Soviets were ultimately playing for the same club: the Jesuits!

That’s why he never came to terms with the U.S.’s refusal to heed his warnings. America’s secret establishment and their Jesuit masters knew all too well what Golitsyn was talking about, he was “carrying coals to Newcastle”.

Secondly, the information he was allowed to receive as a Soviet KGB officer, was wrapped up in Cold War terms and concepts. Golitsyn naturally assumed the Soviets would continue to seek Soviet world control and hence try to infiltrate and finally take over the West. There he overestimated the Soviet’s might, understandable as it was for a Soviet citizen.

True, Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Slovakia were allowed membership both in NATO and the European Union. By letting them in, NATO and the European Union let in as many Trojan horses which are currently commanding some significant 97 of the European Council’s total of 345 votes.

The current European Union’s staggering velocity in imposing a pure breed Fabian-socialist government on all EU member states seems to confirm his prediction.

But both the former Soviet Republics joining NATO and the EU and the Fabian-socialists taking over the EU isn’t due to “ex-“Soviet or Russian activities. Instead, it has been made possible only because “the West” – the Jesuits! – let it happen. (Let’s bear in mind here that the Jesuits’ “West” built communist Russia right from its inception in 1917, making it one more of their “reductions”.)

Dear Eric, I would be honored if you posted this article on your website, provided you agree with its content.

I had to write this article in a little hurry. Please excuse any lapses.