Monday, February 28, 2011

The Truth isn't to be Mocked

Charlie Sheen is at it again. He issued a profanity laced tirade once before. He issued another profane tirade in the Alex Jones. Jones supports the man since Jones supports those in that world. Sheen made a subliminal Jewish baiting remark about "Haim." He also mocked those exposing the Jesuits when he talked about Vatican Assassins too. It's easy to see that Martin Sheen have connections to the Jesuits. Sheen claims to be clean in terms of drug usage, but his actions deemed that he still has an eccentric character to say the least. He has made numerous rants. The show that he's on is called Two and a Half Men. It got shut down for the rest of the season. CBS and Warner Brothers think that his actions were extreme. On the porn stars he lives with now: "What we all have is a marriage of the hearts. And to sully, contaminate, or radically disrespect this unit with a shameful contract is something I'll leave to the amateurs and bible grippers." This is shot at the Bible and people that respect marriage. This is typical of him since the mentality of many people in the hypocritical unHolywood have an anti-God, anti-moral values mentality. In his interview, he makes stereotypes about his critics and other gibberish. He claims to be for 9/11 Truth and opposes the policies of the President Barack Obama. Yet, his actions see that he needs real help to better his own life. He calls the 2 women that he's with as Goddesses. On his own magical powers: "I'm sorry, man, but I've got magic. I've got poetry in my fingertips. Most of the time--and this includes naps --I'm an F-18, bro. And I will destroy you in the air. I will deploy my ordinance to the ground." He calls himself a Vatican assassin and a warlock. This person Sheen is obviously mentally disturbed. His words are a slick shot at Eric Jon Phelps since he wrote the book "Vatican Assassins." Alex Jones (who is an Ecumenical, loves the CNP, and loves the Vatican-funded JBS like a good servant of the John Birch Society. He follows Ron Paul and Paul supports criminal attacks in Afghanistan. Well, that's another story. This is for William Cooper Jones that you slandered in the past. Cooper's excellent legacy still lives on after his death in 2001) talked about the book with him. Alex Jones refuses to expose the Knights of Malta and the CNP in real terms.  I don't agree with Eric on every issue, but if you want to disagree with the man, say his name like a man. A real man don't use subliminal shots or slick terminology in order to criticize another man. Now, the lesson is that for us who are real Anti-Vatican truth sayers is for us to continue to show the truth without fear. You can't claim that a religion is true when they were directly involved in the Inquisition, believe a cookie is God, and uses blatantly pagan components (while hypocritically claiming to be pro-Christian & anti-pagan). Even Frederick Copleston SJ invented a lot of paranoia in the conspiracy world. A hedonist like Charlie Sheen isn't a role model.

The government wants to cut Social Security. National austerity measures are here in America. This is why Wisconsin  protesters are in the streets to protest potentially losing their rights and workers' benefits. Massive loses in benefits does nothing to end the recession in the world. Now, the elite want to see how much money that they desire to cut from Social Security. Some in Congress threaten perform a government shutdown while Democrats are pushing for compromise (by agreeing with cuts to social security to stop a governmental shutdown). For years, the government raided the surplus in the Social Security trust fund. This was achieved in order to pay for wars, bank bailouts, GM, and other unfunded giveaways. Now, they want to take more from it. Since the days of the Johnson Administration, the Social Security fund was stolen in order to fund wars and the daily operations of the federal government. Johnson said that these surplus funds would be added to the general fund. The funds could be used anything and everything. Some seniors and future generations will pay the price of massive shortfalls in social security and the national debt when they have nothing to do with it. Seniors have already had cost of living increases to their SS checks frozen for the last two years.  This has been especially painful given the double-digit inflation to necessary goods like food and energy, and services like health care. Some people are protesting this reality. We can't support bailouts among the corporate elite, while programs are being cut radically. We have to peacefully end the war on terror, preserve our safety net, and fight for the right to improve our nation without austerity. A system that has a $2.5T surplus like social security is not a problem, but the banksters who created the black hole of a financial crisis and robbed $7T plus from the treasury are a natural resource that must not be protected and not get their regular multi-million dollar bonuses.

Revolutions are spreading worldwide. Some people have a sincere vision to enact real changes in the world.
Others are in fake, shill roles in trying to stir a revolution into a cartel-capitalist regime. For eons of times, the rich elite used murder, theft, and slaughter to kill innocent human beings. Wars, poverty, and homelessness have been the product of imperialist policies including financial looting (plus ecological pollution). We should never support fake revolutions at all. Revolutions can work with independent, intelligent human beings cultivating real solutions while crush fake tactics. Webster Tarpley isn't perfect, but even he is right to expose the color revolutions going on in the world. Violence is exploiting in Cairo, Libya, and places all over the world. These events occur form real grievances like economic and political problems in these nations. The question is whether the U.S. can get rid of governments in the Middle East to replace them with puppet leaders. There was the Rose Revolution in Georgia, but Georgia has a repressive government over there. The leader of Georgia is backed by the USA. NATO/IMF agents have worked in color Revolutions for various years as well. I don't believe that every demonstration in the world is a part of a CIA funded agenda though. Some protests in the Middle East have been independent, leaderless, and spontaneous. Anwar Sadat kicked out the Soviet advisers and was murdered by the Muslim Brotherhood. Egypt have a dam there and some want to use the Suez Canal and the Nile to be develop to promote more resources to be developed in that region. Some want more subsidies on food to bring down the prices of food and increase wages there. Agriculture in Egypt should be modernized in order to enhance its effectiveness.

The events in Wisconsin have existed in a controversial fashion. There are 2 incidents connected to the ongoing mass protests in Wisconsin underscore the utter ruthlessness of the ruling class in its determination to drive down the living conditions of workers. This is occurring all over America. Jeff Cox is the Republican deputy attorney general of Indiana. He recently told the liberal magazine Mother Jones something. He favored giving live ammunition. as the response to the protests in Wisconsin. He called the workers legitimately protests against benefit cuts and attacks on legal rights as political enemies and thugs. He's a lying coward. He declared that he wants deadly force. Cox, a state attorney for eight years, was fired last Wednesday, after the magazine published the exchange. There was a recent pro-union person who contacted Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. The blogger is from Buffalo, New York. He posed as the billionaire David Koch. Koch is one of the leading backers of the corporate union-busting and the Tea party Movement. His name is Ian Murphy. He recorded the call and published the transcript. This conversation lasted for 20 minutes. Walker suggested to have felony charges could be trumped up against Democratic state senators who had blocked passage of his anti-union legislation by fleeing the state (he wanted to negotiate with his opponents using a baseball bat and discussed the pros and cons of planting some troublemakers in the crowds demonstrating outside the state capitol). Walker is in the discussion said that he respected Ronald Reagan fired the air traffic controllers. He wanted to use the Wisconsin controversy to be a time to change the course of history. We live after the 100th birthday of Ronald Reagan. Cox and Walker embrace the mentality of the elite class. It isn't a secret that Walker and his crew are apart of other episodes that desire to crush the working class and turn the clock on workers' social rights. This attack have been performed by both the Republican and Democratic parties. The American trade union wish to support cuts made by Walker as along as the collective bargaining will remain. Union is one bulwark that is preventing a total corporate takeover of our nation's resources. Even the Obama administration is one the agents of the financial aristocracy that pours trillions of dollars into bank bailouts, bonuses for Wall Street executives, etc. The White House refuse to help that much bankrupt state and local governments. Barack Obama wants wage freezes on federal workers and cuts in programs. The Democrats and Republicans rescue billionaires and corporations, while demonizing schoolteachers and street sweepers as “overpaid” and “privileged.” Some see the events in Wisconsin as a wake up call. New groups and new political insight must be made to struggle for liberty and justice. Wealth can be found to have basic social needs like education, housing, and health care by printing debt free money, ending the war on terror, and other populist economic policies.

Libya is having a Revolution. Some believe that an US/NATO military intervention could be a possibility in Libya. Libya is approaching a possible civil war. Libya is an oil rich nation. It's easy to witness that Colonel Muammar Al-Qaddafi (Al-Qaddafi) is a dictator. He's been the qaid or dictator of Libya for about 42 years. Libya is different from Ben Ali's Tunisia and Mubarak's Egypt. Libya is not very submissive to the United States and the European Union. Qaddafi is a dictator that acts independent. Some fear that Egypt and Tunisia will have the military machine and neo-liberalism to remain in those respective countries if puppet new regimes exist. The EU and the US wish that Libya is more controlled by them, so they can gain their resources and be a gateway to get more resources from West Africa too. From the south, weapons are coming into Libya that are promoting revolt. Qaddafi ruled Libya after the 1969 coup against the King Idris Al-Sanusi. THe King acquiescence to Western interests. Qaddafi used the cult of personality, cronyism, and corruption in order maintain his power base in Libya. The enemy Qaddafi immorally invaded Chad to carve it up. He's an eccentric. He has an entourage of female bodyguards. He allowed many innocent people to die or go missing (including people from his own nation). case of Lebanon’s Musa Al-Sadr, the founder of the Amal Movement, is one of the most famous of these cases and has always been a hindrance to Lebanese-Libyan relations. There has been rivals in Qaddafi's regime. Opposition to him has been crushed and Lebanon's Musa Al-Sadr had been killed too. He was the founder of the Amal Movement. Qaddafi has had a very negative effect in creating and conditioning an entire hierarchy of corrupt officials in Tripoli. Each one looks out for their own interests at the expense of the Libyan people. Aref Sharif, the head of the Libyan Air Force, has renounced Qaddafi. Interior Minister Abdul Fatah Al-Yunis (Al-Younis), who is from Benghazi (Bengasi) and oversees a branch of the special operations work in Libya, has resigned. Yunis is reported to be Qaddafi’s “number two” or second in charge, but this is incorrect. Abdullah Sanusi, the head of Libyan Internal Intelligence and Qaddafi’s relative through marriage, is the closest thing to a “number two” within the structure of power in Tripoli. The opposition in Libya isn't monolithic. Some social media networks, international news stations, etc. have promoted regime change in Libya. Silvio Berlisconi and the Italian government has supported Qaddafi's regime. Civil war and democracy are used as pretext for the West to attempt to stir the revolution in Libya into their direction.

By Timothy

Libyans: No Thanks to Globalist Intervention



Libyans: No Thanks to Globalist Intervention

  •   The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store

Kurt Nimmo
February 28, 2011
Following Secretary of State Clinton’s call for intervention, a rebel leader in Libya has stated his country does not want or need any help from the United States and its globalist partners.


Hafiz Ghoga, the spokesman for the newly formed National Libyan Council in the rebel controlled eastern city of Benghazi, said “foreign intervention” would not be welcome, The Daily Caller reports.
“The rest of Libya will be liberated by the people … and Gaddafi’s security forces will be eliminated by the people of Libya,” Ghoga said during a news conference.
Mustafa Abdel Jalil, Libya’s former justice minister, said on Saturday he formed a transitional government which would lead the country for three months to prepare for elections. “Our national government has military and civilian personalities. It will lead for no more than three months, and then there will be fair elections and the people will choose their leader,” he told Al-Jazeera television.
Anti-Gaddafi forces are now in control of eastern Libya. Rebels in Benghazi are asking others cities to join the fight against the Gaddafi regime or to provide weapons and ammunition.
On Sunday, it was reported that the opposition had taken control of al-Zawiyah, west of Tripoli. Police stations and government buildings were torched, although private businesses were untouched, according to witnesses.


Clinton is scheduled to meet with EU foreign ministers in Geneva on Monday and urge them to approve tough sanctions on Libya. EU penalties will have a greater impact on Libya than U.S. sanctions earlier imposed because Libya does far more commerce with Europe.
Prior to embarking on her trip, Clinton reached out to the Libyan rebel groups and offered them “any type of assistance” to oust Gadhafi. Ghoga’s response indicates Libya is not interested in foreign intervention.
  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Obama will meet with U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon on Monday to discuss further action.
Republican Senator John McCain and independent Senator Joe Lieberman have called for Washington to recognize a provisional government being established in eastern Libya and supply it with weapons and humanitarian assistance. McCain said Washington and its allies should enforce a no-fly zone over Libya. Lieberman said what is needed now is “tangible support, a no-fly zone [and] recognition of the revolutionary government.”
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay said last week that the globalist body needs to impose a no-fly zone (NFZ) to protect civilians in Libya.
The UN, the United States, Britain, and initially France supported a NFZ imposed on Iraq prior to the 2003 invasion. It was used to conduct almost daily bombing raids on the country. In one five-month period, according to journalist John Pilger, 41 per cent of casualties in Iraq were civilians – farmers, fishermen, shepherds, their children and their sheep.
Support for a Libyan NFZ comes from both Republicans and Democrats. Supporters include Bush era neocon Elliott Abrams, Jim McDermott (D.-Wash), Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) and the diva of the supposedly non-interventionist Tea Party, Sarah Palin.
“NATO and our allies should look at establishing a no-fly zone so Libyan air forces cannot continue slaughtering the Libyan people. We should not be afraid of freedom, especially when it comes to people suffering under a brutal enemy of America,” Palin said last week.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad)
Britain and Germany have used the military in Libya. UK Special Forces used RAF Hercules planes to rescue British nationals. German foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, said on Sunday that two German military planes landed on a private runway belonging to the Wintershall AG company and evacuated 22 Germans and 112 others and flew them to the island of Crete, according to the Boston Globe.

First Horse iPS Cells Reduce Need for Embryonic Ones

Cutting Edge Newsletter


Obama’s “Humanitarian” Conquest Of Libya



Obama’s “Humanitarian” Conquest Of Libya

  • The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store
While his predator drone attacks kill 90% innocents, President suddenly develops a conscience for human suffering
Obamas Humanitarian Conquest Of Libya 280211top
Paul Joseph Watson
Monday, February 28, 2011
Before President Barack Obama even took office, we warned that his administration would continue to follow the Bush-era policy of bankrupting America both financially and morally with new wars, but that these conquests would be done in the name of a humanitarian crisis rather than a pre-emptive assault.
The “international crisis” that Vice-President Joe Biden warned Obama would face has now arrived, with the increasingly chaotic situation in Libya forging a pretext for military intervention on behalf of the United States, NATO and the United Nations.
The prevalence of the US military-industrial complex, even under a government that promised peace, was guaranteed all along. Under a Democratic administration, wars remain the health of the state, only the rhetoric behind their justification is different. By citing humanitarian concerns as a pretext, the Obama administration can send US troops into battle safe in the knowledge that they can rely on left cover – the vitriol that accompanied Bush’s foreign adventures will be non-existent.
In an article I wrote with Alex Jones back in November 2008, before Obama had even defeated McCain, we foresaw the fact that new wars would be launched under Obama with a tricked up, contrived, humanitarian veneer that would fool the left into biting their tongue and going along with it.
“Obama may eventually withdraw a portion of troops from Iraq, but mark our words, they won’t be home long before they are sent off to bomb another broken-backed third world country, this time in the name of a United Nations-backed “humanitarian” war, just as Bill Clinton presided over in Somalia and Serbia with the full support of the establishment political left.” we wrote on November 4 2008 in an article entitled, The More Things “Change” The More They Stay The Same.
Influential neo-cons who were central to military interventions in the Balkans and Iraq have now called for the United States and NATO to “immediately” prepare military action to bring down Colonel Gaddafi’s regime.
Obamas Humanitarian Conquest Of Libya 161008pptv3
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (AD)
“The appeal, which came in the form of a letter signed by 40 policy analysts, including more than a dozen former senior officials who served under President George W. Bush, was organised and released by the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), a two-year-old neo-conservative group that is widely seen as the successor to the more-famous – or infamous – Project for the New American Century (PNAC),” reports Al Jazeera.
Calling for sanctions as well as military force, the very same people responsible for the slaughter of over a million innocent Iraqis demanded “an end to the murderous Libyan regime,” miraculously developing a conscience for the suffering of human beings having gleefully massacred untold amounts of men, women and children over the last decade in the name of the war on terror.
When predator drones murder hundreds of innocent people every year, attacks which have increased under the Obama administration, it’s called unfortunate collateral damage, but when Gaddafi does the same using weapons he purchased from British and American arms manufacturers, it’s an international humanitarian crisis.
Around 89% of victims in predator drone attacks are civilians – figures from the Brookings Institute put the figure even higher at 90% – and yet Obama still thinks it’s funny to make jokes about murdering innocents in a similar vein to how Bush turned the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq into a comedy routine.
“Two words for you: predator drones. You will never see it coming,” Obama joked during a White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in May last year, in response to the notion of the Jonas brothers having any designs on his daughters. The crowd laughed it up.

While the US-backed slaughter of innocents elicits little more reaction than a few chuckles and guffaws at a White House dinner, Gaddafi’s use of similar tactics prompts Hillary Clinton to organize frantic high-level discussions with the foreign ministers of six major world powers, while proposing a no-fly zone over Libya.
Of course, the opportunity to seize control of a country that is conveniently resource rich is merely a coincidence, and I’m sure we can all be confident that any military incursion into Libya is purely motivated by genuine concern for the humanitarian plight of the Libyan people and has nothing to do with the fact that Libya holds around 46.4 billion barrels of oil reserves, the largest in Africa.

Politics in 2011

The Holocaust

Kashta_Bureh wrote:

I read something to that effect, that Eugenics actually started here in the USA, not Germany, and that the Germans were basically inspired by it and took the idea to a whole new level.
My study of American eugenics shows that Charles Darwin had a cousin, Francis Galton, who put Darwin's writings of evolutional notions into actual practice by helping to establish an once unknown secret society.
Kashta_Bureh wrote:
I use Hitler as an example of the White man's ultimate goal of global domination. As Blacks we should be thankful the Allies defeated Hitler, I don't want to think about how things would be for Blacks today if the Nazis won.
Good point, Kashta_Bureh. I remember watching a documentary about Adolf’s full aim of his reign, and it is understood that he was seeking massive control of the world with himself at the top. Release of some of Hitler's architectural plans showed the soil of the Earth was not even capable of sustaining all his building projects due to the excessive tons of concrete that would have been used to construct the buildings and bunkers should they had been put into mainstream production.
Kashta_Bureh wrote:
As Blacks we should be thankful the Allies defeated Hitler, I don't want to think about how things would be for Blacks today if the Nazis won.
I would say that we got a decent glimpse from the Jewish Holocaust. Recorded history shows that there were no set rules for complete extermination of Blacks in Germany, but some of them did undergo sterilization, beatings, and put into concentration camps to be part of experiments, to help clean, and usually killed out every three months to preserve secrecy of what was really going on in those camps.


Note bye Me: I don't agree with Kashta on other issues, but he's accurate on this one.

By Timothy


Obama's 2012 Budget - A Tool for Class War

Obama’s new budget is a continuation of Wall Street’s class war against the poor and middle class.

Wall Street wasn’t through with us when the banksters sold their fraudulent derivatives into our pension funds, wrecked Americans’ job prospects and retirement plans, secured a $700 billion bailout at taxpayers’ expense while foreclosing on the homes of millions of Americans, and loaded up the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet with several trillion dollars of junk financial paper in exchange for newly created money to shore up the banks’ balance sheets.

The effect of the Federal Reserve’s “quantitative easing” on inflation, interest rates, and the dollar’s foreign exchange value are yet to hit. When they do, Americans will get a lesson in poverty.



 The fight in Wisconsin is over Governor Walker’s 144-page Budget Repair Bill. The parts everyone is focusing on have to do with the right to collectively bargain being stripped from public sector unions (except for the unions that supported Walker running for Governor). Focusing on this misses a large part of what the bill would do. Check out this language, from the same bill (my bold):

16.896 Sale or contractual operation of state−owned heating, cooling, and power plants.(1) Notwithstanding ss. 13.48 (14)(am) and 16.705 (1), the department may sell any state−owned heating, cooling, and power plant or may contract with a private entity for the operation of any such plant, with or without solicitation of bids, for any amount that the department determines to be in the best interest of the state. Notwithstanding ss. 196.49 and 196.80, no approval or certification of the public service commission is necessary for a public utility to purchase, or contract for the operation of, such a plant, and any such purchase is considered to be in the public interest and to comply with the criteria for certification of a project under s. 196.49 (3)(b).

As Mike Konczal explains, this would allow the state to make no-bid sales, overriding public interest concerns, of heating, cooling or power plants. This rider is just an invitation to corruption, and part of a familiar pattern of selling off state-owned property to fill a budget gap in the short term, with disastrous consequences in the long term. See the sale of Chicago’s parking meters. Hat tip to Ed from Ginandtacos on this one, who writes:

If this isn’t the best summary of the goals of modern conservatism, I don’t know what is. It’s like a highlight reel of all of the tomahawk dunks of neo-Gilded Age corporatism: privatization, no-bid contracts, deregulation, and naked cronyism. Extra bonus points for the explicit effort to legally redefine the term “public interest” as “whatever the energy industry lobbyists we appoint to these unelected bureaucratic positions say it is.”



carol wrote:
If anyone can find the entire show of John Stossel's 'Battle for the Future' aired Sunday night, February 27, PLEASE watch it.
It will blow the top right off of any preconceived notions about unions and wefare just like Mt. St. Helen's. I promise.
EVIL greed....the republican ideology....evil greed...

Yes....give tax cuts to the rich and kill the old, the poor and the informed...that's republican "family values"

More than half the states want permission to remove hundreds of thousands of people from the Medicaid insurance program, a move that would represent a rare cut to a national social program.

The push sets up a showdown between states struggling with fiscal 2012 budgets and the Obama Administration, which says it may lack the authority to allow such cuts. That means Congress could be forced to settle the matter.

Nearly every state has nipped at parts of the program, which currently insures 53 million Americans. Arizona stopped covering certain organ transplants,"


Sunday, February 27, 2011

Cecile Richards misleads: Planned Parenthood does NOT provide mammograms

Hollywood's Unwritten Rule

Globalist Client Regime in Iraq Massacres Protesters




Globalist Client Regime in Iraq Massacres Protesters

  •   The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store

Kurt Nimmo
February 27, 2011
Donald Rumsfeld told the Iraqis democracy can be messy. It can also be bloody. In Alhawijah, Iraq, over the weekend the people of Iraq once again learned that American democracy is often murderous. They learned a long time ago that democracy imposed by neocons and the Pentagon at the behest of a gaggle of eugenics-minded globalists can have the effect of shutting down civilization – electricity, water, medical services, and the availability of the amenities of life we here in America take for granted.


Iraq’s government is a military dictatorship installed by the United States. The Pentagon and the CIA specialize in this sort of thing.
Obama has climbed up on his high horse and complained about the brutality of Muammar Gaddafi.
Prior to the latest staged media event, banksters, transnational oil corporations, swanky hotel chains and other industry magnates supported the eccentric dictator. Gaddafi’s son Saif was the the neoliberal frontman for Libya. Gaddafi and crew promised to “privatize” (fork over to the globalists) the Libyan economy and oil refineries and other downstream sectors of the oil industry.
Gaddafi, like Saddam before him, is merely a pawn to be used in a geostrategic chess game. The Middle East is now undergoing a violent transformation engineered by the global elite. It will not result in more freedom and iPhones for the impoverished masses. In the end, the people of the Middle East will be worse off than they now are under the iron-fisted rule of dictators installed by the United States and the former Soviet Union (a creation of Wall Street and the banksters).
Shooting your own citizens and dragging them off to torture chambers is no big deal. In fact, the globalists prefer this sort of gruesome behavior because it usually keeps the serfs – most who make around two dollars a day – in line. It is difficult to organize a resistance when you are closing in on starvation.
Meanwhile, Obama has said nothing about the Iraqi military – trained and armed by the United States – shooting protesters with live ammo and rounding up intellectuals to be tortured in dungeons, another specialty of the CIA and the Pentagon. The U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne Division taught their students well.
  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
George Bush and the neocons accomplished their mission – the wholesale destruction of Iraq. Cholera, typhoid fever, whooping cough, measles, mumps, polio, kwashiorkor, and other diseases were rare in Iraq before Bush Senior attacked the country. Bush Senior and Junior and their lost son Bill Clinton made sure such preventable diseases ravaged the country by banning antibiotics, anesthesia, oxygen, antiseptics, x-ray film, functioning medical equipment, and even aspirin under United Nations imposed sanctions.
Bush Junior finished the country off with his 2003 invasion. Iraq is now little different than a failed state in Africa.
In 1990, it was the jewel of the Middle East, never mind its CIA installed and U.S. armed dictator. Saddam Hussein was basically a creation of the CIA. His problem was that he adopted Arab pan-nationalism and this was unacceptable to the globalists. Saddam considered himself to be the reincarnation of Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian king. He complained too loudly when Kuwait slanted drilled his oil fields.
“It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, agricultural areas for the production of foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies and irrigation works, for the specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance value to the civilian population or to the adverse Party, whatever the motive, whether in order to starve out civilians, to cause them to move away or for any other motive,” states Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, 1977.
This is precisely what the Bush I and II and their adopted son did – they meticulously targeted the civilian infrastructure of Iraq.
The attacks targeted electric power generation, water treatment, pumping and distribution systems and reservoirs; telephone and radio exchanges, relay stations, towers and transmission facilities; food processing, storage and distribution facilities and markets, infant milk formula and beverage plants, animal vaccination facilities and irrigation sites; railroad transportation facilities, bus depots, bridges, highway overpasses, highways, highway repair stations, trains, buses and other public transportation vehicles, commercial and private vehicles; oil wells and pumps, pipelines, refineries, oil storage tanks, gasoline filling stations and fuel delivery tank cars and trucks, and kerosene storage tanks, sewage treatment and disposal systems; factories engaged in civilian production, e.g., textile and automobile assembly; and even historical markers and ancient sites.


Thomas J. Nagy has documented how the U.S. military deliberately targeted Iraq’s water system.
Bush Senior killed between 100,000 to 250,000 Iraqis during his first invasion. Bill Clinton imposed sanctions that killed 500,000 children and around a million adult Iraqis, and Bush Junior killed around 1.4 million Iraqis. Obama has since added to the toll by refusing to pull troops out of the country.
3 million plus dead Arabs. Mission accomplished.
Libyans now in the streets of Tripoli and Benghazi need to be highly skeptical of any support by the United States. Obama and Secretary of State Clinton do not have the best interest of the people in mind.
A month after the protests began in Egypt and deposed U.S. client Hosni Mubarak, the military is back in control. Protests are now dealt with by baton charge. Nothing much will change in Egypt, never mind the support of Google and MTV.
Egypt’s “market-oriented” economy – thanks to the IMF and “structural reforms,” including fiscal, monetary policies, privatization and new business legislations – will not result in a reduction of unemployment and poverty for the Egyptian people.
How dare the people of Iraq complain and demonstrate against the U.S. installed puppet al-Maliki. How dare they raise their voices in opposition to the destruction of their country.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad)
Sunnis, Shiites, Kurds and Christians will all experience the wrath of the state if they venture out and make their voices known.
23 were killed alone on Saturday.

Obama signs temporary extension of Patriot Act

Words on Revolution

Well, there's the poisonous culture of consumeerism, the ideology of possessive individualism. and the whole idea that anyone who isn't "successful" is himself/herself at fault for lacking "drive", intellgence, etc. It's what Dr. Du Bois in BLACK RECONSTRUCTION calls the "American Assumption." All this must be overcome. We've become so alienated from even the notion of coummunity that ordinary civic engagement with one's neighbors is now regarded as an odd activity. Even rent and waistline parties that were so popular in inner city communities when I was coming up, have now become far less common.
Part of the process of making a revolution--nonviolent or otherwise--is the CREATION of COMMUNITY. Within the creation of community and the cooperative spirit, one already finds the seeds of REVOLUTION in society which estranges people from each other, and reifies human relations.
It is of no small importance that the FBI feared seemingly harmless ventures as community theatre or societies of poets. Can you imagine COINTELPRO infiltrating societies of poets?
It is no coincidence that the FBI feared the Black Panthers's breakfast programs, political and cultural education initiatives, and community clinics more than they ever feared the Panthers' guns.
The authorities knew very well that a community organization with a few shotguns and leather jackets were no threat to the existing order with its massive military and paramilitary forces.

But the IDEAS that the Panthers were spreading, and the EXAMPLES of COMMUNITY solidarity and self-determination---these were DANGERS that the ruling classes could not ignore.
Yet what could be more NONVIOLENT than a breakfast program to feed hungry children whom the system has abandoned? What could be more PEACEFUL and than EDUCATION program? But an education program which transcents the limits of the established corporate school system, which invites people to look at the world in NEW WAYS which break with the capitalistic worldview, and clinics which (like breakfast program) depends on SELF-DETERMINED community support--these were clearly revolutionary challenge....a challenge which threatened to win millions away from old ideas which uphold and legitimate the status quo.
Ideas are more powerful than bullets.



And it's not only racism that needs to be overcome. Many are sold on the cliches of capitalism... the boss deserves to have a much better lifestyle, etc., a lot of social Darwinism which has been sold to people by the corporate media.

And it's not only whites full of this brainwashing.

-Barros Serrano
If you're not DEAD you can awaken. Whites have been sold the snake oil of racism and white supremacy for centuries. And yes, it's deeply rooted in American culture.
Yet, some whites clearly see through it. Others may come to see through the hype later. And there may be some who never will. Of those who do awake, as with those of earlier generations who cast off their blinders, it is possible for form a new popular democratic movement.
Progressive historian Howard Zinn---a white ally of the freedom movement of the 1960s--suggested that about 25% of the American people are soooooo far to the Right that there's no reaching them. And, of course, the vast majority of those American reactionaries are white.
But that leaves open about 75% of the American population who MIGHT still be won. Who wins them over will determine the future history of America, and much of the world.
But if we assume that the vast majority of whites are incorrrigible bigots and reactinaries, then we end up abandoning the field for the Right to REALLY win over the majority.
That would be GROSS irresponsibility on our parts, and would virtually guarantee the triumph of an American fascism.
Anti-racist progressives of all races, creeds and nationalities mush commit to winning over the majority of Americans of all races, creeds and colors to a vision of more human society void of racism, sexism and class oppression.
And nonviolent struggles like those in Madison, Wisconsin and Ohio may offer part of the solution, part of the way forward.
If we fail to seize the challenge--SEIZE THE TIME--as Bobby Seale would have it, then we are facing our doom.
This is a struggle between freedom and despotism, between civilization and barbarism. We cannot afford to lose this battle.

Harrisson wrote:

Oh, I am definitely keeping an eye on those happenings, brother.
How ironic that the first African-American U.S. President is tasked by Western corporate elites with the challenge of taming and stage-managing an inconvenient, populist revolt on African soil.
Victory! At least thus far. For the struggle continues. A Luta Continua!

Very important: YOUTH led the way! And the ideas that some of them have. Notions of autonomous community (which Kathleen Cleaver now talks about) have entered the lexicon of revolt.
And I can't forget the words of a poorly paid, 25 year old Egyptian English tutor: "We don't want you MONEY. RESPECT us as HUMAN BEINGS!"

Or as striking Black sanitation workers led by King had on their placards: "I am a man!"

RESPECT US AS HUMAN BEINGS! At the end of the day, that's what freedom is about. That's what Revolution is about. The right to be human in a human community.




In Egypt, about 65% of the population is under 30 years old.
And it was YOUTH that led the way. Such was the case with the Black movement in the 1960s, the women's movement, and the peace movements as well.
The nonviolent resistance reminds me in many ways of our movement in America, especially in the American South.

Also, the Movement in Egypt has thus far remained independent from the theocrats, despite Mubarak's last ditch effort to work out some kind of deal with the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Revolution wasn't started or led by the Muslim Brotherhood, nor by any other sectarian outfit. It has been created by the Egyptian people themselves.
Moreover, it was a revolt of Egyptians CHRISTIANS as well as MUSLIMS--united against tyranny. Hopefully, they will maintain this unity across religious boundaries.(Indeed, it was a positive sign weeks before the current insurgency when THOUSANDS of Egyptian Muslims formed human shield between their Christian brethren and militant Islamists when those Islamist began making attacks on Coptic churches).
Furthermore, we cannot forget the inspiring sight of hundreds of thousands of insurgent WOMEN in Liberation Square making their voices heard in the making of history. Malcolm X once said that in his travels abroad he noted that the most progressive countries were those in which the emancipation of women were at center of the struggle for freedom. Let's us remember this.
Also, it seems that youth have found new ways of organizing for a democratic revolution with the use of new technologies of communication that cannot be as easily censored as radio, TV or newspapers. Such seems to be the case in Iran (I ear the opposition may be planning to bring their Green Revolution back into public spaces as early as next week).

Now one of my fellow philosophers and colleagues posed to us (faculty and students) a question:
If the Egyptians can do what they've done under a DICTATORSHIP, what the hell is holding us up?
It 's time to resume our fight against racism and economic injustice, against poverty and war, aaginst militarism and imperialism, against the patriarchal degradation of women.
It is time for Americans resume the fight for a more RADICAL DEMOCRACY in a cooperative society.
Time to build a NEW America, and contribute what we can to the transformation of the world.


Harrisson wrote:

I hope so, brother, I hope so.
However, I have to say that my first long-term exposure to unionized public-sector employees was troubling. It was troubling to see a white, working-class man with relatively secure federal government employment, labeling himself as "conservative," seeing himself as a victim of affirmative action, and voting a right-wing Republican agenda.
In fact, a disturbingly high percentage of union households overall, vote Republican. How much a problem this is in the public-sector unions is not clear to me.
Nonetheless, I find myself ENCOURAGED by the enormous ruckus and agitation that the labor movement is making in Wisconsin state capitol.
I read the news developments with great satisfaction and think "Give 'em hell!!!"
Maybe some of those conservative white union workers now voting Republican (or at best, "blue dog Democrat") will begin taking a new look at things as they see those reactionaries taking away their jobs, benefits and collective bargaining rights.
King once said that if whites were as AWARE of their oppression as the Blacks, there would have been more whites picketing and protesting than African-Americans.
Guy Debord, of the leftist French Situationist International once wrote (shortly after Watts uprising in LA): The Blacks are ALIENATED. So are the REST of Americans, but the Blacks are AWARE of it.
With the awakeing of the awareness of whites--providing we don't lost OUR OWN AWARENESS---can mark the beginning of a new era.
Eventually we can have a new revolutionary society in which a right to a liberated life of dignity and happiness will be the birthright of every man, woman and child on earth.
Victory to the the working class insurgents of America! Victory to the insurgent peoples of the Middle East. Long live freedom!



Libya: Is Washington Pushing for Civil War to Justify a US-NATO Military Intervention?

Saturday, February 26, 2011

The History of Freemasonry


War Uber Alles

Is Barack Obama About To Order The U.S. Military To Invade Libya?



Is Barack Obama About To Order The U.S. Military To Invade Libya?

  • The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store
The American Dream
Feb 26, 2011
As insane as it might sound, the United States may soon be getting involved in another war in the Middle East.  According to White House spokesman Jay Carney, “no options” have been taken off the table when it comes to the situation in Libya.  By saying that “all options” are being considered, that is basically a way for the Obama administration to threaten Gadhafi without actually coming right out and threatening him.  In recent days, news reports have been appearing all over the mainstream media hyping the possibility that we may have to take military action in Libya.  This would not be happening if the White House did not want it to happen.  The truth is that Barack Obama is apparently seriously considering U.S. military action in Libya.  At first that would probably consist of air strikes and missile attacks, but if the Obama administration decides that it is going to take ground forces to get the job done then we could eventually see the U.S. military actually invade Libya.  But the truth is that any military intervention in Libya would be a really, really bad idea.  Is it really wise to stick our young men and women into the middle of an incredibly bloody civil war?  Do we want to spill even more American blood in order to protect “U.S. interests”?  Do we really want to spend young American lives to keep the price of oil low?  The truth is that the world hates us enough already.  How much more will they hate us if we decide to start bombing Libya into oblivion?
All kinds of justifications are already being floated for potential military action in Libya.  Barack Obama is publicly declaring that the killing of civilians in Libya has got to stop.  As if the U.S. government cares so much about the deaths of civilians.  Millions upon millions of Africans have been slaughtered in Africa over the last couple of decades in numerous civil wars and we have not intervened.
So why now?
Well, because oil is at stake.
If Libya did not produce about 2 percent of the world’s oil nobody in the U.S. government would really care much about what is going on in Libya.
But because Libya is Africa’s largest oil producer suddenly the death of their civilians becomes a matter of “international concern”.
Another reason being floated for taking military action in Libya is the “weapons of mass destruction” that Gadhafi supposedly has.
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal went on and on about how concerned the U.S. government is about the “weapons of mass destruction” that are still under Gadhafi’s control….
The government of Col. Moammar Gadhafi hasn’t destroyed significant stockpiles of mustard gas and other chemical-weapons agents, raising fears in Washington about what could happen to them—and whether they may be used—as Libya slides further into chaos.
The Wall Street Journal article also stated that U.S. officials believe that Gadhafi possesses “1,000 metric tons of uranium yellowcake” which they believe are a serious threat to the international community.
Doesn’t that sound exactly like something we have all been told before?
The truth is that so much of what we are seeing in the mainstream news right now are “trail balloons” that are being floated by the U.S. government.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (AD)
Is Barack Obama About To Order The U.S. Military To Invade Libya?  250111banner1
They want to see how the American people and the rest of the world are going to respond.
Just check out the CBS video news report posted below.  The American people are being mentally prepared for potential U.S. military action against Libya….

But what is this really all about?
Are Barack Obama and the U.S. government really that concerned about the deaths of a few thousand protesters?
The truth is that they are concerned about Libya’s oil fields.
Bank of America Merrill Lynch analyst Sabine Schels recently told Reuters the following….
“We expect Libyan production to be shut down completely and we might lose sweet crudes from Libya for a prolonged period of time.”
That is what this is all about – keeping the flow of oil going around the world.
But the media is trying to pull on our heart strings by highlighting the plight of the protesters.
A recent CNN report quoted Navi Pillay, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights, as saying the following about the escalating violence of Libya….
“Although reports are still patchy and hard to verify, one thing is painfully clear: in (a) brazen and continuing breach of international law, the crackdown in Libya of peaceful demonstrations is escalating alarmingly with reported mass killings, arbitrary arrests, detention and torture of protesters.”
So the United States, the “police of the world”, have to step in and save those poor people, right?
Oh, and if the first thing we do is to secure “key infrastructure” such as the oil fields that will be okay too, right?
We live in an insane world.
If the international community wants to take action against Libya, shouldn’t this go through the United Nations?
Well, apparently the United Nations Security Council is going to discuss a draft resolution that would impose economic sanctions on Libya, but that isn’t going to mean much to Gadhafi at this point.
If the United States and NATO want to take military action, they are going to have to do it on their own because both Russia and China would likely block the approval of military force by the United Nations.
But wasn’t Obama supposed to be a peacemaker?
Well, that is what he wanted you to believe.
Not only has Obama greatly escalated the war in Afghanistan, now it looks like Obama is laying the groundwork for another war in the Middle East.
In a recent article entitled “Analysts: More Libyan bloodshed could prompt U.S., NATO intervention“, Michael Martinez of CNN noted that the White House has publicly acknowledged that Barack Obama is discussing how to “immediately respond” to the crisis in Libya with other world leaders….
In separate phone conversations with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and British Prime Minister David Cameron, Obama “expressed his deep concern with the Libyan government’s use of violence, which violates international norms and every standard of human decency, and discussed appropriate and effective ways for the international community to immediately respond,” the White House statement said.
So what would a “response” by the United States look like?  Well, apparently a whole “range of options” is being considered….
“The leaders discussed the range of options that both the United States and European countries are preparing to hold the Libyan government accountable for its actions, as well as planning for humanitarian assistance,” the White House statement said.
So does this “range of options” include military action?
On Thursday, U.S. State Department spokesman Philip Crowley commented on the ongoing discussions inside the Obama administration about the situation in Libya and admitted that “the military is fully involved in these discussions and doing its own thinking about options that can be presented to the president.”
As the violence in Libya escalates there are some troubling signs that the U.S. is getting ready to do something.  The U.S. embassy in Libya has been closedand U.S. personnel have been pulled out of the country.
If Gadhafi makes a “wrong move” we could potentially see military action within days. says that an anonymous “European official” is claiming that the U.S. and NATO have already been very busy making plans for military action against Libya….
The source said NATO and US warplanes stationed in Italy may be ordered to take down Libyan planes, and that electronic warfare against them may already have been implemented.
The source told al-Quds al-Arabi that NATO forces may launch an aerial attack on Libya or fire missiles from warships positioned in international waters near Tripoli. Libyan army weapons caches may also be targeted, the source said.
The rest of the world is not amused by all of this.
For example, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is urging the United States and NATO to stay out of what is going on in Libya….
“Give them the opportunity to determine their own fate through natural means and not with any kind of outside interference.”
There is a lot of wisdom in what Putin is saying there.  This is a fight for the Libyan people.  It should be up to them to decide the destiny of their own nation.  If the United States intervenes now, it will no longer be a “revolution of the people”.
The truth is that Libya is not a place we want to be sending U.S. troops.  Libya is a deeply divided nation made up of a large number of tribal factions.  Many of the tribal factions seriously dislike one another.  That is not something you want to step into the middle of.
Not only that, but the people of Libya are not too fond of the United States.  Any U.S. military intervention, no matter how “benevolent”, would be deeply resented.  Our soldiers would rapidly become targets just like they are in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The U.S. government certainly cannot afford any more wars.  We have spentover a trillion dollars on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.  We are in debt up to our eyeballs and we cannot afford another war that is going to cost us hundreds of billions more dollars.
Not only that, but when the U.S. military gets into a country they almost never leave.
Today, the U.S. military has a total of over 700 foreign military bases and is in 130 different countries around the world.  We never left Germany after World War 2.  We never left Japan after World War 2.  We never left South Korea after the Korean War.  It looks like we will not be leaving Iraq or Afghanistan for quite a long time to come.
Can we really afford to be the police of the world?  Can we really afford to have troops in almost every nation on earth?
Hopefully Barack Obama will come to his senses and will not order military action against Libya.  This is a Libyan revolution and this is a fight for the Libyan people to decide.
Any intervention by the United States would be absolutely disastrous.

Goldman Sachs Got Billions From Taxpayers Thru AIG For Its OWN Account, Crisis Panel Finds; Contradicting SWORN Testimony From Execs


Goldman Sachs Got Billions From Taxpayers Thru AIG For Its OWN Account, Crisis Panel Finds; Contradicting SWORN Testimony From Execs
Published on 02-24-2011 Email To Friend Print Version

Source: Huffington Post

Goldman Sachs collected $2.9 billion from the American International Group as payout on a speculative trade it placed for the benefit of its own account, receiving the bulk of those funds after AIG received an enormous taxpayer rescue, according to the final report of an investigative panel appointed by Congress.
The fact that a significant slice of the proceeds secured by Goldman through the AIG bailout landed in its own account--as opposed to those of its clients or business partners-- has not been previously disclosed. These details about the workings of the controversial AIG bailout, which eventually swelled to $182 billion, are among the more eye-catching revelations in the report to be released Thursday by the bipartisan Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

The details underscore the degree to which Goldman--the most profitable securities firm in Wall Street history--benefited directly from the massive emergency bailout of the nation's financial system, a deal crafted on the watch of then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who had previously headed the bank.

"If these allegations are correct, it appears to have been a direct transfer of wealth from the Treasury to Goldman's shareholders," said Joshua Rosner, a bond analyst and managing director at independent research consultancy Graham Fisher & Co., after he was read the relevant section of the report. "The AIG counterparty bailout, which was spun as necessary to protect the public, seems to have protected the institution at the expense of the public."

Goldman and AIG both declined to comment.

When news first broke in 2009 that Goldman had been an indirect beneficiary of the AIG bailout, collecting the full value of some $14 billion in outstanding insurance polices it held with the firm, the officials who brokered the deal justified these terms as a necessary stabilizer for the broader financial system. As the world's largest insurance company, AIG's inability to cover its outstanding obligations could have threatened the solvency of the institutions holding its policies, asserted the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which oversaw the deal.

Goldman fended off claims that the arrangement amounted to a backdoor bailout by asserting that none of the money from the AIG rescue landed in its own coffers. Rather, those funds went to compensate clients or institutions on the other side of its trades, Goldman said.

Russia Plans to Spend $650 Billion on New Weapons

Friday, February 25, 2011

The Future is Now, but Justice is will reign forever.

Transhumanism is still a real agenda promoted all over the place. Singularity is about making man a god to be immortal basically (with technological and scientific means). TIME Magazine have an article called "Entitled 2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal." This cover is found in the February 21 edition. It shows or portrays a human with a shaved head plugged into the Internet literally. On the back of the person's head is the embedded termional plug for the purpose of connecting with the Internet. This is similar to the acts of the character Neo from the Matrix series or anyone of the cyberized characters in "Ghost in the Shell." Raymond Kurzweil have promoted transhumanism heavily in the 21st century. Singularity wants man and machine to merge  in order to transform humanity into "godhood." Its proponents want to promote the new man in almost eugenics terms. Kurzweil wants super intelligent computers mixed with human bodies, minds, and civilization to develop society. He wants cyborgs to reign to extend our human physical abilities. This artificial intelligence in his mind can cause human beings to live longer in their life expectancy. Some want IPhones in people's brains. We have television, video games, the Internet, and other technology in the world. We have online communities and social networking sites that use influences to promote futuristic devices. There are brain chips all over the place. It is interesting to note a report by Richard Norton-Taylor entitled Revolution, flashmobs, and brain chips. A grim vision of the future, published in the Guardian in 2007. In this article, Norton-Taylor relays the findings of a 90-page report released by a British Ministry of Defence team tasked with future “strategic context” that the British military might face in the future. Norton-Taylor said that in 2035 an implantable information chip can be wired directly to the brain. The Singularity University promotes such agenda and it's hosted by NASA. It's not a secret that Google is another corporate front for intelligence agencies. It's a founding sponsor of the University as well. Bill Gates said the Kurzweil is the best person to predict the future of artifical intelligence. The future is now. We have nanotechnology, eugenics, the Human Genome Project, and other technological entities. We have Brain Machine Interfacing, Singularity movement, and Cloud Technology. The essence of neo-eugenics is to not improve humanity literally. It's about to create a population that may be strong physically, but docile socially in order to complete an assignment (without having that independent thinking to question authorities that force them to do these jobs). While this is going on, the real elite are trying to have life extension technology with population control tactics in order to have some neo-feudal system.  The future is uncertain and might be more strange than now. The Pentagon and British Ministry have drills to prepare for martial law due to economic crisis. There is how the federal government for over 30 years having a secret program to take blood from every newborn to own its DNA. The federal and state governments are losing lawsuits over it.

The Job situation is of course not good in America. President Barack Obama wants business leaders to have job creation ideas, but policies exist now have jobs being shipped overseas (in a new one world economy). Now, a new free trade agreement is being proposed with South Korea.  Other bad free trade agreements have hurt the U.S. economy. America consumes more and produce less. There is a huge gap between the rich and the poor. There should be programs to create plus keep American jobs in America. Barack Obama and his allies have worked with the same multinational corporations making huge profits by outsourcing and offshoring our jobs. Globalism isn't wonderful since it's literally destructive. We should have innovation and advances in technology, but not job killing solutions. Some products cost much more than others. Multinational corporations don't hire as much American workers since to them it's too expensive to pay cash to them. S, they high motivated workers in other places who will gladly work for slave like labor wages. So, these jobs in America are competed against jobs worldwide. What's occurring in Wisconsin is happening worldwide. Reactionaries want jobs, benefits, and public services either gone or radically cut. There are plenty of skilled workers to make iPads, but some companies don't want to pay real wages to qualified workers here in America. But senior White House adviser (actually she pretty much runs the White House) Valerie Jarrett insists that Obama “wants to make sure that the federal government is doing everything that we can to foster the kind of environment where companies want to invest and grow and hire people right here in America." According to the Economic Policy Institute view that the free trade agreement will cost the U.S. about 159,000 jobs. There are free trade proposals with Colombia and Panama. Big Business isn't helping American workers. There are more than 4 million American workers that have been out of work for more than 1 year. Middle class workers in the USA make less money today than they did back in 1971. There is a median duration of unemployment lasting 20 weeks beyond just 10 weeks. There are structural problems in the economy that ought to be solved in order to improve our financial system. Some jobs are shipped to China. The U.S. trade deficit with China in 2010 was 27 times larger than it was back in 1990. America spent more than 4 dollars on goods and services from China for every one dollar that China spends on goods and services form the USA (currency manipulation, technological scandals, etc. existed in China). This isn't fair trade. This doesn't mean every Chinese person is an enemy and we should invade China. That's silliness. The deal is that there is corrupt people worldwide, we have a right to expose the truth, and desire real reforms in the world. There are over 42,000 U.S. factories shut down in America since 2001. The U.S. economy now has 10 percent fewer “middle class jobs” than it did just ten years ago even though our population has grown substantially, and half of all American workers now earn $505 or less per week. Free trade doesn't work to build us up. It promotes a globalist economic system. The poor and the middle class suffer and only a revolutionary of values can solve problems.

The Pro-Life NYC billboard on the black abortion rate was recently taken down. This was influenced by pro-abortion activists in New York City. The poster warned about the inordinately high abortion rates involving African American women and children. The pro-life group that has been involving in developing the billboard is called Life Always. They have paid for the billboard. Abortion kills about 300,000 black unborn children annually. New data from the CDC today indicates black babies are victims of abortion at a much higher rate than white people and Hispanics in the USA. The billboard is located in SoHo. It presents the image of a young black girl. The words on it reads that following: "...The most dangerous place for an African American is in the womb." The outdoor advertising company that sold the space to the pro-life group for the billboard said on Thursday that it would remove the image because of the employees at the Mexican restaurant located on the bottom floor of the several story building bearing the ad were facing harassment over its pro-life message. “It’s down, or at least it should be coming down soon,” Peter Costanza, the general manager for Lamar Advertising, told the New York Times. “Why did I take it down? Yesterday, somebody came into the restaurant harassing the waiters and waitresses. I don’t want any violence to happen around the buildings there.” On the other hand, a woman answering the phone at Lupe's East L.A. Kitchen couldn't verify to the Times that any harassment had been taking place. Constanza said that the decision to remove the billboard wasn't about politics even though several black activists in the city spoke out against it (also, many black people are sincerely Pro-Life too). The Pro-Life group Life Always believes that politics have something to do with the decision to remove the billboard in Soho. The billboard's message is pretty much accurate. Abortion is a tragedy and folks have a right to use efforts to decrease the rates of abortions among all peoples. Pastor Stephen Broden is a member of the group's board of directors. He wanted to have abortion seen as traumatic and emotional. The leading cause of death for African Americans is abortion. Establishment liberals like MoveOn, Letita James (a City council member who represents parts of Brooklyn), and Freemason Al Sharpton were outraged by the pro-life billboard. They wanted a new conference to oppose it if it wasn't taken down. “The billboard was offensive, especially during Black History Month, and I had intended to hold a press conference Friday in front of the billboard to protest the message of racial profiling and against a woman”s right to choose,” Sharpton said Thursday. Sharpton is such a lying deceiving hypocrite. The billboard wasn't about promoting racial profiling neither is it about denying reproductive rights (as abortion on demand ends the total reproduction of a child and it kills black people. Killing black children is not representative of black cultural power at all. Abortion on demand has never been about black culture). The billboard was about calls for reform in society. Planned Parenthood use puppets like Women of Color Policy Network and ally with Al Sharpton to promote a policy that views unborn life as less than human. Meanwhile, the mother of the young girl who appears in the ad is upset that her daughter’s image is associated with it. Tricia Fraser said her daughter signed a contract to become a stock image model knowing that her image could be used in any number of campaigns with which she or her daughter might disagree. “I would never endorse something like that,” the mother of 6-year-old Anissa Fraser told Fox television today. It's a fact that Planned Parenthood was using eugenics and population control since its inception to harm people of color. NYC has an abortion rate of almost 60 percent rate for black women. That's a problem. The billboard is similar to a campaign Heroic Media ran in Jacksonville, Florida and Austin Texas last year, that Life Always took over in January. The billboard follows a December city health department report showing 41 percent of pregnancies in New York City ended in abortion in 2009. Blacks had the highest number of abortions with 40,798, the report indicated. We shouldn't be a bunch of Republicans, but we have every right to call for reforms in decreasing the abortion in comprehensive solutions completely.

Glen Beck is very slick. Some of what Glen Beck is saying is true, yet he mixes it with a neo-con spin on it. Beck is receiving millions of dollars to compromise the truth in order to have great coverage in compromising the real information. Beck got orders from Bush Jr. and now he acts like he is opposing world government. Beck is being used as a synthesis to allow the Left/Right Paradigm in the USA society. Glen Beck is bound in a Left/Right control grid. Glen Beck admits that there is an agenda for world government and a world currency (which is true), but he spins it as a totally a leftist deal. Once, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity denies that a world government and world currency agenda is here. Now, Hannity admits it. Beck believes that Soros runs the globalization agenda when they are mid level people in the whole hierarchy of power. George Soros is a CFR member, a Bilderberger, and is pro-euthanasia. He's an enemy, but he isn't in the top of the pyramid of power. Beck is on FOX News. FOX News once demonized people who exposed the new world order. Now, they allow Beck to exist in order to try to discredit sincere people exposing globalization. FOX News supports the war on terror. How are they anti-establishment when they support the establishment's goals of the war on terror, radical free trade, and other evils in the globe. Google was funded by the CIA, the NSA, and MIT. Glen Beck exposes Google, but lies and says that it's a part of an agenda to promote a Muslim caliphate. Youtube's parent Google is a corporate member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Glen Beck wants to support the Patriot Act. Beck mimics the truth. Yet, there is a big corporate power structure. Even Rupert Murdoch uses money to fund the carbon tax movement. Maddow and Matthews talked about torture, the Patriot Act, and other issues during the Bush years. Now, with President Barack Obama as President, they don't talk about these issues that much. They even support much of the war on terror situation going on. They are Left Gatekeepers that talk about some legitimate issues, but refuse to show the big picture. The big picture is that both the mainstream Left and Right are used by corporate power in order to have more disunity, divided American society (some elitists desire a new world order system too as validated by books, quotes, documentaries, etc.).

Secret Societies are real. People have discovered links between Yale University and the Bavarian Illuminati all of the time. It's been established that Thomas Jefferson was an apologist for Illuminati founder Adam Weishaupt. Jefferson called him in 1800 as "an enthusiastic philanthropist." However, in Professor of Divinity David Tappan’s “A Discourse Delivered in The Chapel of Harvard College, June 19, 1798,” he explained that the Illuminati operated only “under the mask of universal philanthropy.” Tappan further remarked: “But what connection had this German association with the Revolution and consequent measures of France? The answer is, the secret papers of the society prove that it had extended its branches into the latter country before the year 1786; that Mirabeau and Talleyrand, two distinguished agents in that revolution, were officers of a secret lodge at Paris in 1788; that during the sitting of the Notables in that year deputies were sent to France from the German Illuminati, at the request of this lodge, to aid in the projected subversion of religion and government…. The German agents, on their arrival, persuaded lodges to form a political committee, whose object should be to devise the best means for a general revolution. From these committees arose the famous Jacobin Club, whose primary aim was to revolutionize not only France, but, if possible, the world.” Tappan then explained that “The supposition of some deep and extensive a conspiracy against government and religion… easily accounts for… certain newspapers and other productions… which aim or direfully tend to undermine the religious and moral, as well as civil institutions, principles and habits of our country….” The Skulls and Bones existed from 1832. There is the front page of the National Research Institute's Trumphet (from October 1988) reads that: "...Toward the end of the ceremony of initiation into the ‘Regents Degree of Illuminism,’ according to a tract, ‘A skeleton is pointed out to him (the initiate), at the feet of which are laid a crown and a sword. He is asked whether that is the skeleton of a king, a nobleman, or a beggar.’” According to Ron Rosenbaum in his article, “Last Secrets of Skull and Bones” (Esquire, September 1977), this statement is quite similar to the words (in German), “Who was the fool, who was the wise man, beggar, or king? Whether poor or rich, all’s the same in death,” which appears above a painting of skulls in room 322 of Skull & Bones. This shows an Illuminati/Skulls and Bones tie. President Franklin Roosevelt ancestor and NY assemblyman Clinton Roosevelt authored "The Science of Government Founded in Natural Law" in 1841. Clinton is accused of being apart of the Columbian Lodge of the Illuminati, yet some scholar deny its existence in that era of time. The book presents a pro-Weishaupt philosophy. The Assemblyman wrote that: "...There is no God of justice to order things aright on earth; if there be a God, he is a malicious and vengeful being, who created us for misery.” CR referred to other members of his “order” as “the enlightened ones” (the Illuminees).
The use of the word, “cosmopolitan,” is of special interest because in ex-Illuminatus Ernst von Gochhausen’s novel Exposure of the Cosmopolitan System: In Letters From ex-Freemasons (1786), one reads: “The hero asked his superior very frankly, ‘What purposes do the Illuminati have in infiltrating and now dominating Masonry?’ The reply was blunt and simple: ‘To emancipate all of mankind from religious and political slavery. Put specifically, to advance deism and cosmopolitanism.’… World citizenship. What does it mean? You are either a citizen [of the world] or you are a rebel. There is no third choice.” The Center for Civil Education or the CCE promote a cosmopolitan system. Today, other people desire people to be the citizen of the world or world citizenship. Today, we have a society where national boundaries are more fluid than ever before. There is nothing wrong with wanting solutions in a global scale or having concern for all peoples (of every color in the world), but I do believe in nationalism too.

By Timothy