Monday, November 30, 2009

Don't be Decieved

Lord Monckton


Some facts about this Lordie:

- Knight of Malta

- member of the Worshipful Company of Broderers

- Member of The Venerable Order of Saint John

- advisor to Margaret Thatcher

- Monckton is listed as a "Global Warming" expert for the Heartland Institute, a Chicago-based freemarket think tank. The Heartland Institute frequently attacks the scientific evidence for human-caused climate change. The Heartland Institute has received over $791,000 from oil-giant ExxonMobil since 1998.

The tobacco industry has also been a regular funder to the Heartland Institute, with at least $190,000 coming from Philip Morris since 1993. The Heartland Institute maintains a smoker's rights section on its website called "The Smoker's Lounge."

- Monckton is listed as a "Chief Policy Advisor" for the Science and Public Policy Institute (SPPI). The SPPI was until recently managed under the name "Center for Science and Public Policy Institute" by another freemarket think tank called the Frontiers of Freedom.
The Frontiers of Freedom has received over $1 million in funding from oil-giant ExxonMobil.

- Quote: "there is only one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and to quarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the population should be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with the virus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, and permanently."

- He was on the Alex Jones Show

Need I say more?



I also spotted much of this on his Wikipedia page. The question is then, what's his role? Controlled opposition? Not only does he debunk the AGW scam but he's also pretty vocal on the idea that this is leading to world government.

-Revolution Harry


That's the question. I does smell of controlled opposition. Lets presume this is controlled opposition. It could have a sinister agenda to seperate the people into groups which they can collect in the future in order to eradicate them, because they can not have aware people in orwells world. That is what I think one of the reasons why they gave us the internet.



Man made global warming is a fraud, just like global terrorism. It's purpose is to unite the world against a threat that will destroy us all. Please see the Iron Mountain Report. "Clean" technologies have been available for a very long time. They have been suppressed to cause more pollution and to further the cause of global warming aka giving the government more power over your life. Once the anti-Christ comes into play he'll "solve" global warming by implementing these technologies... at least that's what it looks like to me. The problem isn't global warming, its pollution. Most if not all these environmental groups are nothing more than Marxist political groups. On the other hand, those on the right are doing nothing to stop pollution.

Tobacco companies started using polonium fertilizers in the 1950's. This is what really causes cancer in cigarettes. Tobacco, in its natural form and when not abused, has some health benefits. The "tobacco" these major corporations are using is not even real tobacco (see video below). I wouldn't be surprised if these tobacco corporations are funding the "cigarettes are bad for you" crusade. The more dangerous cigarettes are made to look in society the more cool it is to smoke them. There is nothing "free" about these free market think tanks. The Jacksonian days are over, in the 14th American Corporate Empire you can either "vote" for the commies or for the cartel capitalists. Don't let the cartel capitalists deceive you into thinking their form of capitalism is free market capitalism.We had another thread on Monkton here... I think it was in the general section, I'm not sure.

Tobacco companies started using polonium fertilizers in the 1950's. This is what really causes cancer in cigarettes. Tobacco, in its natural form and when not abused, has some health benefits. The "tobacco" these major corporations are using is not even real tobacco (see video below). I wouldn't be surprised if these tobacco corporations are funding the "cigarettes are bad for you" crusade. The more dangerous cigarettes are made to look in society the more cool it is to smoke them. There is nothing "free" about these free market think tanks. The Jacksonian days are over, in the 14th American Corporate Empire you can either "vote" for the commies or for the cartel capitalists. Don't let the cartel capitalists deceive you into thinking their form of capitalism is free market capitalism.We had another thread on Monkton here... I think it was in the general section, I'm not sure.

-Jefferson Smith

Senator Rockefeller

Another Article

Another Article

Eric on Angels and Demons


Angels and Demons: Jesuit Illuminati Destroying the Papacy

user posted image

Posted by EJP on Nov 27th, 2009

The movie Angels and Demons suggests the future destruction of the Pope’s Sovereign State of Vatican City which has become synonymous with its host, the ancient city of Rome. Whenever anyone thinks of Rome, he immediately thinks of the Vatican and St. Peter’s Square. That we may be clear as to the future of Vatican City, according to a literal reading of “The Revelation of Jesus Christ” (the final book of the New Testament), only the European “Ten Kings,” yet to arise in world history (Rev. 17:12-17), will destroy Rome with its Vatican City. These “Ten Kings” will destroy Rome with “fire” (17:16), fire generated by the weapons of the “Ten Kings.” Thus, Rome will be destroyed by man-made fire after the final Roman Papal Caesar/”Seventh King” of the Revived Roman Empire (European Union) is murdered, then restored to life to be the “Eighth King,”—the Man-Beast/the Antichrist (Rev. 13:3-10). Until that time, Rome and thus Vatican City are indestructible. The destruction and incineration of “the Eternal City” by man-made fire will take place immediately after the murdered Pope—given the wound of death by a sword (Rev 13:3, 12, 14)—rises from the dead, then possessed by Satan, to be the Antichrist. Rest assured, the Luciferian/Illuminatus/Freemasonic Black Pope and his Ten Assistants professed of the Fourth Vow have the plan in blueprint, but surely know it cannot be implemented until the beginning of the 42-month reign of the prophesied “risen Vicar of Christ/Vicar of Horus,”—the risen Pope, the risen “Seventh King” turned “Eighth King”—The Man-Beast/Antichrist.

Angels and Demons was written by Dan Brown, an obvious Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor with powerful connections in Hollywood, its most influential organizer in the 1930s having been Knight of Malta Joseph P. Kennedy—the father of the Kennedy Klan. Brown has an inside knowledge of the workings of the papacy and Opus Dei (evidenced by his The Da Vinci Code, another movie featuring actor Tom Hanks—raised a Roman Catholic for the first ten years of his life by his Roman Catholic, Portuguese-American mother), as well as Illuminized Freemasonry. Brown’s theme story for The Da Vinci Code was taken from Holy Blood, Holy Grail authored by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln. As an aside, Baigent is a Roman Catholic Freemason and Grand Officer of the United Grand Lodge of England—thus a subject of Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, first cousin of Dame of Malta Queen Elizabeth II, “princess consort” of Pope Benedict XVI.

user posted image

Angels and Demons was directed by Ron Howard, another high-level, American Freemason with ties to Hollywood since the days he played the part of little boy “Opie Taylor” in “The Andy Griffith Show.” Having also directed the blasphemous The Da Vinci Code (i.e., that the Lord Jesus Christ was not the Son of God, that he never died and rose again—openly Islamic-Koranic/Judaistic-Talmudic Antichrist doctrines (I John 4:1-3), Howard and Hanks may well produce more prophetic movies for their masters, the Jesuits ruling the Vatican serving the false, pagan, White Gentile “Jesus Christ” created by Constantine in 325 AD depicted on the devilish “crucifix.”

user posted image

The plot of the movie Angels and Demons centers around a young Irish priest dressed in a black cassack—giving the appearance that he is a Jesuit, the “Demon” of the movie. Priest Patrick McKenna the Illuminatus, holding the office of “Camerlengo, ” officiates on behalf of murdered Pope Pius XVI, secretly the biological father of McKenna who in fact poisoned his father, the pope. Escaping to reality, the Camerlengo must always be a Cardinal: he oversees the administration of the properties and revenues of the pope’s International Vatican Empire—in other words, the Camerlengo is an agent of the Jesuit Superior General because these properties and revenues belong to the Society of Jesus alone! So the young, Jesuit Camerlengo dressed in black (the Demon), while instructing the red-dressed Cardinals in Conclave deliberating over the election of a new pope (the Angels), must be very entertaining to the top Illuminati Jesuits overseeing the Vatican from Borgo Santo Spirito, their military headquarters in Rome. (Yes, the Jesuit Order is “the Borg” of Star Trek!)

According to the book (not the movie), the Camerlengo, using the name “Janus,” hires “Hassassin” to carry out the murders of four Cardinals preferred for the office of the Pope. “Hassassin” is an Arab Muslim of Middle Eastern descent and openly complains of the murders of his ancestors by the “Crusaders.” The Jesuits have always sported two faces depicted by the two-faced Janus. The Order, given any topic, always has an outward but false policy, while vigorously pursuing a secret but true policy. Thus, the open but false policy of the Illuminati-Jesuit Camerlengo is to save the papacy, while his secret but true policy is to destroy it—identical to the policies of the Illuminati- Society of Jesus!

user posted image

But “Janus” and “Hassassin” may have reference to a future plot of infamy! Could the “Hassassin” of the book (not the movie) Angels and Demons (released in 2000) refer to the future Nidal Hasan who would assassinate 14 people (including the baby in the womb of one of the victims) at Fort Hood Army Base in Texas on Jesuit Assassin Guy Fawkes Day—November 5, 2009? Could the two-faced “Janus” who hired “Hassassin” be none other than Vice President Joseph Biden, the “Irish Camerlengo” and successor to the abominable Dick Cheney here in the U.S., Biden holding honorary degrees from two Jesuit Universities in Pennsylvania? Since Hasan was on President Obama’s transition team within the Department of Homeland (”Romeland”) Security, could it be that the White Irish-American Roman Catholic Joseph Biden—serving as the “two-faced Camerlengo” for Pope Benedict XVI in the U.S. (as well as the “alter ego” of Freemasonic-Muslim U.S. President, Barack Davis Obama)—was the mastermind behind Hasan’s mass-murder of U.S. troops at Fort Hood? Was not Hasan, like “Hassassin,” of Arab Middle Eastern descent who complained of the killing of Arab Iraqi people by the American “Crusaders?” The parallels are striking and worth investigating by the Department of Justice—a DOJ unbridled by the Jesuits of Georgetown University!

user posted image

user posted image

The movie Angels and Demons begins with the theft of “anti-matter” produced by a laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva, has been under Jesuit rule since no later than 1850. Expelled from Switzerland in 1847 for fomenting a Civil War against the Protestants, the Order regained its supremacy shortly thereafter. As of 1878, the Coat of Arms of Geneva has included part of the seal of the Jesuit General—”IHS.” Thus, we understand why Geneva is one of Europe’s foremost banking cities, and why Switzerland is virtually immune to any continental war. The pope’s bodyguard protecting the Sovereign State of Vatican City is recruited from Switzerland and titled “the Swiss Guard,” also prominent in the movie.

The plot unfolds with Langdon on the “Path of Illumination” which involve four religious sites where the four kidnapped Cardinals—one of the four men preferred to replace the late pope—are to be murdered. Each Cardinal is branded with the name of one of the four elements of Greek mythology in this order: “earth,” “wind,” “fire” and “water.” At the first location, the first Cardinal is murdered with dirt forced into his mouth symbolizing “earth”—while having been branded on the chest with the word “earth” in gothic lettering. The second Cardinal at the second location will be stabbed in the lungs symbolizing “wind”—branded with the word “wind” on his chest. The third Cardinal at the third location is suspended over a fire, eventually falling into the flame—with the word “fire” branded on his chest. And the fourth Cardinal, bound and gagged, is pushed into a fountain at the fourth location symbolizing “water”—with “water” branded on his chest, but he (according to the movie and not the book) is saved from death in a moment of time by Professor Robert Langdon!

user posted image

The four Illuminati sites are most important as they relate to the history of the Jesuit Order—and its master artist, Gian Lorenzo Bernini! On excellent terms with Jesuit Superior General John Paul Oliva and having crafted the bust of King Louis XIV of France—the Order’s “Sun King” and mass-murderer of the Protestant Calvinist Huguenots, Bernini’s works are to be found at all four locations! The first location is Chigi Chapel in which the movie portrays a winged statue, half man/half beast. That statue foretells the coming of the “Man-Beast” of Revelation 13:3-10, “The Antichrist” of I John 2:18. In the chapel are two of Bernini’s works: the sculpture “Habakkuk and the Angel,” and the facial medallion added to the Egyptian pyramid on the tomb of Vatican banker Agustino Chigi. Thus, this first location for murder is couched in Illuminati-Jesuit artistry.

user posted image
user posted image

The second location for Illuminati-Jesuit ritual murder on the “Path of Illumination” is St. Peter’s Square—that occult design laid out by Jesuit Bernini. But the murder takes place at the “West Ponente”—West Point—in the Square and the Cardinal who is murdered is a Black man. Could it be that the Jesuits directing the plot of the movie injected this detail to indicate the fall of the West—the U.S.—and the extermination all 60,000,000 Blacks therein? Again, the murder of this Black Cardinal transpires in Jesuit Bernini’s St. Peter’s Square.

user posted image

The third location on “The Path of Jesuit Illumination” is the Cornaro Chapel within the small basilica church in Rome, Santa Maria della Vittoria. Therein is Jesuit Bernini’s sculpture titled “Ecstasy of St. Theresa,” she, according to some recent critics, experiencing “a toe-curling orgasm.” It is in the fire of sexual passion the third Cardinal is burned alive, sacrificed to “fire.”

user posted image

The fourth location discovered by Professor Langdon is the Piazza Novona. In its midst is the “Fountain of the Four Rivers” also designed by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Bernini! The monument speaks to the world united under the rule of the Pope—the final Pope, murdered and risen from the dead to be the risen “Horus,” the promised Babylonian Messiah. The rivers are the Nile (South), the Danube (North), the Ganges (East) and the Rio del Plata (West).

Obviously, all four locations of Langdon’s “Path of Illumination” is dominated by the art of Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Gian Bernini. The foremost Baroque artifacts in Rome are all made by the hand of the demon-possessed Bernini at the direction of the Jesuits ruling the papacy in the 1650s.

But there is one more giveaway proving the Society of Jesus is the “Illuminati” of Angels and Demons. The “Path of Illumination” ends where? at none other than the Castle of St. Angelo—the monument to the incarceration of Jesuit Superior General Lorenzo Ricci. For it was here the “Father General” was imprisoned after the Company was suppressed and extinguished with a papal Bull in 1773 by Pope Clement XIV. It was here General Ricci, after decreeing the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati by Adam Weishaupt, gave his final orders before he perished in 1775—the very year our Protestant and Baptist-Calvinist, Bible-based American Revolution commenced! It is here, the Castle of St. Angelo, that was the end of the road for the master of the Jesuit Illuminati in 1775.


I'm Still here having Hope

Some people want to audit the FED. Bernanke and the bankers are disagreeing with this policy. Ben Bernanke head the FED now. Bernanke wrote to the pro-CIA Washington Post, that: "...These measures are very much out of step with the global consensus on the appropriate role of central banks, and they would seriously impair the prospects for economic and financial stability in the United States..." Bernanke supported the central banking system and globalism when he had a testimoney to the Senate panel on his renomination. He wants to serve a 2nd four year term as a FED leader. Barney Frank is the chariman of the House Financial Services Committee. He is a banskter, who tried to derail efforts to audit the FED. He failed. The proposal to audit the Fed's monetary policy deliberations won a committee vote recently over Frank's objections. Of course Bernanke claimed that the FED misked risky behavior, but the FED helped to enact instruments to prevent the economic meltdown from being much worse than it is presently. The FED in fact influenced greatly financial crises. The FED was created in the Jekyll Island meeting off the coast of Georgia in 1910 (with planners like J.P. Morgan, the Rothschild agents, John D. Rockefeler, the Warburgs, etc.). The 1913 U.S. Federal Reserve bank was created as a result of that secret meeting. Even Freemason Charles Lindbergh on the midnight passage of the Federal Reserve Act admitted that: "From now on, depressions will be scientifically created." The FED used irresponsible speculation by expanding money supply by 625 between 1923 and 1929. The Great Depression came about later after those disastrous policies. The depression wasn't accidential, but a contrived occurence according to Congressman Louis McFadden. McFadden was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee. He said that the international banks wanted to have a condition of panic, so they can rule society more. In March of 1929, Paul Warburg issued a tip that the scientifically created crash was coming. Before it did, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Joseph P. Kennedy, and other banksters got out of the market. Later, these same bankers meet in Bretton Woods, New Hamsphire. This was when they help to plot the formation of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. These 2 organization have corruption and force debt on billions of people worldwide. President Nixon in 1971 signed an executive order to stop the U.S. from redeeming its paper dollars for gold. The gold standard was ended. Now, Bernanke is trying to support the FED when it has been involved in manipulating credit from the Great Depression, etc. The FED is trying to support itself when it has been involved in stealing public assets, resources, and creating a feudalism economic system. Communist China's totalitarianism is similar to a feudal system as well. Some elites want a world government and if the dollar is destroyed, a world reserve currency could be in its place. As for Congress, Bernanke needs to read Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. Congress shall have exclusive power to “coin Money, regulate the Value thereof,” not a criminal cartel of monopoly men who dream of a prison planet.

The Italian government of Prime Silvio Berlusconi blocks a deady abortion drug since he wants to seek a safety review. The drug was approved by the AIFA or the Italian pharmaceutical authority, which is similar to the FDA in America. This drug is an abortion drug. The drug killed at least 13 women worldwide and injured more than 1,100 women in the United States alone as of 2006. This drug called mifepristone kills unborn children and kills or injures women as well. The RU 486 abortion drugs has been approved for use up to 7 weeks into pregnancy and only in hospitals. Yet, today, the London Times show that the Senate health commission suspended its used and asked the government's health ministry for a review of its safey. The commission said that the drug could harm women and may violate the nation's abortion laws. Italy legalized abortion in 1978. When that was done, its decision only included surgical abortion, not the one that can be done with the mifepristone pill. The decision came under fire from Anna Finocchiaro. She is the leader in the Senate of the opposition liberal Democratic Party, who claimed the government wants to ban the abortion drug entirely. "Instead of admitting what they really want, they're hiding behind a lot of chatter," she said. The previous Italian government in uly made Italy the latest to sell the abortion drug. The AIFA or the Italian Pharmaceuticals Agency announced the decision that, after a 2 year review process, the abortion drug can be sold under the name Mifegyne. The French drug company called Exelgyn had sought permission to sell the abortion drug in Italy. Livia Turco is the former Health minister who pushed the drug in Italy after she replaced Health Minister Francesco Storace, who was able to halt the RU 486 abortion drug trials temporality. He was able to do so, citing the law and the fact that some of the women using the abortion drugs (in trials) were having abortions at home rather than in hospitals. Abortions in Italy have been declining, dropping from 234,801 abortions in 1982 to 136,715 in 2004 but pro-life advocates would like to drive that number down even further. Like always, abortion is evil and murder.

The Jesus Seminar is getting more New Age. The Jesus Seminar is about liberal theological leaders denying much if not most of what the New Testament says about Jesus Christ. So, they have councils and meetings to find new ways to not only question the Bible, but question or deny many of the core tenets of Christianity (from the virgin birth, the resurrection, Jesus' existence even, etc. The Bible is clear is that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is a core tenet of Christianity. If you deny the resurrection, you can't be a Christian period). They promote apostasy. Lloyd Geering written a new book that wants people to depart from the faith, which was once delivered unto the saints according to Jude 1:3. The Jesus Seminar supports Geerings book. The endorsement of Geering’s book on the Jesus Seminar website says, ‘The mainline churches in the Western world are declining ... because they are all out of step with the modern secular world. ... the churches reveal a lack of faith by insisting on an infallible Bible and a set of unchangeable doctrines tailored to an obsolete worldview” (, November 6, 2009). This is disrespect by that Seminar of course. Geering's book is called "Coming Back to Earth." Geering wants people to complete the work of the Second Axial Age. This nothing wrong than promoting a new age to achieve "a global consciousness." He believes that God is present in us and life itself. This is false since God created the Universe, but God isn't all in us or in all creation. God is seperate from his creation. Brethren, apostasy and unbelief is widespread and it seems the world is rushing recklessly toward its demise, so ‘... abide in him; that, when he shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before him at his coming’ (1 John 2:28).” The Bible is clear that God is personal towards us humans, but man can't be God or evolve into a god. The Second Axial age is nothing more than a veiled promotion of the new world order or the new age.

Jesuits have a huge role in world history. One famous Jesuit agent was David Ferrie. He was educated at St. Mary's Seminary. He was preparing for the priesthood and was educated by the Jesuits. He was trained by Jesuits at St. Ignatius High School and was the Bishop of the Old Orthodox Catholic Church. He had connections to Loyola University. He is pictured with military intelligence agent Lee Harvey Oswald. He has been connected to the New Orleans Mafia don Carlos Marcello. Some researchers accuse him of having a role in the Kennedy assassination, because Ferrie thought that JFK was to lax on Communism. Ferrie didn't realize that Communism is a front of the corporate bankers utilized in order to control much of of the Third World (and centralize wealth more since communism isn't about helping the people. It's about deprive individual liberty while centralizing wealth into a collective, government run institution). Ferrie was an anti-Castro militant. He was a member of the CIA-backed Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front. Ferrie was an ally of W. Guy Bannister, who was a JBS member, a Minuteman, and a Scottish Rite Freemason according to some people. Bannister was apart of the Chicago FBI and was a former agent of the ONI or the Office of Naval Intelligence. H. L. Hunt was apart of the CNP and was a Knight of Malta according to Josh Reeves. Ferrie was in the Civil Air Patrol (Ferrie was involved in the Bay of Pigs operation and was involved in Bannister's anti-Castro training of people with the CIA), which he used to acquaint himself with young boys and recruit them. Oswald was in his Civil Air Patrol unit. The Civil Air Patrol was founded by D.H. Byrd, who also, coincidence I'm sure, owned the Texas School Book Depository at the time of the assassination. Richard Bartholomew suggested that Byrd knew Ferrie. His Jesuit links are easy to prove. JFK oppose the Vatican/Jesuit crusade in Vietnam and wanted canon law to not superior to the U.S. Constitution in America. A "former" Jesuit Ottmar Edenhofer is involved in promoting the climate change hysteria movement.

Climategate has been exposed by many quarters, but not that much by the mainstream media. Lord Christopher Monckton want the United Nations to be shut down and Al Gore to be arrested. The cliamge change scam has been exposed in 2009 like in no other time in history. He said that these eco-extremists who are threatening to shut down economies, bankrupt nations, and deepen the problems of the third world by implementing draconian policies in the name of global warming should be indicted, prosecuted and imprisoned “for a very long time." “The fraudsters and racketeers from Al Gore to the people at the University of East Anglia who have been making their fortune at the expense of taxpayers and the little guy,” should be criminally charged, said Monckton, in response to the climategate scandal. “We the people have got to rise up worldwide, found a party in every country which stands for freedom and make sure we fight this bureaucratic communistic world government monster to a standstill – they shall not pass,” he added. Monckton said that the U.N. should be closed. He talked to a senior UN ambassador in Canada who told him the the UN has no purpose anymore and it exists to enrich itself at the expense of the nation it serves (He wants the U.N. to end). Monckton believes that billions of dollars would be saved if the United Nations was shut down ending this controversial bureaucracy. The emails involved in climategate prove that global warming alarmism was publicly shown, but behind closed doors, these scientists admitted that their information was suspect (plus they level people like Monckton as correct). So, the science isn't settled, natural climate change is bigger than man's intervention, and eras in world history have been warmer than today. Monckton criticized the science czar John P. Holdren as promoting a planetary regime, and other drocanian population measures as found in his 1997 book of Ecoscience. Monckton exposed how Holdren promoted global cooling alarmism in the 70s and how he believes in man-made global warming. The elite use global warming as an excuse to promote population control without care to how many folks die. It's about controlling governments instead of solving real environmental issues. Monckton was the former advisor to Margaret Thatcher. He wants a worldwide freedom party to promote national sovereignity, promote freedom, have democracy, and oppose communism. He said that said that the warmists were sounding more and more desperate and knew that they had been rumbled as a result of climategate, which would only make it more urgent for them to try and force through a binding treaty in Copenhagen. “Every time these people try to take it away, we in the freedom party will stop them, and I think now is the time,” said Monckton. So, people like Monckton are once again vindicated about global warming hysteria.

Regardless of life problems and circumstances, I still have hope in God and the improvements people can bring in our environment.

By Timothy

Cindy Sheehan

Pro-Life Group Files Complaint Against Alberto Hodari in Forced Abortion Case

The Esoteric Interpretation of The Black Eyed Peas’ “Meet Me Halfway” (A Must Read)

Planned Parenthood Thanksgiving Dinner Conversation Guide: Promote Abortion


Planned Parenthood Thanksgiving Dinner Conversation Guide: Promote Abortion

by Steven Ertelt Editor
November 25, 2009

addthis_pub = 'sertelt';

Email RSS Print
Washington, DC ( -- When Americans gather around their dinner tables with friends and family tomorrow to celebrate Thanksgiving, they will catch up on the latest family chatter and probably talk about sports and the weather. But, Planned Parenthood's president has a suggestion for those who need a topic for discussion.
In an email today to supporters of the abortion business, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards unveiled her own Thanksgiving dinner conversation guide.
"I don't know how things are at your Thanksgiving table, but in my house we don't just make small talk," she writes, saying she is "committed to having real conversations" that invariably turn to abortion. It is Thanksgiving "conversations like these that help" promote her pro-abortion agenda, she says, suggesting that abortion advocates follow her lead.

"If your family is anything like mine, you'll want to be prepared to converse thoughtfully. Here's some help — a guide to dinner table conversation," Richards says.
Richards links to a Planned Parenthood web page urging members to help their family "avoid dirty politics by sticking to these points. If 'turkey talk' turns to health care reform, stand ready -- we've got you covered."
The page lists several talking points on the topic of abortion funding in health care that covers the Stupak amendment added to the House government-run bill to remove abortion funding and the phony Capps amendment Harry Reid put in the Senate bill to include massive abortion funding in it.
"If Uncle Bill wants to debate, here are a few points he will have a tough time responding to: Stupak amounts to nothing less than an unacceptable 'middle-class abortion ban,'" Planned Parenthood advises saying. "If this bill becomes law, millions of middle class women will be prohibited from buying, through the exchange, private insurance that covers abortion, a legal medical procedure."

The Planned Parenthood page urges activists to tell their family that some members of the House who supported the Stupak amendment are experiencing "buyer's remorse" and that "President Obama has indicated the Stupak goes too far."
"Members of Congress have been saying in public interviews that they didn't realize the impact of Stupak before they voted for this proposal. Now that they have come to fully appreciate the impact of the Stupak ban, they are indicating that Stupak went to far," it continues.
The Thanksgiving dinner conversation suggestion page urges activists to tell their family that health care reform "must include abortion" and that "Planned Parenthood must be part of the Exchange."
Richards says the conversation guide is great for responding to occasions where "Aunt Gladys asks you questions," but given polls showing most Americans oppose being forced to pay for abortions under their health care plan, Richards's suggestions for answer may give Americans an upset stomach.

Buzz up!

Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

Search Engines Censoring ClimateGate?


Search Engines Censoring ClimateGate?

Or an inside job attempt at preventing Brooker story from going viral?

Paul Joseph Watson
Monday, November 30, 2009

A fantastic article written by Christopher Brooker of the London Telegraph exposing the climate change fraud rocketed to the very top of a Google News search for “global warming,” only to disappear hours later.
“What is going on at Google? I only ask because last night when I typed “Global Warming” into Google News the top item was Christopher Booker’s superb analysis of the Climategate scandal,” writes James Delingpole.
“It’s still the most-read article of the Telegraph’s entire online operation – 430 comments and counting – yet mysteriously when you try the same search now it doesn’t even feature. Instead, the top-featured item is a blogger pushing Al Gore’s AGW agenda. Perhaps there’s nothing sinister in this. Perhaps some Google-savvy reader can enlighten me.”
Another blogger noted how other versions of the article appeared, but the original had been “disappeared,” despite the fact that other London Telegraph articles showed up as the top ranked result when entering their headline.
“That is using the search string: “Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation” – which is the full headline of the piece. It shows up where it has been quoted in full by other sites, but of the Booker column there is no sign,” writes Richard North.
In addition, searches for previous Christopher Brooker articles show up as top links – it’s only this particular article that has seemingly been targeted for censorship.
The same de-listing of the article is evident on other major search engine websites like Bing and Yahoo.

Despite the fact that Google has been caught gaming its search results in the past, this is more likely an “inside job” as it were.
It appears as if one of the editors at the Telegraph has gone into the backend of the Telegraph content management system and checked an option that prevents search engines from indexing a particular article.

“My guess is that this isn’t a Google issue. The problem probably lies closer to home – there looks to be an enemy in the camp, who has probably been using this, or something like it,” writes North, referring to a code that is inserted into a web page in order to block it from being ’spidered’. This is sometimes done to prevent site ripping and other hacks, but it also has the effect of barring search engines from being able to list the page in their results.
The fact that this has been applied to just this one article suggests that some higher-up at the Telegraph from the warmist camp was concerned about how the article had gone viral and wanted to contain its spread.
The fact that this attempt at sabotage has become a story within itself will probably only mean Brooker’s article will be read by more people, so the whole ruse has backfired.

Justice -- At Last -- For Cory Maye? November 19, 2009

Anti-Abortion Group Protests Outside Concord School

Who was Sir Isaac Newton?

Sunday, November 29, 2009

A Call to Action: Stop the Climate Scientific Global Dictatorship

Senator Levin Perpetuates Lies About Afghanistan Invasion

The Devastating Truth About the Obama Health Plan


The Devastating Truth About the Obama Health Plan
Text size

Jon Rappoport
November 29, 2009

We are at a defining and crucial moment in our history. A machine is in motion that will alter our future. If after you read this article, you agree with its main points, or at least feel they need to be heard, send it on to others. Find ways to make your voice count.

Under the Obama Plan, it will be very convenient to declare new pandemics every few seasons.

It is one thing to read and understand the details of the Obama Health Plan. It is another thing to grasp the kind of power this bill will create, and what that power, in the future, will mean and do.

I realize that many people reading this essay have no interest in alternative medicine. However, that field represents freedom of choice for millions of Americans, and if you want to deny that choice—because you have a mistaken notion about, and a misplaced faith in, how medical science actually operates—the medical facts I describe and cite below should bring about a new appreciation of what freedom looks like, and how important the job of protecting it is.

This might be the most important medical article I’ve ever written, and in 20 years as a reporter, I’ve written many.

As I begin this essay on Thanksgiving morning, I recall that, 15 years ago, I was preparing to challenge Henry Waxman for his seat in the US House, in the 29th District, Los Angeles. At that time, the issue was Health Freedom, the right of every American to choose how to maintain and improve his/her health. And here I am again, with the same issue—only this time, there is a gargantuan White House program in place to destroy that freedom from the top down.

And various alternative-health advocates, having lost their minds, are supporting it. Among them are people who actually believe the small affirmative nods from politicians, in the direction of alternative medicine, are signaling an enlightened age under the Obama Star.

Duped again. One more time.

I have never imagined Democrats or Republicans represented the American people. This time, it is the political Left, with their naïve belief in “science” and “humanitarian work” who are leading the country over a cliff.

In the same way climate-change researchers have recently been exposed as charlatans, manipulators, and elitists, the medical establishment has been laid open and flayed—only the revelations came nine years ago. And of course, the major media refused to chase down that story and shine a light on the criminals.

On July 26, 2000, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a landmark paper by Barbara Starfield (Johns Hopkins School of Public Health), “Is US health really the best in the world?” In it, Starfield revealed what many people inside the medical establishment already knew: every year, like clockwork, the medical system was killing huge numbers of people. This wasn’t a dream. It was too real. By all rights (but who cares about rights?) the game was up. The liars and the PR flacks and the public health agencies were going down. The drug companies were going to take a lethal blow. Hospitals all over America were going to have to confess their many sins. Of course, that never happened.

Each year in the US there are:

12,000 deaths from unnecessary surgeries;

7,000 deaths from medication errors in hospitals;

20,000 deaths from other errors in hospitals;

80,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospitals;

106,000 deaths from FDA-approved correctly prescribed medicines.

The total of medically-caused deaths in the US every year is 225,000.

This makes the medical system the third leading cause of death in America, behind heart disease and cancer.

In the wake of Starfield’s devastating report, other facts came to light: 2.1 million people in America, every year, are hospitalized as a result of reactions to FDA-approved medicines. Annually, 36 million serious adverse reactions to those drugs occur.

So, inclusive health coverage for many more Americans under the Obama Plan—with business as usual—means these horrendous figures will rise.

This is the dirty secret. This is what the political Left in this country, those avid defenders of “medical science,” must pretend isn’t there at all. And the Republicans are in the same position.

Obama and his allies are promoting a medical system that is the third leading cause of death in America. It’s that stark and it’s that simple.

This is where we begin, if we are to understand the Obama Plan.

The Plan involves appointing an “expert panel” to decide what treatments Americans should be given for what diseases, under the new regime.

Only a certified idiot would assume that, over time, alternative non-mainstream therapies would survive such an ongoing vetting. Hope may spring eternal, but common sense makes it easy to grasp the realities on the ground.

Alternative therapies will die out. They will be edged out. Those that remain will be permitted for a narrow range of conditions, or as adjuncts to standard drug treatments and surgery.

Chiropractors and acupuncturists, who are temporarily basking in the notion that Obama “really cares,” are in for a very rude awakening down the line. Their careers and practices will be significantly reduced. Not today, not tomorrow, but it will happen. Perhaps these practitioners only fret about the short-term. Perhaps they’re simply looking for a few scraps from the table as long as the meal lasts.

Veteran health and medical journalist Peter Chowka points out ( that Americans who want to take responsibility for their own health, who don’t want onerous medical insurance, would be drafted into the Plan, and they would pay for it. With no escape possible, their discretionary incomes would shrink, and many of them would no longer be able to buy the healthiest foods and the supplements they use to prevent illness.

This is another avenue along which alternative health would approach a dead-end.

There is also the strong possibility that doctors, under the Plan, will be telling patients they may not take nutritional supplements while in treatment. This will assume the status of an irreversible edict. In certain cases, “while in treatment” means years.

What happens to a person, conscripted into the mandated Plan, who is told by his doctor that he should/must receive a vaccine? Suppose this person says no? What are the consequences? Isn’t his refusal tantamount to saying he wants out from under the Umbrella? Will he then be labeled a defector? What penalties will he suffer?

Does a diagnosis of cancer imply a patient must submit to chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery? Can these treatments be forced upon him?

Perhaps, in the early days of the Plan, nothing untoward will happen. But then, as time passes, and the system assumes tighter and tighter controls, the hand of government will close around the recalcitrant patient’s neck.

Doctors, who are an integral part of the Plan, will surely be punished if they give unapproved (alternative) treatments to patients. Their licenses will be stripped.

And in order to make the Plan operate on a day-to-day basis, the records and bookkeeping data of every health-care practitioner in America will eventually be tracked on government computer networks.

Every person in America will have a traceable medical ID package. There is no way around it. The monitoring apparatus can’t work without it.

Orwellian consequences lie up the road in the field of psychiatric practice. In case you hadn’t noticed, the invention of “disorders” by committee is the preferred method for “discovering” more and more mental illnesses. Fairy-tale figures are thrown about by the American Psychiatric Association: 20% of Americans are clinically depressed; millions of children have ADHD and need a cheap form of speed called Ritalin.

To secure the future of the Global Village, people everywhere must agree that mental illness is no longer a stigma-label. Yet, the science is completely fraudulent. For evidence, consult the many works of psychiatrist Peter Breggin, who has done more than any other person to expose the guts of his own profession. Breggin establishes that mental disorders cannot be authoritatively diagnosed by a chemical or biological test. Conclusive tests do not exist. And worse, in this undefined and arbitrary territory, the drugs that follow diagnoses are killers. For example, 300,000 cases of motor brain damage, as a result of the administration of major tranquilizers.

Under the Obama Plan, you can bet your bottom dollar that psychiatric care will eventually become mandatory. A patient suddenly diagnosed with clinical depression or bipolar disease will be told he must take the drugs—and suffer their adverse effects.

Science will take a back seat to a “share and care” collectivist philosophy, in which the so-called mental health of the individual is said to improve the group, the community, the nation. Under this cover, the attack on the individual personality will expand. Very young children will be given more and more debilitating and dangerous brain drugs.

These are no Luddite predictions. This is about hard fact, and those who shy away from the psychiatric literature and its fraudulent pretensions are whistling in the dark, pretending they are humanitarians of the first order.

Under the Obama Plan, it will be very convenient to declare new pandemics every few seasons, because these phony non-epidemics provide an opportunity to herd the sheep into clinics and remind them who is running the show. The United States will eventually become a Medical State, and lessons will have to be imparted on training wheels: go here, take this vaccine; go there, take that drug; the epidemic is endangering the herd, and you must help your brothers and sisters.

These are the figures on the last several “epidemics.” They are not yearly; they are totals, to date; global totals, except in the case of West Nile (US only):

SARS: 774 deaths.

WEST NILE: 1159 deaths.

BIRD FLU: 262 deaths.

SMALLPOX: (terrorist threat): 0 deaths.

SWINE FLU: 7909 deaths.

To give perspective, 250 thousand to 500 thousand people die of ordinary flu-like illness every year.

Yet this astounding death rate accrues no interest as an epidemic. It is only the “teaching (brainwashing) moments” of the phony epidemics that are promoted by health agencies (e.g., CDC and WHO) and their pharmaceutical allies, who rake in billions by manufacturing new vaccines.

Yes, under the Obama Plan, there will be more declared health emergencies, and they will serve to cement the citizen to his new role as eternal patient in the medical march along bleak streets of the future.

Can you perceive the loss of individual freedom implicit in this universal system of health control, and can you see how the present bill before Congress is the gateway?

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Do what you can to defeat the bill, and d__ the torpedoes and syringes.

If you believe the US medical system is a beautiful thing in all its parts, and you want in, consider that other human beings don’t. You can have your wish, and you can help guarantee that your fellow citizens, who decline, can have theirs, too.

This country tends to run on slogans, and “healthcare for all” is the punch line being used to spread the word of a new era. But slogans don’t inform, they persuade. We’re at a moment when we need to see through the lie. The consequences are dire. The fake saints and prophets and their followers are preaching a message that contains a bomb.

Vast public ignorance about the US medical cartel and its true human effects is the delivery system for that bomb.


Sources and comments: I’m fully aware that people reading the facts in this essay will be shocked, and they will have doubts. Here are the sources for those facts. Things are not what they seem.

Barbara Starfield, “Is US health really the best in the world?” JAMA, July 26, 2000. Contains statistics on medically-caused deaths in the US.

On January 8, 2001, the LA Times ran a piece by Linda Marsa on the effects of medical drugs in the US. Predictably, the story sank like a stone. It provoked no Congressional hearings, no arrests.

The article described, in a few key paragraphs, a world of trouble. Adverse medical events. From med drugs.

“A 1998 University of Toronto study found that roughly 100,000 Americans die of adverse [medical-drug] reactions each year, and 2.1 million more are hospitalized.”

Marsa offered, in her Times article, a quote from an associate professor of medicine at Harvard, Dr. David Bates, an author of a 2000 study on drug effects. The study found that “18 percent of patients complained of drug-related complications…” Marsa wrote.

Here is the quote from Dr. Bates: “People often have [drug-caused] symptoms for months, but they’re either reluctant to let their doctor know or they weren’t sure if they just felt lousy…But these numbers translate to 36 million adverse drug events per year.”

Marsa dug out an explanation offered for this horrendous stat by the then-commissioner of the FDA, David Kessler.

Here’s Kessler’s quote from the Times article: “‘If an adverse event occurs in perhaps one in 5,000 or even one in 1,000 users, it could be missed in a clinical trial but pose a serious safety problem when released in the market,’ noted former FDA Commissioner David A Kessler in a 1993 JAMA article.”

Kessler was trying to explain (away) 100,000 deaths and 2.1 million hospitalizations and 36 million adverse reactions PER YEAR from FDA APPROVED DRUGS. He failed dismally. He seemed to be saying, “We can’t do any better.” If true, then Kessler and his colleagues should have abandoned the Agency and sought work elsewhere.

To add up the death totals from recent phony epidemics:

SARS—See WHO “Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003” (based on data as of Dec.31, 2003).

BIRD FLU—See WHO “Confirmed Human Cases of Avian Influenza A (H5N1)” (24 September 2009)

WEST NILE—See CDC, West Nile Virus, Statistics, Surveillance, and Control. Years are reported separately, 1999-2009. I included only US cases because I couldn’t find a good source for global cases.

To confirm that every year, between 250,000 and 500,000 people die from ordinary flu, see WHO Fact Sheet No.211, Influenza (Seasonal).

Read Dr. Peter Breggin’s classic, Toxic Psychiatry, St. Martin’s Press, 1991. Follow Breggin’s argument, through several chapters, that labeled mental disorders are not based on factual biological evidence, and see p.89-91 for evidence that at least 300,000 people are suffering from brain damage (tardive dyskinesia) as a result of being administered major tranquilizers.

Under the centralized Obama Plan, control of the US medical system will fall into the hands of several powerful groups. The FDA, for decades a foe of alternative medicine, will increase its stranglehold on the nutritional-supplement market. Over time, it will enact tighter rules concerning what supplements may be sold to consumers and under what conditions. It will close down more alternative clinics. The Department of Health and Human Services will assume greater power over the states, and those states which now allow wide latitude to alternative health practitioners will be squeezed. The pharmaceutical industry, through its vast political connections, will accelerate its strategies to impoverish, bankrupt, and take over nutritional-supplement companies and gain control of that multi-billion-dollar market.

These trends will not necessarily be reflected in the laws governing the US medical-insurance plan, but those laws will create greater centralization, which translates into a pipeline of force for the major players.

Even a casual observer of the psychiatric landscape realizes that diagnoses of mental disorders are on the full upswing. The American Psychiatric Association, a wholly owned subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry, will continue to exploit the mental-health market and enable the labeling of the majority of Americans with at least one mental disorder. That would be a target goal for Big Pharma. Again, this is not about credible science. It’s about business.

Founded in 1992, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), a minor bureau of the National Institutes of Health (a federal agency), has managed to derail, stall, and divert the progress of real alternative medicine. It has forwarded no breakthroughs. It has bogged itself down in conferences, reports, and committee deliberations. It has fooled a number of so-called alternative-health advocates into believing that the federal government supports non-mainstream health strategies.

Imagine what will happen when healthcare in this country becomes centralized to a much greater degree under the Obama Plan. If this one tiny agency, NCCAM, can now befuddle the alternative field with a collection of inept and self-seeking bureaucrats, gargantuan power held at the top of the federal government will make that diversion look like a raindrop in a hurricane.

The modern medical system has always utilized PR to make its case to the public. Such efforts, under a federally run health system, will intensify by a factor of a hundred, a thousand. Its themes will run the gamut: toxic chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery for all cancers, even when the science confesses these treatments are useless and life-destroying; more vaccines for childhood illnesses, even though unvaccinated children experience these illnesses and emerge with natural immunity to them; unnecessary and damaging hysterectomies; frequent mammograms that lead to unneeded biopsies and mastectomies; “discoveries” about mental disorders that indicate the (false) need for debilitating drugs over the course of many years, for adults and children…

It’s important to realize that, at the heart of medical PR, success in applying dramatic treatments for emergency-crisis-trauma patients has been exploited, to make it seem that the same degree of success applies over the full range of medical intervention. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The history of the decline of infectious disease is a history of improved sanitation, an alleviation of overcrowding, the rise of the middle class, and above all, the betterment of nutrition. This decline in disease occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread vaccination. Under massively centralized medical care, in an environment where chemically saturated agri-business grows our food in depleted topsoil, there is a greater and greater need for nutritional supplements. But this vital avenue will be narrowed and blocked in the ways I have indicated above.

In my 20 years as a medical reporter, I’ve documented instances in which germs were used as cover stories to explain away illness actually caused by horrendous environmental conditions. This inhuman operation is easy to understand once you realize that some of the leading pharmaceutical firms (which make billions by drugging germs) are also chemical companies (which sell enormous amounts of toxic pesticides) and are also genetic-engineering companies (which develop food seeds that yield crops with lower nutritional values, crops that demand more toxic pesticides to survive, crops whose adverse health effects remain untested).

Under a national medical plan, these companies would be able to assert even more power than they do now. The ease with which environmentally/chemically caused illness could be explained away “as a virus” would be child’s play, because the same people would hold the medical and chemical strings.

Last but not least, medical-research fraud continues unabated, an out-of-control rampant crime. Occasional confessions published in medical journals do not stop the fraud, whose major source is illegitimate pharmaceutical influence. Under a centralized government-run medical monolith, these offenses will become harder to spot and correct, and easier to portray as real science.

See, for example, “20 Percent Of Cancer Studies Report Conflict of Interest,” ScienceDaily (May 13, 2009): “Nearly one-third of cancer research published in high-impact journals disclosed a conflict of interest, according to a new study from researchers at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. The most frequent type of conflict was [pharmaceutical] industry funding of the study, which was seen in 17 percent of papers. Twelve percent of papers had a study author who was an industry employee. Randomized trials with reported conflicts of interest were more likely to have positive findings…”

Also, from the Boston Globe (, “Flaws are found in validating medical studies; many see need to overhaul standards for peer review” (August 15, 2005):

“…after a study that sent reverberations through the medical profession by finding that almost one-third of top research articles have been either contradicted or seriously questioned, some specialists are calling for radical changes in the system…almost one-third of the top papers that appeared in top journals over a 13-year period from 1990 to 2003, had been either contradicted or found to have potentially exaggerated results. All the articles had [prior to publication] undergone vigorous peer review, leading to questions about whether problems should have been caught by reviewers…”

9/11 Pentagon Aircraft Hijack Impossible

Tony Rebukes Vicar

Obama Wants Computer Privacy Ruling Overturned


Obama Wants Computer Privacy Ruling Overturned

Published on 11-27-2009
Email To Friend Print Version

Source: Wired
The Obama administration is seeking to reverse a federal appeals court decision that dramatically narrows the government’s search-and-seizure powers in the digital age.
Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Justice Department officials are asking the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider its August ruling that federal prosecutors went too far when seizing 104 professional baseball players’ drug results when they had a warrant for just 10.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ 9-2 decision offered Miranda-style guidelines to prosecutors and judges on how to protect Fourth Amendment privacy rights while conducting computer searches.
Kagan, appointed solicitor general by President Barack Obama, joined several U.S. attorneys in telling the San Francisco-based court Monday that the guidelines are complicating federal prosecutions in the West. The circuit, the nation’s largest, covers nine states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.
“In some districts, computer searches have ground to a complete halt,” the authorities wrote. “Many United States Attorney’s Offices have been chilled from seeking any new warrants to search computers.” (.pdf)
The government is asking the court to review the case with all of its 27 judges, which it has never done. If the court agrees to a rehearing, a new decision is not expected for years, and the August decision would be set aside pending a new ruling. Either way, the U.S. Supreme Court has the final say.

The controversial decision, which the government said was contrary to Supreme Court precedent, outlined new rules on how the government may search computers. (.pdf)
Ideally, when searching a computer’s hard drive, the government should cull the specific data described in the search warrant, rather than copy the entire drive, the court said. When that is not possible, the authorities must use an independent third party under the court’s supervision, whose job it would be to comb through the files for the specific information, and provide it, and nothing else, to the government, according to the ruling.
The government said the decision was already chilling at least one rape case in Washington State.
“Federal agents received information from their counterparts in San Diego that two individuals had filmed themselves raping a 4-year-old girl and traded the images via the internet,” the government wrote. “The agents did not obtain a warrant to search the suspects’ computers, however, because of concerns that any evidence discovered about other potential victims could not be disclosed by the filter team. The agents therefore referred the case to state authorities.”
The circuit’s ruling came in a case that dates to 2004, when federal prosecutors probing a Northern California steroid ring obtained warrants to seize the results of urine samples of 10 pro baseball players at a Long Beach, California drug-testing facility. The players had been tested as part of a voluntary drug-deterrence program implemented by Major League Baseball.
Federal agents serving the search warrant on the Comprehensive Drug Testing lab wound up making a copy of a directory containing a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with results of every player that was tested in the program. Then, back in the office, they scrolled freely through the spreadsheet, ultimately noting the names of all 104 players who tested positive.
The government argued that the information was lawfully found in “plain sight,” just like marijuana being discovered on a dining room table during a court-authorized weapons search of a home. But the court noted that the agents actively scrolled to the right side of the spreadsheet to peek at all the players test results, when they could easily have selected, copied and pasted only the rows listing the players named in the search warrant.
Four players whose names were seized, and who were not linked to the BALCO investigation, have been leaked to The New York Times. They are Alex Rodriguez, David Ortiz, Manny Ramirez and Sammie Sosa.

Two dissenting judges wrote that the majority was also sidestepping its own precedent in which the circuit court had denied the suppression of child pornography evidence found on a computer during a search for the production of false identification cards pursuant to a valid warrant.
In 2006, the 9th Circuit originally sided with the government in a 2-1 decision, which the court overturned with an 11-judge “en banc” panel in August.

Scientology exploit Churchill

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Terrorist Attack Suspected in Russian Train Crash that Killed 26

America's Secret Past

Audit the Fed: Bernanke and the Bankers Are Running Scared

Aquarius: The Age of Evil (Trailer #3)

A Keith Thompson film revealing the truth about the new world order that you are not meant to see. Glory to the Lord Jesus Christ who's word predicts the coming new world order. This film exposes 2012 as a fraud, Zeitgeist and its connections to the new world order, Theosophy and the new age, coadjutor's who deceive the anti-nwo movement and finally Maitreya, the false Christ whom the new world order seeks to introduce to humanity for the advent of the false Age of Aquarius - the new world order. Glory to the risen Lord Jesus Christ. To the glory of God the Father.

Man Gets Climategate Story Out on CBC

Man Gets Climategate Story Out on CBC
Text size

November 28, 2009

In general, the corporate media has ignored the climategate story. In Europe, Britain, Australia, and elsewhere the corporate media has reported on this important story, but here in the United States it has met mostly with a stony silence.
In Canada, a determined activist interrupted a CBC broadcast with a message demanding the news network report on the climategate story. His message and act should be repeated here in the United States and around the world.
The corporate media cannot be allowed to bury this important story.

Russian Interior Minister Tells Citizens to Fight Back Against Police Brutality

MSM reports on forced abortion but omits abortionist's name; I don't

Pro-aborts gloat as some so-called pro-life groups oppose Nevada personhood initiative

Lord Monckton: Shut Down The UN, Arrest Al Gore


Lord Monckton: Shut Down The UN, Arrest Al Gore
Text size

Paul Joseph Watson
Saturday, November 28, 2009

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show yesterday, Lord Christopher Monckton went further than ever before in his vehement opposition to the elitists running the climate change scam, calling for the UN to be shut down and for fraudulent peddlers of global warming propaganda like Al Gore to be arrested and criminally prosecuted.

Monckton said that those who are threatening to shut down economies, bankrupt nations, and deepen the problems of the third world by implementing draconian policies in the name of global warming should be indicted, prosecuted and imprisoned “for a very long time”.
“The fraudsters and racketeers from Al Gore to the people at the University of East Anglia who have been making their fortune at the expense of taxpayers and the little guy,” should be criminally charged, said Monckton, in response to the climategate scandal.
“We the people have got to rise up worldwide, found a party in every country which stands for freedom and make sure we fight this bureaucratic communistic world government monster to a standstill – they shall not pass,” he added.

Monckton said that the United Nations should be “closed down,” adding that he talked to a senior UN ambassador in Canada who told him that he no longer saw any purpose in the UN and it exists “only to enrich itself at the expense of the nations it claims to serve, it’s time it was brought to an end.”
“We would all save billions if we shut down the UN and just about all of its hideous bureaucracy,” said Monckton.
Lord Monckton emphasized how the emails released as a result of climategate prove that global warming alarmism was still prevalent in public but behind closed doors, warmist scientist are admitting that the “deniers” as they label people like Monckton are correct.
“Publicly they’re saying the science is settled, we’re all doomed unless you close down the economies of the west, whereas privately they’re saying to each other ‘we’ve got it wrong, none of this adds up and it’s a travesty that we can’t explain it’.”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Monckton also slammed Obama’s science czar John P. Holdren, who in his 1977 book Ecoscience called for draconian population measures to be enforced by a “planetary regime” in the name of saving the earth, as an “openly admitted communist”.
Monckton pointed out how Holdren had been once of the most prominent alarmists in the 70’s warning about the onset of rapid “global cooling”.
“Now with seamless mendacity he says that what we’re now facing is global warming,” said Monckton.
“How can anyone like Holdren stand up with a straight face and expect anyone to believe it,” he added.
Monckton said that the agenda behind the global warming movement was to set up a communistic world government which will be run by people who “do not care how many people they kill with their policies” and that their goal is to “do away with democracy forever by stealth using the excuse to save the planet.”

Monckton said that the people running the scam had a “deliberate desire to control population by killing people in large numbers deliberately if necessary.”
The former advisor to Margaret Thatcher said that the warmists were sounding more and more desperate and knew that they had been rumbled as a result of climategate, which would only make it more urgent for them to try and force through a binding treaty in Copenhagen.
Monckton said that the answer to combating the move towards neo-feudalism and global government was to form a worldwide “freedom party” that would operate nationally in every country in order to defend freedom, democracy and prosperity while routing out every aspect of the communistic takeover.
“Every time these people try to take it away, we in the freedom party will stop them, and I think now is the time,” said Monckton.

Back from the USA

Making a Difference


Hollywood imagery and symbolism

Friday, November 27, 2009

The New Age

Roger Morneau's Testimony

Roger Morneau was involved in demon worship, lived in that world for many months, and escaped alive. He is able to give us inside information about it. It does not conform with popular notes of who parttakes and what the activities are. Roger was elected to be a member of an elite group of demon worshipers. When he was about to be permanently initiated he asked for help from higher powers to leave it alive. Interview with the famous author of the book titled the same

Other News

American Suspect Eyed In Mumbai Attack, Might Be A CIA Double Agent

Major Corporations Control European Union

Sarkozy Gets Polanski Released from Swiss Prison

Senator Wants to Know if the Dead Osama will be Read Miranda Rights


Senator Wants to Know if the Dead Osama will be Read Miranda Rights
Text size

Kurt Nimmo
November 27, 2009

New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez wants to put a dead man on trial in a U.S. civilian court. Menendez has told CNSNews that Osama bin Laden should be brought to justice and prosecuted in civilian court, where he will most certainly be convicted.
“When we catch bin Laden, should he be Mirandized? Should he be read his Miranda rights? If there’s going to be a civil proceeding, the attorney general said it wouldn’t matter,” Matt Cover of CNSNews asked Menendez.
“As far as I’m concerned he should be prosecuted, brought to justice, and hopefully – and I fully expect – convicted,” declared Menendez.

Sen. Graham blasts Attorney General Holder over 9/11 trial decision.
CNSNews asked the question after Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina grilled Obama’s attorney general on how the administration would handle terrorists caught in the future. “If we captured bin Laden tomorrow, would he be entitled to Miranda warnings at the moment of capture?” said Graham.
Eric Holder wasn’t sure how to answer Graham’s question. He said it “all depends” if Osama bin Laden would be read his Miranda rights. Holder’s apparent confusion is rather perplexing coming from the top cop in the country.
Graham understands the law better than Obama’s attorney general. “Well, it does not depend,” Graham replied. “If you’re going to prosecute anybody in civilian court, our law is clear that the moment custodial interrogation occurs, the defendant – the criminal defendant – is entitled to a lawyer and to be informed of their right to remain silent.”
Not that Graham believes accused terrorists deserve a day in court. He believes Holder is guilty of “making bad history” in his decision to send Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his supposed co-conspirators to New York for trial in civilian court.
“We’re making bad history here,” Graham said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on November 18. “The big problem I have is that you’re criminalizing the war…. I think you’ve made a fundamental mistake here.”
Holder’s “bad history” fits in the larger context of an invented history. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his cohorts are prized patsies for the official 9/11 fairy tale used to launch the global war on terror and turn the United States into a surveillance and police state.
Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset who died in December, 2001. “Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader,” Fox News reported on December 26, 2001. “Bin Laden, according to the source, was suffering from a serious lung complication and succumbed to the disease in mid-December, in the vicinity of the Tora Bora mountains. The source claimed that bin Laden was laid to rest honorably in his last abode and his grave was made as per his Wahabi belief.”
On October 26, 2002, CNN reported on a London-based Arab news magazine publishing Osama’s will. “He did write the will as someone saying good-bye,” Hani Nakshabandi of the Arab news magazine Al Majalla told CNN.
According to the former dictator of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, Osama died because he was unable to get treatment for a kidney disease. “I think now, frankly, he is dead for the reason he is a … kidney patient,” Musharraf told CNN on January 18, 2002. “I don’t know if he has been getting all that treatment in Afghanistan now. And the photographs that have been shown of him on television show him extremely weak.”

In February of 2002, CNN terrorism analyst Peter Bergen said Osama bin Laden had “aged enormously between ‘97 and October” of 2001. “This is a man who was clearly not well. I mean, as you see from these pictures here, he’s really, by December he’s looking pretty terrible.”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN medical correspondent, concurred. “You can look [at pictures from a December 2001 video] and notice that he has what some doctors refer to as sort of a frosting over of his features—his sort of grayness of beard, his paleness of skin, very gaunt sort of features. A lot of times people associate this with chronic illness. Doctors can certainly look at that and determine some clinical features…. The sort of frosting of the appearance is something that people a lot of times associate with chronic kidney failure, renal failure, certainly someone who is requiring dialysis would have that,” said Gupta on January 21, 2002.
“Of course, by the time Gupta had made his prognosis, the CIA asset bin Laden was dead and buried, as patients with chronic kidney failure do not fare well in the Afghan outback without a kidney dialysis machine, unless we are to believe Osama’s helpers ferried one in, or maybe the ISI did by way of the CIA’s Air America transport,” this correspondent wrote with a measured degree of sarcasm on September 9, 2007, after a spate of supposed Osama videos appeared, more than a few with the assistance of the SITE Institute, a documented Mossad propaganda front (SITE shares an IP address with another Israeli intelligence front, MEMRI).
In September of 2007, a revitalized Osama appeared in a video complete with a Grecian Formula makeover. The new Osama was a stark contrast to the sickly Osama and the fat Osama supposedly confessing to the 9/11 attacks in a video made public on December 13, 2001.
Hamid Karzai, the former employee of the oil company Unocal and current handpicked president of U.S. occupied Afghanistan, told CNN in October of 2002 that Osama bin Laden was “probably dead.”

“The more we don’t hear of him, and the more time passes, there is the likelihood that he probably is either dead or seriously wounded somewhere,” said Karzai seven years ago.
Dale Watson, the head of the FBI’s counter-terrorism unit, said in July of 2002 that Osama was “probably” dead. “It is thought to be the first time a senior US law-enforcement official has publicly offered an opinion on whether Bin Laden, the prime suspect believed to be behind the 11 September attacks, is dead or alive,” the BBC reported.

Israeli intelligence said Bin Laden died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December. The Israelis went so far as to declare the purported Osama videos that have appeared since December, 2001, are fabrications.
Sen. Robert Menendez and the neocon Sen. Lindsey Graham have a vested interest in keeping the dead nemesis Osama bin Laden alive. The trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will be an orchestrated and highly controlled farce that will perpetuate the contrived war on terror.
It remains to be seen if the notorious KSM will be asked about his dubious confession via waterboard, in particular his assertion that he planned the bombing of the Plaza Bank.
“Khalid Shaikh Mohammed’s alleged confession testimony has been thoroughly discredited after it emerged that one of the targets he identified, the Plaza Bank, was not founded until 2006, four years after the alleged Al-Qaeda mastermind’s arrest,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote on March 16, 2007.

Friday Church News Notes

Spiritual Matters

A Day after Thanksgiving

Tony Blair agreed to have a regime change in Iraq with George Bush when they discussed it in Bush's ranch. Sir Christopher was the British ambassador to America between 1997 and 2003. He said that the April 2002 meeting in Crawford, TX appeared to be a major turning point. He said that in evidence: ”I took no part in any of the discussions and there was a large chunk of that time when no adviser was there. ”I know what the Cabinet Office says were the results of the meeting but to this day I am not entirely clear what degree of convergence was, if you like, signed in blood at the Crawford ranch.” Sir Chistopher said that the change in stance was evidence in a speech where Blair have said. Tony Blair tried to conflate the threat of Osama in Laden and Saddam Hussein into one. The US/UK united in an alliance to fight Iran. Also, Laden and Hussein were people manipulated by Western intelligence agencies for decaes. Now, Bush and Blair talked about using a fake plane (dressed in U.N. colors) to go into Iraqi airspace to provoke Iraq to attack it so war can commence. So, the Iraq war wasn't about helping the Iraqi people to be freed from a dictator. It was about trying to control Iraq's oil, prevent Iraq from using euros outside of dollars, and to make Iraq a buffer in the Middle East (or make that region to embrace the new world order system under the guise of a "democracy").

A female victim of a forced abortion say that the murderer or pratitioner Hodari was cruel to her. Caitlin Bruce is the victim of the forced abortion by Alberto Hodari. A staffer by force restrained Bruce as she screamed no. Now, Bruce have given an interview to a local television station where she describes how Hodair and his associate ripper the life out of her. Caitlin Bruce told WJRT-TV about her lawsuit she has filed against Hodari and said that she changed her mind (and withdrew her consent for the abortion after seeing an ultrasound of the unborn baby). Hodari still wanted to kill her baby when she said no. She was screaming and crying as Hodari put his weight against her chest. Bruce was just 18 years old at the time. She was 6 months pregnant. This occured in the Hodari's Femine Health Care clinic abortion center in Flint on last year. "I was nervous and I really didn't have the moral support I needed. And I just didn't know what to do," Bruce told the ABC television station. She questioned herself in the waiting room about whether having an abortion was the right decision. "They started the ultrasound. The lady turned the ultrasound toward me and said, 'This is your baby. This is the heart flicker,'" Bruce said. When she changed her mind, Hodari gave her an abortion anyway. He gave her a smirk and walked away when Caitlin was victimized. Hodari's attorney is Steve Weiss. Weiss said that Bruce was already bledding when she verbalized any misgivings (while the surgical instrument was inside of her uterus). Of couse, Weiss is going to say that Dr. Hodari did everything correct and that it was too late for the doctor to stop the abortion.
Tom Pabst, the attorney for Bruce, who allowed her to give the interview, says a forced abortion is always wrong no matter which side of the abortion debate one supports.
"This is shockingly wrong no matter what camp you're in," he told the station. "This shouldn't have happened. If a woman says stop, it should've stopped." The lawsuit was filed because county prosecutors are not looking into the incident for possible criminal charges. Troy Newsman, who is the Operation Rescue President, followed Bruce's case and exposed Hodari's shoddy practices for years. "Hodari is a menace to the public and the sooner he is held accountable for his atrocities in a court of law, the better," he told today. "It is shocking and wrong that this quack is still in business. We ask that the Michigan Attorney General's office launch a criminal investigation into Hodari's shop of horrors, and will be filing a formal request to that effect this week,"he added.

Global Warming that's man-made is being exposed all of the time. It's been discovered that Obama's science czar John Holdren was involved in unwinding "Climategate" scandal. There is still the battle goign about with the emails from the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit or CRU. Tim Ball and Judi McLeod believe that John Holdren is directly invovled in the scandal. Now, files released by a CEU hacker or a whistlelower show that the pro-global warming extremists wanted to ridicule people, and bully people with a different view than their own (according to Canada Free Press columnist and Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball). “The files contain so much material that it is going to take some time t o put it all in context,” says Ball. The emails that are released now already prove that the entire claims and positions fo the IPCC or the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are based on manipulated, false data. So, the information is compromised completely. Reputations of the scientists can be already destroyed and fringe players are bein identified. Most of the mainstream media aren't report on this Climategate scandal. This is the biggest sicentific scandal in history of course with global policy implications. There is a multitude of small but frightening stories in the massive files,” Ball writes. Physicists Sallie Balinunas and Willie Soon proved the existence of the Medieval Warm Period from numerous sources. So, warmer periods in Earth's history have occured before the late 20th century. John Holdren in an email supported the debunked hockey stick graph that dominated the 2001 IPCC Report. Holdren's email to Michael Mann and Tom Wigley disagree with Soon (plus Baliunas)'s view on surface temperatures spanning over the past millennium. “Holdren has a long history of seeking total government control. He was involved in the Club of Rome providing Paul Ehrlich with the scientific data in his bet with Julian Simon. Ehrlich lost the bet. Holdren’s behavior in this sorry episode with Soon and Baliunas is too true to form and shows the leopard never changes his spots,” Ball concludes. Holdren supported a planetary regime, forced abortion, mass sterilizations, etc. in his Ecoscience book from the 1970's. So, the climategate scandal isn't going away. This should be inspiration to solve real environmental problems without the global warming hysteria.

The European Union is exposed once again. The European Union Parliament reprimanded MEP Nigel Farage for legitimately criticizing the EU. Nigel has an exchange with EU leaders. Farage called out the EU for acting as an authoritarian dictatorship and it's controlled by unelected bureaucrats to the deteriment of national sovereignity. A tyrannical 1999 law makes it illegal to criticize the EU if you're a member of it. European Commission President Manuel Barroso couldn't refute Farage's words, but he scowled. The EU has lies and cronyism. Farage criticized the EU for its bad policy of ignoring Ireland's initial rejections of the Lisbon Treaty. He said that: "...It’s taken you eight and a half years of bullying, of lying, of ignoring democratic referendums to get this treaty through (referring to the Lisbon Treaty)”. He believed that the appointment of Van Rompuy as the first EU President is like electing a front man for Barroso. Farage said that van Rompuy is an elected politican unless Baroness Ashton. Ashton landed the job of high Represenative for Foreign Affairs. “In some ways she’s ideal isn’t she ,” said Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party. “She has never had a proper job, and has never been elected to anything in her life, so I guess she’s perfect for this European Union.” Jerzy Buzek of the President of the European Parliament said that Farage is wrong and he reprimanded him. The truth is that the EU is trying to stamp free speech. A Dutch MP wasn't allowed to go into Britain since his political views were seen as offensive under EU laws. Euro MP’s have consistently attempted to ban the “dangerous and unregulated blogosphere” in an attempt to shut down free speech on the Internet. Under the 1999 ruling of the European Court Of Justice (case 274/99), it is illegal to criticize the EU and the EU is on a mission to outlaw any national political parties that do not pander to the European federal superstate agenda. Many EU people like Ashton (who married an advisor and friend of Tony Blair. She helped to get the Lisbon Treaty passed in England. Ashton took money from a member of the Communist Party in Great Britain in her role as Treasury for the CND. Communism is opposed diametrically to Western democracy or freedom) aren't elected by the people, but chosen by the elite. Farage wanted people to have accountablility. The EU and the euro was discussed by the Bilderberg Group as early as the mid 1950's according to the Bilderberg's leaked documents. The Bilderbergers wanted an European common market and a single currency in 1955 according to documents as well. Prince Bernhard of the Netherland has been said to have been a former Nazi SS officer and pro-Jesuit Rettinger is a key founder of the Bilderbergers themselves. Even high level Nazis in the 1940's wanted a single European economic community, whose agenda existed after WWII. The Nazis and the EU have an intertwined past indeed. The fact that the EU was a brainchild of top Nazi economists and industrialists, formulated as a means of preserving dictatorial power and then implemented by a former Nazi working under the auspices of the Bilderberg Group in 1955, proves that the entire European Union system is poisoned with a legacy and a raison d’être of totalitarianism. That is why the EU forced Ireland to accept the Lisbon when Ireland rejected it in early 2009 via a national referndum. The European Union want authoritarian control of as many European nations as possible. Van Rompuy and Ashton will fullfill the goals of the Bilderbergers and the EU, which one of them is to create an unified European superstate. This planned superstate is against national sovereignity indeed.

Secret Societies still have influence in world hsitory. The Rothschild's coat of arms is very similar to the Coat of Arms of the British SIS or the Secret Intelligence Service. The Rothschilds are a very powerful bloodline, but they aren't more powerful than the Pilgrims and the Vatican/Jesuit network though. The Rothschilds didn't want the Aliyahs in Israel and changed their minds becuase of financial/political reasons. The 2nd Baron Rothschild or Walter Rothschilds funded much of the Zionist movement. The Rothschild family fund the construction of the Masonic/Illuminist symbol filled Israeli Supreme Court. Now, the MI5's logo has the All Seeing Eye (in a Capstone) with the crown as logos. Natalite Portman's great grandmother was a spy for MI5. Another logo of MI5 has a brain under a crown with the Latin phrase of "Semper Occultus" or Always Secret outling that intelligence agencies keep creates like Secret socieites. The MI6/SIS building has symbolism like it looks similar to the Tower of Babel (it has a structure looking like a ziggurat as well). It has a mirror pattern with a symmetrical design as well. Sir Terry Farrell is the designer of the MI6's ziggurat design. There is a 8 stone pillars in a circle as well. The Thames House where the MI5 base is located has the archway design looking similar to the arch pattern in Masonry. It has a keystone too with a caduceus on the left. There are crests with the figures of Britannia and St. George (its cross and England's flag looks similar to the Templars). There are twin pillars and other symbols. In the arch, there is a grid pattern with sun images on squares. These sun images can represent flowers like roses. The keystone is famous in Masonic images spanning centuries.

By Timothy