The Supreme Court made their ruling on the Second Amendment. It was a 5 to 4 decision. In the nutshell, some of the court decision was good and the rest of it was bad. It was accurate to say that the Second Amedment is an individual right. Far too often, anti-gun forces use deception to only assume that the militia has the right to own weapons. Well, militia was defined by the Founding Fathers as citizens via their own writings. Also, the Founders made this interpretation long before the invention of the National Guard during the early 1900's. The District of Colombia v. Heller was the case. The DC gun ban restricting all citizens from owning a handgun even in the privacy of their own home has been banned. The bad news is that the Supreme Court never questioned the hundreds of anti-gun laws that exist now. These anti-gun laws include like registering to have a gun, manufacturing controls, banning guns from those with even simple depression, requiring licences to just have a gun for innocent citizens, etc. In other words, in some places if you don't have a license renewed for a weapon, you could be met with a SWAT Team trying to arrest you. So, the Supreme Court did a half-hearted decision. One of the only good news is that no level of government can overtly ban all citizens from having a gun, but tons of restrictions still exist. Even Nancy Pelosi (she adheres to the Fairness Doctrine, which strifes free speech) sid that the ruling still allows D.C. to regulate the gun rights of America. Many Americans from a wide variety of political orientations accept the Second Amendment, so this isn't an one party deal. The FISA bill's composition definitely has components in it which goes contrary to the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment dispulates that people have a right to be secure in their persons, houses, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. This can't be violated and warrants can only come unless there is probable cause which is supported by oath and affirmation. In other words, the Fourth Amendment represent citizens having the right to secure their own property and it bans warrantless searches. Senator Orrin Hatch is a Mormon and he decided to mock critics of the FISA Bill. He said that those who disagree with the bill are akin to 9/11 Truth people calling 9/11 an inside job. He is wrong to mock 9/11 Truthers in that fashion along with those who disagree with the FISA bill. The reason is that most people who sincerely believe that 9/11 was an inside aren't nuts or extremists. Doctors or Phds (like Dr. Steven Jones), engineers, researchers, authors, witnesses, and other credible people of many backgrounds have outline clear dissent over the official story of 9/11. Also, 9/11 was an inside job, because an inside job is an act done by a select group of peope for an evil, nefarious purpose. That's one clear definition describing what 9/11 is all about. Therefore, I oppose the FISA bill. I don't want the government on any level snooping our phone calls, medical records, our credit, and other forms of personal information without a warrant including them telling me about it. Ironically Barack Obama supports the FISA bill under the guise of being tolerant or more "centrist." That's why I don't support Obama or McCain. Both of them are related to Merovingian bloodlines or European families. Some "progressives" like Senator Feingold are legitimately criticizing him over this, but many liberals fail to see that Obama is just as much corporate sponsored as McCain is. For example, Goldman Sachs, UBS AG, Lehman Brothers, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse fund the Obama campaign. Barack Obama's top foreign policy advisor is none other than Zbigniew Brzezinski (the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission and the funder of the Muslim Muhajadeen terrorists in the late 1970's). One of Obama's economic advisers is a Bonesman. I oppose neo liberals and neo conservative since they're nearly identical in their political outlook for the general population in America plus the world.
Glen Beck is a famous neo conservative on CNN. CNN has mostly liberal hosts just like FOX has mostly neo-conservatives hosts. Beck have hosted many famous political figures. He's popular and recieves either hatred or praise for his commentaries. On his radio show, the CNN host Glen Beck made controversial statements about the Supreme Court decision. That decision allowed terror suspects the right to challege their detention in civilian courts. Now Glen Beck said that if he were President, he would eliminate detaining and prosecuting terrorism suspects altogether. Beck said that he would shoot them all in the head if we think they are against us. That of course is wrong and despicable for many reasons. One is that murdering innocent people, especially if they don't witness due process is wrong. Arbitratily killing people who are just suspected of being terrorists is the essence of terrorism itself. The neo cons are hypocrites for abhoring terrorism, but adhering to torture, killing people who are innocent, etc. which represent acts of terrorism. Many held in Guantanamo Bay's were innocent. The "Tipton Three" were force into false confessions and they wer later released from that location. Huzaifa Parhat was an ethnic Uighur Chinese national. He was swept up by U.S. forces in Afghanistan who was falsely improperly classified as an "enemy combatant." Parhat has been recommended for release by U.S. officials, while no evidence was discovered by a member of any radical group. Over 30 former Guantanamo detainees have already been released. This isn't new of Beck since he disrepected Katrina victims and even neo conservative Michael Reagan called for the murder of Mark Dice. One EU kingpin was very arrogant. His name is Valéry Giscard d'Estaing and he is a member of the powerful Knights of Malta. He scoffed at the Irish rejection of the Lisbon Treaty, which would of codified the European Constitution throughout the EU. d'Estaing said that the majority of EU nations can overrule the votes of the Irish people. Yet, Ireland follow their rules and even EU laws (i.e. if an EU nation member rejects a bill, then all EU nations must scrap it) in rejecting the Lisbon Treaty. The European Union used the tactic of simply to keep repeating a referendum until they achieve the result they desire. In 2001 the Irish voted No to the Nice Treaty and were simply asked to vote again a year later. That time they said Yes. In 1992 Denmark voted No to the Maastricht Treaty - and voted Yes a year later. For the EU is to disregard the voice of the Irish people and even their own rules to get nefarious goals accomphlish means some in the EU have a dictatorship-like mindset. Immigration and the border are important issues to make manifest. Newstalk 550 KFYI from June 26, 2008 reported on cartels. It says that suspects may have been hired by drug cartels to do home invasions and assassinations in the United States. Police reports outline that 3 men were arrested in Phoenix. These 3 were caught in a home invasion in Phoenix and homicide. They may have been apart of the Mexican army. While on the J.D. Hayworth show, Phoenix Law Enforcement Association President Mark Spencer said that the men involved were hired by drug cartels to enact home invasions and assassinations. The incident resulted in the death of the homeowner. It occured in Monday at 8329 W. Cypress St. From 50 to 100 rounds were fired at the house. Spencer said that a police officer told him that one of men captured told the police something. He told the police that he was prepared to ambush the Phoenix police, but they ran out of ammunition. Three other men involved escaped. The intruders were all dressed in military tactical gear and were armed with AR-15 assault rifles. This revolves around not only our borders being inadequately protect but sources like Cele Castillo saying that the U.S. government is training some of these paramilitary groups.
Roland Martin once again strereotyped Pro lifers and conservative Christians. He did this days ago on the CNN show named Anderson 360. I remember Anderson Cooper from Channel One and Cooper is of the Vanderbilt family tree. Martin was obviously angry at the Dobson/Obama controversy. Roland S. Martin, Freemason Al Sharpton, and Tony Perkins had a discussion about religion and politics. Martin was angry over Dobson's criticism of Obama as ignorant of the Bible including having a fruitcake interpretation of the Constitution. Sharpton was calm. Perkins and Martin got into a small argument. Perkins said that Dobson doesn't refer himself as a minister. Martin said the conservative Christians and pro-life don't usually expand their reach from just 2 issues. Also, Roland Martin said that pro-lifers don't care about taking care children after they're born. That's false on both accounts. First off, real conservative Christians don't just talk about 2 issues. For centuries, conservative Christians have talked about literary issues, trafficking, the evils of the slave trade, religious liberty rights, prostitution, poverty, the building of communities, the spreading of the gospel, etc. Many early Universities in America were founded by many Bible-believing Christians. Also, most Christians (irrespective of their political leanings) have talked about improving child care, helping children outside of the womb, and educational issues. Pro-life people have always cared about helping children after their concieved in promotion adoption, education, health care, non-profits helping children, etc. Some of us just don't want socialism or the government handling our every lives 24/7. To Martin's credit, he is right to call all citizens to expand their minds in explaining as many issues a possible. It's obvious that Martin is an Obama supporter. This doesn't mean that Dobson is innocent in this affair. Dobson is an Ecumencial (i.e. the suppot of the false doctrine filled Roman Catholic Religion. The Pope calls himself Holy Father, which is blasphemy and God's representative on Earth. Ecumencialism interrelates sometimes to Dominionism or a false gospel trying to force society into a religious theocracy. That runs contrary to instead of allowing people voluntarily to live holy lives. Dobson wrote that self esteem is more than academic excellence and promotes a self esteem/psychological gospel). Dr. Cathy Burns have written interesting information about James Dobson. CCTV and civil libertes don't mix. Bruce Schneier from the Guardian on June 26, 2008 wrote about these issues. Bruce wrote that pervasive security cameras like the CCTV don't reduce crime substantially. The only exceptions recieve the press coverage. CCTV cameras were utilized in catching the James Bulger murderers in 1993. Studies outline the ineffectiveness of CCTV cameras for the most part. One example of this is how there was a comprehensie study made by the Home Office in 2005. The study found that CCTV cameras solve very few crimes and their deterrent effect is minimal. Despite about 500,000 cameras in London, it isn't the safest city on the planet. There are technological limitations of the CCTV cameras, limitations of the police, and adaptive ability of criminals. Most CCTV footage is never looked at until well after a crime is committed. Sometimes it's difficult to decipher the identity of the suspects because of the lighting being bad, the image is grainly, etc. In Britian, the CCTV cameras cost a lot of money. They cost about £500 m in the past 10 years. Surveillance technologies have advanced to the point of X-Rays in US airports seeing people's whole bodies and nanotechnology. It's indeed a Brave New World there.
Foreign Policy issues from North Korea to Zimbabwe are coming in the news. President George W. Bush announced that he is placing North Korea off the axis of evil list. The reason is that North Korea wants to be more forthcoming in their investigation of their nuclear supplies. North Korea has a long history with America. Back in the 1950's, America had a war with North Korea and it was a tie. General Douglas MacArthur wanted to go into China with U.S. forces. Subsequently, Truman fired him for it. Actually, the Korean war was the first time American troops were bounded under United Nations' order to solve the border crisis in the Korean region. The U.N. was a globalist organization whose headquarters were placed in Rockefeller land. Even Cardinal Spellman was a big proponent of the United Nations. As a result of that war, Korea was divided into North and South. North Korea is a Communist nation and South Korean is more republic plus pro-America. North Korea destroyed its cooling tower. Bush wants North Korea to possess or create no nuclear weapons. Bush is starting to eliminate sanctions on North Korea. In Zimbabwe, violence is going in because of the election dispute. One candidate has fled the nation. The Jesuit trained Robert Mugabe still wants to be the sole President of Zimbabwe. The opposition candidate for President left Zimbabwe, so Mugabe is left unopposed. Robert is a pure criminal dictator. This doesn't mean imperalism is the answer. The answer is to inspire the people of Zimbabwe to get rid of Robert Mugabe. Times Herald-Record from June 26, 2008 reported on New York going into a certain direction. New York officals want every adult in the Bronx to voluntarily take a HIV test within 3 years. Health officials say while Manhattan has the highest incidence of HIV and AIDS, the Bronx has the highest AIDS-related death rate. Medical care give in emergency rooms will start voluntary testing routine. Some experts attribute late action to the high date rate of AIDS in the Bronx. Even Manhattan has the highest incidence of HIV plus AIDS in New York City. The truth is that care should be given unto victims of HIV and AIDS, but serious questions from scientists question the causal link of HIV toward AIDS. Some critics of this plan beleve that the government are mining for medical data among a lot of the poor human beings residing in the Bronx. Also, why would the government promote all Bronx residents to have HIV testing when some residents there are virgins, never taken drugs, or haven't exchanged blood (or fluids) before. The governments acts like they love us?? Well, many transnational corporations and certain members of the government were at the forefront of testing poisons and dangerous chemicals on the populations of America. Global warming paranoia and globalism is being promoted in the 21st century. A college is having a mandatory course on global citizenship. Centennial College is the name ofthe college doing this. They want kids to be educated about current issues. It's being held in Ontario, Canada. There is nothing wrong with discussion and learning about international issues. The problem is that they call children global citizens and they embrace a form of globalism. The truth is that we are not global citizens. We are citizens of our respective countries. Nationalism and national sovereignity are important to embrace because they promote the value of true independence while not negating the need to help those from around the world. The elite and sexual abuse is a common occurence for thousands of years of recorded human history. Ancient Greece and ancient Rome (the Piso family was above and beyond the Caesar's powers for a time) had this history. Now, in the UK, some want to ask the government permission for parents to just kiss their children. This proposal also requires the parents to have government permission to take their children to the swimming pool in public. Sociologist Professor Fran Furedi said that these action will poison relationships between the generations. He's right, because it is vital for affection among families to increase their connections of emotion, thinking, and love. In a think tank report, Professor Furedi highlighted cases where government checks were already being required by schools and other organizations for parents to merely interact with their own children in public. Furedi wrote that a woman couldn't kiss her daughter goodbye beause she wasn't vetted. Another mother was told by another parent that she and her husband were CRB checked when their daughter played together. Government fear mongering says that pedophia is an epidemic, but child abduction rates have steadily dropped since the 1970's in the United Kingdom. Child abuse numbers are also being artificially inflated by charities like the NSPCC who were caught faking abuse cases to generate cash donations. State run programs have been caught in child abuse under the guise of protecting children. CPS or Child Protective Services have been involved in scandals. The CIA and certain members of the U.S. government were caught in child sex trafficking rings in the U.S. These evil acts include the kidnapping of Johnny Gosch, who vanished without a trace in 1982. There is one connection to abuse scandals in the 1980's that doesn't recieve much attention. That link is that Vatican role in such scandals. For example, Boystown in the 1980's was caught in child abuse. John DeCamp (he was an ex-aide of the Knight of Malta CIA boss William Colby) wrote about this scandal and tthe Franklin child sex abuse case. The overseer of Boystown was the Roman Catholic Monsignor's Robert Hupp. A judge forced DeCamp to take the Arch Diocese off the lawsuit. It's easy to decipher that the Roman Catholic Church was involved in child abuse for a long time. Ted Gunderson writes about similar subject matter, but unfortunately doesn't outline the Vatican's role in the sexual abuse of young children. Human trafficking is a global occurence that has been exposed by conservatives, liberals, and independents. Stealing children and banning innocent behavior among parents and children were key duties of sick dictatorships like in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.
Secret Societies are a critical part of human history. Many of them have done disgusting evil in world history. One example is the Black Hand Secret Society. The Black Hand had one of its members named Princep murdered a monarch from the Austria-Hungary Empire. June 28, 1914 was the date of the murder. Franz Ferdinand died. It's interesting to note that trial commenced and Cabrinovic admitted that some Freemasons were involved in the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. Cabrinovic claimed that some Freemasons condemned Ferdinand to death from a Masonic Lodge many years before 1914. Of course, we realize that Ferdinand's death was one out of a list of factors (i.e. competition among European nations, the growth of the German military, the call for Slavic nationalism, etc.) which contributed to the advent of World War One. Princep wasn't a Mason, but he was apart of the Black Hand Secret Society. Lately, elite groups and Secret Societies use even more deception and obfusction to get their agenda across. Now, a common thread among the multiple among of secret societies is that some embrace occultism (this goes back to the Mystery Schools. The kings didn't rule these schools but the priesthood ruled these Mystery Schools), they want power to stir societies, and they desire to create a Utopia. Famous leaders are members of secret orders or have connections to them. Even Gandhi had links with Freemasonry and the Theosophical Society. The Bush family have links of course to the Skulls and Bones and the Vatican (For example, Jeb Bush is a high level at least 3rd Degree Knight of Columbus. Prescott Bush, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush are members of the Skulls and Bones. The leadership of the Vatican, not all Catholics, have called for the establishment of a new world order like Pope Benedict XVI. Te Vatican has over 1 billion members worldwide). The new order of the ages in an utopia have been the dream of many secret orders for thousands of years. The concept of a man-made Utopians comes from Plato, the Gnostics, Sir Francis Bacon, the Enlightenment (which influenced the Bavarian Illuminati headed by Jesuit trained professor Adam Weishaupt), many Freemasons, the neo-conservatives, and other factions. The truth always begins with God.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment