A Cashless Society is being promoting all of the time. There are central bankers in Japan that are discussing about the abolition of cash. Richard Jerram is a senior economist with Macquarie bank. He told investors that this proposal is more practical with the broad penetration of electronic money and credit cards in Japan according to the Times Online. Bankers say that the scheme will rescue the economy from a deflationary spiral. Japan has printed money out of thin air for more than a decade to fight against deflation. Deflation relates to the economy, because consumers are holding back from paying objects and they wait for cheaper prices. Economists believe that in Japan’s case nominal interest rates of -4 per cent might be required to “rescue” the economy from deflation. In actuality, the bankers love inflation, so they invent schemes to fight against deflation. The pro-isolationist and Freemason Charles Lindbergh said in 1913 (upon the eve of the passage of the Federal Reserve Act) that the new Act will create inflation whenever trusts want inflation. He is right. The trusts (or the criminal association of bankers) have consistently imposed inflation since the Federal Reserve Act was passed by Congress during the night of Christmas recess in 1913. The government loves inflation, because it depends on it to finance its operations. The government needs a huge amount of money to pay back their debt owed to the banks. The FED leaders promised to keep the system going in 2002. He gave a speech about combating deflation even talking about using a helicopter metaphorically to stop it in another speech (He was nicknamed "Helicopter Ben" for it). Japan might become a testing ground to see what would happen in a nation that's totally without paper currency, but have cashless digits (according to according to one Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi strategist. The plan is “in the realms of economic science fiction,” he said). This agenda is about the bankers controlling our economy. A cashless society can allow the elite to control the masses in a bigger way. This cashless system can work in conjunction with satellite and cellphone tracking, ubiquitous RFID chips, DARPA and NSA surveillance, the orchestrated end of Posse Comitatus and the federalization of local police and governments now well underway. This is Big Brother at its finest. Proposals of a cashless society, global currency, and the like is enough proof to see that we are living in the latter days.
NAZILA FATHI and ALAN COWELL from The New York Times on June 19, 2009 reported that Iran's ruling cleric, whose name is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned that opposition supporters could see bloodshed if protests persist. Despite of this warning from this tyrannical theocrat, people are legitimately in the streets protesting the dictatorical policies of Iran. I don't agree with rioting, the West manipulating Iran, or an invasion of Iran. Yet, I do believe that the Iranian people have every right to go out in the streets and protest for their individual liberty. Some people have said that as high as 150 demonstrators have died. People are being dragged out of their homes. Tons of crowds oppose the present Iranian regime. The dictators in Iran can murder innocent people, but they can never ever stop the idea of religious and political freedom in the world. The police have assaulted the protesters, beaten people, and some have been murdered by Iranian authorities. All sides should stop violence of course, but not peaceful protests though. There is dispute whether the election was rigged. The Ayattollah denied the opposition’s accusations that the vote was rigged, praising the officially declared landslide for the incumbent, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as an “epic moment that became a historic moment.” Mr. Ahmadinejad was shown in photographs listening quietly in the audience. The election have Ahmadinejad having 63 percent of the vote, while Moussavi (who wants to be a marytr if necessary) had 34 percent of vote. Mr. Moussavi refused to met with the other 2 Presidential candidates in the Guardian Council, which is the powerful body that oversees the elections. Regardless of whether the election was rigged or not, Iran should make real reforms in their country. Barack Obama is taking the right approach by expressing restraint over in Iran, but not supporting the liberty violations in that country as well. “What happened is beyond cheating,” the friend, Mohsen Makhmalbaf, a film director, said in a hastily organized news conference in Paris. “Since Friday, a 30-year-old page was turned. We’ve fallen into dictatorship. For the first time in 30 years there have been grass-roots demonstrations with millions of people, and these demonstrations stand as a proof that people want democracy.” His daughter Samira, also a filmmaker, said, “Until Friday we had 80 percent dictatorship and 20 percent democracy, and since Friday we have 100 percent dictatorship.” There have been many rallies going on all over the nation of Iran now. Many protesters are sincere and are trying their best to eliminate the perception that they are tools of Western influence. There is no doubt that the CIA and the West have funded destabilization efforts in Iran then and now (along with funding black operations). Yet, not every protester in Iran are agents of the U.S. trying to develop a coup in Iran. One example is how Neda Soltani, who is a female protester was murdered just because she was protesting. Neda was shot in her chest and it was wrong. She is certainly a representation of the protesters in Iran. Time will tell what the future will hold for Iran. There are home invasions in Iran like in Tehran as well. Yet, hopefully, the future of Iran will be better than it is now.
North Korea is accused of trying to launch a long range ballistic missile test that could travel over Hawaii. The North Korean military have never enacted this military capability before. Some are concerned about this possible act. North Korea may do this test on American Independence Day according to Japanese intelligence officials. This missile is believed to be a Taepodong-2 with a range of 4,000 miles. It would be launched in early July from a Dongchang-ni site on the north western coast of that secretive country. The intelligence analysts don't believe that the device is capable of hitting Hawaii's main islands. These islands are 4,500 miles from North Korea. North Korea once launched shorter range missile who trajectory carried it over Japan. Suddenly, the average Japanese citizen understood that North Korean missiles could rain down upon their heads. This realization was compounded by the fact that Japanese Intelligence had assured its citizens that North Korea did not possess a missile which could reach Japan. Japan's best selling newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun reported on the missile stroy. The international community via the United Nations punished North Korea in defiance of a U.N. ban (by conducting a second nuclear test on May 25). Japanese Intelligence said that the communist state is likely to fire the missile between July 4 and 8. That time would be the 15th anniversary of Norht Korean President Kim Il-Sung's death. If this test can reach near Hawaii, then it will be a new era in the North Korean history. Robert Gates have already sent anti missile technology in the Pacific recently. North Korea certainly has a right to its freedom without leaders like Kim Jong Il. Some believe that the crisis involving America and North Korea was the one crisis talked about by Vice President Joseph Biden (relating to the serious, critical crisis that President Barack Obama will have to deal with) Time will tell what the future will have for the nation of North Korea.
Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on June 12, 2009 wrote about how a group that wants the medical board to revoke licenses of Tiller Abortion Associates. This group is a Kansas pro-life group. These abortion practitioners were colleagues of the slain late-term abortion pracitioner George Tiller. This group is called Kansans for Life and they believe that 3 Tiller colleagues may have violations that the board should examine. During the time of Tiller's death, the Kansas Board of Healing Arts (that regulates physicians in the state) had taken 2 of the 3 steps needs to revoke his medical license. The board had declared as a finding of fact that illegal post-viability abortions had been performed at Tiller's abortion business over the last six years because they were done without the legally required referrals of a doctor not financially or legally affiliated with the abortion practitioner. State law required a second doctor to sign off on the supposed validity of the late-term abortion and that the physician have no relationship with the one doing the abortions. Tiller and his colleagues relied on Kristin Neuhaus to sign off on the abortions. The medical board said that Neuhaus derived her entire income form okaying abortions at Tiller's business. "The Board's assertion of criminal activity deserves continued aggressive action to prevent any and all Kansas abortion clinics from undermining the independent second physician requirement, or any other part of the 1998 post-viable ban in Kansas," KFL director Mary Kay Culp told LifeNews.com. "Therefore, we continue to call for regulatory actions and revocation of the medical licenses of not only Kristin Neuhaus, but Tiller’s former associates LeRoy Carhart, Shelly Sella and Susan Robinson," Culp continued. "In March, Tiller testified in court that these doctors also used Neuhaus for their referrals at his clinic." The state board dropped its complaint against Tiller's license after his death. Yet, Culps wants her group to move the board with other complaints. They want to do this especially Lerory Carhart intends to open up a late-term abortion clinic in Kansas. The Kansans for Life has a still active complaint that wants the Board to take action agaisnt all Kansas-licensed doctors involved in illegal late-term abortions. The 1998 Kansas ban on the abortion of viable babies have narrow exceptions and slickly crafted requirements. The law says that abortions can exist among post-viable babies if a 2nd unaffiliated Kansas licensed physician verifies such an abortion is needed to prevent the death of the mother (or there is irreversible and substantial bodily damage to the mother). According to Kansans for Life, since 1998 abortion practitioners have been required to file state abortion reports, and none of the over 5,000 late-term abortions (nearly 3,000 of them on viable unborn babies) have been reported as done to prevent the mother’s death. So, illegal abortions should be punished and abortion is always murder.
Jeremy Scahill from RebelReports on June 18, 2009 proved that the government in the Barack Obama administration is using money to fund the expansion of wars. The White House and the Democratic Congressional Leadership are waging a campaign to scare up votes to support another $106 billion in funds for wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Paksitan. Many of these so-called anti-war Democrats left their own principls in the House to vote for the war funding. They are acting hypocritical. New York Democrat Anthony Weiner voted against war funding in May when it didn't matter, yet he voted with the pro-war Democrats. He said that since the wars are wrapping up, funding is necessary to achieve. The truth is that it seems that the government is only escalating not wrapping up the wars in Afghanistan and Paksitan especially. There are more than 21,000 U.S. troops going into Afghanistan. A 29% increase of armed contractors are coming about. The 106 billion dollar price tag in war funding isn't bringing our troops home at all. Jan Schakowsky voted for the war funding. Despite of her exposing Blackwater (and the privatized war machine), she did it. She called President Barack Obama a peacemaker when he is expanding wars. Giving the President whenever he wants only disrupts the legitimate concept of checks and balances, which can create more continuity in government. Real anti-war votes should exist in Congress. They shouldn't be a cultish mentality to unconditionally align with any party. Even Rep. Frank supports war funding and mocks anti-war people as having no sense of reality (even veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan lobbied against the war funding). That's a lie since many Iraqi and Afghanistan war veterans oppose funding for the war on terror. They aren't escaping reality. Some "anti-war" Democrats were needed to get the vote in favor of the war funding. While the White House reportedly told some Democrats who voted against the war, “you’ll never hear from us again,” Obama has made it a point this week to intervene to defend those hypocritical “anti-war” legislators who voted with him. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn was one of the 51 Democrats who voted against the funding in May and then consciously misplaced his principles Tuesday. Cohen was targeted for his hypocrispy (of voting for the war funding) and then the White House attempted to defend him. These votes are coming about, because of partisan reasons primarily. The White House is pressuring Democrats to supporting the illegal bloodshed going on in the war on terror. This isn't change at all. The spending bill could sail through the Senate without the anti-war crowd stopping it. The Democrats who turned their back on the pledges and voted for the war funding included: Yvette Clarke, Steve Cohen, Jim Cooper, Jerry Costello, Barney Frank, Luis Gutierrez, Jay Inslee, Steve Kagen, Edward Markey, Doris Matsui, Jim McDermott, George Miller, Grace Napolitano, Richard Neal (MA), James Oberstar, Jan Schakowsky, Mike Thompson, Edolphus Towns, Nydia Velázquez, and Anthony Weiner. So, this is the truth and the war on terror is murderous.
The Pentagon according to Bob Unruh (form WND.com) said that the Pentagon pulls the description of protesters as "terrorists." Yet, the catch is that the term is used by law enforcement regularly. The Department of Defense end a training manual question that linked protesters across America to terrorist. Some evidence is coming that describing Americans as terror suspects or low level terror suspects is routine. A letter from the Northern California ACLU (or the DoD's "Annual Level 1 Antiterrorism (AT) Awareness Training for 2009") tells department personnel these words: "that certain First Amendment-protected activity may amount to 'low-level terrorism.'" Specifically the training "Knowledge Check 1" asks, "Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism activity?" The multiple choices are: Attacking the Pentagon, IEDs, Hate crimes against racial groups and Protests. The correct answers in the training course is "Protests" (which have been withdrawn by the Pentagon). The reason is that the reason didn't make a distinction between legal protests which is protected by the U.S. Constitution and violence. This comes after the evil DHS report called people "right wing extremists" for just opposing abortion and wanting secure national borders. The Department of Defense situation was revealed by blogger Dennis Loo at Salon.com. He cited an ACLU complaint demanding that the DoD change its instructions and those who have been given the training be told of the modifications by "sending out corrective materials." The President of the Thomas More Law Center, who is Richard Thompson, said that they found more info on the DHS extremist report (plus they are researching things for its lawsuit over the report). The DHS report called us terrorists for us disagreeing with one world government, bad free trade agreements, etc. The head of the DHS issued no apologizes to this, except for the veterans. Thompson found that the far left SPLC (or the Southern Poverty Law Center which is right to oppose bigotry but wrong in stereotyping even peaceful conservatives as equivalent to neo-Nazis) is working with the DHS in all levels of government. The DHS, and the SPLC sent millions of dollars to create Fusion Centers (to spy on people. One Fusion center created the Missouri report that slander third party candidates as equated to pro-terrorist people). The SPLC also train people on hate crimes as well. The Thomas More Law Center filed its lawsuit against Napolitano and the DHS on behalf of nationally syndicated conservative radio talk show host Michael Savage, Gregg Cunningham of the pro-life organization Center for Bio-Ethical Reform Inc. and Iraqi War Marine veteran Kevin Murray. They believe that the Department of Homeland Security violated the First and Fifth Amendments of opposing the free speech rights of citizens. The lawsuit further claims that DHS encouraged law enforcement officers throughout the nation to target and report citizens to federal officials as suspicious rightwing extremists and potential terrorists because of their political beliefs. So, it's true that some in the federal government view us as not worthy of being accepted in society, because we just have differing points of ivew.
I've had many debates with skeptics of the 9/11 Truth movement. Regardless of these people, I will forever embrace 9/11 Truth. Now, a person named Colin criticized David Stewart since David believed that 9/11 was an inside job, which is. Colin said that I shown his article, which I did and I advocate his views on 9/11. I don't agree with David Stewart on every single issue though. Colin believes that information is manipulated by those in the truth movement to develop their conclusions. Of course I reject this premise, because many in the 911 Truth Movement are physicsts, doctors, teachers, PhDs, and other experts. They use logical arguments in their disagreements with the official story of 911. A group of sicentists found data from dusts and debris gathered in the days and weeks after the WTC collapsed on September 11, 2001. This study was published by the Open Chemical Physics Journal, which is a peer reviewed scientific population. Steven E. Jones and Niels Harrit believe that the dust and rubble of the World Trade Center towers lays evidence of "a highly engineered explosive," contrary to all federal studies of the collapses." The scientists claim that they found 'active thermitic material': a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in a form of thermite known as 'nanostructured super-thermite.' Thermite, (used in steel welding, fireworks shows, hand grenades and demolition), can produce a chemical reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time. Stephen Jones said that: "...'This finding really goes beyond anything that has previously been shown'...'We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the dust because this isn't just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or something -- this is a highly engineered material not readily available to just anyone..." In other words, the government can have access to the highly explosive thermite material. Also, Colin believes that since we discuss about 9/11 and Bush's strange behavior in a Florida, then we believe that ex-President George W. Bush is guilty of all of 9/11. The truth is that I don't believe that Bush is responsible for all of 9/11. Bush did have some foreknowledge of 9/11 by the repeated warnings of terrorist attacks sent his way (before 9/11 and him approving of a war plan to invade Afghanistan before 9/11). Colin says that he looked at many videos, websites, etc. about 9/11. Then, he said it's all biased, which is false since much of the evidence is real. See, Colin is biased against the information that he's seeing. The evidence of the Bush/Saudi Arabia economic link is real, the hijackers' link to FBI informat and military facilities is real, the government foreknowledge is real, and the NORAD Standdown is real. Then, he looked at "In Plane Sight" and talked about the Pentagon when many 9/11 Truth people reject the idea that a missile hit the Pentagon. WTC 7 does have tons of evidence of a controlled demolition and Colin denies it. WTC 7 wasn't unstable originally. It was built very strong. The firefighters were told that the building was going to collapse (even though the fires in the WTC 7 were very limited). The collapsed was less than 7 seconds and it fell in of itself, which is a sign of a demoliton. It feel late in the afternoon, becuase the building wasn't seriously damaged and then it strangely feel suddenly. Videos showed the collapsed that came from many independent people regardless of Colin mentioned. Colin conviently ignores how the government quickly shipped much of the debris into China, how NORAD violated standard operating procedures in protecting aircraft, how the governmented thwarted FBI flight school investigations before 9/11, the covert U.S./Saudi Arabian/Taliban/al-Qaeda connections spanning years, the record put options betting on American and United Airlines, etc. This evidence proved that some members of the U.S. federal government (especially its intelligence community) had foreknowledge and involvement in the 9/11 attacks via wargames (the monitoring of aircraft, standdown, and evidence of controlled demolition of the Twin Towers plus WTC 7. The key witness Barry Jennings said that he heard explosions in the Twin Towers). People like former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert Kevin McPadden are on record as having personally witnessed the countdown that preceded the collapse of Building 7 and others, like former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer, described hearing bombs tear down the building as he fled the collapse.Dick Cheney controlled the standdown orders in 9/11 according to Webster Tarpley. Folks who are victims of 9/11 are in the 9/11 Truth Movement, so these people aren't illogical. They are rational and the lies from the government will be exposed about 9/11. Nothing is going to change that at all. There are hundreds of smoking gun evidence that refutes the official story of 9/11. You can believe that.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment