Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Changes and the Future


Spies are in the government back then and today. The Barack Obama administration wants to create an intelligence officer training program in colleges and universities. This can function like the Reserve Officers' Training Corps that are run by the military services. The idea behind this system is to create a stream of "first and second generation Americans" who have critical language plus cultural knoweldge skills in order to prepare them to have careers in the intelligence agencies. Dennis C. Blair, who is the Director of the National Intelligence group have described this intelligence group in this fashion. The CIA in recent years and other intelligence agencies have had a hard time in finding qualified recruits who can work the streets of the Middle East and South Asia (in order to penetrate terrorist groups and criminal enterprises). The proposed program is an effort to cultivate and educate a new generation of career intelligence officers from diverse backgrounds ethnically and culturally. The proposal is included in the administration's 2010 intelligence authorization bill. Colleges and universities would apply for grants that would be used to expand or introduce courses of study to "meet the emerging needs of the intelligence community." Those courses would include certain foreign languages, analysis and specific scientific and technical fields. A person familiar with the program said that the students' participating in the program would be secret, so foreign intelligence services can't identified the people in it. People compete for financial assistance. Students participating in colleges and universities would agree to take the specialized courses that would apply to the national intelligence director for admittance to the program. Much like the support provided to those in the military programs, the financial assistance could include "a monthly stipend, tuition assistance, book allowances and travel expenses," according to the proposal. It also would involve paid summer internships at one or more intelligence agencies. People would pass a security background investigation in order to be in the intelligence training program. Students would get a certain amount of financial assistance, then they would be obligated to serve in an intelligence agency for the same length of time as they recieved their subsidy. The intelligence program wants to recruit sophomores and junios, while typically military programs have students who participated in all 4 years of college. Grants in colleges and universities have made intelligence agencies to develop partnerships with academia (and specific professors. Some of these professors worked as channels for recommending applicants to the CIA plus other intelligence agencies). The intelligence community already has a Centers of Academic Excellence Program that funds programs in national security studies at more than 14 colleges and universities, with a goal of having 20 participating schools by 2015. The programs receive between $500,000 and $750,000 a year. The National Security Agency had similar programs from 2004 that had students to do cryptologic training. A second program provided financial assistance to selected intelligence community employees who agreed to study in specialized academic areas in which officials believed there were analytic deficiencies. Named the Pat Roberts Intelligence Scholars Program, after the Kansas Republican who chaired the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, over the past four years it has provided funds to some 800 students and current employees. The director of national intelligence desires ot make the Roberts program permanent under the new proposal. He wants to expand it beyond analysts (in order to include acquisition, science, and technology). This can be used to recruit employees by reimbursing them for prior education in critical areas. So, intelligence agencies recruiting students to work for the federal government is never new.





CS Lewis' whole name is Clive Staples Lewis. Many people think that he was a strong Christian that wrote fictional literature for children. Yet, more evidence proves that he was a modernist and he embraced things that no where relates to Biblical Christianity. He was an Anglican, then an atheist, and then he was rumored to be a closet Catholic before he died. He went to a priest regularly for confession. He recieved the sacrament of extreme unction on July 16, 1963. Only Catholics can recieve this sacrament. Lewis stuided on medieval literature, mythology, and the occult. He claimed that paganism is the origin of religion when it's blasphemy to assume that God's truth originated from paganism. Early man acknowledged the existence of an All Powerful God. Surprised by Joy on pgs 176 and 177 claimed that CS Lewis believed that pagans (like even a Buddhist) may belong to God without known it. The Bible says that salvation is done in the name of Jesus Christ. He believes in salvation by works and a form of theistic evolution. Lewis was apart of a group of writers called the Inklings (along with Charles Williams and J.R.R. Tolkien). Charles Williams was apart of the occult Qabablistic Order of the Golden Dawn (they adhered to communication with the spirit world, and some allied with Luciferian Madame HP Blavatsky). The Chronicles of Naria is CS Lewis' famous work. The book obviously tries to glorify occult ideas. Naria was based on a real town called Narni in Italy. Lewis wrote about "All Narnians swear by him" when Jesus Christ taught us not to swear at all. In the Disney film of NARIA there is a man dressed up as Pan (which is a Nature god and is a well known archetype of Satan) talking with a little girl in a suggestive way. Some interpret one scene as a man acting as a pedophile in trying to lure a young girl into his home.





Health care is a controversial issue in America. Many points of view exist in the health care debate on how to allow to an increase of access while increasing coverage in our health care system. Some debate whether a public or private national plan is most feasable in society. There is also the issue of premiums and a proposed singer payer system. The deal is that people believe that increased taxes or other sacrifices would be needed in other to fund a more public health care system. Barack Obama denies that he desires a total government run health care system, but his critics believes that he wants to increase the government's role in controlling our health care system. Prince Hall Freemason and Roman Catholic Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) wants a mandate and people to pay if they refuse to become apart of the system. Madame Secretary Clinton, while still a New York senator, said that national health care had to be mandated and that garnishing wages was the only way to fix those who remained non-compliant, so the idea isn’t new. Even Barack Obama in 2008 rejected the theft of wages in order to fund a new health care reform proposal. Some believe that the Obama health care plan is a mandate. The reason is that all Americans without insurance will be required to purchase the government's "afforable" health insurance. There are waivers for the poor being considered. Barack Obama and his allies are considering taxing certain health insurance benefits (against the value of an employer provided plan or benefits recieved by upper level income taxpayers) as an option for garnering even more for the health care plan. So, the health care problem should be solved, yet it's difficult in finding a real solution. All Americans should have health care. Barack Obama's plan will cost at leat 1 trillion dollars. Yet, even those that want a mostly public health care don't want a total government run in health care. Alternative solutions would be to ban flouride, aspartame, and other poisons in our water supply. You can expand healthcare by tax credits and deductions. Also, there should be more access to Health Savings accounts, promote health privacy, and have individual choice (that ends corporate-controlled medical industry and a government run health care system).






Bill O'Reilly had exposed the abortionist George Tiller, while condemning his death. I agree with him on these points (like that Tiller made casual abortions and that partial birth abortion is murderous and evil). Yet, he has made one serious error in this situation. Bill O'Reilly has repeatedly asserted that the over 60,000 abortions done by George Tiller (that was apart of late term abortions) were legal. Bill O'Reilly also called the unborn babies as potential life. That's wrong of course. The unborn babies are human beings and are apart of life. They aren't potential lives. George Tiller as we know killed innocent human beings. Killing unborn babies in the first trimester is bad enough, but killing unborn babies babies in the third trimester for casual reasons is blatantly immoral. Kansas may have laws that condoned some of these abortion procedures, but there is a different between moral and immoral laws. Certainly, ripping a baby's body parts out if an unjust law. Even Dr. Martin Luther King, William Blackstone, and others exposed that unjust laws aren't in harmony with the law of God. Hitler's laws were legal, but they were immoral and unjustified. Just because someone is called apart of the law, doesn't mean it's legitimate since many evils then and now are legalized. So, the unborn isn't a potential life (or viable fetuses), it's human life since the moment of conception. 3-D and recently 4-D technology have proven the unique, human life of the unborn. Fetus is a term utilized by the pro-abortion crowd in order to dehumanize the unborn human being inside of a mother's womb. The Constitution doesn't support abortion at all. Jane Chastain has written a note to Bill O'Reilly about this issue. Bill O'Reilly "The No Spin Zone" is the number show on cable since people like controversy. Among his show, controversy is ever apparent. He's right on some issues and wrong on others. He is definitely wrong in supporting the neo-con's war on terror agenda, torture (which he calls "harsh interrogations' in a slick way), and refuse to allow torture pictures to be shown publicly. Tiller's death was evil, yet pro-lifers aren't blamed for it. Salon's Joan Walsh demonized pro-lifers collectively for Tiller's death in an evil way. So, the abortionists aren't going to get away with use faulty terminology nowadays. Australia legalizes abortion up until birth. Abortion is still murder.






Dissent is being opposed all of the time by some in the federal government. Washington via the Department of Homeland Security, etc. have tarred people who oppose the policies of the administration as "right wing extremists." The mostly liberal media like the New York Times have done the campaign to demonize and call for the criminalization of political dissent. These calls are accelerating. In early June, New York Times columnists Frank Rich and Paul Krugman wrote pieces that blamed the murder of an abortionist (and a Holocaust Museum security guard) at President Barack Obama's critics. That's a lie since the murderers are responsible not all conservatives, libertarians, independents, etc. Many leftists agree with both men. The Huffington Post's Dennis Palumbo called Rich's column as gribbing. He said that dissent is equated to hate speech. The leftist People for the American Way agreed with the collectively blaming of pro-lifers, conservatives, etc. for these tradegies. Columnists from the New York Daily News and Salon.com published similar sentiments. The Rev. Jesse Jackson took up the familiar gun-control theme in the Chicago Sun-Times. Bob Herbert's column in June 19th said the same thing, which is entitled, "A Threat We Can't Ignore." He said that we should shut up if we criticize Barack Obama. No, Herbert, we will never shut up. As long as we have breath, we will dissent with any evil or any bad policy in the world. Herbert said that the NRA isn't directly to blame for the murder of the security guard in the Holocaust Museum, but they should end their message. I don't agree with the NRA anti-gun stance on some issues, but even they have a right to show their message. The Barack Obama administration (especially its cabinet members) have express their goals limiting the rights of the Constitution's Second Amednment unto people. See, Herbert doesn't say shut up to those who once disagreed with Bush, but toward those who dissent with the policies of President Barack Obama. He's a hypocrite. Herbert said that there is no Obama gun ban law, but Obama has supported real restrictions on gun rights that affects law abiding citizens. That's real. He wants to blame the NRA for ignoring lessons of history. This is faulty since real history proves that dictatorships have ban the gun rights of citizens (even Jim Crow and Black Code laws restricted the 2nd Amendment rights of innocent black Americans decades ago). The DHS "Right Wing Extremism" document said that lone ranger types can be incited to do terrorism. This paranoia is sick, because they use stereotypes and distortions in advancing their agenda. The truth is that murderers don't always have a cohorent motive in their evil. Not everyone who is a "lone ranger" is some potential murderer or terrorist. The Department of Homeland Security also sought to demonize left-wing critics of Washington policies with its own report on “Leftwing Extremists,” which was written shortly before the report on “Rightwing Extremism.” The DHS demonizes even legitimate anti-war or left wing organization as well, so it isn't just one ideology. So, some in the government are explicitly trying to suppress dissent and we should oppose that agenda completely.







BBC from June 21, 2009 reported that the Justice Department is trying to stop a lawsuit to return Geronimo's remains held at the Skulls and Bones' headquarters in Yale. U.S. officials have moved to block a legal bid by descendants of the Apache leader Gernomino to have his remains reburied. Gernomino's relatives say that some body parts were stolen in about 100 years ago by members of a secret society that is linked to Yale University to keep in their clubhouse. Their relatives want to rebury the warrior, who died in 1909 near his birthplace in New Mexico. The Justice Department has asked a federal judge to dismiss their lawsuit. This is wild, because people have a right to return the theft of a dead Native American's body if that body was stolen from the Skulls and Bones Secret Society. The Skulls and Bones was created in 1832 by William Huntington Russell and his fellow classmate Alphonso Taft. Russell wanted to revive the Mysteries in America during the time of the fervent anti-Masonic movement. In fact, in the early 1800's was the peak of the anti-Masonic Movement, which was after the unjust murder of William Morgan by Freemasons. For most of its history, Skull & Bones operated as a peer society with Scroll and Key and, later, Wolf's Head, two of Yale's other property-owning senior societies. Skull and Bones also owns a campground island in the St. Lawrence River in upstate New York named Deer Island. "The 40-acre (160,000 m2) retreat is intended to give Bonesmen an opportunity to 'get together and rekindle old friendships.' A century ago the island sported tennis courts and its softball fields were surrounded by rhubarb plants and gooseberry bushes. Today, the Skulls and Bones is one easy way to expose the new world order. This group have secret ceremonies for new member where they bow in front of a Pope figure, they lay in a tomb, and do other strange rituals. Some of their members are famous in the intelligence community, education, the corporate world, and other spheres of influence. The most famous Bonesmen are of course George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush. These 2 men represent what the Skulls and Bones are all about. The Skulls and Bones use feign piety as an excuse to promote control in society. Their history is famous for being complicit in the Opium trade, the Civil War, and funding the Nazis. Prescott Bush and Averill Harriman are Bonesmen who financially aided Hitler and the Nazis. Prescott Bush is George W. Bush's grandfather. Today, the Skulls and Bones are very active today. They recruit from students in Yale University. Not suprisingly, some from Yale are in the elite. The truth about the Skulls and Bones' true history and agenda has been exposed greatly for a number of years. I have written about this subject in great detail in 2003. Later, in 2009, I written more information about the Bonesmen group. They now accept even women and those of other backgrounds.




Free Speech is under threat everywhere not just in America. The feds want to get power to target websites against so-called "false claims." There are new FTC guidelines that would allow the government to scruntinize the content of websites and patrol what blogger say or do. The FTC is more worried about snopping into the financial affairs of bloggers who make a few bucks of affiliate relationships than worry about the Federal Reserve refusing to disclose where trillions of dollars in bailout money went. These proposed guidelines are set to be introduced later this year that could give the government a backdoor way to regulate and shut down blogs for making "false claims." “New guidelines, expected to be approved late this summer with possible modifications, would clarify that the agency can go after bloggers — as well as the companies that compensate them — for any false claims or failure to disclose conflicts of interest,” states an Associated Press report. The government are silly to be furious at struggling families who are supplementing their income by having housewives write blogs about cooking or individuals just posting political opinions (along with funding their operation by carrying affiliate links to Amazon books). The new FTC regulations want any blog to be scrutinized not just ones that specialize in reviews. The proposed guidelines lie and believe that what they classify as "deceptive speech" is not protected by the First Amendment. The First Amendment have always protected unpopular speech and the Supreme Court has supported most speech in our society. Also, there is an issue that such speech is deceptive will be decided by the government itself. The definition of "false claims" can be ambigiously defined that can allows the feds to shut down any website with the flimsiest of pretexts. As the Cryptogon website points out, in reality this has little to do with the FTC’s concern for fair business practices and everything to do with the government getting a foot in the door for their overarching agenda to regulate and control blogs and free speech on the Internet. So that means that the government can ban or heavily restrict a blog if they find it distasteful according to the government or the traditional media. Blogs have been one of many sources that have shown the real truth in the world. We don't need an atmosphere where people can't make up their own websites or blogs freely. We don't need a moutain of red tape and bureaucracy in order to just create a blog. Some believe that the endgame of these circumstances is to allow total government regulation and censorship of the Internet (including the regulation of every blogger in America with a number and prermission to blog. This is very similar or akin to the policy of the anti-Internet Chinese government). This proposal can allow bloggers to have their blogs terminated if their views are unsavory according to the dictates of the government. Now, free speech ought to be maintain and not restricted by the federal government at all.






By Timothy

No comments: