For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well. My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them.
-Psalm 139:13-16
The History of Abortion
Abortion is murder as we all know. I don't care what the mainstream media says. When you shed innocent blood and rip out body parts of an unborn human being, you're killing that human being. In order to understand the evil dynamics of abortion, it's vital to understand a crisp history of its origin. Even in the days of the Old Testament, the Torah forbade abortion procedures since abortion is about the intentional murder of unborn human life in the womb. There is plenty of medicial evidence to confirm that unborn human life is complex in the womb from where it begins during conception. In conception, human DNA exists in the zygote. By 6 to 8 weeks, the baby in the womb had very complex organs. It's easy to see in the Bible that God knew or comprehended the destiny of nations (including the paths of people) form the womb. In Exodus 34:5-7, there God is called merciful. The Hebrew word for merciful in that passage is called rachum. Rachamim is Hebrew for mercy. Now, this passage confirms an aspect of God being merciful. This character was to to the prophet Moses on Mount Sinai. Ironically, racham is the root word for the Herbrew word for womb called rachum. So, in the Hebrew language, the womb was a place of mercy. This is where a child was formed in the image of God and it was born from. The womb is a holy place. Exodus 21:22-25 is a verse talking about abortion. Before going forward, here are the verses:
"....Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.
22 ¶ If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe..."
One view of these verses is that it describes that abortion is wrong and that aborting a fetus by a fight against a woman is a serious matter. The term for miscarriage is not used in this text, but the normal term for a live child birth. The text makes no distinction between the harm done either to the mother or the child. Even if this text solely outlines a miscarriage (as pro abortionists maintain), this text and no text in the Bible condones abortion at all. This text conclusively prove that the death of an infant is evil and a penalty ought to be required. Another view of these verses is that abortion is wrong and is equated to murder. This text refers to an accidential injury, while abortion is purposeful destruction of innocent human life in the womb. The Torah doesn't issue the death penalty for accidental death normally. The text doesn't even dehumanize the unborn, but outlines punishments for a crime. From the Bible, God knew the plan of Jeremiah before being formed in the belly of the womb. God hates the shedding of innocent blood. (Exodus 23:7, Proverbs 6:16-19, Isaiah 5:20-21). To abort a baby is to kill an innocent. Abortion is the epitome of shedding innocent blood and murdering human beings. The Law of Moses says clearly: "...Thou shalt not Kill..." The baby is inside of the womb with a different blood than the mother's, seperate brainwaves, and different human DNA making it seperate and independent from the mother being a person. God the Son was in Mary's womb. Mary was poor and lived in harsh circumstances so does Mary des erves an abortion possessing the right to choose? Is Jesus inside of Mary's womb, part of Mary's body? Are the prophets of the OT deserve abortion if their mothers are poor, born out of wedlock, sick mothers, etc. The answers to these questions are of course No. Abortion is borderline blasphemy since innocent life is degraded and it disrespects Christ's birth with a poor family being God in the flesh. Abortion is just directly an interference to the potential of all human life leading to a great life following God. There is a possibilty that the aborted child could be the world's next great leader, but we may never know or witness that since that life is gone. Numerous great men and women who existed in human history have survived abortions.
Now, pagan cultures throughout thousands of years have performed abortions and sacrificed their own human infants to false gods. They do this as apart of a ritual in their deluded belief that these false gods can return favors they ask of them. Abortion was and is a sacrifice of innocent human life for the conveience or needs of others. One of the most famous stories in the Old Testament that describes child sacrifice was the worship of Molech. Molech is the Caananite diety that is described as image of a ox, cow, bull, etc. It was worshipped by Semitic tribes like the Ammonites, Edomites and the Moabites. Molech has been called Baal as well. Moloch, Molech, Molekh, or Molek, representing semitic מלך m-l-k, (a root which occurs in various Hebrew and Arabic words related to kings) is either the name of a god or the name of a particular kind of sacrifice associated with fire. Jeremiah 32:35 referes to Molech as passing through the fire in rituals. These ritual violate the authority and commandments of God. The OT gives stern punishments against apostate Jewish people participating in the rituals of Molech completely. The 12th century rabbi Rashi, commenting on Jeremiah 7:31 stated:
"..Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might not be moved..."
Now, Roman and Greek sources also prove that Baal relates to offering children to be murdered in a fire as sacrficies in the city of Carthage in North Africa. The Caananites or the Phoenicians established colonies in North Africa, Spain, and possibly Britian. Molech's other names include Apis Bull, the Golden Calf, and Chemosh. Baal and Molech are equivalent dieities according to modern archaeologists and anthropologists. Baal's female consort (which exist in numerous Mystery Religions) was Asherah and the wife of Molech was Ashteroth. Both of these goddesses are fertility beings that have influences in the origin of the pagan day of Easter. This false goddess archetype is called Aphrodite in ancient Greece, Isis for Egypt, and Tanet for the Phoenicians. Human sacrifice existed throughout history. It was found in northern Africa, India, Europe, ancient America, Asia, etc. In ancient Hinduism, Kali was the goddess of death and destruction. She seeked human health to eat in mythology. Ancient Celtic and Germanic tribes had human sacrifice as well. The Roman historian, Tacitus, records that one of the ancestors of the English speaking peoples, or the Angles, sacrificed to the Mother Earth Goddess. In his Germania, On the Origin and Geography of Germany, Tacitus describes this gruesome ritual as “a ceremony performed by slaves who are immediately afterward drowned in the lake.” The Vedas spoke of the desire for human sacrifice as well. The Aztecs ritually sacrifices so many humans that the Spanish conquistador imperalists massacred the Aztecs, tore down their temple, and built a cathedral in its place. These cultures wanted to do these sick rituals in order to appease the "gods," which don't exist at all.
Sacrifice to any other god was condemned as idolatry:
“They shall no more offer their sacrifices to demons, after whom they have played the harlot. This shall be as statute forever for them throughout their generations” (Leviticus 17:7).
Plato, Aristotle to Seneca, Quintilian, Pythagoras, Aristophanes, Livy, Cicero, Herodotus, Thucydides, Plutarch, and Euripides were either silent or supported child killing in the ancient world. Plato explicitly endorse child killing if a child had a physical or mental condition. Some back then used abortion and child killing as casually as eating food. Even the abandonment of children in the ancient world was a common occurence. We do know that the early Church during the times of the Roman Empire opposed infanticide and abortion in full effect. There is no question about it. Here's sources proving it:
1). 150 AD Didache "The second commandment of the teaching: You shall not murder. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not seduce boys. You shall not commit fornication. You shall not steal. You shall not practice magic. You shall not use potions. You shall not procure [an] abortion, nor destroy a newborn child" (Didache 2:1)
2). 170 AD Mark Felix "There are some women among you who by drinking special potions extinguish the life of the future human in their very bowels, thus committing murder before they even give birth." (Mark Felix, Christian Lawyer, Octavius chap. 30)
3). 177 AD Athenagoras "What man of sound mind, therefo re, will affirm, while such is our character, that we are murderers? . . . [W]hen we say that those women who use drugs to bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God for the abortion, on what principle should we commit murder? For it does not belong to the same person to regard the very fetus in the womb as a created being, and therefore an object of God's care, and when it has passed into life, to kill it; and not to expose an infant, because those who expose them are chargeable with child-murder, and on the other hand, when it has been reared to destroy it" (A Plea for the Christians 35, Embassy chap. 5).
177 AD Athenagoras, "What reason would we have to commit murder when we say that women who induce abortions are murderers, and will have to give account of it to God? For the same person would not regard the fetus in the womb as a living thing and therefore an object of God's care, and at the same time slay it, on ce it had come to life." (Athenagoras Plea, ch.35)
4). 210 AD Tertullian "In our case, a murder being once for all forbidden, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the human being derives blood from the other parts of the body for its sustenance. To hinder a birth is merely a speedier man-killing; nor does it matter whether you take away a life that is born, or destroy one that is coming to birth. That is a man which is going to be one; you have the fruit already in its seed" (Apology 9:8).
210 AD Tertullian "Now we allow that life begins with conception because we contend that the soul also begins from conception; life taking its commencement atthe same moment and place that the soul does" (Apology 27).
210 AD Tertullian "The law of Moses, indeed, punishes with due penalties the man who shall cause abortion [Ex. 21:22]
5). 226 AD Minucius Felix "There are some [pagan] women who, by drinking medical preparations, extinguish the source of the future man in their very bowels and thus commit a parricide before they bring forth. And these things assuredly come down from the teaching of your [false] gods. . . . To us [Christians] it is not lawful either to see or hear of homicide" (Octavius 30).
6). 228 AD Hippolytus "Women who were reputed to be believers began to take drugs to render themselves sterile, and to bind themselves tightly so as to expel what was being conceived, since they would not, on account of relatives and excess wealth, want to have a child by a slave or by any insignificant person. See, then, into what great impiety that lawless one has proceeded, by teaching adultery and murder at the same time!" (Refutation of All Heresies).
So, the early church viewed abortion as a punishable crime. The ancient Roman Empire has an ambigious view on abortion early on. Some ancient Romans even approved of it. Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Origen, and Irenaeus especially wanted punishments for abortion. Even the Old Testament forbade killing innocent human life. Later on, the Roman Empire was more anti-infanticide. The Emperor Valentianian called infanticide a capital crime in 374 A.D. The Emperor Justinian was of the Byzantinum Empire. He allowed the legal code of Corpus Luris to exist. Now, this code influences American and Western law to this day. This code even equate the unborn to those humans that have been born. The Code of Justinian punishes people who commit abortion with murder. Basil of Caesarea lived in the 300's to 400's A.D. Basil was very intelligent with an encyclopedia-like mind. He studied in all the great schools of his day—in Caesarea, Constantinople, Athens, and Rome. When he found out that a legal abortion trade (the abortionists of his time were called the sagae. Herbs and surgicial procedures were enacted as abortion procedures during that era) was occuring, he enacted solutions immediately in order to stop this problem. He preached sermons that rejected abortion as murder. He provided crisis pregnancy centers to help women. He even set up charities and a hospital for people suffering. Basil helped to pass anti-abortion laws, he set up education systems, and he did other things. Hearing of Basil’s solitary crusade, the Emperor Valentinian took the first step toward the full criminalization of child-killing in 374 by decreeing, “All parents must support their children conceived; those who brutalize or abandon them should be subject to the full penalty prescribed by law.”
In the Middle Ages, Christianity influenced the development of pro-life laws. English Common Law and the Blackstone Commentaries were pro-life. The Founders like Thomas Jefferson (who said that the Blackstone's Commentaries were as revered as Muslims rever the Quran) utilized Blackstone's Commentaries as an excellent source of information. Sir William Blackstone was an excellent legal scholar in the 1700's. As Sir William Blackstone pointed out in his famous 1765 volumes titled Commentaries on the Laws of England:
"Life is the immediate gift of God, a right inherent by nature in every individual.... It begins, in contemplation of law, as soon as an infant is able to stir in the mother's womb..." (W. Blackstone: Commentaries on the Laws of England, Chicago: University Press, 1979 rep. I pp. 125f. See too Justice Tom C. Clark: The Law As It Governs Decisions Today (in Spitzer & Saylor: op. cit., p. 359). He also calls those who perform abortion as committing homicide or manslaughter:
"...For if a woman is quick with child, and by a potion or otherwise killeth it in her womb - or if any one beat her, whereby the child dieth in her body and she is delivered of a dead child -this...was by the antient law homicide or manslaughter [Exodus 21:22f &] Bracton 3:21."
He said that those who willfully murder another innocent human being deserve death. The French Revolution was a time when Judeo-Christian values were based in favor of terrorism, abortion, suppression of religious liberty, and a disrespect for the value of life. The supporters of the French Revolution include Voltaire. He believe in the enlightenment view that man doesn't need God to help his situation. He wanted an "Age of Reason" to the point of almost worshipping science. Louis XIV was the king in that time period. He believed that someone was strange with male members of the court dying. His detective Gabriel de La Reynie, was the Lieutenant General of the police in Versaille. Gabriel found that a witch named la Voisin who provided the poisons that were responsible for the deaths. This investigation also uncovered a network of abortion services connected with satanic rituals. La Voisin performed Satanic rituals to kill premature infants (using their blood in a chalice, etc.). Premature infants are obviously victims of abortion attempts. A court testimony exposed La Voisin praising Ashteroth and Asmodeus. Ashteroth as it is proven is a fertility goddess, who is the wife of Molech (which is involved in child sacrifice). Asmodeus is a transliteration of the Hebrew name for a demon that is normally associated with lust. Aborted children were being sacrificed in a satanic ritual designed to empower the practitioners. At her trial, la Voisin confessed that no less than 2,500 babies had been disposed of in this manner. Ironically, many Wiccans today love abortion as apart of a sacrifice (and others deny this). They don't worship Satan in the Christian view of it, but they are polytheists. That means they worship the horned god Pan, goddesses, etc. Although the vast majority of Wiccans deny that they have anything to do with the practice of child sacrifice (they claim to worship Nature and false gods plus goddesses alone), Wiccans are hard pressed to explain the emergence of a small minority of witches, such as Ginnette Paris, who writes in The Sacrament of Abortion:
“It is morally acceptable that a woman who gives life may also destroy life … whoever kills a fetus commits a murder…." (Ginnette Paris, The Sacrament of Abortion, Spring Publications, P.O. Box 222069, Dallas, TX 75222, 1992, pp.53, 56, 107).
The Reign of Terror banned Christian services and used different names for days of the week. Bible believing people in Britian and America condemned the French Revolution as promoting nihilism and the suppression of individual liberty, especially religious liberty. In fact, most of the English speaking Western world opposed abortion until the early part of the 20th century. America was the jewel for the globalists for force abortion unto after some of the European nations supported it in their laws. As many realize the dictatorships of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany each supported abortion. The Soviet Union was the first country to legalize abortion in the modern European era in 1920 under Vladimir Lenin. They legalized it again in 1955. Conservative estimates put the Russian abortion rate at 60% of all pregnancies, approximately a tenth of which are on girls under 18. A 2000 report from the World Health Organization revealed that "Russia and Central-Eastern Europe, with roughly 10 percent of the global population, accounts for up to a third of the 30 million to 40 million abortions registered annually around the world." This is one of the many reasons why Russia today has an underpopulation crisis (i.e. few people are being born in Russia). In the 1930's, the Nazis legalized abortion for non-Aryan women. This was a crucial part of their eugenics program, which was carried out by Josef Mengele and others. Mengele committed such sick experiments that even today, they are called disturbing. In 1938, Sweden legalized abortion. In America, the seeds for federal support of abortion came in the early 20th century. Between 1948 and 1956, 11 European nations legalized abortion at the behest of Planned Parenthood according to George Grant.
Margaret Sanger was a famous eugenicist, who lived in America. She was funded by the Rockefeller banking establishment. Sanger followed Theosophy, Rosicrucianism, and went into a KKK rally in 1926. She claimed to just support birth control, but authors like George Grant proved something different. She used "birth control" as an excuse to promote depopulation, decreasing even legal immigration into America, and segregation. She wanted the segragation of those who were mentally ill, disabled, etc. from the general population via her Plan of Peace. This is wicked for all humans deserve real contact with each other irrespective or their background or disability. In 1932, Sanger proposed that a Population Congress be convened for the purpose of giving "certain dysgenic groups" — including, but not limited to, "morons, mental defectives, [and] epileptics" the choice of "segregation or sterilization." A second group, which would include "illiterates, paupers, unemployables," as well as various types of criminals, would be consigned to "farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct" — in other words, to an American gulag. All told, Sanger believed that "between fifteen and twenty million Americans [should have been] segregated or sterilized," observes Meehan. The April 1933 issue of Sanger’s Birth Control Review, which was devoted to the subject of eugenic sterilization, featured an article by Dr. Ernst Rudin, a high official of the Nazi regime. Margaret Sanger never fired or rebuked many of her Birth Control staff members from making racist remarks and supporting the Nazis. I have their quotes saying this, so this isn't a lie. After WWII, the Rockefeller Foundation used their money in America to promote population control, abortion, and other forms of eugenics. Some of this funding was covert, because of the horrors that eugenics did in World War II (by Hitler, the Nazis, etc.). In America, abortion was started to be promoted even more with the birth of thalidomide babies. This was about when children was born with misshapen limb, dim hearing, and other bad effects. This occured in the late 1950's and early 1960's, because preganant women were using the dangerous thalidomide drug during their pregnancies. Thousands of these children exist in this time. Many mothers have won lawsuits after they took these thalodomide pills as early as 2 or 3 weeks after conception. There were Supreme Court cases that promoted the rights of the unborn in the early 1960's even if they were born with disorders.
A rather important legal decision, was that in the 1960 case of Sinkler v. Kneale. There, a 'mongoloid' child was born with Downs' Syndrome - allegedly as a result of injuries received when she was a previable and only one-month-old fetus, at a time which her mother was the victim of an automobile collision caused by the negligence of the defendant motorist.
In that case, as Mr. Justice Bok pertinently observed, "medical authorities have long recognized that a child was in existence from the moment of conception" - in existence as an individual human being distinct from his or her mother, "and not merely a part of its mother's body" until some unspecified time after conception. Then the Justice astutely added: "As for the notion that [to collect damages] the child must have been viable when the injuries were received" - a notion which had claimed attention in several of the United States - "we regard it as having little to do with the basic right to recover, when the fetus is regarded as having existence as a separate creature from the moment of conception."
In the 1967 case of Torigian v. Watertown News Co., the court gave damages to a pregnant mother whose unborn baby was injuried (via a moving truck hitting it). This outlined that human value of the unborn. By the 1967, England legalized abortion in their Abortion Act of 1967. It legalized abortion even if the child should have physical or mental abnormalities (including the ambigious words of the physical or mental health of the mother which can be a cold or a headache). By 1970, many states legalized abortion, especially in New York (under Governor John D. Rockefeller). By 1972, almost 500,000 abortions were carried out in America that were called "legal." Abortionists in the late 1960's and early 1970's over exaggerated illegal abortions in order to promote their agenda. Dr. Bernard Nathanson was a founding member of the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL), which is now the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League. He is pro-life now. Dr. Nathanson admitted that: "Our favorite tack was to blame the church for the death of every woman from a botched abortion," recalls Nathanson. "There were perhaps three hundred or so deaths from criminal abortions annually in the United States in the sixties, but NARAL in its press releases claimed to have data that supported a figure of five thousand." Not to mention that legal abortions kills dozens of women per year today. Any death from abortion is still tragic. Abortion isn't safe.
Roe V. Wade was passed in 1973. It was a landmark decision (It effected all 50 states in America). It falsely equated the words found in the Fourteenth Amendment as to do child killing in the womb. Its companion case of Doe v. Bolton was also decided at the same time. Roe legalized abortion federally throughout the pregnancy with limited exceptions. Roe allowed child killing in the first trimester between the physician and the mother. The second trimester, abortion could happen for almost any reason (states can restrict abortion in the 3rd trimester unless to protect the life or health of the mother). Under Doe v. Bolton, however, health is defined, and the definition is so broad ("medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age") that abortion is effectively legal until birth. The Roe decision has a long history. In 1970, attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of Norma L. McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). At the time, McCorvey claimed her pregnancy was the result of rape, but she later claimed that she had lied. So, Roe v. Wade was based on lies. McCorvey never got an abortion. She had a little talk with Weddington or Coffee until her baby was over a year old. In in the Doe case, Mary Doe didn't have an abortion. Her ACLU lawyer Margie Pitts Maes lied and said that Sandra Cano (aka Doe) didn't have the money to get an abortion (yet, Mary Doe didn't want it). The day before she was scheduled to abort her baby, she ran away. She later gave birth to a daughter. Now, Sandra Cano admitted in 1989 that Doe vs. Bolton was based on lies. The good news is that Sandra Cano is against abortion today. The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. The district court ruled in McCorvey's favor, but it didn't create an injuncation against the laws that restrict abortion. Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court on appeal. Chief Justice Warren Burger proposed that the case be reargued; this took place on October 11, 1972. Weddington continued to represent Roe, and Texas Assistant Attorney General Robert C. Flowers stepped in to replace Wade. The Supreme Court voted in favor of McCorvey 7 to 2. The opinion in favor of Roe was written by Justice Henry Blackman. He equated abortion to privacy. Blackmun cited Glanville Williams' book entitled, "The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law." Ironically, Williams was a member of the Eugenics Society (and he taught law at Cambridge University). In 1954, the Eugenics Society voted to support the Abortion Law Reform Association, which set out to remove legal restrictions against abortion. Williams became president of the ALRA from 1962, and was successful within a few years. This allow the British law was changed in 1967 to support abortion. So, Blackmun used the biased words of an eugenicist as a means to justify supporting the evil decision of Roe v. Wade. Associate Justices Byron R. White and William H. Rehnquist wrote emphatic dissenting opinions in this case. Justice White wrote that:
"..I find nothing in the language or history of the Constitution to support the Court's judgment. The Court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion statutes. The upshot is that the people and the legislatures of the 50 States are constitutionally disentitled to weigh the relative importance of the continued existence and development of the fetus, on the one hand, against a spectrum of possible impacts on the mother, on the other hand. As an exercise of raw judicial power, the Court perhaps has authority to do what it does today; but, in my view, its judgment is an improvident and extravagant exercise of the power of judicial review that the Constitution extends to this Court..." (Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973). Findlaw.com. Retrieved 2007-01-26. )
White believes the Supreme Court values the life of a pregnant mother more than the existence of human life she carries, which is true. Rehnquist wrote that the scope of the Fouteenth Amendment doesn't explicitly deal with abortion at all. The dissenting Justices believe that abortion should be left up to the people or the states. Also, back in that time, there wasn't technology to improve the quality of life. Restricting life without due process is a violation of the Constitution since we can't deprive life without due process. In the final analysis, abortion is a form of eugenics. Writing in the Fall 1998 issue of Human Life Review, author Mary Meehan observes that, according to the accepted version of history, "brave civil libertarians and women’s rights advocates, encouraged by liberating currents in the 1960s, dared to raise the abortion issue in public and to prompt serious debate about it....The U.S. Supreme Court gave them a huge victory with its 1973 Roe v Wade decision." However, continues Meehan, "A wealth of inside information, now available in private and government archives, suggests that the eugenics movement (devoted to breeding a ‘better’ human race) led to population control, which in turn had enormous influence on the legalization of abortion.... Moreover, far from fighting a lonely battle, abortion supporters received enormous aid from the American establishment or ‘power elite." Abortion is also eugenics since eugenics views human life as having scales of values (In their false minds, people of certain races are inferior to other races or have less value than others). Abortion views human life as having a varying scale of value (i.e. Many pro-abortionists view the unborn as having less human value than a born baby). Most importantly, the whole idea of humanity accumulating over time, from zero person at conception through various levels of value in each trimester up to 100% person at birth, is eugenics. The idea of evolution through stages from insignificance to humanity is pure eugenics, based on Darwin's theories. The whole trimester scheme in Roe v. Wade, with different rules at three stages in pregnancy, is blatantly arbitrary, and that has always struck pro-lifers as a fatal flaw in the decision. Human life and human rights aren't decided by a social contract. They exist from the hand of God. Roe. v. Wade denies the instrinstic, equal value of all life from conception unto death.
In the 21st century in 2009, we have the Presidency of Barack Obama. Some call him the most pro-abortion President in American history. Back in 2007, Barack Obama promised to the Rockefeller sponsored Planned Parenthood Action fund banquet that he would sign FOCA (or the Freedom of Choice Act. FOCA would potentially ban all pro-life laws nationwide according to pro-life). He didn't sign FOCA, but he passed an executive order to force taxpayers to fund abortions overseas. Obama mouthed sick words at a campaign speech in Johnstown PA that: "I have two daughters. If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby". Sorry, Obama, a baby isn't a punishment. It's a gift from God. Ironically, Planned Parenthood has huge abortion clinics in minoritty neighborhoods and Barack Obama is a black President. It's ironic because Obama could of been a target of abortion if he was born after 1973. According to a Fox TV story, "Blacks do, indeed, have much higher rates of abortions than whites or other minority groups. In 2000, while blacks made up 17 percent of live births, they made up more than twice that share of abortions (36 percent). If those aborted children had been born, the number of blacks born would have been slightly over 50 percent greater than it was. The comparison with whites and other minorities is striking. Whites made up 78 percent of live births, but only 57 percent of abortions. Non-black minorities had 7 percent of live births and 5 percent of abortions. Data from 1973 on indicate that black women's share of abortions has consistently been at least twice their share of live births." So, there is an abortion problem in communities in the world. Abortion is funded by the establishment not for the sake of promoting women's rights. It's funded as a means to breakdown marriage, promoting sexual promiscious behavior, and population control (under the guise of birth control). Companies benefit from seeing human bodies getting butchered. Nathanson himself estimates he's performed 75,000 abortions during his career as an abortionist. The average cost to the patient for an abortion is around $480.00 according to some sources. See, abortionists reap profit from death. The mother or the woman in general are never at fault for this evil abortion culture. It's the elite and their agents promoting it.
To end this section, here are sickos (and pro-new world order shills) advocating depopulation and eugenics in the world:
"There is no permanent status quo in nature; all is the process of adjustment and readjustment, or else eventual failure. But man is the first being yet evolved on earth which has the power to note this changefulness, and, if he will, to turn it to his own advantage, to work out genetic methods, eugenic ideas, yes, to invent new characteristics, organs, and biological systems that will work out to further the interests, the happiness, the glory of the God-like being whose meager foreshadowings we the present ailing creatures are."
- Herrman J. Muller, 1935 (an associate of Sir Julian Huxley)
"The first century or two of the new millennium will almost certainly be a golden age for Eugenics. Through application of new genetic knowledge and reproductive technologies…the major change will be to mankind itself…[T]echniques…such as…genetic manipulations are not yet efficient enough to be unquestionably suitable in therapeutic and eugenic application for humans. But with the pace of research it is surely only a matter of time, and a short time at that."
- Glayde Whitney, Reproduction Technology for a New Eugenics, paper for The Galton Institute conference Man and Society in the New Millennium, September 1999
"There is NO DENYING the natural world would be a better place without people - ALL people! Not a selective bunch. Get it straight."
- Rebecca Calisi, student of Eric Pianka
"No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child… without a permit for parenthood."
- Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) in her proposed The American Baby Code, intended to become law.
"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
- Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.
"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race."
- Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Margaret Sanger's December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon's Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.
"Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock."
- Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.
"Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems."
- Margaret Sanger. "The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda." Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.
Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud was one of the controversial minds in history. He was born from May 6, 1856 to September 23, 1939. Being an Austrian psychiatrist, he founded the pyschoanalytic school of psychology. Freud defined theories about the unconscious mind and the defense mechanism of repression. He developed the clinical practice of psychoanalysis by attempting to cure psychopathology by having a dialogue with a patient and a psychoanalyst. He believed that sexual desire was a motivition in human existence. He believes that dreams were sources of insight into people's unconscious desires. Sigmund Freud also research cerebral palsy. Some of his ideas were rejected by mainstream scientists. He is a Galician Jewish man who was born in Příbor, Austrian Empire. Freud was favored over his other slibins. He studied the medical faculty in the University of Vienna to study under Darwinist Professor Karl Claus. Freud enrolled at the University of Vienna in 1873. The origins of Freud’s basic model, based on the fundamentals of chemistry and physics, according to John Bowlby, stems from physiologist Ernst Wilhelm von Brücke (Brucke believed that a living organism is a dynamic system to which the laws of chemistry and physics apply), Meynert, Breuer, Helmholtz, and Herbart. Freud once tried hypnosis to deduce mental issues. He rejected it follow a procedure called "talking cure." This is about talking to locate and release emotional energy that Freud believed was trapped in the unconscious mind. He called the trapping in our mind of our hidden emotions as "psychosomatic symptoms." The "talking cure" is widely seen as the basis of psychoanalysis. After opening his own medical practice, specializing in neurology, Freud married Martha Bernays in 1886.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment