The government is slick nowadays. Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein is the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs czar. He outlined a plan to want the government to infiltrate conspiracy groups in order to undermine them (via postings on chat rooms and social networks as well as real meetings). This is according to a recently uncovered article that Sunstein wrote for the Journal of Political Philosophy. Chat rooms, social networks, and article comment sections are used by trolls a lot of times. Some of them try to debunk the truth about the new world order despite how documented it is. These talking points are represented by the military industrial complex and they won the corporate media networks in America. They have numerous programs aimed at infiltrating prominent Internet sites. They spread propaganda to counter the truth about the misdeed of the government plus the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2006, CENTCOm or the States Central Command told a team of employees would be hired to engage blogger that say information about the war on terro. The Pentagron in May of 2008 expanded Informatio Operations on the Internet by setting up fake foreign news websites. This is designed to look like independent media sources, but in reality carrying out direct military propaganda. Even countries like Israel admitted to forming an army of online trools to infiltrate anti-war websites and act for apologists about the errors of nations like Israel (even in war crimes). In January last year, the US Air Force announced a “counter-blog” response plan aimed at fielding and reacting to material from bloggers who have “negative opinions about the US government and the Air Force.” The plan, created by the public affairs arm of the Air Force, includes a detailed twelve-point “counter blogging” flow-chart that dictates how officers should tackle what are described as “trolls,” “ragers,” and “misguided” online writers. These new revelations prove that the Obama administation is deliberately targeting conspiracy groups as apart of a COINTELPRO style effort to silence the government's most vociferous and influential critics (as found in the Internet and the conspiracy truth mvoement). Cass Sunstein back in 2008 wrote an article in the Journal of Political Philosophy about a plan for the government to stealthily infiltrate groups that pose alternative theories on historical events via chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups. He wants to undermine those groups. He wants to break people people who hold on to such groups like 9/11 Truth organizations. He wants independent experts instead of people from the government to infiltrate people since government workers can be untrustworthy. “Put into English, what Sunstein is proposing is government infiltration of groups opposing prevailing policy,” writes Marc Estrin. “It’s easy to destroy groups with “cognitive diversity.” You just take up meeting time with arguments to the point where people don’t come back. You make protest signs which alienate 90% of colleagues. You demand revolutionary violence from pacifist groups.”This is what Sunstein is advocating when he writes of the need to infiltrate conspiracy groups and sow seeds of distrust amongst members in order to stifle the number of new recruits. This is classic “provocateur” style infiltration that came to the fore during the Cointelpro years, an FBI program from 1956-1971 that was focused around disrupting, marginalizing and neutralizing political dissidents. Sunstein is so anti-free speech that he called for making websites liable for comments posted in response to article. His books like On Rumors: How Falsehoods Spread, Why We Believe Them, What Can Be Done, was criticized by some as “a blueprint for online censorship.” So, the government shouldn't end site for just have comments that disagree with the government. Millions of people are waking and trolls sprewing propaganda won't stop the truth at all.
Some people want the people to break up giant banks if the government refuse to do so. Some want this to occur since the economy can't permantly recover and stabilize truly until the giant banks are broken up. The top independent experts agree that the too big to fails are a drain on the economy and put the entire system at risk. This is further evidence on why the giant banks aren't lending much money to the people who need it. Fortune proved in February that smaller bnaks are stepping in to fill the lending void left by the giant banks' current hestinancy to make loans. Indeed, the article points out that the only reason that smaller banks haven’t been able to expand and thrive is that the too-big-to-fails have decreased competition. Federal Reserve Governorsaid that smaller banks can provide services to help people in a financial crisis. There is a role in community banks. Tarullo said in June that: "...For example, while the number of credit unions has declined by 42 percent since 1989, credit union deposits have more than quadrupled, and credit unions have increased their share of national deposits from 4.7 percent to 8.5 percent. In addition, some credit unions have shifted from the traditional membership based on a common interest to membership that encompasses anyone who lives or works within one or more local banking markets..." Now, credit unions are providing services to small business increasing the extent to which they compete with community banks. The government banks permament bailouts toward banks instead of breaking up the giant banks who aren't lending to the people who need loans. There should be a seperation between business activities like depository banking fucntions and speculative investments. The government is allowing companies to get involved in a wider variety of business activities. Economist Simon Johnson for example exposes how Goldman Sachs recently converted to a financial holding company, allowing Goldman to borrow money from the Fed at essentially no cost, and then invest it in any thing it wants. Johnson gives an example: Goldman bought a large share of the stock of a Chinese automaker. If the investment succeeds, Goldman will reap the profits. If it fails, the American taxpayers are on the hook. So, Goldeman is profiting from its combination of roles as both an investment brokerage house for other investors and as a large speculative investor itself.
Women are showing signs declaring women that do regret abortion will flood the March for Life event. Hundreds of thousands of pro-life advocates will gather for the March for Life in Washington B.C. and the Walk for Life in San Francisco. Pro-Life signs will exist like "Women Do Regret Abortion." Thousands of these signs are being shipped to people. There is the story of 2 women holding up signs in California at an abortion center saying, "I Regret My Abortion" and a woman slated to have abortion turning around and deciding against an abortion after seeing the signs. The words were powerful. The woman pasued before entering the clinic. She crossed the street and came up to teh 2 women with the sign to talk with them. Later, the woman saved her baby that day. That is a good thing. The new signs are a variation of the personal abortion regret sign that Silent No More have sponosred. This has been seen nationwide. These signs expose the evil of abortion, which is what the mainstream news media and other so-called women's group don't want people to know about. These brave women showing the sign are apart of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign. They exist in pro-life rallies. People are going to see "Women Do Regret Abortion" signs. America is in a crossroad. Either we see the deaths of more millions of innocent babies. The other path is the peaceful, non-evil path of following life and the respect for the dignity of all human life whether they be born or unborn (inside the mother's womb).
The Army files charges against a Single mother. They want a special court martial for the female Spc. Alexis Hutchinson. She has a 1 year old boy. Hutchinson missed her deployment to Afghanistan late last year when her child care plans for her son named Kamani fell through at the last minute. Hutchinson and her attorney have been working with the Army in good faith to resolve her sitatuion adminsitration rather than through the criminal process. They still hoped that they would have been the most fair and compassionate way for the Army to deal with the difficult situation administration. They want that the most fair compassionate way for the Army to deal with the difficult situation. Maj. Daniel Gallagher is the rear detachment commander of the 3rd Infantry Division and is according to Hutchinson's civilian attorney Rai Sue Sussman: "...the one who signed the charges [against Hutchinson].” "I am disappointed in Major Daniel Gallagher's decision to go ahead with filing charges, which shows a lack of compassion for this young mother and her infant son, and a lack of discretion in dealing with the situation fairly," Sussman wrote in a press release issued on Thursday. "The situation tends to show that the Army is not able to effectively and humanely counsel Army families in this situation. An infant and his mother were forcibly separated, when other options were available to the commander. This was a failure of her chain of command to properly counsel her, given her situation. On top of all this, criminal charges seem unnecessary." Sussman said that the Army claims to have offers to counsel Hutchinson with other options. Yet, Hutchinson can't image that htey gave an offer beyond foster care, but they were unspecific in their press released about what that child care would be. The military's press release on that matter said that Hutchinson's command had informed her of other options to take care of her child, but that she had refused these options. Sussman said that she speaks with Hutchinson regularly and knows that the government care for her infant is not something that her client wants to do. In previous instances when soldiers deploy and leave a child in state custody, when the parent returns they often experience problems in exercising their parental rights, and in some cases have even lost custody of their child. Sussman told Truthout that she was taken aback by the Army's recent decision when she felt that negiotations were making progress. "First we offered and put in an application for a Chapter 5A discharge for parenthood, which is an honorable discharge," she said, "But more recently we were willing to take a misconduct discharge to get things over with. But her commander rejected that and filed criminal charges. Hutchinson would really just like to put this all behind her." Sussman wants equity and efficiency in this guilty. If Hutchinson is found guity during a special court-martial, then she could face 1 year detention in a military brig and forfeiture of a percentage of all of her pay while in jail. She won't get a honorable discharge from the military upon completion of her jail time. This can forfeit some or likely all of her benefits. Sussman told Truthout that Major Gallagher want to throw the book at her. Her child was even taken away from her being arrested in November. Hutchinson now is at Hunter Army Airfeild near Savannah, Georgia where she was posted since February 2008. In mid-November 2009, Hutchinson was jailed and threatened with a court-martial if she did not agree to deploy to Afghanistan. At the time, her son was placed into a county foster care system. Before this, Hutchinson was allowed to fly to California to leave her son with her mother named Angelique Hughes of Oakland (according to the family care plan of the U.S. Army). Hughes was unable to care for Kamani since her daughter had special needs, her mother was ailing, and has an ailing sister. In late October 2009, Angelique Hughes told Hutchinson and her commander, Captain Gassant, that she would be unable to care for Kamani after all. The Army then gave Hutchinson an extension of time in order to enable her to find someone else to care for Kamani. Meanwhile, Hughes brought Kamani back to Georgia to be with his mother. Days before Hutchinson's original deployment date, Hutchinson was told by the Army that she wouldn't get the time extension after all and would have to deploy (despite not having found anyone to care for her child). Faced with this choice, Specialist Hutchinson chose not to show up for her plane to Afghanistan. The military arrested her and placed her child in the county foster care system. Susanna said that Hutchinson wanted to find someone to take care of her child not trying to get out of her deployment. Hutchinson's mother flew to Georgia to took temporary custody of the baby, but she was unsuccessful. Sussman hopes that they are able to resolve the situation with a good solution for Hutchinson, "where she's not separated from her child and not given a criminal conviction. So I hope she can either beat the court martial or find a good resolution by working with the Army. But I'm pretty frustrated that they still want to punish her, even though she's been fully cooperative with them from the very beginning." Hutchinson wants proper arrangements with her son if she's in jail. Sussman said that the Army haven't given her compassion and discretion when her child is involved. This is a difficult choice, but in a situation like this, compassion toward the mother and the child ought to be given.
Secret Societies are real. theindustryexposed's Youtube account explained an interesting view about Lady gaga and her agenda recently. Lady Gaga of course had occult/Masonic symbolism in her videos, clothing, etc. Lady Gaga in a concert said that: "...Now I want you to remember that tonight you will not be a human being anymore. Tonight you became a monster..." A definition of a monster is in an evil connotation. It's usually grosteque looking and sadistic that seeks to harm the norms of society. It's sociopathic and without moral control. So, Lady Gaga calls her fans monsters. She also mentions that: "...Kings write the history of there people, It's the prolific nature that both creates and procures that will be later percieved as the Kingdom, so, The real truth aobut Lady Gaga fans, my little monsters, Lies in this sentence: They are the kings, They are the queens, They write the history of the kingdom. It is in the theory of perception that we have established our bond or the lie I should say, for which we kill. We are nothing without our image, without our projection, without the spiritual hologram of who we percieve ourselves to be rather to become in the future.. When your lonely, I'll be loney too and this is the fame. Love and heart, 12-18-1974, Lady Gaga..." This is a strange message to say the least. All of the numerals of 12181974 equals to 33 in its sum (33 is the highest degree in Scottish Rite Freemasonry). These words come from the interlude from Lady Gaga's monster ball. In that ball, Lady Gaga wear bondage masks and tribal clothing. What she means by Kings writing history is that the elite or monarch write the history of their people. It's not a secret that mainstream history (unlike true independent history) has been manipulated by the globalists (who are Rockefeller-funded) in other to protect themselves from exposure (and control socieites). The people she describes are us whom the elite consider cattle or the massages. Numerous History books lie. She talks about the kingdom ruled by the King, which is a representation of the new world order or the new age system in the world (since she calls this Kingdom as under development in her monologue). She wants to people know that they (or the Kings being the elite) are the Kings, Queen, and they write the history of the Kingdom. Lady Gaga further comments that: "...The... Kindgom of the devoted jester. A jester is a person who puts on a front as an entertainer amuse the Monarch and the masses. Could it be that Lady Gaga is acting as a jester to destract from the truth that occultism still influences the mainstream popular culture. Lady Gaga showed the hand near her eye and shows other secretive symbolism. She said that: "...It was a thousand years before that the monter first entered the city for our heats and for our brains...But it wasn't until the year 3009 that we realize we could all coexist with this monster...with our music..." The monster seems to represents the evil in human existence also. This is typical since Lady gaga promotes the robotic agenda (or the dehumanization of humans and the humanization of robots). She lies and that we are nothing without our projection or image or the spiritual hologram of who we think we are. This is New Age jargon since by conception, all human beings have value. We aren't nothing. It's ironic that she wore a mask in the skit since mainstream entertainers hid the mask of their false persona using fake names(makeup, clothing, cars, houses, acting a certain way, jewelry, etc.) in order to hide their true self (which is usually depressed and without a tortured soul). Some pictures of entertainers are edited to not show their true image.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment