Conclusive evidence is shown that the global distribution of Rockefeller funded anti-fertility vaccine that was coordinated by WHO. The Rockfeller Foundation's made efforts to promote vaccines for mass scale fertility reduction. Population control is promoted by the UN Population Fund, the World Bank, and the World Health Organization under the guise of a "Task Force on Vacciens for Fertility Regulation." For 4 years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched a massive funding operations into anti-feritility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the WHO, World Bank, and UN Population Fund. Its mission according to one of its members to support: "...“basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this international, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.” The Task Force wants to acts a coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D in the various working groups and support research on different approaches. Thsi include anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines. This is created to neutralize the biological functions of hCG. The Task Force has succeeded in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG vaccine. P.D. Griffin is one of the Task Force members. He promoted the Fertaility Regulating Vaccines as being in the following: "...The Task Force has continued to coordinate its research activities with other vaccine development programmes within WHO and with other international and national programmes engaged in the development of fertility regulating vaccines..." Griffin exposed the purposes of the vaccines in the implementation of it in developing countries by his words: "...If vaccines could be developed which could safely and effectively inhibit fertility, without producing unacceptable side effects, they would be an attractive addition to the present armamentarium of fertility regulating methods and would be likely to have a significant impact on family planning programmes..." So, they promote trying to create cheap anti-fertility vaccines. This is has been promtoed by the 1978 WHO's Task Force (then it was called the Task Force on Immunological Methods for Fertility Regulation). In 1976, the WHO Expanded Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction published a report that promoted regulation in fertility. The report wanted WHO research to make this plan work via health servies. The Anti-Fertility Vaccine was coined by the Rockfeller Foundation. was replaced by the more bureaucratic sounding “Fertility Regulating Vaccine (FRV), the programme was obviously the same. Besides, The time line shows conclusively that the WHO, UN Population Fund and World Bank continued on a path outlined by the Rockefellers in the late 1960s. So, it isn't a secret that the WHO even in the early 1970's want to have an anti-fertility vaccine. The 1992 document wanted engineered FRVs or Fertility Regulating Vaccines to promote a reduction of the human population. Since the early 1990's, scientists hae used vaccines to interfere with sperm function and fertilization. The Rockefeller Foundation did trilas of anti-fertility drugs in China, Brazil, and Austria.
John McCain is easily a political shill today. He's apart of the CFR or the Council on Foreign Relations. Now, John McCain introduced 2 bills in the Senate. They are Machiavellian. One is S.3081. It will authorizethe federal government to detain American citizens indefinitely without a trial. S.3002 is a bill that would authorize the federal government to regulate vitamins, minerals, and virutally all health plus natural food products. According to Examiner.com, “John McCain introduced a bill into the U.S. Senate which, if passed, would actually allow U.S. citizens to be arrested and detained indefinitely, all without Miranda rights or ever being charged with a crime.” The Examiner reports says that the bill isn't conservative at all. It would take away our right to trial. It would allow the federal government to arrest and imprison anyone the current administration deems "hostile." Recently, the DHS called veterans, retired law enforcment, Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin supporters, and conservatives as equivalent to terrorists. McCain has issues with promoting our Constitution. People have the right to a speedy trial by jury and the constitutional right to habeas corpus. No one of these rights should be invalidated under the names of national security and the war on terrorism. On February 3, 2010, John McCain introduced to the United States Senate the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010. This act compares supplements to radioactive enriched uranium. Vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and botanicals can help people. The Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 has supports from many liberals in Congress. It allows the FDA to have broad new powers that Europe has. It approved supplements that the government allows. There is nothing wrong with legitimate oversight, but not equating vitamins to poisions. McCain wants a tougher global warming treaty. He claims to be for economic populism, but he won't condemn derivatives. cCain told the Hoover Institute in May 1, 2007 that if he were President, he would created the international organization of the LD or the League of Democracies. In advancing the LD, McCain said, “We should go further and start bringing democratic peoples and nations from around the world into one common organization, a worldwide League of Democracies.” He then added, “The new League of Democracies would form the core of an international order . . .” The LD would be similar to the U.N. McCain is trying to play both sides of the immigration issue like Lindsey Graham. So, McCain is promoting policies that are against the constitutional freedoms and liberties that people respect and love.
There is a controversy over absteinence programs. President Obama and some in Congress want to cut funding for about 176 abstinence programs despite a new study. These programs are going into youth and young adults on September 30, because Congress and the Obama administration canceled all grants going to abstinence centered programming in their FY2010 budget. the new study shows the effectiveness of abstinence education progrsm and the support parents have for them. "We are greatly concerned that the sex education policy being implemented by this administration does not reflect the values of what most parents and teens clearly want," Valerie Huber, Executive Director of the National Abstinence Education Association told LifeNews.com today. Huber said that some programs will lose their midstream in their 5 year grant awarad. She said that almost 2 million student wouldn't recieves lessons in dealing with abstinence education. A recent HHS study said that most teens and their parents support the core message of the program. The study is called The National Survey of Adolescents and Their Parents, was posted Monday to the HHS website after significant grassroots pressure. It calls into question whether recent sex education policy decisions truly reflect cultural norms or clear evidence-based trends. According to the findings, about 70% of parents agreed that it is “against [their] values for [their] adolescents to have sexual intercourse before marriage” and that “having sexual intercourse is something only married people should do.” Adolescents gave similar responses. Larry McAdoo is the executive director of STARS, which is an abstience progrm in Mississippi. It could lose funding if the cuts occured. Larry said that cuts in funding is unnecessary since according to him Mississipi has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the nation. McAdoo want teenagers to make healthy chices in their lives. The ACF is a division of the HHS. It funded a survey of 1,000 adolescents of 12-18 years old in order to measure parent-adolescent communication and adolescent attitudes toward sex and abstinence. The study found that parents who strongly support the concept that sexual relatiosn are best saved for a martial relationship and parents' attitudes are more important (in influencing adolescent views than the level of parent communication with their adolescent). The American Public Health Association (APHA) highlighted the results on its web site: “Adjusting for all other factors in the model, parent and peer factors are more consistently associated with differences in adolescent attitudes about sex and abstinence than are measures of adolescent exposure to sex and abstinence topics in a class or program." However, during an APHA conference, researcher Lisa Rue, Ph.D., who specializes in adolescent behavior, was intrigued by the study and requested the full report. She was denied access and the Obama administration denied a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for it. The National Abstinence Education Association responded by encouraging interested persons to submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the public release of a study. Huber of the NAEA said that hundreds submitted the request for openness regarding the stuy. So, the HHS posted the entire study report on Monday. Huber concluded in her comments: "It is important that the representative government reflects the desires of its constituents. This study's findings call for a reinstatement of funding for abstinence education within the next fiscal budget." People desiring abstinence is fine in their personal lives, yet sexual education being comprehensively shown is fine as well.
The President is cornered by many forces. The corporate forces have attacked people for thousands of years. Now, they want the whole privitization of te public sector. Even with some attacks against President Barack Obama by some bankers, there has been billions of dollars sent from the government into Wall Street coffers. Still, Wall Street is even more demanding with their agenda. It is certainly immoral to place profit above the legitimate concerns of the people. Some of the Democrats have been pacified of fear of offending FOX News and their ilk. The Republican Party have been hijacked by Austrian economic extremists as well. The Tea party cry out their demands as well. Many Tea party people ignore the corporate relationship to the recession in 2007. Even President Barack Obama's concessions to the establishment in health care, the war on terror, etc. isn't enough for the elite. Wall Street really wants to hord the wealth in order to promote free market extremism. They certainly don't desire a radical infrastructure build up or banning derivatives. The drive for austeriy is a rallying cry of the elite. They want to devour any public resource in their way in trying to act like budget hawks (when military expenditures are in records highs for America). Corporate hijacking of education and cuts in Social Security are threats today.
Secret Societies still exist worldwide. "Father" Francisco Calvo was a Freemason in Costa Rica. He promoted it there. Some of the priests he worked with were also Freemasons. On his return to Costa Rica, together with other Masons already residents, he established Lodge Caridad No. 26, which was granted a Charter on June 28,1865, by the Grand Orient of New Granada. The Supreme Council of Central America was located in San Jose, Costa Rica. It was created in January 9, 1871 under a Charter granted by the Supreme Council of New Granada to Ill. Bro.
By Timothy Dr. Francisco Calvo,33", dated November 27,1870, which empowered him to created the Grand Orient and the Supreme Council of Central America, in the city of San Jose.
This Supreme Council was allowed to be taken temporally to the City of Guatemala, under the condition that it be returned seven years later. Freemasonry have a long history in Mexico. The first two political parties in Mexico were Masonic, "the yorkinos" (York Rite) and the "escoceses" (Scottish Rite). Catholic priests and the first U.S. ambassador, Joel Poinsett, helped to introduce Masonry to Mexico.