It is a historical fact that the FBI fosters and equipped American terrorists. We know about the Boston Marathon bombing that provoked shock, grief, and outrage from around the globe. Much of the propaganda campaign has worked among some to believe that terrorism is automatically equated with Muslim radicals exclusively. Yet, we see that many terror plots on American soil in the last 10 years have been fostered, funded, and equipped by the FBI. Human beings from around the world have expressed legitimate outrage at the evil Boston Marathon bombings. That act was cowardly and completely evil. This event has been exploited by some to justify further actions (from violations to our civil liberties to more war mongering in the world) in the contrived war on terror. Now, some want to blame Muslims for this event when the reality is that extremists are responsible for these actions. The New York Post falsely implied that a Saudi national (being questioned about his possible role in the attack). The next day, a plane departing Boston Logan Airport, returned to the gate and two passengers were forcibly removed because they had been overheard speaking Arabic before takeoff. We must reject a knee jerk tendency to blame Muslims for every act of terrorism in the world. Bombs targeting innocents in America are not necessarily link inextricably with bearded, turban wearing human beings. In 2005, federal prosecutors charged the 47 year old drifter Michael Reynolds with attempting to wage jihad on the U.S. by blowing up fuel facilities. He lived with his elderly moth. The reality was that his plan for jihad was nothing more than a group of conversations he had on a Yahoo! Chat room with an U.S. judge posing as a militant. He was arrested after agreeing to meet with an FBI informant who had promised him $40,000 for his cause. Two months later, the FBI quietly announced that he was likely mentally ill. He was convicted and is currently serving 25 years in jail. We know about the Fort Dix Six back in 2007. It dealt with a much hyped FBI terror bust. The men were said to want to attack an U.S. military base and kill the soldiers there. In that time, a 26 page indictment revealed that the group had “no rigorous military training” and “did not appear close to being able to pull off an attack.” The next year it was revealed that the FBI informant, who had infiltrated the group, had in fact offered to organize the members and lead the plot itself. In 2009, we have the Newburgh Four. They were arrested for an alleged plot to blow up synagogues and shoot down military airplanes in Newburgh, New York. The group was stereotyped as poor black men. One of them was mentally unstable. Shahad Hussein turned out to be an FBI informant who had promised the members hundreds of thousands of dollars to carry out the plot. During the sentencing the defendants, Federal Judge Colleen McMahon said that: “[The government] created acts of terrorism out of [the defendant's] fantasies of bravado and bigotry, and then made those fantasies come true. The government did not have to infiltrate and foil some nefarious plot – there was no nefarious plot to foil.” There was the FBI in November of 2010 busting the so-called Christmas Tree Bomber. He was allegedly trying to bomb the lighting ceremony at Portland's Pioneer Courthouse Square. The FBI said that the threat was real. The alleged bomber or Arthur Balizan was a teenager. He bragged to undercover agents that he could get a gun since he was a rapper (and wrote an article on workout tips for jihadists). In 2011, the FBI arrested a man that they themselves had supplied with a remote controlled plane and C4 explosives in a harebrained attempt to bomb the Pentagon. In 2012 they busted another would-be jihadi that they again had supplied with a fake gun and suicide vest. The FBI in 2012 busted a group of five anarchists. They were accused of trying to bomb a bridge in the Cleveland area. It was quietly admitted that the FBI informant infiltrated the group. This informant had initiated contact with them and was present at the meetings where they developed the plan to blow up the bridge. So, many FBI informants work with the plotters until it is time for an arrest. Many FBI insiders and whistleblowers have exposed this history. We have the right to question the war on terror paradigm in the world. Many terror plots in the past have been exaggerated or otherwise. The FBI even has been complicit in many terror campaigns from COINTELPRO to other events.
Globalism has been an old goal spanning a very long time. Some want a world currency by 2018 called the Phoenix. The Fabian socialist H.G. Wells wrote in his 1939 book called The New World Order that mentioned a planned world government, which will come as a world state from a conference in Basra, Iraq. As early as the late 1800's, Skulls and Bones member William Whitney wanted the nation to alternate political power between the Democrats and the Republicans. Many Theosophists like Alice Bailey said that by 2025, there will be the end of the momentary cycle. So, Bailey believed that her Maitreya figure won't come to Earth until after 2025. Alice Bailey said in 1933 that according to “The Plan,” the World Federation of Nations would be “taking rapid shape” by 2025. So, the elite have their timelines. They always ally with the occult, because some of them actually believe in it as a means to gain power and psychological influence over the masses of the people. The good news is masses of the people are smart enough to realize that economic inequality and other injustices are abhorrent. One of the easy goals to see of the establishment is to bash the concept of the individual. There is value in the group and the individual. Individual initative and individual power can change the world along with collective power. Now, in this age, the Obama administration has tried to eliminate even journalists to make favorable words about the White House. According to a report published by the New York Times in July 2012, media outlets are often not allowed to print quotes from members of the Obama team until the administration has had an opportunity to edit them. This is a fact. "I can tell you categorically that there's always been, right from the get-go of the administration, an overzealous sensitivity to any push-back from any media outlet," said David Brody, a political correspondent for CBN News. Neil Munro, a White House correspondent for the Daily Caller shared a similar sentiment. "The reporters I've spoken to who have covered multiple administrations have said this is tighter, more restricted than other administrations. They don't like it. They don't have the power to change it," Munro declared. We know how the CFR and other interests influence the mainstream media and their reporting. The CIA with Operation Mockingbird and their other agents influence the mainstream media all of the time. Culturally, we should be better. We know that seditions, heresies, drunkenness, reveling, adultery, etc. don't work. These things don't lead into a more moral world. They lead into more destruction, evils, and other problems. We don't need an oppressive theocracy, but we can advance a culture where more ethics are common place.
Now, we know that there is value in diversity. Diversity can be greatly beneficial to society where there is equity. When you have true equity of opportunity and access for all, diversity is fine in any society. When you have systems of inequality, discrimination, and oppression, then you will have conflicts. When you have the total, complete freedom of association, then human beings can live good, normal, healthy choices. Yet, in order for a real society to come, we have to address racism, inequality, and discrimination. There is still housing discrimination in America. Changing laws are important too. When you change laws and change institutions to make society more egalitarian, then even some reactionary human beings can change to be more receptive toward authentic justice. Giving all human beings educational opportunities, nutrition, and real economic power can benefit all of the people. Even Tim Wise is right to point out the following information: "...They are facial structure, skin color, and hair texture. Those are things that are controlled by six genes out of thirty thousand genes in the human genome and those genes have never been shown by any geneticist on the planet, any biologist on the planet, to be connected, or what geneticists call “concordant,” with any other trait known as intelligence or known as temperament or behavior or ethics or morality or any of those kinds of things. So even though individuals absolutely have certain genetic predispositions towards everything from certain diseases to the ability to sing, to play music, to jump high, to run fast, there’s no reason to believe that those things would cluster on the basis of this thing that we now call race...." That is why we need to continue to advance freedom and not only that. We should advance a radical, revolutionary change of the current system in this world. There huge disparities in income, wealth, education, etc. ought to be eliminated. People of color especially in America have been oppressed and we deserve that justice. Also, racism is not just overt hatred or Jim Crow acts of terror. Racism can be subtle in unfair biases and stereotypical thinking about certain people groups. Racists now ascribe to the lie that cultural flaws exist collectively in minority communities, therefore it is used to justify some in believing in the lie of the inferiority of minorities. Progress in America has slowed, because since the 1970's, we have a decline in heavy industry, we have a real dollar decline, and we have the glamorization of reactionary policies in America. Therefore, the poor now have a harder time coming into the middle class even. Benefits are eroding and jobs are hard to come by. Even for the modern criminal justice system to ban ex-offenders from voting for life even after they have paid their debt to society is unjust. The Sister Michelle Alexander is right to point that out in her book entitled, "The New Jim Crow." Welfare is the new scapegoat that reactionaries use as a means to justify neo-liberal propaganda. The reality is that most black Americans never received benefits from most of these programs. Even at their height, programs like AFDC/TANF never reached more than perhaps 8 percent of black Americans at any given time (now it’s about 4 percent). Only about 18 percent of black Americans receive food stamps. So, to assume that such programs will cause some cultural dysfunction is fantasy. Also, various Scandinavian nations have higher rates of social spending as a share of their GDP of all income earned. Yet, this massive welfare system for Scandinavia has not caused a massive economic tragedy there at all. The reality is that nutrition for the elderly, rural housing insurance, adoption assistance, Pell Grants for college, disability payments for disabled children, green technology, etc. are not sins at all. They are blessings. Many of the Great Society programs were beginning to work until budgets were cut and the economy shift from manufacturing to a more service economic system (in the 1970's).
White supremacy has used restrictions of weapons for centuries. White supremacy has used drones and Africom and we know who supports that agenda. They or the establishment wants the monopoly of arms in guns, bombs, nuclear weapons, drones, etc. It is hypocritical for those to lecture on gun control and then support the policy of aiding terrorists in Syria or aiding terrorists in Libya killing black men, women, and children. Living in some suburb with armed bodyguards and denying others a God given right is not consistent at all. It is neither a sin nor evil to possess a gun as a long as someone doesn't use that gun for an evil purpose. That is the point. The white supremacist Hitler wanted a monopoly of arms and restricted Jewish folks from defending themselves. They restricted the arms of black human beings in America during the Maafa and during the time in Reconstruction via oppressive laws. The issue is that the state has no right to have a monopoly of arms. Having a monopoly of arms dictated by the system of white supremacy is the issue. Stop and frisk, mass incarceration, the war on Drugs, and other evils have to do with corrupt actions that violate human universal liberties. These realities have nothing to do with innocent human beings having the right to defend themselves or any black human being having the right to be armed. It was the Deacons of Defense that utilized arms to protect innocent law abiding civil rights activists that just wanted to exercise their God given rights. It was the Black Panthers that used arms to defend themselves against crooked police officers. It was the black revolutionaries from Nkrumah to Lumumba that used arms to fight against white supremacists and imperialists. Malcolm X advocated the ownership of arms. So, the use of arms for good is righteous. The usage of arms for evil is morally wrong. The Colorado movie theater, the mall shootings, etc. were done by criminals who many of them possessed mental illness or deranged situations. These folks are not representative of real, rational people. No real black freedom lover is using coded language. If some bigoted whites are using it, and then they are wrong since the fundamental point is that any human being has the right to self-defense (and we can advance your gun safety moves). You can solve the murder epidemic in Chicago by addressing socioeconomic issues and creating a radical Marshall like plan to help folks in Chicago (and throughout the nation. Trayvon Martin died at the hand of a brute and that SYG law should be banned of course since it advances vigilantism). Law abiding citizens include the vast majority of black human beings living in the ghetto, middle class, rich, or rural areas worldwide. People like us oppose police brutality, racial profiling, and other evils. I don't believe in scapegoating all gun owners for crimes by evil human beings. Real folks will never blame the victims of white supremacy of their own oppression, but white supremacy has used radical anti-gun measures all throughout history. No one is advocating anybody to own a gun like crooked police or deranged criminals. Innocent human beings have the right to their freedom. People from across the political spectrum and even socialists are not advocating the state to have a monopoly of arms.
The privatization of water is still a threat in the world. The current Chairman and former CEO of Nestlé, who is the largest producer of food products in the world, wants something. He wants privatization as a means to solve global water issues. The statement is clear from the company that has peddled junk food in the Amazon. It has invested money to thwart the labeling of GMO-filled products and has a disturbing health and ethics record for its infant formula. Nestle has shown a cyber-army to monitor Internet criticism. Nestle is a company with a history of creating shortages according to some sources. According to Jeffrey Green from the Activist Post: "...Large multinational beverage companies are usually given water-well privileges (and even tax breaks) over citizens because they create jobs, which are apparently more important to the local governments than water rights to other taxpaying citizens…” These companies such as Coca Cola and Nestlé (which bottles suburban Michigan well-water and calls it Poland Spring) suck up millions of gallons of water, leaving the public to suffer with any shortages...." Chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe denies that access to water is a public right. Having access to water is a human right. If privatization is the answer, then we should we trust big multinational corporations sending water to folks? The answer is No. Dilwan said that Nestle is responsible for sending children filthy water in the small Pakistani community of Bhati Dilwan. Dilwan is a former village councilor. Dilwan said that the water was not only dirty, but the water level sank from 100 to 300 to 400 feet. If the community experienced fresh water being piped in, it would eliminate Nestle of its lucrative market in water bottled under the Pure Life brand. Brabeck outlined his views on water and Nature years ago. He said that Nature is pitiless and that organic food is bad including that GM is great view. To Brabeck, you are an extremist if you disagree with him or love organic foods. His views are important to know since it outlines the mentality of many of these anti-health freedom activists. We do not need Nature to be starved of resources at all. Brabeck acts like his Nestle Group is ensuring the health of the global population. What would improve the health of the global population deals with true environmental care. Globalization have allow transnational corporations to and trade organizations to have a lust to own as much of the Earth's resources as possible. International financial groups want the same goal as well. Water resources are important for all of human life because of obvious reasons. Pollution has damaged fresh water resources of the world. Even the Green Revolution was not perfect and caused more sucking of scare groundwater. Suez Lyonnaise grew its reach in water supplies. The German based RWE Aktiengesellschaft purchased the British OMI-Thames (including the largest private water company in America called the United States American Water Works). Many multinational water corporations even lobbied the World Water Forum meeting back in 2001 to change the definition of water from being a human right to a human need. So, we do not need privatization. We need the right of the people to have clean water instead. Water is never some commodity that ought to be only sold for private gain. It is a right of the people.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment