Must Read info

Memoirs Of Jacobinism (Conspiracy Nation, 06/23/07) –

Memoirs Of Jacobinism, by Abbé Barruel, ranks with Proofs Of A Conspiracy, by John Robison, as a classic of conspiracy theory. Barruel's book, unfortunately, is almost impossible to get. Nesta Webster, in her book on the “glorious” French Revolution, relies a great deal upon Barruel.But controversial author Helena P. Blavatsky adds a new twist to the French Revolution and Barruel when she claims Barruel missed seeing the deeper, Jesuit conspiracy involved. In Isis Unveiled (Vol. II, ch. viii), Blavatsky writes, in part, “The Memoirs of Jacobinism by this Abbé, an eye-witness to the horrors of the first [French] Revolution, is devoted in great measure to the Rosicrucians and other Masonic fraternities. The fact alone that he traces the modern Masons to the [Knights] Templars, and points them out as secret assassins, trained to political murder, shows how little he knew of them, but how ardently he desired, at the same time, to find in these societies convenient scape-goats for the crimes and sins of another secret society which, since its existence, has harbored more than one dangerous political assassin – the Society of Jesus [Jesuits].”The Society of Jesus, derisively known as the Jesuits, a secret society? Such is the case, at least according to Blavatsky. She cites several sources to back her claim. “This noble fraternity,” she writes, “which many preachers have of late so vehemently denied to have ever been a secret one, has been sufficiently proved as such.

Their constitutions were translated into Latin by the Jesuit Polancus, and printed in the college of the Society at Rome, in 1558. 'They were jealously kept secret, the greater part of the Jesuits themselves knowing only extracts from them. They were never produced to the light until 1761, when they were published by order of the French Parliament in 1761, 1762, in the famous process of Father Lavalette.' The degrees of the Order are: I. Novices; II. Lay Brothers, or temporal Coadjutors; III. Scholastics; IV. Spiritual Coadjutors; V. Professed of Three Vows; VI. Professed of Five Vows. 'There is also a secret class, known only to the General and a few faithful Jesuits, which, perhaps more than any other, contributed to the dreaded and mysterious power of the Order,' says Niccolini [in “History of the Jesuits”].”Note especially the last claim, that there is a secret degree of initiation in the Society of Jesus. This is relevant in the case of the late Father Malachi Martin, supposed to have left the Order. Martin's book, The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church, is excellent. But was Father Martin truly a “former” Jesuit? That question is merely asked, as a caveat before delving into his claim that the Jesuits underwent a momentous change, erupting in the 1960s.One of the crucial figures in Martin's analysis is Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. He invented an unorthodox theology featuring Christ as the “Omega Point.” A “new humanity” is in the process of emerging. A Teilhardian biological evolution is enlaced with religion. Humanity is only now at a “middle point.” At the Omega Point, “man” will be more than man: Ultra-Human. “Evolution” in the Teilhardian sense “implied evolution also in the distribution of goods, an equalization of property that capitalism made impossible.” (Martin, op. cit.) Superficially, these ideas got Teilhard de Chardin into trouble. They were interpreted by some as a heresy of “Humanity as Christ,” i.e. “The Church is the People.” But Teilhard de Chardin was nonetheless somehow allowed to operate, on the fringe.In Nicaragua, in the 1970s and 1980s, Jesuits found common cause with Marxists. “The people are the church,” was their belief. Jesuits began implementing “Base Communities.” (See “Jesuit Base Communities Invade USA?” http://www.shout.net/~bigred/BaseCommunities.html)

The immigration bill had died in the Senate. Then George W. Bush visited, in Rome, Pope Benedict XVI. “Dubya” Bush immediately thereafter hurried back to America carrying the imperative, “The immigration bill must be passed.” One of the bill's co-sponsors is Senator Ted Kennedy, a Catholic with likely leanings toward the Jesuit point of view. (This is not “Anti-Catholic.” The Vatican, like Israel, is a sovereign state. Rome, wading in the mire of politics, cannot at convenience hike up its cassock and protest, “We are just a religion.”) As for George W. Bush, he has recently purchased a huge parcel of land in Paraguay, said by some to be a “Jesuit State.” (“For years their enemies had said the Jesuits were endeavouring to set up in the missions a State [Paraguay] quite independent of the Spanish crown. By their own conduct the Jesuits to some extent had given colour to the report, for by excluding (in the interest of the Indians) all Spaniards from the mission territories, it looked as if they were at work at something which they wished to keep a secret...” http://www.fullbooks.com/A-Vanished-Arcadi...t-of-the5.html)

What is called the Ultra-Montane versus Cis-Montane split in Catholicism, traditional hierarchical Catholicism versus Jesuit “Humanity is Christ,” sheds a whole new light upon political polarization in the United States. “The nation is polarized,” is the frequent op-ed centerpiece. To which faction, Ultra-Montane or Cis-Montane, does “She who would be president” belong? Speaking to the “Take Back America” conference, Hillary Clinton complained in favor of “the people” regarding stem cell laws. (Acknowledgement to George Will for coining the term, “She who would be president.”) It is commendable to be “for the people,” unless it truly means “for the Jesuits.”

Conspiracy Nation

_________________________

Jesuit Base Communities Invade USA?

(Conspiracy Nation, 06/16/07) -- “

Ah, yes. We must welcome the stranger (especially if he is Catholic),” say some of the Roman persuasion. This is what some Catholic princes are propagating, responding to controversy over illegal immigration in the United States.At least indirectly involved in the Catholic invasion are a branch of the Vatican sovereign state called the Society of Jesus, or Jesuits. In Nicaragua, in the 1970s and 1980s, Jesuits found common cause with Marxists. “The people are the church,” was their belief. Jesuits began implementing “Base Communities.” For the Catholic church, the base communities were originally conceived as a way to extend the ministry of a professional clergy spread too thin. Rather than a worshiping community focused solely on Sunday Masses, the communities became a place where faith was made personal.

(http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2004d/111204/111204m.php)

During the latter part of the 20th century and into the beginning of the next, Latin America has served as a kind of laboratory in extremis for contemporary religious ideas and models of church life. Base communities, liberation theology, new lay movements and traditional Catholicism, all mix in cultures often beset by desperate poverty, unstable and bloody politics, and powerful outside influences. (Ibid.)To be fair, the Jesuits have had some remarkable people in their ranks. These have been some tough hombres who have risked their lives and frequently been martyred for their beliefs. A different perspective on the Jesuits, however, was offered by the late Malachi Martin, in his bestselling book, The Jesuits: The Society Of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Jesuits were born in 1540 as a very special “fighting unit.” The Jesuits “were conceived in a military mode.” The Order has had its ups and downs. Recently, according to Martin, himself once a Vatican insider, the Jesuits have been in subtle rebellion against papal authority. (But in the murky world of Vatican politics, who knows what is really going on?) By the 1970s, Nicaragua had developed into “a public and dramatic test case between Pope and Jesuits.”“[T]he Marxist baby was at last wrapped in the very swaddling clothes of ancient Catholic terminology. Words and phrases laden with meaning for the people were co-opted and turned upside down.” (Martin, op. cit.) Jesuit priests actually served as high-ranking officials in Daniel Ortega's Communistic government. A new concept of the Catholic Church had been born. The faith of believers would create communities. “Base Communities, they are called in Nicaragua and elsewhere in Latin America – communidades de base.” There are (or were, circa 1987) nearly 1000 Base Communities in Nicaragua alone, and nearly 300,000 overall in Latin America. This idea of Base Communities, also called “Gatherings,” has spread to the United States. (Martin, op. cit.)Last year, when hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants “emerged from the shadows” for mass demonstrations here in the U.S., their organization was exceptional. The “spontaneous uprising” was extraordinarily well-planned.

This editor especially marveled at how, in the small cosmopolitan city where is located the headquarters of Conspiracy Nation, Latino marchers were leaded by young women with bullhorns. Since the Hispanic culture is noted for its cult of machismo, how was it the marchers were under the leadership of young women? This was an obvious anomaly.Who has the power to cause U.S. politicians to jump, contrary to the expressed opinion of a majority of Americans, outraged at secretive “immigration reform” legislation? F. Tupper Saussy would say the hidden force here would have to be the Jesuits. A popular anecdote from the Revolutionary War notes the timely appearance of a man called "the professor." This mysterious person appears at an opportune moment as elder statesman and diplomatist, crucially soothing disagreements amongst colonial leaders. That man, "the professor," was none other than Lorenzo Ricci, Superior General of the Jesuits, as shown by Saussy in his book, Rulers Of Evil. Ricci, not George Washington, is the true "Father of the country." (http://www.shout.net/~bigred/Rulers.htm)

The Base Communities seem to have headed north, since their success in Nicaragua. There is some merit in their contention of exploited labor. This does not mean, though, that Marxist analysis equals Marxist validity. It is a tricky situation: The Church being with the people can develop into the Church being extinguished by Karl Marx. Politics makes strange bedfellows, but beware that Comrade sleeping beside you. When Pope John Paul II visited Nicaragua in 1983, the Sandinistas would not allow a crucifix to be displayed on the altar. When Pope John Paul II attempted to preach moderation there, he was shouted down by a cacophonous cadre of commie caterwauling. It is okay for the Communists to make noise, but here in the U.S. there are rumblings against “hate speech,” which is apparently certain speech which Marxists don't like to hear. Reportedly, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat, who is a co-author of the immigration bill, said talk show hosts were partly responsible for derailing it. In her many years in the Senate, Feinstein complained, “I’ve never received more hate or more racist phone calls and threats.” (http://autone.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/senator-dianne-feinstein-disses-free-speech/)Amazingly, Trent Lott, a Republican, seems to favor shutting up average Americans rather than risk offending Marxist (and Jesuit?) sensibilities. “Talk radio is running the country. We're going to have to deal with that problem,” Lott reportedly stated.What is truly behind the push for this “immigration reform” legislation? Opinions vary. Some say it is part of a New World Order plot. Others say heartless corporations are to blame. “Cunctando regitur mundus,” say the Jesuits. (“If you can outwait all, you can rule all.”) A 1962 Moscow-Vatican Pact forbids the Church hierarchy from directly condeming Soviet Communism or Marxism. (Martin, op. cit.) Into this vacuum arose an alliance between Marxists and Jesuits. Has that alliance, via Base Communities, entered the United States? Is this why we must “welcome the stranger”??

Conspiracy Nation


_____________

Although Jesuit Superior General Lorenzo Ricci was not the father of the US Constitution, this article is full of good info.Brother Eric

__________

Thanks for your reply back Eric,

Yes, that is one of the things I have struggled with…is it the Zionists or the Jesuits behind everything?

I think, for many generations, even centuries, the Jesuits, unquestionably were a very influential force, according
to the 2 Bills Hughes books…which I’ve read by the way, and are VERY convincing.
Speaking on America, there is no question whatsoever that the Zionists (pro-Israel) are pulling the strings in Washington.

The Jesuit Order is the creator of Zionism, first advocated by Masonic Roman Catholic Napoleon Bonaparte I---the Order's Great Avenger. Its hand in the Dreyfus Affair (from which arose the modern Labor Zionist movement under Herzl) further proves the point. The call for the creation of a "Jewish State" lies in the secret quest in re-establishing the "Kingdom of Jerusalem" of the Pope's Dark Ages and Holy Roman Empire. Israel to Rome is "The Kingdom of Jerusalem;" the Vatican created it and must defend it "by any means necessary." Rome hates the racial Jews in the land but covets Jerusalem for the rebuilding of the Hebrew Temple. 60% of the property in Jerusalem is owned by Rome including the Temple Mount.

Now, if there are those who want to say who’s pulling the Zionists strings….well, that’s a possibility too.

To me, it just makes more sense that the power is coming from the Zionist Neo-cons…based on what I’ve come up with in the last 2 months or so.

Please read VAIII somehow. It will save you years of research as well as being a victim of "the patriot movement."

It’s just interesting how NONE of these 9-11 tell-all videos (loosechange etc) never point a finger at Zionism either…

The Masonic Labor Zionist connection is obvious as presented by several show hosts and authors. But none of them go to the creator of Labor Zionism and show that the Jesuits via their Masonic British Labor Party created the Labor Zionists. They are merely the Pope's court Jews as Rothschild is merely the "keeper of the Vatican treasury."

I don’t know, all I can say is that I’ve seen sooooo much info that points to Israel/Zionism as the cause, but again,

none of this is showing up in our media sources….obviously being kept under wraps (granted Jesuits aren’t either)

If you have strong evidence to what you’re saying here, please do point me in the direction of it, I’d like to see it.

Order a copy of VAIII. I will be happy to take your order!

BTW – You ARE aware of what Benjamin Franklin spoke about the Jews right? Hmmm, I wonder why that’s been editied out of all text books.

Franklin was a Masonic Jacobin Jesuit Coadjutor along with Jefferson. The true fathers of our country which the Lord used to give us religious liberty and political freedom was the non-practicing, anti-Illuminati Freemason George Washington and non-Mason James Madison advised by George Mason---all of whom were Baptist Calvinists.

Best,
Steve

Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric


Dear Steve,

It appears to me that author and lecturer Ryan Dawson is just another Michael Collins Piper. The fascist mantra "All roads lead to Israel" coupled with a deliberate avoidance of the Vatican and Jesuit Order bespeaks more than a mere lack of information.

The Jesuits caused this war via their Archbishop of New York, Edward Cardinal Egan. Egan and his Knights of Malta, controlling the US intelligence agencies (which include the CIA controlling the Mossad), caused 911. Rome now has her war for the benefit of her "Kingdom of Jerusalem" and will continue to control the Bush White House through Jesuit Georgetown University and Jesuit Fordham University via the CFR.

It is just this simple. The truth is in the details-- Mr. Dawson obviously avoids because he is an unconscious (or conscious) servant of Rome.

Sincerely in Faith,

Brother Eric

_________

From: Vyzygoth IV
To: Eric Jon Phelps
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:24 AM
Subject: Dr. John Coleman

brother eric:

i interviewed dr. john coleman yesterday. "conspirators' hierarchy" is coming out in a 4th edition. coleman felt he owed me from years gone by and i was happy to do the interview.

Dr. Coleman is a fine author with impeccable credentials. He was British Intelligence as you know. But I have suspected him from the beginning as being untrue after I finished his book mentioned above. The reason for this is his defence for the original Knights Hospitallers (especially its founder, Gerard), the present day, Rome-based Roman Catholic Knights of Malta (p. 204).

coleman, though he didn't speak to the jesuits,

Of course not, as he is also a Roman Catholic pro-Papacy and quite possibly a member of the Roman Catholic Order of the SMOM.

did say something interesting: that stalin hated the secret societies,

That was Stalin's "open but false policy." His "secret but true policy" was that he was a Mason. The same holds true for Hitler and Himmler. Both openly hated Masonry; secretly Hitler was a member of a very evil and sinister lodge---the "99 lodge" according to Jan van Helsing's Secret Societies and Their Power in the 20th Century.

Without question both Hitler and Stalin were Freemasons and thus worked together for the entire duration of the war/papal crusade. From Stalin's refusal to mobilize against the planned German invasion of the USSR in June of 1941 to Hitler's deliberate sacrifice of his 6th Army at Stalingrad, both dictators worked together. The Katyn Massacre was carried out by the Gestapo and NKVD working in unison---both police agencies being manned by Jesuits. There are many examples of this described in VAIII.

and when germany was set loose upon russia, stalin went to the orthodox church for help.

Stalin had deliberately murdered his finest officers and generals in preparation for the invasion. He beheaded his military leaving his Red Army, built by the exiled, racially Jewish Trotsky, without seasoned leaders. Stalin also betrayed the great Russian General Andre Vlasov, cutting off arms and food thus forcing him to surrender to the Nazis---and Hitler betrayed Vlasov by refusing to put Vlasov's anti-Soviet Russian army of 700,000 men (in German uniforms led by Vlasov himself) until the war was about lost. Stalin only went to the Orthodox Church and restored the Patriarch (one of Stalin's friends who had "survived" the Purges) so that the Russian Orthodox people would fight for Stalin against Hitler. This was a brilliant move by the Jesuits as the Russian people hated Stalin and hoped for a German victory over the Red Army---which SS/NKVD Jesuit Coadjutor Martin Bormann prevented.

your research places stalin getting an orthodox education, which was run by whom? the soj, right?

Yes. Stalin was educated as a boy in Gori at a Roman Catholic school manned by Caupuchins---secret Jesuits, as the Order had been banned by Alexander I in 1820. The "Caupuchins" then gave young Stalin a scholarship to attend the Orthodox Seminary in Tiflis, Georgia, where he was tutored by Jesuits in the garb of "Orthodox priests" for five years. I cover this in VAIII in great detail for the Russian people.

did not the soj infiltrate the orthodox church earlier in the 20th C?

Yes. The Jesuits penetrated the Orthodox Church in the 1770s after the whore, Empress Catherine II "the Great," allowed them to enter Russia after the pope killed the Order via his Bull of Suppression and Extinction issued in 1773. Therefore, the Order had infested the Orthodox Church (in accordance with their bloody Oath) for over 100 years before Stalin was trained by the Company ruling Tiflis Seminary.

could Stalin--in his mind--have legitimately seen anglo-european designs on russia and wished to repel them, therefore, going to the society for aid?

No. Stalin knew the score. He knew that the Jesuit Order ruled Hitler, FDR, Churchill, Mussolini and Franco---all of whom were Masons. His "auto plants" had been built by 33rd Degree Freemason Henry Ford, the same Henry Ford who had built factories for Hitler. His entire Soviet military host was supplied by Bonesman and SMOM Averill Harriman via Lend Lease---at the direction of 33rd Degree FDR.

coleman said stalin was a staunch anti-bolshevik, wishing pure communism for russia,

That is partially true if the term "Bolshevik" means "Jew." Stalin hated the Jews as did Hitler for which reason both dictators were used by the Order to massacre the Jews living on "The Pale of Settlement," first established by Tzar Nicholas I in the 1840s for the intended future massacre of Eurasian Jews. Later, in the 1930s during the Purges, Stalin killed all the Bolshevik Jews except one token Jew, Lazar Kaganovitch. The death lists (1936-38) were written by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Alexander Poskrebyshev, Stalin's "Martin Bormann" who lived with "Koba" in the Kremlin and was the real master of the USSR. Stalin never wanted pure communism for Russia as proven by one of the leaders of the American Communist Party quoted in VAIII.

but could stalin have been played by the society, then executed when his usefulness had expired?

Stalin was most definately used by the Order with his full knowledge. But he revolted against the Order by arresting two of his Jesuit masters. Lubyanka General Alexander Poskrebyshev---who oversaw the hanging of Vlasov in the Lubyanka---and NKVD General Nicolai Vlasik. Shortly thereafter, Stalin was poisoned, also covered in VAIII.

As did British SMOM Avro Manhattan, so Colman promotes the Cold War Hoax. Both were/are aware that the West and the East were financed and built by the same men, which Antony Sutton proves in his book on the Skull and Bones. We know those men to be SMOMs and high-level, select Freemasons---ruled by the Jesuits controlling the Papacy "for the greater glory of God."


thanks,

vyz

Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric

_________

JagDrs: I found a reference to a Gerard, on page 132 (PDF) of my e-copy of CH:SOC300. It is a brief reference, wherein Coleman does refer to Gerard as "a true Christian warrior". This said, I don't know enough of the background to understand how it is that Eric construes this as a damning faux pas on Colemans part. Then again, perhaps Eric read one of the more recent printings of this book that I have not, perhaps a printing that contains more information? Below is a cut & paste, I include a few pages before and after just to provide a broader context.

Craig: I notice no one speaks of the PILGRIM SOCIETY (Red Brotherhood)! My friends you need to be aware that the Sovereign Military Order of Malta control the Order of the Garter which is simply a most powerful inner circle of the SMOM. The Pilgrim Society is higher than the Garter within this organisation. The Jesuits are NOT controlled by the Queen. Why does the Queen have to curtsie if she visits Stonyhurst "Jesuit Military Fortress" College? Why is the Queen subordinate to the Pope? Why do we openly see her servility when we know what to look for? The British Royal family are powerful but no where near the Jesuits and co. You can see this within the video by assassinated Jim Arrabito with Jesuit Alberto Rivera. You will notice the elderly man (I cannot remember his name) explaining this. Also note how the Queen needs permission to enter the Sovereign 'City of London' controlled by the SMOM. Notice how she has to wear normal clothing and walk behind its Mayor when entering. The current Mayor by the way is John Stuttard, study his links to the SMOM. The power behind 'The City' is its Mayor, Rothschild etc as the front whilst the Superior General of the Jesuits and his military along with its military Order of Malta who command this powerful mission control. But alas we're not supposed to speak like we do here and you're only to be aware of Round Tables and Rothschilds [JEW JEW JEW]. Talk of the Garter, Pilgrims, SMOM, JESUITS is forbidden haha. Rothschilds "Keepers of the Vatican Treasury," Court Masonic Labor Sabbatian Apostate Jews Loyal to the Pope! Honestly I cannot see why people cannot get this through their heads. The programming of the agents on this internet seems to be working well for them.

__________

Daniel:
Craig,

Andrew Bertie, who controls Queen Elizabeth II: What is his relationship of control to someone such as Cardinal Egan? Being the Head of the SMOM inner core, is he also given control over the Cardinals or vice-versa?

Dear Craig,

Both Egan and Bertie hold the same status of Cardinal or "Prince of the
Church." Both are equally answerable to the Pope. So Bertie works with
Egan as an equal. And both are overseen by the Jesuit Assistants of their
countries.

Brother Eric

Therefore Egan is controlled by the United States Jesuit Assistancy and Bertie being in Rome, the South Europe Assistancy.

Craig Oxley

_____________