Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Communication is Fine, but not Compromise








Big Brother is not a myth now. Local 6 Orlando from June 24, 2008 reported about such a Big Brother story. Orlando, Florida will have more surveillance cameras that can detect motion and alert in real time. They Orlando authorities want to soon install 18 of the 60 motion detecting cameras. It will cost more than $1.3 million. It's part of a whole surveillance video program called IRIS or the Innovative Response to Improve Safety. Of course, these urban officials in support of this idea believe it will detect crime and other incidents in order to report alerts toward law enforcement. The Orlando police Captain Jeff Goltz said that this is an instant system. In this new camera syste, they are recording instant images while older cameras before took some time to develop their recordings. It's been funded by the Federal Homeland Security Department. Homeland Security is the home of a big government appartus controlling much of our society and infringing on our cherished rights (on numerous occasions. The pro-Jesuit John Gannon had a crucial role in Homeland Security's invention). Also, Donations by private companies like Target and Darden have contributed to the creation of the camera program. Officials say that these cameras could be set up in the Kirkman Road area and International Drive in addition to the Parramore area. Orlando is one of the first cities to get high-tech cameras. The violation of our privacy is even beyond cameras. The Real ID Act is another violation of our rights. One vital reason is that the Real ID Act allows the federal government to centralize its control over our entire license system (it tracks our private information even more). It's a national ID system since it forces all Americans to have it in the future to just get a bank account or enter into certain buidings. Michael Hampton from Homeland Stupidity onJune 24, 2008 described on how The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators received a no-bid contract worth millions of dollars to merge state and federal databases under the Real ID program. The government granted nearly $80 million in grants awarded to 48 states and territories to implement various parts of REAL ID in those states. The Real ID Act is worth $11 billion in total according to Michael Hampton. The Real ID Act was passed using many secretive tactics in Congress. It must be opposed That's why states are fighting back in their legitimate opposition to the Real ID Act. Even the Arizona Governor is expected to veto the Real ID Act in her state.

Oil drilling is a hot topic on the political scene. McCain wants offshore drilling and Obama opposes offshore drilling. Some want drilling now. The best solution to deal with the oil crisis is to have a multifaceted approach. That approach can enable solutions to be more viable. You can drill here in America and have alternative energies developed. There has been news about Building Number Seven. NIST reported that before WTC 7's collapse, there was unexplained jet of flames shot out of the windows of floors 7-13. This was when the majority of the floors in the building had no visual evidence of fires. Also, around this time, the majority of fires were going out. There is no information on why these jet of flames occured, but an explosive device is a legitimate possibility in causing such an act. This along with witnesses and other evidence refutes the official story's account of 9/11. The systematic detruction of the Towers (especially Building Number Seven) can't be just a product of fire alone. There also American troops in Tajikistan being ready to invade Afghanistan, Operation Northwoods, NORAD standing down, warnings from over a dozen nations of terror-like attacks using planes, and other evidence of government foreknowledge and involvement in the attacks of 9/11.




Iraq is a brutal war. Some in the mainstream media claim that improvements exist there, but it will be a long time if there is hope for Iraq to be a much more tranquil location. The Iraq was a contrived war by the neo-cons and military industrial complex in order further Western control of the Middle Eastern region. It's the continuation of the ancients' goal of a new world order (or the new order of ages via forced democracies as President George W. Bush blatantly admitted on many occasions). Farah Stockman from the Boston Globe on June 23, 2008 made known abot chemicals and US soldiers. The story goes that U.S. soldiers have been made ill when they were assigned to guard a crucial part of Iraq's oil infrastructure. They were exposed to a highly toxic chemical at the plant. Witnesses testified about this to a Democratic Policy Committee hearing yesterday on Capitol Hill. Danny Langfod was an equipment technician from Texas brought to work at the Qarmat Ali Water treatment plant in 2003. Langford said that soldiers were sick and bleeding from their nose. Some soldiers were spitting blood. Additionally, Langford proclaimed that hundreds of American soldiers at this site were contaminated while guarding the plant. He is one of 9 Americans who are accusing KBR of knowingly exposing the to sodium dichromate, an orange, sandlike chemical that is a potentially lethal carcinogen. KBR is the lead contractor on the Qarmat Ali project and one of the largest defense contractors in Iraq. Experts said that even short term exposure to sodium dichromate can damage the immune system, the liver, it can cause cancer, and make other ailments. A hearing which was held by chaired by Senator Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat, wanted to hold contractors held accountable for alleged malfeasance in Iraq. Defense Department documents outline about 250 Americans being exposed to the chemical. KBR denied any wrongdoing, but Halliburton and Blackwater have been documented as being involved in corruption. If KBR was involved in making the soldiers ill in any way, they ought to recieve the maximum punishment for their crime. Important Supreme Court rulings have come out lately in 2008. AFP Yahoo News described on how the Supreme Court ruling supporting habaes corpus is being ignored by the Bush administration. In essence, the Supreme Court said in a 5-4 decision that detainees who are held by the government have the right to challenge his confinement before a judge in a civilian court. In other words, the detainees held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba have the right to due process. This means that they can't be jailed indefinitely without habaes corpus. Justice Department chief Michael Mukasey said he still wants to continue the military tribunals. Trials are existing. Today, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the Second Amendment soon. This deal with the DC gun ban. This gun ban prevents all citizens from owning a gun in the privacy of their own home. That's wild and illegal because the Second Amendment outline that the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. D.C. is part of American soil with U.S. citizens. The crime rate in Washington, D.C. was exceptionally high immediately after the gun ban was implemented. It's very clear that the Founding Fathers in their Federalist Papers oultine the Second Amendment as an individual right. Also, even the Founding Fathers describe the militia as a group of individual citizens. That's reasonable, because the National Guard wasn't even invented until the early 20th century. No one knows the Supreme Court's decision. It's expected that the Court will induce a half hearted ruling of saying that the Second Amendment promotes individual rights, but restricting those rights are still necessary. The Court today ruled that you can't have the death penalty involving rape, because murder is the only crime to acquire the death penalty.


Planned Parenthood is at it again. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on June 23, 2008 exposed this group some more. PP are trying to change their public perception. Planned Parenthood are consciously shifting their image, but this doesn't escape the fact that Planned Parenthood is the number abortion provider in the United States. They revel in my opinion in innocent babies' innocent blood being shed. That is why they are building their locations in the suburbs of Chicago, Denver, Houston, and Portland. Many Planned Parenthood centers are closing down their businesses downtown centers where aborton is on high levels. In the other words, Planned Parenthood seek to murder unborn babies in suburban areas. With over $1 billion in revenue last fiscal year -- the first time it hit that benchmark -- and hundreds of millions in state and federal funding to go along with it Planned Parenthood has the wealth to expand and build bigger and more professional abortion centers. It's a total disgrace of what their doing since they're killing people under the excuse of health care services. Abortion has nothing to do with authentic health services at all. Some are classifying Planned Parenthood as the Walmart of the abortion industry. The purpose of tat title is that independent abortion centers are finding it tough to compete. What's more sick, is that they are trying to build abortion killing factories at shopping centers and malls where women eat groceries. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on June 24, 2008 discuss extra facts about Planned Parenthood. A coalition of black pro life pastors and advocate plan to march at the headquarters of the Democratic and Republican parites on Thursday. These protests say that Planned Parenthood target black women and historically black communities with their abortion centers. That's true. Margaret Sanger advanced population control efforts against the black community when the black population in that time wasn't rising in high rates. Sanger in her Plan for Peace desired forced segregration, sterilzation, etc. This comes after it's been exposed that some PP operators supported the calls of folks pretending to be racists. Day Gardner, Rev. Clenard Childess, Alveda King, and others want Congrss to defund Planned Parenthood. That should happen since taxpayers ought not to be forced to pay for abortion if they in their conscience disagree with abortion.



John McCain is having more controversy just like Barack Obama. Charlie Black days ago said sick and inapropriate comments days ago. Charlie Black said that another terrorist attack would be a big advantage to John McCain's Presidential campaign. The media has criticized Black's comments. Charlie has apologized for it as being wrong. The comments were and he should be strongly criticized. John McCain has disavowed Black's words as well. The truth is that many other Neo Cons not just Black have similar sick comments. On some cases, the neo-conservatives (who said no apologies) have said words worst than Charlie Black have made manifest publicly. For example, the former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld saying that more terrorism is necessary to get his agenda going. Excerpts of these confidential recordings that Rumsfeld made were released under the Freedom of Information Act .The PNAC Document said that a Pearl Harbor like event is one way in order for preemptive wars in the Middle East can be achieved (including how genotype bioweapons for political reasons is a possibility). In August last year Philadelphia Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky openly called for "another 9/11" that "would help America" restore a "community of outrage and national resolve". Newt Gingrich said words of abhoring the First Amendment, so all of these comments should be exposed. The truth is that governments have exploited terror attacks for political gains for thousands of years. You can look at the Nazis' Operation Gleiwitz (The Nazis was influenced by the occult and Secret Societies from the Theosophical Society to the Thule Society. The Nazis were influenced by the Jesuits and funded by the Vatican via the Knights of Malta like SMOM Franz von Papen), the Lavon Affair, Operation Cyclone, and others for evidence of government inside jobs (or other scandals). Barack Obama has its own controversies. Obama shunned Muslim audience members before apologizing for it. Also, Obama said that the leadership of the "Christian Right" hijacked religion. The term "Christian Right" is a term utilize by some to unfairly demonize people of faith. Even Merrill A. McPeak, Obama's military adviser and national campaign co-chairman compared conservative Christians to terror groups Hamas and Hezbollah. Obama to this credit doesn't lump all conservative Christians as extremists or equivalent to violent terrorists globally. Obama has said that secularists are wrong to assume that no religious expression is to be expressed in the public square, which is true. Obama was wrong to assume that pro-life people don't outline logical and scientific reasons in opposing abortion. We do all of the time like the genetic nature of unborn life being human, the scientific risk factors of abortion, etc. That's why James Dobson criticized him, though Dobson is connected with the Elite. This is proof that the Ecumencial Movement is strong and conservative Christians are being stereotyped all of the time. Ralph Nader calling Obama trying to act "white" is disrespectful and outline desperation. Nader is right to expose evil oligarchies, but a man's race shouldn't be a factor in voting for or against a candidate. I judge a man by their views and agenda not by the color of a man's skin. Some Christians are being unfairly arrested in the UK, Canada, and even in America. McCain and Barack Obama are a lot alike in their views. Both of them agree with gun control, each agree with global warming hysteria, agree with the pro-Bush FISA bill, both agree with the Patriot Act, each agree with some troops staying in Iraq, are both of them pro-abortion on rape plus incest, and each agree with the war on terror. People have a right to criticize John McCain and Barack Obama. They would rarely if ever talk about the Federal Reserve, tackling against corporate corruption (not every company, but evil ones), the North American Union, the poisons of lead, flouride, aspartame, etc.







There are still some lusting after a war inside of Iran. John Bolton is a former United Nations ambassador, who was appointd by President George W. Bush. He predicts that Israel will attack Iran's nuclear sites before the next U.S. President is sworn as President in January. Bolton said this to an interview wth the UK's The Telegraph. Bolton even went as saying that the Arabic world would be pleased with such an invasion even though public denunciations would exist. The truth is that if such an attack occur preemptive Israel would be hated even more in the region. Hezbollah and other groups could retiliate even harsher in Isreal via violence. Bolton believes that the Bush administration has all but given up on the idea of invading Iran. Bolton said that Israel doesn't want to attack before the election, because they fear that the consequences are unknown toward the election. The truth is that Iran remains no direct threat to America or Israel. Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons. Israel is fully capable of defending themselves against an attack from countries in Middle East. John Bolton of course aligns with John McCain's foreign policy approach toward Iran. American and Isreali forces conducted long range exercise over the Meditterean Sea and the Persian Gulf. It's ironic that Iran has attack al-Qaeda forces in Iran, but some neo-cons falsely accuse Iran as being pro-al-Qaeda when Iran is a mostly Shia nation. Al-Qaeda is mostly Sunni and Wahhabi. Mohamed ElBaradei, who is the head of the UN International Atomic Energy Agency, said military action against Iran would turn the Middle East into a "fireball" and accelerate Iran's nuclear program. Iran isn't perfect with their political, religious, and gender repression (including oppression), but Iran doesn't deserve being blown away via military means. Paramilitary groups consume fascist or dictatorial governments. JULIAN ASSANGE from Wikileaks.org on June 23, 2008 made known about a sensitive 219 page U.S. military counterinsurgency manual. The manual is entitled "Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces " from 1994 and the year 2004. These FID manuals and operations were instrumental in proping up "friendly" (sometimes even fascist) goernment against revolutionaries. These interventions are sometimes covert or quasi covet because of the unpopular nature of the governmes beig supported. The training supports training paramilitaries, have hardcore surveillance, censorship, press control, warrantlesss searchers, detainment without charges, and other anti-freedom initiatives. It also makes apparently clear of utilizing "pyschological operations" to propaganda to get their agenda accomphlished. This plans are similar to the United States involvemet in El Salvador to get rid of leftists during the 1980's. Frankily, both the fascists and the leftists were corrupt. Although, Reagan's administation backed the fascists who were involved in torturing people and other nefarious deeds. The manual has 219 pages.



Zimbabwe is a nation in crisis. For a number of years, Zimbabwe has been a country experiencing food crisis, the HIV/AIDS epidemic, a high infant mortality rate, etc. That is why many citizens wanted a serious political change there. In March 29, 2008, Zimbabwe held a presidential election along with a parliamentary election. The three major candidates were Robert Mugabe of the Zimbabwe African National Union - Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF), Morgan Tsvangirai of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), and Simba Makoni, an independent. The nation didn't present the results of the election in weeks. The Election has caused violence. It's been so much violence that MDC's candidate Morgan Tsvangirai decieded to pull of the 2008 presidential election. Robert Mugabe said that he will not allow the MDC to rule Zimbabwe. He accused Morgan of being a puppet of Britian, but Mugabe is a known dictator. Robert is notoriously Jesuit trained. Runoff elections existed. Some international attention is given unto Zimbabwe because of election and civil rights concerns there. Madeline Albright wants the African Union to be involved in order to solve the election complications over in Zimbabwe. The UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said that the elections should be postponed. If fair and free elections don't exist in Zimbabwe, it isn't the only nation with election issues. The U.S. has the election debacle of the year 2000. Greg Palast wrote a book exposing the shady actions in the 2000 Election fiasco. There are issues with the new Housing Bill. This bill is calld HR 3221. It has a provision that requires almost all credit card transacton to be report to the government (in the IRS). Now, (HR 3221) is nothing more than a slick bill in order to allow the government to track and trace as many transactions as possible. Of course, with the dollar devalued, certain people want a cashless society. Previously, Visa's CEO has stated that it is their goal to establish a cashless society by the year 2012. If too much reliance on credit continues, biometrics can increase and this may unfortunately increase the risk for a cashless society. If a cashless society exists, the elie in the government will control our capital. It's not us controlling our capital. Our money is being loaned and thrown away into the hands of the government and the elite. Groups like Freedomworks and companies like EBay have legitimate condemns this bill. It's an invasion of privacy and the government has no right to find out about innocent transactions at all. It's a disgrace and the essence of a Big Brother plot.


Homeschoolers are continued to be threatened in the state of California. Ironically, this is the 160th anniversay of public education in California. Things change. Once, America had some of the best educated students in the world. Things changed with less discipline, large class sizes, a failure to put more emphasis on math plus science, etc. making many schools under perform. Some cities have high rates of folks not graduating from high school. There are some good news. Some schools are performing magnificently in their graduation rates and other aspects of the function of their education. One huge problem in education is forcing all students to go to a specific school, while restricting real school choice. This doesn't mean people shouldn't go into public school if they want to. It does mean that private and homeschooling ought to be avaliable for any child and parent who desire it. That's one essence of America. True American values always include self reliance and the liberty to decide for our own education. Now, some California court want to ban all homeschooling, except if it's regulated plus approved of by the government. Arnold Schwarznegger (whose father was a Nazi and Bohemian Grove members assisted his campaign into being Governor) promises to resist the court's action against homeschooling. We shall see if he fulfills his promise. Studies show consistently that homeschooling works. It makes literate students and propel them to score high on standarlized tests. That's ironic since Hitler's Nazis banned homeschooling in their degenerate rise to power. To this day, Germany bans all homeschooling. Some like Freemason Al Sharpton and others say let's have dialogue. Well, where does that leave? I believe in communication, but I will never forsake my values for the sake of sucking up to the majority. That's why I'm against martial law, terror attacks, abortion, putting non-violent drug offenders in prison, I'm against the war on Drugs period (it's a war on civil liberties). It contributes to the high prison rate in the USA. The USA imprisons more citizens than any nation in the world. The Drug War has no constitutional basis at all. It's a federal government infringement of people's individual rights. Kevin Booth's "The American Drug War" is a film exposing the Drug War. I reject mandatory minimum sentences. Charity, treatment, and other assistance are need to help non-violent drug addicts not jail. I believe in using hemp for industrial purposes, I abhor forced vaccination and forcing people to take pharmaceutical drugs (some of which are extremely dangerous), torture, and other evils. I respect the good in life like the perservation of life, I believe in perserving our national sovereignity, building up our communities, our individual liberty, and showing the truth to people.

By Timothy

No comments: